Next Article in Journal
Effect of Drought on Herbivore-Induced Plant Gene Expression: Population Comparison for Range Limit Inferences
Next Article in Special Issue
Canola/Rapeseed Protein: Future Opportunities and Directions—Workshop Proceedings of IRC 2015
Previous Article in Journal
Jasmonate Signalling and Defence Responses in the Model Legume Medicago truncatula—A Focus on Responses to Fusarium Wilt Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Leptosphaeria maculans and Leptosphaeria biglobosa Causing Blackleg Disease in Canola from Canadian Canola Seed Lots and Dockage

Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2016, 5(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants5010012
Submission received: 14 January 2016 / Revised: 11 February 2016 / Accepted: 22 February 2016 / Published: 1 March 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected/Extended Full Papers of 14th International Rapeseed Congress)

Abstract

:
Blackleg, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans, is a major threat to canola production in Canada. With the exception of China, L. maculans is present in areas around the world where cruciferous crops are grown. The pathogen can cause trade barriers in international canola seed export due to its potential risk as a seed contaminant. The most recent example is China restricting canola seeds imported from Canada and Australia in 2009. Therefore, it is important to assess the level of Blackleg infection in Canadian canola seed lots and dockage (seeds and admixture). In this study, canola seed lots and dockage samples collected from Western Canada were tested for the presence of the aggressive L. maculans and the less aggressive L. biglobosa. Results showed that both L. maculans and L. biglobosa were present in seed lots and dockage samples, with L. biglobosa being predominant in infected seeds. Admixture separated from dockage had higher levels of L. maculans and L. biglobosa infection than samples from seed lots. Admixture appears to harbour higher levels of L. maculans infection compared to seeds and is more likely to be a major source of inoculum for the spread of the disease than infected seeds.

1. Introduction

Blackleg, also known as phoma stem canker, is an economically important disease of Brassica napus (canola, oilseed rape) and many other cruciferous species worldwide. Blackleg epidemics occur regularly in oilseed rape crops and have been observed in Europe, Canada, and Australia [1]. On oilseed rape, it causes serious losses in Europe, Australia, and North America; worldwide losses are estimated at >$900 million per growing season [1,2]. Two species, aggressive Leptosphaeria maculans and non-aggressive (less aggressive) L. biglobosa can cause Blackleg disease on canola [3,4,5]. These species co-exist in most B. napus growing areas of the world [3,4,5] except in China where only L. biglobosa has been reported [1,6,7,8,9,10]. The taxonomic history of L. maculans has been relatively unclear until recently. The first common distinction was made between highly-virulent or aggressive “A” group strains (currently referred to as L. maculans) that produced the phytotoxin sirodesmin PL and were also able to infect canola, and the weakly-virulent or non-aggressive, “B” group strains (currently referred to as L. biglobosa) that did not produce sirodesmin PL nor could infect canola [11]. Leptosphaeria maculans survives from season to season in residues after harvest and ambient weather provides conditions favorable for the initiation, development, and maturation of pycnidia and pseudothecia. Ascospores and pycnidiospores released from infected residues serve as a source of primary inoculum for infection of canola seedlings [4,12]. Although L. maculans is more aggressive than L. biglobosa, their life cycles are similar. All parts of the susceptible canola/oilseed rape host can be colonized by these pathogens, including the root, stem (mainly the base), upper stem parts, leaves, cotyledons, and seeds [13]. It has been reported that the pathogens causing Blackleg are adaptable, since the disease is very damaging on both spring and winter (autumn-sown) types of oilseed rape in a wide range of climates [4]. Therefore, it is possible that L. maculans “brassicae” has successfully spread into new areas by global trade and/or natural dispersal [4].
To date, Blackleg has not been a serious problem in China and only the less aggressive L. biglobosa has been found there [1,6,7,8,9,10]. In China winter oilseed rape is often followed by several weeks of flooding with a paddy rice crop [14]. It has been reported that flooding can rapidly reduce the survival of the Blackleg pathogen in canola stubble [15]. L. maculans is considered a global invasive species, it has recently spread across Canada (1975–1998), from the USA into Mexico (2001) and eastwards across Europe into Poland (1994–2007), where only the less damaging L. biglobosa was previously present [1]. Therefore, there may be a potential risk of spreading this pathogen into China via global canola seed trade.
Blackleg is the most important fungal disease of canola in Western Canada. In the last two decades, the disease has been managed mainly using resistant cultivars and longer crop rotations. However, in the recent past, tighter rotations driven by market demand have created situations favorable for increased risk of disease outbreaks and resistance breakdown [16,17]. Currently L. maculans is listed as a quarantine disease in China. Since 1994, China imports several million tons of canola from Canada, where L. maculans is a prevalent pathogen on canola [4]. In 2009, the Chinese government restricted the importation of oilseed rape seeds from Canada [10]. The potential risk was considered to be the import of L. maculans-infected canola seed lots, dockage, and the associated admixture to L. maculans free canola regions/fields. The associated admixture includes small pieces of crop debris and parts from pod sheath and branches, etc. This resulted in a decrease in exports of oilseed rape seeds from Canada in 2010 and 2011. However, by 2011, China eventually agreed to allow access to several canola oil crushing-plants at or near ports and not in canola growing regions. Therefore, the potential risk of introducing the pathogen through infected seeds and dockage needs to be determined in order to maintain continuous access to the Chinese canola market.
Due to the importance of this disease in global trade, this research investigated canola seed lots and dockage infection by the two Leptosphaeria species in Canada. The objective of the study was to determine the relative risk that canola seed and dockage play in introducing L. maculans to areas devoid of this pathogen. To understand this better, the following areas were investigated, (1) the frequency and viability of blackleg infection on seed lots and dockage, and (2) the ability of infected seed lots and dockage to produce L. maculans primary inoculum.

2. Results

2.1. Frequency and Viability of Leptosphaeria Species in Seed Lots Samples

Twenty-five seed lot samples collected from co-op sites were incubated in moisture chambers (1000 seeds per sample, 25,000 individual seeds) to detect Blackleg infection in canola seeds. All seeds that showed formation of pycnidia or hyphae were considered infected (Figure 1). Out of 25 samples, five samples did not show any seed infection. A total of 1072 blackleg isolates were isolated from infected seeds, and cultured on V8® agar plates to obtain pycnidiospores for DNA extraction. To identify L. maculans “brassicae” and L. biglobosa “brassicae”, species-specific primers described by Liu et al. [18] was adopted in this study. These primers are developed based on the sequence differences of the ribosomal RNA region between these two species. In the PCR assay, L. maculans “brassicae” gave an amplified product of 331 bp while L. biglobosa “brassicae” gave 444 bp of amplified product (Figure 2). Ten of each amplified products were sequenced to confirm the accuracy of the PCR amplified products. Out of all 1072 isolates, only 61 (5.7%) isolates were identified as L. maculans “brassicae” and 1011 (94.3%) were L. biglobosa “brassicae” (Table 1). Therefore, when considering a single seed, the possibility of having the L. maculans infection was 0.24% and L. biglobosa was 4.04%. The data showed that canola varieties rated as susceptible to Blackleg, such as Westar, had higher levels of L. maculans seed infection (1.07%, i.e., 43 L. maculans infected seeds among 4000 tested Westar seeds from four different sites) compared to varieties rated as resistant, such as Q2 (0.35%), 72-65RR (0.2%), and Invigor 5440 (0%) (Figure 3). The highest number of L. mauclans infected seeds (30) was identified in Westar samples collected from Plum Coulee, MB, while the highest number of L. biglobosa-infected seeds (300) was found in seed samples collected from Canora, SK, Canada. All infected seeds produced pycnidia. Some of the infected seeds could germinate and develop into infected cotyledons; however, all of these cotyledons died without any further growth. In summary, L. biglobosa is the predominant species present in infected canola seeds.

2.2. Identification of Leptosphaeria Species in Dockage

A total of 38 canola dockage samples (composed of seeds, chaff and straw) were collected from commercial fields or elevators to further identify Blackleg infection in seeds and the associated admixture. Seeds were first separated from dockage and seed infection analysis was performed as mentioned above (Section 2.1). The remaining chaff and straw were considered as admixture. DNA was extracted from admixture (a total of 100 individual DNA samples per admixture sample) to dectect Blackleg infection in admixture using species-specific PCR assay [18]. Comparison of Blackleg infection in seed and admixture samples is shown in Table 2. Of the 38 samples tested, L. maculans seed infection was observed in 9 and L. biglobosa in 14 samples. The level of seed infection of the above samples ranged 0%–0.4% for L. maculans and 0%–0.2% for L. biglobosa. Higher levels of Blackleg infection in admixture was observed in 14 samples for L. maculans and nine samples for L. biglobosa, ranging 0%–31% and 0%–10%, respectively. Seed infection with both species was observed in seven samples, and admixture infection with both species was observed only in two samples. Among 38 samples, 22 samples did not show any seed infection and 18 samples did not show any admixture infection either by L. maculans or L. biglobosa. Taken together, these data indicated that admixture carried higher level of blackleg infection, mainly L. maculans than seeds.

2.3. Ability of Admixture to Produce Blackleg Inoculum

To understand the ability of admixture to produce Blackleg inoculum, admixture samples were incubated in moisture chambers at different temperatures. No pycnidia was observed on admixture kept at 5 °C and 15 °C. Admixture samples at room temperature (25 °C) showed some pycnidia growth, although the typical amethyst ooze was not visible. Sexual fruiting bodies (pseudothecia) were not observed on infected seeds as environmental conditions within the moisture chamber may not be favourable for sexual reproduction. Some of those pycnidia were excised and viewed under the microscope to confirm the presence of spores. Pycnidiospores were abundantly present in all of the samples examined. Out of 15 pieces tested individually, nine had L. maculans; but L. biglobosa was not detected in any of the samples. The above results suggested that admixture can produce Blackleg inoculum under favourable conditions, and environmental factors, such as temperature and relative humidity, may affect the ability of admixture to produce Blackleg inoculum.

2.4. The Ability of Admixture to Cause Infection

Greenhouse assays were performed to detect the ability of admixture to cause infection on canola seedlings. Seven days after wounding, infections were visible on some Westar cotyledons from trays with admixture (Figure 4a). No cotyledon infection was observed in control plants. After two weeks, infections had progressed in more than 50% of plants and they exhibited different levels of infection (Figure 4b). Pycnidia were visible on many infected canola cotyledons. An average of 37% of the infection sites was considered susceptible (rating scale of 0–9, rating ≥5.0). These results indicated that admixture with blackleg infection can cause seedling infection.

3. Discussion

Canola is one of the major cash crops in Canada generating a substantial annual turnover. Diseases such as Blackleg, can cause significant losses unless managed properly. Blackleg of canola is mainly managed in Canada through the use of resistant varieties, fungicides, and cultural practices [16,19]. In addition to crop losses, Blackleg can have an impact on accessing foreign markets, especially in areas where the pathogen has not been reported before. A bulk of Canadian canola seeds are exported to China for extraction of oil. Chen et al. [20] identified L. maculans from imported canola seeds in China. Due to the possible risk of introduction of this pathogen through imported seeds, there is a restricted market access for Canadian canola in China. In view of this, research was mandated to assess the level of Blackleg infection in Canadian seed lots and dockage samples.
The results from this study showed that although both species of the pathogen could be found in canola seeds, the most frequent one was the less aggressive L. biglobosa (0%–0.4%). The L. maculans levels were very low, ranging 0%–0.2%. Chigogora and Hall [21] had reported seed infection levels up to 5.1% in Canadian canola, which were much higher than levels reported in previous studies [22,23]. These elevated seed infection levels were attributed to weather conditions, availability of inoculum in the season and increase of Blackleg severity and incidence [16,21]. It is worth noting that higher frequencies of L. maculans were observed in samples collected from Plum Coulee (30 isolates) and Vegreville (23 isolates). These are the areas where more virulent L. maculans isolates were identified and reported [24].
Differences between varieties were observed in this study. For example, in Plum Coulee, Westar, a susceptible variety that is no longer grown commercially had a higher percentage of L. maculans seed infection (3%) compared to the moderately resistant variety Defender which had no L. maculans seed infection. In addition, other commercial varieties showed low levels of L. maculans seed infection. This could indicate that inherent Blackleg resistance in canola varieties plays a major role in lowering the risk of seed infection levels, even in areas where pathogen population is relatively high.
Infected seeds mostly rotted before they could germinate. The few seeds that germinated did not grow into seedlings, indicating that infected seeds may not grow into infected plants and produce additional inoculum. McGee [22] reported that inoculum from plant residue was contributing more to seedling and adult plant infections than seed infection. Barbetti and Khangura [25] also reported that infected seeds are often shrivelled and might not germinate. Seed lots with low percentages of infected seeds were observed to produce cotyledons with low infection rate [26]. Moreover, Van de Wouw et al. [27] reported that viability of L. maculans in infected seeds reduced over time. Although the potential risk of introducing the pathogen in to previously non-infested areas via infected seeds cannot be ignored, the risk it poses is minimal [21]. In China, imported canola seeds are solely used for crushing, the risk of spreading blackleg disease via imported seeds is presumably low. In addition, L. biglobosa, the less aggressive species which already has been found in China was more prevalent in infected seeds. Although in some studies conducted in Europe indicated that Chinese B. napus cultivars were susceptible to L. maculans, recent studies have shown that high percentage of B. napus cultivars/lines from China showed both major gene resistance and adult plant resistance [1,16,28]. This shows that Chinese B. napus cultivars have the necessary resistance mechanism to withstand the potential risk of L. maculans if it is introduced via infected seeds. However, we still cannot fully ignore the potential threat that it may pose by introduction of L. maculans into areas where it has not been previously reported.
According to this study, all infected seeds and admixture produced pycnidiospores. Pycnidiospores have been reported to be the primary sources of inoculum in Western Canada rather than ascospores [12,29]. L. maculans was present in admixture in higher percentages compared to seed infection. Our data support the assumption by Zhang et al. [11] that admixture was likely to be more important than infected seeds in transmitting L. maculans. It was also evident that the pathogen was viable on admixture and could infect cotyledons. Hence, admixture appears to be a more important component in terms of carrying significant levels of inoculum to introduce the disease into new areas than infected seeds. Therefore, this study recommends the efficient removal and management of admixture, especially at crushing sites, to significantly minimize the risk of introduction of Blackleg pathogens to new areas either via dockage or seed lots.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection

Seed lots samples were collected from co-op sites in 2011, while dockage samples were collected from commercially-grown canola fields and/or from elevators in 2012. Samples were transported to the laboratory in paper or plastic bags and stored at room temperature (25 °C) until processing (all samples were processed within three months after collection). Blackleg resistance of canola varieties from fields was evaluated using a rating scale of 0–5 based on internal infection of the stem base (Western Canada Canola/Rapeseed Recommending Committee). At least 100 stubbles per field were evaluated for Blackleg resistance. The average rating score (ARS) was transformed into level of resistance. Level of resistance: S––susceptible; MS––moderately susceptible; R––resistant; MR––moderately resistant.

4.2. Identification of Leptosphaeria Species from Seed Samples

A total of 25 seed samples were used for seed infection analysis. The approach traditionally used to determine the severity of seed contamination is to plate surface sterilized seed on agar and record the number of seeds that produce colonies of the pathogen(s). This method is accepted by the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) as a means of determining the incidence of pathogen infection in seed [30]. Since we were more interested in examining the internal fungal infection of canola seeds, a similar approach was used as described by Kharbanda and Stevens [31]. At first, 1000 seeds per sample were surface disinfected in 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 1 min, followed by rinsing with sterile distilled water three times. Seeds were air dried and transferred onto several layers of moistened sterile paper towels in a sterile moist chamber to absorb moisture for 24 h, followed by 24 h at 4 °C to slow down germination. Seeds were then kept in the moist chamber at room temperature for five days while monitoring fungal growth. Seeds showing fungal growth were placed on V8® juice agar (200 mL of V8® juice, 0.75 g of CaCO3, 15 g of agar, 800 mL of distilled H2O) plates amended with streptomycin sulphate (0.35% (w/v)). All seeds that showed formation of pycnidia or hyphae on or around them were considered infected. Seeds that did not exhibit pycnidia or hyphae were considered non-infected. Pure cultures of Blackleg isolates were made by single pycnidiospore isolation and all isolates were preserved until further use.
Isolates were then identified as L. maculans or L. biglobosa by species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. DNA was extracted from pycnidiospores according to the method described by Lee and Taylor [32] with the following modification. Spores were initially homogenised using 0.2 mm ceramic beads for 45 sec at 6500 rpm in a Precellys® 24 homogeniser (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). PCR assay using species-specific primers described by Liu et al. [18] was adopted in this study to determine the identity of each isolate as either L. maculans “brassicae” or L. biglobosa “brassicae”. Following primers were used in the PCR assays; LbigF 5ʹ-ATCAGGGGATTGGTGTCAGCAGTTGA-3ʹ, LmacF 5ʹ-CTTGCCCACCAATTGG-ATCCCCTA-3ʹ, and a common reverse primer LmacR 5ʹ-GCAAAATGTGCTGCGCTCCAGG-3ʹ [18]. The PCR amplified product from L. maculans “brassicae” gave a 331 bp amplified product while L. biglobosa “brassicae” gave a 444 bp of amplified product.
To determine whether Blackleg-infected seeds can develop disease in canola cotyledons, infected seeds that were able to germinate were transplanted into soilless potting mix. These pots were placed in a controlled growth chamber at 16 °C (night) and 21 °C (day), with a 16 h photoperiod.

4.3. Determination of Leptosphaeria Species in Dockage Samples Collected from Commercial Fields

Canola dockage samples collected were composed of seeds, chaff, and straw. A total of 38 dockage samples were collected for the analysis. At first, seeds were separated from dockage. The remaining chaff and straw from dockage samples were considered as admixture, theses include small pieces of crop debris such as sections of the pod sheath and branches. To determine the level of Blackleg infection in admixture, DNA was extracted from 100 randomly selected single chaff/straw pieces (one DNA sample per single chaff/straw piece) from each of the commercial samples separately as described by Demeke et al. [33]. Identification of Leptosphaeria species as L. maculans or L. biglobosa was done using species-specific primers described by Liu et al. [18]. In order to compare the levels of infection between seeds and admixture from the same samples, seeds separated from dockage were tested for Blackleg infection as described above.

4.4. The Ability of Admixture to Produce Primary Inoculum

An experiment was carried out to investigate the ability of admixture to produce primary inoculum such as pycnidiospores or ascospores. Admixture samples were kept in a moist chamber (plastic box lined with fine sand and paper towel) at 5 °C, 15 °C, and ambient temperature (25 °C). Samples were monitored every day for three weeks for the appearance of pycnidia. The identity of those pycnidia as L. maculans or L. biglobosa was determined by PCR assay [18].

4.5. The Ability of Admixture to Cause Infection

A universal blackleg susceptible canola variety, Westar was used to test the ability of admixture to cause plant infection. The seedlings (covered with admixture from Westar dockage samples) were grown in trays filled with Sunshine mix #4 (SunGro Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA) in a controlled growth chamber (same growth condition as described in Section 4.2). Westar plants were grown in three replicates, each replicate having 32 plants. A control was performed without adding admixture. To create route of infection, cotyledons were wounded at multiple sites (ten wounds per plant) seven days after seeding. A transparent plastic cover was placed over tray to increase humidity. The appearance and progression of blackleg infection was monitored for 14 days after wounding. Infected cotyledons were rated based on a 0 to 9 scale where 0 = no infection and 9 = tissue collapse and appearance of sporulation [34]. Ratings ≥5.0 were considered virulent and ≤4.9 were considered avirulent.

5. Conclusions

Both L. maculans and L. biglobosa were present in seed and dockage samples collected from Western Canada, whereas the majority of seed infection was caused by L. biglobosa.Compared with seed lots, admixture separated from dockage appears to harbour higher levels of L. maculans and L. biglobosa infection, with L. maculans infection being predominant. Admixture is able to produce primary inoculum (pycnidiospores) and cause severe seedling infection on Westar. Thus, admixture is more likely to be a major source of inoculum than infected seeds during the spread of the disease. It is therefore essential to efficiently remove admixture, especiallyat crushing sites, to minimize the risk of introducing L. maculans to new areas.

Acknowledgments

Authors gratefully acknowledge the operational funding support for this research provided by Canola Council of Canada. We also appreciate the help from all collaborators and growers who provided us with canola seed and dockage samples. We thank Besrat Demoz and Paula Parks for the excellent technical assistance.

Author Contributions

W. G. Dilantha Fernando designed and supervised the experiment. Xuehua Zhang and Chami C. Amarasinghe performed the experiments with technical assistance and wrote the manuscript. W. G. Dilantha Fernando reviewed and finalized the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fitt, B.D.L.; Brun, H.; Barbetti, M.J.; Rimmer, S.R. World-wide importance of phoma stem canker (Leptosphaeria maculans and L. biglobosa) on oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 114, 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitt, B.D.L.; Hu, B.C.; Li, Z.Q.; Liu, S.Y.; Lange, R.M.; Kharbanda, P.D.; Butterworth, M.H.; White, R.P. Strategies to prevent spread of Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker) onto oilseed rape crops in China; costs and benefits. Plant Pathol. 2008, 57, 652–664. [Google Scholar]
  3. West, J.S.; Biddulph, J.E.; Fitt, B.D.L.; Gladders, P. Epidemiology of Leptosphaeria maculans in relation to forecasting stem canker severity on winter oilseed rape in the UK. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1999, 135, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. West, J.S.; Kharbanda, P.; Barbetti, M.J.; Fitt, B.D.L. Epidemiology and management of Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker) in Australia, Canada and Europe. Plant Pathol. 2001, 50, 10–27. [Google Scholar]
  5. West, J.S.; Balesdent, M.H.; Rouxel, T.; Narcy, J.P.; Huang, Y.J.; Roux, J.; Steed, J.M.; Fitt, B.D.L.; Schmit, J. Colonization of winter oilseed rape tissues by ATox+ and B/Tox0 Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker) in France and England. Plant Pathol. 2002, 51, 311–321. [Google Scholar]
  6. West, J.S.; Evans, N.; Liu, S.; Hu, B.; Peng, L. Leptosphaeria maculans causing stem canker of oilseed rape in China. Plant Pathol. 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mendes-Pereira, E.; Balesdent, M.H.; Brun, H.; Rouxel, T. Molecular phylogeny of the Leptosphaeria maculans––L. biglobosa species complex. Mycol. Res. 2003, 107, 1287–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hao, L.F.; Song, P.L.; Li, Z.Q.; Li, Q.S.; Hu, B.C. Studies on the biological characteristics of Leptosphaeria biglobosa on Chinese oilseed rape. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2012, 34, 419–424. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Q.S.; Rong, S.B.; Hu, B.C.; Jiang, Y.F.; Hou, S.M.; Fei, W.X.; Chen, F.X.; Wu, X.J.; Fan, Z.X.; Lei, W.X. Distribution of blackleg disease on oilseed rape in China and its pathogen identification. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2013, 35, 415–423. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, X.; White, R.P.; Demir, E.; Jedryczka, M.; Lamge, R.M.; Islam, M.; Li, Z.Q.; Huang, Y.J.; Hall, A.M.; Zhou, G.; et al. Leptosphaeria spp., phoma stem canker and potential spread of L. maculans on oilseed rape crops in China. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 598–612. [Google Scholar]
  11. Balesdent, M.H.; Jedryczka, M.; Jain, L.; Mendes-Pereira, E.; Bertrandy, J.; Rouxel, T. Conidia as a substrate for internal transcribed spacer-based PCR identification of members of the Leptosphaeria maculans species complex. Phytopathology 1998, 88, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Ghanbarnia, K.; Fernando, W.G.D.; Crow, G. Comparison of disease severity and incidence at different growth stages of naturally infected canola plants under field conditions by pycnidiospores of Phoma lingam as a main source of inoculum. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 33, 355–363. [Google Scholar]
  13. Paul, V.H.; Rawlinson, C.J. Diseases and pests of oilseed rape; Gelsenkirchen-Buer: Verlag Theodore Mann, Germany, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu, J.; Cheng, X.; Xiao, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, L.; Ellis, E.C. Agricultural landscape change in China’s Yangtze Delta, 1942–2002: A case study. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peluola, C.; Fernando, W.G.D.; Huvenaars, C.; Kutcher, H.R.; Lahlali, R.; Peng, G. Effect of flooding on the survival of Leptosphaeria spp. in canola stubble. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62, 1350–1356. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kutcher, H.R.; Balesdent, M.H.; Rimmer, S.R.; Rouxel, T.; Chèvre, A.M.; Delourme, R.; Brun, H. Frequency of avirulence genes in Leptosphaeria maculans in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2010, 32, 77–85. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, X.; Peng, G.; Kutcher, H.R.; Balesdent, M.-H.; Delourme, R.; Fernando, W.G.D. Breakdown of Rlm3 resistance in the Brassica napus–Leptosphaeria maculans pathosystem in western Canada. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.Y.; Liu, Z.; Fitt, B.D.L.; Evans, N.; Forster, S.J.; Huang, Y.J.; Latunde-Dada, A.O.; Lucas, J.A. Resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker) in Brassica napus (oilseed rape) induced by L. biglobosa and chemical defence activators in field and controlled environments. Plant Pathol. 2006, 55, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Fernando, W.G.D. Prevalence of pathogenicity groups of Leptosphaeria maculans in western Canada and North Dakota, USA. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 1, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, J.Y.; Wu, C.P.; Li, B.; Su, H.; Zhen, S.Z.; An, Y.L. Detection of Leptosphaeria maculans from imported Canola seeds. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 2010, 117, 173–176. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chigogora, J.L.; Hall, R. Relationship among measures of blackleg in winter oilseed rape and infection of harvested seed by Leptosphaeria maculans. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1995, 17, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. McGee, D.C. Blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. et de Not.) of rapeseed in Victoria: sources of infection and relationships between inoculum, environmental factors and disease severity. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1977, 28, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hall, R. Epidemiology of blackleg of oilseed rape. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1992, 14, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liban, S.H.; Cross, D.J.; Kutcher, H.R.; Peng, G.; Fernando, W.G.D. Race structure and frequency of avirulence genes in the western Canadian Leptosphaeria maculans pathogen population, the causal agent of blackleg in brassica species. Plant Pathol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barbetti, M.; Khangura, R. Fungal diseases of canola in Western Australia; Bulletin 4406; 2000. Avaliable online: http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/PC_92073.html#flowers (accessed on 12 September 2012).
  26. Wood, P.M.c.R.; Barbetti, M.J. The role of seed infection in the spread of blackleg of rape in Western Australia. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 1977, 17, 1040–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Van de Wouw, A.P.; Elliott, V.L.; Ware, A.; Lindbeck, K.; Howlett, B.J.; Marcroft, S.J. Infection of canola pods by Leptosphaeria maculans and subsequent seed contamination. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.X.; Wratten, N.; Salisbury, P.A.; Burton, W.A.; Potter, T.D.; Walton, G. Response of Brassica napus and B. juncea germplasm from Australia, China and India to Australian populations of Leptosphaeria maculans. Aust. Plant Pathol. 2008, 37, 162–170. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ghanbarnia, K.; Fernando, W.G.D.; Crow, G. Developing rainfall- and temperature-based models to describe infection of canola under field conditions caused by pycnidiospores of Leptosphaeria maculans. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Glynn, N.C.; Edwards, S.G. Evaluation of PCR assays for quantifying seed-borne infection by Fusarium and Microdochium seedling blight pathogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kharbanda, P.D.; Stevens, R.R. Seed Testing for Blackleg of Canola; Alberta Environmental Centre: Vegreville, AB, Canda, 1993; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Isolation of DNA from fungal mycelia and single spores. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 282–287. [Google Scholar]
  33. Demeke, T.; Ratnayaka, I.; Holigroski, M.; Phan, A. Assessment of extraction methods for PCR testing of discontinued or unapproved biotech events in single seeds of canola, flax and soybean. Food Control 2012, 24, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  34. Williams, P.H.; Delwiche, P.A. Screening for Resistance to Blackleg of Crucifers in the Seedling Stage. In 1997 Proceedings of Eucarpia Conference; Breeding of Cruciferous Crops: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1979; pp. 164–170. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Canola seeds infected with Leptosphaeria species. Dark dots on and around seeds represents pycnidia.
Figure 1. Canola seeds infected with Leptosphaeria species. Dark dots on and around seeds represents pycnidia.
Plants 05 00012 g001
Figure 2. Blackleg isolates identified using species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Lanes: M-100bp DNA ladder; 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9––Leptosphaeria biglobosa “brassicae” (444 bp); 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12––Leptosphaeria maculans “brassicae” (331 bp).
Figure 2. Blackleg isolates identified using species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Lanes: M-100bp DNA ladder; 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9––Leptosphaeria biglobosa “brassicae” (444 bp); 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12––Leptosphaeria maculans “brassicae” (331 bp).
Plants 05 00012 g002
Figure 3. Percentage of Leptosphaeria maculans infected seeds in canola samples with different level of Blackleg resistance. Level of resistance: S––susceptible; MS––moderately susceptible; R––resistant; MR––moderately resistant. Westar: S; Q2: MS; 72-65RR: R; Defender: MR; InVigor 5440: R.
Figure 3. Percentage of Leptosphaeria maculans infected seeds in canola samples with different level of Blackleg resistance. Level of resistance: S––susceptible; MS––moderately susceptible; R––resistant; MR––moderately resistant. Westar: S; Q2: MS; 72-65RR: R; Defender: MR; InVigor 5440: R.
Plants 05 00012 g003
Figure 4. Reactions of Westar seedlings to inoculum produced by admixture. Arrows indicate (a) lesions starting to form seven days after wounding, and (b) advanced tissue collapse accompanied by pycnidia formation 14 days after wounding.
Figure 4. Reactions of Westar seedlings to inoculum produced by admixture. Arrows indicate (a) lesions starting to form seven days after wounding, and (b) advanced tissue collapse accompanied by pycnidia formation 14 days after wounding.
Plants 05 00012 g004
Table 1. Summary of Blackleg isolates recovered and identified from canola seed lots collected from co-op sites across Western Canada in 2011.
Table 1. Summary of Blackleg isolates recovered and identified from canola seed lots collected from co-op sites across Western Canada in 2011.
SampleLocationLevel of Resistance aNumber of Isolates b
L. maculansL. biglobosaTotal
WestarVegreville, ABS133952
Q2 – Field 1 cVegreville, ABMS73946
Q2 – Field 2 cVegreville, ABMS04141
DefenderVegreville, ABMR22123
72-65 RRLloydminster, ABR44448
DefenderCarman, MBMR033
WestarCarman, MBS000
DefenderPlum Coulee, MBMR04747
WestarPlum Coulee, MBS30132162
DefenderRoland, MBMR033
WestarRoland, MBS033
45H29Brandon, MBR008
72-65 RRBrandon, MBR000
CDS10-053Brandon, MBN/A000
InVigor 5440Brandon, MBR000
InVigor 5440Brandon, MBR01212
DefenderN. Battleford, SKMR07777
SC2Canora, SKN/A0300300
SC7St Brieux, SKN/A11314
SC9-1Pelly, SKN/A011
SC9-2Pelly, SKN/A23032
CR47Springside, SKN/A033
DefenderN. Battleford, SKMR28789
SC1Canora, SKN/A0116116
BHSW2Birch Hills, SKN/A000
6110111072
a Blackleg resistance of canola varieties in some fields was evaluated using a rating scale of 0–5 based on internal infection on the cross-section of the stem base (Western Canada Canola/Rapeseed Recommending Committee). At least 100 stubbles per field were evaluated for Blackleg resistance. The average rating score (ARS) was transformed into level of resistance. Level of resistance: S––susceptible; MS––moderately susceptible; R––resistant; MR––moderately resistant; N/A––not available; b A total of 1000 seeds per sample were analyzed for seed infection; c Q2 seed samples were collected from different fields in Vegreville, AB, Canada.
Table 2. Seed and admixture infection of commercially grown canola dockage samples across Western Canada in 2012.
Table 2. Seed and admixture infection of commercially grown canola dockage samples across Western Canada in 2012.
SampleLocationLevel of Resistance aSeed Infection (%) bAdmixture Infection (%) c
L. maculansL. biglobosaL. maculansL. biglobosa
L150North Battleford, SKR0.20.2100
73-45 RRLloydminster, SKR0.20.2102
73-45 RRSpeers, SKR0.10.160
45H29Lloydminster, SKR0.10.1106
73-45 RRMarshall, SKR0.10.102
45S52Speers, SKMR0.20.280
9553Lloydminster, SKR0.40.220
43E02Grand Prairie, ABMR0000
73-45 RRRycroft, ABR0020
1012 RRGirouxville, ABR0002
5440Neepawa, MBR00.102
L130Griswold, MBR00.1310
NexeraJustice, MBN/A0000
5440Neepawa, MBR00170
73-45Oak River, MBN/A0.1000
5440Dauphine, MBN/A0.10130
HEARSouris, MBN/A0080
INVIGORMinnedosa, MBN/A0020
DDuff, SKN/A0000
D2Duff, SKN/A0000
71-45St. Paul, ABMR0000
INV5020Mallaig, ABR00.100
6040 RRLloydminster, SKR0002
1012 RRDouglas, MBR0002
1841 RRLloydminster, SKR0002
INV5440Justice, MBR0000
INV5020Mallaig, ABR00120
INV5020ABR00.100
INV5440ABR0000
6060 RRJustice, MBR00.200
CI-NexeraJustice, MB-00.100
5440St. Benedict, SKR00.100
45H29Cudworth, SKR0000
72-65St. Benedict, SKR0000
K ABN/A0000
LABN/A0000
M ABN/A0000
Cargill 4 SKN/A001010
a Blackleg resistance of canola varieties in some fields was evaluated using a rating scale of 0–5 based on internal infection on the cross-section of the stem base (Western Canada Canola/ Rapeseed Recommending Committee). Blackleg rating: S––susceptible; MS––moderately susceptible; R––resistant; MR––moderately resistant; N/A––not available. At least 100 stubbles per field were evaluated for Blackleg resistance. The average rating score (ARS) was transformed into level of resistance; b A total of 1000 seeds per site were analyzed for seed infection; c A total of 100 individual DNA samples per admixture sample were analyzed.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernando, W.G.D.; Zhang, X.; Amarasinghe, C.C. Detection of Leptosphaeria maculans and Leptosphaeria biglobosa Causing Blackleg Disease in Canola from Canadian Canola Seed Lots and Dockage. Plants 2016, 5, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants5010012

AMA Style

Fernando WGD, Zhang X, Amarasinghe CC. Detection of Leptosphaeria maculans and Leptosphaeria biglobosa Causing Blackleg Disease in Canola from Canadian Canola Seed Lots and Dockage. Plants. 2016; 5(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants5010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernando, W. G. Dilantha, Xuehua Zhang, and Chami C. Amarasinghe. 2016. "Detection of Leptosphaeria maculans and Leptosphaeria biglobosa Causing Blackleg Disease in Canola from Canadian Canola Seed Lots and Dockage" Plants 5, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants5010012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop