Next Article in Journal
Root-Specific Signal Modules Mediating Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Fruit Crops
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Management of a Novel Brown Spot Disease in Plums (Prunus salicina Lindl.)
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolutionary Genomics III
Previous Article in Special Issue
ALKBH1L Is an m6A Demethylase and Mediates PVY Infection in Nicotiana benthamiana Through m6A Modification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Multifaceted Functions of Plant Asparagine Synthetase: Regulatory Mechanisms and Functional Diversity in Growth and Defense

1
College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Key Laboratory of Pests Comprehensive Governance for Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Haikou 571101, China
3
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River (Ministry of Education), Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2026, 15(3), 362; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030362 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 December 2025 / Revised: 20 January 2026 / Accepted: 22 January 2026 / Published: 24 January 2026

Abstract

Asparagine synthetase (AS) is a key enzyme in plant nitrogen metabolic network. Beyond its canonical role as a major nitrogen transport and storage molecule, asparagine also serves critical functions in plant immunity and tolerance to environmental stresses. This review systematically summarizes the characteristics of the core AS-mediated asparagine biosynthesis pathway and two other minor pathways in plants. It details the distribution of the AS gene family, protein structure, and evolutionary classification. The mechanisms governing AS expression are analyzed, revealing tissue-specific patterns and precise regulation by nitrogen availability, abiotic stresses, and exogenous hormones, mediated through an interactive network of cis-acting elements and transcription factors. Furthermore, the biological functions of AS are multifaceted: it influences plant biomass and nitrogen use efficiency by regulating nitrogen uptake, transport, and recycling during growth and development; it contributes to abiotic stress tolerance by synthesizing asparagine to maintain cellular osmotic balance and scavenge reactive oxygen species; and it indirectly enhances antibacterial and antiviral capacity by activating the SA signaling pathway and modulating programmed cell death. Current knowledge gaps remain regarding the crosstalk between AS-mediated signaling pathways, the upstream transcriptional regulatory network, and the balance between nitrogen utilization and disease resistance in crop breeding. Future research aimed at addressing these questions will provide a theoretical foundation and molecular targets for improving crop nitrogen use efficiency and breeding resistant cultivars.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen is essential for plant growth, influencing plant development and crop yield. Within the complex nitrogen metabolic network, the efficient assimilation, long-distance transport, and effective remobilization of nitrogen are critical physiological processes. Among various nitrogen carriers, asparagine (Asn) stands out due to its high nitrogen-to-carbon ratio and remarkable stability, making it a principal molecule for nitrogen transport via the phloem and nitrogen storage in many plant species [1,2].
The biosynthesis of Asn in plants is primarily catalyzed by AS, which utilizes energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to transfer the amide group from glutamine (Gln) to aspartate (Asp), yielding Asn and Glu (Glu) [3]. AS is a catalytic enzyme that is ubiquitously present in plants, animals, and microorganisms. Among its isoforms, AS-B is uniquely found in plants [4,5]. This enzyme utilizes the energy from ATP hydrolysis and employs glutamine as nitrogen sources to convert aspartate and glutamine into Asn and Glu [6,7,8]. Recent research on As in plants has predominantly centered on three key areas: (i) nitrogen mobilization during seed germination [9,10]; (ii) nitrogen transport and redistribution during plant growth [11]; (iii) nitrogen remobilization between sink and source tissues during plant senescence [1,12]. These findings underscore the pivotal role of AS in the transport and distribution of nitrogen throughout plant development. Although current research indicates that AS possesses these diverse functions, many underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The specific molecular mechanisms of AS in plant responses to abiotic stress are not fully elucidated, and emerging reports on its role in antiviral defense similarly lack detailed molecular explanations.
This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on the multifaceted functions of plant As, with a specific focus on the AS-B isoform. We will begin by outlining the enzymatic pathways of asparagine synthesis and the structural classification of AS enzymes. We will then delve into the complex transcriptional regulation of AS-B genes. A major focus will be placed on discussing the emerging roles of AS-B in coordinating plant development, abiotic stress tolerance, and biotic stress resistance. Finally, we will highlight critical unresolved questions and propose future research directions to unravel the sophisticated mechanisms by which this key metabolic enzyme orchestrates the plant growth-defense balance. Synthesizing this information is crucial for exploring the potential of AS-B as a strategic target for breeding crops with enhanced nitrogen use efficiency and resilience (Figure 1).

2. Biosynthesis Pathways of Asparagine in Plants

The biosynthesis of Asn in plants primarily occurs through three pathways: (1) The primary route involves AS, which is ATP-dependent and transfers the amide group from glutamine or ammonium to aspartate, generating Asn and Glu. This pathway is the major source of Asn in plants [13]. In this process, AS-B first activates the amide group of Gln, which is then transferred to the amide group of Asn via AS, ultimately forming Glu and Asn. The Asn produced via this pathway has a high nitrogen-to-carbon ratio and is chemically stable, serving as the core form for long-distance nitrogen transport within the plant and is translocated via the phloem to young tissues to support growth requirements. (2) The cyanide detoxification-associated pathway: Cyanide reacts with cysteine under the catalysis of β-cyanoalanine synthase to produce β-cyanoalanine, which is then hydrolyzed by β-cyanoalanine hydratase to yield Asn and a small amount of ammonia. The primary function of this pathway is to detoxify accumulated cyanide in plants, rather than being a major synthesis route for Asn [14]. (3) The reversible transamination reaction in peroxisomes: Asn and a 2-oxoacid react under the catalysis of asparagine-oxoacid transaminase to produce 2-oxosuccinamate and another amino acid. This process occurs in peroxisomes and is hypothesized to be related to photorespiratory nitrogen metabolism; it is a reversible reaction. However, minimal Asn in plants is synthesized via this route. Plant Asn synthesis predominantly relies on the first pathway, with the latter two playing minor roles only under specific physiological conditions [2].

3. Structure and Classification of Asparagine Synthetase

AS is distributed in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes [15,16], typically encoded by small gene families and widely present in plants [17,18]. AS genes have been successively reported in various plants: three in Arabidopsis thaliana, two in rice (Oryza sativa), five in wheat (Triticum aestivum), two in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and four in Nicotiana benthamiana, with corresponding genes identified in other species (C. Liu [19]. Based on structural characteristics, AS is mainly classified into two types: ammonium-dependent AS-A (EC 6.3.1.1) and glutamine-dependent AS-B (EC 6.3.5.4) (Lomelino et al., 2017 [3]; Shi et al., 1997 [20]). AS-A is primarily found in prokaryotes, while AS-B is distributed in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. AS-A is encoded by the asnA gene, uses NH4+ as the sole amide donor and ATP as the energy source, and synthesizes Asn from aspartate. In contrast, AS-B, encoded by the asnB gene, can utilize either NH4+ or Gln to synthesize Asn.
The AS-B protein consists of two domains that coordinate to complete the catalytic reaction: an N-terminal glutamine amidetransferase domain and a C-terminal synthetase domain. The glutamine amidetransferase domain is primarily responsible for recognizing and binding glutamine, dissociating its amide group, and transferring it to the catalytic center. This functionality is a key feature distinguishing AS-A from AS-B. The synthetase domain primarily provides binding sites for ATP and aspartate, supplies energy for the amide group transfer, receives the amide group, and ultimately facilitates the formation of reaction products. Currently cloned AS-B genes from plants show high amino acid sequence homology, reaching approximately 80% or even higher (Lomelino et al., 2017) [3], with the highest homology observed in the glutamine amidetransferase and synthetase domains. All plant AS-B proteins contain the glutamine amidetransferase domain, hence they are classified as glutamine-dependent AS-B (Lam et al., 1994) [21]. The synthetase domain contains three conserved residues, Cys1, His101, and Asp29, which participate in the transamination function involving Gln (Mei & Zalkin, 1989 [22]).
AS in plants is essentially all AS-B. Based on amino acid sequence homology and evolutionary relationships, they can be further divided into two types: Class I and Class II, with each subclass divisible into dicot and monocot subgroups [23]. Class I is found in both dicots (e.g., Arabidopsis, soybean) and monocots (e.g., rice, wheat), while Class II is primarily found in monocots (e.g., rice, wheat). To date, AS-B genes have been reported and cloned from numerous plants. The encoded protein sequences typically consist of 579–591 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 65 kDa, and their functions are being progressively reported. Furthermore, AS-B amino acid sequences exhibit high homology across different plant species (Figure 2), with differences mainly manifesting in the last 30–40 amino acids at the C-terminus [24].

4. Expression Characteristics of Asparagine Synthetase Genes

The structural features of AS proteins are closely related to their expression regulation and physiological functions. The N-terminal glutamine amidotransferase domain and the C-terminal synthetase domain contained in the AS-B protein not only determine its catalytic mechanism (relying on glutamine as the amide donor) but may also influence its subcellular localization, stability, and interactions with regulatory proteins. For example, conserved residues within these domains (such as Cys1, His101, and Asp29) are crucial for enzymatic activity and substrate specificity, which may serve as the functional basis for the differential expression of different AS isozymes in specific tissues or under stress conditions. Furthermore, AS proteins classified into Class I and Class II based on sequence homology and evolutionary relationships may possess differentiated cis-acting elements in their promoter regions, allowing them to respond to distinct endogenous signals or environmental stresses, ultimately leading to divergent expression patterns. Therefore, the structural classification of AS not only reflects differences in catalytic properties but also provides a molecular basis for its differential expression during development and under stress conditions. The expression of As genes in plants exhibits variation not only among different species but also across different tissues within the same species, and it can be induced by external environmental cues [25]: Typically, AS-B gene expression is high in young, metabolically active tissues with high nitrogen demand, such as root tips, shoot apices, and young leaves [17,26]. Abundant AS-B transcripts are found in root meristematic cells and shoot apices of Arabidopsis, supporting the high nitrogen demand for rapid cell division and elongation [17]. Rice OsASN1 is highly expressed in mesophyll cells, promoting carbon–nitrogen balance [27]; mulberry MaAS expression peaks in female flowers during full bloom, potentially related to pollen development and ovule formation; wheat TaASN2 expression increases during late seed development, participating in nitrogen transport, while expression is lower in mature tissues like old leaves [28,29]. Asn, synthesized by AS-B, serves as a crucial nitrogen transport and storage form, providing sufficient nitrogen for cell division, elongation, and construction in young tissues, ensuring rapid growth and development [30]. In leaf tissues, AS-B expression is concentrated in mesophyll cells, particularly those surrounding vascular bundles. These cells are involved in both CO2 fixation/carbohydrate synthesis during photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism. AS-B expression here helps integrate photosynthetic carbon skeletons with nitrogen to synthesize Asn, achieving carbon–nitrogen balance and facilitating the transport of excess nitrogen to other tissues. In contrast, AS-B expression is relatively low in mature tissues like old leaves and stem bases, due to reduced growth rates, lower nitrogen demand, and diminished nitrogen metabolic activity [11].
Changes in the external growth environment significantly influence AS-B gene expression levels, primarily involving nitrogen stress, drought and osmotic stress, low-temperature and oxidative stress, heavy metals, nutrient deficiencies, and exogenous hormone signaling. Regarding nitrogen transport, ample external nitrogen sources promote AS-B expression in roots and shoots [27]. In Arabidopsis, exogenous organic nitrogen sources induce AtASN1 mRNA levels, while AtASN2 expression shows no significant difference [21]. Transferring soybean roots from nitrate medium to nitrogen-free medium significantly reduces the expression of As-related genes, whereas returning them to nitrate medium restores expression to previous levels, indicating nitrate induction of ASN gene expression in soybean roots [31]. In rice hydroponic experiments, increasing nitrate or ammonium concentrations significantly elevates ASN-B transcript levels in roots and leaves, increasing asparagine synthesis, which helps convert excess nitrogen into Asn for storage, preventing waste or toxicity. Conversely, under nitrogen deficiency, plants finely regulate AS-B expression for efficient nitrogen use: upregulating AS-B in roots prioritizes limited nitrogen for asparagine synthesis and transport to shoots, while partially suppressing AS-B expression in shoots reduces unnecessary nitrogen consumption, ensuring supply to actively growing tissues [27].
Beyond nitrogen, other environmental stresses affect AS-B expression. Under drought stress, AS-B expression alters in many plants. For example, wheat leaves show rapid upregulation of AS-B expression during drought, likely because water deficit increases osmotic stress, and increased synthesis of Asn, an important osmolyte, helps maintain cellular osmotic balance and protect against damage. Accumulated Asn also provides a nitrogen source for recovery post-stress [32]. Under low-temperature stress, rapeseed AS-B expression is upregulated, enhancing frost resistance, as Asn accumulation promotes synthesis of ice-inhibition substances and antioxidants, reducing intracellular ice formation risk and mitigating damage [33]. Osmotic stress and exogenous ABA also induce wheat ASN1 transcription, suggesting salt and osmotic stress induction may involve ABA signaling, though the precise mechanism affecting hormone signaling remains unelucidated [34]. Mulberry MaAS is upregulated under salt stress, potentially via an ABA-dependent pathway activating the ABRE element in its promoter [35]; NbASN expression in N. benthamiana significantly increases upon H2O2 treatment, generating Asn to scavenge ROS and reduce damage [2]; tobacco root ASN expression significantly increases under boron deficiency, primarily functioning to maintain cell wall structure [36,37]. Regarding exogenous hormones, ethylene treatment of soybean leaves significantly increases AS-B transcript levels and Asn accumulation by more than half; ethylene likely enhances AS-B expression by activating EIN3/EIL1 transcription factor activity, which binds the ERE element in the AS-B promoter [38,39].
In summary, AS gene expression is influenced by external environmental stresses and exhibits internal tissue specificity, underscoring its importance in plant growth and development. The molecular mechanisms underlying stress-induced differential expression of AS-B remain unclear. Current reports indicate regulation primarily through promoter cis-acting elements and transcription factor networks: the wheat TaASN2 promoter contains an NRE motif bound by NLP transcription factors, regulating its transcription [40,41]; the rice OsAS1 promoter contains DRE and HSE elements responsive to drought and heat, binding DREB and HSF transcription factors, thus activating ASN expression under stress [42]; similarly, the mulberry MaAS promoter contains ABRE, ERE, and SARE elements responsive to ABA, ethylene, and SA, respectively, influencing AS-B transcription [38]; Arabidopsis NLP7 directly activates AtASN1 expression, regulating nitrogen signaling, while mustard MsILR3 binds the G-box element in the MsMIOX2 promoter, indirectly affecting AS-B expression [43,44].

5. Biological Functions of Asparagine Synthetase Genes

5.1. The Asparagine Synthetase Gene Modulates Plant Growth and Development

As is a key node in the plant nitrogen metabolic network. Its core function is catalyzing the synthesis of Asn from aspartate and glutamine, involved in nitrogen uptake, transport, and recycling [45]. During nitrogen uptake, when soil nitrogen sources (e.g., nitrate, ammonium) are limited, upregulated AS-B expression in roots promotes the conversion of scarce absorbed nitrogen into Asn. Due to its high N:C ratio and stability, Asn is efficiently transported via the phloem to actively growing shoot tissues (e.g., young leaves, shoot apices), meeting growth demands [30]; during nitrogen recycling, upon leaf senescence or nutrient deprivation, upregulated AS-B in senescing leaves converts amino acids from protein degradation (e.g., Glu, aspartate) into Asn, which is transported to seeds or new organs for reuse, minimizing nitrogen loss [46,47]. Thus, AS primarily influences seed germination and plant growth by affecting nitrogen transport and storage. Supported by theory, numerous studies have been reported. During seed germination, nitrogen stored as Asn is converted to Arg as a storage protein; upon germination, nitrogen from Arg is reactivated to Asn, promoting germination and growth [45]. ASN activity is barely detectable in dry mung bean seeds but increases significantly after imbibition, constituting most of the reduced nitrogen in cotyledons, increasing tens of times compared to controls [48]. In crops, ASN-B expression levels correlate positively with nitrogen use efficiency [45]. For example, transgenic rice overexpressing ASN-B under low nitrogen shows 15–20%, 10–15%, and 20–25% increases in biomass, grain yield, and nitrogen uptake efficiency, respectively, compared to wild-type, with significantly higher Asn levels. Superior AS-B alleles in wheat (e.g., promoter variants with an added NRE element) increase AS-B expression by over 30% under low nitrogen, significantly enhancing NUE compared to common alleles [49,50]. Mutation of OsASN1 in rice significantly reduces its expression and tiller bud number [8]. Additionally, osasn1 mutants show slight increase in shoot length and slight decrease in root length compared to wild-type [27]. These studies indicate AS genes are important candidates for improving NUE and reducing fertilizer use.
As an important form of nitrogen storage and long-distance transport in plants, asparagine is crucial for the growth and development of maize [51]. In rice, OsASN1 is essential for asparagine-dependent development, as its mutants exhibit changes in plant height, root length, and tiller number, along with a sharp decline in asparagine content, although total nitrogen uptake remains unaffected [5]. This suggests that ZmASN1 may play a similarly critical role in early growth, nutrient allocation, and reproductive development (such as grain formation) of maize. In Arabidopsis, the asparagine synthetase encoded by ASN1, expressed in floral organs, contributes to nitrogen filling in seeds [52].
During vegetative growth, plants allocate nitrogen assimilated and accumulated in source organs for protein synthesis during leaf expansion, tissue elongation, and seed development. Asp, Asn, Gln, and Glu are major nitrogen compounds in phloem sap, transported to sink tissues as nitrogen donors for new amino acid synthesis [17]. Arabidopsis lines overexpressing AtASN2 show enhanced growth phenotypes and increased expression in developing leaves and stems, but Asn levels are higher in sink organs (flowers, pods) than source organs (leaves, stems), due to enhanced transport of leaf-synthesized Asn via phloem to sinks. In contrast, asn mutants exhibit growth defects, NH4+ accumulation, reduced Asn in phloem sap, delayed yellowing, weakened Asn synthesis in sources, and impaired Asn phloem transport [2]. Thus, during vegetative stage, AtASN2 in Arabidopsis leaves participates in nitrogen assimilation and reloads synthesized Asn into the phloem for nitrogen redistribution to metabolic sinks [17]. In potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), Asn and Gln are preferentially utilized in developing leaves, playing a major role in nitrogen enrichment and redistribution in the phloem [53,54]. In various plant species, the assimilated nitrogen carriers are initially transported to the shoots via the xylem rather than the phloem: in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, nitrate assimilated by the roots is loaded into xylem vessels under the mediation of transporters such as NRT1.5 and directionally transported upward to the above-ground organs, including stems and leaves [55]; in gramineous crops such as wheat and rice, as well as dicotyledonous vegetables such as tomato and cucumber, organic nitrogen compounds (e.g., amino acids and amides) synthesized in the roots are also preferentially allocated from underground to above-ground parts through the xylem in the initial stage [56]; relevant physiological studies have further confirmed that the initial nitrogen transport pathway of field crops such as maize and soybean also conforms to this pattern, where the phloem only participates in nitrogen recycling and bidirectional translocation between sources and sinks in the subsequent stages [57]. Asn is a major free amino acid in potato tubers; isotopic labeling revealed tubers synthesize Asn directly via AS-B, rather than importing it from leaves [58], further confirming AS involvement in nitrogen assimilation. Loss of function of the rice RST1 gene, which directly suppresses the expression of aspartate synthetase 1 (OsAS1), increases OsAS1 expression, promotes aspartate production, avoids excess ammonium accumulation, and improves nitrogen utilization. RST1 underwent directional selection during domestication; the superior haplotype RST1Hap III reduces its transcriptional repression activity and contributes to salt tolerance and grain weight [8]. These studies demonstrate that AS genes enhance plant growth, development, and yield effects in different species primarily by influencing nitrogen synthesis and transport.

5.2. The Asparagine Synthetase Gene and Abiotic Stress in Plants

The expression of As genes is induced by various abiotic stresses, including “carbon starvation”, nitrogen stress/ammonium toxicity, nutrient deficiency, temperature stress, and heavy metal stress. Research shows varying response patterns of AS genes to stress across plants. In Arabidopsis, dark treatment rapidly induces ASN1 expression and Asn synthesis, and ASN1 is proven to be key in carbon starvation response. In sunflower, high salt, osmotic, and heavy metal stress induce expression of HAS1 and HAS1.1, but not HAS2 [59]. Similarly, rice OsAS1 expression is induced by salt and osmotic stress, while OsAS2 shows no significant difference. Further research revealed that upregulation of OsAS1 under salt stress is primarily regulated by the transcription factor RST1, which binds the OsAS1 promoter and represses its expression; salt stress alleviates this repression, leading to OsAS1 upregulation [8,60]. These results indicate that under drought and salt stress, not only does osmotic stress reduce carbon fixation, but the stress itself directly or indirectly increases ASN expression, primarily for nitrogen redistribution to maintain cellular osmotic pressure balance and nitrogen homeostasis [61,62]. When ammonium is the sole N source or nitrification is inhibited, ammonium accumulates in plants, leading to toxicity. ASN, utilizing Gln or NH4+ as donors to synthesize Asn, serves as a key enzyme for ammonium assimilation and detoxification. In rice and Arabidopsis, ammonium accumulation significantly increases ASN gene expression, generating Asn to reduce free ammonium concentration and alleviate cytotoxicity [63,64]. In tobacco, AS-B expression is significantly upregulated under boron deficiency, mainly concentrated in roots, with no significant change in leaves, suggesting soluble boron deficiency may specifically regulate root AS-B expression. Additionally, AS-B expression changes significantly under drought and low temperature in tobacco [65]. These findings indicate AS participates in plant responses to different stresses with diverse biological functions. The specific regulatory mechanisms for tissue-specific ASN expression differences under various stresses primarily involve: (1) Maintaining nitrogen remobilization and utilization: Under stress, protein synthesis decreases while degradation increases, releasing free amino acids. Asn reincorporates nitrogen from these into Asn, allowing nitrogen transfer from senescing or stressed tissues to actively growing tissues, providing nutrients for repair and reproduction while reducing waste [66]. (2) Involvement in osmotic adjustment and ROS balance: Glu serves as the primary precursor for the biosynthesis of glutathione (GSH), a major cellular antioxidant. The revised text delineates this process: stress-induced AS activity elevates Glu production, which in turn fuels the glutathione biosynthesis pathway (Glu-Cys-Gly) [67]. The enhanced GSH pool bolsters the cellular capacity for ROS scavenging via the ascorbate–glutathione cycle, thereby mitigating oxidative damage [68]. Concurrently, stress-induced upregulation of AS supplies increased substrate (Glu) for the proline-synthesizing enzymes P5CS and P5CR, leading to proline accumulation. Proline functions as a potent and well characterized osmoprotectant that stabilizes proteins and cellular structures under osmotic stress [69,70]. Asn-mediated nitrogen metabolism reprograms the supply of precursors for other osmolytes like proline, indirectly affecting NO and ROS metabolism, mitigating oxidative damage [71]. (3) Integrating stress metabolic pathways: ASN expression is regulated by multiple transcription factors core to key stress-signaling pathways. Under carbon starvation, ASN1 expression is regulated by bZIP transcription factors; under drought, the ASN promoter region can be recognized by AREB/ABF factors [72], leading to transcriptional activation or repression, further influencing AS expression (Figure 3).
In summary, AS expression under diverse abiotic stresses converges on a few core regulatory nodes that link environmental perception to metabolic adaptation. Firstly, nitrogen signaling is a primary driver, where transcription factors like NLP directly activate ASN genes in response to nitrogen status, facilitating ammonium detoxification and remobilization. Secondly, hormone- and stress-responsive transcription factors serve as key integrators: ABF/AREB proteins mediate ABA-dependent regulation during drought and osmotic stress; DREB proteins and HSFs link AS expression to dehydration and temperature extremes, respectively; and RST1-like repressors modulate salt-responsive expression. Thirdly, redox signaling, often involving H2O2, induces ASN expression, aligning nitrogen metabolism with the need for antioxidant synthesis. Ultimately, these regulatory inputs funnel through the AS enzyme to execute three pivotal downstream functions: (1) nitrogen recycling and transport, (2) osmotic adjustment via Asn and its derivative proline, and (3) reinforcement of antioxidant and defense hormone SA pathways via Glu provision. Thus, AS acts as a central metabolic effector positioned at the intersection of multiple stress-signaling networks, enabling coordinated resource reallocation toward stress tolerance.

5.3. Asparagine Synthetase Gene in Bacterial Infection

Similarly, a Zhejiang University team found that 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (2,4-DTBP) secreted by the symbiotic fungus Aspergillus cvjetkovicii activates the AS-B-mediated nitrogen metabolism pathway, enhancing rice resistance to Rhizoctonia solani. This phyllosphere symbiont–plant pathogen interaction, mediated by chemical signals regulating AS-B, provides new insights into AS-B’s ecological role and potential for developing microbial agents [73]. Expressing the Physcomitrium patens ASN gene in Arabidopsis increases Asn content and reduces bacterial (Pseudomonas syringae) growth compared to controls [30]. Subsequent *asn1/asn2* double mutants show increased susceptibility and enhanced bacterial multiplication, indicating AS genes positively regulate resistance against P. syringae in Arabidopsis [74]. In tomato, silencing SLASN reduces resistance to P. syringae; mechanistic studies revealed lower SA levels and downregulated SA pathway genes in mutants, explaining how AS-B enhances resistance via SA signaling [75]. Beyond hormones, silencing OsAS1 in rice reduces ROS burst upon pathogen inoculation, indicating AS-B is essential for early defense responses [76]. These studies suggest AS-B does not directly inhibit pathogen growth but acts as an intermediary affecting downstream defense signaling or integrates nutrient signals to coordinate resource allocation towards defense, indirectly impacting pathogen growth.

5.4. The Asparagine Synthetase Gene Confers Virus Resistance in Plants

AS primarily catalyzes the synthesis of Asn and Glu from Asp and Gln in plants. Previously, research focused on its roles in growth, nitrogen metabolism, abiotic stress, and antibacterial defense, with few reports on antiviral activity. However, advancing techniques and pathway elucidation have revealed new functions. Evidence suggests Asn and Glu participate in antiviral defense. In N. benthamiana, NbAS-B accumulation enhances resistance to Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV); mechanistic analysis suggests substrates Asn and Glu can modulate the SA pathway, TMV infection induces SA pathway genes like PR1 and PR2, enhancing resistance. Our lab found that the other catalytic product, Glu, is crucial for SA pathway function in this context. Inhibiting Glu with DFMTI abolished the antiviral effect of AS-B, indicating dependence on Glu-induced SA signaling [19]. The relationship between Glu and SA involves two SA biosynthesis pathways: the isochorismate synthase (ICS) and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) pathways [77,78], both starting from chorismate in chloroplasts. (1) PAL pathway: Isotope labeling in tobacco showed Phe conversion via trans-cinnamic acid (t-CA) and benzoic acid to SA, catalyzed by PAL and AIM1, with benzoic acid potentially being hydroxylated by an unidentified BA2H. (2) ICS pathway: Chorismate is converted to isochorismate by ICS1, then requires EDS5 (transport to cytoplasm) and PBS3 (an aminotransferase). PBS3, with key residues for Glu-binding (Lys428, Lys146), Mg2+-binding (Glu329), and ATP/AMP interaction (Ser328, Asp398, Lys550), catalyzes the formation of an isochorismate-9-Glu adduct (ISC-9-Glu), which spontaneously decomposes or is catalyzed by EPS1 to produce SA [79,80,81,82,83] (Figure 4). While PAL is prominent in rice/tobacco and ICS in Arabidopsis, both may operate to varying degrees in different plants. Suppressing ICS homologs in tomato and N. benthamiana reduces SA accumulation [84,85,86], but ICS pathway evidence outside Brassicaceae needs strengthening.
Additionally, mechanical damage or herbivory releases Glu from damaged cells, creating a gradient that activates Glu receptor-like (GLR) channels, leading to Ca2+ influx and membrane potential changes, triggering downstream responses [87]. In N. benthamiana, Glu binding to GLR3.3 induces Ca2+ influx, promoting SA signaling and immunity. Thus, Glu involvement in plant immunity primarily occurs through these two pathways, ultimately inducing SA signaling. Therefore, exploring the Glu-SA link in N. benthamiana is crucial for understanding Glu’s role in disease resistance.
AS balances plant growth and stress tolerance by functioning as a central metabolic node in nitrogen homeostasis, controlling the allocation and remobilization of nitrogen via Asn. Under favorable conditions, enhanced AS activity channels assimilated nitrogen into Asn, which is transported to sink tissues—such as meristems and developing seeds—to support protein synthesis and biomass accumulation, thereby promoting growth. Under stress, hormones such as ABA and SA reprogram AS expression, shifting its role toward stress adaptation. In this state, AS mediates: nitrogen remobilization and protection by retrieving nitrogen from degraded proteins and converting it to Asn for redistribution to defense or repair sites; and osmotic adjustment and defense synthesis, with Asn serving as a compatible osmolyte and its product Glu acting as a precursor for glutathione, proline, and SA, a key defense hormone. Thus, AS does not equally promote growth and stress resistance simultaneously, but rather acts as an environmentally responsive metabolic switch. Under optimal conditions, it directs nitrogen toward growth; under stress, it reallocates resources to defense and survival pathways. Notably, Glu production directly links AS activity to SA biosynthesis, establishing a molecular interface that integrates nitrogen metabolism with systemic disease resistance.
In addition to transcriptional and metabolic regulation, the activity, stability, and subcellular localization of AS may be precisely modulated by post-translational modifications, offering a rapid and reversible regulatory mechanism for cellular signal responses. Although direct evidence for PTMs of plant AS proteins remains limited, post-translational modifications are nevertheless an important factor influencing protein function. Phosphorylation represents a key potential mechanism for regulating AS function: kinases activated by energy-sensing pathways (e.g., SnRK1 under carbon starvation) or stress-activated MAPKs may phosphorylate AS, thereby affecting its catalytic efficiency, interaction with binding partners, or intracellular trafficking. Ubiquitination may be involved in AS protein turnover, mediated by E3 ubiquitin ligases responsive to hormonal signals (e.g., ABA, ethylene) or nitrogen status, leading to targeted degradation of AS via the 26S proteasome pathway and enabling rapid clearance when enzymatic activity is no longer required. Furthermore, redox-related modifications such as S-nitrosylation or cysteine oxidation under oxidative stress may transiently modulate AS activity, directly linking its function to cellular redox homeostasis. Integrating these potential PTM mechanisms with the aforementioned transcriptional regulatory networks could enable plants to establish a multi-layered, dynamic regulatory system for asparagine synthesis, thereby enhancing their agility in adapting to environmental changes.

6. Conclusions

AS, particularly the plant-specific AS-B isoform, functions as a pivotal metabolic integrator, orchestrating the fundamental trade-off between nitrogen utilization for growth and investment in stress resilience. Moving beyond its classic role in nitrogen transport and storage, AS-B emerges as a key regulatory node. Its enzymatic products—Asn for nitrogen distribution and Glu as a signaling precursor—directly couple nitrogen metabolism with defense activation, notably through supporting SA biosynthesis for pathogen resistance. Furthermore, AS-B expression is modulated by diverse abiotic stresses and hormones, enabling metabolic reprogramming that enhances stress adaptation. This positions AS-B as a central processor of internal nutrient status and external cues, dynamically allocating resources to optimize fitness. Future perspectives center on deciphering the precise molecular mechanisms controlling AS-B activity and spatial regulation. Harnessing this knowledge to engineer “smart” AS-B alleles that optimize the growth–defense balance under specific environments holds significant promise for developing resilient crops with improved nitrogen use efficiency and sustainable yield stability.

Author Contributions

G.Q., X.S., S.X., J.D., and Q.Y. participated in the writing and revision of this review. G.Q was primarily responsible for the writing, H.C. participated in revising the manuscript.while S.X. and J.D. were in charge of polishing the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (ZDYF2024XDNY167), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870147), the Innovation Fund for Graduate Students of Chongqing (CYB240123), and the Chongqing Municipal Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for under graduates (S202410635056, S202510635353).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

2,4-DTBP2,4-di-tert-butylphenol
ABAAbscisic acid
ABREABA-Responsive Element
AIM1Abnormal Inflorescence Meristem 1
AREB/ABFABRE-Binding Protein/Factor
ASAsparagine Synthetase
AsnAsparagine
AspAspartate
BA2HBenzoic Acid 2-Hydroxylase
DFMTIDifluoromethylthioimidazole-2-thione
DREDehydration-Responsive Element
DREBDehydration-Responsive Element Binding protein
ECEnzyme Commission number
EDS5Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 5
EPS1Enhanced Pseudomonas Susceptibility 1
GLRGlu Receptor-Like
GlnGlutamine
GluGlutamate
HSEHeat Shock Element
HSFHeat Shock Factor
ICSIsochorismate Synthase
NLPNIN-Like Protein
NRENitrogen-Responsive Element
NUENitrogen Use Efficiency
PALPhenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase
PBS3avrPphB Susceptible 3
PCDProgrammed Cell Death
PRPathogenesis-Related
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
SASalicylic Acid

References

  1. Araújo, W.L.; Tohge, T.; Ishizaki, K.; Leaver, C.J.; Fernie, A.R. Protein degradation—An alternative respiratory substrate for stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gaufichon, L.; Rothstein, S.J.; Suzuki, A. Asparagine Metabolic Pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 675–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lomelino, C.L.; Andring, J.T.; McKenna, R.; Kilberg, M.S. Asparagine synthetase: Function, structure, and role in disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 19952–19958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qu, C.; Hao, B.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, C.; Xu, Z.; Liu, G. Functional Research on Three Presumed Asparagine Synthetase Family Members in Poplar. Genes 2019, 10, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, L.; Qin, R.; Liu, T.; Yu, M.; Yang, T.; Xu, G. OsASN1 Plays a Critical Role in Asparagine-Dependent Rice Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 20, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Larsen, T.M.; Boehlein, S.K.; Schuster, S.M.; Richards, N.G.; Thoden, J.B.; Holden, H.M.; Rayment, I.I. Three-dimensional structure of escherichia coli asparagine synthetase B: A short journey from substrate to product. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 7330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  7. Boehlein, S.K.; Richards, N.G.; Schuster, S.M. Glutamine-dependent nitrogen transfer in Escherichia coli asparagine synthetase B. Searching for the catalytic triad. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 7450–7457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Deng, P.; Jing, W.; Cao, C.; Sun, M.; Chi, W.; Zhao, S.; Dai, J.; Shi, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, B.; et al. Transcriptional repressor RST1 controls salt tolerance and grain yield in rice by regulating gene expression of asparagine synthetase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2210338119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fait, A.; Angelovici, R.; Less, H.; Ohad, I.; Urbanczyk-Wochniak, E.; Fernie, A.R.; Galili, G. Arabidopsis seed development and germination is associated with temporally distinct metabolic switches. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 839–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Herrera-Rodríguez, M.B.; Maldonado, J.M.; Pérez-Vicente, R. Role of asparagine and asparagine synthetase genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) germination and natural senescence. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Herrera-Rodríguez, M.B.; Carrasco-Ballesteros, S.; Maldonado, J.M.; Pineda, M.; Aguilar, M.; Pérez-Vicente, R. Three genes showing distinct regulatory patterns encode the asparagine synthetase of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). New Phytol. 2002, 155, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hörtensteiner, S.; Feller, U. Nitrogen metabolism and remobilization during senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, X.; Li, S.; Wu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Bao, Z.; Qin, L.; Jin, Y.; et al. THP9 enhances seed protein content and nitrogen-use efficiency in maize. Nature 2022, 612, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Piotrowski, M.; Volmer, J.J. Cyanide metabolism in higher plants: Cyanoalanine hydratase is a NIT4 homolog. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Olea, F.; Pérez-García, A.; Cantón, F.R.; Rivera, M.E.; Cañas, R.; Avila, C.; Cazorla, F.M.; Cánovas, F.M.; de Vicente, A. Up-regulation and localization of asparagine synthetase in tomato leaves infected by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 770–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Canales, J.; Rueda-López, M.; Craven-Bartle, B.; Avila, C.; Cánovas, F.M. Novel insights into regulation of asparagine synthetase in conifers. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gaufichon, L.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Tcherkez, G.; Reisdorf-Cren, M.; Sakakibara, Y.; Hase, T.; Clément, G.; Avice, J.C.; Grandjean, O.; Marmagne, A.; et al. Arabidopsis thaliana ASN2 encoding asparagine synthetase is involved in the control of nitrogen assimilation and export during vegetative growth. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 328–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Osuna, D.; Gálvez, G.; Pineda, M.; Aguilar, M. RT-PCR cloning, characterization and mRNA expression analysis of a cDNA encoding a type II asparagine synthetase in common bean. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1445, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, C.; Tian, S.; Lv, X.; Pu, Y.; Peng, H.; Fan, G.; Ma, X.; Ma, L.; Sun, X. Nicotiana benthamiana asparagine synthetase associates with IP-L and confers resistance against tobacco mosaic virus via the asparagine-induced salicylic acid signalling pathway. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 60–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shi, L.; Twary, S.N.; Yoshioka, H.; Gregerson, R.G.; Miller, S.S.; Samac, D.A.; Gantt, J.S.; Unkefer, P.J.; Vance, C.P. Nitrogen assimilation in alfalfa: Isolation and characterization of an asparagine synthetase gene showing enhanced expression in root nodules and dark-adapted leaves. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1339–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lam, H.M.; Peng, S.S.; Coruzzi, G.M. Metabolic regulation of the gene encoding glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1994, 106, 1347–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mei, B.; Zalkin, H. A cysteine-histidine-aspartate catalytic triad is involved in glutamine amide transfer function in purF-type glutamine amidotransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 16613–16619. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cañas, R.A.; de la Torre, F.; Cánovas, F.M.; Cantón, F.R. High levels of asparagine synthetase in hypocotyls of pine seedlings suggest a role of the enzyme in re-allocation of seed-stored nitrogen. Planta 2006, 224, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Liang, C.; Wei, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Aspartate Aminotransferase Family in Brassica rapa and the Role of BraASP1 in Response to Nitrogen Starvation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lam, H.M.; Wong, P.; Chan, H.K.; Yam, K.M.; Chen, L.; Chow, C.M.; Coruzzi, G.M. Overexpression of the ASN1 gene enhances nitrogen status in seeds of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gálvez-Valdivieso, G.; Alamillo, J.M.; Fernández, J.; Pineda, M. Molecular characterization of PVAS3: An asparagine synthetase gene from common bean prevailing in developing organs. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ohashi, M.; Ishiyama, K.; Kojima, S.; Konishi, N.; Nakano, K.; Kanno, K.; Hayakawa, T.; Yamaya, T. Asparagine synthetase1, but not asparagine synthetase2, is responsible for the biosynthesis of asparagine following the supply of ammonium to rice roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Raffan, S.; Sparks, C.; Huttly, A.; Hyde, L.; Martignago, D.; Mead, A.; Hanley, S.J.; Wilkinson, P.A.; Barker, G.; Edwards, K.J.; et al. Wheat with greatly reduced accumulation of free asparagine in the grain, produced by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of asparagine synthetase gene TaASN2. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1602–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Curtis, T.Y.; Raffan, S.; Wan, Y.; King, R.; Gonzalez-Uriarte, A.; Halford, N.G. Contrasting gene expression patterns in grain of high and low asparagine wheat genotypes in response to sulphur supply. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wong, H.K.; Chan, H.K.; Coruzzi, G.M.; Lam, H.M. Correlation of ASN2 gene expression with ammonium metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Antunes, F.; Aguilar, M.; Pineda, M.; Sodek, L. Nitrogen stress and the expression of asparagine synthetase in roots and nodules of soybean (Glycine max). Physiol. Plant. 2008, 133, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Curtis, T.Y.; Bo, V.; Tucker, A.; Halford, N.G. Construction of a network describing asparagine metabolism in plants and its application to the identification of genes affecting asparagine metabolism in wheat under drought and nutritional stress. Food Energy Secur. 2018, 7, e00126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raza, A.; Su, W.; Hussain, M.A.; Mehmood, S.S.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Zou, X.; Lv, Y. Integrated Analysis of Metabolome and Transcriptome Reveals Insights for Cold Tolerance in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 721681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, H.; Liu, D.; Sun, J.; Zhang, A. Asparagine synthetase gene TaASN1 from wheat is up-regulated by salt stress, osmotic stress and ABA. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yoshida, T.; Mogami, J.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 21, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Quiles-Pando, C.; Rexach, J.; Navarro-Gochicoa, M.T.; Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; Herrera-Rodríguez, M.B.; González-Fontes, A. Boron deficiency increases the levels of cytosolic Ca(2+) and expression of Ca(2+)-related genes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 65, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beato, V.M.; Teresa Navarro-Gochicoa, M.; Rexach, J.; Begoña Herrera-Rodríguez, M.; Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; Kempa, S.; Weckwerth, W.; González-Fontes, A. Expression of root glutamate dehydrogenase genes in tobacco plants subjected to boron deprivation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 1350–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahn, G.; Ban, Y.J.; Shin, G.I.; Jeong, S.Y.; Park, K.H.; Kim, W.Y.; Cha, J.Y. Ethylene enhances transcriptions of asparagine biosynthetic genes in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) leaves. Plant Signal. Behav. 2023, 18, 2287883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Fang, X.; Gao, H.; Zhao, M.; He, S.; Song, B.; et al. The EIN3 transcription factor GmEIL1 improves soybean resistance to Phytophthora sojae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2024, 25, e13452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gaudinier, A.; Rodriguez-Medina, J.; Zhang, L.; Olson, A.; Liseron-Monfils, C.; Bågman, A.M.; Foret, J.; Abbitt, S.; Tang, M.; Li, B.; et al. Transcriptional regulation of nitrogen-associated metabolism and growth. Nature 2018, 563, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, K.H.; Liu, M.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Z.F.; Chen, B.; Liu, C.; Guo, A.; Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S.; Wagner, G.; et al. NIN-like protein 7 transcription factor is a plant nitrate sensor. Science 2022, 377, 1419–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lee, S.; Park, J.; Lee, J.; Shin, D.; Marmagne, A.; Lim, P.O.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; An, G.; Nam, H.G. OsASN1 Overexpression in Rice Increases Grain Protein Content and Yield under Nitrogen-Limiting Conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 1309–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guan, P.; Ripoll, J.J.; Wang, R.; Vuong, L.; Bailey-Steinitz, L.J.; Ye, D.; Crawford, N.M. Interacting TCP and NLP transcription factors control plant responses to nitrate availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2419–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Castaings, L.; Camargo, A.; Pocholle, D.; Gaudon, V.; Texier, Y.; Boutet-Mercey, S.; Taconnat, L.; Renou, J.P.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; Fernandez, E.; et al. The nodule inception-like protein 7 modulates nitrate sensing and metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 57, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lam, H.M.; Coschigano, K.T.; Oliveira, I.C.; Melo-Oliveira, R.; Coruzzi, G.M. The molecular-genetics of nitrogen assimilation into amino acids in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1996, 47, 569–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lam, H.M.; Hsieh, M.H.; Coruzzi, G. Reciprocal regulation of distinct asparagine synthetase genes by light and metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; Dechorgnat, J.; Chardon, F.; Gaufichon, L.; Suzuki, A. Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: Challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1141–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sodek, L. Distribution and Properties of a Potassium-dependent Asparaginase Isolated from Developing Seeds of Pisum sativum and Other Plants. Plant Physiol. 1980, 65, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Luo, J.; Hang, J.; Wu, B.; Wei, X.; Zhao, Q.; Fang, Z. Co-overexpression of genes for nitrogen transport, assimilation, and utilization boosts rice grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Crop J. 2023, 11, 785–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guo, M.; Wang, Q.; Zong, Y.; Nian, J.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Wang, T.; Gao, C.; Zuo, J. Genetic manipulations of TaARE1 boost nitrogen utilization and grain yield in wheat. J. Genet. Genom. 2021, 48, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Duff, S.M.G.; D’Mello, J.P.F. Asparagine Synthetase; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gaufichon, L.; Marmagne, A.; Belcram, K.; Yoneyama, T.; Sakakibara, Y.; Hase, T.; Grandjean, O.; Clément, G.; Citerne, S.; Boutet-Mercey, S.; et al. ASN1-encoded asparagine synthetase in floral organs contributes to nitrogen filling in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant J. 2017, 91, 371–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Muttucumaru, N.; Keys, A.J.; Parry, M.A.; Powers, S.J.; Halford, N.G. Photosynthetic assimilation of 14C into amino acids in potato (Solanum tuberosum) and asparagine in the tubers. Planta 2014, 239, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Teixeira, J.; Pereira, S.; Cánovas, F.; Salema, R. Glutamine synthetase of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Desiree) plants: Cell- and organ-specific expression and differential developmental regulation reveal specific roles in nitrogen assimilation and mobilization. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, H.; Yu, M.; Du, X.Q.; Wang, Z.F.; Wu, W.H.; Quintero, F.J.; Jin, X.H.; Li, H.D.; Wang, Y. NRT1.5/NPF7.3 Functions as a Proton-Coupled H(+)/K(+) Antiporter for K(+) Loading into the Xylem in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 2016–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Marschner, P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  57. Beevers, L. Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants; American Elsevier Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chawla, R.; Shakya, R.; Rommens, C.M. Tuber-specific silencing of asparagine synthetase-1 reduces the acrylamide-forming potential of potatoes grown in the field without affecting tuber shape and yield. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 913–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Herrera-Rodríguez, M.B.; Pérez-Vicente, R.; Maldonado, J.M. Expression of asparagine synthetase genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under various environmental stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, D. Deregulation of the OsmiR160 Target Gene OsARF18 Causes Growth and Developmental Defects with an Alteration of Auxin Signaling in Rice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Niu, L.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, W. Maize multi-omics reveal leaf water status controlling of differential transcriptomes, proteomes and hormones as mechanisms of age-dependent osmotic stress response in leaves. Stress Biol. 2024, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chaves, M.M.; Flexas, J.; Pinheiro, C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sulieman, S.; Tran, L.S. Asparagine: An amide of particular distinction in the regulation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation of legumes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2013, 33, 309–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Y.; Chen, X.; Qin, X.; Wen, X. Effect of post-silking drought on nitrogen partitioning and gene expression patterns of glutamine synthetase and asparagine synthetase in two maize (Zea mays L.) varieties. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 102, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Brears, T.; Liu, C.; Knight, T.J.; Coruzzi, G.M. Ectopic Overexpression of Asparagine Synthetase in Transgenic Tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 1285–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lea, P.J.; Azevedo, R.A. Nitrogen use efficiency. 1. Uptake of nitrogen from the soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010, 149, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, G.; Fang, Y.Z.; Yang, S.; Lupton, J.R.; Turner, N.D. Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Foyer, C.H.; Kunert, K. The ascorbate-glutathione cycle coming of age. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 2682–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kaikavoosi, K.; Kad, T.D.; Zanan, R.L.; Nadaf, A.B. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline augmentation in scented indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties through Δ(1)-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) gene transformation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 177, 1466–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Krishnan, N.; Dickman, M.B.; Becker, D.F. Proline modulates the intracellular redox environment and protects mammalian cells against oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 44, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bernard, S.M.; Habash, D.Z. The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogen assimilation and recycling. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baena-González, E.; Rolland, F.; Thevelein, J.M.; Sheen, J. A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature 2007, 448, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fan, X.; Matsumoto, H.; Xu, H.; Fang, H.; Pan, Q.; Lv, T.; Zhan, C.; Feng, X.; Liu, X.; Su, D.; et al. Aspergillus cvjetkovicii protects against phytopathogens through interspecies chemical signalling in the phyllosphere. Nat. Microbiol. 2024, 9, 2862–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Maaroufi-Dguimi, H.; Debouba, M.; Gaufichon, L.; Clément, G.; Gouia, H.; Hajjaji, A.; Suzuki, A. An Arabidopsis mutant disrupted in ASN2 encoding asparagine synthetase 2 exhibits low salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, Y.; Qin, L.; Zhao, J.; Muhammad, T.; Cao, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Y. SlMAPK3 enhances tolerance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) by regulating salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signaling in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, M.; Guo, Z.; Hu, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, F.; Chen, W.; Wang, W.; Ye, B.; Yang, Z.; Li, G.; et al. The multifunctional ascorbate peroxidase MoApx1 secreted by Magnaporthe oryzae mediates the suppression of rice immunity. Plant Cell 2025, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dempsey, D.A.; Vlot, A.C.; Wildermuth, M.C.; Klessig, D.F. Salicylic Acid biosynthesis and metabolism. Arab. Book 2011, 9, e0156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hartmann, M.; Zeier, J. N-hydroxypipecolic acid and salicylic acid: A metabolic duo for systemic acquired resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 50, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Holland, C.K.; Westfall, C.S.; Schaffer, J.E.; De Santiago, A.; Zubieta, C.; Alvarez, S.; Jez, J.M. Brassicaceae-specific Gretchen Hagen 3 acyl acid amido synthetases conjugate amino acids to chorismate, a precursor of aromatic amino acids and salicylic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 16855–16864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, W.; He, J.; Wang, X.; Ashline, M.; Wu, Z.; Liu, F.; Fu, Z.Q.; Chang, M. PBS3: A versatile player in and beyond salicylic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Torrens-Spence, M.P.; Bobokalonova, A.; Carballo, V.; Glinkerman, C.M.; Pluskal, T.; Shen, A.; Weng, J.K. PBS3 and EPS1 Complete Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis from Isochorismate in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 1577–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wu, J.; Zhu, W.; Zhao, Q. Salicylic acid biosynthesis is not from phenylalanine in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rekhter, D.; Lüdke, D.; Ding, Y.; Feussner, K.; Zienkiewicz, K.; Lipka, V.; Wiermer, M.; Zhang, Y.; Feussner, I. Isochorismate-derived biosynthesis of the plant stress hormone salicylic acid. Science 2019, 365, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Spoel, S.H.; Dong, X. Salicylic acid in plant immunity and beyond. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 1451–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Uppalapati, S.R.; Ishiga, Y.; Wangdi, T.; Kunkel, B.N.; Anand, A.; Mysore, K.S.; Bender, C.L. The phytotoxin coronatine contributes to pathogen fitness and is required for suppression of salicylic acid accumulation in tomato inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Catinot, J.; Buchala, A.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Métraux, J.P. Salicylic acid production in response to biotic and abiotic stress depends on isochorismate in Nicotiana benthamiana. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Toyota, M.; Spencer, D.; Sawai-Toyota, S.; Jiaqi, W.; Zhang, T.; Koo, A.J.; Howe, G.A.; Gilroy, S. Glutamate triggers long-distance, calcium-based plant defense signaling. Science 2018, 361, 1112–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the As-mediated regulatory network in nitrogen metabolism, stress tolerance, and immunity in plants. This figure was generated using AI tools (ChatGPT-4o) and manually refined to ensure scientific accuracy. Nitrogen Signaling: The NLP transcription factors (e.g., NLP7) directly activate ASN genes in response to nitrate/ammonium status. ABA Stress Signaling and ABRE/AREB Elements: Induction of ASN expression (e.g., TaASN1, MaAS) under drought and osmotic stress via ABA-dependent pathways and promoter ABRE elements is documented. ROS Signaling: H2O2−induced ASN expression (e.g., NbASN) and the role of AS in redox homeostasis through glutathione synthesis are established. SA Signaling: The catalytic product glutamate (Glu) from AS serves as a direct substrate for the ICS pathway of SA biosynthesis, linking AS activity to systemic acquired resistance. Growth vs. Stress Switch: The dual role of AS in promoting growth under optimal conditions and redirecting nitrogen to stress tolerance under adversity is supported by phenotypic analysis of mutants and overexpression lines across species.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the As-mediated regulatory network in nitrogen metabolism, stress tolerance, and immunity in plants. This figure was generated using AI tools (ChatGPT-4o) and manually refined to ensure scientific accuracy. Nitrogen Signaling: The NLP transcription factors (e.g., NLP7) directly activate ASN genes in response to nitrate/ammonium status. ABA Stress Signaling and ABRE/AREB Elements: Induction of ASN expression (e.g., TaASN1, MaAS) under drought and osmotic stress via ABA-dependent pathways and promoter ABRE elements is documented. ROS Signaling: H2O2−induced ASN expression (e.g., NbASN) and the role of AS in redox homeostasis through glutathione synthesis are established. SA Signaling: The catalytic product glutamate (Glu) from AS serves as a direct substrate for the ICS pathway of SA biosynthesis, linking AS activity to systemic acquired resistance. Growth vs. Stress Switch: The dual role of AS in promoting growth under optimal conditions and redirecting nitrogen to stress tolerance under adversity is supported by phenotypic analysis of mutants and overexpression lines across species.
Plants 15 00362 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of As genes from different species. NCBI accession numbers for different species: ZmASN1 (NP_001352587.1), SbASN2 (XP_020942651.1), OsASN2 (NP_001051086.1), TaASN3 (XP_044468791.1), ZmASN2 (NP_001350932.1), SbASN1 (XP_002465143.1), TaASN1 (XP_044479562.1), TaASN2 (XP_044492261.1), OsASN1 (NP_001059983.2), TaASN4 (XP_047302298.1), SbASN3 (XP_002465144.1), ZmASN3 (NP_001352588.1), ZmASN4 (XP_008664167.1), NbASB (XP_019500180.1), SLASB (XP_004247669.1), AtASN1 (NP_186807.1), GmAS2 (XP_003518214.1), AtASN2 (NP_186808.1), AtASN3 (NP_186809.1), and GmAS1 (XP_003518216.1) CaAS1 (XP_016559698.1).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of As genes from different species. NCBI accession numbers for different species: ZmASN1 (NP_001352587.1), SbASN2 (XP_020942651.1), OsASN2 (NP_001051086.1), TaASN3 (XP_044468791.1), ZmASN2 (NP_001350932.1), SbASN1 (XP_002465143.1), TaASN1 (XP_044479562.1), TaASN2 (XP_044492261.1), OsASN1 (NP_001059983.2), TaASN4 (XP_047302298.1), SbASN3 (XP_002465144.1), ZmASN3 (NP_001352588.1), ZmASN4 (XP_008664167.1), NbASB (XP_019500180.1), SLASB (XP_004247669.1), AtASN1 (NP_186807.1), GmAS2 (XP_003518214.1), AtASN2 (NP_186808.1), AtASN3 (NP_186809.1), and GmAS1 (XP_003518216.1) CaAS1 (XP_016559698.1).
Plants 15 00362 g002
Figure 3. Function of asparagine synthetase gene in plant abiotic stress.
Figure 3. Function of asparagine synthetase gene in plant abiotic stress.
Plants 15 00362 g003
Figure 4. Simplified scheme of possible pathways for the biosynthesis of SA in Arabidopsis: In Arabidopsis, SA is primarily synthesized via the isochorismate pathway. This review adds a key focus on the origin of Glu in plants, which can be produced through AS synthesis. Subsequently, Glu conjugates with isochorismate and, under the action of PBS3, generates isochorismate-9-Glu. The relevant enzymes and their abbreviations are as follows: Isochorismate Synthase (ICS), Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase (PAL), Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 5 (EDS5), avrPphB Susceptible 3 (PBS3), Enhanced Pseudomonas Susceptibility 1 (EPS1), Abnormal Inflorescence Meristem 1 (AIM1), and Benzoic Acid 2-Hydroxylase (BA2H). Adapted from [81].
Figure 4. Simplified scheme of possible pathways for the biosynthesis of SA in Arabidopsis: In Arabidopsis, SA is primarily synthesized via the isochorismate pathway. This review adds a key focus on the origin of Glu in plants, which can be produced through AS synthesis. Subsequently, Glu conjugates with isochorismate and, under the action of PBS3, generates isochorismate-9-Glu. The relevant enzymes and their abbreviations are as follows: Isochorismate Synthase (ICS), Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase (PAL), Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 5 (EDS5), avrPphB Susceptible 3 (PBS3), Enhanced Pseudomonas Susceptibility 1 (EPS1), Abnormal Inflorescence Meristem 1 (AIM1), and Benzoic Acid 2-Hydroxylase (BA2H). Adapted from [81].
Plants 15 00362 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, G.; Xiao, S.; Dong, J.; Yang, Q.; Che, H.; Sun, X. The Multifaceted Functions of Plant Asparagine Synthetase: Regulatory Mechanisms and Functional Diversity in Growth and Defense. Plants 2026, 15, 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030362

AMA Style

Qiao G, Xiao S, Dong J, Yang Q, Che H, Sun X. The Multifaceted Functions of Plant Asparagine Synthetase: Regulatory Mechanisms and Functional Diversity in Growth and Defense. Plants. 2026; 15(3):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030362

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiao, Gang, Siyi Xiao, Jie Dong, Qiang Yang, Haiyan Che, and Xianchao Sun. 2026. "The Multifaceted Functions of Plant Asparagine Synthetase: Regulatory Mechanisms and Functional Diversity in Growth and Defense" Plants 15, no. 3: 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030362

APA Style

Qiao, G., Xiao, S., Dong, J., Yang, Q., Che, H., & Sun, X. (2026). The Multifaceted Functions of Plant Asparagine Synthetase: Regulatory Mechanisms and Functional Diversity in Growth and Defense. Plants, 15(3), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030362

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop