Previous Article in Journal
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation and Different Phosphorus Fertilizer Levels Modulate Phosphorus Acquisition and Utilization Efficiency of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Saline-Alkali Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrating Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation: Mechanistic Study of the Anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Berberis hemsleyana Ahrendt Extract

Department of Medicament, College of Medicine, Xizang University, Lhasa 850001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2026, 15(1), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010115
Submission received: 26 November 2025 / Revised: 26 December 2025 / Accepted: 27 December 2025 / Published: 31 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemistry)

Abstract

Anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis mechanisms of Berberis hemsleyana bark extract remain to be elucidated, and the anti-inflammatory activity of its n-butanol fraction (BNB) in RAW264.7 cells—mediated through suppression of the NF-κB pathway—require further validation. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the crude extract from B. hemsleyana were determined against Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and bacterial protein leakage assays were used to evaluate its antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was applied to analyze the ethanol extract of B. hemsleyana bark, leading to the screening of 47 compounds. The antibacterial mechanisms of the compounds were predicted through Network Pharmacology analysis and Molecular docking. Anti-inflammatory activity mediated via the NF-κB pathway was verified using an LPS-induced RAW264.7 cell inflammatory model. Specifically, the BNB showed a significant antibacterial effect on P. gingivalis. Meanwhile, it was confirmed that this fraction damaged the bacterial cell membrane structure, leading to the leakage of intracellular proteins in bacteria and thus impairing their infectivity. Network pharmacology analysis and molecular docking results indicated that B. hemsleyana bark’s biologically active compounds (Calenduloside E, Limonin, Acanthoside B, Dihydroberberine) antibacterial activity by regulating cytokines and cell apoptosis, thereby coordinating the body’s microbial homeostasis and inflammation. Additionally, BNB significantly reduced the secretion of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 in vitro via the NF-κB pathway. The crude extract from the bark of B. hemsleyana has antibacterial and Anti-inflammatory activity. The n-butanol fraction showed a significant antibacterial effect on P. gingivalis.

1. Introduction

Berberis hemsleyana Ahrendt is distributed in Tibet, China, and grows in rock crevices at altitudes of 3660 to 4400 m. It has been traditionally used to treat dysentery with red mucus, jaundice, sore throat, conjunctivitis, and traumatic injuries in the Tibet region. It was revealed that Berberis genus plants possess pharmacological effects such as anti-inflammatory [1] and antioxidant properties [2]; furthermore, Berberis vulgaris and its constituent berberine reduce the production of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) [3].
To investigate the antimicrobial activity of the extract, five bacterial species were chosen. Candida albicans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans are common pathogenic bacteria found in the oral cavity [4]. S. aureusis is a common pathogen associated with a variety of inflammatory diseases and systemic infections [5]. P. gingivalis is a prevalent oral pathogen and the core pathogenic bacterium responsible for periodontitis. Modern research has revealed that it is closely associated with systemic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases and rheumatoid arthritis [6]. E. coli resides in the human intestinal tract. Drug-resistant and pathogenic strains of E. coli can cause severe diarrhea and even result in death [7]. C. albicans is one of the commensal fungi in the human oral cavity, but it can transform into a pathogenic bacterium under specific conditions, and it is present on human skin and the reproductive tract. When the immune system is weakened, C. albicans invades and damages the skin and mucous membranes, leading to keratinization, ulcers, and erythema [8]. S. mutans is widely recognized as a key oral microorganism responsible for progressive tooth destruction, serving as the primary pathogenic agent in the development of dental caries [9].
Macrophages are key cells in the immune system involved in inflammatory responses. When bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) triggers inflammation, macrophages are activated and express inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which catalyzes the production of nitric oxide (NO) from arginine. iNOS is closely associated with the inflammatory pathway NF-κB, an important pathway mediating nonspecific host defense mechanisms [10,11]. Activation of the TLR4 receptor on RAW264.7 cells by LPS leads to the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, accompanied by increased levels of phosphorylated IκB (p-IκB) and phosphorylated P65 (p-P65) within the cells. This ultimately results in elevated levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β and IL-6, contributing to the inflammatory response [12].
Screening for the bacteria that show higher susceptibility to the B. hemsleyana extract, and linking these strains to their respective diseases, serves as a basis for future research aimed at developing B. hemsleyana as a therapeutic agent for those diseases. This study will investigate the antibacterial capacity of B. hemsleyana and find the most antimicrobial solvent fraction for anti-inflammatory activity evaluation, while utilizing network pharmacology to predict the antibacterial mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

C. albicans (GDMCC NO. 2.178), E. coli (GDMCC NO. 1.1299), P. gingivalis (GDMCC NO. 1.1464), S. mutans (GDMCC NO. 1.530) and S. aureus (GDMCC NO. 1.1348) were purchased from the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC). RAW264.7 cells were cultured in a specialized medium obtained from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The positive control drug (Metronidazole) was a commercially available tablet product that was procured from Xinyi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ethanol, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol were procured from Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Defibrinated sheep blood (Sterile, JS26086) was purchased from Henan Jushi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Luria-Bertani broth medium (HB0128), tryptic soy agar medium (HB0177, TSA), tryptic soy broth medium (HB4114, TSB), and modified Sabouraud agar medium (HB0301) were obtained from Qingdao Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). The Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining solution for protein detection was procured from Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Radioimmunoprecipitation lysis buffer (RIPA), phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), MTT cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assay kit and BCA protein assay kits were purchased from Solaibo Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Primary antibodies, including mouse/rabbit TLR4 (AF7017), anti-P-P65 (AF2006), anti-P65 (BF8005), anti-P-IκB-α (AF2002), anti-IκB-α (AF5002), and B-actin, were procured from Affinity Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat immunoglobulin G (IgG) (ab150113) and rabbit anti-mouse IgG (ab150077) secondary antibodies were purchased from Abcam Plc. (Cambridge, UK).

2.2. Databases and Software

Databases and Software see Table 1.

2.3. Extraction of B. hemsleyana Barks

B. hemsleyana was collected from the surrounding areas of Lhasa. It was identified by Professor Zhuoma Dongzhi from the College of Medicine, Xizang University. Accurately weigh 200 g of B. hemsleyana barks, add 1600 mL of 70% ethanol, soak for 1 h, then perform ultrasonic extraction for 40 min three times. The extract was dried and then stored at 4 °C. A total of 20 g of the extract was suspended in 100 mL of water, and then sequentially extracted three times with equal volumes of petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol were dried and then stored at 4 °C. This extraction method adopts the commonly used extraction techniques in natural product research and selects ethanol as the solvent, with reference to Venanzoni et al. [13].

2.4. LC-MS Analysis of B. hemsleyana Extract

The experimental method refers to [14], and the detection conditions were determined after debugging based on the actual equipment and samples. Take the extract, add steel beads, place it in a grinder, and grind 6 times until it becomes a powder. Accurately weigh 50 mg of the powder, add 500 μL of 75% methanol-water solution (100 mg/mL), perform ultrasonic treatment for 30 min, then centrifuge at 17,000× g for 10 min. Collect the supernatant into a sample vial and load it onto the instrument for analysis. LC-MS conditions: Chromatographic Column (ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm); Phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water; Phase B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. Flow rate: 0.4 mL/min; temperature: 40 °C; injection volume: 4 μL. 0–1.5 min, A95%; 2.5 min, A90%; 14 min, A60%; 24 min, A5%; 27 min, A5%; 27.01 min, A95%; 30 min, A95%.
Mass spectral data were acquired using an AB 5600 TQ-TOF mass spectrometer controlled by Analyst TF 1.7 software (AB Sciex), based on the Information-Dependent Acquisition (IDA) function. In each data acquisition cycle, molecular ions with the highest intensity (exceeding 100) were selected to collect the corresponding tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data. The acquisition range was set to m/z 50–1200, and the collision energy was 30 eV. The parameters of the ESI ion source were set as follows: nebulizing gas pressure (GS1): 60 Psi; auxiliary gas pressure: 60 Psi; curtain gas pressure: 35 Psi; temperature: 550 °C; spray voltage: 5500 V (positive ion mode) or −4500 V (negative ion mode).

2.5. Agar Diffusion Method

The culture conditions for C. albicans are Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium at 30 °C for 24 h. E. coli is cultured in LB broth medium at 37 °C for 24 h. P. gingivalis is cultured in LB nutrient broth medium with 10% defibrinated sheep blood under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 36 h. S. mutans and S. aureus are cultured in TSA nutrient broth medium at 37 °C for 24 h. Prepare various culture media according to the instructions, add them to Petri dishes, and allow the media to solidify before uniformly spreading 100 μL of bacterial suspension on the surface. Use an 8.0 mm Oxford cup to punch holes in the test plate, inject 80 μL of the test sample (at a concentration of 2 mg/mL) into each hole, and incubate for 24 h or 36 h. Conduct the experiment in triplicate, with 2 mg/mL Metronidazole as the positive control. After the incubation period, use a vernier caliper to measure and record the diameter of the inhibition circle [15].

2.6. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

The sample was diluted to a concentration range of 0.25–100 mg/mL using the two-fold serial dilution method. Add 50 μL of the diluted bacterial/fungal suspension and 200 μL of the sample at different concentrations into a 96-well plate. S. aureus and E. coli were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, S. mutans and P. gingivalis were incubated in an anaerobic gas pack for 36 h, and C. albicans was incubated at 30 °C for 36 h. Observe the wells that remain clear—the corresponding concentration is defined as the MIC of the sample against the respective microorganism. During the cultivation of anaerobic bacteria, we utilize an anaerobic culture bag with an anaerobic gas-generating sachet, placed in a microbiological incubator to create an oxygen-free and constant-temperature environment at 37 °C for 36 h.
Aspirate 50 μL of the liquid separately from the drug-negative control wells (clear) and the two wells subsequent to the MIC well in the 96-well plate, and spread it on agar plates, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. Quantitative analysis was performed using the colony-forming unit (CFU) counting method. The MBC is defined as the lowest drug concentration at which the viable bacterial count after drug treatment is reduced to a threshold of 0.1% of the initial inoculum [16].

2.7. Membrane Permeability Assay

The activated P. gingivalis was cultured in a constant temperature shaker (37 °C, 220 rpm) for 6 h. Bacteria in the logarithmic growth phase were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The bacterial pellet was resuspended in an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to a final concentration of 1 × 108 CFU/mL. An equal volume of the B. hemsleyana n-butanol extract solution (BNB) was added, adjusting the final concentrations to 1/4 MIC (62.5 μg/mL), 1/2 MIC (125 μg/mL), MIC (250 μg/mL), 2 MIC (500 μg/mL), 4 MIC (1000 μg/mL), as well as Metronidazole (the positive control). The mixture was incubated in a shaker at 37 °C for 2 h and 4 h. The blank control group was treated with an equal volume of PBS. After the bacterial suspension was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter membrane, 2 μL of the filtrate was collected to determine the protein concentration using a BCA protein assay kit, with reference to the standard curve [17].

2.8. Biological Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Following the method of Chen et al. [18], BNB solution at the MIC concentration or PBS (control) was added to a suspension of P. gingivalis in the logarithmic growth phase (5 × 108 CFU/mL). After 6 h of incubation, the bacteria were centrifuged using a high-speed centrifuge (8000 rd/min). The pelleted bacteria were resuspended and washed three times with PBS. The samples were fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, 4 °C, for 4 h. Subsequently, they were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%) every time for 15 min, dried at the critical point with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) (BAL-TEC, CPD 030), and coated with gold. The sample morphology was observed using a Hitachi SU8010 ultra-high resolution field emission scanning electron microscope. Three samples were observed per group.

2.9. Prediction of Active Components and Disease Targets

The chemical components in B. hemsleyana extract were input into the PubChem database to obtain the SMILES format of compound structures. These structures were then submitted to the SwissTargetPrediction database to query the gene targets of drug action. Meanwhile, the gene targets collected from the TCMSP and ETCM databases were merged, and their names were standardized and unified using the UniProt database. Finally, the active component-target network diagram was constructed with Cytoscape 3.10.1 software.
In the UniProt and Gene Cards databases, using “antibacterial” and “antimicrobial” as keywords and restricting the species to Homo sapiens (human), human gene targets related to antibacterial and antimicrobial functions were obtained. A Venn diagram was drawn using Venny 2.1.0 [19].

2.10. Construction of Protein–Protein Interaction Network and Screening of Core Targets

The intersection 28 targets obtained in Section 2.9 were input into the STRING database for protein–protein interaction network analysis. Utilize the database within the website to interpret the connections of the target protein and screen for proteins with a node count > 10. The processed data were imported into Cytoscape 3.10.1 software, and target screening was performed based on degree values and other criteria, with simultaneous construction of the network diagram [19].

2.11. KEGG Pathway Analysis and GO Enrichment Analysis

The intersection genes were imported into the online Metascape platform to perform KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and GO functional analysis. Locate annotation tool Metascape. Upload the sequence file, select the corresponding species, and submit the task. The KEGG analysis results will identify the key mechanisms or pathways corresponding to the crucial proteins and perform enrichment analysis on the proteins associated with each pathway. The steps for GO analysis are consistent with this: it is necessary to select three different analysis modes, biological process (BP), molecular function (MF) and cellular component (CC) and then record the enrichment results. The obtained data were organized and input into the XiaoeBio website for visualization processing [19].

2.12. Molecular Docking

Major active compounds in SDF format were downloaded from the PubChem database, and the 3D structures of core target proteins were downloaded from the UniProt database. The PyMOL 2.5.0 software was used to remove water molecules and heteromolecules from the proteins. Docking was performed on the CB-DOCK2 platform. After docking, the binding energy was recorded, and PyMOL 2.5.0 software was used for molecular docking visualization, with the 3D structures output [20].

2.13. Cell Culture and Viability Assay

RAW264.7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with NEAA supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S). The cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment, with sub-culturing performed every 1 day. RAW264.7 cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/mL, with 100 μL of cell suspension added to each well. The plates were then incubated for 24 h. The cells were exposed to BNB either alone or at varying concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 μg/mL). The plates were returned to the incubator for another 24 h. Subsequently, a solution of 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, 2.5 mg/mL, 50 μL) was added to each well. After a 4 h incubation, formazan crystals were dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and the optical density (OD) was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm. The initial OD was recorded at the time of compound addition [21].

2.14. Measurement of Inflammatory Cytokines

The cells were exposed to BNB either alone or at varying concentrations (12.5, 25 and 50 μg/mL) for 24 h. Additionally, the cells received an extra treatment with LPS (1 μg/mL) for an additional 12 h. The concentration levels of the inflammatory factors IL-6 and IL-1β were confirmed successful model group establishment using reagent kits [21].

2.15. Western Blot Analysis

Protein expression of relevant targets was detected by Western blot. Total protein was quantified using the BCA method. RAW264.7 cell lysates (containing protease inhibitors) were fully lysed, and the proteins were separated using an SDS-PAGE system. Subsequently, the proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane via the wet transfer method. The membrane was then blocked with 5% skimmed milk in TBST for 1 h at room temperature. Following blocking, the membrane was incubated with a primary antibody (1:1000) at 4 °C overnight. Then the membrane was washed with TBST three times, followed by incubation with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 h at room temperature. After another three washes with TBST, the bands were visualized using an ECL chemiluminescence substrate. Band intensity was analyzed using ImageJ software. β-actin was used as the internal control, and the relative expression level of the target proteins was calculated as the ratio of the target protein band intensity to that of β-actin. Finally, GraphPad software was used to process the data [22].
Meanwhile, the proteins from the P. gingivalis experimental group were separated using the SDS-PAGE system, and the resulting gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue for observation.

2.16. Statistical Methods

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0 and GraphPad 9.5.0 statistical software. The antibacterial experiment was conducted with three independent replicates (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between groups were analyzed by an independent samples t-test, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Component Analysis of B. hemsleyana Extract

Total ion currents in positive and negative modes were subjected to comparative analysis of mass spectrometry data and identified using mass spectrometry databases. A total of 1083 compounds were detected, and 47 compounds were screened out using signal intensity, content proportion, and ppm < 5 as criteria, as shown in Table 2 and Figure S1.

3.2. Screening of Antibacterial Activity of B. hemsleyana Extract

The inhibitory activity of the ethanol extract of B. hemsleyana against common pathogenic bacteria, including C. albicans, E. coli, P. gingivalis, S. aureus and S. mutans, was investigated to explore the antibacterial activity of B. hemsleyana extract. It was found that B. hemsleyana extract exhibited significant inhibitory effects on P. gingivalis and S. aureus, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 3.
The anti-P. gingivalis activity of each extract fraction of B. hemsleyana is shown in Figure 2, Table 4 and Table 5. The results indicate that compared with the positive control drug Metronidazole, the petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol fractions of B. hemsleyana all exhibit certain inhibitory activity. Among them, the BNB showed the strongest inhibitory activity against P. gingivalis.

3.3. BNB Damages the Bacterial Cell Membrane of P. gingivalis

SEM was used to observe the effects of BNB on the morphology and structure of P. gingivalis. The results showed that BNB induced significant changes in the morphology of P. gingivalis in Figure 3. The untreated P. gingivalis exhibited a spherical cell morphology with an intact bacterial membrane, while the P. gingivalis treated with the BNB showed damaged bacterial membranes, along with rough, wrinkled, and irregular spherical surfaces. Meanwhile, in Figure 4, the effect of BNB on the cell membrane permeability of P. gingivalis indicated that the administration group had increased protein leakage, suggesting that the cell membrane was damaged. Moreover, the damage became more severe with the extension of administration time, thus demonstrating that BNB exhibited significant antibacterial activity. Concurrently, we observed via SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining that BNB may disrupt bacterial protein synthesis. Compared with the normal bacteria group, the protein bands in the BNB-treated group were fainter, a result that was also observed with the positive control drug, Metronidazole (Figure S2).

3.4. Collection of Action Targets of B. hemsleyana Extract

Through target screening and integration of the 47 identified compounds, a total of 538 gene targets were obtained in Figure 5. Based on these, a “drug-component classification-compound-gene target” network was constructed, consisting of 596 nodes and 1321 edges, indicating that B. hemsleyana extract exhibits multi-component and multi-target characteristics. The network structure revealed that node size and color intensity are positively correlated with the number of associated genes, visually reflecting the differential importance of various compounds and their classifications in target regulation.

3.5. Screening of Key Antibacterial Targets of B. hemsleyana

A total of 250 main antibacterial and antimicrobial targets of Homo sapiens were collected from the UniProt and Gene Cards databases. The action targets of the components of B. hemsleyana and human antibacterial gene targets were input into the Venny 2.1 website, resulting in 28 intersection genes, accounting for 3.7% of the union targets. The common targets of the drug and antibacterial activity were entered into the STRING database, and the associated genes were expanded to 54 genes. A protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the antibacterial targets of B. hemsleyana was constructed, and the data were imported into Cytoscape 3.10.1 software for mapping. The PPI network diagram consists of 54 nodes and 746 edges, with an adjusted p < 1.0 × 10−16, an average degree value of 27.6, and a clustering credibility value of 0.829. Topological property analysis was performed using CytoNCA, and 14 core targets were selected based on the criteria of degree > 35, betweenness unDir > 30.9, and closeness centrality > 0.7. Meanwhile, the STRING database indicated that CASP7, BIRC5, CDK9, STAT1, and RELA are intersection genes significantly associated with the core targets. Therefore, a total of 19 genes were obtained. After excluding the genes previously expanded using STRING from the 19 genes, 14 gene targets were finally identified, along with their corresponding compounds.
The integration of 250 human antibacterial targets with the predicted targets of B. hemsleyana extract components revealed 28 initial intersection genes. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis expanded this set to 54 genes, forming a highly interconnected network (746 edges) with significant reliability (p < 1.0 × 10−16). Topological analysis identified 14 core targets based on centrality metrics, and five key intersection genes (CASP7, BIRC5, CDK9, STAT1, RELA) were highlighted as significantly associated with core network functions, including inflammatory bowel disease and apoptosis. The final selection process yielded 14 high-confidence gene targets, which are proposed as the primary mediators of the antibacterial effects of B. hemsleyana extract, as shown in Figure 6A,B and Table 6.

3.6. Biological Function and Pathway Analysis

Based on KEGG and GO enrichment analyses, the potential antibacterial targets of B. hemsleyana extract were significantly enriched in 20 KEGG pathways, including apoptosis, primarily involving infectious diseases, immune regulation, and apoptotic processes. GO classification revealed enrichment in biological processes such as neuronal apoptosis and NF-κB signaling regulation, cellular components including mitochondrial and plasma membranes, and molecular functions such as kinase binding and cysteine-type endopeptidase activity. These results suggest that it may exert its multi-target antibacterial effects by regulating pathways related to apoptosis, immune-inflammatory responses, and pathogen infection, as shown in Figure 6C,D.

Molecular Docking Validation

Based on the values of relevant targets degree, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality, the frequency of active components, and the relevant literature, 17 active components including Calenduloside E, Tarasaponin VI, Cucurbitacin E, Echinacoside B, Hesperetin 7-O-neohesperidoside, Citric Acid, Luteolin, Dihydroberberine, Quercetin, Syringaresinol, Liriodendrin, Magnoflorine, Berbamine, Matrine, Aesculetin, and Betaine—were selected for molecular docking with 14 core targets (BCL2, BCL2L1, BIRC5, CASP1, CASP3, CASP7, CASP8, CASP9, CDK9, IL1B, MCL1, RELA, STAT1, and STAT3) (Figure 7). The lower the binding energy between the small molecule ligand and the protein receptor, the more stable the bound molecules, indicating a higher probability of intermolecular interactions. The docking results with the highest binding affinity were selected for visualization, in Figure 8 which are as follows: A. Calenduloside E—CASP3’s binding energy is −10 kcal·mol−1, B. Limonin—CASP1’s binding energy is −9.6 kcal·mol−1, C. Acanthoside B—CDK9’s binding energy is −10.9 kcal·mol−1, and D. Dihydroberberine—RELA’s binding energy is −9.6 kcal·mol−1. Then, the in vitro antibacterial activity of the four compounds was evaluated, and dihydroberberine demonstrated significant antibacterial activity (Figure S3).

3.7. BNB Reduces the Expression of Inflammatory Factors in LPS-Induced RAW264.7 Cell Inflammation

Cell viability assays indicated that BNB exhibited low cytotoxicity at concentrations below 100 μg/mL. Therefore, concentrations of 12.5 μg/mL, 25 μg/mL, and 50 μg/mL were selected as the low, medium, and high dose groups, respectively (Figure 9A), and the effect of SMS on the release of NO and inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) was assessed. Treatment with BNB inhibited the levels of NO, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 compared with the LPS group in a dose-dependent manner. Taken together, these results indicate that they reduce the release of inflammatory factors in vitro. BNB significantly suppressed the LPS-induced secretion of NO, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in RAW264.7 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, as shown in Figure 9B–E.

3.8. Effect of BNB on the Expression of NF-κB Pathway-Related Proteins in LPS-Induced RAW264.7 Cells

To assess whether BNB regulates the level of inflammation through the NF-κB pathway, Western blot analysis demonstrated that the markedly elevated expression levels of TLR4, p-P65/P65, and p-IkB-α/IkB-α in the LPS group were dose-dependently reversed by BNB, as shown in Figure 10A–C, by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway. BNB significantly inhibits the levels of iNOS and COX-2 proteins in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells, which are mediated by the NF-κB pathway, as shown in Figure 11A,B.

4. Discussion

This study identified the compounds in the extract of B. hemsleyana via LC-MS. A total of 47 compounds have been identified, including alkaloids, flavonoids, triterpenoids, coumarins, and lignans. Meanwhile, from the perspective of antibacterial activity in vitro, the antibacterial effects were evaluated with five pathogenic microorganisms (C. albicans, E. coli, P. gingivalis, S. aureus, and S. mutans) and their approximate MICs and MBCs were preliminarily determined. Notably, the extract exhibited significant inhibitory activity against P. gingivalis (1.25 ± 0.05 mg/mL). Therefore, components of different polarities were used to test their inhibitory activity against P. gingivalis, and it was found that the BNB exerted remarkable inhibitory effects on P. gingivalis. SEM observations revealed that BNB achieves antibacterial effects by disrupting the biofilm of P. gingivalis after 6 h. The experiment on intracellular protein leakage of P. gingivalis showed that 1 mg/mL BNB damages the bacterial cell membrane, and its effect is comparable to that of Metronidazole. This suggests that the BNB has inhibitory and therapeutic potential against bacterial infections associated with periodontitis, which warrants further investigation [23].
Based on the compounds identified in the crude B. hemsleyana extract, network pharmacology was used to predict the mechanistic pathways through which B. hemsleyana extract has antibacterial effects on the human body. Key targets worthy of attention, such as BCL2, BIRC5, CDK9, IL1B, MCL1, and CASPs (caspase family), were identified. This indicates that B. hemsleyana extract coordinates host microbial homeostasis and inflammation by regulating cytokines and cell apoptosis, thereby exerting antibacterial and antimicrobial activities [24]. In the prediction of the anti-Legionellosis pathway, studies have shown that this type of bacteria can act on the host cell’s membrane to prevent macrophage phagocytosis, block host cell autophagy, and interfere with cell apoptosis, thereby enabling their reproduction and infection. In contrast, the GO analysis indicated that the targets of B. hemsleyana extract are associated with cellular substructures such as the organelle outer membrane, plasma membrane, and tubulin. This suggests that it may prevent Legionella from interfering with the cell membrane, which supports the prediction of its antibacterial activity [25]. Pathogenic E. coli infection is consistent with the favorable antibacterial activity of the crude extract against the E. coli observed in the antibacterial assay. Meanwhile, studies have shown that berberine, when combined with antibacterial agents, can enhance the in vitro antibacterial efficacy of drugs against animal-derived E. coli [26]. Molecular docking experiments were performed to visualize and score the binding affinity between key targets and active compounds [27]. The results revealed that Calenduloside E with CASP3, Citric Acid with CASP1, Acanthoside B with CDK9, and Dihydroberberine with RELA exhibited relatively low binding energies, indicating stable intermolecular interactions.
When bacterial invasion activates intracellular NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathways, CDK9 is rapidly recruited to the promoter regions of immune genes, initiating the transcription of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β genes and guiding immune cell migration to the infection site [28]. Bacterial infections are often accompanied by tissue inflammation, and the NF-κB signaling pathway is the most typical inflammatory pathway [29]. By studying the inhibitory effect of BNB on LPS-induced inflammation in RAW264.7 cells, we found that BNB can suppress the expression of TLR4 membrane receptors and inhibit the phosphorylation of P65 and IkB-α proteins, thereby restraining the overactivation of the NF-κB pathway. This leads to a reduction in the expression of the inflammatory factors TNF-α, NO, IL-1β, IL-6, iNOS, and COX-2, ultimately alleviating inflammation.
In conclusion, the study predicted the network relationships among the active components and pathways of B. hemsleyana bark via network pharmacology and antibacterial experiments in vitro. Future studies will focus on its key targets and signaling pathways to further conduct in vivo and clinical research and systematically investigate the molecular mechanism underlying its antibacterial activity through in-depth molecular experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants15010115/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Y.; Methodology, G.Y.; Software, G.Y. and X.L.; Validation, G.Y.; Formal analysis, M.G.; Investigation, G.Y. and H.D.; Resources, D.Z.; Data curation, T.S.; Writing—original draft, G.Y., M.G. and X.L.; Visualization, H.G.; Supervision, H.G. and L.L.; Project administration, R.Y. and L.L.; Funding acquisition, R.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Central Guided Local Science and Technology Development Project (Free exploration Basic Research (ZYYD202301YD0016C), Science and Technology Program of Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region (LSKJ202321) and the “High-Level Talent Cultivation Program, Xizang University” (2025-GSP-S167).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, X.; You, L.; Khan, R.A.A.; Yu, Y. Phenolic Contents, Organic Acids, and the Antioxidant and Bio Activity of Wild Medicinal Berberis Plants- as Sustainable Sources of Functional Food. Molecules 2022, 27, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yang, T.; Qin, N.; Liu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, W.; Fan, D. Berberine regulates intestinal microbiome and metabolism homeostasis to treat ulcerative colitis. Life Sci. 2024, 338, 122385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shakeri, F.; Kiani, S.; Rahimi, G.; Boskabady, M.H. Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory effects of Berberis vulgaris and its constituent berberine, experimental and clinical, a review. Phytother. Res. 2024, 38, 1882–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aas, J.A.; Paster, B.J.; Stokes, L.N.; Olsen, I.; Dewhirst, F.E. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5721–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cassat, J.E.; Thomsen, I. Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 34, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Reyes, L. Porphyromonas gingivalis. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 376–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qiu, L.; Chirman, D.; Clark, J.R.; Xing, Y.; Hernandez Santos, H.; Vaughan, E.E.; Maresso, A.W. Vaccines against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC): Progress and challenges. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2359691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kashem, S.W.; Kaplan, D.H. Skin Immunity to Candida albicans. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thayumanavan, T.; Harish, B.S.; Subashkumar, R.; Shanmugapriya, K.; Karthik, V. Streptococcus mutans biofilms in the establishment of dental caries: A review. 3 Biotech 2025, 15, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, L.; Li, R.; Chen, X.; Xue, Y.; Liu, D. Neougonin A Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Responses via Downregulation of the NF-kB Signaling Pathway in RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Inflammation 2016, 39, 1939–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, C.; Zhang, P.; Yang, C.; Gao, X.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y.; Liu, M. Extraction Process, Component Analysis, and In Vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Total Flavonoid Extracts from Abutilon theophrasti Medic. Leaves. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 3508506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kang, M.H.; Kim, S.H.; Park, J.H.; Yeom, S.H.; Park, J.E.; Kim, J.W. Effect of Ixeris dentata extract on anti-inflammatory by inhibition of Nf-kb and cytokine levels. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2025, 34, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Venanzoni, R.; Flores, G.A.; Angelini, P. Exploring Plant Extracts as a Novel Frontier in Antimicrobial Innovation: Plant Extracts and Antimicrobials. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fantatto, R.R.; Chagas, A.C.d.S.; Gainza, Y.A.; Politi, F.A.S.; Mesquita, L.M.d.S.; Vilegas, W.; Bizzo, H.R.; Montanari Junior, Í.; Pietro, R.C.L.R. Acaricidal and anthelmintic action of ethanolic extract and essential oil of Achyrocline satureioides. Exp. Parasitol. 2022, 236–237, 108252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gianecini, R.; Oviedo, C.; Irazu, L.; Rodríguez, M.; Galarza, P. Comparison of disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for gentamicin susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 91, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, H.; Liu, C.; Li, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Ma, J.; Li, L.; Chen, M.; Cheng, M.; et al. In Vitro Antibacterial Experiment of Fuzheng Jiedu Huayu Decoction Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 10, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kun, Y.; Huan, W.; Jie, G.; Yufang, L.I.; Qiong, Z.; Yanan, S.; Aixiang, H. Mechanism by Which Antimicrobial Peptide BCp12 Acts on the Cell Wall and Membrane of Escherichia coli Cells and Induces DNA Damage. Food Sci. 2021, 42, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Y.-N.; Li, H.-L.; Huang, J.-J.; Li, M.-J.; Liao, T.; Zu, X.-Y. Antimicrobial activities and mechanism of sturgeon spermary protein extracts against Escherichia coli. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1021338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, P.; Chang, K.; Yuan, S.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, K.; Jiang, Y.; Tu, P.; Lu, Y.; Guo, X. Exploring the Mechanism of Hepatotoxicity Induced by Dictamnus dasycarpus Based on Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking and Experimental Pharmacology. Molecules 2023, 28, 5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Gan, J.; Chen, S.; Xiao, Z.-X.; Cao, Y. CB-Dock2: Improved protein–ligand blind docking by integrating cavity detection, docking and homologous template fitting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W159–W164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kar, F.; Hacioglu, C.; Kacar, S.; Sahinturk, V.; Kanbak, G. Betaine suppresses cell proliferation by increasing oxidative stress–mediated apoptosis and inflammation in DU-145 human prostate cancer cell line. Cell Stress Chaperones 2019, 24, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, M.; Kim, H. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Apostichopus japonicus Extract in Porphyromonas gingivalis-Stimulated RAW 264.7 Cells. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 13405–13417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Potempa, J. Porphyromonas Gingivalis Infections Underline Association of Periodontitis with Systemic Diseases. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 78.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xin, Y.; Xu, Z.; Guan, J.; Zheng, J.; Hua, C.; Jiang, Q.; Li, Q.; Fan, J. Network pharmacology analysis and biological validation of molecular targets regulated by glaucocalyxin a in periodontitis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2025, 781, 152539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mondino, S.; Schmidt, S.; Rolando, M.; Escoll, P.; Gomez-Valero, L.; Buchrieser, C. Legionnaires’ Disease: State of the Art Knowledge of Pathogenesis Mechanisms of Legionella. Annu. Rev. Pathol.-Mech. Dis. 2020, 15, 439–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. More, N.V.; Kharat, K.R.; Kharat, A.S. Berberine from Argemone mexicana L exhibits a broadspectrum antibacterial activity. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2017, 64, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Laurindo, L.F.; Santos, A.R.D.O.D.; Carvalho, A.C.A.D.; Bechara, M.D.; Guiguer, E.L.; Goulart, R.D.A.; Vargas Sinatora, R.; Araújo, A.C.; Barbalho, S.M. Phytochemicals and Regulation of NF-kB in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Overview of In Vitro and In Vivo Effects. Metabolites 2023, 13, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Law, M.E.; Corsino, P.E.; Narayan, S.; Law, B.K. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors as Anticancer Therapeutics. Mol. Pharmacol. 2015, 88, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L. Effect of Bifidobacterium on osteoclasts: TNF-α/NF-κB inflammatory signal pathway-mediated mechanism. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1109296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Determination of the antibacterial and bactericidal effects of extract of B. hemsleyana. The MIC and MBC of the (A) C. albicans, (B) E. coli, (C) P. gingivalis, (D) S. aureus, (E) S. mutans by extract of B. hemsleyana.
Figure 1. Determination of the antibacterial and bactericidal effects of extract of B. hemsleyana. The MIC and MBC of the (A) C. albicans, (B) E. coli, (C) P. gingivalis, (D) S. aureus, (E) S. mutans by extract of B. hemsleyana.
Plants 15 00115 g001
Figure 2. The influence of B. hemsleyana (A) petroleum ether (BPE), (B) ethyl acetate (BEA), (C) n-butanol (BNB), (D) water (BW) components on the antibacterial zone.
Figure 2. The influence of B. hemsleyana (A) petroleum ether (BPE), (B) ethyl acetate (BEA), (C) n-butanol (BNB), (D) water (BW) components on the antibacterial zone.
Plants 15 00115 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope results of BNB treatment of P. gingivalis for 6 h. (A,B) Control group (C,D) and BNB (0.25 mg/mL), 20,000× and 50,000×.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope results of BNB treatment of P. gingivalis for 6 h. (A,B) Control group (C,D) and BNB (0.25 mg/mL), 20,000× and 50,000×.
Plants 15 00115 g003
Figure 4. Intracellular protein leakage of P. gingivalis. (MDZ: Metronidazole 1 mg/mL, MIC: BNB 0.25 mg/mL). Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ** p < 0.01 vs. control group at 2 h; ## p < 0.01 vs. control group at 4 h.
Figure 4. Intracellular protein leakage of P. gingivalis. (MDZ: Metronidazole 1 mg/mL, MIC: BNB 0.25 mg/mL). Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ** p < 0.01 vs. control group at 2 h; ## p < 0.01 vs. control group at 4 h.
Plants 15 00115 g004
Figure 5. PPI network map of B. hemsleyana bark targets.
Figure 5. PPI network map of B. hemsleyana bark targets.
Plants 15 00115 g005
Figure 6. Network pharmacology analysis of the active effects of B. hemsleyana extract. (A) Intersection of drug targets and disease targets. (B) Core target PPI network diagram. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. (D) GO functional enrichment analysis.
Figure 6. Network pharmacology analysis of the active effects of B. hemsleyana extract. (A) Intersection of drug targets and disease targets. (B) Core target PPI network diagram. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. (D) GO functional enrichment analysis.
Plants 15 00115 g006
Figure 7. Heatmap of binding energies between key targets and active compounds.
Figure 7. Heatmap of binding energies between key targets and active compounds.
Plants 15 00115 g007
Figure 8. Visualization analysis of integration. (A) Calenduloside E—CASP3, (B) Limonin—CASP1, (C) Acanthoside B—CDK9, (D) Dihydroberberine—RELA.
Figure 8. Visualization analysis of integration. (A) Calenduloside E—CASP3, (B) Limonin—CASP1, (C) Acanthoside B—CDK9, (D) Dihydroberberine—RELA.
Plants 15 00115 g008
Figure 9. Effect of BNB on inflammation in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. (A) Effect of BNB on the viability of RAW264.7 cells. The levels of (B) NO, (C) IL-1β, (D) IL-6, (E) TNF-α content. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.
Figure 9. Effect of BNB on inflammation in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. (A) Effect of BNB on the viability of RAW264.7 cells. The levels of (B) NO, (C) IL-1β, (D) IL-6, (E) TNF-α content. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.
Plants 15 00115 g009
Figure 10. BNB inhibits the NF-κB pathway proteins in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. The expressions of (A) TLR4, (B) P-P65/P65, (C) P-IkB-α/IkB-α were detected by Western blot, (D) The proteins expression figure of NF-κB pathway was analyzed by Western blot. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group. ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.
Figure 10. BNB inhibits the NF-κB pathway proteins in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. The expressions of (A) TLR4, (B) P-P65/P65, (C) P-IkB-α/IkB-α were detected by Western blot, (D) The proteins expression figure of NF-κB pathway was analyzed by Western blot. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group. ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.
Plants 15 00115 g010
Figure 11. BNB inhibits the expression of COX-2 and iNOS. The expressions of (A) iNOS and (B) COX-2 were detected by Western blot, (C) The proteins expression figure of iNOS and COX-2 were analyzed by Western blot. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.
Figure 11. BNB inhibits the expression of COX-2 and iNOS. The expressions of (A) iNOS and (B) COX-2 were detected by Western blot, (C) The proteins expression figure of iNOS and COX-2 were analyzed by Western blot. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.
Plants 15 00115 g011
Table 1. Databases and software.
Table 1. Databases and software.
DatabaseWeb Link
TCMSP (Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform)https://www.tcmsp-e.com/
ETCM (The Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine)http://www.tcmip.cn/ETCM/
Swiss Target Predictionhttps://swisstargetprediction.ch/
UniProthttps://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb
Gene Cardshttps://www.genecards.org/
STRINGhttps://cn.string-db.org/
Metascapehttps://metascape.org/
PubChemhttps://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Venny 2.1.0https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html
Wei Sheng Xin Platformhttp://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/
CB-DOCK2https://cadd.labshare.cn/cb-dock2/php/index.php
MSDIAL version 4.6 softwarehttp://prime.psc.riken.jp/
Cytoscape 3.10.1 softwarehttps://cytoscape.org/
PyMOL 2.5.0 softwarehttps://pymol.org/
ImageJ softwarehttps://imagej.net/ij/
GraphPad Pism9.5 softwarehttps://www.graphpad.com/
Table 2. LC-MS analysis for the identification of compounds in B. hemsleyana bark.
Table 2. LC-MS analysis for the identification of compounds in B. hemsleyana bark.
No.Compound NameCASm/zppmIon ModeClass
1Dihydroberberine120834-89-1338.13782.6POSTyrosine alkaloids
2(R)-Fangchinoline33889-68-8609.71383.4POSTyrosine alkaloids
3Berbamine478-61-5609.29383.4POSTyrosine alkaloids
4Oxymatrine16837-52-8265.194.2POSLysine alkaloids
5(+)-Coclaurine2196-60-3286.14293.2POSTyrosine alkaloids
65-Methoxydimethyltryptamine1019-45-0219.14853.3POSTryptophan alkaloids
74-Guanidinobutyric acid463-00-3146.09261POSSmall peptides
8D(+)-Pipecolinic acid1723-00-8130.08583.6POSSmall peptides
9Fraxinol486-28-2223.05952.9POSCoumarins
10Matrine519-02-8249.19514.3POSLysine alkaloids
11Allomatrine641-39-4249.19514.3POSLysine alkaloids
12N-Formylcytisine53007-06-0219.11232.6POSLysine alkaloids
13Canadine522-97-4340.15313.7POSTyrosine alkaloids
14Betaine107-43-7118.08593.6POSSmall peptides
15Tetrandrine518-34-3623.30884.4POSTyrosine alkaloids
16Cycleanine518-94-5623.30884.4POSTyrosine alkaloids
17(±)-Stylopine138791-29-4324.12232.4POSTyrosine alkaloids
186-Hydroxycoumarin6093-68-1161.02421.4NEGCoumarins
194-Hydroxycoumarin 1076-38-6161.02421.4NEGCoumarins
20trans-Ferulic acid 537-98-4193.05031.5NEGPhenylpropanoids (C6-C3)
21Isoferulic acid 25522-33-2193.05031.5NEGPhenylpropanoids (C6-C3)
22Esculetin 305-01-1177.0191.6NEGCoumarins
23Daphnetin 486-35-1177.0191.6NEGCoumarins
24Acanthoside B7374-79-0579.20721.8NEGLignans
25Eleutheroside E 573-44-4741.26021.3NEGLignans
26Syringaresinol diglucoside66791-77-3741.26021.3NEGLignans
27Acanthoside D96038-87-8741.26021.3NEGLignans
28Liriodendrin573-44-4741.26021.3NEGLignans
29Trehalose99-20-7341.10812.3NEGSaccharides
30Quercetin117-39-5303.04922.4POSFlavonoids
31Rutin153-18-4609.14590.3NEGFlavonoids
32Luteolin491-70-3285.04011.2NEGFlavonoids
33Medicarpin33983-40-3271.09582.7POSIsoflavonoids
34Ethylgallate831-61-8197.04521.6NEGPhenolic acids (C6-C1)
35Cytisine485-35-8191.11742.7POSNicotinic acid alkaloids
36(+)-Isocorynoline475-67-2340.15462.3NEGTyrosine alkaloids
37Isomagnolone155709-41-4281.11772NEGLignans
38(S)-Scoulerine6451-73-6328.15371.9POSTyrosine alkaloids
39Naringin10236-47-2581.18443.6POSFlavonoids
40Isoformononetin486-63-5269.08041.8POSIsoflavonoids
41Hesperetin 7-O-neohesperidoside13241-33-3609.18112.2NEGFlavonoids
42Ursolic acid77-52-1455.35261NEGTriterpenoids
43Tarasaponin VI59252-95-8763.42621.5NEGTriterpenoids
44Limonin1180-71-8471.20061.7POSTriterpenoids
45Medicagenic acid599-07-5501.32131.7NEGTriterpenoids
46Calenduloside E26020-14-4631.38460.9NEGTriterpenoids
47Cucurbitacin E18444-66-1555.29394.4NEGTriterpenoids
Table 3. MIC and MBC of B. hemsleyana extract against five types of bacteria.
Table 3. MIC and MBC of B. hemsleyana extract against five types of bacteria.
StrainMIC (mg/mL)MBC (mg/mL)
C. albicans6.25 ± 0.0512.00 ± 0.05
E. coli25.00 ± 0.0550.00 ± 0.05
P. gingivalis1.25 ± 0.055.00 ± 0.05
S. aureus2.50 ± 0.055.00 ± 0.05
S. mutans6.25 ± 0.0525.00 ± 0.05
Table 4. Inhibitory agar plate inhibition zone diameter table.
Table 4. Inhibitory agar plate inhibition zone diameter table.
Extraction SolventP. gingivalis Inhibition Zone (mm)
Petroleum Ether 16.1 ± 0.30
Ethyl Acetate 22.07 ± 0.35
n-Butanol 36.2 ± 0.30
Water 26.97 ± 0.21
Table 5. MIC and MBC concentrations of various extracts of B. hemsleyana bark against P. gingivalis.
Table 5. MIC and MBC concentrations of various extracts of B. hemsleyana bark against P. gingivalis.
Extraction SolventMIC (mg/mL)MBC (mg/mL)
Petroleum Ether2.00 ± 0.018.00 ± 0.01
Ethyl Acetate2.00 ± 0.014.00 ± 0.01
n-Butanol0.25 ± 0.010.50 ± 0.01
Water1.00 ± 0.012.00 ± 0.01
Table 6. Core antibacterial target of B. hemsleyana extract.
Table 6. Core antibacterial target of B. hemsleyana extract.
GeneCorresponding Representative Active Components
CASP7Luteolin
CASP8Quercetin
CASP9Quercetin
CASP1Citric Acid
CASP3Citric Acid, Calenduloside E
BIRC5Palmatine, Quercetin, Luteolin
STAT3Calenduloside E, Magnoflorine
IL1BQuercetin
STAT1Quercetin
CDK9Citric Acid, Dihydroberberine
RELABetaine, Matrine, Quercetin
BCL2Aesculetin
MCL1Luteolin, Acanthopanaxoside B, Liriodendrin
BCL2L1Calenduloside E, Tarasaponin VI
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, G.; Gui, M.; Dong, H.; Zhuoma, D.; Li, X.; Shen, T.; Guo, H.; Yuan, R.; Li, L. Integrating Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation: Mechanistic Study of the Anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Berberis hemsleyana Ahrendt Extract. Plants 2026, 15, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010115

AMA Style

Yang G, Gui M, Dong H, Zhuoma D, Li X, Shen T, Guo H, Yuan R, Li L. Integrating Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation: Mechanistic Study of the Anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Berberis hemsleyana Ahrendt Extract. Plants. 2026; 15(1):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Guibin, Mingan Gui, Hai Dong, Dongzhi Zhuoma, Xuehuan Li, Tai Shen, Hao Guo, Ruiying Yuan, and Le Li. 2026. "Integrating Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation: Mechanistic Study of the Anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Berberis hemsleyana Ahrendt Extract" Plants 15, no. 1: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010115

APA Style

Yang, G., Gui, M., Dong, H., Zhuoma, D., Li, X., Shen, T., Guo, H., Yuan, R., & Li, L. (2026). Integrating Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation: Mechanistic Study of the Anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Berberis hemsleyana Ahrendt Extract. Plants, 15(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop