Next Article in Journal
Actinidia arguta: Biological and Health Promoting Properties—Analysis of Bioactive Components
Previous Article in Journal
The Central-Periphery Hypothesis Revisited: Implications for Long-Term Genetic Conservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Mineral Fertilization on Vegetation of HNV Pastures in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania)

1
Department of Grasslands and Forage Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăstur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Technical and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăstur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Research and Development Institute for Montanology, 557085 Cristian, Romania
4
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăştur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(23), 3564; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233564
Submission received: 22 October 2025 / Revised: 14 November 2025 / Accepted: 18 November 2025 / Published: 21 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Ecology)

Abstract

High-Nature-Value (HNV) grasslands in the Apuseni Mountains represent traditional semi-natural ecosystems with high biodiversity and major ecological value, but are constantly exposed to pressures generated by both agricultural intensification and abandonment. This study asses the effects of long-term mineral fertilization on floristic composition and grassland diversity within a permanent experiment initiated in 2001 in Gârda de Sus (Romania). Four variants of mineral fertilization were tested: control (N0), low-input (N50P25K25), medium-input (N100P50K50) and high-input (N150P75K75). Floristic analyses were performed using the modified Braun-Blanquet method, and the data were interpreted using multivariate analyses and diversity indices. The results revealed a clear trophic gradient. Both the control and low-input variants maintained high diversity and the stability of communities dominated by Festuca rubra and its associated oligotrophic species. In contrast, medium and high fertilization produced a pronounced reduction in community components, with the dominance of nitrophilous species, especially Agrostis capillaris, a species which is consumed by animals. Multivariate analyses confirmed that the dominant effect on plant communities was the fertilization level, outweighing the interannual climatic variations. Low fertilization maintained biodiversity with minimal changes after 17 years, while higher inputs led to significant species losses and reduced stability of community. The results provide a scientific benchmark for creating specific sustainable management scenarios and highlight the need for accepted organic alternatives. This study is one of the few long-term experiments in the Carpathians that documents the impact of fertilization on HNV grasslands and provides essential benchmarks for adapting management strategies in the context of the Common Agricultural Policy.

1. Introduction

High-Nature-Value (HNV) grasslands are an essential element of the European rural landscape, recognized for their high biodiversity, their role in maintaining ecological balance and the cultural and economic value they generate [1,2,3]. In the European Union, HNV grasslands occupy significant areas, especially in mountain and hilly areas, where traditional agricultural practices have favored the conservation of floristic diversity [4,5,6,7]. At the same time, the application of traditional management on the grasslands has created specific landscape elements that give the cultural landscape its own identity [8,9]. In Romania, they are especially widespread in the Carpathians, being considered cores of agriculture with high natural value and being integrated into the Natura 2000 network [10,11].
These ecosystems provide a wide range of services. As provisioning services, they provide high-quality forage for ruminants that is rich in proteins and minerals [12,13,14]; medicinal plants of pharmaceutical interest, such as Arnica montana, emblematic of the Apuseni [15,16]; and resources for beekeeping. At the level of regulatory services, these ecosystems contribute to carbon sequestration, water regime regulation and climate change mitigation [17,18,19]. In the category of supporting services, HNV grasslands maintain soil fertility and nutrient cycling, supporting the resilience of agroecosystems [20,21]. At the same time, this type of HNV ecosystem has a cultural and social role, being appreciated for its landscape value, agro-pastoral traditions and tourism potential [22,23].
However, HNV grassland ecosystems are exposed to multiple and major threats. Agricultural intensification, through excessive fertilization and mechanization, leads to the simplification of the vegetation cover and the reduction in biodiversity [24,25,26]. In contrast, agricultural abandonment favors secondary succession processes, with the establishment of woody species and the reduction in forage value [27,28,29,30]. This process reduces species richness and causes significant changes in the structure of plant communities, including the loss of herbaceous species with high forage value in favor of less valuable ones [31]. In many European regions, the abandonment without any management of interventions favors the invasion of woody species, leading to the loss of open habitats and the degradation of biodiversity [32]. Climate change acts as a multiplier factor, modifying the hydrological and thermal regime and accelerating the transformation of these ecosystems [33,34]. In addition, both socio-economic and land use changes influence the resilience of cultural landscapes, a phenomenon that is visible in the entire area of Carpathians [35,36,37].
In this context, mineral fertilization has a dual and opposite role [38,39]. On the one hand, it supports increased productivity and improves the nutritional value of the feed [40,41,42]. On the other hand, high doses and repeated applications reduce floristic diversity, favor nitrophilous species and compromise ecosystem stability [43]. The studies on the application of mineral fertilizers confirm that the balance between productivity and biodiversity depends on the dosage, frequency of application and the ecological context [44,45]. Additionally, the effects of fertilization are not only manifested on vegetation, but also on the soil microbiome, where significant functional changes occur in the symbiotic status of species [46,47,48].
Long-term experiments provide essential benchmarks for understanding the critical thresholds at which meadow and pasture ecosystems change their structure and functionality [49,50,51]. Especially for those located in mountain areas, where socio-economic and climatic pressures are increasing, such research is indispensable for the substantiation of new and sustainable management strategies [52,53,54]. The integration of modern vegetation analysis methods [55,56,57] and research on alternative management uses, such as mulching [58,59,60], contributes to the development of a complex and interdisciplinary assessment framework and supports the decision-making process regarding the sustainable management of mountain resources.
The present study aims to evaluate the effects of long-term mineral fertilization on HNV meadows in the Apuseni Mountains, analyzing changes in floristic composition, diversity and types of plant communities 17 years since its establishment. Long-term experiments have a high scientific value, as they allow us to explore series of consistent and diverse data, which reflect the evolutions of meadow ecosystems, which are increasingly vulnerable. The main objectives of the study are proposed to analyze in detail species and community changes due to long-term application of fertilizers. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate the changes that occurred in the composition of plant communities, identify and interpret the trends of change associated with each treatment applied as well as to assess the specific responses of species to these treatments.

2. Results

2.1. Cluster Analysis of Vegetation Under the Influence of Mineral Fertlization

To characterize the floristic composition of the meadow during the study period, the surveys carried out in the three experimental years (2015–2017) were analyzed. In the floristic composition of the experimental variants, 43 plant species were identified, belonging to several botanical families characteristic of meadow ecosystems. The synthesized floristic data are presented in the form of average abundance–dominance (ADM) values, calculated for each repetition, for the three years, considering that the complete data set includes 48 individual surveys (16 for 2015, 16 for 2016 and 16 for 2017), resulting in the analysis of a very large volume of information which would make consultation and interpretation difficult. The presentation of mean values (ADM) represents a scientifically relevant approach, providing a clear and comparable picture of the vegetation of the floristic composition in the three experimental years. The table with ADM values is available in the Supplementary Files (Supplementary Table S1). Cluster analysis, based on the Sørensen index (Bray–Curtis) and the UPGMA method, highlighted the separation of the floristic observations into four major groups that correspond to experimental treatments with different levels of mineral fertilization. Cluster 1 (V1—control): dominated by Festuca rubra—Agrostis capillaris, with high diversity and the presence of oligotrophic species characteristic of high-natural-value mountain grassland. Cluster 2 (V2—N50P25K25): characterized by the community of Trisetum flavescens—Agrostis capillaris, indicating a trend of change in community structure towards species with moderate nutrient requirements. Cluster 3 (V3—N100P50K50): dominated by Agrostis capillaris—Trisetum flavescens as a secondary species, which reflects the fertilization pressure on species with high forage value. Cluster 4 (V4—N150P75K75): accentuated simplification of phytocenosis, with the almost exclusive dominance of Agrostis capillaris, a nitrophilic species tolerant to high doses of nitrogen.
When cutting the dendrogram at ~90% remaining information (PC-ORD), two major groups are obtained (Figure 1). Group 1 (clusters 1–2) brings together two types of communities characterized by the Festuca rubra—Agrostis capillaris floristic assemblage, with the emergence of a transitional group towards moderate trophic requirements under low-input fertilization (V2: N50P25K25 described here as Trisetum flavescens—Agrostis capillaris). Group 2 (clusters 3–4) is dominated by Agrostis capillaris and corresponds to treatments with higher intensity: an Agrostis capillaris—Trisetum flavescens assemblage under medium input (V3: N100P50K50) and a simplified Agrostis capillaris community under high input (V4: N150P75K75).

2.2. Spatial Distance in Plant Community Projection Due to Long-Term Fertilization

The application of mineral fertilization caused major changes in the floristic composition of the grassland (Figure 2). The two main axes of ordination together explain 90.2% of the total variation in the floristic composition (Table 1). Axis 1 explains most of the variation (89.6%) and shows a clear separation between recorded communities as shaped by the fertilization level. On the left side is the control variant (V1), characterized by the Festuca rubra—Agrostis capillaris grassland type, with a stable composition in the three years analyzed. In the lower left quadrant, the low-input variant (V2—N50P25K25) is highlighted, and the community with the Trisetum flavescens—Agrostis capillaris subtype reflect a moderate change in the community structure under this reduced fertilization. On the right side of the ordination, the variants with medium- and high-input fertilization are grouped: V3 (N100P50K50), characterized by the subtype Agrostis capillaris—Trisetum flavescens and V4 (N150P75K75), where the type Agrostis capillaris dominates.
Axis 2, which explains only 0.6% of the total variation, contributes in a small proportion to the differentiation of the communities, which confirms that the trophic gradient induced by mineral fertilization (captured on axis 1) is the main factor of changes in floristic composition.
The distance between the control variants from 2015, 2016 and 2017 was determined with MRPP in order to assess the influence of climate and treatments on the recorded coverage. T is the MRPP test statistic which calculates the separation among the groups. The more negative the T values are, the stronger the separation is. The T values were T = −0.063, p < 0.05 for V12015 vs. V12016, and T = −0.342, p < 0.05 for V12015 vs. V12017 (Table 2), which indicates no significant floristic distance. A is the MRPP agreement statistic which calculates the homogeneity within groups. The A values fall between 0 (indicating heterogeneity) and 1 (indicating homogeneity). The A value was A = −0.001 for V12015 vs. V1 2016, which is to be expected since agreement values are commonly below 0.1 in community ecology [16]. The MRPP analysis shows that the variability between years lacks significant changes, which justifies the use of cumulative data in the following analyses. This also highlights that the observed differences are due to the fertilization effect, which is the dominant and statistically significant driver, outweighing any interannual climatic effects within the studied period. Climate has only marginal influences on the vegetal coverage and on the grassland type.
For the interpretation of the results in Figure 3, we used the data accumulated over the three years of observations, which is equivalent to 12 replications for each experimental variant. This approach provides a higher degree of statistical robustness and confidence in the exploration of the identified differences. The PCoA analysis based on the fertilization vectors and their correlation with the ordination axes (Table 3) shows that axis 1 is closely correlated with high input levels (V3 and V4, significant negative correlations), which explains the positioning of these treatments on the right side of the graph. Both treatments are associated with nitrophilous species such as Agrostis capillaris, Rumex acetosa and Taraxacum officinale. In contrast, the control variant (V1) is negatively correlated with Axis 1, but the recorded communities are characterized as oligotrophic and dominated by Festuca rubra, Carlina acaulis and Carex pallescens, typical for stable HNV grasslands.
Axis 2 is positively associated with the low-input variant (V2, p < 0.001), which indicates the intermediate positioning of this treatment between the control and high inputs. The specific V2 community is characterized by the appearance of mesotrophic species, such as Trisetum flavescens and Hypericum maculatum (which marks a moderate transition in the community structure.
Therefore, the treatment vectors highlight a clear trophic gradient: from oligotrophic and diverse communities (V1) to intermediate communities with partially maintained stability (V2) and further to simplified and unstable phytocoenoses dominated by Agrostis capillaris (V3 and V4).
Figure 3. V1—control (N_0); V2—N50P25K25 (N_50); V3—N100P50K50 (N_100); V4—N150P75K75 (N_150); 15, 16, 17 = the three experimental years; R1, R2, R3, R4 = the four replications.
Figure 3. V1—control (N_0); V2—N50P25K25 (N_50); V3—N100P50K50 (N_100); V4—N150P75K75 (N_150); 15, 16, 17 = the three experimental years; R1, R2, R3, R4 = the four replications.
Plants 14 03564 g003
Legend:—Carlacau-Carlina acaulis, Gymncono-Gymnadenia conopsea, Thympule-Thymus pulegioides, Scabcolu-Scabiosa columbaria, Planmedi-Plantago media, Planlanc-Plantago lanceolata, Gentlute-Gentiana lutescens, Polyvulg-Polygala vulgaris, Brizmedi-Briza media, Ceraglom-Cerastium holesteoides, Leucvulg-Leucanthemum vulgare, Poteerec-Potentilla erecta, Festrubr-Festuca rubra, Leonautu-Leontodon autumnalis, Tragprat-Tragopogon pratensis, Cynocris-Cynosurus cristatus, Lotucorn-Lotus corniculatus, Rhinmino-Rhinanthus minor, Trifrepe-Trifolium repens, Trifprat-Trifolium pratense, Ranuacri-Ranunculus acris, Anthodor-Anthoxanthum odoratum, Pimpmajo-Pimpinella major, Colcautu-Colchicum autumnale, Camppatu-Campanula patula, Vicicrac-Vicia cracca, Carepall-Carex pallescens, Luzumult-Luzula multiflora, Hieraura-Hieracium aurantiacum, Violdecl-Viola declinata, Crepbien-Crepis biennis, Ranubulb-Ranunculus bulbosus, Hypemacu-Hypericum maculatum, Centpseu-Centaurea pseudophrygia, Alchvulg-Alchemilla vulgaris, Trisflav-Trisetum flavescens, Rumeacet-Rumex acetosella, Taraoffi-Taraxacum officinale, Stelgram-Stellaria graminea, Achimill-Achillea millefolium, Verocham-Veronica chamaedrys, Agrocapi-Agrostis capillaris and Festprat-Festuca pratensis.
MRPP analysis confirmed the differences highlighted by PCoA, with all comparisons between variants being significant (p < 0.001, Table 4). Negative values of the T statistic (−14.393 to −15.836) indicated a real and consistent separation between treatments. The A coefficient ranged from 0.343 to 0.730, with the largest differences being between the control and the high-input variant (V1 vs. V4, A = 0.730) and between the control and medium input (V1 vs. V3, A = 0.645). In contrast, the lowest value (V3 vs. V4, A = 0.343) suggests that the high-input variants were similar to each other, both being dominated by Agrostis capillaris, which shows that medium and high inputs lead to convergent phytocoenoses, uniformed by nitrophilous species (Table 5).

2.3. Species Reaction to the Gradient of Applied Inputs

The analysis of the correlation between species and the ordination axes shows that the application of mineral fertilizers generates clear differences in the distribution of species in the phytocoenoses (Table 5). Axis 1 separates the communities associated with the control (V1) from those associated with high inputs (V3 and V4). A total of 31 species were negatively correlated with axis 1 and positively correlated with axis 2, which shows that these species are favored by the lack of mineral fertilization and are not advantaged by the high doses of N150P75K75 type (V4). Among them, multiple species stand out: Anthoxanthum odoratum (p < 0.001), Briza media (p < 0.05), Carex pallescens (p < 0.001), Trifolium pratense (p < 0.01), Carlina acaulis (p < 0.01) and Gentianella lutescens (p < 0.01). These species can be considered indicators of the oligotrophic character of the grassland and were particularly associated with the control and low-input variants.
On the other hand, certain species were strongly positively correlated with axis 1, which shows an increase in their participation with the application of mineral fertilization at medium and high doses. Thus, Agrostis capillaris (p < 0.001) is the most favored by intensive fertilization, followed by species Rumex acetosa (p < 0.001), Taraxacum officinale (p < 0.01) and Veronica chamaedrys (with a certain tendency), which are adapted to nitrophilic conditions.
Axis 2 differentiated, in particular, the low-input variant (V2—N50P25K25), which was associated with mesotrophic species. Among these were Trisetum flavescens (p < 0.001), whose participation increased under reduced fertilization, and Hypericum maculatum (p < 0.05). Other species, Hieracium aurantiacum, Luzula multiflora, Ranunculus bulbosus and Alchemilla vulgaris, had negative correlations with axis 2, showing a trend which suggests that they prefer low fertilization doses and maintain themselves better in low-input variants.

2.4. The Influence of Mineral Fertilizer on Plant Diversity

The control variant (V1) presents maximum values for the number of species (42.33), with a Shannon index of 3.00, an equity of 0.802 and a Simpson index set to 0.919, confirming the character of a stable and diverse HNV grassland. Reduced fertilization (V2—low-input) causes a moderate decrease in the number of species (34.00) and the Shannon index (2.70), but maintains values close to the control for equity (0.765) and the Simpson index (0.896). This comparison shows that reduced inputs do not significantly destabilize the community.
In contrast, medium fertilization (V3—medium-input) accentuates the loss of diversity, with the number of species reducing to 22.00 and the Shannon index to 1.81. The equity decreases to 0.586 and the Simpson index to 0.680, which indicates the simplification of the vegetation cover and the establishment of species with higher tolerance to nutrient input. High fertilization (V4—high-input) generates the lowest values for all analyzed indices: 18.00 species (such as plant species Agrostis capillaris, Rumex acetosa, Festuca pratensis, etc.), H′ = 1.31, E = 0.453 and D = 0.496, confirming the dominance of nitrophilic species and the loss of ecosystem stability. The dominant nitrophilic species is Agrostis capillaris. This species is consumed by animals, has medium fooder value, is medium-tolerant to mowing and is medium-tolerant to grazing (Table 6).
The high F test values and statistical significance (p < 0.001 for all indices) demonstrate that the differences between the variants are significant and that long-term mineral fertilization profoundly influences the structure and diversity of grassland communities.

3. Discussion

The results confirm that long-term mineral fertilization profoundly influences the structure and diversity of HNV grasslands, generating a well-defined trophic gradient. Cluster analysis highlights the transition from diverse communities dominated by Festuca rubra—Agrostis capillaris [61] to simplified communities dominated by Agrostis capillaris. Festuca rubra—Agrostis capillaris grasslands are present over large areas within the Apuseni Natural Park [62]. In general, this type of grassland resists reduced fertilization, maintaining their stability [63]. In the low-input variant (V2—N50P25K25), the grassland shows a dominant community between Trisetum flavescens—Agrostis capillaris, suggesting a moderate ecological transition of the community structure towards mesotrophic species with intermediate nutritional requirements [64]. The study by [65] shows that the cumulative effects of fertilization manifest over several decades. In the case of reduced or moderate inputs, plant communities maintain their basic structure in the long term, without rapid losses of dominant and nutrient-tolerant species [66]. In the absence of fertilization, the phytocoenose could return to its initial structure, a phenomenon also reported in other European experiments [67,68,69]. However, over time, even under low inputs, an evolutionary trend towards the Trisetum flavescens—Agrostis capillaris subtype is observed [70,71,72]. In contrast, medium and high fertilization (V3–V4) led to the dominance of Agrostis capillaris, a species known for its plasticity and nitrogen tolerance [73,74,75]. Communities of this type show an obvious simplification in flora and an increase in the proportion of nitrophilic species, confirming the observations of [76,77,78]. Therefore, cluster analysis reveals not only a statistical differentiation between treatments, but also a predictable ecological trend: the diverse and stable Festuca rubra-type communities are gradually replaced by simplified communities dominated by Agrostis capillaris, which raises questions regarding the sustainability of the continuous application of mineral fertilization in mountain HNV grasslands.
Both PCoA and MRPP analyses confirmed the differences between treatments, showing a clear separation of the experimental variants based on the fertilization level, but without significant variations between years. To obtain this general view, it is justified to use cumulative data (12 replications/variant) to provide statistical robustness to the results. The identified gradient is consistent with similar studies conducted in Apuseni [43,79] and with European meta-analyses on nitrogen fertilization [80].
Correlations between species and PCoA axes highlighted a set of indicator species for each fertilization level. The control communities (V1) were characterized by oligotrophic species (Festuca rubra, Anthoxanthum odoratum, Briza media, Carex pallescens, Carlina acaulis), plant species that are representative for HNV grasslands [17,81]. Reduced fertilization (V2) favored the emergence of mesotrophic species (Trisetum flavescens, Hypericum maculatum), indicating a moderate transition [4,82]. Although the correlations were not statistically significant for Hieracium aurantiacum, Luzula multiflora, Ranunculus bulbosus and Alchemilla vulgaris, the literature shows that these species are characteristic for oligotrophic or poorly fertilized mountain grasslands, being frequently mentioned as indicator species in traditionally mowed or low-fertilization systems [83,84]. This confirms the trend observed in our analysis, where these species negatively correlated with axis 2, suggesting an affinity for low inputs. Medium and high inputs led to the dominance of Agrostis capillaris and other nitrophilous species (Rumex acetosa, Taraxacum officinale), in line with the observations of other authors [53,73,85].
The diversity indices—Shannon, Evenness and Simpson—supported the trends observed in plant communities. The control presented the highest values, confirming the diverse and stable character of the oligotrophic communities [14]. Low fertilization (V2—low-input) caused a moderate decrease in diversity, but without drastic simplifications of the community structure, suggesting that this level of management could be compatible with the maintenance of biodiversity in HNV grasslands, as also highlighted by [68]. High inputs significantly reduced diversity and evenness, indicating a loss of ecosystem stability [41,86].
The results highlight a clear succession of plant community types as nutrient input increases. For V1 (control, without fertilization) the results show the presence of diverse communities, dominated by Festuca rubra and oligotrophic species (Carex pallescens, Carlina acaulis, Anthoxanthum odoratum), and stability indices [87,88]. These grasslands represent a classic form of HNV associated with extensive management. The V2 (low-input, N50P25K25) sustain moderately modified phytocoenoses, with the appearance and increase in the share of Trisetum flavescens and other mesotrophic species. Diversity is slightly reduced, but the equity and stability of the community remain high, suggesting an acceptable compromise between agronomic quality, pastoral value and biodiversity conservation [89]. The increase in the fertilization scenario which is associated with V3 (medium-input, N100P50K50) leads to an obvious transition toward simplified communities. These communities are dominated by Agrostis capillaris and accompanied by nitrophilous species such as Rumex acetosa or Taraxacum officinale. Diversity and equity indices decrease significantly, confirming the loss of ecosystem stability. The maximum dose of fertilizer form V4 (high-input, N150P75K75) reorganizes the phytocoenoses to a highly simplified one, dominated almost exclusively by Agrostis capillaris. The low values of all indices show the loss of biodiversity and the establishment of an unstable community, with reduced ecological functionality.
The long-term cumulative effects are an important research topic for grassland stability and diversity, with long-term trial studies showing that low inputs maintain the basic structure of communities for decades [50,65], while medium and high inputs accelerate the transition to simplified and unstable communities. Overall, the research highlights two main types of communities: (i) diverse and resilient communities dominated by Festuca rubra (control and low-input scenarios) and (ii) simplified communities dominated by Agrostis capillaris (medium- and high-input scenarios).
Our results highlight the importance of maintaining extensive management or low fertilization, compatible with biodiversity conservation objectives and the requirements of the Common Agricultural Policy on High-Nature-Value grasslands. At the same time, this study demonstrates the relevance of long-term research for understanding ecological processes and for substantiating strategies for the sustainable use of mountain resources. Although our study highlights the response of phytocoenoses to different levels of fertilization, it should be emphasized that in HNV grasslands included in the Natura 2000 network, the use of mineral fertilizers is prohibited, which limits the direct applicability of the results and emphasizes the need to identify acceptable alternatives. Overall, the results show that HNV mountain grasslands can be maintained as stable only through extensive management or under reduced inputs, while agricultural intensification inevitably leads to biodiversity loss and simplification of plant communities. These conclusions, congruent with European trends, emphasize the relevance of long-term experiments for the substantiation of agricultural policies compatible with conservation objectives.
The results of the experiment show that reduced inputs can be compatible with maintaining the biodiversity and stability of mountain grasslands, offering a compromise between productivity and conservation [90,91]. In HNV grasslands included in the Natura 2000 network, the use of mineral fertilizers is prohibited; therefore, the recommendations should be interpreted as scientific benchmarks and translated into practice by identifying acceptable alternative inputs (composted manure, natural organic amendments, mulching). Sustainable management should privilege reduced fertilization or its substitution with organic sources to maintain biodiversity and reduce the ecological risks associated with intensification [92,93]. Agricultural policies and measures under the CAP should integrate these results to support biodiversity conservation and long-term stability of HNV grasslands [94,95,96,97]. In addition to the prohibition of the use of mineral fertilizers in HNV Natura 2000 grasslands, our results suggest that alternative inputs (composted manure, organic amendments or mulching), can be integrated into accepted agroecological practices, maintaining the biodiversity and stability of phytocenoses and representing viable solutions that can capitalize on the scientific results obtained in this study [98,99].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area

The experiment was conducted in Gârda de Sus, Alba County, Apuseni Mountains (Western Carpathians, Romania; 46°29′26.4″ N 22°48′53.7″ E), on a semi-natural permanent grassland located at an average altitude of 1130 m with a slope of approximately 5%. The soil had the typology of red, weakly skeletal preluvosol, with predominantly southeast exposure, characterized by moderate fertility and low content of humus and nutrients, which determined its limited natural productivity [100]. The multiannual average temperature was 5.1 °C, and the annual precipitation amounted to approx. 1042 mm. Management consisted of annual mowing, carried out at the beginning of July, and the resulting grass was removed from the experimental plots. The analyzed data covered three experimental years (2015–2017) but reflected the cumulative effect of mineral fertilization applied annually since 2001, the year of the initiation of the experiment. Before the initiation of the experiment, in 2001, the meadow was used in a mixed exploitation system. It was mowed once a year, and in the autumn, it was grazed extensively with cattle, with a stocking rate of approximately 0.2–0.4 UVM/ha [49,101,102]. Regarding the management applied prior to the installation of the experiment, the meadow surface was not fertilized, with the nutrient supply coming exclusively from the manure of the animals grazing in an extensive system. Starting with 2001, the meadow maintenance was performed only by mowing, with the removal of the resulting biomass [49].
Regarding the temperature situation recorded at the Ghețari station, in the last 17 years, the following aspects can be observed: the multiannual average was around 5.80 °C, with a maximum value of 7.7 °C recorded in 2012 [49,103] and 2015 (Table 7), respectively, and the minimum value of 3.2 °C recorded in 2005 [49,104]. Table 7 also shows the increasing trend of the average annual temperature, especially in the period 2015–2017 (experimental years). Therefore, the context of climatological changes in the study area brings important effects/changes on the floristic diversity of the oligotrophic meadows in the Apuseni Mountains [43,49].
Regarding the average annual precipitation values recorded at the Ghețari weather station, it was found that the multiannual average (over 17 years) had the value of 1042.1 mm, with the maximum being recorded in 2001 (1553 mm) and the minimum recorded in 2012 (687 mm), which was considered the driest year in our study area. Comparing the 3 experimental years (2015–2017 period) with the multiannual average, it can easily be seen that the decreasing trend in precipitation values is also complemented by the increasing temperature values (Table 8); therefore a continuously changing picture is foreseen from a climatological point of view [43,49,105].
The study area is part of the Natura 2000 network, being included in the ROSCI0002 Apuseni site, which underlines the importance of protecting rare habitats and species in the area. More precisely, the study area is part of the mountain meadow habitat 6520, Natura 2000 Site, in the Apuseni Natural Park, contributing to the understanding of the complexity of the ecosystem and the implementation of effective conservation measures for this habitat [22,81,106]. The mountain meadow habitat 6520 in the Apuseni Natural Park is particularly important due to its floristic diversity and high ecological value. In this area, the traditional use of meadows has been preserved, which has allowed the maintenance of a habitat with an extraordinary flora, where rare species are found, such as Lilium jankae, Allium victoriale, Centaurea kotschyana, Trollius europaeus, Anemone narcissifolia, Centaurea mollis, Delphinium elatum, Dianthus barbatus ssp. Compactus and Hypericum richerii ssp. grisebachii [22,105,107,108].

4.2. Experimental Design

A long-term experiment, established in 2001, was used to collect the data and to analyze the vegetation trends. A completely randomized block design was used, with 4 treatment variants and 4 replications, on a total of 16 adjacent plots, each with an area of 10 m2 (2 × 5 m). The variants were as follows (kg/ha): V1—control variant (unfertilized), V2—N50P25K25 (N 50 kg ha−1, P2O5 25 kg ha−1, K2O 25 kg ha−1), V3—N100P50K50 (N 100 kg ha−1, P2O5 50 kg ha−1, K2O 50 kg ha−1) and V4—N150P75K75 (N 150 kg ha−1, P2O5 75 kg ha−1, K2O 75 kg ha−1). Mineral fertilizers were administered annually, in early spring, before the start of active vegetation. We used granular NPK 15:15:15 and granular ammonium nitrate for N completion. They were applied once a year in each experimental variant. Mowing was carried out at the optimal time (when the grasses were in the phenological flowering phase), and the vegetal material was removed outside the experiment. The entire experimental field was fenced to prevent access by wild or domestic animals.
Regarding the floristic composition of the meadow before the installation of the experiment, a detailed study of the meadow vegetation was carried out in 2001. Within this, all plant species present in the experimental area were identified, as well as their degree of coverage, thus establishing the initial floristic structure (Moment 0), before the delimitation of the plots and the application of the experimental treatments (installed later in 2001). The complete list of identified species, together with the corresponding values of coverage, is available in the Supplementary Materials (Supplementary Table S2).

4.3. Floristic Composition

The floristic composition was assessed using the Braun-Blanquét method, modified for mountain grasslands by [86] (Figure 4, Table 9). A similar approach was also used in recent studies in the Eastern Alps (e.g., case studies in three mountain regions), where the Braun-Blanquet scale was subdivided into finer classes to increase the resolution of the assessments and the accuracy of estimating species cover in alpine grasslands [109]. This modification is justified by the need for a more precise discrimination of cover variations, especially in communities with a complex structure and high diversity, such as HNV mountain grasslands. The cover estimation was carried out in early July, when most grasses were in the flowering phase. This harvesting period ensured relevance for comparisons regarding vegetation structure [110,111]. Floristic studies were carried out in each experimental variant on the entire 10 m2 area, with 4 repetitions each, and this paper presents floristic data over a period of 3 years, which reflects the cumulative effect of mineral fertilization after 17 years of application. Specialized determiners and instruments adapted to them were used to determine plant species. For scientific nomenclature, resources and international databases recognized in botany, such as POWO (Plants of the World Online) and Euro+Med PlantBase, were used. To ensure the accuracy of the data, all experimental variants were fenced, so that other animals could not enter and influence the results of the study. The optimal time for determining the floristic composition in the study area is July, when the grasses are in bloom, which ensures the correctness of the composition of the floristic study, as shown by other studies conducted on semi-natural meadows [110,111].

4.4. Data Analysis

Multivariate analyses were performed with PC-ORD version 7 [112,113] a software widely used in community ecology for ordination, classification and testing differences between plant groups. This software has been applied in numerous recent studies, including for the analysis of plant and animal community structures, demonstrating its robustness and flexibility in handling complex ecological data [114,115].
Cluster analysis was used to group the recorded communities based on their similarity or differences (dissimilarity) to define grassland types [116,117]. The cluster analysis used the Sørensen similarity index (Bray–Curtis) and the UPGMA (Group Average linkage) clustering method, considered a good standard in plant community analysis and applied in numerous recent studies to delimit ecological and phytosociological groups [118,119,120]. The dendrogram cutoff level was set at approximately 90% remaining information, which allowed the obtaining of clusters with ecological and phytosociological relevance.
Ordination analysis was necessary to highlight the trophic gradient and the separation of grassland types according to treatment and was performed with PCoA (Principal Coordinates Analysis) using the Bray–Curtis distance. This method is frequently applied in ecology to compare plant or microbial communities based on composition. The choice of PCoA is justified by the fact that it provides a unique and reproducible solution, allowing direct interpretation of differences or similarities between samples, unlike iterative methods such as NMDS, which can produce variable solutions. Recent studies confirm the applicability of this approach: for example, ref. [121] used PCoA + Bray–Curtis to differentiate soil fauna communities between grazed and ungrazed grasslands, and [122] highlighted changes in the structure of microbial communities induced by fertilization using the same type of analysis. Ref. [123] showed that the type of fertilization and the planting method influence the structure of fungal and bacterial communities, visualized by PCoA based on the Bray–Curtis distance.
For each experimental variant, vectors corresponding to the fertilization levels were drawn (N0-V1-control variant-zero-input; N50-V2-N50P25K25-low-input (applied in each experimental year); N100-V3-N100P50K50-medium-input (applied in each experimental year); N150-V4-N150P75K75-high-input (applied in each experimental year). This classification reflects the reporting to the thresholds established by the Nitrates Directive (170 kg N/ha/year), as well as the ecological response of the vegetation observed in the field. The procedure for classifying the experimental treatments by input categories (“Zero-input”, “Low-input”, “Medium-input”, “High-input”) follows common practices in the experimental ecology literature, where treatments with different fertilization levels (or nutrient inputs) are compared for effects on plant diversity and productivity [122,123,124]. Vectors were normalized and their significance was tested by permutations (n = 999). PC-ORD offers options for ordination based on Bray–Curtis distances, overlays or joint plots and randomization tests, which makes the choice to use vectors corresponding to fertilization levels consistent with good methodological practices [113,125]. The first two ordination axes were retained for interpretation, as they together explained over 90% of the variation in floristic composition.
To test the differences between the groups identified by cluster analysis and by ordination, the MRPP (Multi-Response Permutation Procedure) was applied. This non-parametric method compares the intragroup similarity with that between groups, providing three main indicators: the A coefficient, which expresses the degree of homogeneity within groups (positive values indicate greater consistency than would be expected by chance); the T test, which describes the degree of separation between groups (the more negative the T value, the stronger the separation); and the p value, which evaluates the statistical significance of the differences. The significance threshold was set at α = 0.05, which is the conventional standard in community ecology. The use of MRPP is frequently reported in the recent literature, including in studies validating the separation of plant and animal communities according to environmental factors or experimental treatments [114,115].

4.5. Diversity Index Analysis

For each experimental treatment, α-diversity indices were calculated: specific richness (S), Shannon–Wiener index (H′), species evenness (E) and Simpson index (D). These indices are frequently used in ecological studies of grasslands and are considered robust tools for assessing community diversity and balance [126,127,128,129]. Ref. [130] applied these indices to characterize vegetation diversity based on remote sensing images, and [128] demonstrated significant differences between communities in protected and unprotected areas, confirming the relevance of these methods in ecosystem analysis. The calculation formulas are standardized in community ecology [91] and were applied based on the relative abundance of species. To compare the differences between treatments, one-way ANOVA was used, and the separation of means was performed by the LSD test at a significance threshold of p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

Long-term mineral fertilization profoundly influences the structure and diversity of HNV grasslands, determining a clear trophic gradient: from diverse and stable communities dominated by Festuca rubra to simplified and unstable communities dominated by Agrostis capillaris. The low-input variant (N50P25K25) maintained the biodiversity and stability of the communities, confirming the resilience of the Festuca rubra—Agrostis capillaris grassland type to low inputs. In contrast, medium and high inputs led to the loss of oligotrophic species and the dominance of nitrophilic species. Multivariate analyses confirmed the robustness of this trophic gradient, demonstrating that the differences were determined by the level of fertilization and not by interannual climatic variations. The results emphasize the relevance of long-term experiments for understanding ecological processes and for substantiating sustainable management strategies for mountain HNV grasslands. The paper highlights the unique importance of long-term experiments for the mountain regions of Romania, providing a solid scientific basis for guiding agricultural policies and for maintaining HNV grasslands. These findings support the integration of long-term experiments into the strategies of the Common Agricultural Policy to guide the sustainable management of HNV grasslands in the Carpathians.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14233564/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Floristic composition—average of 2015–2017; Supplementary Table S2. The structure of the type of grassland before the experiment was set up, 2001 (after Pacurar F., PhD thesis 2005).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.G. and I.R.; methodology, I.G.; software, V.S.; validation, I.G., A.G. and A.P.; formal analysis, C.Ș.; writing—original draft preparation, I.G. and I.R.; writing—review and editing, I.G., V.S., C.Ș., A.G. and A.P.; visualization, A.G.; supervision, I.G. and I.R.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The article processing charge was supported by a grant from The Ministry of Education and Research, project number CNFIS-FDI-2025-F-0115.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this article are available upon request from the corresponding author and/or primary author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Peeters, A. Environmental Impacts and Future Challenges of Grasslands and Grassland-Based Livestock Production Systems in Europe. In Grassland: A Global Resource Perspective; Ghosh, P.K., Mahanta, S.K., Singh, J.B., Pathak, P.S., Eds.; Wageningen Academic Pub: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 365–390. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sima, N.; Păcurar, F. Quality of forage obtained from a mountain pasture as influenced by harvesting phenophase and management. Multi-function grasslands: Quality forages, animal products and landscapes. In Proceedings of the 19th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, La Rochelle, France, 27–30 May 2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Varela, E.; Jay, M.; Flinzberger, L.; Mobarak, C.; Plieninger, T. A Review of High Nature Value Farming Systems in Europe: Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, Drivers, Innovations and Future Prospects. People Nat. 2025, 00, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Balázsi, Á.; Pacurar, F.; Mihu-Pintilie, A.; Konold, W. How Do Public Institutions on Nature Conservation and Agriculture Contribute to the Conservation of Species-Rich Hay Meadows? Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2018, 9, 549–564. [Google Scholar]
  5. Reif, A.; Ruşdea, E.; Păcurar, F.; Rotar, I.; Brinkmann, K.; Auch, E.; Goia, A.; Bühler, J. A Traditional Cultural Landscape in Transformation. Mt. Res. Dev. 2008, 28, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Torres-Miralles, M.; Jeanneret, P.; Lamminen, M.; Joly, F.; Dumont, B.; Tuomisto, H.; Herzon, I. High Nature Value Farming Systems in Europe: A Dataset Encompassing the Environmental Impact Assessment of Farms and Extensive Ruminant Food Products. Data Brief 2025, 58, 111164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Veen, P.; Jefferson, R.; De Smidt, J.; Van der Straaten, J. Grasslands in Europe: Of High Nature Value; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. Reif, A.; Michler, B.; Rusdea, E. Feldgraswirtschaft im Apuseni-Gebirge, Rumänien. Tuexenia: Mitteilungen der Floristisch-Soziologischen. Arbeitsgemeinschaft 2005, 25, 141–149. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reif, A.; Auch, E.; Bühler, J.; Brinkmann, K.; Goia, A.I.; Pacurar, F.; Rusdea, E. Landschaft Und Landnutzung Im Apusenigebirge Rumäniens. Carinth. II 2005, 195, 161–201. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cojocariu, L.; Copăcean, L.; Popescu, C. Conservation of grassland habitats biodiversity in the context of sustainable development of mountain area of Romania. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 8877–8894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Păcurar, F.; Rotar, I.; Vidican, R.; Vaida, I. The Ecological and Agronomic Study of Some Grasslands Phytocenoses from the Site Natura 2000 Rosci 0238 Suatu-Cojocna-Crairît. Rom. J. Grassl. Forage Crops 2023, 27, 9–28. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dale, L.; Fernandez, J.A.; Vermeulen, P.; Lecler, B.; Bogdan, A.D.; Pacurar, F.; Rotar, I.; Thewis, A.; Baeten, V. Research on Crude Protein and Digestibility of Arnica montana L. Using Conventional NIR Spectrometry and Hyperspectral Imaging NIR. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 391–396. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rotar, I.; Vaida, I.; Păcurar, F. Species with Indicative Values for the Management of the Mountain Grasslands. Rom. Agric. Res. 2020, 37, 2067–5720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Samuil, C.; Vintu, V.; Sirbu, C.; Saghin, G.; Muntianu, I.; Ciobanu, C. Low Input Management of Agrostis Capillaris+ Festuca Rubra Grasslands in Romania. Grassl. Sci. Eur. 2011, 16, 335–337. [Google Scholar]
  15. Greinwald, A.; Hartmann, M.; Heilmann, J.; Heinrich, M.; Luick, R.; Reif, A. Soil and vegetation drive sesquiterpene lactone content and profile in Arnica montana L. flower heads from apuseni-mountains, Romania. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 62, 813939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kricsfalusy, V.V. Mountain grasslands of high conservation value in the Eastern Carpathians: Syntaxonomy, biodiversity, protection and management. Thaiszia 2013, 23, 67–112. [Google Scholar]
  17. Janišová, M.; Škodová, I.; Magnes, M.; Iuga, A.; Biro, A.-S.; Ivașcu, C.M.; Ďuricová, V.; Buzhdygan, O.Y. Role of Livestock and Traditional Management Practices in Maintaining High Nature Value Grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 2025, 309, 111301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Păcurar, F.; Rotar, I.; Vidican, R.; Stoian, V.; Gärtner, S.M.; Allen, R.B. Impact of Climate on Vegetation Change in a Mountain Grassland-Succession and Fluctuation. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2014, 42, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sângeorzan, D.D.; Păcurar, F.; Reif, A.; Weinacker, H.; Rușdea, E.; Vaida, I.; Rotar, I. Detection and Quantification of Arnica Montana l. Inflorescences in Grassland Ecosystems Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Drone-Based Remote Sensing. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pergola, M.; De Falco, E.; Cerrato, M. Grassland ecosystem services: Their economic evaluation through a systematic review. Land 2024, 13, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Păcurar, F.; Morea, A.; Gârda, N. Productivity and biodiversity evolution of Festuca rubra grasslands during a seven years period. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca Agric. 2008, 65, 1843–5246. [Google Scholar]
  22. Maruşca, T.; Păcurar, F.S.; Taulescu, E.; Vaida, I.; Nicola, N.; Scrob, N.; Dragoș, M.M. Indicative Species for the Agrochemical Properties of Mountain Grasslands Soil from the Apuseni Natural Park (Rosci 0002). Rom. J. Grassl. Forage Crops 2022, 25, 31. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pellaton, R.; Lellei-Kovács, E.; Báldi, A. Cultural Ecosystem Services in European Grasslands: A Systematic Review of Threats. Ambio 2022, 51, 2462–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pardo, I.; Zabalza, S.; Berastegi, A.; Ripoll-Bosch, R.; Astrain, C. Assessment of Determinants of High Nature Value (HNV) Farmland at Plot Scale in Western Pyrenees. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 349, 119516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vaida, I.; Rotar, I.; Pacurar, F. The Cumulative Effect of Manure on a Festuca rubra Grasslands for 15 Years. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca Agric. 2017, 74, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Păcurar, F.; Nagy, M. Study on DM production and floristic composition of a complex forage mixture. Rom. J. Grassl. Forage Crops 2014, 10, 25. [Google Scholar]
  27. Păcurar, F.; Rotar, I.; Pleșa, A.; Balázsi, Á.; Vidican, R. Study of the Floristic Composition of Certain Secondary Grasslands in Different Successional Stages as a Result of Abandonment. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca Agric. 2015, 72, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jelinčić, A.; Perčin, A.; Zgorelec, Ž.; Papković, D. Local-scale changes in plant community composition following succession of oak-hornbeam forest after grassland abandonment. Acta Bot. Croat. 2023, 82, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shipley, J.R.; Frei, E.R.; Bergamini, A.; Boch, S.; Schulz, T.; Ginzler, C.; Barandun, M.; Bebi, P.; Bolliger, J.; Bollmann, K. Agricultural Practices and Biodiversity: Conservation Policies for Semi-Natural Grasslands in Europe. Curr. Biol. 2024, 34, R753–R761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vaida, I.; Rotar, I.; Păcurar, F.; Vidican, R.; Pleşa, A.; Mălinaş, A.; Stoian, V. Impact on the Abandonment of Semi-Natural Grasslands from Apuseni Mountains. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca Agric. 2016, 73, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elliott, T.; Thompson, A.; Klein, A.; Albert, C.; Eisenhauer, N.; Jansen, F.; Schneider, A.; Sommer, M.; Straka, T.; Settele, J.; et al. Abandoning Grassland Management Negatively Influences Plant but Not Bird or Insect Biodiversity in Europe. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2023, 5, e13008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Meyer, M.; Schaub, S.; Bonev, P. Woody Plant Encroachment, Grassland Loss, and Farm Subsidies. J Agric. Econ. 2025, 76, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bellini, E.; Moriondo, M.; Dibari, C.; Leolini, L.; Staglianò, N.; Stendardi, L.; Filippa, G.; Galvagno, M.; Argenti, G. Impacts of Climate Change on European Grassland Phenology: A 20-Year Analysis of MODIS Satellite Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 15, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Straffelini, E.; Luo, J.; Tarolli, P. Climate Change Is Threatening Mountain Grasslands and Their Cultural Ecosystem Services. Catena 2024, 237, 107802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bucała-Hrabia, A. Reflections on Land Use and Land Cover Change under Different Socio-Economic Regimes in the Polish Western Carpathians. Reg. Environ. Change 2024, 24, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vârban, R.; Vârban, D.I.; Mihăiescu, T.; Păcurar, F. Research on the optimisation of Arnica montana L seedling production. Analele Univ. Din Oradea Fasc. Protecția Mediu. 2014, 5, 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zieliński, M.; Łopatka, A.; Koza, P.; Gołębiewska, B. The Carpathian Agriculture in Poland in Relation to Other EU Countries, Ukraine and the Environmental Goals of the EU CAP 2023–2027. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Balfour, N.J.; Harris, C.; Storkey, J.; Ratnieks, F.L. Trade-off between Pollinator-Wildflower Diversity & Grassland Yields. npj Biodivers. 2025, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Piton, G.; Foulquier, A.; Bernard, L.; Bonin, A.; Pommier, T.; Lavorel, S.; Geremia, R.; Clement, J.C. Mineral Fertilization Reduces the Drought Resistance of Soil Multifunctionality in a Mountain Grassland System through Plant-Soil Interactions. Peer Community J. 2025, 5, e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dale, A.; Rotar, I.; Boudry, C.; Păcurar, F.S.; Lecler, B.; Agneessens, R.; Dardenne, P.; Baeten, V. Fertilization Effects on the Chemical Composition and in Vitro Organic Matter Digestibility of Semi-Natural Meadows as Predicted by NIR Spectrometry. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2013, 41, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Culicov, O.A.; Tarcau, D.; Zinicovscaia, I.; Duliu, O.G.; Stavarache, M.; Vintu, V. Fertilizers’ Impact on Grassland in Northeastern Romania. Separations 2024, 11, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mălinas, A.; Rotar, I.; Vidican, R.; Iuga, V.; Păcurar, F.; Mălinas, C.; Moldovan, C. Designing a Sustainable Temporary Grassland System by Monitoring Nitrogen Use Efficiency. Agronomy 2020, 10, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vaida, I.; Păcurar, F.; Rotar, I.; Tomoș, L.; Stoian, V. Changes in Diversity Due to Long-Term Management in a High Natural Value Grassland. Plants 2021, 10, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dullau, S.; Kirmer, A.; Tischew, S.; Holz, F.; Meyer, M.H.; Schmidt, A. Effects of Fertilizer Levels and Drought Conditions on Species Assembly and Biomass Production in the Restoration of a Mesic Temperate Grassland on Ex-Arable Land. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2023, 48, e02730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gaga, I.; Pacurar, F.; Vaida, I.; Plesa, A.; Rotar, I. Responses of Diversity and Productivity to Organo-Mineral Fertilizer Inputs in a High-Natural-Value Grassland, Transylvanian Plain, Romania. Plants 2022, 11, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jetter, K.; Jani, K.; Wilhelm, K.; Stehle, U.; Chamedjeu, R.; Riedel, C.; Wilfert, L.; Schäfer, P.; Sommer, S. Fertilization impacts microbiomes along the grassland trophic chain. ISME Commun. 2025, 5, ycaf162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Li, L.; Nian, L.; Li, L.; Niu, Y.; He, R.; Liu, J. Nitrogen Fertilization Shapes Soil Microbial Diversity and Ecosystem Multifunctionality by Modulating Soil Nutrients. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Han, Y.; Qu, Y.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, X.; Lyu, J.; Su, X. Ecosystems Resilience Assessment of Forest and Grassland Subjected to Ecological Drought. Ecol. Indic. 2025, 173, 113437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Păcurar, F. Cercetări privind dezvoltarea sustenabilă (durabilă) a satului Gheţari, comuna Gârda prin îmbunătăţirea pajiştilor naturale şi a unor culturi agricole. Teză de doctorat-USAMV Cluj-Napoca 2005, 71, 10362. [Google Scholar]
  50. Apahidean, A.S.; Apahidean, M.; Pacurar, F. Experimental results on the possibilities of vegetable growing in the area of western Carpathian Mountains from Romania. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2004, 32, 30. [Google Scholar]
  51. Su, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, F.; Bai, Y. Multiple Global Changes Drive Grassland Productivity and Stability: A Meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 2022, 110, 2850–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cojocariu, L.L.; Copăcean, L.; Ursu, A.; Sărăţeanu, V.; Popescu, C.A.; Horablaga, M.N.; Bordean, D.-M.; Horablaga, A.; Bostan, C. Assessment of the Impact of Population Reduction on Grasslands with a New “Tool”: A Case Study on the “Mountainous Banat” Area of Romania. Land 2024, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. González-Moreno, P.; Schmitt, E.; Moreno-Ortiz, J.; Pinto-Correia, T.; Guiomar, N.; Delgado-Serrano, M.D.M. Assessing the Vulnerability of Mountain Value Chains to Environmental and Social Drivers in Europe: A Land-Use and Stakeholder-Based Approach. Ambio 2025, 54, 1386–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Luick, R.; Schrode, S.; Schnyder, H.; Isselstein, J.; Taube, F. Extensive grasslands beyond the year 2013—Present situation and options for the future. Grassl. Sci. Eur. 2010, 15, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ghione, F.; Hauser, S.; Reidy, B. Floristic diversity, yield and forage quality: Recent snapshots from a long-term alpine grassland fertilisation trial. Wagening. Acad. EGF Symp. Proc. 2025, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Richter, F.J.; Suter, M.; Lüscher, A.; Buchmann, N.; El Benni, N.; Feola Conz, R.; Hartmann, M.; Jan, P.; Klaus, V.H. Effects of Management Practices on the Ecosystem-Service Multifunctionality of Temperate Grasslands. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Świerszcz, S.; Czarniecka-Wiera, M.; Szymura, T.H.; Szymura, M. From Invasive Species Stand to Species-Rich Grassland: Long-Term Changes in Plant Species Composition during Solidago Invaded Site Restoration. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 353, 120216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dalle Fratte, M.; Montagnoli, A.; Anelli, S.; Armiraglio, S.; Beatrice, P.; Ceriani, A.; Lipreri, E.; Miali, A.; Nastasio, P.; Cerabolini, B.E.L. Mulching in Lowland Hay Meadows Drives an Adaptive Convergence of Above-and below-Ground Traits Reducing Plasticity and Improving Biomass: A Possible Tool for Enhancing Phytoremediation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1062911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gaisler, J.; Pavlů, V.; Pavlů, L.; Hejcman, M. Long-term effects of different mulching and cutting regimes on plant species composition of Festuca rubra grassland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 178, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zarzycki, J.; Józefowska, A.; Kopeć, M. Can Mulching or Composting Be Applied to Maintain Semi-Natural Grassland Managed for Biodiversity? J. Nat. Conserv. 2024, 78, 126584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brinkmann, K.; Pacurar, F.; Reif, A. Secondary succession and fluctuations in meadows of the Apuseni Mountains (Transylvania, Romania) under different fertilisation regimes. Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 2009, 7, 41–58. [Google Scholar]
  62. Păcurar, F.; Reif, A.; Rusḑea, E. Conservation of Oligotrophic Grassland of High Nature Value (HNV) through Sustainable Use of Arnica Montana in the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. In Medicinal Agroecology; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  63. Samuil, C.; Vintu, V.; Sirbu, C.; Stavarache, M. Influence of Fertilizers on the Biodiversity of Semi-Natural Grassland in the Eastern Carpathians. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2013, 41, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bellocchi, G.; Chabbi, A. Grassland Management for Sustainable Agroecosystems. Agronomy 2020, 10, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Scotton, M.; Ziliotto, U. Long-Term Patterns of Grassland Vegetation and Species Richness in a Full-Factorial NPK Fertilization Experiment. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 906, 167555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nazare, A.-I.; Stavarache, M.; Samuil, C.; Vîntu, V. The improvement of Nardus stricta L. permanent meadow from the Dorna Depression through mineral and organic fertilization. Sci. Papers Ser. A Agron. 2024, 67, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  67. Pavlů, V.; Gaisler, J.; Pavlů, L.; Hejcman, M.; Ludvíková, V. Effect of Fertiliser Application and Abandonment on Plant Species Composition of Festuca Rubra Grassland. Acta Oecologica 2012, 45, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Heinsoo, K.; Sammul, M.; Kukk, T.; Kull, T.; Melts, I. The Long-Term Recovery of a Moderately Fertilised Semi-Natural Grassland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 289, 106744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lepš, J.; Lisner, A. Resistance and Resilience of Species Composition: Thirty Years of Experimental Mismanagement and Subsequent Restoration in a Species Rich Meadow. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e70923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Onete, M.; Chiriac, L.S.; Nicoară, R.G.; Bodescu, F.P.; Manu, M. Agrostis capillaris L.-A review of the distribution, characteristics, ecological and agronomic aspects, and usage. Sci. Papers Ser. A Agron. 2023, 66, 505–513. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ludvíková, V.; Pavlů, V.V.; Gaisler, J.; Hejcman, M.; Pavlů, L. Long term defoliation by cattle grazing with and without trampling differently affects soil penetration resistance and plant species composition in Agrostis capillaris grassland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 197, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sackl, T.P.; Kaligarič, M.; Ivajnšič, D.; Škornik, S. Plant communities with yellow oat grass (Trisetum flavescens (L.) PB.) in the submontane and montane regions of Slovenia. Hacquetia 2012, 11, 179–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mosquera-Losada, M.R.; Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. Agroforestry Systems: An Option for Mitigation and Adaptation to Overcome Global Climate Change. Future Eur. Grassl. 2014, 19, 148. [Google Scholar]
  74. Broadbent, A.; Stevens, C.J.; Peltzer, D.A.; Ostle, N.J.; Orwin, K.H. Belowground Competition Drives Invasive Plant Impact on Native Species Regardless of Nitrogen Availability. Oecologia 2018, 186, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kozhouharov, Y.; Lingorski, V. Influence of Mineral Fertilization on Some Biological and Productive Indicators of Natural Meadow of Agrostis Capillaris- Festuca Fallax Type in the Rhodope Mountains (Southern Bulgaria). Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2012, 28, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Păcurar, F.S.; Rotar, I.; Vidican, R.; Vaida, I.; Pleşa, A. Ecological and Agronomical Value of Agrostis Capillaris GRASSLANDS. Rom. J. Grassl. Forage Crops 2021, 23, 49. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hopkins, A.; Holz, B. Grassland for agriculture and nature conservation: Production, quality and multi-functionality. Agron. Res. 2006, 4, 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  78. Edwards, P.J.; Ekins, J.R.; Hollis, S. Long-Term Effects of Free-Ranging Cattle and Ponies on the Soil and Vegetation of Reseeded Grasslands in the New Forest, England. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evol. Syst. 2025, 67, 125875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pacurar, F.; Rotar, I.; Bogdan, A.D.; Vidican, R.M.; Dale, L. The Influence of Mineral and Organic Long-Term Fertilization upon the Floristic Composition of Festuca Rubra L.-Agrostis Capillaris L. Grassland in Apuseni Mountains, Romania. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 866–879. [Google Scholar]
  80. Francksen, R.M.; Turnbull, S.; Rhymer, C.M.; Hiron, M.; Bufe, C.; Klaus, V.H.; Newell-Price, P.; Stewart, G.; Whittingham, M.J. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilisation on Plant Species Richness in European Permanent Grasslands: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Marușca, T.; Păcurar, F.S.; Scrob, N.; Vaida, I.; Nicola, N.; Taulescu, E.; Dragoș, M.; Lukács, Z. Contributions to the Assessment of Grasslands Productivity of the Apuseni Natural Park (Rosci 0002). Rom. J. Grassl. Forage Crops 2021, 24, 23. [Google Scholar]
  82. Păcurar, F.; Marușca, T.; Scrob, N.; Vaida, I.; Nicola, N. The Ecological and Agronomic Study of Some Grasslands Phytocenoses from the Site Natura 2000 ROSCI0002 Apuseni. Rom. J. Grassl. Forage Crops 2023, 28, 31–54. [Google Scholar]
  83. Bohner, A. Soil chemical properties as indicators of plant species richness in grassland communities. Grassl. Sci. Eur. 2005, 10, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  84. Păcurar, F. Specii Indicator Pentru Evaluarea şi Elaborarea Managementului Sistemelor de Pajişti cu Înaltă Valoare Naturală-HNV; Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  85. Toth, G.; Rotar, I.; Păcurar, F.; Vidican, R.; Vaida, I.; Pleșa, A. Characterization of Some Grassland from Transilvanian Plateau. RIULS Home 2017, 60, 189–192. Available online: https://repository.iuls.ro/xmlui/handle/20.500.12811/759 (accessed on 15 September 2025).
  86. Păcurar, F.; Rotar, I. Metode de Stud. şi Interpret. A Veg. Pajiştilor; Risoprint: Burlington, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  87. Păcurar, F.; Balázsi, Á.; Rotar, I.; Vaida, I.; Reif, A.; Vidican, R.; Rușdea, E.; Stoian, V.; Sângeorzan, D. Technologies Used for Maintaining Oligotrophic Grasslands and Their Biodiversity in a Mountain Landscape. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 23, 1128–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Michler, B.; Rotar, I.; Pacurar, F.; Stoie, A. Arnica Montana, an Endangered Species and a Traditional Medicinal Plant: The Biodiversity and Productivity of Its Typical Grasslands Habitats. Grassl. Sci. Eur. 2005, 10, 336–339. [Google Scholar]
  89. Gianelle, D.; Guastella, F.; Vescovo, L. Cattle management for biodiversity conservation in an alpine pasture. Integr. Effic. Grassl. Farming Biodivers. 2005, 112. [Google Scholar]
  90. Bohner, A.; Karrer, J.; Walcher, R.; Brandl, D.; Michel, K.; Arnberger, A.; Frank, T.; Zaller, J.G. Ecological Responses of Semi-Natural Grasslands to Abandonment: Case Studies in Three Mountain Regions in the Eastern Alps. Folia Geobot. 2019, 54, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fartyal, A.; Chaturvedi, R.K.; Bargali, S.S.; Bargali, K. The Relationship between Phenological Characteristics and Life Forms within Temperate Semi-Natural Grassland Ecosystems in the Central Himalaya Region of India. Plants 2025, 14, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Andreatta, D.; Bachofen, C.; Dalponte, M.; Klaus, V.H.; Buchmann, N. Extracting Flowering Phenology from Grassland Species Mixtures Using Time-Lapse Cameras. Remote Sens. Environ. 2023, 298, 113835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. McCune, B.; Grace, J.B. Analysis of Ecological Communities; Mjm Software Design: Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  94. McCune, B.; Mefford, M.J. PC-ORD: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 7; MjM Software Design: Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  95. Domínguez-Yescas, R.; Vázquez-García, J.A.; Muñiz-Castro, M.Á.; Hernández-Vera, G.; Salcedo-Pérez, E.; Rodríguez-Pérez, C.; Gallardo-Yobal, S.I. Small-Scale Environmental Drivers of Plant Community Structure and Diversity in Neotropical Montane Cloud Forests Harboring Threatened Magnolia Dealbata in Southern Mexico. Diversity 2020, 12, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Marcin, M.; Raschmanová, N.; Miklisová, D.; Šupinskỳ, J.; Kaňuk, J.; Kováč, L. Karst Dolines Support Highly Diversified Soil Collembola Communities—Possible Refugia in a Warming Climate? Diversity 2022, 14, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Morabito, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Spampinato, G. Diversity and Ecological Assessment of Grasslands Habitat Types: A Case Study in the Calabria Region (Southern Italy). Land 2024, 13, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Terzi, M.; Jasprica, N.; Pesaresi, S. Syntaxonomic Diversity of Rocky Dry Grasslands of the Chrysopogono Grylli-Koelerion Splendentis Along the East Adriatic. Diversity 2024, 16, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hao, M.; Corral-Rivas, J.J.; González-Elizondo, M.S.; Ganeshaiah, K.N.; Nava-Miranda, M.G.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, X.; Von Gadow, K. Assessing Biological Dissimilarities between Five Forest Communities. For. Ecosyst. 2019, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Xu, W.; Dai, W.; Ding, Y.; Song, S.; Liu, Q.; Yang, W. Drivers of Spontaneous Plant Communities in Urban Parks: A Case from Nanjing, China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mei, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jin, T.; Yang, X. Diversity and Community Structure of Rhizosphere Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Songnen Grassland Saline–Alkali-Tolerant Plants: Roles of Environmental Salinity and Plant Species Identity. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Manu, M.; Băncilă, R.I.; Onete, M. Soil Fauna-Indicators of Ungrazed Versus Grazed Grassland Ecosystems in Romania. Diversity 2025, 17, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, G.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Hu, J.; Shi, P.; Wei, G. Fertilization Alters Indicator Species Serving as Bioindicators for Evaluating Agricultural Practices Related to Maize Grain Yield. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fan, S.; Tang, Y.; Yang, H.; Hu, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, G. Effects of Fertilization and Planting Modes on Soil Organic Carbon and Microbial Community Formation of Tree Seedlings. Plants 2024, 13, 2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Caldararu, S.; Rolo, V.; Stocker, B.D.; Gimeno, T.E.; Nair, R. Ideas and Perspectives: Beyond Model Evaluation–Combining Experiments and Models to Advance Terrestrial Ecosystem Science. Biogeosci. Discuss. 2023, 2023, 3637–3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Peck, J.E. Multivariate Analysis for Community Ecologists: Step-by-Step Using PC-ORD; Mjm Software Design: Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  107. Hautier, Y.; Zhang, P.; Loreau, M.; Wilcox, K.R.; Seabloom, E.W.; Borer, E.T.; Byrnes, J.E.; Koerner, S.E.; Komatsu, K.J.; Lefcheck, J.S. General Destabilizing Effects of Eutrophication on Grassland Productivity at Multiple Spatial Scales. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yan, H.; Li, F.; Liu, G. Diminishing Influence of Negative Relationship between Species Richness and Evenness on the Modeling of Grassland α-Diversity Metrics. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1108739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guo, P.; Lu, Q.; Li, S. Productivity and Species Diversity of Plant Communities Are Higher inside than Outside the West Ordos National Nature Reserve, Northern China. Plants 2024, 13, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, W.; Ye, M.; Pan, X.; Li, M.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, X.; He, Q.; Gu, X.; Qian, J.; Lv, Y. Relationships and Changes in Grassland Community Diversity and Biomass in the Pastoral Areas of the Two Rivers under Grazing Disturbance. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sang, Y.; Gu, H.; Meng, Q.; Men, X.; Sheng, J.; Li, N.; Wang, Z. An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Magurran, A.E. Measuring Biological DPeetersiversity; Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  113. Cislaghi, A.; Giupponi, L.; Tamburini, A.; Giorgi, A.; Bischetti, G.B. The effects of mountain grazing abandonment on plant community, forage value and soil properties: Observations and field measurements in an alpine area. Catena 2019, 181, 104086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Weigelt, A.; Weisser, W.W.; Buchmann, N.; Scherer-Lorenzen, M. Biodiversity for multifunctional grasslands: Equal productivity in high-diversity low-input and low-diversity high-input systems. Biogeosciences 2009, 6, 1695–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Samuil, C.; Nazare, A.I.; Sîrbu, C.; Grigoraş, B.; Vîntu, V. The Impact of Fertilizer Gradient on High Nature Value Mountain Grassland. Plants 2025, 14, 3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Poux, X.; Aubert, P.M. Permanent grassland and ruminants are a key component of the agroecological transition in Europe-findings from the’Ten Years for Agroecology’scenario. Grassl. Sci. Eur. 2022, 27, 16–28. [Google Scholar]
  117. Rancane, S.; Karklins, A.; Lazdina, D. Grass dry matter yield and plant nutrient removal following fertilization with wood ash and digestate. Grassl. Heart Circ. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 27, 259. [Google Scholar]
  118. Lomba, A.; McCracken, D.; Herzon, I. High nature value farming systems in Europe. Ecol. Soc. 2023, 28, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Keenleyside, C.; Beaufoy, G.; Tucker, G.; Jones, G. High Nature Value farming throughout EU-27 and its financial support under the CAP. Inst. Eur. Environ. Policy 2014, 10, 91086. [Google Scholar]
  120. Bartolini, F.; Brunori, G. Understanding linkages between common agricultural policy and High Nature Value (HNV) farmland provision: An empirical analysis in Tuscany Region. Agric. Food Econ. 2014, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Peeters, A. Past and Future of European Grasslands. 124. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234001775_Past_and_future_of_European_grasslands_The_challenge_of_the_CAP_towards_2020 (accessed on 1 August 2025).
  122. Persson, T.; Szulc, W.; Rutkowska, B.; Höglind, M.; Hanslin, H.M.; Sæbø, A. Impacts of organic soil amendments on forage grass production under different soil conditions. Agric. Food Sci. 2020, 29, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rotar, I.; Păcurar, F.; Roxana, V.; Sima, N. The influence of organic and organo-mineral fertilization on biodiversity of the Festuca rubra meadows in Apuseni Mountains. Lucr. Ştiinţifice 2005, 55, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  124. Rotar, I.; Păcurar, F.; Vidican, R. The influence of organic fertilisers on the biodiversity of a Festuca rubra meadow. Grassland Productivity. Grassl. Sci. Eur. 2006, 11, 363–366. [Google Scholar]
  125. Vidican, R.; Stoian, V.; Rotar, I.; Păcurar, F. Use of Non-metric Ordination and Group Analysis for the Assessment of Influence Level of Climatic and Technological Factors over Mycorrhizal Parameters. Rom. J. Grasslallds Forage Crops 2013, 8, 67. [Google Scholar]
  126. Huygens, D.; Vidican, R.; Păcurar, F.; Carlier, L.; Mălinaș, A. The influence of different type of management upon the floristic structure of grasslands systems, with special attention on Arnica montana L. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca Agric. 2013, 70, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Marușca, T. Contributions to the evaluation of the productivity of Natura 2000 grassland habitats in the Apuseni Mountains. Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. 2025, 14, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Tzonev, R.; Gussev, C.; Popgeorgiev, G. Scrub, grassland and rocky habitats in Ponor Special Protection Area (Natura 2000), western Bulgaria: Mapping and assessment of conservation status. Acta Zool. Bulg. 2014, 5, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  129. Proorocu, M.; Miclăuş, M.; Pauliuc, S.; Bodan, S.; Popa, A. The Conservation Measures of NATURA 2000 “Someşul Rece” Site Management Plan. Bull. UASVM Ser. Agric. 2016, 73, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Brinkmann, K.; Reif, A. Vegetation, landuse and landscape in the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca Agric. 2007, 62, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Dendrogram of plant community types. Legend: Manag—management; V1—control; V2—N50P25K25; V3—N100P50K50; V4—N150P75K75; 15, 16, 17 = the three experimental years (2015, 2016, 2017); R1, R2, R3, R4 = the four replications. Management codes: 1, 2, 3—V1; 4, 5, 6—V2; 7, 8, 9—V3; 10, 11, 12—V4. First management correspond to year 2015, second management correspond to year 2016 and third management correspond to year 2017.
Figure 1. Dendrogram of plant community types. Legend: Manag—management; V1—control; V2—N50P25K25; V3—N100P50K50; V4—N150P75K75; 15, 16, 17 = the three experimental years (2015, 2016, 2017); R1, R2, R3, R4 = the four replications. Management codes: 1, 2, 3—V1; 4, 5, 6—V2; 7, 8, 9—V3; 10, 11, 12—V4. First management correspond to year 2015, second management correspond to year 2016 and third management correspond to year 2017.
Plants 14 03564 g001
Figure 2. PCoA of grassland types modified by the application of mineral inputs. Legend. Manag—management; V1—control; V2—N50P25K25; V3—N100P50K50; V4—N150P75K75; 2015, 2016, 2017 = the three experimental years; R1, R2, R3, R4 = the four replications; management codes: 1, 2, 3—V1; 4, 5, 6—V2; 7, 8, 9—V3; 10, 11, 12—V4; first management correspond to year 2015, second management correspond to year 2016 and third management correspond to year 2017.
Figure 2. PCoA of grassland types modified by the application of mineral inputs. Legend. Manag—management; V1—control; V2—N50P25K25; V3—N100P50K50; V4—N150P75K75; 2015, 2016, 2017 = the three experimental years; R1, R2, R3, R4 = the four replications; management codes: 1, 2, 3—V1; 4, 5, 6—V2; 7, 8, 9—V3; 10, 11, 12—V4; first management correspond to year 2015, second management correspond to year 2016 and third management correspond to year 2017.
Plants 14 03564 g002
Figure 4. Modified Braun-Blanquét scale for grasslands based on species coverage (after [86]). Legend: 1 to 5 indicate the class of coverage; a, b, c indicate the sub-note of each class.
Figure 4. Modified Braun-Blanquét scale for grasslands based on species coverage (after [86]). Legend: 1 to 5 indicate the class of coverage; a, b, c indicate the sub-note of each class.
Plants 14 03564 g004
Table 1. Importance of axis.
Table 1. Importance of axis.
AxisDegree of Participation (r)Cumulative
10.8960.896
20.0660.962
Note: r—correlation coefficient between ordination distances and original distances in the n-dimensional space.
Table 2. Comparison of the floristic composition changes due to mineral inputs (MRPP).
Table 2. Comparison of the floristic composition changes due to mineral inputs (MRPP).
TreatmentsTAp Value
V1_2015 vs. V1_2016−0.0630.0010.429
V1_2015 vs. V1_2017−0.3420.0100.330
V2_2015 vs. V2_2016−0.5550.0140.262
V2_2015 vs. V2_2017−0.5920.0160.263
V3_2015 vs. V3_2016−0.2040.0090.326
V3_2015 vs. V3_20170.950−0.0380.829
V4_2015 vs. V4_20160.825−0.0580.808
V4_2015 vs. V4_2017−1.2160.0630.115
Note: T—statistic test, A—statistic agreement, V1—control; V2—N50P25K25; V3—N100P50K50; V4—N150P75K75.
Table 3. Correlation of fertilization treatments with PCoA axes.
Table 3. Correlation of fertilization treatments with PCoA axes.
Experimental FactorsAxis 1Axis 2
rSignificancerSignificance
V1 Control0.660 −0.601
V2 50N25P25K0.344*0.771***
V3 100N50P50K−0.372*0.140ns
V4 150N75P75K−0.608***−0.289ns
Note: r—correlation coefficient between ordination distances and original distances in the n-dimensional space. Significance: p < 0.001—***; p < 0.5—*; ns—not significant.
Table 4. Comparison of the floristic composition changes due to mineral inputs (MRPP).
Table 4. Comparison of the floristic composition changes due to mineral inputs (MRPP).
TreatmentsTAp
V1 vs. V2−15.3330.398<0.001
V1 vs. V3−15.7140.645<0.001
V1 vs. V4−15.8360.730<0.001
V2 vs. V3−15.5880.603<0.001
V2 vs. V4−15.8080.718<0.001
V3 vs. V4−14.3930.343<0.001
Note: V1—control; V2—N50P25K25; V3—N100P50K50; V4—N150P75K75. Note: T—statistic test, A—statistic agreement.
Table 5. Correlation of species with the ordination axis.
Table 5. Correlation of species with the ordination axis.
SpeciesAxis 1Axis 2
rr-sqtauSignif.rr-sqtauSignif.
Agrostis capillaris L.0.9830.9660.901***0.1600.0250.076ns
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. s. str.−0.7920.627−0.694***0.0490.0020.010ns
Briza media L.−0.4620.213 −0.545**0.4290.1840.527*
Cynosurus cristatus L.−0.7600.577−0.574***0.0050.0000.082ns
Festuca pratensis Huds. s. l.0.2300.053 0.134ns0.0490.0020.052ns
Festuca rubra L.−0.8860.786−0.764***0.3970.1570.145*
Trisetum flavescens (L.) P. Beauv.−0.1500.023 −0.124ns−0.9530.908−0.811***
Carex pallescens L.−0.9370.877−0.711***−0.0770.0060.041ns
Luzula multiflora (Ehrh.) Lej.−0.9570.915−0.715***−0.1510.023−0.017ns
Lotus corniculatus L.−0.6130.375−0.662***0.0150.000−0.010ns
Trifolium pratense L.−0.5350.287−0.445**01990.0400.265ns
Trifolium repens L.−0.7480.560−0.582***0.0390.0010.154ns
Vicia cracca L. s. str.−0.0360.001−0.059ns−0.0520.003−0.032ns
Achillea millefolium L.0.2000.0400.053ns0.0710.0050.109ns
Alchemilla vulgaris L.−0.3030.092−0.209ns−0.5580.311−0.419ns
Campanula patula L.−0.0880.008−0.246ns−0.0430.002−0.014ns
Carlina acaulis L.−0.5370.288−0.476**0.4720.2230.427**
Centaurea pseudophrygia C. A. Mey.−0.6590.434−0.529***−0.1890.036−0.087ns
Cerastium holosteoides Fr.−0.4390.193−0.379*0.4110.1690.360*
Colchium autumnale L.−0.3350.112−0.349*0.1300.0170.089ns
Crepis biennis L.−0.4010.160−0.446*−0.0780.0060.138ns
Gentianella lutescens (Velen.) Holub−0.5130.264−0.441**0.4920.2420.448**
Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. s. l.−0.6500.423−0.571***0.6060.3670.559***
Hieracium aurantiacum L.−0.4670.218−0.345**−0.1890.036−0.104ns
Hypericum maculatum Crantz s. str.−0.4720.223−0.329**−0.4860.237−0.236**
Leontodon autumnalis L.−0.7120.507−0.579***0.0900.0080.151ns
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam. s. str.−0.6980.487−0.575***0.5640.3180.335**
Pimpinella major (L.) Huds.−0.4160.173−0.383*−0.0250.001−0.042ns
Plantago lanceolata L.−0.6400.409−0.621***0.5320.2830.340**
Plantago media L.−0.6650.442−0.631***0.5470.2990.340**
Polygala vulgaris L. s. l.−0.5280.278−0.588**0.3810.1450.440*
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch.−0.6220.387−0.703***0.3140.0980.024ns
Ranunculus acris L.−0.6040.365−0.557***0.0200.0000.057ns
Ranunculus bulbosus L.−0.4490.201−0.494*−0.2950.087−0.197ns
Rhinanthus minor L.−0.4040.163−0.474*−0.0260.001−0.146ns
Rumex acetosa L.0.4610.2120.366**−0.5040.254−0.497**
Scabiosa columbaria L.−0.5010.251−0.611**0.3980.1580.414*
Stellaria graminea L.0.1830.0340.155ns−0.0320.001−0.022ns
Taraxacum officinale Weber s. l.0.5980.3580.524**−0.1320.017−0.185ns
Thymus pulegioides L. s. l.−0.5180.268−0.578**0.4710.2210.564**
Tragopogon pratensis L. s. l.−0.7540.568−0.556***−0.0080.0000.077ns
Veronica chamaedrys L. s. str.0.2940.0870.192ns−0.0630.004−0.124ns
Viola declinata L.−0.8740.764−0.645***−0.1600.026−0.040ns
Note: r—correlation coefficient; r-sq—determination coefficient. Significance: p < 0.001—***; p < 0.01—**; p < 0.5—*; ns—not significant.
Table 6. The influence of mineral fertilizer on plant diversity.
Table 6. The influence of mineral fertilizer on plant diversity.
VariantSpecies no. (S)Shannon (H′)Evenness (E)Simpson (D)
V1 (Control)42.33 ± 0.49 a3.00 ± 0.08 a0.802 ± 0.025 a0.919 ± 0.016 a
V2 (Low-input)34.00 ± 0.00 b2.70 ± 0.05 b0.765 ± 0.015 a0.896 ± 0.008 a
V3 (Medium-input)22.00 ± 0.00 c1.81 ± 0.14 c0.586 ± 0.046 b0.680 ± 0.048 b
V4 (High-input)18.00 ± 0.00 d1.31 ± 0.20 d0.453 ± 0.070 c0.496 ± 0.078 c
F test24,928.00416.53132.76445.97
p.valp < 0.001p < 0.001p < 0.001p < 0.001
Table 7. The monthly average temperatures recorded at Gheţari weather station (2015–2017).
Table 7. The monthly average temperatures recorded at Gheţari weather station (2015–2017).
YearMonthsAverage
IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXIXII
2015−0.824.73.810.813.516.516.512.77.73.4−0.27.7
2016−5.40.1188.714.81615.310.94.60.4−5.45.7
2017−1.868.36.41014.615.515.310.77.90.6−3.27.5
Average values for the period 2001–2017
2001–2017−4.5−2.70.25.310.514.515.915.411.36.01.4−3.15.8
Table 8. The monthly average precipitations recorded at Gheţari weather station (2015–2017).
Table 8. The monthly average precipitations recorded at Gheţari weather station (2015–2017).
YearMonthsTotal
IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXIXII
201532.614.223.648.669.478.233.89512438.898.449.8706.4
2016120111.479.4108.467165.458.849.45686.61270.21030
201711208611.4116.6953735881009836.2815.2
Average values for the period 2001–2017
2001–201767.255.981.877.2102.4100.3137.398.492.686.686.555.81042.1
Table 9. Modified Braun-Blanquét scale for assessing the abundance–dominance of plant species, based on classes and sub-classes (after [86]).
Table 9. Modified Braun-Blanquét scale for assessing the abundance–dominance of plant species, based on classes and sub-classes (after [86]).
ClassCoverage
Interval (%)
Class Central
Value (%)
Sub-NoteSub-Interval (%)Central-Adjusted Value of Sub-Interval (%)
575–10087.55c92–10096
5b83–9287.5
5a75–8379
450–7562.54c67–7571
4b58–6762.5
4a50–5854
325–5037.53c42–5046
3b33–4237.5
3a25–3329
210–2517.52c20–2522.25
2b15–2017.5
2a10–1512.5
11–1051c6–108
1b4–65
1a1–42.5
+0.1–10.5--0.5
r0.01–0.10.05--0.05
Note: a, b, c indicate the sub-note of each class.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghețe, I.; Rotar, I.; Pleșa, A.; Ghețe, A.; Șerban, C.; Stoian, V. Effect of Mineral Fertilization on Vegetation of HNV Pastures in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Plants 2025, 14, 3564. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233564

AMA Style

Ghețe I, Rotar I, Pleșa A, Ghețe A, Șerban C, Stoian V. Effect of Mineral Fertilization on Vegetation of HNV Pastures in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Plants. 2025; 14(23):3564. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghețe, Ioana, Ioan Rotar, Anca Pleșa, Alexandru Ghețe, Claudiu Șerban, and Vlad Stoian. 2025. "Effect of Mineral Fertilization on Vegetation of HNV Pastures in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania)" Plants 14, no. 23: 3564. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233564

APA Style

Ghețe, I., Rotar, I., Pleșa, A., Ghețe, A., Șerban, C., & Stoian, V. (2025). Effect of Mineral Fertilization on Vegetation of HNV Pastures in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Plants, 14(23), 3564. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop