Next Article in Journal
A Deep Dive into the Botanical and Medicinal Heritage of Taxus
Previous Article in Journal
Floral Closure in Lesser Celandine (Ficaria verna) Protects Anthers from Pollen Flushing and Preserves Pollen Viability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Analysis of the CML Gene Family in Bletilla striata and Regulation of Militarine Synthesis Under Sodium Acetate and Salicylic Acid Treatments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ZmHPAT2 Regulates Maize Growth and Development and Mycorrhizal Symbiosis

Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Resistance and High-Quality Biology of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(10), 1438; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101438
Submission received: 18 March 2025 / Revised: 26 April 2025 / Accepted: 6 May 2025 / Published: 11 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic and Biological Diversity of Plants)

Abstract

:
Hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferase (HPAT), a critical enzyme in plant glycosylation pathways, catalyzes the transfer of arabinose to the hydroxyl group of hydroxyproline residues. This enzyme contains a canonical GT95 glycosyltransferase, a structural hallmark of this carbohydrate-active enzyme family. HPAT mediates arabinosylation of diverse cellular targets, including cell wall extension and small signaling peptides. Emerging evidence has shown that HPAT orthologs regulate plant development and symbiotic interactions through post-translational modification of CLV1/LRR Extracellular (CLE) peptides. Although the molecular functions of HPAT genes have been characterized in model plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Lotus japonicus, their roles remain unexplored in Zea mays L. In this study, we used ZmHPAT2 homozygous mutants to explore the function of the maize HPAT gene. Sequence analysis identified a N-terminal signal peptide targeting the Golgi apparatus and promoter elements responsive to AM fungal colonization. Phenotypic analysis revealed its negative regulatory role: zmhpat2 promotes vegetative growth (increased plant height and accelerated flowering) and enhances AM symbiosis (increased colonization rate). Mechanistic studies demonstrated that ZmHPAT2 possesses dual regulatory functions—the activation of auxin signaling and repression of ZmMYB1-mediated arbuscular degradation pathways. In addition, overexpression of ZmHPAT2 in Lotus japonicus inhibits growth (reduced plant height) and impairs symbiotic interactions. Our findings establish ZmHPAT2 as a critical node to regulate auxin and symbiotic signaling, providing novel insights into plant glycosylation-mediated development. This work not only advances our understanding of maize growth regulation but also identifies potential targets for crop improvement through arabinosylation pathway manipulation.

1. Introduction

Maize is one of the most consumed crops in the world and is the main food crop in China [1]. Maize (Zea mays L.), a thermophilic C4 cereal crop with high photosynthetic efficiency, possesses a functionally sophisticated root system that is crucial for growth, development, and stress responses [2]. Root systems primarily facilitate the acquisition of water and nutrients from the soil [3]. Furthermore, as the primary interface for plant–soil interactions, the root system plays a pivotal role in mediating plant responses to environmental fluctuations, thereby influencing crucial agronomic traits [4]. These traits include drought tolerance [5,6], flood resistance, lodging resistance [7,8], and nutrient utilization efficiency through symbiotic associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere [6]. The symbiotic relationship between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and maize represents a mutualistic association characterized by reciprocal nutrient exchange. AM fungi enhance the host plant’s capacity for water and mineral nutrient acquisition from the soil, while simultaneously improving its stress tolerance. In return, the fungal partner receives fixed carbon compounds from the host plant. Both sides exchange these substances through highly branched arbuscular structures in plant cells [9,10]. In addition, plant height is an important trait and is closely related to the lodging resistance of plants and the yield of some cash crops [11]. Plant height is determined by stem cell division, expansion, and differentiation [12,13]. Plant hormones are important regulators of plant height, such as gibberellin (GA), brassinosteroid (BR), cytokinin (CK), and auxin (IAA) [14,15]. The regulation process of plant height is very complex, and phytohormone-related pathways have a very important impact on plant height [16].
Hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferase (HPAT) is a key enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of arabinosyltransferase to hydroxyproline. It is a small, highly conserved family of plant-specific glycosyltransferases, belonging to the GT95 glycosyltransferase family [17]. This family adds arabinose to a variety of proteins, including cell wall-associated extension proteins and small signal peptides [18]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the hpat1-1/hpat2-1 double mutant has been shown to exhibit various phenotypes such as longer hypocotyls than the wild type, reduced cell wall thickness, early flowering [14,15], and decreased chlorophyll content. In addition, the pollen development ability of the Arabidopsis thaliana double mutant hpat1/hpat3 was lower than of that the wild type [19]. When grown on in vitro pollen germination medium, the pollen tubes of the double mutant hpat1/hpat3 showed many defects, including reduced length of pollen tube, increased frequency of pollen tube rupture, and increased width of pollen tube. The FIN4 gene of the tomato HPAT gene family was expressed in developing pollen, and the fin4 mutant with a missing catalytic domain showed a decreased pollen tube germination rate and impaired pollen hydration. Moreover, legumes have evolved mechanisms to maintain a symbiotic balance between nodule formation, which fulfills their nitrogen requirements, and the energy levels necessary for other biological processes [20]. These mechanisms are known as the autoregulation of neoplasia (AON) pathway. LjPLENTY and MtRDN3 (Medicago truncatula ROOT DETERMINED NODULATION3) all belong to the HPAT gene family and may mediate the arabinosylation of CLV1/LRR Extracellular (CLE) peptides that they modify, playing a crucial role in the AON of their respective species [21,22]. Studies on the PLENTY gene of Lotus japonicus showed that the mutant plenty had an increased number of nodules and shorter roots under both symbiotic and non-symbiotic conditions [19]. These results suggest that HPAT family genes can play a role in plant development and AM symbiosis by modifying the CLE peptides.
In recent years, HPAT has been reported to have functions related to growth, development, and symbiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana, Lotus japonicus, and Solanum lycopersicum [19,21,23]. However, there have been no reports on the functional study of HPAT in maize. Therefore, exploring the functions of the HPAT gene family in maize is of great significance for maize research and the development of germplasm resources.

2. Results

2.1. Bioinformatics Analysis of the ZmHPAT2 Gene

Three HPAT genes in maize were homologous to those in Arabidopsis, rice, and soybean, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA7.0. The results of the evolutionary tree showed that HPAT proteins are a widely existing family in the plant kingdom, including Salvia verticillata, Arabidopsis thaliana, Glycine max, Medicago sativa, etc. This widespread distribution suggests the evolutionary conservation of hydroxyproline arabinosylation pathways in plant evolution. Among them, At2g25260 (AtHPAT2), At2g25265 (AtHPAT1), and At5g13500 (AtHPAT3) are three genes that have been previously characterized as regulators of the growth and development of Arabidopsis thaliana, whereas the mutant Medtr5g089520 (MtRDN1) has been reported to show a highly nodular phenotype [24]. Phylogenetic analysis of the gene family revealed that ZmHPAT2 is closely related to LjPLENTY, PsNOD3, and MtRDN1, all of which have been reported to be related to fungal symbiosis (Figure 1A).
The domains of the HPAT family genes in maize and three genes in A. thaliana were analyzed using the SMART website. It was found that they all contain a domain at the N-terminal (Figure 1B). The HPAT genes of A. thaliana, rice, sorghum, and soybean were subjected to protein sequence comparison with those of maize. The comparison results showed that HPAT family genes contained multiple conserved amino acid residues in different species, indicating that HPAT family genes were highly conserved during species evolution (Figure 1C). Comparative analysis using the DANMAN software(version 6.0) revealed that the protein sequence consistency was 69.64%. The protein sequence of ZmHPAT2 included a transmembrane domain and a highly conserved GT95 catalytic domain, suggesting that ZmHPAT2 encodes a possible functional HPAT protein.

2.2. Subcellular Localization of ZmHPAT2

The HPAT gene family belongs to the GT95 glycosyltransferase family and is involved in post-translational modification of proteins. It has been reported that HPAT genes in other species are localized in the Golgi apparatus [17]. To show the localization of ZmHPAT2, the 35S::ZmHPAT2-GFP fusion vector and maize protoplasts were used to observe subcellular localization (Figure 2A). The constructed fusion vector was transferred into maize protoplasts using a Polyethylene glycol-mediated method. During transfer, the maize Golgi positioning signal plasmid was co-transformed as an indicator. As shown in the figure (Figure 2B), the empty 35S::GFP carrier without gene fusion showed green fluorescence in the nucleus, cell membrane, and cytoplasm, while the 35S::ZmHPAT2-GFP carrier showed a spot-like green fluorescence distribution in the cell, which was highly overlapped with the red fluorescence presented by the Golgi localization signal plasmid. Therefore, we determined that ZmHPAT2 is located in the Golgi apparatus. This is consistent with the function of ZmHAPT2 in post-translational modification of small peptides.

2.3. ZmHPAT2 Positively Regulates Root Development

For subsequent experiments, we identified the homozygous mutant of ZmHPAT2. In the mutant detection, by comparing the sequencing results with the wild type, if the mutation site shows a transition from T base to G base and exhibits a single peak, it indicates a homozygous plant; if the mutation site shows a double peak, it indicates a heterozygous plant.
To determine whether ZmHPAT2 affects maize root development, the homozygous mutant zmhpat2 was germinated with wild type (WT) as a control. After 4 days, the primary root length of the zmhpat2 mutant was significantly shorter than that of the wild type (WT), showing a 60% reduction in root length (Figure 3A). Additionally, a sampling analysis of maize plants grown in the field for 65 days revealed that the root length of the zmhpat2 mutant was still shorter than that of the wild type (Figure 3B). The root length statistical results are consistent with the phenotypes, showing significant differences between the wild-type and mutants (Figure 3C,D).
To further investigate the root growth of the maize mutant zmhapt2, full, homozygous seeds of the same size were selected for water and soil culture, and wild-type B73 was used as the control. Sample the corn on the 10th day. The results showed that under hydroponic conditions, the nodal roots length of the mutant zmhpat2 was significantly shorter than that of the wild type, whereas there was no difference in the number of the fibrous roots (Figure 3E). Similarly, under soil culture conditions, the nodal roots length of mutant zmhapt2 was still shorter than that of the wild type. In contrast to water cultivation conditions, under soil cultivation, the wild type had a significantly greater number of fibrous roots than the mutant (Figure 3E). This is because soil culture maize faces greater challenges in obtaining water and nutrients compared to water culture, requiring the plants to develop more lateral roots to absorb sufficient nutrients from the soil. The root length and dry weight of the zmhapt2 mutant and wild type were statistically analyzed under two different cultivation conditions. These results are consistent with the observed phenotypes. Among them, the difference in root length between the two reached a significant level, but there was little difference between dry and fresh weights (Figure 3F,G).
Additionally, to investigate whether the root system of the zmhpat2 mutant differed from that of the wild type at different stages, maize plants grown in the greenhouse were sampled at the middle and late stages. As shown in Figure 3, both 30-day-old and 90-day-old plants showed the same phenotype as in the earlier stage, and the nodal roots length of mutant zmhapt2 was shorter than that of wild type (Figure 3H). The statistical analysis of dry and fresh weights, as well as root length, was consistent with the observed phenotype (Figure 3I,J). Furthermore, statistical analysis of the number of nodal roots revealed that the zmhapt2 mutant had fewer nodal roots than the wild type (Figure 3J).

2.4. ZmHPAT2 Negatively Regulated Plant Height and Loose Powder

In addition to the differences in root development, aboveground development of the zmhpat2 mutant also differed from that of the wild type. The height of the mutant zmhpat2 was higher than that of the wild type at different stages of maize growth (Figure 4A–F). At the three-leaf stage, it can be observed that the height of the mutant zmhpat2 plant is higher than that of the wild type, mainly in the distance from the root system to the first leaf (Figure 4A,B). After 30 days of growth in the greenhouse, a significant difference in plant height was observed between the zmhpat2 mutant and the wild type (Figure 4C). Statistical analysis showed that this difference was highly significant (Figure 4D). The same phenotype was observed after 90 days of growth in the greenhouse (Figure 4E,F). When the mutant zmhpat2 grew to 65 days in the field, the plant height was also greater than that of the wild type (Figure 4G). Interestingly, as shown in Figure 4H, we noticed that the pollen shedding time of the mutant zmhpat2 was 9 to 10 days earlier than that of the wild type.
In addition, according to the statistics of internode lengths of the plant stems (Figure 4I,J), the height of the mutant plant was mainly due to the elongation of the internodes. The first internode above the ground was designated as S1, and the statistical data showed significant differences in the lengths of the internodes between S4 and S7. These results indicate that ZmHPAT2 plays a negative role in the height development of maize plants, and the mutant zmhpat2 showed a higher plant height than the wild type.
These results indicate that ZmHPAT2 may play a regulatory role in maize growth and development but may play a different role in maize plant height and root development.

2.5. ZmHPAT2 Is Induced to Express by AM Fungi

The promoter regions of genes induced by AM generally contain cis-acting elements related to mycorrhizal induction. Previous studies have identified four acting elements, W-BOX, CTTC, NODCON2GM, and OSEROOTNODULE, which are distributed in the promoter regions of genes induced by rhizobia and AM fungi [25,26]. The promoter of this gene was analyzed and mapped online using the RAST website. The results showed that the promoter region of ZmHPAT2 contained the aforementioned symbiosis-related acting elements (Figure 5A).
Simultaneously, based on the symbiotic transcriptomic data, we constructed a heatmap and found that ZmHPAT2 was upregulated by AM to varying degrees during different stages of symbiosis (Figure 5B). Wild-type maize B73 was symbiotic with AM fungi and samples were collected at different times for quantitative analysis. It was found that the expression of ZmHPAT2 was significantly upregulated at different stages after inoculation with the fungus compared to the control, especially in the mid and late stages of symbiosis (Figure 5C).
To further determine whether ZmHPAT2 is induced by AM fungi, we constructed the pZmHPAT2-GUS vector and transformed it into L. japonicus using Agrobacterium tumefaciens to obtain hairy roots with the fusion plasmid. The successfully transformed hairy roots were inoculated with AM fungi, and the expression of the GUS gene was detected to determine whether the target gene was induced by AM fungi. Two groups of experiments were set up: one group of transformed hairy roots was inoculated with AM fungus and the other group was treated normally as a control. As seen in the figure, the transformed hairy roots inoculated with AM fungi showed an obvious blue color. (Figure 5D).
After GUS staining, the root segments were counterstained using a magenta staining solution. The root segments were selected for preparation until the decolorization was complete. GUS expression and symbiosis in root segments were observed by microscopy. More purple arbuscular structures formed around the vascular bundles (Figure 5E). Under high magnification, GUS expression can be seen to overlap with red arbuscular structures as well as some individual arbuscular structures. This suggests that ZmHPAT2 may regulate symbiosis by influencing the arbuscular structure.

2.6. ZmHPAT2 Negatively Regulates AM Fungi Symbiosis in Maize

To study the effect of ZmHPAT2 on the symbiosis between maize and AM fungi, the mutant zmhapt2 was inoculated with AM fungi, while the wild-type inoculated AM fungi were used as controls. They were co-cultivated in the greenhouse and sampled in batches at 5, 35, and 60 d.
Microscopic analysis of mycorrhizal staining revealed that, 35 days post-inoculation (dpi), a functional symbiotic relationship was established between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and host plants, as evidenced by the presence of extensive hyphal networks and well-developed arbuscular structures within the root cortex (Figure 6A). After 60 days of symbiosis, the total colonization rate of the zmhapt2 mutant significantly increased, and it was markedly higher than that of the wild type (Figure 6B). Specific statistics showed that at 35 dpi, the colonization rate of the zmhapt2 mutant was higher than that of the wild type, with the symbiosis rate of the zmhapt2 mutant being 32%, whereas that of the wild type was only 13% (Figure 6C). In terms of fungal symbiosis, the hyphal and arbuscular structures (H+A) of the zmhapt2 mutant were significantly higher than those of the wild type. After 60 days of symbiosis, the zmhapt2 mutant contained approximately 43.6% hyphal and vesicular structures (H+V) and 32.3% hyphal, arbuscular, and vesicular structures (H+A+V), while the wild type contained only 21% hyphal and vesicular structures (H+V) and 15.3% hyphal, arbuscular, and vesicular structures (H+V+A) (Figure 6D). In contrast to the symbiosis at 35 days, the zmhapt2 mutant had fewer arbuscular structures at this point than the wild type. During the later stages of symbiosis, the arbuscular structures began to degrade and form vesicular structures.
Next, from the perspective of growth phenotype, the growth of wild-type and mutant zmhapt2 plants at 5 days after inoculation was similar to that of control plants. After 35 and 60 days of fungal inoculation, the aboveground parts of the experimental group maize plants were more robust, whereas the roots were slightly shorter than those of the control group (Figure 6E). Maize plants in different periods were sampled, and their root length, plant height, and dry and fresh weights were measured.
From the statistical results of plant height, the height of the mutant zmhpat2 was greater than that of the wild type, regardless of whether the plants were inoculated with fungi (Figure 6F). This further supports the role of the ZmHPAT2 gene in negatively regulating plant height development in maize, leading to the mutant zmhpat2 exhibiting a taller plant height than the wild type. Interestingly, after 60 days of symbiosis, the height of the non-symbiotic plants was significantly higher than that of the mycorrhizal plants, but their stem diameter was noticeably lower than that of the mycorrhizal plants. (Figure 6E,F).
According to the statistical results of root length, the root length of the mutant zmhpat2 was shorter than that of the wild type under all conditions (Figure 6G). This further confirmed that ZmHPAT2 positively regulated maize root elongation. In addition, the root length of symbiotic plants was shorter than that of non-symbiotic plants at both 30 and 60 d of symbiosis (Figure 6G). This is mainly because under conditions of nutrient deficiency, the root systems of non-symbiotic plants can only expand downward to absorb the nutrients needed for growth, while the root systems of symbiotic plants form a symbiotic relationship with AM fungi through well-developed lateral roots, and nutrients are delivered to them by AM fungi [27,28].
The dry and fresh weight statistics showed that symbiotic plants outperformed non-symbiotic plants at all stages, and the mutant zmhpat2 grew better than the wild type (Figure 6H). This is mainly because, on the one hand, the ZmHPAT2 gene negatively regulates plant height, and on the other hand, the symbiotic rate of the mutant zmhpat2 is higher than that of the wild type, resulting in stronger plant growth.
These results indicate that ZmHPAT2 plays a negative regulatory role in the symbiosis between maize and AM.

2.7. Overexpression of ZmHPAT2 Inhibits Plant Height and Mycorrhizal Symbiosis

To further study the effects of ZmHPAT2 on plant growth, development, and symbiosis regulation, a fusion vector overexpressing the ZmHPAT2 gene was constructed. ZmHPAT2 overexpression plants were obtained by Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA9402, which was transferred into the hairy roots of L. japonicus. The overexpressed plants were transferred from the medium into the culture medium and watered with a low-phosphorus nutrient solution once a week. The plants were sampled and analyzed after eight weeks of culture. RNA from wild-type MG20 and overexpressing strains was extracted, and RT-PCR was used to verify the expression of ZmHPAT2 in transgenic plants. The results showed that the expression of the ZmHPAT2 gene in transgenic plants was significantly upregulated compared to the wild type (Figure S2).
Phenotypic identification was performed on transgenic and wild-type plants cultured for eight weeks (Figure 7A). The results showed that the height of overexpressed plants was 26% lower than that of wild-type plants, and the dry and fresh weights of aboveground parts were also reduced, but there was no significant difference in root length (Figure 7B–E). Both wild-type and transgenic plants grew better than the non-symbiotic plants under fungal inoculation. The growth of wild-type plants was better than that of transgenic plants, but there was no significant difference in the length of the primary root, as in non-symbiotic plants.
Based on the above statistical analysis, the overexpression of ZmHPAT2 had an effect on plant height in non-symbiotic conditions, which inhibited plant height but had no effect on root length. Under symbiotic conditions, the growth of wild-type plants was better than that of transgenic plants. This is mainly because ZmHPAT2 negatively regulates symbiosis with AM fungi during the symbiotic process.
We also statistically analyzed the symbiosis rates of AM fungi. Microscopic examination showed that both wild-type plants and overexpressing transgenic plants established symbiosis with AM fungi. The symbiotic rate of the two plants was calculated separately, and the results showed that the symbiotic rate of the overexpressed transgenic plants was slightly reduced compared to that of the wild-type plants, but it did not reach a significant level. In addition, the arbuscular in overexpressing transgenic plants was mostly smaller and not as full of whole cells as in the wild type (Figure 7F). In addition, the wild type also contained a large number of vesicles; on the contrary, no vesicle structure was observed in the overexpressed transgenic plants (Figure 7F,G). Based on this, we counted the arbuscule size, and the results showed that overexpression plants contained more shorter arbuscule less than 30um in length, whereas the arbuscules of 30–50 um were relatively fewer, consistent with the phenotype (Figure 7H).

2.8. ZmHPAT2 Regulates the Expression of the Auxin-Responsive Gene GH3 and the Branching Degradation-Related Gene ZmMYB1

Studies have shown that HPAT family genes can modify small CLE peptides, which are involved in the polar transport of auxin in plants [22,29]. Since the root length of the mutant is shorter than that of the wild type under both symbiotic and non-symbiotic conditions, and the symbiotic rate of the mutant is higher than that of the wild type under symbiotic conditions, it is hypothesized that this may be due to the excessive accumulation of auxin in the roots. GH3 is a family of auxin response genes, which is one of the fastest responding gene families to auxin changes in plants, and maintains auxin homeostasis by conjugating excess free auxin in plants with amino acids [30]. Therefore, 13 genes of maize GH3 auxin response gene family were selected in this study [31], and qRT-PCR was used to detect the expression levels of each gene. The results showed that 12 out of 13 genes in the maize GH3 gene family were significantly downregulated in the mutant relative to the wild type (Figure 8A). Therefore, the expression of ZmGH3s gene is not inhibited in wild-type plants, and the auxin in maize can be negative feedback regulated to maintain auxin balance. The mutant zmhpat2 negatively regulates the ZmGH3s gene, resulting in compromised inactivation of free auxin in vivo, thus it inhibited root elongation, while also promoting plant height to some extent. Furthermore, auxin can positively regulate the symbiosis between maize and AM fungi, and mainly affect the arbuscular abundance, which is similar to the previous statistical results.
As previously mentioned, fewer arbusculars were observed in the mutant zmhpat2 than in the wild type at 60 days of symbiosis. In order to verify whether the reduction in arbuscular is related to the expression of arbuscular degradation related genes, the arbuscular degradation related gene ZmMYB1 was selected for quantitative analysis, and it was found that the gene was more significantly expressed in the mutant zmhpat2 (Figure 8B). The results indicated that the expression of ZmMYB1 in mutant zmhpat2 affected the degradation of arbuscular structure. After the mutation of ZmHPAT2, the expression of ZmMYB1 is upregulated, resulting in more serious arbuscular degradation than that of the wild type, which is consistent with the results in statistical arbuscular structure. However, in overexpressed transgenic plants, the results were opposite to those in mutant plants, which further verified the role of ZmHPAT2 in regulating arbuscular growth.

3. Discussion

Maize stands as one of the most widely consumed crops globally and serves as a major staple in China [32]. Germplasm innovation in maize has consistently been a central focus in agricultural research [33]. In recent years, CLE peptide hormones have emerged as a significant area of study, playing a pivotal role in various aspects of plant growth and development, including root formation, plant height regulation, and pollen development [34]. However, the effects of CLE peptides vary across different plant species. Despite their importance, research on CLE peptides in maize remains limited due to their diversity and susceptibility to inactivation in vitro. The hydroxyproline-arabinose transferase (HPAT) gene family, which is responsible for modifying CLE peptides, is essential for their functional activation [29]. Investigating the genes within this family can provide valuable insights into the roles of CLE peptide hormones. To date, most studies on HPAT have concentrated on model organisms such as Arabidopsis, tomato, and certain leguminous plants, leaving the functional analysis of HPAT genes in maize largely unexplored. Consequently, elucidating the functions of the HPAT gene family in maize holds significant potential for advancing maize research and enhancing germplasm resource development.
In this study, the evolutionary traits, structural characteristics, and functional roles of the ZmHPAT2 gene were comprehensively investigated. The ZmHPAT2 gene spans 1128 base pairs, encoding a protein of 375 amino acids, and is classified within the HPAT gene family. It features a highly conserved GT95 catalytic domain and is localized to the Golgi apparatus. Functionally, ZmHPAT2 was found to significantly influence plant height, flowering time, and root development in maize. Specifically, the zmhpat2 mutant exhibited a markedly increased plant height compared to the wild type, flowered 9 days earlier, and displayed a significantly shorter nodal root. Furthermore, heterologous overexpression of ZmHPAT2 in Lotus japonicus resulted in a substantial reduction in plant height and a delay in flowering time. These findings underscore the critical role of ZmHPAT2 in regulating key developmental processes in maize and highlight its potential functional conservation across species.
Recent studies have revealed that CLE peptides play a crucial role in regulating nodule formation in legumes and mediating symbiotic interactions between plants and microorganisms. In Lotus japonicus, the CLE peptide signals LjCLE-RS1 and LjCLE-RS2, expressed in roots, are induced by rhizobia [35]. These peptides, particularly LjCLE-RS2 and LjCLE-RS1, regulate nodule number by transmitting signals to the KLV receptor in the shoot [36,37]. Similarly, in peas, mutations impairing the CLE receptor CLV2 homolog lead to increased nodulation [38]. In soybeans, GmNARK, a homolog of CLV1, has also been reported to control nodule number [39,40,41]. Additionally, in certain plants, root-derived CLE peptide signals can suppress nodule formation [42,43]. Phylogenetic analysis further identified the gene PLENTY as a direct homolog of MtRDN1 [21]. Legumes have evolved a sophisticated mechanism, known as the autoregulation of nodulation (AON) pathway, to balance the energy demands of nodule formation for nitrogen fixation with other biological processes [44]. Genes such as LjPLENTY, MtRDN3, and PsNOD12, belonging to the HPAT gene family, mediate the arabinosylation of CLE peptides, thereby influencing AON in their respective species. These findings suggest that HPAT family genes modulate plant–rhizobia symbiosis through CLE peptide modification. However, the role of HPAT genes in maize and their interaction with symbiotic microorganisms remain unexplored.
To address this gap, this study identified the maize ZmHPAT2 gene based on reported HPAT genes and investigated its role in symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi using mutant analysis. Promoter cis-acting element analysis revealed that the ZmHPAT2 promoter contains multiple elements associated with symbiosis. Furthermore, hairy root transformation and GUS staining experiments demonstrated that ZmHPAT2 expression is induced by AM fungi. In AM symbiosis experiments, the zmhpat2 mutant exhibited a higher colonization rate than the wild type, suggesting that ZmHPAT2 negatively regulates symbiosis. At 30 days post-inoculation, the mutant displayed a higher number of arbuscules compared to the wild type, potentially due to altered auxin activity. However, by 60 days, the arbuscule number in the mutant was significantly lower than in the wild type. Quantitative analysis of ZmMYB1, a gene involved in arbuscule degradation, revealed higher expression in the mutant at 60 days, indicating more severe arbuscule degradation. This explains the reduced arbuscule number in the mutant during later symbiotic stages. These results demonstrate that ZmHPAT2 regulates arbuscule degradation in the later phases of symbiosis, highlighting the importance of the HPAT gene family in maize symbiosis. These findings align with previous studies in other species. For instance, in Medicago sativa, the CLE53 gene is upregulated by AM fungi, and its RNAi-mediated silencing enhances AM symbiosis markers [45]. Additionally, the pretreatment of Medicago sativa seedlings with RiCLE1 from Rhizophagus irregularis promotes mycorrhizal formation [46]. However, this study is the first to identify the symbiotic function of ZmHPAT2 with AM fungi in maize and to clarify its role in regulating arbuscule degradation during later symbiotic stages. This discovery not only provides a new direction for maize research but also offers novel insights into the symbiotic mechanisms between maize and AM fungi.
Furthermore, studies utilizing EMS-induced mutant lines have demonstrated that ZmHPAT2 significantly influences maize growth and development. The zmhpat2 mutant exhibits shorter roots compared to the wild type, yet its plant height surpasses that of the wild type. Notably, the pollen release time of the zmhpat2 mutant is 9 to 10 days earlier than that of the wild type. Previous research has shown that mutants of the receptor-like protein kinase 2 (RPK2/TOAD2) also display a short root phenotype, characterized by misoriented cell division in the root apical meristem (RAM) and insensitivity to CLE17 and CLE19 peptides, which inhibit root growth. This suggests that RPK2/TOAD2 regulates RAM activity and primary root growth by recognizing CLE17 and CLE19 [47]. However, the relationship between HPAT family genes and root length remains unexplored. Similarly, researchers have identified a maize dwarf mutant, d129, through EMS induction. Phenotypic analysis revealed that the dwarfism in d129 is caused by shortened internodes, accompanied by significantly reduced levels of IAA and GA3 compared to wild-type plants [48]. Additionally, maize mutants d1, d3, d5, d10, and d11 all exhibit dwarfism and reduced internode length [49,50]. The maize ZmABCB1 gene, encoding an ATP-binding auxin transporter, also shows reduced plant and ear height in its mutant [51]. These findings collectively highlight a strong correlation between auxin and plant height regulation.
In this study, we observed that 12 out of 13 auxin-responsive genes were significantly downregulated in the zmhpat2 mutant. This suggests that ZmHPAT2 may participate in auxin metabolic pathways and regulate plant development through auxin signaling, aligning with previously reported results. In rice, the CLE gene family member FON2 controls floral development [52], while FON2-like CLE protein 1 (FCP1) [53] and FON2 SPARE1 (FOS1) [54] regulate inflorescence size and floral meristem tissue. In tomatoes, mutations in CLV pathway components (SlCLV1, SlCLV2, SlCLV3, and SlHPAT3) lead to meristem expansion, resulting in clustered inflorescences and increased fruit set rates. Interestingly, treatment with arabinose-modified SLCIV3 can restore normal meristem development in these mutants [55]. These studies provide partial explanations for the earlier pollen release observed in the zmhpat2 mutant, suggesting that ZmHPAT2 may regulate maize pollen development. However, further experiments are required to confirm this relationship. In summary, ZmHPAT2 plays a multifaceted role in maize development, influencing root growth, plant height, and reproductive timing, likely through its involvement in auxin signaling and CLE peptide modification. These findings underscore the importance of ZmHPAT2 in maize growth regulation and provide a foundation for future research into its molecular mechanisms.
Based on the findings outlined above, we propose a dual regulatory mechanism for ZmHPAT2. On the one hand, we hypothesize that ZmHPAT2 modulates the expression of GH3 family genes. In the zmhpat2 mutant, the downregulation of GH3 family genes results in elevated levels of free auxin. This auxin accumulation in the roots likely contributes to the observed shortening of root length in the mutant. Concurrently, the reduced expression of GH3 genes may also explain the increased plant height in the mutant, a phenomenon consistent with previous reports. For instance, silencing GH3.8 in tomatoes has been shown to result in taller plants [56]. Following fungal inoculation, the high auxin concentration in the roots of the mutant may further enhance its symbiotic interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. On the other hand, during the later stages of symbiosis, the upregulation of ZmMYB1 genes in the zmhpat2 mutant leads to more pronounced degradation of mycorrhizal structures. However, it remains unclear whether ZmHPAT2 exerts its regulatory effects on these genes directly or indirectly through CLE peptides. This study did not explore this aspect in detail, and further experiments will be necessary to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. In summary, ZmHPAT2 appears to play a critical role in regulating auxin homeostasis and mycorrhizal symbiosis, potentially through its influence on GH3 and ZmMYB1 gene expression. Future research should focus on clarifying the direct or indirect pathways through which ZmHPAT2 mediates these effects, providing deeper insights into its functional role in maize development and symbiosis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Culture Substrates

The maize wild-type B73 inbred line and L. japonicus MG20 used in the study were obtained from the Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Resistance and High-Quality Biology at Anhui Agricultural University. The zmhpat2 mutant of B73 background maize was screened from the maize EMS mutant library of Professor Lu Xiaoduo from Anhui Agricultural University. Thereafter, the mutant was backcrossed with B73 as the recurrent parent. Through successive backcrossing of mutant plants, followed by four generations of backcrossing, homozygous mutants were obtained via self-crossing for subsequent gene functional analysis. The method for identifying the ZmHPAT2 homozygous mutant is to design specific amplification primers for approximately 1000 bp, with 4–500 bp upstream and downstream of the mutation site. After extracting the genomic DNA from the mutant plants and performing PCR amplification, PCR products with the desired bands are selected for sequencing. The sequencing results are then compared to determine whether a mutation has occurred at the mutation site, resulting in a stop gained of the amino acid sequence. The AM fungal species used was Glomus intraradices, provided by Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, China.
The maize materials for the control and experimental groups used in the AM fungal inoculation experiment were cultivated in a substrate mixture of vermiculite, perlite, and river sand in a 6:1:1 ratio, which was sterilized at 121 °C in an autoclave for 40 min before use. The remaining soil-based maize experiments used a substrate mixture of Danish soil (Jutland, Denmark) and black soil (Liaoning, China) in a 3:1 ratio, which did not require sterilization. The substrate for cultivating L. japonicus was a mixture of vermiculite (Hefei, China) and perlite (Hefei, China) in a 3:1 ratio, which was sterilized at 121 °C in an autoclave (HIRAYAMA, Tokyo, Japan) for 40 min before use.

4.2. Plant Growth and AMF Inoculation

The experiment selected mold-free, plump, and size-consistent wild-type B73 seeds and EMS-induced zmphat2 mutant seeds. The seed surfaces were disinfected by immersing them in a 12% sodium hypochlorite solution with 100 µL Tween, with continuous stirring for 10 min. Afterward, the seeds were rinsed with pure water, until the foam was completely washed away. The disinfected seeds were placed onto germination paper that had been sterilized with Captan (2.5 g of Captan dissolved in 1 L of pure water) for pre-germination. The seeds were then incubated in a growth chamber at 28 °C with 16 h of light and 6 h of darkness for germination. After germination, seeds with consistent growth were selected and transplanted into pots (35 cm × 24 cm) (Suqian, China) containing sterilized substrate. Before transplantation, the substrate was mixed with some AM fungal Gi spores, and a portion of sand spores were buried near the germinated seeds. On the day of transplantation, an appropriate number of liquid spores was added, with approximately 1000 spores per pot. After transplantation, the plants were placed in the greenhouse of the Agricultural Cultivation Garden at Anhui Agricultural University for cultivation.

4.3. RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR

Maize total RNA was isolated using the phenol–chloroform extraction method, and cDNA synthesis was performed using the HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). qRT-PCR was performed using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on a PikoReal Real-Time PCR System (TCR0096, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The expression of reference genes Zmα-Tubulin and ZmGAPDH was used as internal controls for maize. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 10−(∆Ct/3) method based on three biological replicates per sample, with expression levels normalized to those of non-inoculated AMF maize [57].

4.4. Bioinformatics Analysis

To identify the homologous sequences of the Arabidopsis HPAT gene family in maize, a BLASTP homology search was conducted in the local maize protein database using the protein sequence, with an E-value less than 10−70. After retrieving the candidate proteins, the protein sequence with the highest homology was selected, and a BLASTP homology search was then performed in the Arabidopsis protein database, with an E-value less than 10−70. If Arabidopsis family gene can be screened, it is the homologous gene of HPAT in maize. The protein sequences of the identified homologous genes were analyzed using the online platforms PFAM (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 21 February 2023) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 21 February 2023) to determine the conserved domains present in the proteins. The full sequence of ZmHPAT2 was obtained from the Gramene website (https://ensembl.gramene.org/Zea_mays/Info/Index, accessed on 22 February 2023), and combined with the annotation information of the ZmHPAT2 gene sequence and CDS sequence from the maize genome annotation file to generate the gene structure diagram of ZmHPAT2. The protein sequences of the maize HPAT gene family and the reported HPAT genes from other species were aligned using MEGA7 (version 11.0.10). The alignment file was then output, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA7 (version 11.0.10) using the Neighbor-Joining method. The upstream promoter sequence of approximately 1200 bp for ZmHPAT2 was obtained from the Gramene website (https://www.gramene.org/Zeamays/Info/Index, accessed on 22 February 2023) and aligned with the maize chromosome data for verification. Subsequently, cis-acting elements related to symbiosis were found, and these data were submitted to RAST (https://rsat.eead.csic.es/plants/dna-pattern_form.cgi, accessed on 26 February 2023) for analysis of the cis-acting elements in the ZmHPAT2 promoter, with a schematic diagram generated as output.

4.5. Subcellular Localization in Maize Protoplasts

The ZmHPAT2::GFP and 1305::GFP plasmids, along with marker plasmid, were co-transformed into maize protoplasts using PEG. After 16 h, the fluorescent signals of red fluorescent protein (RFP) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) were observed and captured using a confocal microscope (Leica LSM800, Wetzlar, Germany) with excitation wavelengths of 514 nm and 488 nm. The empty 1305::GFP plasmid was used as a control.

4.6. Mycorrhizal Staining and Symbiosis Rate Determination

The infection rate needs to be determined by using staining methods to facilitate the observation of symbiosis. The steps of fixation, clarification, acidification, staining, and decolorization are included in the staining procedure. First, the cleaned roots are cut into segments of approximately 2–3 cm in length and immersed in FAA fixative for more than 4 h in a fume hood. Next, rinse the root segments with distilled water to remove the fixative, then immerse the root segments in 10% KOH and heat them in a 90 °C water bath for an appropriate amount of time until the roots become transparent. The heating time should not be too long. Afterward, allow the root segments to cool to room temperature in the fume hood. Acidify the root segments with 5% lactic acid until they turn transparent white. Rinse the root segments with distilled water to remove the acid, then immerse them in either toluidine blue or fuchsin staining solution. Heat the root segments in a 90 °C water bath for approximately 30 min and then allow them to cool to room temperature in the fume hood. Finally, rinse the stained root segments with distilled water to remove the staining solution. Then, immerse all the root segments in lactoglycerol and shake them on a shaker at 120 rpm/min for decolorization. Replace the decolorization solution with fresh solution as it turns blue and continue until no further decolorization occurs. Afterward, prepare the stained root segments into sections, observe under a microscope, and record the results.

4.7. Induced Transformation of Hairy Roots of L. japonicus

The first step is to disinfect the seeds of L. japonicus, then use sandpaper to rub the seeds, removing the waxy layer on the surface. Next, clean the seeds with 75% alcohol for 30 s in a laminar flow cabinet, then disinfect them with 12% Kao and 0.1% Tween 20 for 10 min. During this process, the centrifuge tube should be constantly inverted and shaken to ensure the seeds are fully exposed to the disinfectant solution. Then, de-foam the seeds with 75% alcohol three times, each for 2 min. Finally, rinse the seeds with sterile water three times, each for 5 min. After disinfecting the seeds, place them in a 4 °C refrigerator for 12 h to undergo vernalization, then evenly spread them in a square dish containing 1.2% water agar. Place the seeds horizontally in a 23 °C dark incubator for 12 h, then vertically for 24 h. Until the seeds have sprouted roots about 1 cm long, proceed with Agrobacterium infection. Transfer the previously stored Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA9402 containing the target plasmid onto YMB solid medium containing antibiotics and incubate in the dark at 28 °C for 48 h until use. Prepare the B&D (Broughton and Dilworth) solid medium, sterilize it, then add 100 µM of acetosyringone (AS), and pour it into square dishes placed at a slight incline. Cut off 1/3 of the thinner edge of the solid B&D medium, and make several vertical incisions on the remaining medium. Use a sterile scalpel to cut off approximately 2 mm of the germinated root tip. Then, use tweezers to pick up the cut tip and infect it with Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA9402, which has been transformed with the target plasmid. The infected L. japonicus are placed into the pre-made incisions. Finally, seal the square dish with sealing film and medical tape to prevent contamination by unwanted microbes. First, place them in the dark at 28 °C for 24 h, then transfer to a 23 °C incubator (16/8 h light/dark cycle) to grow for about 3 weeks.

4.8. Symbiosis Between L. japonicus and AM Fungi, and GUS Staining

Root hairs of L. japonicus grown on B&D solid medium for about 3 weeks were selected. The root hairs with swollen and more branching roots were chosen for genomic validation to confirm whether they were positive plants. Transplant these positive plants into the aforementioned substrate. The experiment is divided into two groups: one group is inoculated with AM fungi, and the other group is not inoculated with AM fungi. They are cultivated for 8 weeks in a 25 °C greenhouse (16 h of light/8 h of darkness) and irrigated with a customized Hoagland nutrient solution. After the cultivation is complete, the root hairs of the L. japonicus are sampled, washed, and then immersed in GUS staining solution for staining. The samples are then treated in a dark environment at 37 °C in an incubator for 24 h. GUS formula: 0.05 g Trypan blue, lactic acid: glycerol: distilled water (1:1:1) 100 mL.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The data were collected from three independent replicate experiments, analyzed with Excel 2019, and visualized using GraphPad Prism (version 8.0.2). Student’s t-test was used to determine significant differences, with * p ≤ 0.05 indicating a significant difference, ** p ≤ 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and “ns” indicating no significant difference.

5. Conclusions

The ZmHPAT2 gene, with a coding region of 1128 bp, encodes a protein of 375 amino acids. It is located on maize chromosome 6 and contains the GT95 glycosyltransferase catalytic domain, which is localized to the Golgi apparatus. Promoter cis-acting element analysis revealed the presence of multiple symbiosis-related elements, suggesting a role in symbiotic interactions. Through symbiosis heatmap analysis, quantitative PCR, and Lotus japonicus root hair transformation experiments, it was demonstrated that ZmHPAT2 expression is induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi.
Studies using EMS-induced mutants revealed that ZmHPAT2 significantly influences maize growth and development, as well as its symbiosis with AM fungi. The zmhpat2 mutant exhibited shorter root systems compared to the wild type but displayed enhanced plant height. In terms of symbiosis, the zmhpat2 mutant showed a higher symbiotic rate, characterized by increased arbuscule abundance during the mid-symbiotic phase and a greater number of vesicles during the late symbiotic phase. These findings suggest that ZmHPAT2 may act as a negative regulator of symbiosis.
Quantitative analysis of the auxin-responsive ZmGH3 gene family revealed that 12 out of 13 genes were significantly downregulated in the zmhpat2 mutant. This indicates that ZmHPAT2 likely participates in the auxin metabolic pathway, regulating plant development and fungal symbiosis through auxin signaling modulation. Additionally, quantitative analysis of the arbuscule degradation gene ZmMYB1 showed that its expression was significantly upregulated in the zmhpat2 mutant, consistent with the observed reduction in arbuscule numbers during the later symbiotic stages. This suggests that ZmHPAT2 plays a role in regulating arbuscule degradation in the later phases of symbiosis.
In summary, ZmHPAT2 is a key regulator of maize growth, development, and AM symbiosis, likely through its involvement in auxin signaling and arbuscule degradation pathways. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying plant-fungal interactions and auxin-mediated developmental processes in maize.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14101438/s1, Figure S1: Map of zmhpat2 mutation site; Figure S2: Analysis of ZmHPAT2 relative expression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.X.; methodology, G.W.; software, K.X.; validation, M.S.; formal analysis, G.W.; investigation, L.S.; resources, X.L.; data curation, Y.N.; writing—original draft, K.X.; writing—review and editing, K.X. and B.C.; visualization, Y.N.; supervision, G.W.; project administration, B.C.; funding acquisition, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. U21A20235).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Sun Yat-sen University for providing the AMF species Glomus intraradices. Meanwhile, we thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. U21A20235).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ramazan, S.; Nazir, I.; Yousuf, W.; John, R. Environmental stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays): Role of polyamine metabolism. Funct. Plant Biol. FPB 2023, 50, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ma, Y.; Tan, R.; Zhao, J. Chilling Tolerance in Maize: Insights into Advances-Toward Physio-Biochemical Responses’ and QTL/Genes’ Identification. Plants 2022, 11, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, Y.; Zang, H.; Splettstößer, T.; Kumar, A.; Xu, X.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Pausch, J. Plant intraspecific competition and growth stage alter carbon and nitrogen mineralization in the rhizosphere. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1231–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hochholdinger, F.; Yu, P.; Marcon, C. Genetic Control of Root System Development in Maize. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhu, J.; Ingram, P.A.; Benfey, P.N.; Elich, T. From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Uga, Y.; Sugimoto, K.; Ogawa, S.; Rane, J.; Ishitani, M.; Hara, N.; Kitomi, Y.; Inukai, Y.; Ono, K.; Kanno, N.; et al. Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bruce, W.; Desbons, P.; Crasta, O.; Folkerts, O. Gene expression profiling of two related maize inbred lines with contrasting root-lodging traits. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sha, Y.; Zhao, S.; Hao, Z.; Liu, Z.; Hu, W.; Feng, G.; Chen, F.; Mi, G. Root Lodging Resistance in Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Conservative Strip-Till Cultivation System. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2025, 211, e70008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carlson, A.D. Proem. Q. Rev. Biol. 2016, 91, 245–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rich, M.K.; Nouri, E.; Courty, P.-E.; Reinhardt, D. Diet of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: Bread and Butter? Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, W.; Guo, W.; Le, L.; Yu, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Lu, X.; Qiao, H.; et al. Integration of high-throughput phenotyping, GWAS, and predictive models reveals the genetic architecture of plant height in maize. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 354–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, F.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wang, M.; Lu, X.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tan, B.C.; Li, C.; et al. ZmTE1 promotes plant height by regulating intercalary meristem formation and internode cell elongation in maize. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 526–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mu, Q.; Wei, J.; Longest, H.K.; Liu, H.; Char, S.N.; Hinrichsen, J.T.; Tibbs-Cortes, L.E.; Schoenbaum, G.R.; Yang, B.; Li, X.; et al. A MYB transcription factor underlying plant height in sorghum qHT7.1 and maize Brachytic 1 loci. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2024, 120, 2172–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hong, Z.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Umemura, K.; Uozu, S.; Fujioka, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Yoshida, S.; Ashikari, M.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M. A rice brassinosteroid-deficient mutant, ebisu dwarf (d2), is caused by a loss of function of a new member of cytochrome P450. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2900–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hudson, D.; Guevara, D.R.; Hand, A.J.; Xu, Z.; Hao, L.; Chen, X.; Zhu, T.; Bi, Y.-M.; Rothstein, S.J. Rice Cytokinin GATA Transcription Factor1 Regulates Chloroplast Development and Plant Architecture. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pingali, P.L. Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12302–12308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ogawa-Ohnishi, M.; Matsushita, W.; Matsubayashi, Y. Identification of three hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 9, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lamport, D.T.; Miller, D.H. Hydroxyproline arabinosides in the plant kingdom. Plant Physiol. 1971, 48, 454–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. MacAlister, C.A.; Ortiz-Ramirez, C.; Becker, J.D.; Feijo, J.A.; Lippman, Z.B. Hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferase mutants oppositely alter tip growth in Arabidopsis thaliana and Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2016, 85, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Isidra-Arellano, M.C.; Pozas-Rodríguez, E.A.; Del Rocío Reyero-Saavedra, M.; Arroyo-Canales, J.; Ferrer-Orgaz, S.; Del Socorro Sánchez-Correa, M.; Cardenas, L.; Covarrubias, A.A.; Valdés-López, O. Inhibition of legume nodulation by Pi deficiency is dependent on the autoregulation of nodulation (AON) pathway. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2020, 103, 1125–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoro, E.; Nishida, H.; Ogawa-Ohnishi, M.; Yoshida, C.; Suzaki, T.; Matsubayashi, Y.; Kawaguchi, M. PLENTY, a hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferase, negatively regulates root nodule symbiosis in Lotus japonicus. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kassaw, T.; Nowak, S.; Schnabel, E.; Frugoli, J. ROOT DETERMINED NODULATION1 Is Required for M. truncatula CLE12, But Not CLE13, Peptide Signaling through the SUNN Receptor Kinase. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 2445–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jaffri, S.R.F.; Scheer, H.; MacAlister, C.A. The hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferase FIN4 is required for tomato pollen intine development. Plant Reprod. 2023, 36, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schnabel, E.L.; Kassaw, T.K.; Smith, L.S.; Marsh, J.F.; Oldroyd, G.E.; Long, S.R.; Frugoli, J.A. The ROOT DETERMINED NODULATION1 gene regulates nodule number in roots of Medicago truncatula and defines a highly conserved, uncharacterized plant gene family. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Wu, J.; Xie, K.; Li, X. LjAMT2;2 Promotes Ammonium Nitrogen Transport during Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Symbiosis in Lotus japonicus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Y.; Liao, J.; Wu, J.; Huang, H.; Yuan, Z.; Yang, W.; Wu, X.; Li, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Soybean DEAD-Box Gene Family and Expression Response to Rhizobia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, W.; Ye, T.; Sun, Q.; Niu, T.; Zhang, J. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Alters Root System Architecture in Camellia sinensis L. as Revealed by RNA-Seq Analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 777357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stevens, K.J.; Wall, C.B.; Janssen, J.A. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on seedling growth and development of two wetland plants, Bidens frondosa L., and Eclipta prostrata (L.) L., grown under three levels of water availability. Mycorrhiza 2011, 21, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, C.; Reid, J.B.; Foo, E. The role of CLV1, CLV2 and HPAT homologues in the nitrogen-regulation of root development. Physiol. Plant 2020, 170, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liao, D.; Wang, S.; Cui, M.; Liu, J.; Chen, A.; Xu, G. Phytohormones Regulate the Development of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Staswick, P.E.; Serban, B.; Rowe, M.; Tiryaki, I.; Maldonado, M.T.; Maldonado, M.C.; Suza, W. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pajic, Z.; Radosavljevic, M.; Filipovic, M.; Todorovic, G.; Srdic, J.; Pavlov, M. Breeding of speciality maize for industrial purposes. Genetika 2010, 42, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fatima, S.; Zeb, S.Z.; Tariq, M.; Nishat, Y.; Mohamed, H.I.; Siddiqui, M.A. Role of CLE peptide signaling in root-knot nematode parasitism of plants. Planta 2025, 261, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yamaguchi, Y.L.; Ishida, T.; Sawa, S. CLE peptides and their signaling pathways in plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4813–4826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Okamoto, S.; Ohnishi, E.; Sato, S.; Takahashi, H.; Nakazono, M.; Tabata, S.; Kawaguchi, M. Nod Factor/Nitrate-Induced CLE Genes that Drive HAR1-Mediated Systemic Regulation of Nodulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Miyazawa, H.; Oka-Kira, E.; Sato, N.; Takahashi, H.; Wu, G.-J.; Sato, S.; Hayashi, M.; Betsuyaku, S.; Nakazono, M.; Tabata, S.; et al. The receptor-like kinase KLAVIER mediates systemic regulation of nodulation and non-symbiotic shoot development in Lotus japonicus. Development 2010, 137, 4317–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oka-Kira, E.; Tateno, K.; Miura, K.; Haga, T.; Hayashi, M.; Harada, K.; Sato, S.; Tabata, S.; Shikazono, N.; Tanaka, A.; et al. klavier (klv), A novel hypernodulation mutant of Lotus japonicus affected in vascular tissue organization and floral induction. Plant J. 2005, 44, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krusell, L.; Sato, N.; Fukuhara, I.; Koch, B.E.V.; Grossmann, C.; Okamoto, S.; Oka-Kira, E.; Otsubo, Y.; Aubert, G.; Nakagawa, T.; et al. The Clavata2 genes of pea and Lotus japonicus affect autoregulation of nodulation. Plant J. 2011, 65, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schnabel, E.; Journet, E.P.; de Carvalho-Niebel, F.; Duc, G.; Frugoli, J. The Medicago truncatula SUNN gene encodes a CLV1-like leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase that regulates nodule number and root length. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 58, 809–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Searle, I.R.; Men, A.E.; Laniya, T.S.; Buzas, D.M.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Carroll, B.J.; Gresshoff, P.M. Long-distance signaling in nodulation directed by a CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase. Science 2003, 299, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reid, D.E.; Li, D.; Ferguson, B.J.; Gresshoff, P.M. Structure-function analysis of the GmRIC1 signal peptide and CLE domain required for nodulation control in soybean. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1575–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Reid, D.E.; Ferguson, B.J.; Gresshoff, P.M. Inoculation- and Nitrate-Induced CLE Peptides of Soybean Control NARK-Dependent Nodule Formation. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mortier, V.; Den Herder, G.; Whitford, R.; Van de Velde, W.; Rombauts, S.; D’Haeseleer, K.; Holsters, M.; Goormachtig, S. CLE Peptides Control Medicago truncatula Nodulation Locally and Systemically. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lodwig, E.M.; Hosie, A.H.F.; Bordès, A.; Findlay, K.; Allaway, D.; Karunakaran, R.; Downie, J.A.; Poole, P.S. Amino-acid cycling drives nitrogen fixation in the legume: Rhizobium symbiosis. Nature 2003, 422, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mueller, L.M.; Flokova, K.; Schnabel, E.; Sun, X.; Fei, Z.; Frugoli, J.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; Harrison, M.J. A CLE-SUNN module regulates strigolactone content and fungal colonization in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Le Marquer, M.; Becard, G.; Frey, N.F.D. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi possess a CLAVATA3/embryo surrounding region-related gene that positively regulates symbiosis. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1030–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Racolta, A.; Nodine, M.D.; Davies, K.; Lee, C.; Rowe, S.; Velazco, Y.; Wellington, R.; Tax, F.E. A Common Pathway of Root Growth Control and Response to CLE Peptides Through Two Receptor Kinases in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2018, 208, 687–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wei, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, H.; Lin, Z. A new allele of the Brachytic2 gene in maize can efficiently modify plant architecture. Heredity 2018, 121, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Teng, F.; Zhai, L.; Liu, R.; Bai, W.; Wang, L.; Huo, D.; Tao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Z. ZmGA3ox2, a candidate gene for a major QTL, qPH3.1, for plant height in maize. Plant J. 2013, 73, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Y.; Tan, B.-C. New insight in the Gibberellin biosynthesis and signal transduction. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e1000140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Multani, D.S.; Briggs, S.P.; Chamberlin, M.A.; Blakeslee, J.J.; Murphy, A.S.; Johal, G.S. Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants. Science 2003, 302, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Suzaki, T.; Toriba, T.; Fujimoto, M.; Tsutsumi, N.; Kitano, H.; Hirano, H.-Y. Conservation and diversification of meristem maintenance mechanism in Oryza sativa Function of the FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER2 gene. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 1591–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Suzaki, T.; Yoshida, A.; Hirano, H.-Y. Functional diversification of CLAVATA3-related CLE proteins in meristem maintenance in rice. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2049–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Suzaki, T.; Ohneda, M.; Toriba, T.; Yoshida, A.; Hirano, H.-Y. FON2 SPARE1 Redundantly Regulates Floral Meristem Maintenance with FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER2 in Rice. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, C.; Liberatore, K.L.; MacAlister, C.A.; Huang, Z.; Chu, Y.-H.; Jiang, K.; Brooks, C.; Ogawa-Ohnishi, M.; Xiong, G.; Pauly, M.; et al. A cascade of arabinosyltransferases controls shoot meristem size in tomato. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, M.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Xiang, H.; Liu, Y.; He, Y.; Qi, M.; Li, T. Tomato YABBY2b controls plant height through regulating indole-3-acetic acid amidosynthetase GH3.8 expression. Plant Sci. 2020, 297, 110530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liao, D.; Chen, X.; Chen, A.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Gu, M.; Sun, S.; Xu, G. The Characterization of Six Auxin-Induced Tomato GH3 Genes Uncovers a Member, SlGH3.4, Strongly Responsive to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis and characterization of ZmHPAT2. (A) Evolutionary analysis of the HPAT gene family in maize (Zea mays) and other species: Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Medicago truncatula (Mt), Glycine max (Gm), Oryza sativa (Os), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Lotus japonicus (Lj), and Pisum sativum (Ps). (B) Analysis of the domains of the maize HPAT gene family and the HPAT gene family reported in Arabidopsis, green represents the N-terminal conserved region. (C) Protein sequence alignment of the maize HPAT gene family and HPAT genes from other species. The red bracketed region represents the transmembrane region, the purple bracketed region represents the variable region, the blue bracket represents the highly conserved catalytic domain of GT95, and the highly conserved amino acids are shown in black.
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis and characterization of ZmHPAT2. (A) Evolutionary analysis of the HPAT gene family in maize (Zea mays) and other species: Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Medicago truncatula (Mt), Glycine max (Gm), Oryza sativa (Os), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Lotus japonicus (Lj), and Pisum sativum (Ps). (B) Analysis of the domains of the maize HPAT gene family and the HPAT gene family reported in Arabidopsis, green represents the N-terminal conserved region. (C) Protein sequence alignment of the maize HPAT gene family and HPAT genes from other species. The red bracketed region represents the transmembrane region, the purple bracketed region represents the variable region, the blue bracket represents the highly conserved catalytic domain of GT95, and the highly conserved amino acids are shown in black.
Plants 14 01438 g001
Figure 2. Subcellular Localization of ZmHPAT2. (A) Schematic diagram of the construction of the subcellular localization vector. (B) Subcellular localization of ZmHPAT2-GFP in protoplast of maize. Four visual fields were observed: bright channel (Bright), green channel (GFP), red channel (RFP), and merged. Scalebar = 10 µm.
Figure 2. Subcellular Localization of ZmHPAT2. (A) Schematic diagram of the construction of the subcellular localization vector. (B) Subcellular localization of ZmHPAT2-GFP in protoplast of maize. Four visual fields were observed: bright channel (Bright), green channel (GFP), red channel (RFP), and merged. Scalebar = 10 µm.
Plants 14 01438 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of the root development characteristics of the zmhpat2 mutant. (A) Root growth phenotype of maize mutants during germination, the scale bar on the image represents 2 cm. (B) Field maize root phenotype, with the scale bar representing 10 cm. (C) Length of primary root during germination. (D) Root length of 65 days maize. (E) Early-stage root phenotype of water culture (left) and soil culture (right), with the scale bar representing 10 cm. (F) Water culture (left) and soil culture (right) maize root length. (G) Fresh weight (left) and dry weight (right) of 10 day maize root. (H) Root phenotype of maize at 30 and 90 days of greenhouse cultivation, with the scale bar representing 10 cm. (I) Fresh weight (left) and dry weight (right) of maize roots at 30 and 90 days of greenhouse cultivation. (J) Root length of maize at 30 and 90 days (left) and Number of nodal roots of maize at 30 and 90 days (right). Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Figure 3. Analysis of the root development characteristics of the zmhpat2 mutant. (A) Root growth phenotype of maize mutants during germination, the scale bar on the image represents 2 cm. (B) Field maize root phenotype, with the scale bar representing 10 cm. (C) Length of primary root during germination. (D) Root length of 65 days maize. (E) Early-stage root phenotype of water culture (left) and soil culture (right), with the scale bar representing 10 cm. (F) Water culture (left) and soil culture (right) maize root length. (G) Fresh weight (left) and dry weight (right) of 10 day maize root. (H) Root phenotype of maize at 30 and 90 days of greenhouse cultivation, with the scale bar representing 10 cm. (I) Fresh weight (left) and dry weight (right) of maize roots at 30 and 90 days of greenhouse cultivation. (J) Root length of maize at 30 and 90 days (left) and Number of nodal roots of maize at 30 and 90 days (right). Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Plants 14 01438 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of the aboveground phenotype of zmhpat2 mutant plants. (A) Three-leaf stage plant growth phenotype, scale bar is 10 cm. (B) Height of 10 days plant. (C) Phenotype of plants grown in greenhouse for 30 days, scale bar is 10 cm. (D) Height of 30 days plant. (E) Phenotype of plants grown in greenhouse for 90 days, scale bar is 10 cm. (F) Height of 90 days plant. (G) Flowering phenotype of the wild type and mutant zmhpat2, scale bar is 10 cm. (H) Pollen shedding time statistics of the wild type and mutant zmhpat2. (I) Intercalary phenotype of the wild type and mutant zmhpat2, scale bar is 20 cm. (J) Statistical analysis of internode length. All the zmhpat2 are compared with their respective wild types. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. Analysis of the aboveground phenotype of zmhpat2 mutant plants. (A) Three-leaf stage plant growth phenotype, scale bar is 10 cm. (B) Height of 10 days plant. (C) Phenotype of plants grown in greenhouse for 30 days, scale bar is 10 cm. (D) Height of 30 days plant. (E) Phenotype of plants grown in greenhouse for 90 days, scale bar is 10 cm. (F) Height of 90 days plant. (G) Flowering phenotype of the wild type and mutant zmhpat2, scale bar is 10 cm. (H) Pollen shedding time statistics of the wild type and mutant zmhpat2. (I) Intercalary phenotype of the wild type and mutant zmhpat2, scale bar is 20 cm. (J) Statistical analysis of internode length. All the zmhpat2 are compared with their respective wild types. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Plants 14 01438 g004
Figure 5. Analysis of mycorrhizal-induced ZmHPAT2 expression. (A) Analysis of AM fungi symbiosis regulatory elements in the promoters of ZmHPAT2. (B) Heatmap of the ZmHPAT2 gene expression induced by AMF at different stages. (C) The relative expression level of ZmHPAT2 in maize roots inoculated with AMF and non-inoculated controls measured was by qRT-PCR; 15d, 35d, 60d, respectively, represent the wild-type B73 and AM symbiosis at 15 days, 35 days, and 60 days; WT+A represent AM fungi-inoculated wild-type plants; WT-A represent non-inoculated wild-type controls. (D) Detection of GUS expression by pZmHPAT2 induced by AM fungi; −AMF indicates non-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and +AMF denotes inoculation with AM fungi. (E) Local microscopic magnification of roots with fuchsine. The arrow in the left image indicates the overlap of GUS expression with the red arbuscular structures, with a scale bar of 200 µm. The arrow in the right image points to the purple arbuscular structures formed around the vascular bundles, with a scale bar of 100 µm. Asterisks indicate significant differences: ** represents p < 0.01; "ns" indicating no significant difference, statistical method used was Student’s t-test.
Figure 5. Analysis of mycorrhizal-induced ZmHPAT2 expression. (A) Analysis of AM fungi symbiosis regulatory elements in the promoters of ZmHPAT2. (B) Heatmap of the ZmHPAT2 gene expression induced by AMF at different stages. (C) The relative expression level of ZmHPAT2 in maize roots inoculated with AMF and non-inoculated controls measured was by qRT-PCR; 15d, 35d, 60d, respectively, represent the wild-type B73 and AM symbiosis at 15 days, 35 days, and 60 days; WT+A represent AM fungi-inoculated wild-type plants; WT-A represent non-inoculated wild-type controls. (D) Detection of GUS expression by pZmHPAT2 induced by AM fungi; −AMF indicates non-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and +AMF denotes inoculation with AM fungi. (E) Local microscopic magnification of roots with fuchsine. The arrow in the left image indicates the overlap of GUS expression with the red arbuscular structures, with a scale bar of 200 µm. The arrow in the right image points to the purple arbuscular structures formed around the vascular bundles, with a scale bar of 100 µm. Asterisks indicate significant differences: ** represents p < 0.01; "ns" indicating no significant difference, statistical method used was Student’s t-test.
Plants 14 01438 g005
Figure 6. zmhpat2 mutant and AM fungi symbiotic effect analysis. (A) Trypan blue staining of mycorrhizal roots at 35 days of symbiosis. (B) Trypan blue staining of mycorrhizal roots at 60 days of symbiosis. (C) Mycorrhizal colonization rate statistics at 35 days of symbiosis. (D) Mycorrhizal colonization rate statistics at 60 days of symbiosis, H: Hyphae; A: Arbuscule; V: Vesicle. (E) Phenotypes of wild-type and zmhpat2 mutant before and after symbiosis with AM fungi. The scale bar is 20 cm. (F) Plant height at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. (G) Root length at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. (H) Fresh weight at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. (I) Dry weight at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. The +A and −A zmhpat2 are compared with their respective wild types. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Figure 6. zmhpat2 mutant and AM fungi symbiotic effect analysis. (A) Trypan blue staining of mycorrhizal roots at 35 days of symbiosis. (B) Trypan blue staining of mycorrhizal roots at 60 days of symbiosis. (C) Mycorrhizal colonization rate statistics at 35 days of symbiosis. (D) Mycorrhizal colonization rate statistics at 60 days of symbiosis, H: Hyphae; A: Arbuscule; V: Vesicle. (E) Phenotypes of wild-type and zmhpat2 mutant before and after symbiosis with AM fungi. The scale bar is 20 cm. (F) Plant height at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. (G) Root length at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. (H) Fresh weight at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. (I) Dry weight at 30 and 60 days of symbiosis. The +A and −A zmhpat2 are compared with their respective wild types. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Plants 14 01438 g006
Figure 7. Functional analysis of ZmHPAT2 the overexpression plants. (A) Phenotypes of ZmHPAT2 overexpression transgenic L. japonicus symbiotic and non-symbiotic with AM fungi. (B) Fresh weight statistic of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants. (C) Dry weight statistic of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants. (D) Plant height of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants. (E) Root length of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants; EV-A represents MG20 without AM fungus inoculation, while ZmHPAT2-OE-A refers to the overexpressed ZmHPAT2 L. japonicus roots without AM fungus inoculation; EV+A represents MG20 with AM fungus inoculation, and ZmHPAT2-OE+A refers to the overexpressed ZmHPAT2 L. japonicus roots with AM fungus inoculation. (F) Trypan blue staining of mycorrhizal roots in control and ZmHPAT2 overexpression transgenic plants. (G) Mycorrhizal colonization rate statistics in symbiotic plants. (H) Percentage of different arbuscule sizes in symbiotic plants. H: Hyphae; A: Arbuscule; V: Vesicles; <30 indicates arbuscule size smaller than 30 μm, 30–50 represents arbuscule sizes ranging between 30 and 50 μm, 50–70 represents arbuscule sizes ranging between 50 and 70 μm. The +A and −A ZmHPAT2-OE are compared with their respective EV. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Figure 7. Functional analysis of ZmHPAT2 the overexpression plants. (A) Phenotypes of ZmHPAT2 overexpression transgenic L. japonicus symbiotic and non-symbiotic with AM fungi. (B) Fresh weight statistic of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants. (C) Dry weight statistic of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants. (D) Plant height of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants. (E) Root length of symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants; EV-A represents MG20 without AM fungus inoculation, while ZmHPAT2-OE-A refers to the overexpressed ZmHPAT2 L. japonicus roots without AM fungus inoculation; EV+A represents MG20 with AM fungus inoculation, and ZmHPAT2-OE+A refers to the overexpressed ZmHPAT2 L. japonicus roots with AM fungus inoculation. (F) Trypan blue staining of mycorrhizal roots in control and ZmHPAT2 overexpression transgenic plants. (G) Mycorrhizal colonization rate statistics in symbiotic plants. (H) Percentage of different arbuscule sizes in symbiotic plants. H: Hyphae; A: Arbuscule; V: Vesicles; <30 indicates arbuscule size smaller than 30 μm, 30–50 represents arbuscule sizes ranging between 30 and 50 μm, 50–70 represents arbuscule sizes ranging between 50 and 70 μm. The +A and −A ZmHPAT2-OE are compared with their respective EV. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Plants 14 01438 g007
Figure 8. ZmHPAT2 regulates the expression of related genes. (A) The relative expression of ZmGH3S genes in zmhpat2 mutant maize. (B) Relative expression level of the arbuscule degradation gene ZmMYB1 under AM fungal inoculation. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Figure 8. ZmHPAT2 regulates the expression of related genes. (A) The relative expression of ZmGH3S genes in zmhpat2 mutant maize. (B) Relative expression level of the arbuscule degradation gene ZmMYB1 under AM fungal inoculation. Asterisks indicate significant differences and * represents p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. The unmarked represents “ns” (not significant). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.
Plants 14 01438 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, K.; Wang, G.; Ni, Y.; Shi, M.; Sun, L.; Cheng, B.; Li, X. ZmHPAT2 Regulates Maize Growth and Development and Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Plants 2025, 14, 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101438

AMA Style

Xie K, Wang G, Ni Y, Shi M, Sun L, Cheng B, Li X. ZmHPAT2 Regulates Maize Growth and Development and Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Plants. 2025; 14(10):1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Kailing, Guoqing Wang, Ying Ni, Minghui Shi, Lixue Sun, Beijiu Cheng, and Xiaoyu Li. 2025. "ZmHPAT2 Regulates Maize Growth and Development and Mycorrhizal Symbiosis" Plants 14, no. 10: 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101438

APA Style

Xie, K., Wang, G., Ni, Y., Shi, M., Sun, L., Cheng, B., & Li, X. (2025). ZmHPAT2 Regulates Maize Growth and Development and Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Plants, 14(10), 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101438

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop