Next Article in Journal
Unmasking the Aliphatic Repertoire: New Polyunsaturated Metabolites in Bupleurum falcatum sensu lato Provide Chemotaxonomic Insights
Previous Article in Journal
Predictive Modeling of Lignocellulosic Content in Crop Straws Using NIR Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trans-Kingdom RNA Dialogues: miRNA and milRNA Networks as Biotechnological Tools for Sustainable Crop Defense and Pathogen Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of VQ Gene Family in Salix suchowensis Under Abiotic Stresses and Hormone Treatments

1
Institute of Industrial Crops, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230001, China
2
College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2025, 14(10), 1431; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101431
Submission received: 25 March 2025 / Revised: 7 May 2025 / Accepted: 8 May 2025 / Published: 10 May 2025

Abstract

The valine glutamine (VQ) proteins are transcription cofactors involved in various aspects of plant biology, including growth, development, and stress resistance, making them an attractive target for genetic engineering aimed at enhancing plant resilience and productivity. However, comprehensive reports or systematic studies on VQ cofactors in Salix suchowensis remain lacking. In this study, we analyzed SsVQ genes using bioinformatics methods based on the Salix suchowensis genome database. Expression profiles were further investigated through qRT-PCR under six treatments: PEG, NaCl, 40 °C, ABA, SA, and MeJA. A total of 39 SsVQ genes were identified, with phylogenetic analysis classifying them into seven groups. Collinearity analysis suggested that SsVQ gene amplification primarily resulted from whole genome duplication (WGD) or segmental duplication events. Ka/Ks ratios indicated that willow VQ genes have undergone predominantly purifying selection. Gene structure analysis revealed that SsVQ genes are intronless. Multiple sequence alignment showed that SsVQ19 shares similarity with PtVQ27, containing a hydrophilic threonine (T) residue preceding the VQ amino acid residues. Furthermore, genes within each group exhibited conserved structures and VQ motifs. Promoter and expression analyses suggested the potential roles of SsVQ genes in regulating willow responses to environmental stresses and hormonal signals. Most SsVQ genes displayed differential expression at specific time points, with six members (SsVQ2, SsVQ9, SsVQ12, SsVQ23, SsVQ32, and SsVQ34) showing sustained high-amplitude expression profiles across treatments. Notably, SsVQ34 demonstrated pronounced transcriptional induction under PEG stress, with expression levels upregulated by 62.29-fold (1 h), 49.21-fold (6 h), 99.9-fold (12 h), and 201.50-fold (24 h). Certain SsVQ genes showed co-expression under abiotic/hormonal stresses, implying synergistic functions. Paralogous gene pairs exhibited stronger co-expression than non-paralogous pairs. This study provides novel insights into the structural and functional characteristics of the VQ gene family in Salix suchowensis, establishing a foundation for future research on the stress-resistance mechanisms of willow VQ genes.

1. Introduction

Salix suchowensis is a shrub willow species that is native to China [1,2]. This species is dioecious [3]; it has the characteristics of small individual size [4], rapid maturation [4], and easy reproduction [5]. Its flexible and uniform branches make it an ideal material for willow weaving, while its products are safe, environmentally friendly, and durable. Notably, S. suchowensis is not only a fast-growing economic tree but also an ecologically valuable species [6]. With strong tolerance to waterlogging, it grows well on riverbanks, making it an excellent tree species for soil and water conservation and embankment consolidation [7]. The individual size and short juvenile phase facilitate large-scale field experiments, and there are abundant natural variations, making it an ideal material for genetic research [2]. The recent publication of its full genome sequence further enables molecular genetic studies [2].
Transcription cofactors interact with transcription factor proteins to form complexes, achieving precise and effective regulation of target genes. Research has shown that transcription cofactors can affect DNA-binding ability, transcriptional activation or inhibition activity, subcellular localization, protein stability, and so on [8]. The VQ protein is a type of transcriptional cofactor, widely present in plants, named after its highly conserved VQ motif (FxxhVQxhTG), where x is any amino acid residue and h is a hydrophobic amino acid residue. VQ motifs can be categorized based on differences in the last three amino acids (hTG) [9,10]. For example, Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) VQ motifs include six combinations (LTG, FTG, VTG, YTG, LTS and LTD), whereas Oryza sativa (rice) and Populus trichocarpa (poplar) have four (LTG, FTG, VTG, and ITG) and three (LTG, FTG, and VTG), respectively [11,12,13]. The amino acid sequences outside the VQ motif exhibit diversity, which is consistent with the functional diversity of the VQ protein family [14]. Additionally, most VQ genes lack introns and encode relatively short proteins (<300 amino acids) [15].
VQ genes are involved in plant growth, development, and stress responses [16]. For instance, AtVQ29 functions as a transcriptional repressor, inhibiting hypocotyl elongation in response to light and potentially enhancing the transcriptional activity of PIF1 during early seedling development [17]. BoVQ25-1 plays an important role in pollen germination [18]. AtVQ18 and AtVQ26 act as antagonists of ABI5 to maintain precise levels of ABA signaling, thereby finely regulating seed germination and seedling establishment [19]. AtVQ12 and AtVQ29 negatively regulate plant basal resistance against Botrytis cinerea [20]. TaVQ4-D overexpression in Arabidopsis and wheat enhances drought tolerance, whereas its silencing in wheat reduces drought tolerance [21]. The Arabidopsis lines overexpressing PeVQ28 enhanced resistance to salt stress and sensitivity to ABA, along with the upregulation of salt- and ABA-responsive genes [22].
In previous studies, VQ proteins primarily interact with WRKY transcription factors to regulate physiological processes. AtVQ10 physically interacts with AtWRKY8, positively regulating immunity against B. cinerea [23]. AtVQ20, expressed specifically in pollen, interacts with AtWRKY2/34 to control pollen development [24]. SIBs inhibit WRKY75 function, negatively modulating ABA-mediated leaf senescence and seed germination [25]. A regulatory module, OsPUB73-OsVQ25-OsWRKY53, finetunes rice broad-spectrum disease resistance and growth at transcriptional and posttranslational levels [26]. TaVQ25-A functions as a positive regulator of ABA-related leaf senescence by interacting with TaWRKY133 in vitro and in vivo [27]. MdVQ10 promotes wound-triggered leaf senescence in association with MdWRKY75 and undergoes antagonistic modulation of MdCML15/MdJAZs in apple [28]. In tomato, SlWRKY37 positively regulates JA and dark-induced leaf senescence and interacts with SlVQ7 to improve its own stability [29]. In shoots, AtVQ10 activation of cell division was counteracted by AtWRKY33-exerted repression, thus leading to a dwarf bushy phenotype in plants with enhanced AtVQ10 expression in a wrky33 knock-out background [30]. Although direct VQ-WRKY interaction evidence in S. suchowensis is lacking, studies in its close relative S. psammophila revealed that SpWRKY33 overexpression in Arabidopsis significantly upregulated a VQ gene, implicating its potential role in SpWRKY33-mediated drought tolerance [31].
To date, the VQ gene family has been genome-wide identified in plants such as Arabidopsis [11], rice [12,32], poplar [13], grape [33], and bamboo [34]. However, no comprehensive identification or expression profile analysis of the VQ gene family has been reported in S. suchowensis. S. suchowensis exhibits strong environmental resilience, and studying its VQ gene family may reveal novel stress-tolerance mechanisms applicable to plant improvement. In this study, we identified 39 SsVQ genes in the S. suchowensis genome and analyzed their sequence characteristics, protein structures, and phylogenetic relationships. Additionally, we selected 13 paralogous pairs (26 genes) from each phylogenetic group for qRT-PCR analysis to investigate their responses to three abiotic stresses (PEG, NaCl, and 40 °C) and three stress-related hormones (ABA, SA, and MeJA). Our results demonstrated that all 26 SsVQ genes were stress-responsive, providing a foundation for understanding the functional mechanisms of VQ proteins in plant stress resistance and offering potential genetic resources for improving stress-tolerant cultivars.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the SsVQ Genes and Analysis of Physicochemical Properties

A total of 39 VQ family members were identified in the S. suchowensis genome. These genes were renamed SsVQ1 to SsVQ39 based on the information of chromosomal localization and sequenced ID (Table 1). Three genes (SsVQ37, SsVQ38, and SsVQ39) were located on unassembled scaffolds, while the remaining 36 SsVQ genes were unevenly distributed across 17 of the 19 chromosomes (Figure 1). Chromosomes chr8 and chr17 lacked VQ genes, whereas chr1 and chr5 contained the highest number of SsVQ genes (five genes each). Physicochemical analysis revealed that SsVQ proteins ranged in length from 105 to 497 amino acids (aa), with 31 (79.49%) being shorter than 300 aa and 8 (20.51%) exceeding this length. Their molecular weights varied between 11,418.14 Da and 53,367.44 Da, with predicted isoelectric points (pI) ranging from 4.08 to 10.43. Subcellular localization predictions (Wolf PSORT) indicated that 29 SsVQ proteins were nuclear, 1 was localized to the plasma membrane, 3 to the chloroplast, 1 to the mitochondrion, and 5 to cytosol (Table 1).

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of VQ Genes

Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the full-length VQ protein sequences of willow, Arabidopsis, rice, and poplar, and a phylogenetic tree (NJ tree) was constructed to analyze the evolutionary relationships of VQ family members (Figure 2). According to the results of phylogenetic analysis, the S. suchowensis VQ family members were divided into seven groups. Notably, the number of VQ members in each group showed limited divergence between S. suchowensis and A. thaliana, with Groups II, IV, and VI containing identical gene counts. Strikingly, the NJ tree demonstrated that 84.6% of S. suchowensis VQ genes (33 SsVQ genes) formed sister pairs with poplar homologs (e.g., SsVQ12-PtVQ14), indicating their origin from common ancestry.

2.3. Duplication Events of VQ Genes

To understand the evolutionary mechanism of the VQ gene family in S. suchowensis, the duplication events of the 36 SsVQ genes were analyzed. According to the results of multi-species collinearity analysis, S. suchowensis VQ gene had collinearity with all the three plants, while it has the least collinearity pairs with rice (20 pairs, accounting for 25.0% of all SsVQ genes), followed by Arabidopsis (40 pairs, accounting for 66.7%), and the most collinearity pairs with poplar (101 pairs, accounting for 100.0%), respectively (Figure 3a). The findings indicated that dicotyledonous plants exhibited a stronger conservation of the VQ gene, and there was a very close genetic relationship between willow and poplar. S. suchowensis intraspecific collinearity analysis revealed 28 collinearity pairs among 27 SsVQ genes (accounting for 75.0%) (Figure 3b). Both intraspecific and interspecific collinear pairs were attributed to whole genome duplication (WGD) or segmental duplication events, indicating that these mechanisms predominantly drove the expansion of the SsVQ gene family.
To evaluate the impact of selective pressure on the expansion of the VQ gene family, we calculated the Ka/Ks ratios of the SsVQ genes for collinearity pairs in four different species. As shown in Table S1, all of the Ka/Ks ratios were found to be less than 1, with a range from 0.10 to 0.62, indicating that willow VQ genes had primarily undergone purifying selection.

2.4. The Structure and Motif Analysis of the SsVQ Genes

In order to gain insights into the structural diversity, we conducted an analysis of the Exon/intron structure of each willow VQ gene. The results revealed that the majority of SsVQ genes did not contain introns, while only SsVQ7, SsVQ17, and SsVQ38 were found to contain one or two introns (Figure 4a). To obtain a better analysis of the structural feature of the 39 SsVQ proteins, the conserved motifs were predicted by the MEME program (Figure 4b). A total of 20 different conserved motifs were identified, and each motif was annotated using the Pfam and SMART websites. The length and conserved amino acid sequences of the 20 motifs are shown in Table S2. The results showed that motif 1 was a VQ motif (PF05678), and motif 2 was an RNA recognition motif (PF00076), both of which had mRNA binding function, while the other motifs had no functional annotation. All SsVQ proteins contained motif 1, while only group IV genes contained motif 2. In addition, SsVQ proteins within the same group were composed of similar motifs, while those in different groups showed more differences in motif composition.
In order to better understand the similarities and differences of SsVQ motifs, multiple sequence alignments were performed (Figure 5). The typical amino acid sequence of the VQ motif is FxxhVQxhTG, where h is a hydrophobic amino acid residue. All VQ motifs of willow, except SsVQ19, were found to be FxxhVQxhTG. However, SsVQ19 contained a hydrophilic (T: Threonine) rather than a hydrophobic amino acid before the VQ amino acids. According to the classification of the last three amino acids (hTG), the 39 SsVQ proteins contained three VQ motif types: FxxxVQxLTG, FxxxVQxFTG, and FxxxVQ/HxVTG. These motifs are distributed as follows: 30 in group I–V, 7 in group VII, and 2 in group VI. The motif types of SsVQs and PtVQs were consistent. However, SsVQ proteins lacked the FxxxVQxLTD/S, FxxxVQxYTG, and FxxxVQxITG motifs in contrast to AtVQs and OsVQs [6,7].

2.5. Identification of Cis-Elements in the Promoters of SsVQ Genes

To analyze the regulatory mechanism of the SsVQ gene expression, the putative cis-acting elements in the 2000 bp DNA sequences upstream of the start codon were identified (Figure 6). In all, the promoter region analysis revealed the presence of 242 phytohormone response elements, 162 stress-related response elements, and 60 growth and development elements.
In the category of hormone-responsive genes, a total of 28 SsVQ genes were identified to be involved in the ABA-signaling pathway, containing a total of 87 ABREs (ABA response elements). Additionally, 22 SsVQs were found to be associated with a MeJA response, encompassing 44 TGACG motifs and 44 CGTCA motifs. Furthermore, there were 18 SsVQs implicated in SA responsiveness, containing a total of 24 TCA elements. Moreover, 32 gibberellin-response elements and 11 auxin-response elements were found in the promoter region.
In the category of abiotic and biotic stresses, 17 SsVQs were found to contain 28 MYB-binding sites involved in drought-inducibility (MBS). Additionally, 14 SsVQs contained 22 cis-acting elements involved in defense and stress responsiveness (TC-rich repeats), while 13 SsVQs contained 18 cis-acting elements involved in low-temperature responsiveness (LTR). Furthermore, the analysis revealed that 34 SsVQs contained a total of 88 anaerobic/anoxic-induced elements (ARE, GC-motif), with only two SsVQs containing WUN motifs.
Promoter analysis revealed that the SsVQ genes may potentially play an active role in hormone response or stress response, or both. Moreover, it was observed that 31 SsVQs contain a total of 60 elements related to plant growth and development.

2.6. Expression Patterns of the SsVQ Genes in Response to Abiotic Stress and Exogenous Hormone

Under adverse conditions, plants can cope with the stress and maintain normal growth and development by regulating the expression levels of some genes. In order to investigate the role of paralogous SsVQ genes in willow stress regulation, we conducted qRT-PCR analysis on 13 paralogous SsVQ gene pairs under stress- and hormone-treated conditions. Though unselected, the remaining 13 genes may still hold unexplored functions worth further investigation through alternative experimental strategies.
To examine the response of SsVQ genes to abiotic stresses, this study employed qRT-PCR to analyze their expression levels under drought, salt, and high-temperature conditions. Overall, most of the SsVQs showed increased expression levels in response to abiotic stress conditions (Figure 7 and Figure S1). When using PEG to simulate drought stress, there were significant changes in the expression levels of 24 SsVQ genes, except for SsVQ25 and SsVQ27. Notably, the expression levels of 88.5% (23/26) of SsVQ genes were significantly upregulated at varying time points. Specifically, at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, the expression levels of SsVQ2 and SsVQ34 were upregulated by 35.46 and 62.29 times, 11.36 and 49.21 times, 13.25 and 99.9 times, and 8.11 and 201.50 times, respectively. On the other hand, 60.9% (14/23) of SsVQ genes (SsVQ6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 29, 31, 32, 34, and 39) peaked at 24 h, with SsVQ7, 9, 16, 17, 23, 29, 31, 32, 34, and 39 being more than 11-fold different. In addition, SsVQ17 was significantly downregulated to 0.14 at 6 h. After NaCl treatment, significant changes were observed in the expression levels of 24 out of 26 SsVQ genes, with the exception of SsVQ5 and SsVQ14. The expression levels of 84.6% (22/26) of SsVQ genes were significantly upregulated at different time points, with SsVQ2 reaching 17.07, 15.94, 12.18, and 3.76 times at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively. Additionally, the SsVQ31 gene was significantly downregulated to 0.12 at 1 h. Under high-temperature stress at 40 °C, the expression levels of 84.6% (22/26) of SsVQ genes changed significantly, except SsVQ10, 25, 27, and 34. Particularly, 73.1% (19/26) of SsVQ genes had significantly upregulated expression levels at various time points. SsVQ17, 29, 31, 32, and 39 were promptly upregulated by more than 10-fold at 1 h, followed by a dramatic decline. Additionally, SsVQ17 and SsVQ33 showed significant downregulation more than 5-fold (<0.2) at 6 h.
Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis of SsVQ gene expression was conducted following treatments with three exogenous phytohormones (ABA, SA, and MeJA), respectively. The results indicated that more SsVQ genes were downregulated under hormone stress than abiotic stress (Figure 7 and Figure S1). Under ABA stress conditions, significant changes in the expression levels of 88.5% (23/26) of SsVQ genes were observed, with the exception of SsVQ5, SsVQ15, and SsVQ23. Further, 39.1% (9/23) of SsVQ genes exhibited a significant decrease at various time points, with six SsVQ genes showing the most pronounced decline at 1 h. In contrast, 65.2% (15/23) of SsVQ genes showed a significant increase, with 14 reaching their peak expression at 12 h or 24 h. After SA treatment, except for SsVQ16, SsVQ22, SsVQ25, and SsVQ34, there were significant changes in the expression levels of 84.6% (22/26) of SsVQ genes. At various time points, the expression levels of 45.5% (10/22) of SsVQ genes exhibited a significant decrease, with seven SsVQ genes showing the most decrease at 1 h. Additionally, 63.6% (14/22) of SsVQ genes demonstrated a significant increase in expression levels. However, all upregulated expression levels were less than 5-fold. Under MeJA treatment, except SsVQ10 and SsVQ29, the expression level of 92.3% (24/26) of SsVQ genes was significantly changed. Further, 61.5% (16/26) of SsVQ genes were downregulated, and the expression levels of SsVQ14 and SsVQ31 were the lowest and downregulated by more than 5-fold at 1 h of treatment. Among them, the expression levels of SsVQ7, SsVQ8, SsVQ23, and SsVQ39 were the lowest and downregulated by more than 5-fold after treatment for 24 h. In contrast, 50% (12/24) of SsVQ genes demonstrated a significant increase, with eight reaching their peak expression at 12 h. In addition, the expression levels of SsVQ34 were significantly upregulated in all treatment periods, and the upregulation multiples ranged from 16.35 to 63.50. In particular, SsVQ12 was significantly upregulated under all treatments, with peak values of 4.96 under PEG, 8.34 under NaCl, 12.08 under 40 °C, 7.42 under ABA, 4.61 under SA, and 12.80 under MeJA.

2.7. Co-Expression Networks of the SsVQ Genes

The expression patterns of SsVQ genes showed various changes under abiotic stresses and hormonal treatments. In order to visualize the correlation between the changes of SsVQ gene expression, we drew co-expression networks based on Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) between expression patterns. As illustrated in Figure 8, the number of SsVQ gene co-expressions was highest under PEG treatment, and all of them exhibited positive correlations. In contrast, the co-expression relationships of SsVQ genes varied under other treatments, with most showing a positive correlation and a few showing a negative correlation. The order of co-expression numbers from highest to lowest was PEG > 40 °C > NaCl > SA > ABA > MeJA. Additionally, the homologous pair SsVQ7 and SsVQ17 showed a consistent positive correlation across all treatments.

3. Discussion

VQ proteins are non-plant-specific proteins, but they are also present in some fungi, lower animals, and bacteria [35]. Previous studies have highlighted the significant role of VQ proteins in various aspects of plant biology, including growth, development, and stress responses [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. While our knowledge of the VQ genes in S. suchowensis is limited, further research is necessary to fully understand their functions in this particular species. Therefore, we utilized bioinformatic methods to perform a genome-wide analysis of VQ genes in S. suchowensis and investigate their expression patterns under various stresses and hormone treatments.
This study identified 39 SsVQ proteins in S. suchowensis, all of which contain a conserved FxxxVQxxTG motif. In comparison, P. trichocarpa, another member of the Salicaceae family, contains 51 PtVQ proteins. These findings confirm that poplar retained more “Salicoid” duplicates than willow after their divergence [2]. The uneven distribution of 39 SsVQ genes on 17 of the 19 chromosomes, except for chromosomes 8 and 17, is consistent with the distribution pattern observed in poplar. Subcellular localization prediction showed that 29 SsVQ proteins were located in the nucleus, while 10 SsVQ proteins were predicted to be located in the chloroplast, mitochondrion, plasma membrane, or cytosol, indicating that members of the SsVQ protein family may play roles in different locations.
A total of 39 SsVQ genes were divided into seven groups based on a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis conducted among A. thaliana, P. trichocarpa, S. suchowensis, and O. sativa. The phylogenetic tree analysis revealed that SsVQs and PtVQs consistently clustered together, likely due to their shared classification within the Salicaceae family. Genes that were closely related within the same group exhibited similar gene structures, characterized by comparable intron numbers and exon lengths. In this study, 92.31% of SsVQ genes (36/39) were intronless, providing further evidence that most VQ genes in higher plants are intronless [14]. Some researchers propose that the introns of the VQ gene have evolved independently in recent history [36], whereas others contend that these introns were gradually lost throughout evolution as a result of varying selective pressures [15,37,38]. Most SsVQ proteins (79.49%) comprised less than 300 amino acids, which is similar to the study in Arabidopsis, rice, poplar, maize, coix, tobacco, and Brassica juncea [11,12,13,15,36,37,38].
Within each group, both exon/intron structures and motif compositions exhibited a high degree of conservation. The primary VQ motif identified in group VI across willow, Arabidopsis, rice, and poplar is FxxxVQxVTG, while FxxxVQxFTG is predominantly observed in group VII. These variations in conserved amino acid sequences may contribute to functional differentiation among the groups. Multiple sequence comparisons revealed that all VQ motif amino acid sequences in willow are characterized by the pattern FxxhVQxhTG, with the exception of SsVQ19. SsVQ19 found in willow and PtVQ27 found in poplar are Orthologous genes. Notably, SsVQ19 showed a similarity to PtVQ27 with a hydrophilic amino acid residue (threonine, T) preceding the VQ amino acid residue. Furthermore, no such conserved motif variation was observed in Arabidopsis thaliana or rice [11,12].
The analysis of upstream promoter sequences for SsVQ genes revealed the presence of several cis-acting elements associated with stresses and hormone responses. Therefore, the expression levels of SsVQs under PEG, NaCl, 40 °C, ABA, SA, and MeJA treatments were further analyzed. The results indicated that the majority of the tested SsVQ genes were significantly upregulated by PEG, exhibiting high expression levels. Furthermore, these SsVQ genes contain several cis elements associated with osmotic stress or drought response. The fold change in expression was most pronounced for SsVQ34, suggesting that it warrants further attention in the investigation of drought resistance in willow. SsVQ2 was consistently and significantly upregulated at a high level under both PEG and NaCl treatments. Additionally, AtVQ15 has been confirmed to play a role in the response to high salt and osmotic stresses [11,39]. Both proteins belong to group VI are likely functionally similar. StVQ31 is phylogenetically close to AtVQ15 and significantly impacts osmotic and antioxidant cellular homeostasis, thereby enhancing salt tolerance [40]. Therefore, we speculate that SsVQ2 may be involved in the response of willow to salt and osmotic stresses. The expression of SsVQ12 and SsVQ34 showed significant upregulation during all periods of MeJA treatment, and MeJA-responsive cis-acting elements were identified in their promoters. These genes are orthologous to AtVQ4 and AtVQ16, respectively. We hypothesize that SsVQ12 and SsVQ34 are involved in the jasmonic acid (JA) pathway to positively regulate disease resistance in willow, as the Arabidopsis genes AtVQ4 and AtVQ16 have been shown to influence resistance to pathogen infection [11,41,42,43]. In addition, SsVQ9 and SsVQ12 exhibited significant upregulation at 40 °C, indicating their potential involvement in the response to high-temperature stress. Conversely, SsVQ32 and SsVQ23 demonstrated significant downregulation under ABA and SA treatments, respectively, suggesting that they may be involved in the corresponding signaling pathways.
Previous studies in Arabidopsis have demonstrated that phylogenetically closely related VQ genes, especially paralogous genes, often exhibit similar functions [19,20,43,44]. For instance, VQ12 and VQ29 negatively regulate plant basal resistance against Botrytis cinerea, while VQ16 and VQ23 serve as activators of WRKY33 in the plant’s defense response to necrotrophic pathogens [20,43]. Additionally, VQ18 and VQ26 act antagonistically with ABI5 to maintain appropriate levels of ABA signaling, thereby fine-tuning seed germination and early seedling establishment [19]. Consequently, we selected 13 pairs of paralogous genes from seven groups for expression level determination and correlation analysis of their expression patterns. Under six different treatments, the co-expression ratio of paralogous gene pairs is obviously higher than that of non-paralogous gene pairs (Table 2). In Arabidopsis, VQ12 and VQ29 were shown to form both homodimers and heterodimers through yeast two-hybrid and BiFC assays [20]. Furthermore, Yeast two-hybrid assays confirmed mutual interactions among Coix VQ proteins (ClVQ12, ClVQ4, and ClVQ26) [15]. Therefore, the co-expression observed in this study may be attributed to protein–protein interactions. Additionally, several paralogous pairs exhibited co-expression under various treatments. Notably, SsVQ7 and SsVQ17 demonstrated a consistent positive correlation across all treatment conditions; the reason for this phenomenon needs further experimental verification.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification and Analysis of the SsVQ Genes

The protein sequences of the VQ family members of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa were downloaded from the Phytozome v13 database (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/ (accessed on 20 March 2025)) based on relevant literature reports [11,12,13]. The complete genome protein sequence of S. suchowensis was obtained from URL (https://figshare.com/articles/Willow_gene_family/9878582/1 (accessed on 20 March 2025)) [45]. Local BLASTP retrieval (E-value < 0.01) was performed to obtain candidate sequences with AtVQ protein as the seed sequence. Candidate sequences were screened by using the MEME Suite 5.5.7 online program (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme-chip (accessed on 20 March 2025)), sequences without VQ domains were removed, and VQ members of S. suchowensis are named based on their chromosomal information and Sequence ID. The SsVQ genes were mapped onto the chromosomes based on the physical location information. Additionally, the length of sequences, isoelectric points, and molecular weights (kDa) of the VQ genes were calculated by the ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ (accessed on 20 March 2025)). The protein subcellular localization was predicted by the WoLF PSORT program (http://www.genscript.com/psort/wolf_psort.html (accessed on 20 March 2025)).

4.2. Multiple Alignment and Phylogenetic Tree Construction of the SsVQs

A multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalX 2.1 to investigate the evolutionary relationships and classification of the SsVQs. The alignment results of VQ protein sequences from four plant species were selected to construct phylogenetic tree, employing 2000 bootstrap replicates through the neighbor-joining (NJ) method implemented in MEGA12 (https://www.megasoftware.net/ (accessed 20 March 2025)). Modifications to the phylogenetic tree were made using Adobe Photoshop.

4.3. Collinearity Analysis of the SsVQ Genes

The 36 SsVQ genes, except for SsVQ37, SsVQ38, and SsVQ39, were used for collinearity analysis. Blastn was performed to compare the VQ genes of S. suchowensis, A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa for four genomic datasets to localize their distribution in chromosomes. Collinearity analysis was conducted using the MCScanX v1.1.11, and the results were visualized using TBtools-II v2.119 [46,47].

4.4. Conserved Motifs and Structure Analysis of the SsVQs

Conserved motifs of the SsVQ proteins were analyzed using the MEME website (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme-chip (accessed on 20 March 2025)), with parameter settings of 20 motifs and a motif length range of 8–50. The 39 SsVQ gene sequences were uploaded to the Gene Structure Display Server website (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/ (accessed on 20 March 2025)) to analyze the gene structures, including introns, exons, and upstream/downstream untranslated sequences.

4.5. Identification of Cis-Elements in the Promoters of SsVQ Genes

The upstream 2000 bp DNA sequences of the SsVQ genes preceding the start codons were extracted as the promoter sequences. The distribution of cis elements was determined by submitting the promoter regions to PLANTCARE webtool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ (accessed on 20 March 2025)). The cis-element analysis mainly refers to binding sites for the three classes of hormone response elements, stress-related response elements, and growth/development elements. The results were visualized using TBtools software v2.082.

4.6. Plant Materials, Growth Conditions, and Stress Treatments

The experiment utilized 6-week-old S. suchowensis seedlings in plant climate incubator under controlled conditions: 16 h light/8 h dark photo period and 25 °C day/22 °C night. Seedlings were placed in brown wide-mouth bottles and cultured with Hoagland nutrient solution, which was replaced every 7 days. To investigate the expression profiles of SsVQ genes under various stresses, seedlings were subjected to different treatments, including 200 mM of NaCl, 20% (w/v) PEG (polyethylene glycol 6000), 40 °C, 0.5 mmol·L−1 SA (salicylic acid), 0.1 mmol·L−1 MeJA (methyl jasmonate), and 0.1 mmol·L−1 ABA (abscisic acid). Leaves were taken at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after each treatment and then rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 80 °C for subsequent analysis.

4.7. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA from the leaves was extracted using the Aidlab plant RNA kit (Aidlab Biotech, Beijing, China). Synthesizing cDNA used the UnionScript First-strand cDNA Synthesis Mix (Gensand, Beijing, China). The OTU (OTU-like cysteine protease family protein) gene was utilized as the internal reference for salt stress, while UBC (Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2) was used for the other five treatments [48,49].
We identified 13 paralog pairs (26 genes) with sequences aligned over >300 bp and showing at least 40% identity, following the methodology by Blanc and Wolfe [50]. Subsequently, we performed qRT-PCR analysis on these 13 paralogous pairs. Primer 5 was used to design specific primers (listed in Table S3). Q-PCR was performed on CFX96TM RealTime System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus; TaKaRa Biotechnology) in a 10 μL reaction volume with three biological and three technical replicates. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate the relative expression level of each gene in this study [51]. The mean values and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated from three biological and three technical replicates. The expression data obtained from the qRT-PCR analysis were visualized as heat maps using TBtools-II v2.119.

4.8. Co-Expression Network Analysis

To further investigate the interaction characteristics between the expression of SsVQ genes within six treatments, Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) and p-values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 software. Subsequently, gene co-expression networks were constructed using Cytoscape_v3.10.0 software [52], with PCC absolute values greater than or equal to 0.8 and p-values at the 0.05 significance level.

5. Conclusions

This study provides the first comprehensive characterization of the VQ gene family in S. suchowensis, revealing 39 SsVQ genes phylogenetically clustered into seven distinct groups. Evolutionary analyses indicated that whole genome duplication (WGD) and segmental duplication events drove SsVQ family expansion, with purifying selection playing a dominant role in their evolution. Structural conservation, including intronless architecture and conserved VQ motifs, further underscored the evolutionary stability of these genes. Notably, SsVQ19 displayed a unique hydrophilic threonine residue adjacent to the VQ amino acid residues, reflecting a characteristic observed in its homolog PtVQ27. Expression profiling under abiotic stresses (PEG, NaCl, 40 °C) and hormonal treatments (ABA, SA, MeJA) highlighted the dynamic and context-specific roles of SsVQ genes, with SsVQ2, SsVQ9, SsVQ12, SsVQ23, SsVQ32, and SsVQ34 emerging as key candidates in stresses and hormonal-signaling pathways. Co-expression patterns among SsVQ genes suggested synergistic regulatory mechanisms. These findings not only enhance our understanding of the structural and functional diversification of VQ cofactors in willow but also lay a foundation for future functional studies aimed at leveraging SsVQ genes to improve stress resilience and productivity in woody plants through genetic engineering. Further validation of candidate genes and exploration of their molecular interactions will deepen insights into their roles in plant-environment crosstalk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14101431/s1, Figure S1: Expression analysis of SsVQ genes under six treatments by qRT-PCR; Table S1: Ka/Ks ratios of collinearity gene pairs; Table S2: Detailed information for the 20 motifs in the SsVQ proteins of Salix suchowensis; Table S3: List of primer sequences used for qRT-PCR analysis of the SsVQ genes from Salix suchowensis.

Author Contributions

Participated in the design of this study, B.J., C.Y., H.W. and Y.W. (Yujiao Wang); Conceived and designed the experiments, B.J., J.Z., H.W. and Y.W. (Yujiao Wang); Performed the experiments: H.W., C.Y. and Y.W. (Yujiao Wang); Analyzed the data: H.W., Y.W. (Yujiao Wang), Y.W. (Yongle Wang), L.C. and X.Y.; Wrote the manuscript: H.W.; Revised manuscript: H.W., Y.W. (Yujiao Wang), C.Y. and B.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the research on key technology of standardized production and industrialization of willow along Huaihe (grant number 202003b06020026), and development and industrialization of Funan wicker high value new products (grant number 202103b06020003), study on breeding of new morchella varieties and molecular mechanism of high-temperature resistance (grant number 2025YL032).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Jia, H.X.; Li, J.B.; Huang, J.; Lu, M.Z.; Hu, J.J. The heat shock factor gene family in Salix suchowensis: A genome-wide survey and expression profiling during development and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dai, X.; Hu, Q.; Cai, Q.; Feng, K.; Ye, N.; Tuskan, G.A.; Milne, R.; Chen, Y.; Wan, Z.; Wang, Z.; et al. The willow genome and divergent evolution from poplar after the common genome duplication. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 1274–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wei, S.; Ye, N.; Yin, T. Detecting the Candidate Gender Determinants by Bioinformatic Prediction of miRNAs and Their Targets from Transcriptome Sequences of the Male and Female Flowers in Salix suchowensis. Biomed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9614596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wei, S.; Chen, Y.; Hou, J.; Yang, Y.; Yin, T. Aux/IAA and ARF Gene Families in Salix suchowensis: Identification, Evolution, and Dynamic Transcriptome Profiling During the Plant Growth Process. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 666310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ren, Y.; He, Z.; Liu, P.; Traw, B.; Sun, S.; Tian, D.; Yang, S.; Jia, Y.; Wang, L. Somatic Mutation Analysis in Salix suchowensis Reveals Early-Segregated Cell Lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5292–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, P.; Guo, J.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome and development of molecular markers of Salix. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, L.; Liao, S.; Applequist, W.; Chen, S. The valid publication of Salix suchowensis (Salicaceae). PhytoKeys 2019, 131, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chi, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, J.; Fan, B.; Yu, J.Q.; Chen, Z. Protein-protein interactions in the regulation of WRKY transcription factors. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, K.; Wang, P. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the VQ gene family in Cucurbita pepo L. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, J.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Yu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W. Identification, characterization and expression analysis of the VQ motif-containing gene family in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chi, Y.J.; Zhou, J.; Chen, J.Y.; Wang, F.; Fan, B.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.H.; et al. Structural and functional analysis of VQ motif-containing proteins in Arabidopsis as interacting proteins of WRKY transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 810–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, D.Y.; Kwon, S.I.; Choi, C.; Lee, H.; Ahn, I.; Park, S.R.; Bae, S.C.; Lee, S.C.; Hwang, D.J. Expression analysis of rice VQ genes in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Gene 2013, 529, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chu, W.; Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Pan, F.; Chen, Z.; Yan, H.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide analysis of poplar VQ gene family and expression profiling under PEG, NaCl, and SA treatments. Tree Genet. Genomes 2016, 12, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jing, Y.; Lin, R. The VQ Motif-Containing Protein Family of Plant-Specific Transcriptional Regulators. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.; Lu, X.; Fu, Y.; Wang, H.; Yu, C.; Chu, J.; Jiang, B.; Zhu, J. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of VQ gene family under abiotic stress in Coix lacryma-jobi L. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yuan, G.; Qian, Y.; Ren, Y.; Guan, Y.; Wu, X.; Ge, C.; Ding, H. The role of plant-specific VQ motif-containing proteins: An ever-thickening plot. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, Y.; Jing, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, G.; Lin, R. Arabidopsis VQ MOTIF-CONTAINING PROTEIN29 represses seedling deetiolation by interacting with PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR1. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 2068–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, M.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Yang, M.; Guo, L.; Han, X.; Ma, X.; Huang, Z.; Gao, Q. Genome-wide identification of the valine-glutamine motif containing gene family and the role of VQ25-1 in pollen germination in Brassica oleracea. Genes Genom. 2023, 45, 921–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pan, J.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis VQ18 and VQ26 proteins interact with ABI5 transcription factor to negatively modulate ABA response during seed germination. Plant J. 2018, 95, 529–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Pan, J.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis VQ motif-containing proteins VQ12 and VQ29 negatively modulate basal defense against Botrytis cinerea. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Xiong, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Song, Y.; Zhang, X.; Min, D. The wheat VQ motif-containing protein TaVQ4-D positively regulates drought tolerance in transgenic plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 5591–5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, R.; Gao, Y.; Yan, H.; Xiang, Y. A Moso bamboo gene VQ28 confers salt tolerance to transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Planta 2020, 251, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Pan, J.; Hu, Y.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis VQ10 interacts with WRKY8 to modulate basal defense against Botrytis cinerea. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 956–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lei, R.; Li, X.; Ma, Z.; Lv, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis WRKY2 and WRKY34 transcription factors interact with VQ20 protein to modulate pollen development and function. Plant J. 2017, 91, 962–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Ji, Y.; Jing, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, H.; Yu, D.; Chen, L. Arabidopsis SIGMA FACTOR BINDING PROTEIN1 (SIB1) and SIB2 inhibit WRKY75 function in abscisic acid-mediated leaf senescence and seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 182–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hao, Z.; Tian, J.; Fang, H.; Fang, L.; Xu, X.; He, F.; Li, S.; Xie, W.; Du, Q.; You, X.; et al. A VQ-motif-containing protein fine-tunes rice immunity and growth by a hierarchical regulatory mechanism. Cell Rep. 2022, 40, 111235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, X.; Lu, M.; Xia, Z.; Li, H.; Liu, D.; Li, K.; Yin, P.; Wang, G.; Zhou, C. Wheat VQ Motif-Containing Protein VQ25-A Facilitates Leaf Senescence via the Abscisic Acid Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, X.W.; Xu, R.R.; Liu, Y.; You, C.X.; An, J.P. MdVQ10 promotes wound-triggered leaf senescence in association with MdWRKY75 and undergoes antagonistic modulation of MdCML15 and MdJAZs in apple. Plant J. 2023, 115, 1599–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Z.; Gao, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Su, H.; Cao, M.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, B.; Guo, Y.D.; et al. The transcription factor SlWRKY37 positively regulates jasmonic acid- and dark-induced leaf senescence in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 6207–6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gayubas, B.; Castillo, M.C.; Ramos, S.; Leon, J. Enhanced meristem development, tolerance to oxidative stress and hyposensitivity to nitric oxide in the hypermorphic vq10-H mutant in AtVQ10 gene. Plant Cell Environ. 2023, 46, 3445–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jia, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Sun, P.; Zhang, Y.; Xin, X.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of a desert willow, Salix psammophila, reveals the function of hub genes SpMDP1 and SpWRKY33 in drought tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, N.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S. Comprehensive analysis of VQ motif-containing gene expression in rice defense responses to three pathogens. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 1493–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, M.; Vannozzi, A.; Wang, G.; Zhong, Y.; Corso, M.; Cavallini, E.; Cheng, Z.M. A comprehensive survey of the grapevine VQ gene family and its transcriptional correlation with WRKY proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhu, D.; Gao, Y.; Yan, H.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide analysis of VQ motif-containing proteins in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Planta 2017, 246, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiang, S.Y.; Sevugan, M.; Ramachandran, S. Valine-glutamine (VQ) motif coding genes are ancient and non-plant-specific with comprehensive expression regulation by various biotic and abiotic stresses. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, W.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, X.; Lei, L.; Lai, J. Genome-Wide Identification of VQ Motif-Containing Proteins and their Expression Profiles Under Abiotic Stresses in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yan, X.; Luo, R.; Liu, X.; Hou, Z.; Pei, W.; Zhu, W.; Cui, H. Characterization and the comprehensive expression analysis of tobacco valine-glutamine genes in response to trichomes development and stress tolerance. Bot. Stud. 2023, 64, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, J.; Li, H.; Guo, Z.; Zhuang, X.; Huang, W.; Mao, C.; Feng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhou, Y. Comprehensive Identification and Expression Profiling of the VQ Motif-Containing Gene Family in Brassica juncea. Biology 2022, 11, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Perruc, E.; Charpenteau, M.; Ramirez, B.C.; Jauneau, A.; Galaud, J.P.; Ranjeva, R.; Ranty, B. A novel calmodulin-binding protein functions as a negative regulator of osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant J. 2004, 38, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhai, M.; Ao, Z.; Qu, H.; Guo, D. Overexpression of the potato VQ31 enhances salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1347861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weyhe, M.; Eschen-Lippold, L.; Pecher, P.; Scheel, D.; Lee, J. Menage a trois: The complex relationships between mitogen-activated protein kinases, WRKY transcription factors, and VQ-motif-containing proteins. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e29519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pecher, P.; Eschen-Lippold, L.; Herklotz, S.; Kuhle, K.; Naumann, K.; Bethke, G.; Uhrig, J.; Weyhe, M.; Scheel, D.; Lee, J. The Arabidopsis thaliana mitogen-activated protein kinases MPK3 and MPK6 target a subclass of V‘Q-motif’-containing proteins to regulate immune responses. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 592–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lai, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Cheng, Y.; Fan, B.; Yu, J.Q.; Chen, Z. Arabidopsis sigma factor binding proteins are activators of the WRKY33 transcription factor in plant defense. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3824–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cai, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; He, Q.; Chai, M.; Liu, L.; Chen, F.; Huang, Y.; Yan, M.; Zhao, H.; et al. Genome-Wide Classification and Evolutionary and Functional Analyses of the VQ Family. Trop. Plant Biol. 2019, 12, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qu, Y.; Bi, C.; He, B.; Ye, N.; Yin, T.; Xu, L.A. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the MADS-box gene family in Salix suchowensis. PeerJ 2019, 7, e8019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Chen, H.; He, Y.; et al. TBtools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, J.; Jia, H.; Han, X.; Zhang, J.; Sun, P.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Selection of Reliable Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis under Abiotic Stresses in the Desert Biomass Willow, Salix psammophila. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Jia, H.; Yue, Z.; Lu, M.; Xin, X.; Hu, J. Genome-Wide Characterization of the sHsp Gene Family in Salix suchowensis Reveals Its Functions under Different Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Blanc, G.; Wolfe, K.H. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1667–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Gorodkin, J.; Jensen, L.J. Cytoscape StringApp: Network Analysis and Visualization of Proteomics Data. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chromosomal location of VQ genes in S. suchowensis.
Figure 1. Chromosomal location of VQ genes in S. suchowensis.
Plants 14 01431 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of VQ genes from S. suchowensis, Arabidopsis, poplar, and rice. Willow, Arabidopsis, poplar, and rice are denoted by red, blue, green, and yellow shapes, respectively. Numbers I–VII indicate different groups, and the different colors in the outermost circle represent different groups.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of VQ genes from S. suchowensis, Arabidopsis, poplar, and rice. Willow, Arabidopsis, poplar, and rice are denoted by red, blue, green, and yellow shapes, respectively. Numbers I–VII indicate different groups, and the different colors in the outermost circle represent different groups.
Plants 14 01431 g002
Figure 3. Collinearity analysis. (a) VQ gene collinearity between willow and other species. (b) Collinearity analysis of VQ gene in S. suchowensis.
Figure 3. Collinearity analysis. (a) VQ gene collinearity between willow and other species. (b) Collinearity analysis of VQ gene in S. suchowensis.
Plants 14 01431 g003
Figure 4. The structures and motifs of the SsVQ genes in S. suchowensis. Numbers I–VII indicate different groups. (a) The gene structures of the VQ gene family are shown. (b) Protein motifs in SsVQ members are represented by colorful boxes, each denoting a distinct motif.
Figure 4. The structures and motifs of the SsVQ genes in S. suchowensis. Numbers I–VII indicate different groups. (a) The gene structures of the VQ gene family are shown. (b) Protein motifs in SsVQ members are represented by colorful boxes, each denoting a distinct motif.
Plants 14 01431 g004
Figure 5. Multiple sequence alignment of the VQ domain of 39 SsVQs, with conserved amino acids shaded in different colors. The color shaded areas indicate several conserved residues.
Figure 5. Multiple sequence alignment of the VQ domain of 39 SsVQs, with conserved amino acids shaded in different colors. The color shaded areas indicate several conserved residues.
Plants 14 01431 g005
Figure 6. Cis-acting element analysis of the SsVQ gene family. Numbers I–VII indicate different groups, numerals 1–10 denote the count of cis-elements, and color gradients reflect quantitative variations. (a) Number of each cis element upstream of each SsVQ gene. (b) The total number of statistics of cis elements and SsVQs.
Figure 6. Cis-acting element analysis of the SsVQ gene family. Numbers I–VII indicate different groups, numerals 1–10 denote the count of cis-elements, and color gradients reflect quantitative variations. (a) Number of each cis element upstream of each SsVQ gene. (b) The total number of statistics of cis elements and SsVQs.
Plants 14 01431 g006
Figure 7. Heat map showing 26 SsVQ gene-expression profiles under 3 abiotic stresses and 3 phytohormones based on qRT-PCR. The color scale represented relative expression levels, with red and blue indicating increased or decreased transcript abundance, respectively.
Figure 7. Heat map showing 26 SsVQ gene-expression profiles under 3 abiotic stresses and 3 phytohormones based on qRT-PCR. The color scale represented relative expression levels, with red and blue indicating increased or decreased transcript abundance, respectively.
Plants 14 01431 g007
Figure 8. Correlation analysis of SsVQ gene family based on the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) of relative expression data between gene pairs. Panels (af) represent the co-expression networks of SsVQ genes under PEG, NaCl, 40 °C, ABA, SA, and MeJA treatments. Red or blue lines are drawn to indicate a PCC ≥ 0.8 or ≤−0.8, with p-value ≤ 0.05.
Figure 8. Correlation analysis of SsVQ gene family based on the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) of relative expression data between gene pairs. Panels (af) represent the co-expression networks of SsVQ genes under PEG, NaCl, 40 °C, ABA, SA, and MeJA treatments. Red or blue lines are drawn to indicate a PCC ≥ 0.8 or ≤−0.8, with p-value ≤ 0.05.
Plants 14 01431 g008
Table 1. List of 39 VQ genes identified in S. suchowensis and their sequence characteristics.
Table 1. List of 39 VQ genes identified in S. suchowensis and their sequence characteristics.
NameSequenced ID Protein Length (aa)Molecular Weight (Da)CDS Length (bp)ExonspIChromosome LocationSubcellular
Location
SsVQ1willow_GLEAN_1000357712814,077.7138714.4chr1:1956562/1956948Chloroplast
SsVQ2willow_GLEAN_1000699525220,306.2975918.99chr1:1542044/1542802Nucleus
SsVQ3willow_GLEAN_1001034217119,237.0651618.37chr1:2484352/2484867Nucleus
SsVQ4willow_GLEAN_1001704111112,047.633614.82chr1:21350745/21351080Nucleus
SsVQ5willow_GLEAN_1001754523325,421.4370219.61chr1:22790432/22791133Nucleus
SsVQ6willow_GLEAN_1002091942045,266.98126317.06chr2:6303101/6304363Nucleus
SsVQ7willow_GLEAN_1002220027530,337.2182829.46chr2:3767449/3771058Nucleus
SsVQ8willow_GLEAN_1001349713815,010.8441715.76chr3:11005186/11005602Nucleus
SsVQ9willow_GLEAN_1002213420922,699.9463016.28chr3:4156214/4156843Plasma membrane
SsVQ10willow_GLEAN_1002573232034,874.73963110.43chr3:5293007/5293969Mitochondrion
SsVQ11willow_GLEAN_1000271117919,597.2354019.48chr4:7211068/7211607Chloroplast
SsVQ12willow_GLEAN_1001737127229,498.8381919.32chr4:1785239/1786057Nucleus
SsVQ13willow_GLEAN_1000503030833,697.03927110.4chr5:7911241/7912167Cytosol
SsVQ14willow_GLEAN_1000677247451,061.87142517.33chr5:2808863/2810287Nucleus
SsVQ15willow_GLEAN_1000830120922,596.763016.18chr5:1833356/1833985Nucleus
SsVQ16willow_GLEAN_1001208244747,594134416.15chr5:8238824/8240167Nucleus
SsVQ17willow_GLEAN_1001591633937,735.18102039.65chr5:10092888/10098786Nucleus
SsVQ18willow_GLEAN_1002592217619,198.0553119.05chr6:11654744/11655274Nucleus
SsVQ19willow_GLEAN_1002597610511,418.1431819.84chr6:12133882/12134199Nucleus
SsVQ20willow_GLEAN_1002706513414,522.8940514.08chr6:1548291/1548695Nucleus
SsVQ21willow_GLEAN_1002723925226,918.6875919.85chr6:293114/293872Nucleus
SsVQ22willow_GLEAN_1000705649753,367.44149416.55chr7:5496219/5497712Nucleus
SsVQ23willow_GLEAN_1001259818520,306.2955818.99chr7:315837/316394Cytosol
SsVQ24willow_GLEAN_1001398720422,118.261516.51chr7:6606481/6607095Cytosol
SsVQ25willow_GLEAN_1002284016118,067.648617.71chr9:2426972/2427457Nucleus
SsVQ26willow_GLEAN_1002130722524,179.167819.44chr10:7351516/7352193Nucleus
SsVQ27willow_GLEAN_1000747223625,617.5771119.77chr11:7876010/7876720Nucleus
SsVQ28willow_GLEAN_1001086327129,235.681619.74chr11:2409757/2410572Nucleus
SsVQ29willow_GLEAN_1001982718220,184.9554919.44chr12:2379475/2380023Nucleus
SsVQ30willow_GLEAN_1001216913114,800.5639615.25chr13:2567846/2568241Chloroplast
SsVQ31willow_GLEAN_1000894616518,484.4149819.01chr14:171647/172144Nucleus
SsVQ32willow_GLEAN_1000284718620,439.0556117.68chr15:4289624/4290184Nucleus
SsVQ33willow_GLEAN_1001787322223,897.1266914.74chr16:9603289/9603957Cytosol
SsVQ34willow_GLEAN_1002326513414,840.4940515.94chr16:1384684/1385088Cytosol
SsVQ35willow_GLEAN_1000684517819,382.7153717.8chr18:380560/381096Nucleus
SsVQ36willow_GLEAN_1000423711312,580.1634215.14chr19:584761/585102Nucleus
SsVQ37willow_GLEAN_1000177325627,397.377115.93scaffold01123:3188/3958Nucleus
SsVQ38willow_GLEAN_1000160131434,011.01945210.39scaffold01654:1195/2291Nucleus
SsVQ39willow_GLEAN_1000140316317,683.2149219.17scaffold02338:2728/3219Nucleus
Table 2. Co-expression ratio statistics.
Table 2. Co-expression ratio statistics.
TreatmentsThe Co-Expressed Number of N aThe Co-Expressed Ratio of N aThe Co-Expressed Number of P bThe Co-Expressed Ratio of P b Co-Expressed Paralogous Pairs
PEG8226.28753.85SsVQ2-SsVQ37; SsVQ6-SsVQ16; SsVQ7-SsVQ17; SsVQ8-SsVQ34; SsVQ10-SsVQ38; SsVQ23-SsVQ31; SsVQ29-SsVQ32;
NaCl5517.63538.46SsVQ2-SsVQ37; SsVQ7-SsVQ17; SsVQ12-SsVQ28; SsVQ23-SsVQ31; SsVQ29-SsVQ32;
40 °C5617.95753.85SsVQ2-SsVQ37; SsVQ5-SsVQ27; SsVQ7-SsVQ17; SsVQ9-SsVQ33; SsVQ12-SsVQ28; SsVQ23-SsVQ31; SsVQ29-SsVQ32;
ABA3511.22430.77SsVQ7-SsVQ17; SsVQ12-SsVQ28; SsVQ25-SsVQ39; SsVQ29-SsVQ32;
SA4113.14430.77SsVQ2-SsVQ37; SsVQ7-SsVQ17; SsVQ9-SsVQ33; SsVQ12-SsVQ28;
MeJA3210.26430.77SsVQ7-SsVQ17; SsVQ9-SsVQ33; SsVQ10-SsVQ38; SsVQ23-SsVQ31;
N a means non-paralogous gene pairs; P b means paralogue pairs; The number of gene pairs = 26 × (26−1)/2 = 325.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Chen, L.; Yan, X.; Yu, C.; Jiang, B. Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of VQ Gene Family in Salix suchowensis Under Abiotic Stresses and Hormone Treatments. Plants 2025, 14, 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101431

AMA Style

Wang H, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhu J, Chen L, Yan X, Yu C, Jiang B. Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of VQ Gene Family in Salix suchowensis Under Abiotic Stresses and Hormone Treatments. Plants. 2025; 14(10):1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Hongjuan, Yujiao Wang, Yongle Wang, Jiabao Zhu, Lei Chen, Xiaoming Yan, Chun Yu, and Benli Jiang. 2025. "Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of VQ Gene Family in Salix suchowensis Under Abiotic Stresses and Hormone Treatments" Plants 14, no. 10: 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101431

APA Style

Wang, H., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Chen, L., Yan, X., Yu, C., & Jiang, B. (2025). Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of VQ Gene Family in Salix suchowensis Under Abiotic Stresses and Hormone Treatments. Plants, 14(10), 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101431

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop