Next Article in Journal
Long-Lasting Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized with Tagetes erecta and Their Antibacterial Activity against Erwinia amylovora, a Serious Rosaceous Pathogen
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Nitrogen and Flooding Intensity Determine the Trade-Off between Leaf and Root Traits of Riparian Plant Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arthrocnemum Moq.: Unlocking Opportunities for Biosaline Agriculture and Improved Human Nutrition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Temporal Changes in Biochemical Responses to Salt Stress in Three Salicornia Species

1
Department of Plant Production and Genetics, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71946-84471, Iran
2
Institute of Biotechnology, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71468-64685, Iran
3
Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity (COMAV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(7), 979; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070979
Submission received: 29 February 2024 / Revised: 23 March 2024 / Accepted: 27 March 2024 / Published: 29 March 2024

Abstract

:
Halophytes adapt to salinity using different biochemical response mechanisms. Temporal measurements of biochemical parameters over a period of exposure to salinity may clarify the patterns and kinetics of stress responses in halophytes. This study aimed to evaluate short-term temporal changes in shoot biomass and several biochemical variables, including the contents of photosynthetic pigments, ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+), osmolytes (proline and glycine betaine), oxidative stress markers (H2O2 and malondialdehyde), and antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase) activities of three halophytic Salicornia species (S. persica, S. europaea, and S. bigelovii) in response to non-saline, moderate (300 mM NaCl), and high (500 mM NaCl) salinity treatments at three sampling times. Salicornia plants showed maximum shoot biomass under moderate salinity conditions. The results indicated that high Na+ accumulation in the shoots, coupled with the relative retention of K+ and Ca2+ under salt stress conditions, contributed significantly to ionic and osmotic balance and salinity tolerance in the tested Salicornia species. Glycine betaine accumulation, both constitutive and salt-induced, also seems to play a crucial role in osmotic adjustment in Salicornia plants subjected to salinity treatments. Salicornia species possess an efficient antioxidant enzyme system that largely relies on the ascorbate peroxidase and peroxidase activities to partly counteract salt-induced oxidative stress. The results also revealed that S. persica exhibited higher salinity tolerance than S. europaea and S. bigelovii, as shown by better plant growth under moderate and high salinity. This higher tolerance was associated with higher peroxidase activities and increased glycine betaine and proline accumulation in S. persica. Taking all the data together, this study allowed the identification of the biochemical mechanisms contributing significantly to salinity tolerance of Salicornia through the maintenance of ion and osmotic homeostasis and protection against oxidative stress.

1. Introduction

While the world’s population is constantly increasing, adverse environmental factors contribute to reducing arable land, making future food security a challenging goal to achieve. High soil salinity has become a growing global problem that seriously threatens sustainable food and feed production. Approximately 109 hectares of the world’s land area (about 7% of total world land) are currently affected by salinity [1]. High salinity has deleterious effects on the physiological and biochemical processes of plants, leading to limited growth and productivity and, eventually, plant death.
One effective strategy to deal with soil salinity is to breed and cultivate halophyte plant species with economic value in saline marginal lands or abandoned cropland affected by secondary salinisation. Halophytes are plants of natural saline habitats [2] that can tolerate high salinity and may even need such environments for optimal growth [3]. Halophytes can be used for food, fodder, biofuels, and soil phytoremediation [4]. Some are also used as medicinal plants or for pharmaceutical purposes because they contain biologically active compounds such as terpenes, phenols, antioxidants, and biological antibacterials [5]. Moreover, an in-depth understanding of the salinity tolerance mechanisms of halophytes can provide valuable scientific insights into the biotechnological improvement of crop resilience against salinity stress. Halophytes employ both short-term responses and long-term adaptive mechanisms to survive and grow in saline environments. Short-term responses often involve rapid biochemical adjustments, such as accumulation of compatible solutes, regulation of ion transport, and activation of antioxidant systems to mitigate immediate osmotic and oxidative stresses. On the other hand, long-term adaptive mechanisms include morphological and physiological changes such as enhanced root architecture or, in some species, the formation of salt glands to sustain plant growth and reproduction under high salinity conditions [6]. Indeed, it is crucial to elucidate how the rapid biochemical responses dynamically evolve as the duration and intensity of salt stress change, allowing halophytes to eventually acquire long-term adaptations to thrive in saline environments.
Salicornia, known by the common names of glasswort or pickleweed, is a genus of halophyte plants belonging to the Amaranthaceae family [7]. These herbaceous plants have medicinal, industrial, and edible properties; they commonly grow in saline soils of coastal areas and the margins of inland salt marshes or salt lakes [8]. Salicornia species are widely distributed in North America, Europe, and Central and South Asia [7]. Members of this genus do not possess salt bladders or salt glands, and thus they are considered models for dissecting the common mechanisms underlying plant tolerance to salinity [9]. Different tolerance mechanisms such as the regulation of transport and compartmentalisation of toxic ions, energy homeostasis, osmotic adjustment by cytosolic accumulation of osmolytes, and detoxification of excessive levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by activating antioxidant systems are utilised by the Salicornia species to adapt to high salt concentrations [10,11,12,13].
Halophytes are equipped with effective enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems to cope with high salinity [14]. Antioxidant enzymes such as peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) play key roles in counteracting the generation of ROS induced by high salinity. Plants with higher antioxidant levels, whether constitutive or induced, have shown greater tolerance to oxidative damage [15]. There are few reports on the enzymatic antioxidant system of Salicornia species activated in response to salt treatments. Salinity significantly enhanced the activities of SOD, CAT, and POD in Salicornia persica and Salicornia europaea [16,17]. Similarly, salinity treatments caused an increase in the activities of APX, SOD, and glutathione reductase (GR) in Salicornia brachiata shoots [18]. On the other hand, a decline in CAT activity was observed in S. brachiata and S. europaea under salinity conditions [18,19]. Oxidative stress induced by salinity can also affect the photosynthetic rate by altering photosynthetic pigment contents. Some halophytic species are capable of maintaining chlorophylls and carotenoids in saline environments [20,21]; however, Salicornia species have shown reduced levels of photosynthetic pigments in response to salt treatments [19,22].
Accumulation of osmolytes such as proline, glycine betaine, polyphenols, and soluble sugars is a common defence mechanism of halophytes to tackle high-salinity conditions [23]. Increased proline content is a typical adaptive response observed in many plant species as soon as stress occurs [24]. Glycine betaine is another essential osmoprotectant that can be accumulated in response to salinity [25]. Glycine betaine can maintain cellular turgor pressure to prevent oxidative stress [26]. Previous reports demonstrated that high salinity induced a significant increase in proline [16,18,20] and glycine betaine [27] contents in S. europaea. Also, in S. persica, proline and glycine betaine concentrations increased with increasing salt concentrations [28].
Halophytes utilise ion homeostasis as a central mechanism to maintain cellular water balance through osmotic adjustment under saline conditions [29]. Salicornia species do not act as salt excluders; on the contrary, they dramatically accumulate Na+ in shoots in response to salt treatments [21]. A high uptake of Na+ can alter the composition of other inorganic ions, particularly potassium, calcium, and magnesium, which are major components of signalling pathways involved in salinity tolerance. Increased salt concentrations decreased the amounts of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in shoots of Salicornia herbacea [30,31] and S. persica [28]. A reduction in K+ content was also observed under varying NaCl concentrations in other Salicornia species, including S. brachiata [18] and S. europaea [16,27]. However, another study in S. europaea reported an increase in shoot K+ concentration under moderate salinity, whereas Na+ and Ca2+ contents increased significantly at all tested NaCl concentrations compared to control plants grown without salt [20].
Less is known about the differences in salinity tolerance in Salicornia species. Few studies have compared the biochemical reactions of different Salicornia species under salinity [17,21]. For instance, S. persica, which is native to central and south-central Iran [32], showed a higher level of tolerance compared to S. europaea, possibly because of more efficient protection against oxidative damage through ion homeostasis and antioxidant activities [17]. It is presumed that salinity-induced biochemical responses get altered with passing time, so multiple measurements of biochemical attributes during exposure to salinity may elucidate the patterns and kinetics of plant stress responses. Time-course evaluations of changes in biochemical variables may clarify some aspects of how Salicornia species can adapt so efficiently to high salinity over time, gaining insights into the biochemical pathways and regulatory mechanisms involved in tolerance to salt stress. No reports, other than that of Parida and Jha [18] on S. brachiata, have yet focused on the temporal changes of biochemical responses of Salicornia species under varying salinity conditions.
The present time-course study aimed to illuminate the short-term temporal variation of biochemical parameters related to salt stress responses in plants of three Salicornia species, S. europaea, S. bigelovii, and S. persica, subjected to NaCl treatments. Therefore, shoot biomass and water content and a collection of biochemical stress biomarkers, including photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids), ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+), osmolytes (proline and glycine betaine), oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2), and antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) activities were determined at different times (one, three, and eight days) after starting the treatments with three different salt concentrations, (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl). The obtained data were subjected to various statistical analyses to better understand the contribution and significance of the biochemical responses in salinity tolerance mechanisms of the tested Salicornia species.

2. Results

2.1. Growth Parameters

The effects of salinity on the growth of the three selected Salicornia species, assessed using fresh biomass and water content of the shoots, were investigated at three sampling times. The analysis of variance showed that the different Salicornia species, salinity treatments, and sampling times had highly significant effects on the fresh weight and water content of the plant shoots. The interactions “Species × Salinity”, “Species × Time”, and “Salinity × Time” were also significant for both parameters, whereas the triple interaction “Species × Salinity × Time” was significant for fresh weight but not for water content (Table 1).
No significant differences in FW were observed one day after starting the NaCl treatments, neither between species nor between salt concentrations, although mean FW values were slightly higher for S. persica than for S. europea and S. bigelovii at all salinity levels (Figure 1a). However, after three or eight days of treatment, the FW of S. persica plants grown under moderate salinity (300 mM NaCl) was significantly higher than that of S. europea and S. bigelovii plants and also higher than in the control, non-treated plants. Under severe salinity conditions (500 mM NaCl), both in the three-day and eight-day samples, shoot biomass was reduced to control values in the three species, although the significant difference between S. persica and the other two Salicornia species was maintained (Figure 1a). Changes in the shoot water content percentages showed a similar qualitative pattern, with significant increases over control values (plants grown in the absence of salt) only in the 300 mM NaCl treatments. However, in this case, a significantly higher WC in S. persica plants compared to the other two species was only detected after eight days of treatment (Figure 1b). These data suggest that the observed increase in shoot fresh biomass at moderate salinity was due, at least in part, to an increase in plant succulence.

2.2. Photosynthetic Pigments Contents

The analysis of variance illustrated the significant effects of the salinity levels and the Salicornia species on the contents of chlorophyll a (Table 1). A significant and rapid decrease in chlorophyll a was observed in plants of the three Salicornia species subjected for one day to high salinity treatment; no further significant reductions in the contents of chlorophyll a were detected at subsequent sampling times after three and eight days of treatment. Minimum chlorophyll a contents (about 60% reduction compared to the corresponding controls) were measured in S. europaea and S. bigelovii plants after eight days of applying 500 mM NaCl, although the observed temporal changes in chlorophyll a contents were not statistically significant. On the other hand, the ANOVA results also showed significant salinity by time interaction, implying that the effect of salinity levels on chlorophyll a contents varied with the sampling times. The Salicornia species showed a different response pattern for the contents of chlorophyll a under moderate salinity; S. persica chlorophyll a levels were similar to those measured under non-saline conditions, whereas the concentrations in the other Salicornia species significantly declined after eight days of treatment with 300 mM NaCl (Figure 2a).
Chlorophyll b and carotenoid contents were significantly affected by the salinity treatments, the Salicornia species, and the sampling times (Table 1). Chlorophyll b concentrations did not exhibit statistically significant differences among plants of the three Salicornia species under any tested experimental condition. In the presence of 300 mM NaCl, the plants could maintain the chlorophyll b contents at similar levels as non-stressed plants at all sampling times. However, these levels decreased significantly for the three species three days after high salinity exposure and remained unchanged at the last sampling time. The minimum chlorophyll b content (53% reduction compared to the non-stressed control) was measured in S. europaea after eight days of high salinity (500 mM NaCl) treatment (Figure 2b).
Regarding carotenoid contents, moderate salinity caused significant reductions in S. europaea and S. bigelovii plants at the last sampling time, but not after one or three days of treatment with 300 mM NaCl. In contrast, under the same conditions, S. persica showed no significant differences in carotenoid concentrations compared to the control plants at any sampling time. However, significant reductions were observed in plants of the three Salicornia species after three or eight days of growth in the presence of 500 mM NaCl. The minimum carotenoid content (46% reduction compared to the non-stressed control) was observed in S. europaea three days after imposing high salinity treatment (Figure 2c). It should be noted that, in general, the average value of photosynthetic pigment levels in salt-treated plants was slightly higher in S. persica than in the other two species (Figure 2).

2.3. Cation Accumulation

The analysis of variance showed a significant effect of the salt treatments on the concentrations of all analysed cations, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ (Table 1). There were also significant differences among sampling times for Na+, K+, and Mg2+ contents, whereas the effect of different Salicornia species was significant only for Mg2+ concentrations (Table 1). More importantly, the triple interaction effect of Salicornia species, salinity, and sampling time was significant on the concentrations of all analysed cations, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ (Table 1). Compared to non-saline conditions, a rapid and sharp increase (up to 13-fold) in the shoot Na+ concentration of Salicornia plants was observed in response to the salt treatments (Figure 3a). The results revealed that Na+ accumulation was dependent on the salt concentration of the irrigation solution, with levels significantly higher in plants subjected to high salinity than in those watered with 300 mM NaCl at all sampling times. At moderate salinity, mean Na+ contents showed an increasing trend with the duration of the treatment. Indeed, S. persica showed a rapid accumulation of Na+ ions after one day of moderate salinity treatment, with no further significant increase at later times. On the other hand, maximum Na+ contents in S. europaea and S. bigelovii plants were measured after eight days of treatment with 300 mM NaCl, values which were significantly higher than those of the first sampling time. In the presence of 500 mM NaCl, on the contrary, maximum Na+ levels were already measured after one day of treatment. No significant differences in Na+ contents were observed between the selected Salicornia species under any tested experimental condition (Figure 3a).
Salt stress reduced mean K+ concentrations (up to ca. 30%) in shoots of Salicornia plants in parallel to the increase in salinity. However, the differences with the control, non-stressed plants were statistically significant, generally only under high salinity conditions. An exception to this general pattern was the K+ content in S. persica after one day of treatment with 500 mM NaCl, which was not significantly different from the corresponding non-saline control or the moderate salinity treatment. The minimum K+ concentration was recorded for S. persica and S. europaea eight days after starting the severe salinity treatment. As for Na+, for each particular treatment and sampling time, no significant differences between species were generally detected (Figure 3b).
Compared to the other cations, Ca2+ concentration was less affected by salinity, showing small, generally non-significant fluctuations and a slightly increasing trend with increasing salinity, observed mainly after one and eight days of treatment. For example, a significant increase in shoot Ca2+ content was detected in S. bigelovii and S. persica after eight days of treatment with 500 mM NaCl, but amounting only to ca. 10% of the non-stressed controls (Figure 3c). On the contrary, a salinity- and time-dependent reduction of Mg2+ concentration was detected in all Salicornia species, with significant differences between severe salinity and non-saline conditions, but not between species. The minimum Mg2+ levels, about 40% of the corresponding controls, were measured eight days after exposure to high salinity (Figure 3d).

2.4. Shoot Osmolytes Contents

The ANOVA results demonstrated that the effects of the main factors (species, salinity, and treatment time) and their interactions on proline and glycine betaine shoot concentrations were highly significant (Table 2). There were no significant differences in proline contents under non-saline conditions between the Salicornia species or sampling times. Proline concentrations augmented in response to the salt treatments in the three species but with different kinetics; in S. bigelovii and S. persica, significant increases were already observed one day after starting the treatments, whereas three days were required to observe the same response in S. europea. Maximum Pro levels were measured after eight days of severe salinity treatment, representing 4.8-, 5.6-, and 7-fold increases over non-stressed controls for S. bigelovii, S. europea, and S. persica, respectively. In this sampling, Pro contents in S. persica were significantly higher than in the other two species in the presence of 300 mM and 500 mM NaCl (Figure 4a). It should be noted that even the maximum Pro value reached in these experiments, 2.9 µmol g−1 DW, is probably too low to exert any substantial osmotic effect in the stressed plants. Nevertheless, proline may still contribute to salt stress tolerance through its additional functions as a low-molecular-weight chaperon, ROS scavenger, or signalling molecule [33].
The applied salt treatments also induced a significant accumulation of glycine betaine in a salinity- and time-dependent manner. For each salt concentration and sampling time, slight and, in most cases, non-significant differences in GB content were found between the three Salicornia species. However, S. persica generally showed higher mean GB amounts than S. europaea and S. bigelovii. The maximum relative increase in GB shoot concentration with respect to non-saline conditions was about 2-fold; however, it should be noted that background levels in the absence of salt were relatively high, over 100 µmol g−1 DW for the three Salicornia species (Figure 4b).

2.5. Oxidative Stress Markers

Malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) contents were determined as reliable indicators of oxidative damage caused by salt stress. The analysis of variance indicated significant effects of the factors studied, including Salicornia species, salinity, sampling times, and their interactions, on the accumulation of MDA and H2O2 (Table 2). Compared to the control plants grown in the absence of salt, MDA content increased significantly (up to 4.4-fold) in response to salinity treatments. This increase was already observed one day after subjecting the plants to severe salinity conditions; at later times, MDA also accumulated in plants watered with 300 mM NaCl. Under moderate- and high-salinity conditions, S. persica exhibited higher average levels of MDA accumulation than the other Salicornia species at three and eight days after exposure to salinity (Figure 5a). The maximum MDA content was recorded for S. persica eight days after the onset of high salinity treatment.
In plants subjected to high salinity (500 mM NaCl), shoot H2O2 contents rapidly increased in all Salicornia species, reaching maximum levels (up to 73% increase compared to the control) one day after starting the treatment, and then declined at later sampling times. In addition, a significant rise, compared to the control conditions, was found in H2O2 contents of all Salicornia species under moderate salinity at the second sampling time. No significant differences in H2O2 contents were found between the three investigated species under the same experimental conditions (Figure 5b).

2.6. Antioxidant Enzymes Activities

The analysis of variance revealed that the activities of the antioxidant enzymes analysed (SOD, CAT, POD, and APX) were significantly affected by salinity levels, Salicornia species, and sampling times, as well as, in most cases, by their interactions (Table 2). SOD activity increased rapidly in the three species in response to the salt treatments; significant differences between high salinity, moderate salinity, and non-saline conditions were already observed after one day, and, for each treatment, the activities did not vary significantly at later sampling times. Comparing the tested Saliconia species, some statistically significant differences in SOD activity were found in plants treated with 500 mM NaCl, but not those grown in the absence of salt or subjected to moderate salinity; for example, S. persica plants showed significantly higher activity than those of S. bigelovii and S. europaea after eight days of treatment. Salicornia persica was also the species with the maximum salt-induced increase in SOD activity, showing a more than 4-fold increase over control values at all sampling times (Figure 6a).
Variations in CAT activity showed an opposite pattern than that of SOD, with maximum mean values calculated under non-saline conditions and a general decreasing trend parallel to the increase in NaCl concentration and the duration of the treatments. However, the differences between moderate and high salinity or between samplings were not statistically significant in some cases. Also, with few exceptions, no significant differences existed between species for plants subjected to the same treatments (Figure 6b).
As for SOD, POD and APX activities were induced by salt stress. POD activity progressively increased with increasing salinity levels and sampling times, and the maximum POD activity was observed in S. persica and S. europaea eight days after exposure to 500 mM NaCl, representing in both cases a relative increase of 2.9-fold over the activity determined in non-stressed plants. Here again, for each specific treatment, differences between species were generally non-significant (Figure 6c). Changes in APX activity followed the same pattern as POD; that is, a general ascending trend in response to salinity treatments and sampling time, although the differences with the non-stressed controls were relatively weaker. Thus, the maximum APX activity levels, measured in plants grown for eight days in the presence of 500 mM NaCl, represented an increase of about twofold with respect to the corresponding controls for the three Salicornia species (Figure 6d). Therefore, except for CAT, the tested antioxidant activities increased in response to the salt treatments, reaching slightly higher levels in S. persica than in S. europaea or S. bigelovii plants (Figure 6).

2.7. Correlation Analysis

The correlation coefficients between the analysed variables were calculated for each salt treatment (Figure 7). The results indicated that the interrelationships between the different traits were affected by the salinity conditions. The strongest positive correlation between plant biomass (shoot FW) and water content was obtained under moderate salinity conditions (300 mM NaCl), which are optimal for Salicornia plant growth. Water content was also highly positively correlated with MDA, chlorophylls a and b, H2O2, glycine betaine, Na+, POD activity, and proline under moderate salinity conditions. Substantial correlations were also found between water content and chlorophylls a and b, Ca2+, and SOD activity under high salinity conditions. There were significant positive correlations between plant biomass and the contents of chlorophylls a and b under non-saline and moderate salinity conditions (Figure 7a,c), although plant biomass was not correlated with photosynthetic pigments under high salinity conditions. While no strong and significant correlations were found between plant biomass and cations concentrations under non-saline and high-salinity conditions (Figure 7a,c), a strong positive correlation was determined between Na+ and plant biomass under moderate salinity (Figure 7b). Moreover, Mg2+ concentration was negatively and significantly correlated with plant biomass under moderate salinity (Figure 7b).
The results also revealed that the osmolytes, glycine betaine and proline, significantly correlated with plant biomass. The relationship between glycine betaine and plant biomass was less affected by salinity treatments, as glycine betaine content was highly and positively correlated with plant biomass under all tested conditions (Figure 7). Proline content, on the other hand, displayed a relatively strong negative correlation with shoot FW in non-stressed controls (Figure 7a) but a positive correlation in moderate salinity-treated plants (Figure 7b). The oxidative damage indicators, MDA and H2O2, exhibited different correlation patterns with plant biomass. Strong positive correlations existed between MDA content and plant biomass under moderate (Figure 7b) and high (Figure 7c) salinity conditions. On the other hand, H2O2 content was positively correlated with plant biomass only under moderate-salinity levels (Figure 7c). H2O2 was also strongly negatively correlated with APX and POD activities under high salinity (Figure 7c). The antioxidant enzymes showed different patterns of correlations with plant biomass under saline conditions. APX and POD activities were positively and significantly correlated with plant biomass under moderate-salinity conditions (Figure 7b), whereas there was a strong negative correlation between SOD and plant biomass under such conditions. In addition, POD followed by APX and SOD displayed considerable positive correlations with plant biomass under high salinity conditions. Indeed, APX and POD activities correlated consistently with each other, as shown by significant positive correlation coefficients, under all the conditions tested (Figure 7). No meaningful correlations were found between CAT activity and Salicornia growth parameters (Figure 7).

2.8. Principal Component Analysis

Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to further assess the relationships amongst the measured parameters and to determine and visualise the magnitude and direction of correlations between the variables and the extracted principal components (PCs) (Figure 8). The first two PCs explained over 71% (54.8% and 16.3%, respectively) of the total variation (the eigenvectors are reported in Supplementary Table S1). The correlation circle and the biplot of the first two components, PC1 and PC2, are represented in Figure 8. The salinity levels were well separated on PC1, which accounted for more than 54% of the total variation. The high-salinity treatment (500 mM NaCl) was located on the positive side of PC1, whereas the non-saline treatment fell onto the negative side. The results revealed strong positive contributions of APX, POD, Na+, glycine betaine, SOD, MDA, and proline to PC1, associated with the data cluster of high-salinity conditions, indicating that Na+ accumulation was associated with the enhanced activities of the antioxidant enzymes and the increased contents of the osmolytes. Conversely, Mg2+, CAT, K+, and photosynthetic pigments were strong negative contributors to PC1, associated with the data cluster of non-saline conditions. Moreover, fresh weight and water content of Salicornia plant shoots were strongly positively correlated with PC2, which explained more than 16% of the total variation (Figure 8a). Plotting data based on PC1 and PC2 confirmed that Salicornia plants exposed to moderate salinity conditions had higher fresh shoot weight and water content percentage. PC2 separated the data according to the sampling times, as the data from one-day sampling were positioned on the negative side of PC2, whereas the data from the eight-day sampling were distributed on the positive side of PC2, tending to correspond to plant biomass under moderate-salinity conditions (Figure 8b). The biplot showed that the barycenters of S. europaea and S. bigelovii were close to each other, implying that they reacted similarly to salt stress, but S. persica data were partially separated from the other species, shifting toward the positive side of PC2, in which its barycenter corresponded to that of moderate-salinity conditions. As a result, S. persica exhibited a relatively higher salinity tolerance than the other two Salicornia species under moderate-salinity conditions (Figure 8b).

2.9. Hierarchical Clustering

A two-way hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to discover groups of similar variables and groups of similar treatments. A heat map generated using two-way cluster analysis is shown in Figure 9. The clustering results were consistent with the results from the PCA and confirmed that salinity level was the major discriminating factor. Accordingly, irrespective of the Salicornia species and sampling times, the data measured in non-saline, moderate-, and high-salinity treatments formed distinct clusters. Moreover, the data collected one day after starting the salt treatments on Salicornia plants were well separated from those measured at later sampling times (Figure 9). Clustering the biochemical and growth parameters revealed a distinct group, including proline, glycine betaine, Na+, Ca2+ MDA, H2O2, SOD, APX, and POD, which generally showed maximum contents or activities under high salinity conditions (Figure 9). In addition, the fresh weight and water content of Salicornia shoots were grouped together and separated from a cluster containing chlorophylls a and b, carotenoids, K+, Mg2+, and CAT, which, contrary to the other traits, showed their minimum values in the presence of salt (Figure 9).

3. Discussion

Salicornia species utilise several cellular adaptive mechanisms that allow them to grow in saline habitats. Enhancing our understanding of the salt-induced biochemical responses is essential to decipher further how Salicornia plants adapt to high salinity. Moreover, the analysis of temporal changes in short-term biochemical responses to salinity of Salicornia species may provide insights into the dynamics of these responses, identifying early indicators of salinity stress, and, finally, an in-depth understanding of adaptation mechanisms. The present study evaluated changes in biomass and biochemical parameters in plants of three Salicornia species during exposure to varying NaCl concentrations for different times. The shoot biomass of Salicornia plants was measured as a distinctive morphological indicator of plant growth performance [31]. Salicornia plants showed optimum growth when exposed to moderate salinity (300 mM NaCl), indicating their capability to counter osmotic, oxidative, and ionic stresses. The increased growth and water content of Salicornia shoots at moderate salinity may result from the accumulation of organic solutes and essential ions to maintain cell turgor pressure, eventually making plants more succulent. In accordance with these results, previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of a certain amount of NaCl on the growth of different Salicornia species [16,18,19,20,28,30,31]. However, the optimum salinity levels reported varied between 100 and 400 mM NaCl, possibly due to interspecific genetic variation for salinity tolerance as well as different times of measuring plant biomass after salt stress application. Throughout the experiment, we measured plant biomass three times, which helped clarify growth differences between Salicornia species in response to varying salinity levels. It is noteworthy that S. persica could maintain its growth under high salinity conditions (500 mM NaCl) and produced significantly higher amounts of shoot biomass than S. europaea and S. bigelovii, indicating a higher salinity tolerance in S. persica. This finding agreed with a previous study that reported higher salinity tolerance in S. persica than in S. europaea [16].
Our results demonstrated that photosynthetic pigment contents (chlorophylls and carotenoids) were negatively affected by salinity, particularly at higher NaCl concentrations, in the three investigated Salicornia species. Salt-induced reductions in photosynthetic pigments have been previously observed in different Salicornia species [19,21,22]. The loss of chlorophylls and carotenoids in response to salt stress may be due to the inactivation of enzymes associated with their biosynthesis or excessive ROS generation [34]. However, non-significant variations in the contents of photosynthetic pigments were generally observed in S. persica between non-saline and moderate salinity conditions over the study’s time course, implying that this Salicornia species can maintain these parameters, to a certain extent, in moderately saline environments. Consequently, the relatively higher concentrations of photosynthetic pigments may contribute to the better growth of S. persica compared to the other Salicornia species under moderate-salinity conditions. The lack of correlation between growth parameters and photosynthetic pigments under high-salinity treatment suggested that the growth performance of Salicornia species under such conditions may not be explained by variations of photosynthetic pigments, contrary to what was reported in the halophytes Arthrocnemum macrostachyum and Sarcocornia fruticosa [20].
Many halophytic species can efficiently transport Na+ to the shoots and compartmentalise it into vacuoles to regulate osmotic potential and maintain water uptake [35]. Accordingly, our results revealed a significant sodium accumulation in the shoots of the three Salicornia species under moderate and high salinity. Similar results have been reported in different species of this genus [16,18,21,28]. Furthermore, rapid and sharp increases in shoot Na+ contents in Salicornia plants under moderate- and high-salinity conditions, shown by temporal measurements, indicated that Salicornia species utilise sodium transport to the shoots as an early response mechanism to deal with salt stress. Previous studies have also reported short-term rapid sodium accumulation in response to salt stress [36,37,38]. In addition to the significant contribution of sodium to Salicornia adaptive responses to salinity, shown with the PCA, it should be noted that sodium content had strong positive correlations with osmolyte (proline and glycine betaine) concentrations under moderate salinity. These findings indicated that the studied Salicornia species could effectively re-establish osmotic and ion homeostasis under moderate salinity, resulting in maximum plant growth.
The Salicornia species exhibited a slight, and in most cases non-significant, decrease in shoot K+ contents in response to moderate salinity, with little temporal variation. Potassium retention is considered a vital component of salinity tolerance in halophytes, as K+ plays key roles in signal transduction and osmotic adjustment [39]. Several studies reported slight changes in K+ contents in halophytes in response to salt stress [20,40,41]. In fact, the relative retention of K+ under moderate salinity would not have been appropriately detected without temporal sampling. On the other hand, a significant decline in K+ concentrations was observed in the high salinity (500 mM NaCl) treatment, which was likely due to the antagonism between Na+ and K+ in their response to salt stress, confirmed with the PCA. Actually, a decrease of K+ in response to increasing Na+ concentrations represents the expected pattern of variation as both cations, which have similar physicochemical properties, compete for the same binding sites in proteins, including K+ membrane channels and transporters [42,43].
The salinity treatments generally caused a slight increase in the shoot Ca2+ contents of the Salicornia species. It has been previously reported that Salicornia plants can retain calcium under moderate- and high-salinity conditions [20,21]. Furthermore, the correlation analysis revealed that Ca2+ and Na+ concentrations were positively associated under high salinity conditions, implying that Ca2+ contributes to salinity tolerance in Salicornia. Ca2+ acts as a critical component in signalling pathways regulating responses of the whole plant to salinity [44]. Our results also uncovered that Mg2+ temporally decreased in response to moderate and high salt-stress treatments, which agrees with previous studies on Salicornia herbacea [30] and Salicornia rubra [45]. The adverse effect of high salinity on plant growth may be partly related to a deficiency of essential nutrients, such as Mg2+ [46].
Proline and glycine betaine are compatible osmolytes that generally accumulate in response to osmotic stress due to drought and high salinity [47]. The present study revealed that proline and glycine betaine levels were significantly and progressively enhanced in plants of the three Salicornia species subjected to moderate- and high-salinity treatments. Furthermore, multivariate statistical analyses illustrated the significant contributions of these osmolytes to the adaptive responses of Salicornia plants to salinity. Increased proline concentrations in response to moderate and high salinity levels have been reported in S. europaea, S. persica, and S. prostrata [16,20,27,28,48]; however, Parida and Jha [18] found proline accumulation in Salicornia brachiata only under high salinity (600 mM NaCl). Proline is the most common compatible solute in plants [33]. Proline accumulation generally maintains osmotic homeostasis and protects enzymes and membranes from ion toxicity under salt stress [49]. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that Salicornia plants exhibited very low amounts of proline in the shoots compared to glycine betaine. This finding is in agreement with previous studies, which found high glycine betaine and low proline contents in some other Salicornia species [21,27] or in the related halophyte Sarcocornia fruticosa [50], implying that glycine betaine is a pivotal osmolyte contributing to salinity tolerance in these halophytic taxa. Moreover, high glycine betaine levels were also observed under non-saline conditions, suggesting that this osmolyte confers a partially constitutive defence mechanism to Salicornia species against salt-induced osmotic stress. This result aligns with those reported by Calone et al. [21] for some other Salicornia species. Also, in a field study including plants of the related species Sarcocornia fruticosa, shoot glycine betaine levels were maintained high and practically constant throughout the year despite the drastic seasonal changes observed in soil salinity and soil Na+ and Cl concentrations [50]. In halophytes, glycine betaine is present at much higher levels than in glycophytes [51]. Furthermore, glycine betaine rapidly accumulated in response to the salt treatments, although further gradual increases occurred at later times. As a result, glycine betaine can be considered an early response indicator for salt stress. Glycine betaine not only acts as an osmolyte, but also interacts with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains of protein complexes, stabilising and protecting these molecules from ROS deleterious effects [51]. Several proline and glycine betaine measurements during the experiment helped to interpret the results more accurately.
The contents of oxidative stress markers, MDA and H2O2, were determined to assess the extent of oxidative stress on Salicornia plants exposed to salt treatments. The content of MDA, an end product of lipid peroxidation [52], reflects the degree of cell membrane damage due to ROS accumulation in plants subjected to environmental stresses. Shoot MDA concentrations increased in Salicornia plants in response to salt stress and showed a positive correlation with Salicornia growth under high-salinity conditions. Similarly, increased levels of MDA have been reported in response to salt treatments in S. persica [16,53], S. europaea [16], S. brachiata [18], and other halophytes, including Arthrocnemum macrostachyum and Sarcocornia fruticosa [20]. In addition, a positive relationship between MDA and the growth of Salicornia plants subjected to salinity treatments has been previously documented [17,18,53], suggesting the plant’s ability to tolerate oxidative stress or exploit salt as a signalling molecule for growth. However, it should be noted that this relationship is complex, and may vary depending on the plant species and the salinity level in its environment. Salicornia plants showed a significant elevation in H2O2 contents over the non-saline conditions up to the first three days after exposure to moderate and high salinity levels; this response may be due to an impairment of H2O2 scavenging, imposed by oxidative stress at later times. Increased contents of H2O2 in response to high salinity have been previously found in S. europaea [16,19]. However, analysis of temporal changes of H2O2 contents showed no further increase and remained relatively stable at the last sampling time (after eight days of applying the salt treatment), in parallel to the increased activities of antioxidant enzymes such as POD and APX, which catalyse its elimination. This finding suggested that these halophytes possess effective antioxidant systems to cope with oxidative stress by preventing the overproduction of H2O2. H2O2 is an essential molecular signal mediating several biological processes responding to environmental stresses [54].
One of the harmful effects of salinity on plant growth and development is the excessive generation of ROS, such as superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals. Halophytes are supposed to activate efficient antioxidant mechanisms to remove ROS and mitigate oxidative damage under saline conditions [55]. Hence, we evaluated the activities of four antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, POD, and APX) to better assess Salicornia’s adaptive responses. The Salicornia species exhibited a rapid and significant induction of all antioxidant activities, except CAT, in response to moderate and high salinity treatments. SOD, POD, and APX generally showed similar temporal trends, reaching the maximum activities eight days after starting the moderate and high salinity treatments. Similarly, SOD and APX activities have been reported to temporally increase in S. brachiata plants subjected to different salinity levels [18]. SOD enzymes constitute the protection front line against ROS by dismutating superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen [56]. Previous studies also reported enhanced levels of SOD activities upon different salt treatments in S. persica [16,53], S. europaea [16], and some other halophytes such as Suaeda maritima [57] and Zygophyllum coccenium [58]. It is worth mentioning that S. persica could maintain a high level of SOD activity under high salinity conditions at all sampling times, which probably contributes to the higher salinity tolerance of S. persica compared to the other two species. Accordingly, a higher increase in S. persica SOD activity has been previously associated with its higher salinity tolerance compared to S. europaea [16].
Opposite to SOD, the Salicornia CAT activities decreased with increasing salinity and treatment times. This agrees with the results reported by Parida and Jha [18], who demonstrated a decline in CAT activities of S. brachiata with extended exposure to moderate and high salinity. This variation pattern suggests that CAT is a less efficient scavenger of H2O2 in Salicornia, which could be explained by its relatively poor affinity for H2O2 and its photo-inactivation with subsequent degradation in the presence of light [59].
APX and POD activities generally increased in shoots of the Salicornia plants in response to increased salinity levels and sampling times; therefore, the highest APX and POD activities were determined eight days after starting the treatment with 500 mM NaCl. Furthermore, the significant contributions of APX and POD to Salicornia growth under salt stress are supported by the applied statistical analyses, including the determination of correlation coefficients, PCA, and cluster analysis. To our knowledge, no previous reports have discussed the crucial role of APX in response to salinity in the three Salicornia species investigated here, although a salt-induced increase in APX activity has been observed in S. brachiata [18] and other halophytes [60,61]. Also, in agreement with our data, enhanced POD activity under salt stress conditions has been documented in S. europaea [19,20]. Therefore, the present study supports the notion that APX and POD play major protective roles against oxidative stress, contributing toward salinity tolerance in Salicornia species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

The study was conducted in the greenhouse of the Department of Plant Production and Genetics, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. The experiment was performed in a factorial arrangement based on a completely randomised design with three replicates to assess the effects of three salinity levels (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on biochemical traits of three Salicornia species (S. persica, S. europaea, and S. bigelovii), at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). Salicornia seeds were obtained from the Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute of Iran. Seeds were sown in plastic pots (diameter: 21 cm; height: 20 cm) filled with 4.5 kg of a sterilised mixture of clay loam soil: sand: perlite (2:1:1). The soil mixture had a field capacity (FC) of 14%, a pH of 7.2, and an electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.8 dS/m. Considering the need for multiple samples, four pots were assigned to each of nine combinations of salinity levels and Salicornia species per replicate. The pots were regularly irrigated with tap water (EC = 0.5 dS/m) to maintain soil moisture at the level of FC. Two-month-old plants of uniform size were subjected to salt treatments (irrigation with 300 mM and 500 mM NaCl aqueous solutions). The plants were grown under greenhouse conditions with natural photoperiod, average day/night temperatures of 25 °C/20 °C, and relative humidity of 70% ± 5%. Shoots were collected at the established sampling times from plants of each Salicornia species subjected to salt treatments or grown in the absence of salt (controls).

4.2. Growth Parameters

The growth of Salicornia plants was evaluated based on the changes in fresh and dry weights of plant shoots in response to the treatments applied. Four plants from each species per replicate were harvested at 1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments, and the fresh weight of the shoots was immediately determined. Part of the shoot material was then placed into an oven at 70 °C for 48 h and weighed again to record dry weights. The water content percentage of each sample was determined according to the following formula:
WC (%) = [(FW − DW)/FW] × 100

4.3. Photosynthetic Pigments

The contents of photosynthetic pigments, including chlorophyll a (Chl. a), chlorophyll b (Chl. b), and carotenoids (Car), were spectrophotometrically determined according to a previously described protocol [62]. Fresh plant shoots (0.1 g) were homogenised in 10 mL of 80% acetone in the dark until the residue became colourless, and then centrifuged at 13,000× g for 10 min. The supernatant absorbance was read at 470, 646, and 663 nm, and the contents of chlorophylls and carotenoids were calculated using the equations described by Lichtenthaler and Wellburn [62].

4.4. Quantification of Cations

Shoot samples were oven-dried at 70 °C for 48 h and finely ground to quantify cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+). The samples (0.5 g each) were reduced to ashes at 580 °C for 4 h and then digested with 5 mL of 2 N HCl. The resulting solutions were passed through filter paper, and the samples were diluted with double distilled water to a final volume of 50 mL. Na+ and K+ were quantified with a flame photometer (PFP7, Jenway, Staffordshire, UK) [63], whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ were determined using an atomic absorption spectrometer (AA-670, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) [64].

4.5. Proline and Glycine Betaine

The method of [65] was used to measure proline content. For each sample, 0.5 g of plant shoot was homogenised in 10 mL of 3% (w/v) sulphosalicylic acid. The mixture was then filtered through Whatman No. 2 filter paper. The extract was mixed with acid ninhydrin reagent and acetic acid, incubated at 100 °C for 1 h, and then cooled on ice for 10 min. The sample was extracted with toluene, and the organic phase was used to determine spectrophotometrically proline content by reading the absorbance at 520 nm, with toluene as the blank, in a UV-visible spectrophotometer (7315 UV/VIS, Jenway, Staffordshire, UK). Proline concentrations, expressed in µmol g−1 DW, were calculated from a standard curve obtained using parallel assays with known proline concentrations.
Glycine betaine contents were determined following the method described by Grieve and Grattan [66]. Dried and finely ground shoot material (0.5 g) was shaken with 20 mL of distilled water for 24 h at 25 °C. Following filtration, the extract was diluted (1:1) with 2 N H2SO4 and cooled in ice for 1 h. Then, 0.5 mL of the sample was added to 0.2 mL of cold KI-I2 reagent and gently vortexed. The mixture was kept at 4 °C for 16 h and subsequently centrifuged at 10,000× g for 15 min at 0 °C. The supernatant was removed, and the formed crystals were dissolved into 9 mL of cold 1,2- dichloroethane. After two hours, the absorbance was recorded at 365 nm. Glycine betaine concentration was estimated using a standard curve and expressed as μmol g−1 DW.

4.6. MDA and H2O2

Lipid peroxidation of the samples was estimated by measuring MDA content [67]. For each plant sample, 0.25 g of shoots were homogenised in 5 mL of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. An amount of 1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 4 mL of 0.5% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in TCA (20% w/v). The mixture was heated at 95 °C for 30 min, immediately cooled on ice, and then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 532 nm and 600 nm (non-specific turbidity). MDA content was calculated from the difference between the absorbance values using an extinction coefficient of 155 mM−1 cm−1.
Hydrogen peroxide content was quantified using the method of [68]. In total, 0.5 g of fresh plant shoots was homogenised in an ice bath with 5 mL of 0.1% TCA. After centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min, 0.5 mL of the supernatant was added to 0.5 mL of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 1 mL of 1 M potassium iodide. The absorbance was read at 390 nm, and the H2O2 content was calculated from a standard curve and expressed as μmol g−1 DW.

4.7. Antioxidant Enzyme Assays

Plant shoot samples (0.5 g) were homogenised in ice-cold phosphate buffer (pH 7.6). The homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the antioxidant enzyme activities were measured spectrophotometrically in the supernatants. Protein contents in the supernatants were measured according to Bradford’s method [69]. SOD activity was determined based on the inhibition of the photochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) by superoxide radicals [70]. One SOD unit was defined as the amount of enzyme required for 50% inhibition of NBT reduction at 560 nm. CAT activity was estimated by measuring at 240 nm the rate of disappearance of H2O2 [71]. One CAT unit was defined as the amount of enzyme required to decompose one mmol H2O2 per minute under the assay conditions. POD activity was assayed following a previously published protocol [72]. The measurement is based on monitoring guaiacol oxidation at 470 nm in the presence of H2O2. The absorbance of the reaction solution was read for 1 minute at 10-s intervals. One unit of POD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme causing an absorbance change of 0.01 per minute. APX activity was measured based on the decrease of the absorbance at 290 nm due to the oxidation of ascorbic acid [73]. One unit of APX activity was defined as the amount of enzyme oxidising one mmol ascorbate per minute.

4.8. Statistical Analyses

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test the effects of salinity, Salicornia species, sampling times, and their interactions on the measured variables. Mean comparisons were conducted using Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05. Pearson’s correlation coefficients, principal component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward’s method were conducted to establish the relationships between the analysed traits and to explore their relative significance on Salicornia growth under salinity conditions. R statistical software (Version 4.3.2; https://www.R-project.org; accessed on 20 November 2023) was used for all statistical analyses.

5. Conclusions

This study clearly shows changes in shoot biomass and several biochemical parameters of the three selected Salicornia species in response to moderate- and high-salinity treatments in a temporal sequence. The maximum growth of Salicornia plants was observed under moderate salinity. The results presented here identified the biochemical attributes with vital contributions to salinity tolerance of Salicornia through the maintenance of osmotic and ion homeostasis and protection against oxidative stress. Salicornia plants activate an efficient antioxidant enzymatic system that mainly relies on APX and POD activities to alleviate oxidative stress under moderate salinity conditions. The results also reveal that glycine betaine accumulation, both constitutive and induced by salt stress, represents a critical tolerance mechanism through osmotic adjustment in Salicornia plants subjected to salinity. Furthermore, high and rapid Na+ accumulation coupled with a relative retention of K+ and Ca2+ in plants subjected to salt stress treatments is another significant biochemical response contributing to osmotic and ionic balance, conferring salinity tolerance to Salicornia species. Notably, the relative retention of K+ and Ca2+ under moderate salinity could not be accurately inferred without measurements at different treatment times. We also showed that although the three investigated Salicornia species use the same biochemical mechanisms to respond to salt stress, S. persica is more tolerant to salinity than S. europaea and S. bigelovii, as evidenced by its better growth under moderate and high salinity conditions. This higher salinity tolerance was associated with higher activities of antioxidant enzymes, SOD, POD and APX, and relatively higher accumulation of glycine betaine and proline in S. persica compared to the other Salicornia species. Overall, this study provided relevant information on the role and significance of different biochemical response mechanisms on salinity tolerance in Salicornia species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13070979/s1, Table S1: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the first two components of principal components analysis for the variables measured in three Salicornia species (S. persica, S. europea, and S. bigelovii) under non-saline, moderate (300 mM NaCl), and high (500 mM NaCl) salinity conditions during three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after applying salinity). Abbreviations: fresh weight (FW); water content (WC); chlorophyll a (Chla), chlorophyll b (Chlb), carotenoids (Car); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); malondialdehyde (MDA); glycine betaine (GB); proline (PRO); peroxidase (POD); catalase (CAT); superoxide dismutase (SOD); ascorbate peroxidase (APX); sodium (Na+); potassium (K+); calcium (Ca2+); magnesium (Mg2+).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.R.; methodology, H.R.; software, M.I.; formal analysis, H.H. and M.I.; investigation, H.H.; resources, H.R. and S.A.K.; data curation, H.R. and O.V.; writing—original draft preparation, H.H.; writing—review and editing, H.R., A.A., A.N., S.A.K. and O.V.; visualization, H.H. and M.I.; supervision, H.R.; funding acquisition, H.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available within the article or Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hopmans, J.W.; Qureshi, A.; Kisekka, I.; Munns, R.; Grattan, S.; Rengasamy, P.; Ben-Gal, A.; Assouline, S.; Javaux, M.; Minhas, P. Critical knowledge gaps and research priorities in global soil salinity. Adv. Agron. 2021, 169, 1–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morton, M.J.; Awlia, M.; Al-Tamimi, N.; Saade, S.; Pailles, Y.; Negrão, S.; Tester, M. Salt stress under the scalpel–dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance. Plant J. 2019, 97, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Accogli, R.; Tomaselli, V.; Direnzo, P.; Perrino, E.V.; Albanese, G.; Urbano, M.; Laghetti, G. Edible halophytes and halo-tolerant species in Apulia region (Southeastern Italy): Biogeography, traditional food use and potential sustainable crops. Plants 2023, 12, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cárdenas-Pérez, S.; Piernik, A.; Chanona-Pérez, J.; Grigore, M.; Perea-Flores, M. An overview of the emerging trends of the Salicornia L. genus as a sustainable crop. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 191, 104606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arya, S.S.; Devi, S.; Ram, K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, N.; Mann, A.; Kumar, A.; Chand, G. Halophytes: The plants of therapeutic medicine. In Ecophysiology, Abiotic Stress Responses and Utilization of Halophytes; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 271–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pérez Cuadra, V.; Verolo, M.; Cambi, V. Morphological and anatomical traits of halophytes: Adaptive versus phylogenetic value. In Handbook of Halophytes: From Molecules to Ecosystems towards Biosaline Agriculture; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  7. Singh, D.; Buhmann, A.K.; Flowers, T.J.; Seal, C.E.; Papenbrock, J. Salicornia as a crop plant in temperate regions: Selection of genetically characterized ecotypes and optimization of their cultivation conditions. AoB Plants 2014, 6, plu071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patel, K.K. The new deal. In The New Deal; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nakahara, Y.; Sawabe, S.; Kainuma, K.; Katsuhara, M.; Shibasaka, M.; Suzuki, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Oguri, S.; Sakamoto, H. Yeast functional screen to identify genes conferring salt stress tolerance in Salicornia europaea. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aliakbari, M.; Razi, H.; Alemzadeh, A.; Tavakol, E. RNA-seq transcriptome profiling of the halophyte Salicornia persica in response to salinity. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 707–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yadav, N.S.; Rashmi, D.; Singh, D.; Agarwal, P.K.; Jha, B. A novel salt-inducible gene SbSI-1 from Salicornia brachiata confers salt and desiccation tolerance in E. coli. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 1943–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duan, H.; Tiika, R.J.; Tian, F.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Cui, G.; Yang, H. Metabolomics analysis unveils important changes involved in the salt tolerance of Salicornia europaea. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1097076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Grigore, M.-N.; Vicente, O. Wild Halophytes: Tools for understanding salt tolerance mechanisms of plants and for adapting agriculture to climate change. Plants 2023, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Asadullah; Bano, A. Climate change modulates halophyte secondary metabolites to reshape rhizosphere halobacteria for biosaline agriculture. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koca, H.; Bor, M.; Özdemir, F.; Türkan, İ. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzymes and proline content of sesame cultivars. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aghaleh, M.; Niknam, V.; Ebrahimzadeh, H.; Razavi, K. Effect of salt stress on physiological and antioxidative responses in two species of Salicornia (S. persica and S. europaea). Acta Physiol. Plant 2011, 33, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aghaleh, M.; Niknam, V.; Ebrahimzadeh, H.; Razavi, K. Antioxidative enzymes in two in vitro cultured Salicornia species in response to increasing salinity. Biol. Plant 2014, 58, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parida, A.K.; Jha, B. Salt tolerance mechanisms in mangroves: A review. Trees 2010, 24, 199–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cárdenas-Pérez, S.; Rajabi Dehnavi, A.; Leszczyński, K.; Lubińska-Mielińska, S.; Ludwiczak, A.; Piernik, A. Salicornia europaea L. functional traits indicate its optimum growth. Plants 2022, 11, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ghanem, A.-M.F.; Mohamed, E.; Kasem, A.M.; El-Ghamery, A.A. Differential salt tolerance strategies in three halophytes from the same ecological habitat: Augmentation of antioxidant enzymes and compounds. Plants 2021, 10, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Calone, R.; Mircea, D.-M.; González-Orenga, S.; Boscaiu, M.; Lambertini, C.; Barbanti, L.; Vicente, O. Recovery from salinity and drought stress in the perennial Sarcocornia fruticosa vs. the annual Salicornia europaea and S. veneta. Plants 2022, 11, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Aghaleh, M.; Niknam, V.; Ebrahimzadeh, H.; Razavi, K. Salt stress effects on growth, pigments, proteins and lipid peroxidation in Salicornia persica and S. europaea. Biol. Plant 2009, 53, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mishra, A.; Tanna, B. Halophytes: Potential resources for salt stress tolerance genes and promoters. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suriyan, C.-u.; Chalermpol, K. Proline accumulation, photosynthetic abilities and growth characters of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plantlets in response to iso-osmotic salt and water-deficit stress. Agric. Sci. China 2009, 8, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mansour, M.M.F.; Ali, E.F. Glycinebetaine in saline conditions: An assessment of the current state of knowledge. Acta Physiol. Plant 2017, 39, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siddiqui, S.A.; Kumari, A.; Rathore, M.S. Glycine betaine as a major osmolyte under abiotic stress in halophytes. In Handbook of Halophytes: From Molecules to Ecosystems towards Biosaline Agriculture; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 2069–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moghaieb, R.E.; Saneoka, H.; Fujita, K. Effect of salinity on osmotic adjustment, glycinebetaine accumulation and the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene expression in two halophytic plants, Salicornia europaea and Suaeda maritima. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 1345–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahmad, S.T.; Sima, N.A.K.K.; Mirzaei, H.H. Effects of sodium chloride on physiological aspects of Salicornia persica growth. J. Plant Nutr. 2013, 36, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shabala, S.; Mackay, A. Ion transport in halophytes. In Advances in Botanical Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 57, pp. 151–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amiri, B.; Assareh, M.; Rasouli, B.; Jafari, M.; Arzani, H.; Jafari, A. Effect of salinity on growth, ion content and water status of glasswort (Salicornia herbacea L.). Casp. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 8, 79–87. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, S.J.; Jeong, E.-M.; Ki, A.Y.; Oh, K.-S.; Kwon, J.; Jeong, J.-H.; Chung, N.-J. Oxidative defense metabolites induced by salinity stress in roots of Salicornia herbacea. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 206, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Akhani, H. Salicornia persica Akhani (Chenopodiaceae), a remarkable new species from Central Iran. Linz. Biol. Beitr. 2003, 35, 607–612. [Google Scholar]
  33. Szabados, L.; Savouré, A. Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arif, Y.; Singh, P.; Siddiqui, H.; Bajguz, A.; Hayat, S. Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in plants: An omic approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Flowers, T.J.; Munns, R.; Colmer, T.D. Sodium chloride toxicity and the cellular basis of salt tolerance in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hernandez, M.; Fernandez-Garcia, N.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Olmos, E. A different role for hydrogen peroxide and the antioxidative system under short and long salt stress in Brassica oleracea roots. J. Exp. Bot 2010, 61, 521–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Peng, Z.; He, S.; Sun, J.; Pan, Z.; Gong, W.; Lu, Y.; Du, X. Na+ compartmentalization related to salinity stress tolerance in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hsouna, A.B.; Ghneim-Herrera, T.; Romdhane, W.B.; Dabbous, A.; Saad, R.B.; Brini, F.; Abdelly, C.; Hamed, K.B. Early effects of salt stress on the physiological and oxidative status of the halophyte Lobularia maritima. Funct. Plant Biol. 2020, 47, 912–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Percey, W.J.; Shabala, L.; Wu, Q.; Su, N.; Breadmore, M.C.; Guijt, R.M.; Bose, J.; Shabala, S. Potassium retention in leaf mesophyll as an element of salinity tissue tolerance in halophytes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 109, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kefu, Z.; Hai, F.; San, Z.; Jie, S. Study on the salt and drought tolerance of Suaeda salsa and Kalanchoe claigremontiana under iso-osmotic salt and water stress. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parida, A.K.; Das, A.; Mittra, B. Effects of salt on growth, ion accumulation, photosynthesis and leaf anatomy of the mangrove, Bruguiera parviflora. Trees 2004, 18, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Greenway, H.; Munns, R. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1980, 31, 149–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Flowers, T.; Hajibagheri, M.; Clipson, N. Halophytes. Q. Rev. Biol. 1986, 61, 313–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Julkowska, M.M.; Testerink, C. Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khan, M.A.; Gul, B.; Weber, D.J. Effect of salinity on the growth and ion content of Salicornia rubra. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2001, 32, 2965–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khan, M.A.; Ungar, I.A.; Showalter, A.M. The effect of salinity on the growth, water status, and ion content of a leaf succulent perennial halophyte, Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk. J. Arid Environ. 2000, 45, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rhodes, D.; Hanson, A. Quaternary ammonium and tertiary sulfonium compounds in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1993, 44, 357–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Akcin, A.; Yalcin, E. Effect of salinity stress on chlorophyll, carotenoid content, and proline in Salicornia prostrata Pall. and Suaeda prostrata Pall. subsp. prostrata (Amaranthaceae). Rev. Bras. Bot. 2016, 39, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gil, R.; Bautista, I.; Boscaiu, M.; Lidón, A.; Wankhade, S.; Sánchez, H.; Llinares, J.; Vicente, O. Responses of five Mediterranean halophytes to seasonal changes in environmental conditions. AoB Plants 2014, 6, plu049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Annunziata, M.G.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Woodrow, P.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Carillo, P. Spatial and temporal profile of glycine betaine accumulation in plants under abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 5th ed.; Oxforf University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  53. Moghaddam, A.; Larijani, H.R.; Oveysi, M.; Moghaddam, H.R.T.; Nasri, M. Alleviating the adverse effects of salinity stress on Salicornia persica using sodium nitroprusside and potassium nitrate. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox sensing and signalling associated with reactive oxygen in chloroplasts, peroxisomes and mitochondria. Physiol. Plant. 2003, 119, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rahman, M.M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Keya, S.S.; Siddiqui, M.N.; Ansary, M.M.U.; Das, A.K.; Rahman, M.A.; Tran, L.S.-P. Adaptive mechanisms of halophytes and their potential in improving salinity tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mohamed, E.; Matsuda, R.; El-Khatib, A.A.; Takechi, K.; Takano, H.; Takio, S. Characterization of the superoxide dismutase genes of the halophyte Suaeda maritima in Japan and Egypt. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 2099–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mohamed, E.; Kasem, A.M.; Gobouri, A.A.; Elkelish, A.; Azab, E. Influence of maternal habitat on Salinity tolerance of Zygophyllum coccineum with regard to seed germination and growth parameters. Plants 2020, 9, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Shang, W.; Feierabend, J. Dependence of catalase photoinactivation in rye leaves on light intensity and quality and characterization of a chloroplast-mediated inactivation in red light. Photosynth. Res. 1999, 59, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mohammadi, F.; Kavousi, H.R.; Mansouri, M. Effects of salt stress on physio-biochemical characters and gene expressions in halophyte grass Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth. Acta Physiol. Plant 2019, 41, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Muchate, N.S.; Nikalje, G.C.; Rajurkar, N.S.; Suprasanna, P.; Nikam, T.D. Physiological responses of the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum to salt stress and their relevance for saline soil bio-reclamation. Flora 2016, 224, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 603, 591–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Overman, R.R.; Davis, A. The application of flame photometry to sodium and potassium determinations in biological fluids. J. Biol. Chem. 1947, 168, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hanlon, E. Determination of potassium, calcium, and magnesium in plants by atomic absorption techniques. Plant Anal. Ref. Proced. South. Reg. United States South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 1992, 368, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bates, L.; Waldren, R.A.; Teare, I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grieve, C.; Grattan, S. Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quaternary ammonium compounds. Plant Soil 1983, 70, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sergiev, I.; Alexieva, V.; Karanov, E. Effect of spermine, atrazine and combination between them on some endogenous protective systems and stress markers in plants. Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 1997, 51, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Beauchamp, C.; Fridovich, I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1971, 44, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dhindsa, R.S.; Plumb-Dhindsa, P.; Thorpe, T.A. Leaf senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J. Exp. Bot. 1981, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chance, B.; Maehly, A. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol. 1955, 2, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on the fresh weight (FW) (a) and water content (WC) (b) of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Figure 1. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on the fresh weight (FW) (a) and water content (WC) (b) of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Plants 13 00979 g001
Figure 2. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on chlorophyll a (Chl. A) (a), chlorophyll b (Chl. B) (b), and carotenoids (Car) (c) of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Figure 2. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on chlorophyll a (Chl. A) (a), chlorophyll b (Chl. B) (b), and carotenoids (Car) (c) of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Plants 13 00979 g002
Figure 3. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on sodium (Na+) (a), potassium (K+) (b), calcium (Ca2+) (c), and magnesium (Mg2+) (d) shoot contents of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Figure 3. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on sodium (Na+) (a), potassium (K+) (b), calcium (Ca2+) (c), and magnesium (Mg2+) (d) shoot contents of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Plants 13 00979 g003
Figure 4. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on proline (PRO) (a) and glycine betaine (GB) (b) shoot contents of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Figure 4. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on proline (PRO) (a) and glycine betaine (GB) (b) shoot contents of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Plants 13 00979 g004
Figure 5. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on malondialdehyde (MDA) (a) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (b) shoot contents of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Figure 5. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on malondialdehyde (MDA) (a) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (b) shoot contents of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Plants 13 00979 g005
Figure 6. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on the activities of superoxide dismutasa (SOD) (a), catalase (CAT) (b), peroxidase (POD) (c), and ascorbate peroxidase (d) in shoot extracts of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Figure 6. Effects of salt treatments (0, 300, and 500 mM NaCl) on the activities of superoxide dismutasa (SOD) (a), catalase (CAT) (b), peroxidase (POD) (c), and ascorbate peroxidase (d) in shoot extracts of the three selected Salicornia species (S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica) at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). The values are means ± SD. Different lowercase letters over the bars indicate significant differences between mean values; HSD values (p ≤ 0.05) are included for comparing the means.
Plants 13 00979 g006
Figure 7. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the different traits determined under non-saline conditions (a), moderate-salinity (300 mM NaCl) (b), and high-salinity (500 mM NaCl) (c) conditions. The colour gradient shows correlation ranges from blue (positive) to red (negative). Abbreviations: carotenoids (Car); chlorophyll b (Chlb); chlorophyll a (Chla); water content (WC); fresh weight (FW); magnesium (Mg); calcium (Ca); sodium (Na); potassium (K); malondialdehyde (MDA); proline (PRO); glycine betaine (GB); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); ascorbate peroxidase (APX); superoxide dismutase (SOD); catalase (CAT); peroxidase (POD).
Figure 7. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the different traits determined under non-saline conditions (a), moderate-salinity (300 mM NaCl) (b), and high-salinity (500 mM NaCl) (c) conditions. The colour gradient shows correlation ranges from blue (positive) to red (negative). Abbreviations: carotenoids (Car); chlorophyll b (Chlb); chlorophyll a (Chla); water content (WC); fresh weight (FW); magnesium (Mg); calcium (Ca); sodium (Na); potassium (K); malondialdehyde (MDA); proline (PRO); glycine betaine (GB); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); ascorbate peroxidase (APX); superoxide dismutase (SOD); catalase (CAT); peroxidase (POD).
Plants 13 00979 g007
Figure 8. Principal component analysis (PCA). Loading plot of the first two principal components for the variables examined (a). Abbreviations: fresh weight (FW); water content (WC); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); malondialdehyde (MDA); glycine betaine (GB); proline (PRO); peroxidase (POD); catalase (CAT); superoxide dismutase (SOD); ascorbate peroxidase (APX); sodium (Na+); potassium (K+); calcium (Ca2+); magnesium (Mg2+). PCA score plots (b) for salt treatments: non-saline (NS), moderate salinity (MS), and high salinity (HS); Salicornia species; S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica; and sampling times: one day (T1), three days (T2), and eight days (T3) after starting the treatments.
Figure 8. Principal component analysis (PCA). Loading plot of the first two principal components for the variables examined (a). Abbreviations: fresh weight (FW); water content (WC); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); malondialdehyde (MDA); glycine betaine (GB); proline (PRO); peroxidase (POD); catalase (CAT); superoxide dismutase (SOD); ascorbate peroxidase (APX); sodium (Na+); potassium (K+); calcium (Ca2+); magnesium (Mg2+). PCA score plots (b) for salt treatments: non-saline (NS), moderate salinity (MS), and high salinity (HS); Salicornia species; S. bigelovii, S. europaea, and S. persica; and sampling times: one day (T1), three days (T2), and eight days (T3) after starting the treatments.
Plants 13 00979 g008
Figure 9. Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering heat map of the traits measured in shoots of the three Salicornia species, S. europaea (E), S. persica (P), and S. bigelovii (B) under non-saline (NS), moderately saline (MS), and highly saline (HS) conditions, and after one day (T1), three days (T2), and eight days (T3) of applying the salt treatments. Abbreviations: fresh weight (FW); water content (WC); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); malondialdehyde (MDA); glycine betaine (GB); proline (PRO); peroxidase (POD); catalase (CAT); superoxide dismutase (SOD); ascorbate peroxidase (APX); sodium (Na+); potassium (K+); calcium (Ca2+); magnesium (Mg2+).
Figure 9. Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering heat map of the traits measured in shoots of the three Salicornia species, S. europaea (E), S. persica (P), and S. bigelovii (B) under non-saline (NS), moderately saline (MS), and highly saline (HS) conditions, and after one day (T1), three days (T2), and eight days (T3) of applying the salt treatments. Abbreviations: fresh weight (FW); water content (WC); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); malondialdehyde (MDA); glycine betaine (GB); proline (PRO); peroxidase (POD); catalase (CAT); superoxide dismutase (SOD); ascorbate peroxidase (APX); sodium (Na+); potassium (K+); calcium (Ca2+); magnesium (Mg2+).
Plants 13 00979 g009
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the variables measured in three Salicornia species (S. persica, S. europea, and S. bigelovii) under non-saline, moderate (300 mM NaCl), and high (500 mM NaCl) salinity conditions at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). Abbreviations: fresh weight (FW); water content (WC); chlorophyll a (Chl. a); chlorophyll b (Chl. b); carotenoids (Car). sodium (Na+); potassium (K+); calcium (Ca2+); magnesium (Mg2+).
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the variables measured in three Salicornia species (S. persica, S. europea, and S. bigelovii) under non-saline, moderate (300 mM NaCl), and high (500 mM NaCl) salinity conditions at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). Abbreviations: fresh weight (FW); water content (WC); chlorophyll a (Chl. a); chlorophyll b (Chl. b); carotenoids (Car). sodium (Na+); potassium (K+); calcium (Ca2+); magnesium (Mg2+).
Mean Squares
DfFWWCChl. aChl. bCarNa+K+Ca2+Mg2+
Species20.88 **17.83 **1.26 **0.87 **0.24 **218,549 ns10,357 ns211 ns19,505 **
Salinity20.40 **135.49 **20.89 **8.13 **2.28 **935,837,253 **996,868 **4293 **787,916 **
Time20.79 **14.86 **0.02 ns0.31 **0.16 **4,431,883 **40,298 **70 ns46,001 **
Species × Salinity40.05 *2.72 *0.10 ns0.19 **0.03 ns857,253 ns15,407 *393 **3842 **
Species × Time40.07 **2.98 *0.10 ns0.06 ns0.01 ns882,716 ns29,642 **331 *777 ns
Salinity × Time40.10 **14.64 **0.49 **0.42 **0.19 **4,675,309 **4098 ns1096 **16,638 **
Species × Salinity × Time80.02 *0.62 ns0.03 ns0.04 ns0.02 *1,188,642 **15,534 **257 *1948 **
Residuals540.0081.110.070.050.01392,747435298732
CV%4.111.3310.4810.509.878.516.051.385.36
ns: Non-significant; *: Significant at p < 0.05; **: Significant at p < 0.01.
Table 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the biochemical variables measured in three Salicornia species (S. persica, S. europea, and S. bigelovii) under non-saline, moderate (300 mM NaCl), and high (500 mM NaCl) salinity conditions at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). Abbreviations: proline (PRO); glycine betaine (GB); malondialdehyde (MDA); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); superoxide dismutase (SOD); catalase (CAT); peroxidase (POD); ascorbate peroxidase (APX).
Table 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the biochemical variables measured in three Salicornia species (S. persica, S. europea, and S. bigelovii) under non-saline, moderate (300 mM NaCl), and high (500 mM NaCl) salinity conditions at three sampling times (1, 3, and 8 days after starting the treatments). Abbreviations: proline (PRO); glycine betaine (GB); malondialdehyde (MDA); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); superoxide dismutase (SOD); catalase (CAT); peroxidase (POD); ascorbate peroxidase (APX).
Mean Squares
dfPROGBMDAH2O2SODCATPODAPX
Species20.46 **6304 **0.65 **0.06 *25.94 **1.88 **338.41 **1.04 **
Salinity212.16 **77,777 **21.30 **1.64 **6828.96 **114.59 **14,595 **18.60 **
Time23.88 **1527 **2.70 **0.11 **65.91 **3.31 **366.75 **2.99 **
Species × Salinity40.19 **935 **0.10 **0.04 *65.55 **1.36 **22.73 *0.13 **
Species × Time40.47 **524 **0.40 **0.009 ns6.81 *0.28 ns23.84 *0.03 ns
Salinity × Time41.27 **1133 **0.99 **0.63 **19.79 **0.65 **110.32 **0.73 **
Species × Salinity × Time80.21 **361 *0.18 **0.02 *4.40 ns0.37 **15.49 *0.02 *
Residuals540.011390.020.012.160.137.370.01
CV% 9.336.229.396.895.376.245.564.43
ns: Non-significant; *: Significant at p < 0.05; **: Significant at p < 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Homayouni, H.; Razi, H.; Izadi, M.; Alemzadeh, A.; Kazemeini, S.A.; Niazi, A.; Vicente, O. Temporal Changes in Biochemical Responses to Salt Stress in Three Salicornia Species. Plants 2024, 13, 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070979

AMA Style

Homayouni H, Razi H, Izadi M, Alemzadeh A, Kazemeini SA, Niazi A, Vicente O. Temporal Changes in Biochemical Responses to Salt Stress in Three Salicornia Species. Plants. 2024; 13(7):979. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070979

Chicago/Turabian Style

Homayouni, Hengameh, Hooman Razi, Mahmoud Izadi, Abbas Alemzadeh, Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini, Ali Niazi, and Oscar Vicente. 2024. "Temporal Changes in Biochemical Responses to Salt Stress in Three Salicornia Species" Plants 13, no. 7: 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070979

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop