Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of Caffeoyl-CoA-O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT) Family Genes and the Roles of GhCCoAOMT7 in Lignin Synthesis in Cotton
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Opuntia stricta var. dillenii Extracts Obtained from Prickly Pear and an Industrial By-Product on Maturing Pre-Adipocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stimulation of Arabidopsis thaliana Seed Germination at Suboptimal Temperatures through Biopriming with Biofilm-Forming PGPR Pseudomonas putida KT2440
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Horizons in Plant–Microbe Interactions

by
Martin Cerny
1,* and
Veronika Hýsková
2,*
1
Department of Molecular Biology and Radiobiology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 2030, 12843 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(21), 2968; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212968
Submission received: 22 September 2024 / Revised: 26 September 2024 / Accepted: 14 October 2024 / Published: 24 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Horizons in Plant–Microbe Interactions)
Theophrastus, an ancient Greek philosopher known as the “Father of Botany,” was among the first to document plant diseases, establishing an understanding of plant biotic interactions some 2300 years ago. However, despite the millennia that have passed since these initial observations, our grasp of the mechanisms that govern plant–pathogen interactions remains fragmentary. This knowledge gap continues to impede our ability to develop robust strategies for mitigating the detrimental effects of pests and diseases on global agriculture. Current estimates from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) indicate that plant pests and diseases account for up to 40% of annual global crop loss [1], underscoring the urgent need for deeper insights and innovative solutions in this critical area of plant research. Our knowledge of plant–microbe interactions is constantly expanding, particularly thanks to advances in molecular biology and “omics” technologies, including transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses, all of which can be found in our Special Issue [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Thanks to advanced techniques and discoveries, the study of plant biotic interactions now extends beyond pathogenic microorganisms, pests, and herbivores that induce biotic stress, encompassing a broader range of beneficial relationships as well. This is also reflected in the composition of our Special Issue (Figure 1).
Interactions between plants and various pathogens remain among the most pressing challenges in agriculture. This Special Issue addresses one of the most devastating biotic stressors worldwide: fusarium head blight disease (FHB). FHB significantly reduces both the yield and quality of small-cereal crops like wheat and barley, while also producing mycotoxins that pose risks to global food safety [2,8]. Fiona Doohan’s team from University College Dublin discovered that the wheat NAC transcription factor TaNACL-D1 plays a crucial role in enhancing resistance to FHB. The related publication by Monika Vranić et al. [2] demonstrated that NAC overexpression led to transcriptional reprogramming and the upregulation of genes involved in hormone biosynthesis, detoxification, immune responses, secondary metabolism, and signaling, providing the putative mechanisms underlying enhanced resistance. Furthermore, their study revealed that TaNACL-D1 differentially regulates the response to jasmonic acid and abscisic acid, two hormones involved in plant stress responses. Phytohormones were also the focal point of the research article by Stephen Strelkov’s team at the University of Alberta. Jayasinghege et al. [3] profiled selected plant hormones during clubroot development in resistant and susceptible Brassica napus plants. Their results confirmed the previously described role of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene in Plasmodiophora brassicae infection, showing that abscisic acid levels strongly increased in susceptible plants, probably as a response to cope with clubroot-induced stress and interference with water uptake. These results further contributed to our understanding of hormonal balance in P. brassicae’s response. P. brassicae can persist in soil for over twenty years as resting spores [3,9], and pinpointing promising targets for promoting resistance against this pathogen is critical.
Bacterial zoonoses, such as salmonellosis, can be detected in plants and may threaten human health. A joint team from the Julius Kühn Institute and INRAE Val de Loire, led by Adam Schikora, studied the interaction between plant hosts and the human pathogen Salmonella enterica. As summarized in Han et al. [4], transcriptomics analyses compared interactions between three different S. enterica strains (a model strain isolated from poultry, a laboratory strain with attenuated virulence, and a strain without a virulence plasmid) and Solanum lycopersicum. The authors also compared these results with the available data on Arabidopsis thaliana and Lactuca sativa, showing only a limited overlap in identified pathways. These results provided a novel insight into S. enterica responses in plants, as well as a rich omics resource for future data mining.
New methods often open novel perspectives on classical experiments. Kopecká and Černý from Mendel University in Brno explored the composition of the xylem sap proteome and used this technique to analyze the response to the bacterial flagellin-derived elicitor flg22 in S. tuberosum and H. vulgare. A comparison with root and shoot proteome extracts highlighted the benefits of analyzing xylem sap, as many of the differentially abundant proteins identified were not significantly changed in the whole tissue proteome, including proteins of the HSP70 family [5].
New horizons are also revealing the beneficial interactions between soil microorganisms and plants. Such beneficial microorganisms, which serve as plant biostimulants, although applied in small quantities, release growth regulators. At the same time, they contribute to influencing the processes of soil nutrient solubilization and mineralization, improving their accessibility. It seems that, in the future, understanding these interactions will be crucial for environmentally friendly and sustainable crop production. The research team from the University of Copenhagen, led by Chandana Pandey, studied the potential beneficial effect of seed biopriming with biofilm-forming plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on seed germination under suboptimal conditions. The interactions between four strains of PGPR from the Pseudomonas and Bacillus genera, including mutant Pseudomonas putida with its compromised biofilm-forming ability, and nine various accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana were studied. The results summarized in Pandey et al. [6] showed that biofilm-forming PGPR strains hold potential for future agricultural use due to their ability to promote plant germination and resilience against environmental stresses.
HC-Pro, a potyvirus cysteine-type protease, plays a crucial role in various stages of the viral life cycle beyond polyprotein cleavage. A joint team from Charles University and the Czech Academy of Sciences, led by Helena Ryšlavá, reviewed the state of the art in research of this interesting protein. HC-Pro aids in aphid transmission, suppresses plant defenses, and facilitates virus spread. While not typically associated with cleaving host proteins, HC-Pro has been shown to interact with several of them, potentially modulating the cellular environment to benefit the virus. Interestingly, plants have evolved mechanisms to counter HC-Pro’s effects through interactions with plant proteins. For more details and insights into these interactions, explore the review by Hýsková et al. [7].
This Special Issue covered a wide range of biotic interactions and provided new insights and ideas on how we can protect plants against biotic stress in the future. We extend our sincere gratitude to all the authors for their valuable contributions to this collection. We hope that the presented articles will serve as a rich source of knowledge, inspiration, and fresh perspectives on plant–microbe interactions for both authors and readers alike.

Author Contributions

M.C. and V.H. wrote this Editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: www.fao.org (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  2. Vranić, M.; Perochon, A.; Doohan, F.M. Transcriptional Profiling Reveals the Wheat Defences against Fusarium Head Blight Disease Regulated by a NAC Transcription Factor. Plants 2023, 12, 2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jayasinghege, C.P.A.; Ozga, J.A.; Manolii, V.P.; Hwang, S.-F.; Strelkov, S.E. Impact of Susceptibility on Plant Hormonal Composition during Clubroot Disease Development in Canola (Brassica napus). Plants 2023, 12, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Han, M.; Zarkani, A.A.; Duan, Y.; Grimm, M.; Trotereau, J.; Virlogeux-Payant, I.; Schikora, A. Bidirectional Comparisons Revealed Functional Patterns in Interaction between Salmonella enterica and Plants. Plants 2024, 13, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kopecká, R.; Černý, M. Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis Provides Insight into Root–Shoot Communication in Response to Flg22. Plants 2024, 13, 1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pandey, C.; Christensen, A.; Jensen, M.N.P.B.; Rechnagel, E.R.; Gram, K.; Roitsch, T. Stimulation of Arabidopsis thaliana Seed Germination at Suboptimal Temperatures through Biopriming with Biofilm-Forming PGPR Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Plants 2024, 13, 2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hýsková, V.; Bělonožníková, K.; Chmelík, J.; Hoffmeisterová, H.; Čeřovská, N.; Moravec, T.; Ryšlavá, H. Potyviral Helper-Component Protease: Multifaced Functions and Interactions with Host Proteins. Plants 2024, 13, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Matengu, T.T.; Bullock, P.R.; Mkhabela, M.S.; Zvomuya, F.; Henriquez, M.A.; Ojo, E.R.; Fernando, W.G.D. Weather-based Models for Forecasting Fusarium head blight Risks in Wheat and Barley: A Review. Plant Pathol. 2024, 73, 492–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saharan, G.S.; Mehta, N.K.; Meena, P.D. The Disease: Clubroot. In Clubroot Disease of Crucifers; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 47–85. ISBN 9789811621321. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Overview of the diverse plant–microbe interactions explored in this Special Issue. The word cloud within the chart provides a visual representation of the most frequently occurring keywords found in the abstracts.
Figure 1. Overview of the diverse plant–microbe interactions explored in this Special Issue. The word cloud within the chart provides a visual representation of the most frequently occurring keywords found in the abstracts.
Plants 13 02968 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cerny, M.; Hýsková, V. New Horizons in Plant–Microbe Interactions. Plants 2024, 13, 2968. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212968

AMA Style

Cerny M, Hýsková V. New Horizons in Plant–Microbe Interactions. Plants. 2024; 13(21):2968. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cerny, Martin, and Veronika Hýsková. 2024. "New Horizons in Plant–Microbe Interactions" Plants 13, no. 21: 2968. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212968

APA Style

Cerny, M., & Hýsková, V. (2024). New Horizons in Plant–Microbe Interactions. Plants, 13(21), 2968. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212968

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop