Next Article in Journal
Moving Away from 12:12; the Effect of Different Photoperiods on Biomass Yield and Cannabinoids in Medicinal Cannabis
Previous Article in Journal
Alternative Plant Vitrification Solution A3-80% and Initial Ammonium-Free Regrowth Medium Enable Cryobanking of Chrysanthemum Germplasm
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Tree Decline Varies the Anatomical Features in Quercus brantii
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Forest Ecophysiology: Stress Response and Ecophysiological Indicators of Tree Vitality

Croatian Forest Research Institute, Division of Forest Ecology, Cvjetno naselje 41, 10450 Jastrebarsko, Croatia
Plants 2023, 12(5), 1063; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051063
Submission received: 3 February 2023 / Revised: 21 February 2023 / Accepted: 22 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
Back in the beginning of the year 2021, when the work on this Special Issue started, it was quite clear that the topics of tree stress response and the ecophysiological indicators of tree vitality were both current and important, but the attitude of the scientific community towards the idea of a Special Issue on the subject was yet to be determined. Now that we are closing the first, and already preparing the second volume, I am very happy to definitely confirm your high interest.
Air pollution and the changing climate are some of the greatest threats to the health and functioning of forest ecosystems, strongly jeopardizing their ecological and economic functions as well as services. The impact of increasing temperatures and extreme weather events (droughts, storms, temperature and precipitation extremes) on the vitality of forest trees is often difficult to separate from the impact of pollution, such as nitrogen deposition and tropospheric ozone, as they can exhibit synergistic effects. For example, forest soil acidification, atmospheric N deposition, and climate change are all partly responsible for the continuous decrease in foliar P concentrations in Europe, causing reduced tree growth [1,2]. The use of indicators is elementary in modern forest ecophysiological research, as they help us to disentangle complex interactions between trees and various stress-inducing factors as well as better estimate the level of damage to trees and forest ecosystems.
The initial Special Issue framework, as defined by the title and suggested topics of interest, has been broadened in the process thanks to your valuable submissions, adding terms such as heavy metals, carbon isotopes, water use efficiency, polyamines, antioxidants, or plant hormones to the list of subjects which already included photosynthetic activity and other biochemical stress indicators; nutrients in different tree compartments; tree growth; tree leaf loss and mortality; visible symptoms of stress in foliage; and microscopical markers of stress. All of these terms share one common trait: they have an important role in measuring and assessing tree stress in the context of the great ecological challenges of today.
Eleven papers are included in this Special Issue, with wide-ranging topics from various disciplines but centered around tree response to environmental stress. In line with the current trends in environmental research, climate takes clear precedence over pollution, and as many as nine of the articles discuss climate effects; tree anatomy, growth, nutrition, foliar injury, the level of antioxidants, and defoliation are used as response variables.
Three papers, by Levanič and Štraus [3], Sensuła and Wilczyński [4], and Popa et al. [5], discuss the effects of climate on tree growth, and the paper by Sensuła and Wilczyński [4] also includes the effects on water use efficiency and carbon isotopes’ composition. Two papers, one by Ognjenović et al. [6] and another by Češljar et al. [7], focus on climate effects on tree crown defoliation. While the first paper tests the differences between defoliation and defoliation change as long-term and short-term indicators, respectively, of tree vitality, the second paper discusses the links between crown defoliation and tree mortality. Defoliation is again featured in the paper by Ognjenović et al. [8], where its effect on the nutritional response of beech trees to climate and stand factors is discussed. Soheili et al. [9] investigate how cell anatomical structure is affected by drought stress. Nutrition, oxidative stress, and defoliation in four Mediterranean tree species are the focus of the paper by Lovreškov et al. [10], while Kebert et al. [11] discuss species-level differences in osmoprotectants and antioxidants under water deficit and high temperatures. Despite the prevalence of interest in climate effects, pollution-oriented papers are not less exciting: tree responses to heavy-metal-induced stress are the subject of a paper by Kebert et al. [12], and the effects of ozone and drought on oak seedlings are discussed by Baesso Moura et al. [13]. The latter paper also nicely underlines the fact that climate and pollution effects on trees, although often investigated separately, are in practice often related and intertwined.
In conclusion, the task of this Special Issue is twofold: one, to remind us that a better understanding of the physiological processes influencing tree vitality under the changing climate and air pollution pressures requires considerable research efforts and constant advancements in research methods and approaches; two, to highlight the fact that the environmental pressures instigating the use of tree stress response indicators are more present than ever, and will likely continue to affect tree vitality in the foreseeable future.
As the Guest Editor of this Special Issue, I would like to use the opportunity to thank all of the authors for their valuable submissions, their dedicated and hard work, and the continuous exchange of thoughts and ideas that form the backbone of current scientific research, pushing it ever further.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jonard, M.; Fürst, A.; Verstraeten, A.; Thimonier, A.; Timmermann, V.; Potočić, N.; Waldner, P.; Benham, S.; Hansen, K.; Merilä, P.; et al. Tree Mineral Nutrition Is Deteriorating in Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 418–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Talkner, U.; Meiwes, K.J.; Potočić, N.; Seletković, I.; Cools, N.; De Vos, B.; Rautio, P. Phosphorus Nutrition of Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Is Decreasing in Europe. Ann. For. Sci. 2015, 72, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Levanič, T.; Štraus, H. Effects of Climate on Douglas-Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) Growth Southeast of the European Alps. Plants 2022, 11, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sensuła, B.; Wilczyński, S. Dynamics Changes in Basal Area Increment, Carbon Isotopes Composition and Water Use Efficiency in Pine as Response to Water and Heat Stress in Silesia, Poland. Plants 2022, 11, 3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Popa, A.; Popa, I.; Roibu, C.C.; Badea, O.N. Do Different Tree-Ring Proxies Contain Different Temperature Signals? A Case Study of Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) in the Eastern Carpathians. Plants 2022, 11, 2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ognjenović, M.; Seletković, I.; Potočić, N.; Marušić, M.; Tadić, M.P.; Jonard, M.; Rautio, P.; Timmermann, V.; Lovreškov, L.; Ugarković, D. Defoliation Change of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Depends on Previous Year Drought. Plants 2022, 11, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Češljar, G.; Jovanović, F.; Brašanac-Bosanac, L.; Ðorđević, I.; Mitrović, S.; Eremija, S.; Ćirković-Mitrović, T.; Lučić, A. Impact of an Extremely Dry Period on Tree Defoliation and Tree Mortality in Serbia. Plants 2022, 11, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ognjenović, M.; Seletković, I.; Marušić, M.; Jonard, M.; Rautio, P.; Timmermann, V.; Tadić, M.P.; Lanšćak, M.; Ugarković, D.; Potočić, N. The Effect of Environmental Factors on the Nutrition of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Varies with Defoliation. Plants 2023, 12, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Soheili, F.; Abdul-Hamid, H.; Almasi, I.; Heydari, M.; Tongo, A.; Woodward, S.; Naji, H.R. How Tree Decline Varies the Anatomical Features in Quercus Brantii. Plants 2023, 12, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lovreškov, L.; Radojčić Redovniković, I.; Limić, I.; Potočić, N.; Seletković, I.; Marušić, M.; Jurinjak Tušek, A.; Jakovljević, T.; Butorac, L. Are Foliar Nutrition Status and Indicators of Oxidative Stress Associated with Tree Defoliation of Four Mediterranean Forest Species? Plants 2022, 11, 3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kebert, M.; Vuksanović, V.; Stefels, J.; Bojović, M.; Horák, R.; Kostić, S.; Kovačević, B.; Orlović, S.; Neri, L.; Magli, M.; et al. Species-Level Differences in Osmoprotectants and Antioxidants Contribute to Stress Tolerance of Quercus robur L., and Q. cerris L. Seedlings under Water Deficit and High Temperatures. Plants 2022, 11, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kebert, M.; Kostić, S.; Vuksanović, V.; Gavranović Markić, A.; Kiprovski, B.; Zorić, M.; Orlović, S. Metal- and Organ-Specific Response to Heavy Metal-Induced Stress Mediated by Antioxidant Enzymes’ Activities, Polyamines, and Plant Hormones Levels in Populus Deltoides. Plants 2022, 11, 3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Moura, B.B.; Paoletti, E.; Badea, O.; Ferrini, F.; Hoshika, Y. Visible Foliar Injury and Ecophysiological Responses to Ozone and Drought in Oak Seedlings. Plants 2022, 11, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Potočić, N. Advances in Forest Ecophysiology: Stress Response and Ecophysiological Indicators of Tree Vitality. Plants 2023, 12, 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051063

AMA Style

Potočić N. Advances in Forest Ecophysiology: Stress Response and Ecophysiological Indicators of Tree Vitality. Plants. 2023; 12(5):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Potočić, Nenad. 2023. "Advances in Forest Ecophysiology: Stress Response and Ecophysiological Indicators of Tree Vitality" Plants 12, no. 5: 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop