Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of the CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing System in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Using the Endogenous U6 Promoter
Previous Article in Journal
Temperature Dependence of Metals Accumulation and Removal Kinetics by Arabidopsis halleri ssp. gemmifera
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/plants12040875
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Gonostegia hirta: An Underexploited, Potentially Edible, Wild Plant

by
Yaochen Li
1,†,
Zheng Hu
1,†,
Xiaoqi Chen
1,2,
Biao Zhu
1,
Tingfu Liu
3,* and
Jing Yang
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2
School of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China
3
Lishui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lishui 323000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(4), 875; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040875
Submission received: 18 January 2023 / Revised: 3 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Wild, edible plants have received increasing attention as an important complement to cultivate vegetables, as they represent an easily accessible source of nutrients, mineral elements, and antioxidants. In this study, the tender stems and leaves of Gonostegia hirta, an edible species for which only scarce data are available in the literature, are thoroughly evaluated for their nutritional profile, chemical characterization, and antioxidant activity. Being considered as an underexploited, potentially edible plant, the nutritional composition of Gonostegia hirta was identified, and several beneficial compounds were highlighted: sugars, potassium, calcium, organic acids, fatty acids, phenolics, and flavonoids. A total of 418 compounds were identified by metabolomic analysis, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, amino acids, lipids, organic acids, terpenoids, alkaloids, nucleotides, tannins, lignans, and coumarin. The plant sample was found to have good antioxidant capacities, presented by DPPH, FRAP, ABTS+, hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity, and its resistance to the superoxide anion radical test. In general, Gonostegia hirta has a good nutritional and phytochemical composition. The health benefits of Gonostegia hirta as a vegetable and herbal medicine is important for both a modern diet and use in medication.

1. Introduction

Wild, edible plants are an important plant resource, not only as an inexpensive source of nutrients, vitamins, antioxidants, and functional ingredients because of their nutritional potential, but also as a cultural heritage practice that should be preserved. In some less-developed regions and economically disadvantaged areas in the world, wild, edible plants are still traditionally consumed and play an important role in the diet of local populations.
Globally, about 30,000 edible plant species are recorded at present; however, only about 0.5% of them are widely grown [1]. The disappearance of many wild, edible plant species has been exacerbated by an over-reliance on high-yielding and genetically consistent crops. This has led to a monoculture of edible plants that can be grown on a large scale and can be put into production [2]. To date, global agriculture products do not seem to be sufficient enough to meet human’s nutritional needs. Meanwhile, wild, edible plant species that can be collected from the wild or grown using traditional methods can potentially play a role in diversifying diets and combating “hidden hunger” caused by micronutrient deficiencies [3]. In recent years, wild, edible plants have not only received further attention from the scientific community, with many wild, edible plants being discovered, documented, and studied for their chemical and functional properties, but also from the food industry and consumers, who are increasingly interested in sustainable and healthy foods. In addition, in some countries and regions, such as Europe, Japan, and China, local-specialty wild plants are transformed into various products, dishes, and skin care products as cultural promotion and exchange practices, while also seeking their health benefits.
Gonostegia hirta is a perennial herb of the family Urticaceae, and is a common Chinese medicinal product and wild, edible vegetable. On the one hand, Gonostegia hirta is an ethnic medicine commonly used in the treatment of stomachaches, bleeding, and mastitis [4]. A few studies have shown that Gonostegia hirta contains flavonoids, phenols, organic acids, polysaccharides, and other bioactive substances, while flavonoids, phenols, and organic acids have strong antioxidant properties [5,6]. An ethnobotanical survey of wild plants was conducted by Hong et al. [7] and indicted that Gonostegia hirta is useful as a traditional medicinal herb, and it also can be consumed as herbal tea after being dried, which has the effect of clearing heat and detoxifying the body, spleen tonic, digestion, and removing dampness.
On the other hand, Gonostegia hirta is also often used as an edible, wild plant. Of the different parts of Gonostegia hirta that may have a nutritional value (the leaves, young stems, and roots), the leaves and young stems are the most frequently consumed parts. These leaves and young stems can be eaten in stir-fries, cooked in soups, or made into dumplings. Although it is worthy of being noticed as both a nutritional source and traditional medicine plant, the relevant research focusing on the chemical characterization of Gonostegia hirta is still inadequate, and few reports have been conducted on its nutritional composition. The present study has four main objectives concerning the nutritional value and chemical characteristics of Gonostegia hirta: (1) to characterize the main nutritional values obtained from moisture, crude fat, soluble sugars, fatty acids, amino acids, minerals, and organic acids; (2) to evaluate the safety concerning the total content of potentially toxic and toxic elements and total saponins; (3) to evaluate antioxidant and potential functional properties through chemical content and metabolomics analysis; and (4) to comprehensively evaluate the nutritional, flavor, and functional values to meet the needs of healthy, vegetable diets to provide a basis for the development and utilization of Gonostegia hirta.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Composition

2.1.1. Moisture and Crude Fat

Table 1 shows that the moisture content of Gonostegia hirta, 50.84%, and its crude fat content, 2.57%. The fat content of vegetables is usually very low; therefore, the low-fat content observed in Gonostegia hirta supports this fact.

2.1.2. Minerals and Potentially Toxic Elements

As shown in Table 1, the highest amounts of minerals observed in Gonostegia hirta are potassium (K), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and magnesium (Mg). Their contents were 3855.22, 1352.49, 569.51, and 284.35 mg/100 g of dry weight (DW), respectively. K is an essential nutrient that contributes to maintain total body fluid, acid and electrolyte balance, and normal cell function. Increasing K intake may be beneficial for most people in preventing and controlling elevated blood pressure levels and strokes [8]. Ca is also important for controlling blood pressure and promoting bone and tooth growth [9]. P plays a vital role in energy generation, human growth and development, and also provides the structural framework for DNA and RNA [10]. It also functions in regulating blood sugar levels [11]. Mg has numerous functions, including cell signaling and energy production, and it is also an important mineral in bones, cell membranes, and chromosomes [9]. The content of Ca and Mg in Gonostegia hirta is much higher than in some cultivated vegetables. For example, the Ca content in Gonostegia hirta was 5.12- and 22.24-times higher than in cassava leaves and chicory [12,13], respectively, and the Mg content in Gonostegia hirta was 7.10-, 5.10-, and 9.38-times higher than in chicory, green lettuce, and Swiss chard, respectively [13]. It has been suggested that Gonostegia hirta could act as an important supplement for calcium and magnesium. Zinc (Zn) has many roles in the body, including immune function, growth and development, nerve function, vision, and fertility [9]. Compared to spinach (7.95 mg/100 g DW) [14] and amaranth (3.7 mg/100 g DW) [12], Gonostegia hirta also has a higher Zn content (10.47 mg/100 g DW). However, it is important to note that the excessive consumption of zinc (estimated dose of 325–650 mg) is dangerous to human health [15]. Minerals, such as K, Ca, Mg, P, and Zn, are crucial for normal body development and maintenance. The results indicate that Gonostegia hirta is rich in these essential minerals, of which Fe, Zn, Ca, Mg, and Cu are some of the most commonly deficient mineral elements in the human diet [11]; thus, Gonostegia hirta seems to be a multifaceted supplement for these elements in the human body.
The contents of cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and chromium (Cr) were also measured to evaluate the safety of Gonostegia hirta, and the results show the Cd, Pb, and Cr contents in Gonostegia hirta are within the safe range, according to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1317, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, and Chinese National Food Safety Standard for Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods (GB 2762-2017). In general, Gonostegia hirta is less contaminated by potentially toxic and toxic elements; however, it might also be associated with the local climate, soil, and ecological environment, and should not be picked in contaminated areas, such as areas with developed industries, high traffic pollution, and high sewage discharge [16].

2.1.3. Soluble Sugars and Organic Acids

In general, monosaccharides are easily digested and absorbed by the human body; therefore, they are thought to have a high nutritional value [17]. Three types of soluble sugars were measured in Gonostegia hirta, namely, sucrose, glucose, and fructose. Among these, fructose has the highest value, accounting for 46.71% of the total (Table 1), and is sweeter and tastier than sucrose and glucose [18]. The total soluble sugar content of Gonostegia hirta is 87.03 mg/g, which higher than lettuce (7.72 to 16.24 mg/g DW) [19] and very close to soybean (84.70 to 140.91 mg/g) [20].
Organic acids affect a number of characteristics of vegetables, such as flavor, aroma, and appearance [21]. The most abundant organic acid detected in Gonostegia hirta was citric acid (22.5 mg/g DW), followed by tartaric (10.68 mg/g DW), oxalic (3.4 mg/g DW), and ascorbic (1.30 mg/g DW) acids (Table 1). Among these, citric acid is an important organic acid with a strong, sour taste, is easily soluble in water, and is a natural preservative [22], while tartaric acid is a natural antioxidant and flavorant in foods [23]. Moreover, oxalic acid easily combines with mineral elements to form insoluble oxalate, and vegetables with a high oxalic acid content can be consumed in large quantities with a distinct bitter taste and may cause hyperoxaluria and kidney stones [24,25]. Gonostegia hirta contains slightly higher oxalic acid levels than lettuce (1.16 to 1.67 mg/g DW) [18], but less than conventional spinach (about 8 to 12.5 mg/g) [26]. Thus, it is recommended to blanch Gonostegia hirta to reduce the bitterness caused by oxalic acid when consuming it. In addition, Gonostegia hirta has a higher ascorbic acid content compared to spinach and chicory, and the ascorbic acid levels are 0.52 mg/g of fresh weight (FW) and 0.30 mg/g FW [13]. Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is considered one of the most powerful and least toxic, natural antioxidants, which has been shown to be effective against superoxide radical anions, H2O2, hydroxyl radicals, and singlet oxygen [27].
In total, 27 organic acid species were detected by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC)—tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), accounting for 6.46% of 418 metabolites in total (Figure 1 and Table S1). Some of these organic acids are thought to have unique functions, such as succinic acid (SA), mangiferic acid, and kynurenic acid (KYNA). SA is an important metabolite that has been shown to be involved in promoting energy expenditure and fighting obesity [28]. Mangiferic acid can promote human skin regeneration, and it is expected to be used as a new material in skin regeneration biotherapy or cosmetics in the future [29]. KYNA is a metabolite of kynurenine, which has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and pain-relieving properties [30].

2.1.4. Amino Acid

Amino acid (AA) composition is a reliable indicator of the nutritional value of food and is traditionally classified as essential amino acids (EAAs) and non-essential amino acids (NEAAs). As shown in Table 2 and Figure 2, 17 amino acids were detected in Gonostegia hirta, and 8 of them present EAAs, namely, isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu), methionine (Met), lysine (Lys), valine (Val), threonine (Thr), phenylalanine (Phe), and histidine (His), which have an important effect on the nutritional quality of plant-based products. His has the highest content (0.091 mg/g DW), followed by Thr (0.033 mg/g) and Val (0.020 mg/g DW). The content of Met in Gonostegia hirta is 0.015 mg/g DW, and it is a sulfur-containing amino acid that is essential for cellular metabolism and protein uptake. In addition, aspartic acid (Asp) is the most abundant of all 17 amino acids, which may contribute to the fresh taste of Gonostegia hirta.
The content and ratio of individual amino acids are also related to the flavor of the plant. For example, Asp and glutamic acid (Glu) are thought to be significant contributors to the fresh flavor [30], which accounts for 32.06% of total amino acids in Gonostegia hirta. At the same time, the proportion of sweet amino acids (Thr + Ser + Gly + Ala + Lys + Pro) [31] was 26.22%; the proportion of bitter amino acids (Val + Met + Ile + Leu + Phe + His + Arg) [31] was 20.63%. The results show that the content of bitter amino acids is lower than sweet and fresh amino acids, indicating that the palatability of Gonostegia hirta might be relatively good. In addition, some amino acids are considered as medicinal amino acids, including Asp, Glu, Gly, Met, Leu, Tyr, Phe, Lys, and Arg [31], which account for 62.19% of the total amino acids in Gonostegia hirta. For example, Tyr may improve cognitive ability for human adults, while Arg has a beneficial effect on the regulation of nutrient metabolism to enhance lean tissue deposition and insulin resistance in humans [32,33]. Additionally, those two compounds had the highest levels of all medicinal amino acids.
Some amino acid derivatives were also detected by UPLC-MS/MS, such as trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline (Hyp), N-Acetylneuraminic acid (NANA), L-theanine, proline betaine, and pipecolic acid (Table S1). These amino acid derivatives have different roles in the growth and metabolism of plants, medicinal functions, etc. For example, Hyp is a useful chiral building block for the production of many nutritional supplements and drugs [34]. NANA consumes toxic hydrogen peroxide under physiological conditions and may serve as an intrinsic antioxidant in the future [35]. L-theanine is known to be an amino acid unique to tea, and has positive effects on relaxation, cognitive performance, emotional state, sleep quality, cancer, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and the common cold [36].

2.1.5. Fatty Acid

The composition of fatty acids has a significant impact on mammalian health. For example, some saturated fatty acids (SFAs) have been reported to exhibit deleterious effects, while the intake of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) reduced the risk of cardiovascular and other metabolic diseases, thereby improving one’s lifespan [37]. Therefore, lipid composition is critical for evaluating the quality of wild, edible plants. The fatty acid profile of Gonostegia hirta is shown in Table 3, evidencing that a total of 16 fatty acids can be identified (Figure 3). The two major compounds are the essential fatty acids linolenic and linoleic acids, with SFAs accounting for about 27.4% and PUFAs accounting for about 72.6%. In the samples, PUFAs were the major group, with ω-3 fatty acids accounting for 31% of total fatty acids. Previous studies suggested that a higher intake of ω-3 may protect us from inflammatory diseases, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic diseases [38]. It has been reported that the optimal intake ratio of ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acids is 1~2/1 [39], and the ratio of ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids in Gonostegia hirta is 1.32/1, which means the consumption of Gonostegia hirta could possibly be beneficial for our health.
Except for the 16 fatty acids mentioned above, more fatty acids were detected by UPLC-MS/MS, and some of them, such as elaidic and punic acids, serve many important roles. Ohmori et al. observed that elaidic acid may provide significant metastatic potential for colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, which has important implications for the treatment of CRC [40]. Punicic acid has great potential as an antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and natural healing agent for inflammatory diseases [41]. In addition to these fatty acids, we also found a phosphatidylcholine called choline alfoscerate; it is a common choline compound and acetylcholine precursor in the brain that has been shown to be effective in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia [42].

2.1.6. TP (Total Phenols), TF (Total Flavonoids), and TS (Total Saponins)

Phenols are widely distributed in nature and their anti-microbial, anti-bacterial, antioxidant, pharmacological, and nutritional properties have been widely recognized [43]. The TP content of Gonostegia hirta was determined (Table 4). The result indicates that Gonostegia hirta is a good source of phenolics (TP: 1.20 ± 0.10 mg GAE/g DW), with an amount 2.43-times higher than spinach (0.493 mg GAE/g DW) and 5.53-times higher than green lettuce (0.217 mg GAE/g) [13]. However, the result in this study is lower than that of Wong et al. (5.6 and 5.3 mg GAE/g DW for leaves and stems, respectively) [5]. The reason for the discrepancy may be due to the plant development stage, picking regions, and extraction methods. In addition, 47 phenolic acid compounds were found by UPLC-MS/MS, accounting for 11.24% of the total (Figure 1). p-Coumaric, ferulic, caffeic, chlorogenic, and coumaric acids were included, which received a lot of attention in the previous study, and are considered to have a variety of active functions [44]. For example, extensive studies have shown that p-Coumaric acid (especially the p-CA adduct) presents a variety of biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-platelet, and anti-cancer activities, as well as reducing atherosclerosis, various tissue damage, neuronal damage, gout, and diabetes [45]. Ferulic acid has a good antioxidant capacity due to the presence of phenolic hydroxyl groups with a hydrogen-donating capacity [46]. The synergistic effect of these substances provides a certain basis for the potential biological activity of Gonostegia hirta.
The TF content in Gonostegia hirta was also measured in the present study, and a value of 76.49 ± 5.58 mg/g was obtained, which is 2.85-times higher than that of Brassica juncea [47]. To date, more than 6000 flavonoids have been identified, and their basic functions in plants include regulating growth and providing protection against pathogens. Because of their antioxidant, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral activities, they have attracted considerable interest [48]. Flavonoids were the most diverse of the 418 identified metabolites, accounting for 31.58% (Figure 1). The flavonoids identified can be divided into ten main groups, as shown in Figure 1. Quercetin, kaempferol, popcornin, apigenin, and lignan are the five most prevalent plant flavonoids, which were all detected in Gonostegia hirta. Apigenin has low toxicity and multiple beneficial bioactivities, such as anti-cancer and antibacterial effects [49,50], and received a considerable attention. Lignans, quercetin, prunetin, and kaempferol have also shown strong anti-cancer effects in various tests [51,52]. In this study, kaempferol, quercetin, isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside, and kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside were detected, and this is consistent with the results of Lei et al. [53].
Saponins are sugar-conjugated natural compounds with a variety of biological properties, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory [54]. Nevertheless, it has been shown that high doses of saponins can cause damage to the liver [55]. A TS content of 60.30 ± 0.66 mg/g was detected in Gonostegia hirta, and suggested that the value was within the range compared to Aralia elata (38.37 to 104.31 mg/g DW) [56]. The metabolites of Gonostegia hirta were detected by UPLC-MS/MS and three terpenoids were identified, including soyasapogenol B, 3, 24-Dihydroxy-17, 21-semiacetal-12(13), oleanolic fruit, and 2-Hydroxyoleanolic acid (Table S1). Of the abovementioned compounds, only soyasapogenol B belongs to triterpene saponins, which have also been shown to have a good ability to inhibit the proliferation of human liver cancer cells [57].

2.1.7. Alkaloids

Alkaloids are the main chemical constituents and the basis of medicinal substances in many medicinal plants, and some alkaloid components are also the main substance basis for the toxicity of plants [58]. The present study detected 23 alkaloids (Table S1), among which trigonelline, betaine, and caffeine are thought to be the most important substances. Trigonelline has a bitter taste and has been reported to have hypolipidemic, antiviral, central nervous system therapeutic, and memory-retention effects [59,60]. Although some studies suggest it has low toxicity levels, Mishkinsky et al. reported that oral and subcutaneous LD50 of trigonelline in rats of was ≈ 5000 mg/kg, and no mice died during the experiment, even when 50 mg/kg of fenugreek was fed to them for 21 days. Therefore, it is safe to consume vegetables that contain trigonelline, such as Gonostegia hirta, in moderation [61]. Some studies have shown that betaine has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and is also beneficial to alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress, and therefore contributes to improve insulin sensitivity and better glucose clearance, with a greater potential to fight diabetes [62]. Caffeine is naturally found in various foods, such as coffee, tea, and cocoa, and has also been detected in Gonostegia hirta. Caffeine is used in cosmetics for its high antioxidant capacity and ability to penetrate the skin barrier [63], and it is often used as a stimulant [64]. An allergen was also detected, namely, cocamidopropyl betaine, which is mainly used as a surfactant in cosmetics, and it may cause a skin allergy on the head and neck. Thus, the subsequent use of Gonostegia hirta requires attention [65,66]. The types of alkaloids present in Gonostegia hirta can also be divided into phenolamine and indole alkaloids, the more useful of which is spermine, which has been shown to be associated with the development of various human cancers and can be used as a diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tool for various cancers [67].

2.2. Antioxidation Capacity Analysis

To date, only a few studies have been conducted on the antioxidant properties of Gonostegia hirta. The values of the DPPH and ABTS+ scavenging capacities of Gonostegia hirta were 5.92 and 68.82 mg/g, respectively (Table 5). Additionally, the values are much higher than for cabbage (1.04 mg/g DW and 0.28 mg/g FW) [68,69]. However, the ferric-reducing power (62.23 μmol/L) of Gonostegia hirta is less than for cabbage (53.01 μmol/g) [68]. This may be due to the differences in antioxidant capacity-determination methods. The scavenging ability of DPPH and ABTS radicals is based on a combination of hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and single electron transfer (SET) mechanisms, whereas FRAP is based on a SET mechanism, and the whole reaction does not involve free radicals, but only electron transfer ability. This may lead to the difference in the ability reflected by FRAP, compared to the other two components [70].
In addition, ABTS radicals are soluble in water, and organic solvents and are mainly used to determine the antioxidant capacity of lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds (e.g., vitamin C, vitamin E, phenolic compounds, and anthocyanins). However, DPPH radicals are insoluble in water and are usually soluble in methanol, ethanol, or their aqueous mixtures (water content should not exceed 60%), and the antioxidant capacity of scavenging DPPH radicals is correlated with phenolic acids and flavonoids [70].
Therefore, we speculated that the DPPH and ABTS+ scavenging abilities of Gonostegia hirta may be related to the abundant phenolic substances, such as caffeic acid, ferulic acid, p-coumarins, and quercetin, which are thought to have high free-radical scavenging capacities, all of which were detected in Gonostegia hirta [71,72,73]. Compared to some common vegetables [13,47], Gonostegia hirta has higher TP and TF levels. In general, the higher the content of TP and TF, the greater the antioxidant activity shown by the plant [74], which may also indicate its good antioxidant capacity. In addition, the presence of ascorbic acid also significantly contributes to the antioxidant capacity of plants. We can also observe, compared to other studies, the ascorbic acid content of Gonostegia hirta is also much higher than that of some other vegetables, such as spanich, chicory, and green lettuce [13,26]. It is suggested that the antioxidant capacity of Gonostegia hirta might be better and could contain more substances with an antioxidant activity. The chemical composition of the plant significantly changes with its growth and development, which can be some of the reasons for the difference in its chemical composition, compared to other vegetables.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Gonostegia hirta was obtained from Li Shui, Zhejiang province (27°25′ N~28°57′ N, 118°41′ E~120°26′ E) on 19 July 2019. Fresh stems and leaves were washed with ionized water, freeze-dried, crushed, and then stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

3.2. Chemical Composition Measurement

3.2.1. Moisture

The samples were cleaned and weighed (W1), then freeze-dried for 72 h and weighed again (W2), and the moisture percentage was calculated as:
Moisure   % = W 1 − W 2 W 1 × 100

3.2.2. Crude Fat

Crude fat was determined as previously described by Xu. [75]. Fatty acids in the sample were extracted with 10 mL of hexane (1.0 g sample) (W1). The leaves were sonicated in a water bath at 42 °C for 10 min, centrifuged, and filtered. A total of 3 extractions were performed. The combined extracts were rotary evaporated and oven dried at 60 °C to a constant weight (W2), and the crude fat percentage was calculated as:
Crude   fat   % = W 2 W 1 × 100

3.2.3. Minerals and Potentially Toxic Elements

The elements were determined as previously described by Yang et al. [76]. Briefly, the freeze-dried powder (0.50 g) was digested with concentrated HNO3, fixed with water to 50 mL, and analyzed for minerals with a Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES). We used an IRIS/AP-ICP (TJA, Dartmouth, MA, USA) instrument and the ICP-OES procedure mainly referenced the “Food National Standard for Determination of Multi-element in Food” (GB 5009. 268-2016).

3.2.4. Soluble Sugar

Soluble sugars were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a refraction index detector (HPLC–RID), mainly referring to the method of Yao [77]. The samples were extracted (0.1000 g) with 6 mL of ultrapure water in a water bath at 65 °C for 20 min. The extraction solution was filtered by a 0.45 μm microporous filter prior for analysis.
A sample of 5 μL was analyzed in an Agilent 1200 HPLC system equipped with a differential refractive index detector, using a Waters sugar-Pak I column WAT084038 (6.5 × 300 mm, 10 µm). The column temperature was maintained at 85 °C at a rate of 0.8 mL/min, and the mobile phase was ultrapure water. The contents of glucose, sucrose, and fructose in the samples were calculated according to the standard curves drawn from the results of the injection.

3.2.5. Organic Acid

Reducing the organic acid was determined according to the method described by Song et al. [78]. The extract was obtained by passing 0.2000 g of sample and 10 mL of KH2PO4-H3PO4 buffer solution (0.02 mol/L, pH = 2.9) in a water bath at 75 °C for 1 h. The extraction solution was filtered by a 0.45 μm microporous filter prior for analysis. The results are expressed as mg per g of plant DW.
The samples were analyzed on an Agilent 1200 HPLC system equipped with a DAD detector using column InertSustain C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase was KH2PO4-H3PO4 at a rate of 0.8 mL/min. The contents of oxalic, tartaric, ascorbic, and citric acids in the samples were calculated from the standard curves drawn from the injection results.

3.2.6. Amino Acid

The extracts were prepared using 0.1000 g of sample and 5 mL of ultrapure water. The samples were extracted in an ultrasonic bath at room temperature for 60 min. The extract was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter, and then stored at 4 °C prior to analysis.
A total of 10 μL of sample solution, 70 μL of AccQ buffer, and 20 μL of derivatives were mixed for 15 s and heated in an oven at 55 °C for 10 min. The samples were then analyzed using the AccQ Tag system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) by Waters Arc HPLC with an AccQ TagTM amino acid column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The rate was 1 mL/min. Mobile phase A was AccQ-Tag A solution diluted at 1:10 (v/v) with ultrapure water, mobile phase B was acetonitrile, and mobile phase C was ultrapure water. The content of each amino acid quantity in the sample was calculated from the standard curve drawn from the injection results.

3.2.7. Fatty Acid

Fatty acids were determined as previously described by Xu. [75], and GC-MS methods mainly referenced the “Food National Standard for Safety Determination of Fatty Acids in Foods” (GB 5009.168-2016). The extracts (Section 3.2.2) were 2 mL of hexane and 20 μL of undecanoic acid standard (1 mg/mL), mixed and analyzed by GC-MS (GCMS-QP2010 SE, SHIMADZU) after methylation with the KOH-CH3OH and H2SO4—CH3OH solutions.

3.2.8. Total Phenolic Content (TPC), Flavonoid Content (TFC), and Saponins (TS)

The total phenol content was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteau method, according to Colonna et al. [13], with some modifications. The extracts were prepared using 0.1000 g of dry, raw material and 10 mL of 80% methanol. In a test tube, 0.6 mL of extract, 3 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, and 2.0 mL of Na2CO3 7.5% were added. After the mixture was vortexed, it was allowed to react for 60 min in the dark. Finally, the absorbance at 765 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer (UV-2600, SHIMADZU, Tokyo, Japan) using distilled water as a blank. The content of total phenols was expressed as equivalent mg of gallic acid per g of the dry sample.
Total flavonoid content was estimated by the AlCl3 colorimetric method [47]. Briefly, 20 mg/mL of the extract was prepared using 60% ethanol. The extract of 2 mL was used with 0.4 mL of a 10% (p/v) aluminum trichloride (AlCl3) solution and 0.4 mL of 5% sodium nitrate (NaNO2). Subsequently, the mixture was vortexed and incubated for 6 min. Then, 4 mL of NaOH (4%) was added to stop the reaction. Finally, the absorbance at 510 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer (UV-2600, SHIMADZU) using 60% ethanol as a blank. The total flavonoid content was expressed as equivalent mg of rutin per g of the dry sample.
Total saponins (TSs) were quantified by the colorimetric method according to Le et al. [17], with some modifications. The extracts were prepared using 0.1000 g of dried plant tissue and 7 mL of 70% (v/v) ethanol, and sonicated at 55 °C for 40 min. In a test tube, evaporate 0.2 mL of the extract in a water bath at a temperature of 70 °C and add 0.1 mL of 5% vanillin reagent and 0.4 mL of perchloric acid. The reaction was heated in a water bath at 60 °C for 15 min, and ethyl acetate (4 mL) was added for 10 min. Finally, the absorbance at 560 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer (UV-2600, SHIMADZU, Tokyo, Japan) using 70% ethanol as a blank. The total saponin content was expressed as equivalent mg of oleanolic acid per g of the dry sample.

3.3. Metabolite Composition Identification

The metabolite components were identified using the UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method, mainly based on Chen et al.’s study [79], with some modifications. A total of 100 mg of powder ground from each lyophilized leaf was weighed and extracted overnight at 4 °C with 0.6 mL of extracting solution. After centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min, the supernatant was aspirated. Samples were analyzed using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 (1.8 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) by a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, Shim-pack UFLC CBM30A system, SHIMADZU; MS, 4500 Q TRAP, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) to analyze 4 μL samples. The mobile-phase solvent A was ultrapure water (containing 0.04% acetic acid) and solvent B was acetonitrile (containing 0.04% acetic acid). The column temperature was 40 °C and a gradient procedure was used for sample measurements. The effluent was alternately connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP)-MS. The ESI source operating parameters were set as follows: electrospray ion source temperature, 550 °C; mass spectrometry voltage, 5500 V; curtain gas set to 30.0 psi; and collision-activated dissociation (CAD) high. Raw files generated from UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis were analyzed with Analyst 1.6.3 software. Q3 was used for metabolite quantification, while Q1, Q3, RT (retention time), DP (declustering potential), and CE (collision energy) were used for metabolite identification.

3.4. Antioxidant Activity Evaluation

The antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts was measured in vitro and included the following assays: DPPH radical scavenging activity, ABTS+ scavenging capacity, iron ion-reducing capacity, hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity, and anti-superoxide anion capacity. DPPH radical scavenging activity, ABTS+ scavenging capacity, and ferric ion-reduction capacity refer to Jia et al. [80] with slight modifications. Hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity and resistance to the superoxide anion radical (O2−) test were conducted with a hydroxyl free-radical assay kit and inhibition and production superoxide anion assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute).
DPPH radical scavenging activity: 2.7 mL of DPPH methanol solution (0.1 mmol/L) was added to the methanol extract (0.3 mL), as presented in Section 3.2.8, and the reaction was monitored at 517 nm until the absorbance was constant. Measurements were repeated three times for each sample. DPPH radical scavenging capacity was expressed as the equivalent amount of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) per gram of sample.
ABTS+ scavenging capacity combined 3.8 mL of ABTS+ working solution and extract (0.2 mL) and monitored the reaction at 734 nm. The ABTS+ radical scavenging capacity was expressed as the amount of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) equivalent per gram of sample.
Iron ion-reducing capacity: 1.8 mL of TPTZ working solution (100 mL of 0.3 mol/L acetate buffer; 10 mL of 10 mmol/L TPTZ solution and 10 mL of 20 mmol/L FeCl3 solution, a mixture of the three solutions) was added to 3.1 mL of ultrapure water and 0.1 mL of the extract to be tested, and the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 593 nm. All analyses were performed in triplicate. The millimolarity of FeSO4 was expressed as its reducing power.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

The values of all indexes determined in the experiment were recorded in triplicate and were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. SPSS Software (version 26.0) was used to apply these statistical tools.

4. Conclusions

The nutritional composition of Gonostegia hirta was evaluated and we concluded that it can be an important nutrient supplement, K, Ca, soluble sugars, organic acids, Asp, and omega-3 fatty acids. Moreover, the low content of potentially toxic and toxic metals (Pb, Cd, and Cr) indicated that the area from which the plant was removed was not contaminated. Additionally, Gonostegia hirta presented a high content of TP, TF, and TS, and contained a variety of health-promoting phytochemicals, such as rutin, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, vitamin C, vitamin E, etc, which proves that it can be an important source of natural antioxidants and has great potential to become a functional ingredient in the future. Furthermore, its methanol extract showed that it exhibited very good antioxidant abilities in DPPH, ABTS+, FRAP, hydroxyl radial scavenging capacity, and resistance to superoxide anion radical assays. In summary, a comprehensive analysis of Gonostegia hirta will help us to strengthen the protection and understanding of underexploited, edible, wild plants, and promote their growth, while simultaneously highlighting the interest in this edible, wild plant as a healthy dietary supplement.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12040875/s1, Table S1: Metabolite profiling analysis of Gonostegia hirta.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.Z.; Methodology, Z.H. and X.C.; Validation, Y.L.; Formal analysis, X.C.; Investigation, B.Z.; Resources, Z.H. and T.L.; Data curation, J.Y.; Writing—original draft, Y.L.; Writing—review & editing, B.Z. and J.Y.; Project administration, T.L.; Funding acquisition, J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Key R & D Program (grant number 2019C02014).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kew, R. State of the World’s Plants. Available online: https://stateoftheworldsplants.com/ (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  2. Mokria, M.; Gebretsadik, Y.; Birhane, E.; McMullin, S.; Ngethe, E.; Hadgu, K.; Hagazi, N.; Tewolde-Berhan, S. Nutritional and ecoclimatic importance of indigenous and naturalized wild edible plant species in Ethiopia. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2022, 4, 100084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hunter, D.; Borelli, T.; Beltrame, D.M.O.; Oliveira, C.N.S.; Coradin, L.; Wasike, V.; Wasilwa, L.; Mwai, J.; Manjella, A.; Samarasinghe, G.; et al. The potential of neglected and underutilized species for improving diets and nutrition. Planta 2019, 250, 709–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Minru, J.; Yi, Z. Dictionary of Chinese Ethnic Medicine; China Medical Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wong, J.; Matanjun, P.; Ooi, Y.; Chia, K. Characterization of phenolic compounds, carotenoids, vitamins and antioxidant activities of selected Malaysian wild edible plants. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 64, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ye, C.; Ge, N.; Zhu, Q.; Li, Q.; Song, J. Research on flavonoids extracted from Gonostegia hirta and their antioxidation performance. J. Chem. Eng. Chin. Univ. 2014, 28, 911–917. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hong, L.; Zhuo, J.; Lei, Q.; Zhou, J.; Ahmed, S.; Wang, C.; Long, Y.; Li, F.; Long, C. Ethnobotany of wild plants used for starting fermented beverages in Shui communities of southwest China. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2015, 11, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Aburto, N.; Hanson, S.; Gutierrez, H.; Hooper, L.; Elliott, P.; Cappuccio, F. Effect of increased potassium intake on cardiovascular risk factors and disease: Systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) 2013, 346, f1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Adams, J.; Sorenson, J.; Pollard, E.; Kirby, J.; Audhya, T. Evidence-based recommendations for an optimal prenatal supplement for women in the U.S., part two: Minerals. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gharibzahedi, S.; Jafari, S. The importance of minerals in human nutrition: Bioavailability, food fortification, processing effects and Nano encapsulation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 62, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Achi, N.; Onyeabo, C.; Ekeleme-Egedigwe, C.; Onyeanula, J. Phytochemical, proximate analysis, vitamin and mineral composition of aqueous extract of Ficus capensis leaves in South Eastern Nigeria. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 7, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
  12. Castro-Alba, V.; Lazarte, C.E.; Bergenståhl, B.; Granfeldt, Y. Phytate, iron, zinc, and calcium content of common Bolivian foods and their estimated mineral bioavailability. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2854–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Colonna, E.; Rouphael, Y.; Barbieri, G.; De Pascale, S. Nutritional quality of ten leafy vegetables harvested at two light intensities. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ammarellou, A.; Mozaffarian, V. The first report of iron-rich population of adapted medicinal spinach (Blitum virgatum L.) compared with cultivated spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Maret, W.; Sandstead, H. Zinc requirements and the risks and benefits of zinc supplementation. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2006, 20, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. He, Y.; Han, X.; Ge, J.; Wang, L. Multivariate statistical analysis of potentially toxic elements in soils under different land uses: Spatial relationship, ecological risk assessment, and source identification. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 44, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Le, L.; Gong, X.; An, Q.; Xiang, D.; Zou, L.; Peng, L.; Wu, X.; Tan, M.; Nie, Z.; Wu, Q.; et al. Quinoa sprouts as potential vegetable source: Nutrient composition and functional contents of different quinoa sprout varieties. Food Chem. 2021, 357, 129752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. DiNicolantonio, J.; O’Keefe, J.; Wilson, W. Sugar addiction: Is it real? A narrative review. Br. J. Sport. Med. 2018, 52, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdalla, M.; Li, F.; Wenzel-Storjohann, A.; Sulieman, S.; Tasdemir, D.; Mühling, K. Comparative metabolite profile, biological activity and overall quality of three lettuce (Lactuca sativa L., Asteraceae) cultivars in response to sulfur nutrition. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, X.; Yuan, F.; Fu, X.; Zhu, D. Profiling and relationship of water-soluble sugar and protein compositions in soybean seeds. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iyda, J.; Fernandes, Â.; Ferreira, F.; Alves, M.; Pires, T.; Barros, L.; Amaral, J.; Ferreira, I. Chemical composition and bioactive properties of the wild edible plant Raphanus raphanistrum L. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhu, H.; Zhu, J.; Wang, L.; Li, Z. Development of a SPME-GC-MS method for the determination of volatile compounds in Shanxi aged vinegar and its analytical characterization by aroma wheel. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jia, Y.; Burbidge, C.; Sweetman, C.; Schutz, E.; Soole, K.; Jenkins, C.; Hancock, R.; Bruning, J.; Ford, C. An aldo-keto reductase with 2-keto-l-gulonate reductase activity functions in l-tartaric acid biosynthesis from vitamin C in Vitis vinifera. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 15932–15946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ding, Y.; Ye, Q.; Liu, M.; Shi, Z.; Liang, Y. Reductive release of Fe mineral-associated organic matter accelerated by oxalic acid. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 763, 142937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nguyễn, H.V.H.; Savage, G.P. Oxalate content of New Zealand grown and imported fruits. J. Food Compos. Analysis. 2013, 31, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koh, E.; Charoenprasert, S.; Mitchell, A.E. Effect of organic and conventional cropping systems on ascorbic acid, vitamin c, flavonoids, nitrate, and oxalate in 27 varieties of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3144–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gülçin, İ. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: An overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 345–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, K.; Lin, L.; Li, Q.; Xue, Y.; Zheng, F.; Wang, G.; Zheng, C.; Du, L.; Hu, M.; Huang, Y.; et al. Scd1 controls de novo beige fat biogenesis through succinate-dependent regulation of mitochondrial complex II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 2462–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kwon, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, A.; Kim, B.; Park, W.; Hur, J.; Jang, H.; Yang, H.; Cho, H.; Kim, H. Plant callus-derived shikimic acid regenerates human skin through converting human dermal fibroblasts into multipotent skin-derived precursor cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zgrajka, W.; Turska, M.; Rajtar, G.; Majdan, M.; Parada-Turska, J. Kynurenic acid content in anti-rheumatic herbs. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2013, 20, 800–802. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Tian, H.; Zhang, H.; Xiong, J.; Lu, J.; Liu, Y. Evaluation of amino acid composition and nutritional value of Lespedeza formosain different phenological periods. J. Chin. J. Grassl. 2022, 44, 98–105. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hase, A.; Jung, S.E.; aan het Rot, M. Behavioral and cognitive effects of tyrosine intake in healthy human adults. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2015, 133, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McNeal, C.; Meininger, C.J.; Reddy, D.; Wilborn, C.; Wu, G. Safety and effectiveness of arginine in adults. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 2587S–2593S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Chen, X.; Yi, J.; Liu, J.; Luo, Q.; Liu, L. Enzymatic production of trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline by proline 4-hydroxylase. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Iijima, R.; Takahashi, H.; Namme, R.; Ikegami, S.; Yamazaki, M. Novel biological function of sialic acid (N-acetylneuraminic acid) as a hydrogen peroxide scavenger. FEBS Lett. 2004, 561, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Türközü, D.; Şanlier, N. L-theanine, unique amino acid of tea, and its metabolism, health effects, and safety. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1681–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Feng, S.; Xu, X.; Tao, S.; Chen, T.; Zhou, L.; Huang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yuan, M.; Ding, C. Comprehensive evaluation of chemical composition and health-promoting effects with chemometrics analysis of plant derived edible oils. Food Chem. X 2022, 14, 100341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Djuricic, I.; Calder, P.C. Beneficial outcomes of omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on human health: An update for 2021. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Simopoulos, A. An Increase in the Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity. Nutrients 2016, 8, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ohmori, H.; Fujii, K.; Kadochi, Y.; Mori, S.; Nishiguchi, Y.; Fujiwara, R.; Kishi, S.; Sasaki, T.; Kuniyasu, H. Elaidic acid, a trans-fatty acid, enhances the metastasis of colorectal cancer cells. Pathobiology 2017, 84, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shabbir, M.; Khan, M.; Saeed, M.; Pasha, I.; Khalil, A.; Siraj, N. Punicic acid: A striking health substance to combat metabolic syndromes in humans. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lee, S.; Choi, B.Y.; Kim, J.; Kho, A.R.; Sohn, M.; Song, H.; Choi, H.; Suh, S. Late treatment with choline alfoscerate (L-alpha glycerylphosphorylcholine, α-GPC) increases hippocampal neurogenesis and provides protection against seizure-induced neuronal death and cognitive impairment. Brain Res. 2016, 1654, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Floris, B.; Galloni, P.; Conte, V.; Sabuzi, F. Tailored functionalization of natural phenols to improve biological activity. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hazafa, A.; Iqbal, M.O.; Javaid, U.; Tareen, M.B.K.; Amna, D.; Ramzan, A.; Piracha, S.; Naeem, M. Inhibitory effect of polyphenols (phenolic acids, lignans, and stilbenes) on cancer by regulating signal transduction pathways: A review. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2022, 24, 432–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pei, K.; Ou, J.; Huang, J.; Ou, S. p-Coumaric acid and its conjugates: Dietary sources, pharmacokinetic properties and biological activities. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 2952–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ge, X.; Jing, L.; Zhao, K.; Su, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Han, L.; Yu, X.; Li, W. The phenolic compounds profile, quantitative analysis and antioxidant activity of four naked barley grains with different color. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Lin, Y.; Qiu, X.; Zhuang, Y. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted total flavonoid extraction from Brassica juncea and lipid antioxidant activity of the extract. J. Food Res. Dev. 2021, 42, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lehane, A.; Saliba, K. Common dietary flavonoids inhibit the growth of the intraerythrocytic malaria parasite. BMC Res. Notes 2008, 18, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tang, D.; Chen, K.; Huang, L.; Li, J. Pharmacokinetic properties and drug interactions of apigenin, a natural flavone. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2017, 13, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, M.; Firrman, J.; Liu, L.; Yam, K. A review on flavonoid apigenin: Dietary intake, adme, antimicrobial effects, and interactions with human gut microbiota. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 7010467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Imran, M.; Rauf, A.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Nadeem, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Khan, I.A.; Imran, A.; Orhan, I.E.; Rizwan, M.; Atif, M.; et al. Luteolin, a flavonoid, as an anticancer agent: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 112, 108612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Felice, M.R.; Maugeri, A.; De Sarro, G.; Navarra, M.; Barreca, D. Molecular pathways involved in the anti-cancer activity of flavonols: A focus on myricetin and kaempferol. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lei, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, W.; Xi, Z.; Liu, M.; Ran, J.; Huang, J. Study on flavonoid chemical constituents contained in Memorialis hirta. J. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2012, 37, 478–482. [Google Scholar]
  54. Juang, Y.; Liang, P. Biological and pharmacological effects of synthetic saponins. Molecules 2020, 25, 4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Tang, X.; Liang, Q.; Tan, H.; Xiao, C.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, Y. Preliminary study on hepatotoxicity induced by dioscin and its possible mechanism. J. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2015, 40, 2748–2752. [Google Scholar]
  56. Xu, S.; Qi, F.; Xi, L.; Sun, W.; Wu, L.; Chu, D. Optimization of the extraction process of congmungu total saponin and its antioxidant effects by response surface method. J. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2020, 48, 204–209. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, M.; Zhao, M.; Wei, P.; Zhang, C.; Lu, W. Biosynthesis of soyasapogenol b by engineered saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 3202–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Adamski, Z.; Blythe, L.; Milella, L.; Bufo, S.A. Biological activities of alkaloids: From toxicology to pharmacology. Toxins 2020, 12, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Özçelik, B.; Kartal, M.; Orhan, I. Cytotoxicity, antiviral and antimicrobial activities of alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenolic acids. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhou, J.; Chan, L.; Zhou, S. Trigonelline: A plant alkaloid with therapeutic potential for diabetes and central nervous system disease. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 3523–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mishkinsky, J.S.; Goldschmied, A.; Joseph, B.; Ahronson, Z.; Sulman, F.G. Hypoglycaemic effect of Trigonella foenum graecum and Lupinus termis (leguminosae) seeds and their major alkaloids in alloxan-diabetic and normal rats. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Et De Thérapie 1974, 210, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  62. Szkudelska, K.; Szkudelski, T. The anti-diabetic potential of betaine. Mechanisms of action in rodent models of type 2 diabetes. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 150, 112946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Herman, A.; Herman, A. Caffeine’s mechanisms of action and its cosmetic use. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2013, 26, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jee, H.; Lee, S.; Bormate, K.; Jung, Y. Effect of caffeine consumption on the risk for neurological and psychiatric disorders: Sex differences in human. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fowler, J.; Zug, K.; Taylor, J.; Storrs, F.; Sherertz, E.; Sasseville, D.; Rietschel, R.; Pratt, M.; Mathias, C.; Marks, J.; et al. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine in North America. Derm 2004, 15, 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, L. A study of the sensitization rate to cocamidopropyl betaine in patients patch tested in a university hospital of Beijing. Contact Dermat. 2008, 58, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tse, R.; Wong, C.; Chiu, P.; Ng, C. The Potential role of spermine and its acetylated derivative in human malignancies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thilavech, T.; Marnpae, M.; Mäkynen, K.; Adisakwattana, S. Phytochemical composition, antiglycation, antioxidant activity and methylglyoxal-trapping action of brassica vegetables. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2021, 76, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mi, S.; Ruan, Z.; Weng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liu, W.; Yin, Y.; Jiang, B. Sutdy on the antioxidant activity of several common vegetables and fruits and the correlation between the content of pdyphenols and VC and the antioxidant activity. J. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2013, 34, 133–136. [Google Scholar]
  70. Munteanu, I.; Apetrei, C. Analytical methods used in determining antioxidant activity: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Piazzon, A.; Vrhovsek, U.; Masuero, D.; Mattivi, F.; Mandoj, F.; Nardini, M. Antioxidant activity of phenolic acids and their metabolites: Synthesis and antioxidant properties of the sulfate derivatives of ferulic and caffeic acids and of the acyl glucuronide of ferulic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 12312–12323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ferreira, P.S.; Victorelli, F.D.; Fonseca-Santos, B.; Chorilli, M. A review of analytical methods for p-coumaric acid in plant-based products, beverages, and biological matrices. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019, 49, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wang, Y.; Xie, M.; Ma, G.; Fang, Y.; Yang, W.; Ma, N.; Fang, D.; Hu, Q.; Pei, F. The antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of different phenolic acids grafted onto chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 225, 115238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Abdel-Razzak, S.; Ismail, E.; Fekry, S.; Hassan, D. Plant growth, yield and bioactive compounds of two culinary herbs as affected by substrate type. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 243, 464–471. [Google Scholar]
  75. Xu, G. Studies on the effect of lipid on rice quality and lipid metabolism in response to high temperature and weak light stresses. Sichuan Agric. Univ. 2017, 12, 145. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Gerendás, J. Interactive effects of phosphorus supply and light intensity on glucosinolates in pakchoi (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis var. communis). Plant Soil. 2009, 323, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yao, G. Conformation and Characteristics of Sugar and Acid in Pear Fruits of Cultivated Species. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  78. Song, Y.; Fang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, J. Changes in organic acids and anthocyanins contents during shelf storage of fresh—Cut Purple Caitai (Brassica campestris L. ssp. Chinensis L. var. purpurea Bailey). J. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2016, 37, 300–305. [Google Scholar]
  79. Chen, K.; Sun, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Chen, L.; Li, W.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, K. Postharvest dehydration temperature modulates the transcriptomic programme and flavonoid profile of grape berries. Foods. 2021, 10, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jia, G.; Wu, L.; Yang, C.; Liu, H. Polyphenol contents of peel and flesh extracts from mango and guava and the comparative analysis of their antioxidant properties. J. Hainan Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2018, 31, 38–43. [Google Scholar]
Plants 12 00875 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage of metabolite substance types of Gonostegia hirta by UPLC-MS/MS. The inner circle shows the 11 major groups into which the 418 metabolites are divided, namely, flavonoids, lipids, phenolic acids, amino acids and derivatives, organic acids, alkaloids, nucleotides and derivatives (N and D), lignans and coumarins (L and C), terpenoids, tannins, and others. The outer circle is a subdivision of the 11 major groups, namely, alkaloids, phenolamine, and plumerane of alkaloids; anthocyanins, chalcones, dihydroflavone, dihydroflavonol, flavanols, flavonoid, flavonoid carbonoside, flavonols, and isoflavones of flavonoids; sinensetin, coumarins, and lignans of L and C; free fatty acids, glycerol ester (GE), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), and sphingolipids of lipids; N and D and organic acids; saccharides and alcohols (S and A) and vitamin of others; phenolic acids and proanthocyanidins of tannins; triterpene and triterpene saponin (TS) of terpenoids.
Figure 1. Percentage of metabolite substance types of Gonostegia hirta by UPLC-MS/MS. The inner circle shows the 11 major groups into which the 418 metabolites are divided, namely, flavonoids, lipids, phenolic acids, amino acids and derivatives, organic acids, alkaloids, nucleotides and derivatives (N and D), lignans and coumarins (L and C), terpenoids, tannins, and others. The outer circle is a subdivision of the 11 major groups, namely, alkaloids, phenolamine, and plumerane of alkaloids; anthocyanins, chalcones, dihydroflavone, dihydroflavonol, flavanols, flavonoid, flavonoid carbonoside, flavonols, and isoflavones of flavonoids; sinensetin, coumarins, and lignans of L and C; free fatty acids, glycerol ester (GE), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), and sphingolipids of lipids; N and D and organic acids; saccharides and alcohols (S and A) and vitamin of others; phenolic acids and proanthocyanidins of tannins; triterpene and triterpene saponin (TS) of terpenoids.
Plants 12 00875 g001
Plants 12 00875 g002 550
Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of amino acids in Gonostegia hirta: 1. Asp; 2. Ser; 3. Glu; 4. Gly; 5. His; 6. Arg; 7. Thr; 8. Ala; 9. Pro; 10. Cys; 11. Tyr; 12. Val; 13. Met; 14. Lys; 15. Ile; 16. Leu; and 17. Phe.
Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of amino acids in Gonostegia hirta: 1. Asp; 2. Ser; 3. Glu; 4. Gly; 5. His; 6. Arg; 7. Thr; 8. Ala; 9. Pro; 10. Cys; 11. Tyr; 12. Val; 13. Met; 14. Lys; 15. Ile; 16. Leu; and 17. Phe.
Plants 12 00875 g002
Plants 12 00875 g003 550
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatogram of fatty acids in Gonostegia hirta: 1. Octanoic acid; 2. Decanoic acid; 3. Lauric acid; 4. Myristic acid; 5. Pentadecanoic acid; 6. Palmitoleic acid; 7. Palmitic acid; 8. Heptadecanoic acid; 9. Linoleic acid; 10. Inolenic acid; 11. Stearic acid; 12. Stearolic acid; 13. Nonadecanoic acid; 14. Arachidonic acid; 15. Eicosanoic acid; and 16. behenic acid.
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatogram of fatty acids in Gonostegia hirta: 1. Octanoic acid; 2. Decanoic acid; 3. Lauric acid; 4. Myristic acid; 5. Pentadecanoic acid; 6. Palmitoleic acid; 7. Palmitic acid; 8. Heptadecanoic acid; 9. Linoleic acid; 10. Inolenic acid; 11. Stearic acid; 12. Stearolic acid; 13. Nonadecanoic acid; 14. Arachidonic acid; 15. Eicosanoic acid; and 16. behenic acid.
Plants 12 00875 g003
Table
Table 1. The contents of moisture, crude fat, mineral elements, soluble sugars, and organic acids in Gonostegia hirta.
Table 1. The contents of moisture, crude fat, mineral elements, soluble sugars, and organic acids in Gonostegia hirta.
CompoundsContent
Moisture (%)-50.84 ± 0.01
Crude fat (%)-2.57 ± 0.03
Minerals (mg/100 g DW)Calcium1352.49 ± 52.19
Potassium3855.22 ± 88.35
Magnesium284.35 ± 11.51
Phosphorus569.51 ± 15.84
Aluminium10.37 ± 0.41
Cuprum0.75 ± 0.01
Ferrum9.96 ± 0.28
Zinc10.47 ± 0.37
Potentially toxic elements
(mg/100 g DW)		Cadmium0.02 ± 0.00
Lead0.06 ± 0.01
Chromium0.09 ± 0.03
Soluble sugars (mg/g DW)Sucrose26.89 ± 0.87
Glucose19.49 ± 1.34
Fructose40.65 ± 1.64
Organic acids (mg/g DW)Oxalic acid3.4 ± 0.78
Tartaric acid10.68 ± 1.72
Ascorbic acid1.30 ± 0.14
Citric acid22.50 ± 3.82
Note: “-”: does not have other compounds; “DW”: dry weight.
Table
Table 2. Amino acid composition and content of Gonostegia hirta (mg/g DW).
Table 2. Amino acid composition and content of Gonostegia hirta (mg/g DW).
CompoundsContent
Aspartic acid (Asp)0.288 ± 0.029
Serine (Ser)0.062 ± 0.007
Glutamic acid (Glu)0.043 ± 0.016
Glycine (Gly)0.007 ± 0.002
Histidine (His)0.091 ± 0.012
Arginine (Arg)0.057 ± 0.023
Threonine (Thr)0.033 ± 0.005
Alanine (Ala)0.077 ± 0.023
Proline (Pro)0.085 ± 0.006
Cysteine (Cys)0.014 ± 0.009
Tyrosine (Tyr)0.197 ± 0.013
Valine (Val)0.020 ± 0.001
Methionine (Met)0.015 ± 0.004
Lysine (Lys)0.014 ± 0.001
Isoleucine (Ile)0.009 ± 0.001
Leucine (Leu)0.011 ± 0.002
Phenylalanine (Phe)0.011 ± 0.000
Total1.034
Note: “DW”: dry weight.
Table
Table 3. Fatty acid composition and content analysis of Gonostegia hirta (μg/g DW).
Table 3. Fatty acid composition and content analysis of Gonostegia hirta (μg/g DW).
CompoundsContent
Octanoic acid C8:00.7 ± 0.1
Decanoic acid C10:00.8 ± 0.1
Lauric acid C12:06.9 ± 0.7
Myristic acid C14:059.0 ± 2.0
Pentadecanoic acid C15:05.0 ± 0.2
Palmitoleic acidC16:14.7 ± 0.6
Palmitic acidC16:0849.0 ± 30.0
Heptadecanoic acidC17:09.7 ± 0.8
Linoleic acidC18:2n6c1898.0 ± 30.0
Linolenic acid C18:3n61434.0 ± 36.0
Stearic acidC18:0215.0 ± 12.0
Stearolic acid-4.0 ± 0.9
Nonadecanoic acidC19:022.0 ± 6.0
Arachidonic acid C20:048.0 ± 6.0
Eicosanoic acid C21:010.0 ± 2.0
Behenic acid C22:065.0 ± 7.0
SFA a (%) 27.4
PUFA b (%) 72.6
Total fatty acids 4629.0
Note: a SFAs: saturated fatty acids; b PUFAs: polyunsaturated fatty acids; “DW”: dry weight.
Table
Table 4. The contents of TP, TF, and TS in Gonostegia hirta (mg/g DW).
Table 4. The contents of TP, TF, and TS in Gonostegia hirta (mg/g DW).
Bioactive CompoundsContent
Total phenols1.20 ± 0.1
Total flavonoids76.49 ± 5.58
Total saponins 60.30 ± 0.66
Note: “DW”: dry weight.
Table
Table 5. The antioxidant activities of Gonostegia hirta extract.
Table 5. The antioxidant activities of Gonostegia hirta extract.
Antioxidant ActivityValue
DPPH scavenging activity(mg/g)5.92 ± 0.00
ABTS+ scavenging activity(mg/g)68.82 ± 0.37
Ferric reducing power (μmol/L)62.23 ± 0.80
Anti-superoxide anion viability (U/g)11.82 ± 0.18
Inhibition of hydroxyl radicals (U/g)90.90 ± 0.89
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Hu, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhu, B.; Liu, T.; Yang, J. Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Gonostegia hirta: An Underexploited, Potentially Edible, Wild Plant. Plants 2023, 12, 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040875

AMA Style

Li Y, Hu Z, Chen X, Zhu B, Liu T, Yang J. Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Gonostegia hirta: An Underexploited, Potentially Edible, Wild Plant. Plants. 2023; 12(4):875. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040875

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yaochen, Zheng Hu, Xiaoqi Chen, Biao Zhu, Tingfu Liu, and Jing Yang. 2023. "Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Gonostegia hirta: An Underexploited, Potentially Edible, Wild Plant" Plants 12, no. 4: 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040875

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop