Next Article in Journal
A Review of Pistacia lentiscus Polyphenols: Chemical Diversity and Pharmacological Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
NMR-Based Metabolomics for Geographical Discrimination of Adhatoda vasica Leaves
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Interaction of Sugar and Hormone Metabolism Involved in the Root Hair Morphogenesis of the Endangered Fir Abies beshanzuensis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Triterpene Derivatives from Garcinia oligantha and Their Anti-Cancer Activity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of Solid-Phase Fermentation on Flavonoids, Phenolic Acids, Tannins and Antioxidant Activity in Chamerion angustifolium (L.) Holub (Fireweed) Leaves

by Marius Lasinskas 1,*, Elvyra Jariene 1, Nijole Vaitkeviciene 1, Jurgita Kulaitiene 1, Aida Adamaviciene 2 and Ewelina Hallmann 3,4
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 30 December 2022 / Accepted: 31 December 2022 / Published: 6 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Identification and Analysis of Bioactive Components from Plants)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Attach fie

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In introduction, each paragraph starts with fireweeds. Additionally, sentence after sentence starts with fireweeds. There are information’s that are not important.

Meaningful discussion is needed; why there is lower amount of polyphenols after 48 h fermentation and 72 while in anaerobic condition there is different trend. This is for total amount as well as for some individual compound. Fluctuation of results is quite questionable. Why gallic acid is in such a high amount after 24 h fermentation; all other samples have significantly lower amount of this acid – this should be check with additional studies if it is correct. Discussion have to be improved; comparison with other studies which used solid phase fermentation if they obtained such fluctuation of results, since it might be a problem with starting sample.

Only one assay was used for evaluation of AA; other methods have to be applied in order to obtain better picture of AA of samples.

r = 0.7643 is not strong correlation

Organization of material and methods section have to be improved.

English has to be checked and improved. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Author, I reviewed the manuscript (plants-2079569) entitled The Impact of Solid-phase Fermentation on Flavonoids, Phenolic acids, Tannins and Antioxidant Activity in Chamerion angustifolium (L.) Holub (fireweed) Leaves. This manuscript presents relevant information about solid-phase fermentation's impact on antioxidant potential of Chamerioun angustifolium. However, some sections of the presented data can be improved. For this reason, I consider that this manuscript needs minor changes to be considered for publication in this journal. 

 

Additional comments.

Highlight the advantages of using Chamerion angustifolium as antioxidant source.

Check the paragraph extension in this manuscript.

Include an experimental design containing statistical factors and response variables in the statistical analyses applied to the findings of this research.

Try to discuss the obtained findings with similar works where similar plants were processed under solid-phase fermentation and antioxidant properties were evaluated. 

Include future trends to keep working with the obtained data. 

Try to conclude with a general statement of the most relevant part of this study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

It is not possible to understend figure 2.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop