Next Article in Journal
OsWRKY97, an Abiotic Stress-Induced Gene of Rice, Plays a Key Role in Drought Tolerance
Next Article in Special Issue
Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of the 175 Soybean Breeding Lines and Varieties Cultivated in West Siberia and Other Regions of Russia
Previous Article in Journal
Lead Toxicity-Mediated Growth and Metabolic Alterations at Early Seedling Stages of Maize (Zea mays L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenotypic Variation Analysis and Excellent Clone Selection of Alnus cremastogyne from Different Provenances
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 18
10.3390/plants12183336
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Structure Variation in qPH8.2 Detrimentally Affects Plant Architecture and Yield in Rice

by
Wenqiang Sun
1,2,
Qiang Sun
3,
Li Tian
3,
Yongjian Sun
1,3 and
Sibin Yu
1,3,*
1
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(18), 3336; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183336
Submission received: 4 September 2023 / Revised: 14 September 2023 / Accepted: 15 September 2023 / Published: 21 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Plant Species)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant height is an important agronomic trait associated with plant architecture and grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In this study, we report the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for plant height using a chromosomal segment substitution line (CSSL) population with substituted segments from japonica variety Nipponbare (NIP) in the background of the indica variety 9311. Eight stable QTLs for plant height were identified in three environments. Among them, six loci were co-localized with known genes such as semidwarf-1 (sd1) and Grain Number per Panicle1 (GNP1) involved in gibberellin biosynthesis. A minor QTL qPH8.2 on chromosome 8 was verified and fine-mapped to a 74 kb region. Sequence comparison of the genomic region revealed the presence/absence of a 42 kb insertion between NIP and 9311. This insertion occurred predominantly in temperate japonica rice. Comparisons on the near-isogenic lines showed that the qPH8.2 allele from NIP exhibits pleiotropic effects on plant growth, including reduced plant height, leaf length, photosynthetic capacity, delayed heading date, decreased yield, and increased tiller angle. These results indicate that qPH8.2 from temperate japonica triggers adverse effects on plant growth and yield when introduced into the indica rice, highlighting the importance of the inter-subspecies crossing breeding programs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important crops, providing a staple food for half of the world’s population [1]. Plant height, controlled by the number of elongated internodes and the length of internodes, is a determinant trait owing to its essential roles in plant architecture and grain yield. Proper plant height improves lodging resistance, fertilizer absorption efficiency, and grain yield in crops [2]. Thus, understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying plant height is crucial for crop improvement.
Quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies have confirmed that plant height is a complex trait controlled by several major and minor loci and affected by kinds of plant hormones and external environmental factors [3]. More than one hundred genes related to plant height have been identified and distributed on the 12 chromosomes in rice (http://archive.gramene.org/qtl/, accessed on 1 September 2023). Many plant height genes are related to the biosynthesis and regulation of phytohormones, such as gibberellin acid (GA) and auxin [2,4]. The semidwarf-1 (sd1) gene is the ‘green revolution gene’ that significantly boosts crop yield by increasing the harvest index and reducing the probability of rice lodging before harvest [5]. SD1 encodes GA20 oxidase-2 (GA20ox-2) to catalyze late steps of the active GA biosynthesis [6]. The loss-of-function mutation of GA20ox-2 results in dwarf or semi-dwarf plants. Several mutated alleles of SD1 have been discovered in germplasm and are being widely used in rice breeding [7]. Grain Number per Panicle1 (GNP1) encodes GA20ox-1 participating in the GA biosynthesis and was proven to affect rice plant height and grain number [8,9]. It is worth noting that most of the plant height genes play a pleiotropic effect on plant architecture and yield-related traits. For example, NARROW LEAF1 (NAL1) encoding a serine protease controls flag leaf width, panicle size, and panicle number and influences plant height by affecting polar auxin transport [10,11,12,13]. The transcription factors Ghd7 and Ghd8 regulate plant height, heading date, and grain number by promoting cell division [14,15]. These findings reveal complex and diverse genetic mechanisms in regulating plant height in rice.
The chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL) is a powerful tool for QTL identification for complex traits in plants. Remarkably, the CSSL shows a great advantage in identifying minor-effect QTLs as it contains only one or a few introduced segments in the same background, which can eliminate background interference. In addition, the CSSL provides a good foundation for the quick development of near-isogenic lines (NIL) and secondary segregating populations for genetic validation and fine-mapping of the interested QTLs [16,17]. Indica and japonica rice are the two major subspecies of cultivated rice. Extensive genetic variations, including single nucleotide polymorphisms and structure variations (SV) between these subspecies, are associated with phenotypic variations in plant growth and development and environmental adaptability [18,19,20,21]. Previously, a set of CSSLs composed of 122 lines, each carrying a particular introduced segment from the japonica variety Nipponbare (NIP) in the background of indica variety 9311, was developed. We identified many QTLs related to seed dormancy and hybrid vigor using this CSSL population [22,23].
In this study, using the NIP/9311 CSSL population, we identified eight stable QTLs for plant height in three environments. Six loci were co-localized with some reported genes (SD1, GNP1, and NAL1). A novel minor QTL (qPH8.2) was identified and delimited to a 74 kb region carrying several candidate genes for plant architecture. Analysis of the NILs containing the presence and absence of this region revealed that the qPH8.2 alleles from NIP have pleiotropic effects on plant growth with reduced plant height, leaf length, photosynthetic capacity, and grain yield, delayed heading date, and increased tiller angle in the indica background.

2. Results

2.1. QTLs Detected for Plant Height in the CSSL Population

We used a set of CSSLs with introduced chromosome segments from NIP in the 9311 background to survey plant height variation under three environments. NIP is a semi-dwarf variety with a plant height of 73 cm, while 9311 is a moderately taller variety with a plant height of 118 cm (Figure 1a). CSSLs showed a considerable variation in plant height, ranging from 81 to 175 cm, with a mean of 117 cm, and exhibited a quantitative trait inheritance pattern. Most of these lines displayed plant height similar to 9311, but several lines had significantly higher or lower values than 9311 (Figure 1b,c). The lines with extreme higher or lower values may contain genes associated with plant height in the introduced NIP segments. A ridge regression analysis of the CSSL population with 387 bin markers identified twelve QTLs for plant height at Hainan in 2016 (E1), nine at Wuhan in 2016 (E2), and eight at Wuhan in 2017 (E3), respectively. Among these QTLs, seven QTLs on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, and 8 were detected repeatedly in three environments, and one QTL (qPH8.1) revealed a significant effect (p < 0.01) at E2 and E3, but marginal significance (p = 0.051) at E3 (Table 1). These eight stable QTLs explained approximately 80% of phenotypic variance in the population, and half of them with NIP alleles had a negative effect on plant height. Of them, qPH1.2 and qPH1.3, explaining more than 10% of the phenotypic variances, were two major QTLs. qPH1.3, located at the semidwarf-1 gene sd1, had the largest additive effect, with the NIP allele increasing height and explaining approximately 37.7% of the phenotypic variance. The other five of the eight loci were co-localized with several corresponding genes associated with plant height, i.e., OsGA2ox3, GNP1, SSD1, NAL1, and Ghd8 (Figure 1d; Table 1). Notably, qPH8.2, a minor QTL on chromosome 8 that negatively affects plant height, was not reported before.

2.2. Genetic Validation of qPH8.2

To evaluate the genetic effect of qPH8.2, the line (CSSL32) that contains an introduced NIP segment covering qPH8.2 was selected for genetic validation (Figure 2a,b). The plant height of CSSL32 was 26.1 cm lower than that of 9311. On the other side, CSSL32 showed an increase in heading date by 5.2 days and tiller angle by 15.5° compared to 9311 (Figure 2c–e).
The graphic genotype of CSSL32 showed three other introduced NIP segments on chromosomes 1, 3, and 10 (Figure 2b). To verify the genetic effect of qPH8.2, CSSL32 was crossed with 9311 to generate a CSSL-derived F2 population. Then, a small F2 population composed of 288 individuals was genotyped by using six polymorphic markers (01C131, 03C041, RM5556, M9060, M1508, and 10C051) to target the four introduced segments (Figure 2b). ANOVA of three genotypes at each marker revealed that only the two markers, M9060 and M1508, located in the qPH8.2 region on chromosome 8, were significantly associated with plant height (Table S1). A segregation ratio of approximately 1:2:1 for plant height phenotype suggested that the short phenotype was caused by a recessive gene at a single locus. The individuals with homozygous NIP genotype at M9060 showed shorter plant height, later heading date, and larger tiller angle than those with homozygous 9311 genotype or heterozygous genotype in this F2 population (Figure 2f–h). These results validated the effect of qPH8.2 in regulating plant height and revealed that the NIP allele is recessive to the 9311 allele at qPH8.2. Together with seven additional polymorphic markers across qPH8.2, a linkage map is constructed (Table S2). Further, QTL analysis of mapped qPH8.2 to the interval between the markers M8061 and M1077 was conducted. qPH8.2 explained 60.3% of the phenotypic variance of plant height, 50.8% of the phenotypic variance of heading date, and 19.2% of the tiller angle variance in the F2 population (Figure 3a). These results indicate that qPH8.2 is a pleiotropic QTL underlying plant height, heading date, and tiller angle.

2.3. Fine Mapping of qPH8.2

To perform fine mapping of qPH8.2, a large CSSL-derived segregating population comprising 4200 individuals was used to select the recombinants between the markers M8061 and M1077. Eight informative recombinants were obtained using eight additional markers (Table S2, Figure S1). A progeny test of plant height, heading date, and tiller angle for the informative recombinants delimited qPH8.2 into a 74 kb region flanked by markers M9211 and M9285 (Figure 3b).
Sequence comparison of NIP and 9311 in this 74 kb region revealed the presence of a 42 kb insertion in NIP but an absence of the insertion in 9311 (Figure 3c). Two predicted genes (Loc_Os08g15220 and Loc_Os08g15230) are outside the 42 kb region. Loc_Os08g15220 encodes a retrotransposon. Loc_Os08g15230 encodes a heat shock protein. However, the sequence comparison of Loc_Os08g15230 showed no nucleotide variation between NIP and 9311. The 42 kb insertion may be the putative region harboring the causal gene for plant height. In this 42 kb insertion region, there are 20 predicted genes based on the reference NIP genome. According to the expression profile database (http://rice.uga.edu/, accessed on 5 April 2023), 10 of 20 genes were expressed—in at least one tissue, such as shoot, leaf, or inflorescence (Figure 3d). Examining the expression of these genes, we found that only Loc_Os08g15296 was expressed in the shoot, leaf, and inflorescence, whereas the other genes, except for Loc_Os08g15312, were hardly detectable in the shoot. Therefore, Loc_Os08g15296 encoding a photosystem II reaction center protein H may be the promising gene for qPH8.2.

2.4. Frequency of the 42 kb Insertion in Rice Germplasm

To analyze the presence or absence of the 42 kb insertion in rice accessions, we downloaded the sequences of the 74 kb region in 86 rice accessions, which include ten temperate japonica rice, fifteen tropic japonica rice, thirty-nine indica rice, eight aus rice, seven basmati rice, and seven wild relatives (http://ricerc.sicau.edu.cn/, accessed on 6 July 2023). In the japonica subgroup, sequence alignment analyses found that the 42 kb insertion occurred in all 10 surveyed temperate japonica accessions, but the absence of the insertion was observed in the 15 tropic japonica accessions, as well as in the 39 indica rice and other remaining accessions (Table S3). These results indicate that the 42 kb insertion is predominantly present in temperate japonica rice.

2.5. Pleiotropic Effects of qPH8.2 on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Plant Yield

To evaluate the genetic effect of qPH8.2 precisely, a pair of near-isogenic lines (NILs), NIL-NIP and NIL-9311, were developed, which carry only a 1.3-Mb segment covering the contrasting NIP and 9311 alleles at qPH8.2 within the 9311 background. Compared to NIL-9311, NIL-NIP showed a decrease in plant height by 20.1 cm, a delay in heading date by 4.5 days, and an increase in tiller angle by 16° at the heading stage, which was consistent with the effect of qPH8.2 in CSSL32. In addition, NIL-NIP also decreased plant height by 29.4% and 34.7% at the seedling and tillering stages, respectively (Figure 4a–n). Following the decrease in plant height, NIL-NIP significantly reduced the internode length and the panicle length (Figure 4d,e,j,k). In addition, NIL-NIP shortened the flag leaf length by 26% (Figure 4f). Notably, except for reducing plant height, qPH8.2 from NIP also adversely affected panicle number, grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight, and grain yield per plant (Figure 4o–r). These results indicate that qPH8.2 inhibits plant growth and grain yield of rice.
As two candidate genes were involved in photosynthesis, the photosynthetic parameters of the flag leaves at the heading stage were measured on the two NILs to confirm whether qPH8.2 affects photosynthetic capacity. As shown in Figure 4, compared to NIL-9311, the photosynthetic rate was 12.2% lower in NIL-NIP, and NIL-NIP also reduced the stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and intercellular CO2 concentration (Figure 4s–v). These results suggest that qPH8.2 may inhibit plant growth by repressing photosynthetic capacity.

3. Discussion

CSSLs, as a permanent genetic resource, allow phenotypic evaluation repeatedly under various environments, making a significant advantage in verifying the stability of QTLs of interest. In the present study, we investigated phenotypic variation in the NIP/9311 CSSL population under three environments and identified eight stable QTLs for plant height. Among them, six loci co-localized in the same or overlapping regions of known genes control plant height (Figure 1d; Table 1). For example, qPH1.2, qPH1.3, and qPH3.2 co-localized with OsGA2ox3, SD1, and GNP1, respectively, which all influence plant height by regulating active gibberellin levels [6,9,24]. qPH3.1 was mapped to a 200 kb region that contains the reported gene SSD1, which determines organ elongation by regulating cell division [25]. qPH4 overlapped with the gene NAL1, which affects plant height by regulating polar auxin transport [10,11,12,13]. qPH8.1 was located near Ghd8, which exhibits a pleiotropic effect on plant height, heading date, and yield [15]. Interestingly, Ghd8 plays an opposite function controlling heading date, delayed flowering under the long-day condition, but promoted it under the short-day condition. It may explain that qPH8.1 was detected at E2 and E3 both under long-day conditions but did not reach a significant level (p = 0.01) at E2, a short-day condition. These results indicate that qPH8.1 (Ghd8) may regulate plant height depending on the environment.
As it contains one or a few specifically introduced segments, the CSSL is an efficient start-up to quickly generate CSSL-derived populations and NILs by a backcrossing scheme to validate and finely map QTLs of interest [26]. In the present study, we detected a minor-effect QTL, qPH8.2, explaining approximately 6% of the phenotypic variance of plant height in the CSSL population and validated it as a major-effect locus that explained 60% of phenotypic variance in the CSSL-derived F2 population. The investigation of NILs revealed a pleiotropic effect of qPH8.2 on various agronomic traits, including plant architecture, heading date, and yield (Figure 3 and Figure 4; Table 1). These data support that the CSSL population provides a powerful tool for identifying minor QTLs.
One of the notable findings in this study is that the NIP alleles at qPH8.2 repressed plant growth and yield-related traits. We observed a significant decrease in plant height, leaf length, and panicle length in NIL-NIP compared to NIP-9311 at the seedling and tillering stages (Figure 4). Furthermore, we delimited qPH8.2 into a 42 kb region. According to the expression profile, the 42 kb insertion region harbors ten expressed genes (Figure 4). Only Loc_Os08g15296 is expressed at the shoot, leaf, and panicle, which aligns with the pleiotropic effect of qPH8.2 mentioned above (Figure 3). Therefore, Loc_Os08g15296 encoding a reaction center protein H, one of the components of the core complex of photosystem II for water-oxidizing and O2-evolving in photosynthesis [27], is the most likely candidate for qPH8.2. Previous studies revealed that the defect in photosynthetic capacity could repress plant growth [28]. We suppose that this photosystem-related gene in the indica background may interfere with photosynthesis. A comparison of the NILs revealed a significant decrease in photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and intercellular CO2 concentration in NIL-NIP compared with NIL-9311 (Figure 4), which provides a piece of supporting data for the hypothesis. However, further transgenic experiments are required to confirm the function of the candidate gene(s).
Many studies have reported that genetic variations, including single nucleotide polymorphisms and SV, are associated with the heritable phenotypic diversity observed within and between species [29]. Understanding the contribution of SV, such as insertion, deletion, duplication, and translocation, to plant phenotypic variation is vital for plant breeders to improve varieties. In rice, a few SV in genes were reported underlying many agronomic traits, such as submergence tolerance [30], phosphorus-deficiency tolerance [31], and plant architecture [32]. However, the function of most SVs between the two main subspecies in rice remains to be determined [19,21]. In the present study, we used the CSSL population that was derived from the japonica NIP and the indica 9311, two representative genome-sequenced cultivars, to identify QTLs for plant height. Further sequence comparison of NIP and 9311 revealed a 42 kb insertion/deletion SV surrounding qPH8.2 that impacts plant growth. Notably, when analyzing more genome-sequenced accessions, we found that this 42 kb insertion occurred predominantly in temperate japonica but not in indica. In addition, the 42 kb segment is absent in wild rice (O. rufipogon) (Table S3), suggesting that it emerged after the differentiation of subspecies and in the domestication process. In breeding programs, many segments along with functional genes introduced from japonica into indica varieties, or vice versa, occur frequently and may facilitate the breeding selection of desirable agronomic traits. Therefore, understanding the SV region such as qPH8.2 that underlies multiple agronomic characters will provide insight into the SV function in plant growth and guide the inter-subspecies introgression breeding in rice.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

A CSSL population consisting of 122 lines was developed by marker-aided backcrossing approach, in which the sequenced japonica cv. Nipponbare as donor parent and the sequenced indica cv. 9311 as a recurrent parent was crossed [22]. The genotypes of the CSSLs were re-analyzed using an SNP chip RICE6K (Illumina) [33]. A bin map based on the recombination breakpoints in the CSSLs was constructed. A total of 387 bins were generated with a median length of 800 kb [22]. The CSSL population was grown in three environments: Hainan, 2016 (E1); Wuhan, 2016 (E2); and Wuhan, 2017 (E3). Each line was planted in a three-row plot with ten plants per row.
To validate the effect of qPH8.2, a CSSL line, CSSL32 was selected to backcross with 9311 to generate a CSSL-derived F2 population for QTL validation. For fine-mapping of qPH8.2, F2 individuals heterozygous at the QTL region were self-pollinated to produce a large segregating population. The recombinant individuals were selected using the markers M8061 and M1077 that flank the target QTL. The near-isogenic lines (NILs) carrying alleles at qPH8.2 within the 9311 background were also developed using a marker-aided backcross scheme. The F2 population and NILs were grown at an experimental field at Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China (30.4° N, 114.2° E). The NILs and progeny of the informative recombinants were grown in a three-row plot with ten plants per row in three replications. Crop management and controlling insects and diseases were carried out following the standard procedures.

4.2. Trait Measurement

Several agronomic traits were evaluated in eight individuals of each CSSL. Plant height was measured by the distance from the soil surface to the top of the main panicle (not including the length of the awn). The heading date was measured by the duration from the sowing to the appearance of the main panicle [34]. A protractor (Sanliang, model 187-101, Guangzhou, China) was employed to measure the angle between the most distant tillers on the two sides of the culm base, and half of the angle was treated as the tiller angle of the plant [35]. At the harvest stage, panicle length, panicle number, grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight, seed setting ratio, and yield per plant were evaluated following the methods described previously [34].
Photosynthetic parameters were measured as described previously [36]. The fully expanded flag leaves on the main stem of each NIL at the heading stage were measured using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400XT, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) between am 9:00 and pm 12:30 on clear days. The light level was 1500 μmol m−2 s−1 provided by red/blue light-emitting diodes. The CO2 concentration of the air entering the leaf chamber and the temperature were adjusted to 400 μmol mol−1 and 30 °C, respectively. The flow rate to the sample cell was 500 μmol s−1. Gas-exchange parameters were recorded once the topmost expanded leaf was enclosed in the chamber and the photosynthesis rate reached a steady state.

4.3. DNA Extraction and Genotype Analysis

Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh, healthy leaves using the CTAB method [37]. The insertion/deletion (Indel) markers (Table S2) were developed according to the sequence variation between NIP and 9311 (http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn, accessed on 4 July 2020) [38]. All Indel and SSR markers were separated using 4% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver stains for visualization [39].

4.4. QTL Mapping

QTL analyses of the normalized data with the bins as markers were performed using a linear ridge regression in the R package “ridge” (http://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 10 September 2018) as described previously [40]. A t-test for the ridge regression coefficients was conducted for each bin, which was taken as an independent variable in the linear ridge regression model. A significance level of p < 0.01 was set as the threshold to declare the presence of a putative QTL in a given bin. If several adjacent bins showed significant p values, then the QTL was tentatively located in the most significant bin with the lowest p value. The variance explained by each QTL (bin) was decomposed by using “lmg” from R with the package “relaimpo” [41]. QTL nomenclature followed the principles suggested by McCouch [42].
QTL analysis in the F2 population was performed using QTL IciMapping V4.1 (http://www.isbreeding.net/software/, accessed on 10 May 2019) [43]. Means and standard deviation were calculated in Microsoft Excel® 2013 software, and one-way ANOVA comparisons were made to determine significant differences.

4.5. The Insertion Analysis in Rice Germplasm

The sequences of the 74 kb region in 86 rice accessions were downloaded from the database of the Rice Resource Center (http://ricerc.sicau.edu.cn/RiceRC/tools/, accessed on 6 July 2023). The sequences were mapped to the NIP genome using minimap2 (v2.26) with parameters of -ax asm20, and the output sam file was converted to a bam file using samtools (v1.14) view. Then, the bam file was sorted and indexed by using samtools sort and samtools index, respectively [44,45].

5. Conclusions

CSSLs have a distinct advantage in genetic dissection for complex quantitative traits in plants. In the present study, we conducted the QTL identification for plant architecture in the NIP/9311 CSSL population and detected eight stable QTLs for plant height across three environments, which explained about 80% of phenotypic variance. Among them, a novel minor-effect QTL (qPH8.2) was validated as a Mendelian locus and finely mapped to a 74 kb region using a CSSL-derived segregating population. Furthermore, this study found a structure variation with the presence/absence of a 42 kb segment containing qPH8.2 between indica and japonica. This segment occurred predominantly in the temperate japonica and adversely affected the plant architecture, yield, and photosynthetic capacity if introduced into the indica varieties. These findings provide insight into the contribution of the structure variation to the phenotypic variation between japonica and indica and offer some resources for evaluating and utilizing the genomic introgression between the two subspecies in rice breeding programs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12183336/s1, Table S1: Single marker analysis of plant height in F2 population; Table S2: The primers used in this study; Table S3: The presence of a 42 kb insertion in different subgroups of rice; Figure S1: An electropherogram of representative marker genotypes in the segregating population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y.; investigation, W.S. and Q.S.; data curation, W.S., Q.S. and Y.S.; resources, Q.S., Y.S. and L.T.; writing—original draft, W.S.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.; funding acquisition, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31971864), Wuhan Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2022021302024850), and the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Kun Xie for assistance in data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wing, R.A.; Purugganan, M.D.; Zhang, Q. The rice genome revolution: From an ancient grain to Green Super Rice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018, 19, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, F.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Yan, X.; Fu, D.; Wu, G. The genetic and molecular basis of crop height based on a rice model. Planta 2018, 247, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hong, J.; Su, S.; Wang, L.; Bai, S.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Betts, N.; Liang, W.; Wang, W.; Shi, J.; et al. Combined genome-wide association study and epistasis analysis reveal multifaceted genetic architectures of plant height in Asian cultivated rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2023, 46, 1295–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Fujisawa, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Ashikari, M.; Iwasaki, Y.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M. Rice dwarf mutant d1, which is defective in the alpha subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein, affects gibberellin signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 11638–11643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Khush, G.S. Green revolution: Preparing for the 21st century. Genome 1999, 42, 646–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sasaki, A.; Ashikari, M.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Itoh, H.; Nishimura, A.; Swapan, D.; Ishiyama, K.; Saito, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Khush, G.S.; et al. Green revolution: A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 2002, 416, 701–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Asano, K.; Takashi, T.; Miura, K.; Qian, Q.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M.; Ashikari, M. Genetic and molecular analysis of utility of sd1 alleles in rice breeding. Breeding Sci. 2007, 57, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oikawa, T.; Koshioka, M.; Kojima, K.; Yoshida, H.; Kawata, M. A role of OsGA20ox1, encoding an isoform of gibberellin 20-oxidase, for regulation of plant stature in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 55, 687–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mi, X.; Shan, J.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Lin, H. The QTL GNP1 encodes GA20ox1, which increases grain number and yield by increasing cytokinin activity in rice panicle meristems. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qi, J.; Qian, Q.; Bu, Q.; Li, S.; Chen, Q.; Sun, J.; Liang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Chu, C.; Li, X.; et al. Mutation of the rice Narrow leaf1 gene, which encodes a novel protein, affects vein patterning and polar auxin transport. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1947–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, D.; Fang, J.; Lou, L.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Yin, L.; Sun, W.; Peng, L.; Guo, B.; Li, X. Characterization of a null allelic mutant of the rice NAL1 gene reveals its role in regulating cell division. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhai, L.; Yan, A.; Shao, K.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xu, J. Large Vascular Bundle Phloem Area 4 enhances grain yield and quality in rice via source-sink-flow. Plant Physiol. 2023, 191, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, W.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Guan, Z.; Yao, Y.; Chang, Y.; Tu, H.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Serine protease NAL1 exerts pleiotropic functions through degradation of TOPLESS-related corepressor in rice. Nat. Plants 2023, 9, 1130–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xue, W.; Xing, Y.; Weng, X.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, W.; Wang, L.; Zhou, H.; Yu, S.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yan, W.; Wang, P.; Chen, H.; Zhou, H.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, S.; Xing, Y.; et al. A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ali, M.L.; Sanchez, P.L.; Yu, S.; Lorieux, M.; Eizenga, G.C. Chromosome segment substitution lines: A powerful tool for the introgression of valuable genes from Oryza wild species into cultivated rice (O. sativa). Rice 2010, 3, 218–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, D.; Sun, W.; Yuan, Z.; Sun, Q.; Fan, K.; Zhang, C.; Yu, S. Identification of a novel QTL and candidate gene associated with grain size using chromosome segment substitution lines in rice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, W.; Mauleon, R.; Hu, Z.; Chebotarov, D.; Tai, S.; Wu, Z.; Li, M.; Zheng, T.; Fuentes, R.; Zhang, F.; et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 2018, 557, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qin, P.; Lu, H.; Du, H.; Wang, H.; Chen, W.; Chen, Z.; He, Q.; Ou, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 2021, 184, 3542–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, F.; Xue, H.; Dong, X.; Li, M.; Zheng, X.; Li, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Wei, C. Long-read sequencing of 111 rice genomes reveals significantly larger pan-genomes. Genome Res. 2022, 32, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shang, L.; Li, X.; He, H.; Yuan, Q.; Song, Y.; Wei, Z.; Lin, H.; Hu, M.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, C.; et al. A super pan-genomic landscape of rice. Cell Res. 2022, 32, 878–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, C.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Tang, X.; Sun, Y.; Yu, S. Genetic dissection of seed dormancy in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by using two mapping populations derived from common parents. Rice 2020, 13, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, C.; Sun, Y.; Wang, D.; Sun, W.; Yu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Yu, S. Dissection of heterotic loci for grain yield using interconnected chromosome segment substitution lines in rice. The Crop J. 2022, 10, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Takehara, S.; Sakuraba, S.; Mikami, B.; Yoshida, H.; Yoshimura, H.; Itoh, A.; Endo, M.; Watanabe, N.; Nagae, T.; Matsuoka, M.; et al. A common allosteric mechanism regulates homeostatic inactivation of auxin and gibberellin. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Asano, K.; Miyao, A.; Hirochika, H.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M.; Ashikari, M. SSD1, which encodes a plant-specific novel protein, controls plant elongation by regulating cell division in rice. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2010, 86, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Balakrishnan, D.; Surapaneni, M.; Mesapogu, S.; Neelamraju, S. Development and use of chromosome segment substitution lines as a genetic resource for crop improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Oliver, T.; Kim, T.; Trinugroho, J.; Cordón-Preciado, V.; Wijayatilake, N.; Bhatia, A.; Rutherford, A.; Cardona, T. The evolution and evolvability of photosystem II. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 2023, 74, 225–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahmad, N.; Zaidi, S.; Mansoor, S. Alternative routes to improving photosynthesis in field crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 958–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, Y.; Bayer, P.; Batley, J.; Edwards, D. Current status of structural variation studies in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 2153–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hattori, Y.; Nagai, K.; Furukawa, S.; Song, X.; Kawano, R.; Sakakibara, H.; Wu, J.; Matsumoto, T.; Yoshimura, A.; Kitano, H.; et al. The ethylene response factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow rice to adapt to deep water. Nature 2009, 460, 1026–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gamuyao, R.; Chin, J.; Pariasca-Tanaka, J.; Pesaresi, P.; Catausan, S.; Dalid, C.; Slamet-Loedin, I.; Tecson-Mendoza, E.; Wissuwa, M.; Heuer, S. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature 2012, 488, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cardoso, C.; Zhang, Y.; Jamil, M.; Hepworth, J.; Charnikhova, T.; Dimkpa, S.; Meharg, C.; Wright, M.; Liu, J.; Meng, X.; et al. Natural variation of rice strigolactone biosynthesis is associated with the deletion of two MAX1 orthologs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2379–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, H.; Xie, W.; Li, J.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, Q. A whole-genome SNP array (RICE6K) for genomic breeding in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, P.; Zhou, G.; Cui, K.; Li, Z.; Yu, S. Clustered QTL for source leaf size and yield traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Breed. 2012, 29, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dong, H.; Zhao, H.; Xie, W.; Han, Z.; Li, G.; Yao, W.; Bai, X.; Hu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Lu, K.; et al. A novel tiller angle gene, TAC3, together with TAC1 and D2 largely determine the natural variation of tiller angle in rice cultivars. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Takai, T.; Adachi, S.; Taguchi-Shiobara, F.; Sanoh-Arai, Y.; Iwasawa, N.; Yoshinaga, S.; Hirose, S.; Taniguchi, Y.; Yamanouchi, U.; Wu, J. A natural variant of NAL1, selected in high-yield rice breeding programs, pleiotropically increases photosynthesis rate. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Murray, M.; Thompson, W. Rapid isolation of high molecular-weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, H.; Yao, W.; Ouyang, Y.; Yang, W.; Wang, G.; Lian, X.; Xing, Y.; Chen, L.; Xie, W. RiceVarMap: A comprehensive database of rice genomic variations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 1018–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Panaud, O.; Chen, X.; McCouch, S. Development of microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Gen Genet. 1996, 252, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, W.; Zhou, Q.; Yao, Y.; Qiu, X.; Xie, K.; Yu, S. Identification of genomic regions and the isoamylase gene for reduced grain chalkiness in rice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grömping, U. Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package relaimpo. J. Stat. Softw. 2006, 17, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McCouch, S.R. Gene nomenclature system for rice. Rice 2008, 1, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Meng, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. QTL IciMapping: Integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. The Crop J. 2015, 3, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, H. Minimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 3094–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, M.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 03336 g001
Figure 1. Overview of the QTLs detected for plant height in the NIP/9311 CSSL population. (a) Difference in plant height between NIP and 9311 (Scale bar, 10 cm); (b) Boxplot of plant height in the CSSLs under three environments. Box edges represent the range of the 25th to the 75th percentiles, with the median value shown by the bold middle line; (c) The phenotypic variation of plant height in the CSSL population; (d) The relative physical position of QTL detected on the rice chromosome. Some reported genes for plant height are indicated by the triangle on top.
Figure 1. Overview of the QTLs detected for plant height in the NIP/9311 CSSL population. (a) Difference in plant height between NIP and 9311 (Scale bar, 10 cm); (b) Boxplot of plant height in the CSSLs under three environments. Box edges represent the range of the 25th to the 75th percentiles, with the median value shown by the bold middle line; (c) The phenotypic variation of plant height in the CSSL population; (d) The relative physical position of QTL detected on the rice chromosome. Some reported genes for plant height are indicated by the triangle on top.
Plants 12 03336 g001
Plants 12 03336 g002
Figure 2. Validation of qPH8.2 effect. (a) Phenotype differences between 9311 (left) and CSSL32 (right) (Scale bar, 10 cm). (b) Graphical genotype of CSSL32 showing the NIP segment at qPH8.2 and three other segments within the 9311 background. (c–e) Comparisons of plant height (c), heading date (d), and tiller angle (e). Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 20). ** denotes significant differences at p < 0.01 by t-test; (f–h) Frequency distribution of plant height (f), heading date (g), and tiller angle (h) of three genotypes assessed by the marker M9060 tightly linked to qPH8.2. 9311, NIP, and Het indicate homozygous 9311, NIP, and heterozygous genotypes at the marker M9060, respectively.
Figure 2. Validation of qPH8.2 effect. (a) Phenotype differences between 9311 (left) and CSSL32 (right) (Scale bar, 10 cm). (b) Graphical genotype of CSSL32 showing the NIP segment at qPH8.2 and three other segments within the 9311 background. (c–e) Comparisons of plant height (c), heading date (d), and tiller angle (e). Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 20). ** denotes significant differences at p < 0.01 by t-test; (f–h) Frequency distribution of plant height (f), heading date (g), and tiller angle (h) of three genotypes assessed by the marker M9060 tightly linked to qPH8.2. 9311, NIP, and Het indicate homozygous 9311, NIP, and heterozygous genotypes at the marker M9060, respectively.
Plants 12 03336 g002
Plants 12 03336 g003
Figure 3. Fine-mapping of qPH8.2. (a) Primary mapping of qPH8.2 in a CSSL-derived F2 population (n = 288) for plant height (PH), heading date (HD), and tiller angle (TA). (b) Fine-mapping of qPH8.2 to a 74 kb interval flanked by the markers M9211 and M9285 using a large population (n = 4200). The overlapped recombinant lines are provided with phenotypes by progeny testing. Values are given as mean ± SD (n = 8). ** denotes significant differences with 9311 at p < 0.01 by t-test. (c) The insertion region contains some promising genes. (d) The expression profile of some candidate genes from the database (http://rice.uga.edu/, accessed on 5 April 2023).
Figure 3. Fine-mapping of qPH8.2. (a) Primary mapping of qPH8.2 in a CSSL-derived F2 population (n = 288) for plant height (PH), heading date (HD), and tiller angle (TA). (b) Fine-mapping of qPH8.2 to a 74 kb interval flanked by the markers M9211 and M9285 using a large population (n = 4200). The overlapped recombinant lines are provided with phenotypes by progeny testing. Values are given as mean ± SD (n = 8). ** denotes significant differences with 9311 at p < 0.01 by t-test. (c) The insertion region contains some promising genes. (d) The expression profile of some candidate genes from the database (http://rice.uga.edu/, accessed on 5 April 2023).
Plants 12 03336 g003
Plants 12 03336 g004
Figure 4. Comparison of agronomic traits and photosynthetic characteristics between NILs of qPH8.2. (a–f) Morphology difference between NIL-9311 and NIL-NIP at the seedling stage with 10 days after germination (a), at the tillering stage with 50 days after germination (b), and at the heading stage (c–f). Scale bar: 10 cm. (g–r) Differences in plant height at the seedling (g), tillering (h), and heading stage (i), internode length (j), panicle length (k), flag leaf length (l), heading date (m), and tiller angle (n), panicle number (o), grain number per panicle (p), 1000-grain weight (q) and yield per plant (r). Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 20). ** denotes significant differences at p < 0.01 by t-test. (s–v) Differences in photosynthetic rate (s), stomatal conductance (t), intercellular CO2 concentration (u), and transpiration rate (v). Data are given as Mean ± SD (n = 3). * and ** denote significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 by t-test, respectively.
Figure 4. Comparison of agronomic traits and photosynthetic characteristics between NILs of qPH8.2. (a–f) Morphology difference between NIL-9311 and NIL-NIP at the seedling stage with 10 days after germination (a), at the tillering stage with 50 days after germination (b), and at the heading stage (c–f). Scale bar: 10 cm. (g–r) Differences in plant height at the seedling (g), tillering (h), and heading stage (i), internode length (j), panicle length (k), flag leaf length (l), heading date (m), and tiller angle (n), panicle number (o), grain number per panicle (p), 1000-grain weight (q) and yield per plant (r). Data are given as mean ± SD (n = 20). ** denotes significant differences at p < 0.01 by t-test. (s–v) Differences in photosynthetic rate (s), stomatal conductance (t), intercellular CO2 concentration (u), and transpiration rate (v). Data are given as Mean ± SD (n = 3). * and ** denote significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 by t-test, respectively.
Plants 12 03336 g004
Table 1. The QTLs identified for plant height in the NIP/9311 CSSL population.
Table 1. The QTLs identified for plant height in the NIP/9311 CSSL population.
Environment aQTLChrInterval (Mb)Effectp ValuePVE (%)Gene
E1qPH1.116.1–7.60.10 1.15 × 10−66.3
qPH1.2130.3–33.30.15 2.00 × 10−1516.6 GA2ox3
qPH1.3138.1–390.20 2.00 × 10−1641.1 SD1
qPH3.1310.3–10.5−0.06 2.37 × 10−33.2 SSD1
qPH3.2334.9–end0.06 9.06 × 10−32.1 GNP1
qPH4431.4–31.6−0.06 4.01 × 10−43.6 NAL1
qPH8.183.5–4−0.03 5.11 × 10−20.7 Ghd8
qPH8.289.1–20.6−0.07 1.46 × 10−45.8
E2qPH1.116.1–7.60.59 4.44 × 10−35.6
qPH1.2130.3–33.30.56 1.65 × 10−711.2 GA2ox3
qPH1.3138.1–391.23 2.00 × 10−1635.2 SD1
qPH3.1310.3–10.5−0.37 6.75 × 10−45.7 SSD1
qPH3.2334.9–end0.65 1.25 × 10−31.7 GNP1
qPH4431.4–31.6−0.26 8.31 × 10−43.0 NAL1
qPH8.183.5–4−0.27 1.91 × 10−32.3 Ghd8
qPH8.289.1–20.6−0.42 1.78 × 10−36.2
E3qPH1.116.1–7.60.70 5.16 × 10−46.1
qPH1.2130.3–33.30.44 2.32 × 10−510.2 GA2ox3
qPH1.3138.1–391.17 2.00 × 10−1636.9 SD1
qPH3.1310.3–10.5−0.42 9.28 × 10−55.2 SSD1
qPH3.2334.9–end0.62 1.40 × 10−31.8 GNP1
qPH4431.4–31.6−0.28 1.75 × 10−45.2 NAL1
qPH8.183.5–4−0.27 1.36 × 10−31.8 Ghd8
qPH8.289.1–20.6−0.38 3.34 × 10−35.9
a E1, Hainan, 2016; E2, Wuhan, 2016; E3, Wuhan, 2017.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, W.; Sun, Q.; Tian, L.; Sun, Y.; Yu, S. A Structure Variation in qPH8.2 Detrimentally Affects Plant Architecture and Yield in Rice. Plants 2023, 12, 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183336

AMA Style

Sun W, Sun Q, Tian L, Sun Y, Yu S. A Structure Variation in qPH8.2 Detrimentally Affects Plant Architecture and Yield in Rice. Plants. 2023; 12(18):3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Wenqiang, Qiang Sun, Li Tian, Yongjian Sun, and Sibin Yu. 2023. "A Structure Variation in qPH8.2 Detrimentally Affects Plant Architecture and Yield in Rice" Plants 12, no. 18: 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183336

APA Style

Sun, W., Sun, Q., Tian, L., Sun, Y., & Yu, S. (2023). A Structure Variation in qPH8.2 Detrimentally Affects Plant Architecture and Yield in Rice. Plants, 12(18), 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop