Next Article in Journal
Allium sphaeronixum (Amaryllidaceae), A New Species from Turkey
Next Article in Special Issue
The Inhibitory Effects and Cytotoxic Activities of the Stem Extract of Nepenthes miranda against Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein and Oral Carcinoma Cells
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Precision Plant Disease Detection Method Based on a Dynamic Pruning Gate Friendly to Low-Computing Platforms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protective Effect of the Phycobiliproteins from Arthrospira maxima on Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Ulcer in a Rat Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Occurrence of Alkenylbenzenes in Plants: Flavours and Possibly Toxic Plant Metabolites

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department Food Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(11), 2075; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112075
Submission received: 26 April 2023 / Revised: 12 May 2023 / Accepted: 18 May 2023 / Published: 23 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacology and Toxicology of Plants and Their Constituents)

Abstract

:
Alkenylbenzenes are naturally occurring secondary plant metabolites. While some of them are proven genotoxic carcinogens, other derivatives need further evaluation to clarify their toxicological properties. Furthermore, data on the occurrence of various alkenylbenzenes in plants, and especially in food products, are still limited. In this review, we tempt to give an overview of the occurrence of potentially toxic alkenylbenzenes in essential oils and extracts from plants used for flavoring purposes of foods. A focus is layed on widely known genotoxic alkenylbenzenes, such as safrole, methyleugenol, and estragole. However, essential oils and extracts that contain other alkenylbenzenes and are also often used for flavoring purposes are considered. This review may re-raise awareness of the need for quantitative occurrence data for alkenylbenzenes in certain plants but especially in final plant food supplements, processed foods, and flavored beverages as the basis for a more reliable exposure assessment of alkenylbenzenes in the future.

1. Introduction

Alkenylbenzenes are known as characteristic flavor constituents of various culinary herbs and spices and are also found in different vegetables and fruits—albeit in lower amounts. They occur as a component of essential oil (EO). Hence, comparatively high concentrations may be found in distillates or alcoholic extracts made of these plants. Such extracts are frequently used for flavoring purposes for various foods and beverages [1].
On the one hand, different secondary plant metabolites, including alkenylbenzenes, are generated in plants—amongst other things—as part of their defense against herbivores and/or pests. On the other hand, animals, as well as humans, possess adapted metabolic capacities for detoxification and are able to eliminate those compounds, e.g., via kidneys. Nevertheless, certain plant metabolites, such as alkenylbenzenes, may pose health risks to humans. Recently, the toxic properties of alkenylbenzenes and the health risks potentially associated with oral exposure to these compounds via the consumption of certain foods were discussed in detail in the context of food safety [2]. In this regard, the genotoxic and carcinogenic potential shown for some well-studied alkenylbenzenes, such as safrole, estragole, methyleugenol, and beta-asarone, is of particular importance. Due to the genotoxic potential of these alkenylbenzenes, the addition of these alkenylbenzenes as such has already been prohibited in the EU via Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008.
In contrast to the abovementioned compounds, the toxicological properties of other alkenylbenzenes, such as myristicin, elemicin, or apiols, are largely unknown [2]. However, structural similarities of those alkenylbenzenes to known genotoxic and carcinogenic alkenylbenzenes, in particular, safrole and methyleugenol, suggest assuming the latter compounds may also have genotoxic properties [3].
Table 1 depicts known chemical structures of alkenylbenzenes that have been found in extracts from certain parts of various plants in highly variable amounts. Most alkenylbenzenes contain a characteristic allylic or propenylic side chain at the benzene ring. The propenylic derivatives may be cis- or trans-configured. Stereochemical side chain configuration and benzene-ring substituents determine the metabolic fate, in turn influencing the genotoxic activity that is mediated by ultimate reactive intermediates.
For some alkenylbenzenes, e.g., estragole, methyleugenol, and safrole, metabolic activation via 1′-hydroxylation followed by sulfo-conjugation and ultimately, the formation of a reactive carbenium ion has been proven (reviewed in more detail by [2,3]), whilst asarones predominantly form genotoxic side chain epoxide intermediates [4,5,6]. Because of the metabolic specificities of alkenylbenzenes, we recently proposed a potential testing strategy to reliably investigate in greater depth mutagenic properties of different alkenylbenzenes in mammalian organisms in relation to the structural characteristics identified so far [7].
In addition to the abovementioned missing toxicological information, the content of different alkenylbenzenes, such as myristicin, elemicin, or apiols in plants as well as in plant-based foods, is less comprehensively reported [2,3]. In this context, many more alkenylbenzenes with similar chemical structures—and probably comparable toxic properties—may be prevailing in edible parts of plants and, thus, will occur to variable extents in extracts of them, too.
Naturally, plants generate alkenylbenzenes to very varying extents, which depend on species, variety, geographical origin, humidity, solar irradiation, maturation state at harvest, parts of the plants collected, and postharvest processing [2,3]. Moreover, different extracts and oils used for food flavoring purposes can be obtained from various parts of edible plants (e.g., leaves, stems, roots, seeds, and fruits), which also affects the content of alkenylbenzenes in the obtained plant-based materials. Moreover, as alkenylbenzene-containing extracts may be used in very variable amounts, it is important to quantify potentially toxic food ingredients not only in the raw ingredients but especially in the final foods and beverages.
Here, we will summarize and discuss the current knowledge on the occurrence of alkenylbenzenes in EOs and extracts of natural origin from herbs, spices, and some vegetables. In this context, we focused on an underlying literature search on those culinary plants exhibiting alkenylbenzene concentrations of at least 1000 ppm in the corresponding EOs. The obtained results regarding toxicologically relevant alkenylbenzenes in plant extracts and EOs were summarized and presented in alphabetical order as listed in Table 2. Therefore, this review, providing a special focus on culinary spices and those plants that might become of interest for flavoring purposes because of their unique ingredients, is seen complementary to other recent reviews on alkenylbenzenes in the plant kingdom, which offer a wider scope and also address further important aspects [8,9,10].

1.1. Occurrence of Alkenylbenzenes in Herbs, Spices, and Some Vegetables

Allspice (Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr., Myrtaceae), also known as pimenta, pimento, and Jamaica pepper, is a tree native mostly to the West Indies, Central America, Mexico, and Venezuela. Allspice, its EO, and its oleoresin (less so) are used in beverages, frozen dairy desserts, candy, baked goods, gelatins and puddings, meat products, condiments, relishes, and others [11]. Methyleugenol (63%) was reported to be the main ingredient of the pimenta berry oil when berries from commercial suppliers in Mexico were extracted by steam-distillation for 2 h at 97 °C using a semi-pilot extractor, but it also contained eugenol (8.3%) [12]. In drastic contrast are results reported by Padmakumari et al. in 2011, which used hydro-distillation of pimenta berries from Jamaica [13]. They reported their pimenta oils contained about 75% eugenol and only 4–9% methyleugenol. The chromatographic results are not shown by these authors. In accordance with these results, however, Nabney and Robinson reported that steam-distillation of dried pimenta berries of Jamaican origin yielded eugenol (69%) as the main alkenylbenzene and smaller amounts of methyleugenol (8.8%) and chavicol (0.3%) as a minor component [14]. Pimenta leaf oils contain eugenol, isoeugenol, and methyleugenol [15]. Later analysis differentiated between alkenylbenzene contents in pimenta dioica leaf oil and berry oil and compared those to data obtained from Pimenta racemosa leaf oils. Peyron et al. found up to 9.6% methyleugenol and up to 83% eugenol in pimenta berry oils and only trace amounts (0.3%) of chavicol [16]. In Pimenta dioica leaves, up to 4.4% methyleugenol and up to 95% eugenol were detected. They also analyzed the leaves of Pimenta racemosa, which contained 11–21% chavicol and 38–75% eugenol. Interestingly, in EOs from the plant Eugenia caryophyllata, which is usually harvested in Africa and Indonesia, almost no methyleugenol but up to 95% eugenol and eugenyl acetate (up to 7%) were found by Peyron and colleagues [16]. There are further reports on EO components from different regional origins on Carribean Islands and Central America of Pimenta dioica trees. The amounts of methyleugenol in EO from pimenta berries is dependent on the individual tree and time of harvest [17]. Thus, EOs from Pimenta berries on the market are presumably characterized by variable amounts of methyleugenol.

1.2. Anise and Star Anise

Anise (Pimpinella anisum L., Umbelliferae, or Apiaceae) is an annual herb native to eastern Mediterranean regions. Anise is endemic (indigenous) to Asia Minor, Egypt, and Greece and is cultivated, e.g., in Turkey, Russia, South Africa, America, and China [18]. However, even with the short season and rather cool climatic conditions in Alberta (Canada), Pimpinella anisum can be cultivated [19]. Steam-distillation of the dried ripe fruits (seeds) yields an oil that is rich in phenylpropanoids with trans-anethole as major component (79–90%) and, depending on the origin of the anise seeds, as well as on the extraction duration and techniques applied, varying amounts of estragole (1.4–7.1%), pseudo-isoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate (1.2–7.4%) methyleugenol (0.1–0.2%), cis-anethole (0.2–0.6%) and isoeugenol (0.03–0.05%). This was quantified using gas chromatography (GC)–mass spectrometry (MS) in conjunction with nuclear magnetic resonance scans to identify unknown preparatively separated fractions [20]. Variations in the EO composition of Pimpinella anisum fruits obtained from different geographical regions of Europe were determined by Orav et al. using capillary-GC and GC-MS techniques [18]. The EO content of the samples ranged from 10 mL/kg up to 54 mL/kg. A total of 21 compounds were identified, and significant quantitative differences were observed among the samples. The major component was trans-anethole (77–94%); the other phenylpropanoids analyzed in oils were trans-pseudoisoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate (0.4–6.4%) and estragole (syn. methylchavicol) (0.5–2.3%). The highest content of trans-anethole (>90%) was found in the samples from Greece, Hungary, Scotland, Lithuania, Italy, and Germany (two samples). EO of anise seeds from Estonia was rich in trans-pseudo-isoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate (6.4%) [18], but also cis-pseudoisoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate can be found in aniseed extracts [21]. In Pimpinella anisum seeds and in other Pimpinella species, such as Pimpinella peregrina, and Pimpinella saxifraga that also contain trans-pseudoisoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate, the respective epoxy-pseudoisoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate was found amongst other esters [22].
Chinese Star Anise (Illicium verum Hook. F., Illiciaceae) is a tree widely grown in southeastern Asia (mainly in China and Vietnam). Steam-hydro-distillation or liquid carbon dioxide-mediated extraction of the dried ripe fruits yields star anise oil, which consists mostly of trans-anethole (89–92%) [23,24,25] but may also contain cis-anethole (0.2–0.7%), estragole (0.5–5.5%) and trans-iso-methyleugenol (0.1%) [23,26,27]. The EO from star anise fruits is used in the confectionery trade, to flavor licorice and other candies, in the baking trade to flavor cakes, cookies and biscuits, and in the liqueur industry.
In contrast, the smaller and somewhat deformed dried ripe seeds and the EOs of which from Japanese Star Anise (Illicium anisatum L., botanical synonym Illicium religiosum Sieb. et Zucc.) are highly poisonous mainly because of its anisatin content [28]. The oil of Japanese Star Anise fruits, Illicium anisatum was analyzed by gas chromatography. The major alkenylbenzenes were methyleugenol (9.8%), safrole (6.6%), myristicin (3.5%), and to a minor extent trans-anethole (1.2%) [29]. Thus, medicinal and food control authorities must ascertain that Japanese star anise is not present in products containing anise and that EOs destined for the preparation of foods are free of Japanese star anise extracts.

1.3. Basil

Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L., Labiatae, or Lamiaceae) is nowadays cultivated in many countries around the world, originating probably from Africa and tropical Asia. The chemodiversity of Ocimum species is large, and Ocimum species have been analyzed for their EO composition in over 50 countries [30,31]. The EO is basically generated from dried leaves and stems (aerial parts of the plant) by steam distillation. In a systematic study of EOs obtained from the aerial parts of seven varieties of Ocimum basilicum, it was found that basil oils may contain, relative to other identified components, high amounts of methyleugenol (9.3–87%) and estragole (0–88% especially in the varieties “Lettuce Leaf” and “Dark Green”) depending on the basil variety, season and the environmental conditions, as well as the maturation state at harvest, such as growth height. A comparison of three EOs from Ocimum basilicum originating from Morocco, France, and Italy revealed, however, only very low amounts of methyleugenol (<0.8%) and amounts of estragole less than 32% [32]. Usually, the estragole levels in EOs from leaves of sweet basil increase when water is scarce [33].
Another alkenylbenzene found in nearly all sweet basil oils investigated is eugenol (0–34%). In that study, the varieties of Ocimum basilicum examined were very rich in methyleugenol (up to 87%) except in “Lettuce Leaf” (lowest contents of methyleugenol 9.2–15%). The methyleugenol content was dependent on solar irradiance, temperature, and relative humidity as determining factors [34].
Other studies on the chemical composition of Ocimum basilicum plants focused on the age and the leaf position at the stem [35], as well as differentiated the EO analysis derived from the flowers, leaves, and stems [36]. Eugenol levels were slightly higher in younger leaves and methyleugenol levels predominated in older leaves, but this phenotype appears to be more affected by leaf position at the stem.
The flowers of basil collected in Turkey contained 58% estragole, 0.2% trans-anethole, and only 0.03% methyleugenol. The respective leaves contained 53% estragole, 0.6% trans-anethole, and 0.2% methyleugenol. Interestingly the basil stems contained less estragole (16%), trans-anethole (0.1%), and methyleugenol (0.06%), but in addition and exclusively found in stems were dill–apiol (50%), apiol (9.5%), elemicin (0.3%), and low amounts of eugenol (0.1%).
It appears that there is still no full clarity on the biosynthetic pathways of alkenylbenzenes in basil species and the environmental factors influencing the expression of biosynthetic enzymes. As discussed by Vani et al. in 2009, chavicol O-methyltransferase identified in crude protein extracts of sweet basil may be responsible for the conversion of chavicol to methylchavicol (estragole) [37]. Eugenol may be transformed into methyleugenol by eugenol O-methyltransferase, both enzymes most likely use S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as the methyl donor. However, the formation of estragole and methyleugenol is strongly dependent on the season and solar irradiance. Estragole contents may even reach 81% if leaves of Ocimum basilicum are extracted with n-hexane instead of hydro-distillation before analysis with GC-MS technology [37]. Using the same techniques, Vani et al. identified high contents of methyleugenol (36–76%) in n-hexane extracts of another basil species Ocimum tenuiflorum (also named Ocimum sanctum), mainly grown in India. Already in 1984, high levels of methyleugenol (>77%) in EO from two varieties of Fijian Ocimum Sanctum (TULSI) varieties were detected [38]. This also highlights that sample preparation and extraction conditions have an impact on the percental distribution of alkenylbenzenes in EOs and plant extracts.
Exposure to estragole and methyleugenol might be low at common use levels of fresh basil, but there are only a few systematic investigations of alkenylbenzene contents in food preparations of various recipes. Moreover, with the consumption of an EO merchandised as a food supplement or the plants being part of dishes in which basil is prepared together with other culinary oils, consumer exposure to alkenylbenzenes may increase considerably. An example is given by Bousova K. et al., who found estragole at a high concentration of 101 mg/kg “Pesto” product [39]. This traditional dish from Genova, Italy, mainly consists of olive oil, hard cheese, pine nuts, garlic, salt, and basil leaves. Very varying levels of estragole in Pesto preparations have been reported (0.05–19 mg/kg versus fresh basil containing 10–16 mg/kg) [40]. Another study reported levels of 3.2–34 mg/kg estragole in “Pesto Genovese” [41]. The same study additionally reported the occurrence of methyleugenol (23–56 mg/kg) and even myristicin (13–16 mg/kg) and, in one sample, apiol (3.4 mg/kg).

1.4. Bay

Bay oil from leaves of Pimenta racemosa (Mill.) J. W. Moore, Myrtaceae, growing in the West Indies (Dominica), the Caribbean islands, and middle America, and processed two months after harvesting, may contain up to 66% eugenol [42], about 22% of chavicol, 43% methyleugenol, and 32% estragole [43]. However, not each bay variety contains all of the mentioned alkenylbenzenes. A lemon-scented oil variety may not contain alkenylbenzenes at all [43]. An anise-scented oil contained much more mehtyleugenol (43%) than chavicol (2.0%) but high amounts of estragole (32%) and less eugenol (4.3%) [43]. Because of their distinct aromata, bay oils were formerly used as ingredients for the formulation of seasonings and sauces. Botanically, the lemon-scented variety has been known as Pimenta acris (Sw.) Kostel var. citrifolia. The anise-scented variety does not appear to have been classified at that time. The West Indian bays are botanically quite distinct from the sweet bay, Laurus nobilis L., which grows in Europe and other temperate zones [43]. Comparison of the composition and odor properties of the steam volatile oil of the leaves of the California “bay” tree (Umbellularia californica) was first made with other well-known “bay” oils from the leaves of Mediterranean bay (Laurus nobilis) and West Indian bay (Pimenta racemosa) by Buttery and colleagues [44]. The Californian bay oil analyzed by Buttery et al. contained 5.4% methyleugenol but very low amounts of other alkenylbenzenes [44]. However, the acute toxicity of California bay tree leaf oils in mice was slightly higher than that of the West Indian bay tree leaf oil or the Mediterranean bay tree leaf oil [45]. Bay leaf oil from Pimenta racemosa may still be used for the production of bay rum and as a flavor eventually at low levels in various foods on the Caribbean islands and the North of South America. The subspecies variants may contain considerably different ranges of concentrations of alkenylbenzenes. The foliar EOs of Pimenta racemosa var. grisea (Kiaerskov) Fosb. are dominated by geraniol (0–86%), methyleugenol (0.30–93%), and/or trans-methyl isoeugenol (0–86%). The foliar EOs of Pimenta racemosa var. hispaniolensis (Urban) Landrum are dominated by 1,8-cineole (0.05–38%), estragole (0–23%), methyleugenol (0–64%). The foliar EOs of Pimenta racemosa var. ozua (Urban and E. Ekman) Landrum are dominated by 1,8-cineole (47–56%), limonene (3.6–30%), and/or α-terpineol (6.7–15%). Commercial bay oil (P. racemosa var. racemosa) is dominated by chavicol (<0.01–16%), eugenol (44–69%), and methyleugenol (0–12%) [46].
Sweet Bay (Laurus nobilis L., Lauraceae) is a tree native to the Mediterranean region. Its leaves are dried and steam-distilled to yield laurel leaf oil. As for the alkenylbenzenes, laurel leaf oil may contain eugenol, methyleugenol, and elemicin, depending on the habitat and maturation state of the leaves. Old leaves in autumn may contain more lipophilic ingredients relative to leaf weight [47,48]. Sweet bay leaves are used as spice and oils, which might be additives to processed foods, including alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, frozen dairy desserts, baked goods, condiments, relishes, and others. A comparison of compositions of the EOs of flowers, leaves, and stems of Laurus nobilis was reported by Fiorini and colleagues [49]. EOs were obtained by hydro-distillation over 2 h, performed using 300 g of fresh flowers, 500 g of fresh leaves, 100 g of bark stem, or 100 g of wood stem. Eugenol and elemicin were not found in oils from leaves and flowers but in 7.8% and 0.8% in wood stem oils, respectively. However, methyleugenol has been detected in all oils analyzed, with 11.8% in leaf oil, 3.1% in flower oil, 4.7% in bark oil, and 16.0% in wood stem oil [49]. A similar kind of study was performed later with oils obtained from fresh bay leaves (Laurus nobilis) that were collected at the North Black Sea region in Turkey [50]. Total concentrations of iso-eugenol, eugenol–methyl–ether, eugenol, and elemicin were below 1% in young leaves, buds, and flowers and below 3% in older leaves. The habitat of a specific plant plays an important role in product quality. GC-MS analysis of the nonpolar fractions (n-hexane extracts) of Laurus nobilis leaves showed different compositions of constituents from wild and cultivated plants. Unlike cultivated plants, wild Laurus nobilis leaf extracts had a considerably higher content of eugenol, elemicin, and methyleugenol. Contents in wild leaves reached 21% for methyleugenol, nearly 5% for elemicin, and 3.1% for eugenol [51]. There have been several studies on EOs obtained from wildly grown Laurus nobilis plants in Iran [52] and France, Algeria, and Tunisia [53,54]. All analytical investigations using different extraction methods showed similar levels of elemicin, eugenol, and methyleugenol in leaves of Laurus nobilis as those reported by Conforti and colleagues [51].

1.5. Carrot

Daucus carota L. subsp. sativus, Umbelliferae or Apiaceae. Carrot oils may be derived by steam distillation from the seeds and by solvent extraction of the roots of the common carrot cultivars. Carrot seed oils are claimed to be used as a flavor ingredient in many categories of food products [11]. There are rare indications of the presence of very small amounts of methylchavicol, methyleugenol, and apiols in carrot seed oils originating from some carrot subspecies and varieties. However, some EOs from Daucus carota subspecies bear high amounts of myristicin or elemicin. Rare EOs have been, e.g., isolated from the myristicin-rich Daucus sahariensis from Algeria [55]. Myristicin has been isolated from leaves (34% of the oil) and from the fruits (44% of the oil) of Daucus sahariensis. However, as usual, the total oil yield from seeds is very low, with only 0.5% w/w from the leaves and only 0.03% w/w from its fruits in the latter study. Another report of Mediterranean Daucus carota L. ssp. maritimus by Jabrane et al. reported a level of 30% of myristicin in the respective root EO [56].
Analysis of EOs obtained from Daucus glaber Forssk., harvested in Egypt [57], identified mainly elemicin (33% in fruit oil), and methyleugenol (2.5% in fruit oil). Similar results were obtained when the EOs and supercritical CO2 extracts of wild Daucus carota L. subsp. carota from two different sites in Tunisia was investigated. Elemicin contents ranged from 1.4% up to 35% depending on the extraction method, the geographical region, and the genetic differences of the carrot varieties [58].
In 1969, Harborne et al. screened 100 species of Umbelliferae drawn from 50 genera for myristicin content by thin-layer chromatography but could not detect myristicin in seeds from cultivated and wild Daucus carota species [59]. The authors concluded that myristicin seemed to be rare as a seed character within the botanical family of the Umbelliferae. However, EOs from seeds of other Umbelliferae, such as dill, parsley, fennel, and parsnip, may also contain considerable amounts of myristicin besides other alkenylbenzenes.
As well, an essential oil obtained from carrot root (Daucus carota L. var. Sativa, type Imperator), amounting to 40 ppm of the carrot root, has been analyzed using capillary and conventional GC separation with characterization by mass and infrared absorption spectrometry. Parsley is in the same family (Umbelliferae) as carrots, and in that carrot root oil myristicin was present at 0.4% of the whole essential root oil isolated [60]. The presence of myristicin in carrot root distillate from the carrot variety “Imperator” was confirmed and quantitated by Wulf et al. to range between 0.5 ppm and 15 ppm relative to the carrot mass of individual carrots [61]. Myristicin contents are very variable in carrot roots with respect to different Carota sativa varieties. The myristicin contents in leaves and roots appear to correlate negatively [62]. Myristicin appears to be one of the compounds involved in the formation of a bitter taste in carrots, and interestingly, concentrations of phenolic volatiles, including myristicin, seem to be boosted by ethylene post-harvest treatments [63].

1.6. Chervil

The volatile oils of Garden chervil (Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm., Umbelliferae or Apiaceae) contain mainly estragole (75–80%) [1]) and 1-allyl-2,4-dimethoxybenzene [64]. Fresh chervil leaves are used as a domestic spice in soups, sauces, salads, vinegar for salad dressings, and omelets, and to season poultry, seafood, and young spring vegetables (such as carrots). Chervil oils from herbs and fruits are used as flavor ingredients for meat products [11].

1.7. Cinnamon

Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume and Cinnamomum cassia J. Presl, Lauraceae, are the most known representatives of cinnamon species. The genus Cinnamomum comprises about 300 species, at least four of which are sources of spice cinnamon [65]. Cinnamon is used as a spice and flavoring agent worldwide. Many different species of plants are commonly referred to as cinnamon. Cinnamon used as a spice in the understanding of the Western world refers to the dried inner bark of C. zeylanicum indigenous to Sri Lanka and southern India.
Other Cinnamomum species, C. cassia (syn. C. aromaticum; Chinese cassia), C. loureiroi (Saigon cassia), and C. burmannii (Indonesian cassia), commonly known as cassia, are also commonly marketed as cinnamon [66]. Ceylon cinnamon is obtained from C. zeylanicum. There is also Indian cinnamon (C. tamala (Buch.-Ham.) T.Nees and Eberm.).
The chemical composition of cinnamon depends on many factors, such as botanical source, climatic conditions, and methods of harvesting and production. Leaves, twigs, bark, and root bark may serve in steam distillation to yield cinnamon oils. Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil is a source of eugenol (up to 92%) [67]. Eugenol is by far the major constituent of Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil (87%), whilst, in contrast, the Ceylon cinnamon bark oil contained only 8.8% eugenol [68]. Analysis of Cinnamomum zeylanicum leaf, stem bark, and root bark oils indicated 72 compounds, of which 32 have not been reported before in Ceylon cinnamon oils [69]. In that study, only 2% cinnamaldehyde, but 70% eugenol, 2.5% eugenyl–acteate, 2.3% safrole, and 0.1% iso-eugenol were detected in commercial cinnamon leaf oils from 2.5-year-old plants. The stem bark oil had only 2.2% eugenol and only traces of safrole but the highest amount of cinnamaldehyde (75%). The root bark oil contained 0.5% eugenol and 0.3% safrole, and only 0.7% cinnamaldehyde.
Cinnamon extracts and oils are extensively used as flavor ingredients in most major categories of food products, and eugenol appears to protect trans-cinnamaldehyde probably by an antioxidative mechanism against thermal decomposition, whilst eugenol is stable at 200 °C up to 40 min [70]. Small amounts of eugenol (0.2–0.5 mg/100 g) were present in cinnamon applesauce and orange juice. Larger amounts of eugenol (18–20 mg/100 g) were present in chai tea, cinnamon cookies, and in cinnamon gingerbread [70]. Other alkenylbenzenes were not looked for in that study.
C. cassia is distributed in China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and other countries. It is commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine and also as a traditional spice. More than 160 compounds have been separated and identified from C. cassia [71,72].

1.8. Clove

Dried flower buds (cloves), stems, and leaves from Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. et Perry, Myrtaceae, a tree growing in tropical zones of Asia, East Africa, and America, is used to produce clove oils. The EO isolated from the buds of Syzygium aromaticum is widely used and well-known for its medicinal properties. Traditional uses of clove oil include use in dental care as an antiseptic and analgesic, where the undiluted oil may be rubbed on the gums to treat toothache. It is active against oral bacteria associated with dental caries and periodontal disease [73]. The steam-volatile constituents of air-dried buds of Syzygium aromaticum were examined by gas chromatography, infrared spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, and mass spectrometry. Eugenol (81%), acetyleugenol (7.3%), and nine other minor components, including chavicol, were identified [74]. The major component of clove oil is usually considered to be eugenol, with β-caryophyllene and lesser amounts of other components such as benzyl alcohol, but the proportions vary widely. The highest concentration in a clove oil from Tunisia following hydro-distillation and gas chromatography was eugenol (89%), and the second most abundant compound was eugenyl acetate (5.6%), followed by β-caryophyllene (1.4%). In view of the known activities of the constituents and the variability of the oil, it is important that the real composition is known [75]. In a clove oil from Egypt, 22 compounds, including eugenol (71%) and eugenyl acetate (7.0%), methyleugenol (0.3%), and estragole (0.4%), were identified [76].

1.9. Dill

Native to the Mediterranean region and Asia, dill plants (Southern European dill Anethum graveolens L. and East Indian dill Anethum sowa L., Apiaceae) are now cultivated worldwide [77]. Oils can be obtained by steam distillation from all parts of the fresh plant. Alkenylbenzenes found in dill oil are dill–apiol, eugenol, anethole, and myristicin in various amounts depending on the species and the geographical region where dill is cultivated. The oils from dill seed (fruit) and dill weed can be differentiated chemically and organoleptically, whereby apiols are predominating in the seed oils. The Anethum sowa seeds may be used as a constituent of curry powders (Dey K.L. 1896 cited in [78]). East Indian dill oils may contain up to 12% or 15% dill–apiol [79] whilst, although morphologically similar, the Anethum graveolens seeds may contain less dill–apiol [80]. Dill–apiol and parsley–apiol, the latter referred to simply as “apiol(e)” in some references, were only found after 3–4 hrs steam-distillation followed by hexane extraction of dill root distillates, but not of dill green distillates, respectively. Dill roots and greens may contain ppm amounts of myristicin [81]. In contrast, hydro-distillation of Anethum graveolens seeds from Saudi Arabia revealed 25% dill–apiol, 0.2% myristicin, 0.2% cis-asarone, and interestingly 0.05% ortho-eugenol, also called 2-methoxy-6-(2-propenyl)phenol or 2-allyl-6-methoxyphenol [82]. The chemical constituents of culinary spices are widely dependent not only on species but also on geographic location, seasonal variation, and methods of extraction and analysis. Uses of dill oils are manifold in many food products, such as dishes for culinary purposes in condiments, relishes, and snacks. Chemically, dill–apiol and parsley–apiol have a common sum formula; however, methoxy-substituents differ with respect to their position at the benzene ring. Dill–apiol was chemically identified as 6-allyl-4,5-dimethoxy-1,3-benzodioxole, whereas parsley–apiol was characterized as 5-allyl-4,7-dimethoxy-1,3-benzodioxole.
Dill–apiol is also found in methanolic extracts of dried leaves of Perilla frutescens BRITTON var. acuta, Labiatae, used in traditional Chinese medicine [83]. In Iran, dried fruits and leaves of Psammogeton canescens, Umbelliferae, are added to soups, cheese, and yogurt for flavoring, and its EO from the aerial parts following hydro-distillation contain up to 15% parsley–apiol and 5% dill–apiol, as determined by GC-MS technology [84]. Some carrot seed oils (from Daucus carota) may also contain up to 3.7% parsley–apiol, and some varieties native to Japan up to 40% trans-alpha-asarone (multiple citations in [85]).

1.10. Elemi

Steam distillation of the resinous exudates of the trees Canarium commune L. or Canarium luzonicum Miq., Burseraceae, native to the Philippines and the Maluku Islands (also called Moluccas, an archipelago in Eastern Indonesia), yields elemi gum (oleoresin) and oil. Amongst many other components, these oils contain elemicin. Although elemi oil may be used mainly as a fragrance component [86], there are notions that it might be used as well for food flavoring purposes [87] and in alternative medicine [88].

1.11. Fennel

The herb fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Umbelliferae, or Apiaceae) is cultivated in many countries of the world. EOs can be obtained by steam distillation of the dried ripe fruits or other parts of the plant, such as leaves, stems, or roots [89]. The common wild fennel is bitter (subsp. vulgare var. vulgare), and the cultivated one is rather sweet (subsp. vulgare var. dulce). EO yields from seeds can be 2–6%, the major constituent of which is usually trans-anethole (60–90%) [90,91]. Depending on the extraction methods used, estragole contents typically vary between 3.3% and 5.3% in the aerial parts of the plant [92]. Trenkle found in the aerial parts of the sweet fennel (stems, leaves, and seeds) trans-anethole (9.7–55%), cis-anethole (0.1–0.8%), and estragole (2.0–3.0%) but no myristicin [89]. However, the fennel roots did neither contain anetholes nor estragole but contained instead dill–apiol (46–63%), myristicin (2.5–10%), and parsley–apiol (0.2%). Usually, European fennel seed varieties yield between 1 and 4% estragole and very high amounts of trans-anethole [93]. Some previous studies on fennel fruit EOs have also mentioned estragole chemotypes in variable amounts, where estragole alone dominates the oil or is present together with either trans-anethole or fenchone. The estragole contents of the EOs from fruits analyzed in the study by Miguel et al. were much higher (up to 88%) than those often reported in the literature for estragole-rich fruit oils [94]. In 2016, Lawrence reported estragole contents in EOs from fennel fruits of not more than 6.8% [95]. However, in oils produced from the leaves and stems of a variety of F. vulgare grown in Ethiopia, Mikre et al. identified estragole contents of up to 88%, indicating the huge differences in EO compositions in fennel EOs on the global market [96]. In a more recent study, Hao and colleagues systematically analyzed nutritional compositions and EO profiles of fruits, umbels, stalks, and roots of one dill and two fennel cultivars [97]. They unequivocally confirmed that there are seeds of cultivars that are very rich in trans-anethole and other seeds of cultivars that are very rich in estragole. The roots of fennel and also those of dill can be distinguished from the aerial parts by the myristicin content [97].
The oil from sweet fennel fruits (commonly known as seeds) is used as a flavoring component in many products. Very common, e.g., in Europe, is the consumption of fennel herbal teas. Determination of estragole in infusions from different widely used commercial herbal teas based on Foeniculum vulgare seeds by an optimized headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by GC-MS analysis revealed levels of estragole to range within 50–250 µg/L [98], or even reach levels from 241 µg/L to 2058 µg/L in teas from teabags [99]. In preparations of tea extracts from herbal tea mixtures (n = 16) of the fennel–anise–caraway type, estragole contents ranged from 4.0 µg/L to 77 µg/L, whilst trans-anethole concentrations ranged from 83 µg/L to 7266 µg/L [100]. Interestingly, one-hour following ingestion of fennel–anise–caraway tea by breastfeeding women, approximately 1% (i.e., 0.13 µg/L milk) of the consumed estragole and up to 5% (i.e., 4.23 µg/L milk) of the consumed trans-anethole were found in human milk of lactating mothers [100]. An earlier study observed a mean concentration of 9.9 µg/L trans-anethole in the milk of breastfeeding women at two hours following ingestion of a 100 mg trans-anethole-containing capsule. Peak concentrations of trans-anethole in human milk were 23.2 µg/L [101].

1.12. Lemon Balm

Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L., Labiatae, or Lamiaceae) is an herb growing in western Asia and the Mediterranean region. EOs from dried leaves and flowers can be obtained by steam distillation. Eugenol may be a constituent of lemon balm EOs (3.5–4.5%), but it does not appear to always occur in the steam volatile fractions of Melissa officinalis leaves [102]. However, eugenylglucoside has been isolated in a pure state from Melissa officinalis leaves [103]. In one EO from a plant grown in Germany but not in two Finnish lemon balm samples, estragole was found (6.3%; [104,105]). Balm extract and oil are used in major categories of food products, including alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, frozen dairy desserts, candy, baked goods, gelatins, and puddings [11]. To our knowledge, the occurrence of other alkenylbenzenes has not been reported so far in the EO of lemon balm.

1.13. Lemon Grass

There are many species in the Cymbopogon genus which are cultivated for their oil, but Cymbopogon winterianus (Java Citronella) is one such species that is native to Sri Lanka and has been domesticated in India for commercial purposes for years. The wide distribution of the genus Cymbopogon is due to its adaptability to diverse climatic conditions. As for oils from lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus) citral is the major component, with myrcene being often the second major component. The lemongrass EO extracted from the leaves is commonly used in different pharmaceuticals, flavors, cosmetics, food preservation, and agriculture industries. Fractional vacuum distillation may be an effective method to upgrade lemongrass EOs and may result in fractions with higher amounts of citral or myrcene [106]. Cymbopogon flexuosus, Gramineae, or Poaceae, also known as East Indian lemongrass, may contain considerable amounts of citral and geraniol. However, oils derived from certain varieties of which may contain up to 20% methyleugenol [107]. Although not very common in lemon grass oils, Guenther reported that Java-type lemon grass might contain eugenol, methyleugenol, and chavicol [108]. In 1973, Wijesekera investigated various species and found only traces of methyleugenol in Java-type lemon grass (Cymbopogon winterianus Jovitt.) [109]. However, in oils from the Cylon-type grass (Cymbopogon nardus) 7.2% iso-methyleugenol and 1.7% methyleugenol were detected [110]. Thus, it may be of relevance to determine the actual alkenylbenzene contents in lemon grass oils, especially if intended to be used for food flavoring purposes [111].

1.14. Lovage

Levisticum officinale W.J.D. Koch (lovage), Apiaceae, is a plant native to south-Western Asia and southern Europe. Among the several species of aromatic plants used in culinary products, Levisticum officinale was once recognized, being considerably used by the condiment industry and by households in soups, stews, and meat dishes [112].
A recent comparison and classification of parsley, lovage, basil, and thyme EOs based on their chemical composition showed that β-phellandrene was the major component identified in parsley and lovage EOs, estragole was the major component in basil EO, and p-cymene was the major component in thyme EO. Except for 0.3% anethole, there were no other alkenylbenzenes identified in lovage EO by the study authors [113]. Recently, a comprehensive study on the nutritional, chemical, and bioactive properties of the edible aerial parts (leaves and stems) of a Portuguese-grown sample of Levisticum officinale was performed. The chemical composition of the EO extracted from the edible aerial parts (leaves and stems) of the Portuguese Levisticum officinale by hydro-distillation did not reveal alkenylbenzenes in this culinary herb [114].

1.15. Nutmeg

Seeds of a tropical tree indigenous to the Maluku Islands of Indonesia (Myristica fragrans Houtt., Myristicaceae) consist of kernel and aril. The Maluku Islands, or the Moluccas, are an archipelago in eastern Indonesia. Mace is the red lacy covering (aril) surrounding the seed and separates the seed from the outer husk (the pericarp). The dried kernels of the ripe seeds are called nutmeg. When the nutmeg powders are hydro-distilled, about 2.4% of crude oil can be obtained, according to Du et al. [115]. These oils are rich in alkenylbenzenes, such as eugenol (20%), methyleugenol (17%), iso-methyleugenol (17%), myristicin (2.3%), as well as safrole (1.6%), and elemicin (1.7%). In contrast, oils from dried kernels of Myristica fragrans originating from Sri Lanka may contain almost no eugenol (0.2%), or methyleugenol (0.6%), nearly equal amounts of safrole (1.4%) and elemicin (2.1%), but higher levels of myristicin (4.9%, [116]). Numerous reports on the composition of nutmeg oils have been published over many years. On the one hand, it is the storage of ground powders (e.g., by [117]; and others: see compilation by [118]), but on the other hand, it is also the geographical origin that determines the volatile compositions of nutmeg extracts as Baldry et al. recognized in 1976 [119]. They showed high variabilities in alkenylbenzene contents, with myristicin ranging from 0.5% to 12%, safrole from 0.1% to 3.2%, elemicin from 0.3% to 4.6%, methyleugenol from 0.1% to 1.2%, and eugenol from 0.1% to 0.7% in different nutmeg oils from West India and South East Asia. The main components of nutmeg EOs from Grenada, Sri Lanka, and East India were compared in 2006 by Reeve [120]. In those EOs, safrole contents ranged from 0.17% up to 1.7%, myristicin from 0.52% up to 10%, and elemicin from 0.37% up to 2.1%. Recent analysis of nutmeg leaves, mace and kernel oils revealed that the highest amounts of myristicin can be found in oils from leaves and mace, of safrole and methyleugenol in mace oils and astonishingly also of γ-asarone in leaf and mace oils from nutmeg trees grown in the Western Ghats of India [121].
Mace powders and mace oils contain similar constituents as kernel powders and kernel oils except for eventually 2–3 times higher levels of myristicin, as demonstrated by preparative thin layer chromatography followed by liquid- or gas-chromatographical methods [122].
Nutmeg and mace are used as domestic spices and as flavor ingredients in many food products such as in gelatins, puddings, sweet sauces, baked goods, meat, fish, pickles (processed vegetables), candy, ice cream, non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages, such as eggnog, and may exist in even more food commodities of various food categories (this issue was reviewed in detail elsewhere [123,124]). In addition, plant food supplements are globally available containing nutmeg seed powders or nutmeg oils to very varying extents [125]. Analytical methods for ground nutmeg, wine, and beer spices, and many food commodities are in place utilizing ultrasonic-assisted extractions as well as solid phase extractions followed by GC-MS analysis [126]. Another study reported 17 mg myristicin per gram of dried nutmeg powder following 12 h methanol extraction at 50 °C [127]. In 22 powdered Indonesian nutmegs extracted with boiling methanol, myristicin accounted for 1.4–2.9%, and safrole accounted for 0.12–0.43% of nutmeg powder [122]
It is important to mention that in addition to the well-known alkenylbenzenes that are usually identified in nutmeg oils, many other compounds, such as diarylpropanoids, were found in Myristica fragrans kernel- and aril-extracts [128,129,130,131]. With advanced analytical technologies, more than 100 substances have been identified (recently reviewed by others [132,133,134]). Some of which do also carry alkenyl groups and may or may not contribute to toxicity. Nowadays, nutmeg consumption of 1.5 g and less of nutmeg powder by human adults can be monitored via the detection of urinary metabolites of safrole, myristicin, and elemicin [135,136].

1.16. Parsley

Garden parsley (Petroselinum sativum Hoffm. and Petroselinum Crispum Mill., Umbelliferae or Apiaceae) is a well-known and widely used domestic herbal spice in Europe and Northern America, either freshly used as culinary garnish or as dried leaves nearly to any kind of food (up to 1.9%) [137]. Parsley seed oil, herb oil, and root oil have different flavors and vary in their composition also, depending on the respective parsley varieties. The composition of the fruits, leaves, and roots of some parsley varieties was thoroughly analyzed by Franz and Glasl already in 1976 [138]. Parsley seed oils may contain parsley–apiol (0.6–79%), myristicin (20–94%), and tetramethoxyallylbenzene (0.1–22%). Parsley leaf oils may contain 3.1–92% myristicin and parsley–apiol (0.7–54%) but no tetramethoxyallylbenzene. Parsley root oils may contain no tetramethoxyallylbenzene but myristicin (6.6–30%) and parsley–apiol (50–77%). In parsley root oils, parsley–apiol always prevails in higher concentrations than myristicin, whilst parsley leaf oils have been found to be in most cases richer in myristicin [139]. Hydro-distillation of parsley seeds for 1 h via a modified Clevenger trap method yielded the highest amounts of alkenylbenzenes in the resulting oils, with about 60% myristicin in a parsley seed oil from Yugoslavia and 22% parsley–apiol in a parsley seed oil from Turkey. The overall yield of EOs from parsley seeds in this study was 0.04% and 0.2%., respectively [140]. When calculated in relation to fresh parsley, parsley–apiol, and myristicin concentrations were reported to amount to 1275 ppm and 1435 ppm, respectively [141]. In 1998, Masanetz and Grosch reported highly variable amounts of myristicin in fresh parsley leaves, ranging between 3.6 ppm and 526 ppm [142]. GC-MS/GC-FID analysis of Petroselinum crispum EOs from Mauritius identified the most dominant components to be myristicin (40%) and elemicin (1.7%) [143].
Parsley and dill teas can be purchased without restriction, and recently, levels of alkenylbenzenes in such herbal teas were investigated. Myristicin, apiols, and also methyleugenol have been detected to very varying extents in dry tea samples or in hot water herbal extracts containing parsley or dill leaves or seeds or being a mixture with other herbs [144]. It has been estimated that health concerns exist if food supplements containing parsley and herbal teas containing large amounts of dill are consumed regularly [145].

1.17. Pepper

One of the widely distributed plant genera in pantropical regions is the genus Piper. Piper plants are also known under the common name “pepper”. The presence of oil cells in the structures of almost all Piper species places them in the group of aromatic plants [146]. Pepper fruits (Piper nigrum L. and others, Piperaceae), a perennial woody vine type plant originating from India and Southeast Asian countries, are extensively used as a domestic spice and as flavoring components in many food products. Different types of black peppers are available, having different colors. The most commonly known peppers are black and white peppers. Black pepper is normally produced by cooking the unripe fruits of the pepper plant in hot water. White pepper is produced from the same plant. After soaking for a few days in water, the berry skin is then rubbed off, resulting in the naked seed. The seeds are then dried. Black pepper is naturally distributed in India, where the Western Ghat forests are rich in this plant. The biodiversity hotspots in this area are reported to be the only known existing source of wild Piper nigrum germplasm in the world [146]. The chemical compositions of Piper nigrum fruit volatile oils from the Aromatic Plant Research Center (APRC) collection were investigated recently by Dosoky et al. [147]. They found that in EOs from fruits of Piper nigrum the trans-β-caryophyllene content dominates, while no alkenylbenzenes were reported. On the other hand, modern multi-analyte methods revealed considerable amounts of alkenylbenzenes in fruits from various Piper species, including Piper nigrum [148]. This study appears as being the first in Europe to determine alkenylbenzenes in pepper fruits as sold on the European market. They found contents of eugenol (10–120 mg/kg), trans-anethole (11–43 mg/kg), and estragole (2.2–46 mg/kg) to be the most abundant alkenylbenzenes. Minor amounts were detected for trans-iso-eugenol (0.69–3.6 mg/kg) and safrole (0.2–3.0 mg/kg).
EOs from Piper species contain variable amounts of alkenylbenzenes. The respective pattern of alkenylbenzenes and their occurrence level depends on geographical region and environmental factors (high humidity and temperatures between 10 °C and 40 °C are needed for growth). Amongst many other compounds, the polar fraction of steam-distilled Ceylon black pepper berry oil contained some eugenol, methyleugenol, safrole, and myristicin [149,150].
Investigations of volatile aroma compounds of the EOs of dried black pepper fruits (Piper nigrum) and black and white “Ashanti pepper” (Piper guineense) from Cameroon by means of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) headspace GC-MS-technology revealed the presence of safrole, methyleugenol, eugenol as well as of sarisan (which is structurally very similar compared to myristicin, previously described as presumably being genotoxic [151]). Occurrence levels in all of the berry oils were below 3%. Elemicin and myristicin were only detected in oils from berries from Piper guineense in concentrations below 1% [152].
The composition of the total volatile oil from the fruits (berries) of “Ashanti pepper” (Piper guineense) originating from Nigeria was investigated in detail by means of GC-MS [153]. Their steam-distilled oily extracts of ripe fruits (berries) contained very high amounts of myristicin (17%), sarisan (16%), safrole (4.8%), elemicin (3.9%), and methyleugenol (1.5%), as well as low amounts of iso-elemicin (0.2%), dill–apiol 0.09%), and eugenol (0.07%). Remarkable is the presence of high amounts of sarisan and myristicin that have not been reported in berries from other Piper species so far.
Some recent comprehensive reviews summarized the findings on volatile constituents of EOs from the leaves of various Piper species, with some of them containing high amounts of myristicin, safrole, and methyleugenol and others containing nearly none of them [146,154,155].
EOs of Piper leaves in which considerable amounts of phenylpropanoid compounds were identified are Piper caninum, Piper auritum, Piper hispidinervum: (safrole); Piper aduncum: (dill–apiol), Piper divaricatum: (safrole) [156], Piper betle: chavibetol; Piper patulum: 1,3,5-trimethoxy-2-propenylbenzene; Piper klotzsdhianum: 2,4,5-trimethoxy-1-propenylbenzene; Piper marginatum: cis-asarone [146]. Sarisan was identified in leaf oils from Piper callosum Ruiz and Pav. from Peru and Mechelia montana Blume from India [157]. In extracts of dried leaves of Piper sarmentosum from the Philippines γ- and α-asarone, sarisan, as well as the very rare exalatacin were identified [158]. Sarisan was earlier described as an isomer of myristicin by Kumamoto and Scora [159] when isolated from leaf oil of Beilschmiedia miersii but also found up to 39% in EO from Piper solmsianum from Brazil [160], and in addition to safrole (18%), up to 74% in Piper affinis hispidinervum [161], and up to 13% in Piper aduncum from Bolivia [162]. Moreover, parsley–apiol was reported to be a constituent of EOs from Indian Piper brachystachium and Piper angustifolium [163]. Amongst safrole and γ-asarone, exalatacin, sarisan, carpacin, croweacin, as well as iso-croweacin were occasionally identified to various amounts in leaf oils from Crowea exalata and Crowea saligna that are native only to the Australian continent but instead of belonging to Piperaceae they are classified as Rutaceae [164].
The EOs of the leaves of three species of Peperomia from the Amazon, Brazil—this genus belongs to Piperaceae, too—were hydro-distilled, and 96 volatile constituents were identified by GC and GC-MS [165]. Therein, very variable amounts of myristicin (0.3–7.6%), elemicin (0.2–1.6%), dill–apiol (0.1–55%), and parsley–apiol (0.95–3.2%) were reported. The aromatic compounds elemicin, myristicin, parsley–apiol, dill–apiol, and in some cases also safrole, have also been found in the Amazon Piper species. Safrole content in Piper rotundifolia, for example, may amount from 0 to 24% [166]. The EO of Piper subespatulata contains up to 49% safrole [167]. For instance, Piper callosum, Piper hispidinervum, and Piper marginatum contain high amounts of safrole (64–98%) [168], and Piper aduncum has very high amounts of dill–apiol (32–97%) [169]. The Peperomia inaequalifolia EO has safrole (32%), 11-H-himachal-4-en-1-ol (25%), and myristicin (13%) as its main chemical constituents [170]. Peperomia pellucida EO presents as major compounds carotol (27–32%), dill–apiol (25–30%), and pygmaein (5.5–11%) [171]. The relative chemical composition of EO derived from fresh or dry material from the whole plant devoid of spikes of Peperomia circinnata Link var. circinnata was different depending on the harvest period. In total, 38 compounds in the EOs extracted in different seasonal periods were identified, with elemicin concentrations ranging between 1.1 and 22%. The highest concentrations of elemicin were present in EOs extracted in July and January, with 14–22%, marginal levels in September (up to 1.1%), and even full absence in November, March, and May. In addition, a subgroup obtained from fresh spikes (January, March, and May) was characterized by the presence of methyleugenol (27–32%) instead [172].
This short overview speaks in favor of a need for a much broader analysis of alkenylbenzenes in pepper fruits and leaves than performed so far, but depending on the season of harvest. In addition to anethole, estragole, eugenol, safrole, and methyleugenol, other alkenylbenzenes, such as myrisicin, elemicin, parsley–apiol, dill–apiol, sarisan, exalatacin, asarones and their iso-forms may have to be taken up into the analytical portfolio for pepper product surveillance if alkenylbenzene exposures of consumers through pepper species are to be properly addressed. Having a high probability of exerting adverse health effects, myristicin and estragole have at least been proposed for future food monitoring activities in spices and herbs [173].

1.18. Purple Haze

Agastache foeniculum (Pursh) Ktze. (=Lophanthus anisatus Benth.), Labiatae, is a perennial, EO-containing plant native to North America. Natives have used this plant for preparing beverages, as a spice in foods, and against colds. The composition of the EO of Agastache foeniculum is hardly known. The aerial parts of this plant contain 0.1–0.3% EO. Up to date, estragole (40–93%) and methyleugenol (28–44%) have been reported as the main components of the oil. However, if Agastache foeniculum of Canadian origin was cultivated in Finland, methyleugenol contents were marginally low (0.2%) whilst estragole contents were in the expected range at about 75% [104].

1.19. Tarragon

Tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L., Compositae, or Asteraceae) also exists in various varieties. The well-known French tarragon is steril, whereas the Russian variety produces seeds and is a perennial herb. The leaves are used to produce EOs via steam distillation. Estragole is often reported to be the main component of the Western European tarragon oils (69%) [174] and 60% [175], with very low amounts of methyleugenol (0.5%) [175]. Usually, estragole levels in tarragon oils vary between 60% and 75% [176] but can also be lower (17%) [177], in this case, with higher amounts of methyleugenol (29%). Alkenylbenzene components in tarragon oils may vary much with the season, geographic location, and with the process of steam distillation. Other components of the group of alkenylbenzenes could be found mainly in the Russian tarragon variety produced from seeds, such as methyleugenol (9.6–28%), trans-iso-methyleugenol (0.08–1.4%), and astonishingly high amounts of elemicin (21–39%) and some trans-iso-elemicin (0.2–0.4%), but in that case only low amounts of estragole (0.3%), as described by Lawrence [178]. Tarragon leaves are used as a domestic herb in soups and sauces such as “sauce bernaise”, pickled vegetables and salad dressings, baked goods, soft candy, meat products, and frozen dairy [176].

1.20. Ylang-Ylang

Cananga odorata Hook Fil. et Thomson. forma macrophylla, Annonaceae, is a large tree with fragrant flowers native to islands of tropical Asia. A similar species is Canangium odoratum Baill. forma genuina (=ylang-ylang) [1,179]. Ylang-ylang is one of the plants that are exploited at a large scale for its EO, which is an important raw material for the fragrance industry. The EOs extracted via steam distillation from the plant have been used mainly in the cosmetic industry but also in the food industry. A wide range of chemical compounds, including monoterpene, sesquiterpenes, and phenylpropanoids, have been isolated from this plant [180]. Generally, the EOs can be extracted from the aromatic plants by steam- or hydro-distillation. However, various combinations of extraction methods are necessary to extract all the volatile phytochemicals present in Cananga odorata. In addition to the steam- and hydro-distillation extraction methods, simultaneous steam-distillation-solvent extraction and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were also used to completely isolate most of the volatile secondary metabolites of the ylang-ylang flower. Following such extraction procedures, anethole (0.3–0.6%) as well as methyleugenol (0.2–1.5%) were detected in EOs of different Colombian origins [181,182]. Headspace Solid-phase Microextraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) was used to characterize all the volatile compounds of Cananga odorata flower at different stages of development. The full-flowering stage appears to be the most suitable period for Cananga odorata flower harvest. Estragole was the only alkenylbenzene found. It occurered only in the developmental display-petal stage II (0.14%) and the full-flowering stage IV (0.13%; [183]). In contrast, Stashenko et al. found anethole (0.3%), iso-eugenol (1.0%), and methyleugenol (2.0%) in EOs, extracted from green flowers of intermediate maturity of Colombian ylang-ylang [184]. 161 individual compounds were identified in both low and high boiling fractions issued from distillation of mature ylang-ylang flowers. Amongst them, only traces of trans-anethole, eugenol, and iso-eugonal, but no safrole in EOs of ylang-ylang flowers were found [185]. None of the modern analytical techniques identified safrole as a constituent of ylang-ylang flower oils, in contrast to an earlier analysis using GC that assumed the presence of safrole and iso-safrole in commercial oils of Cananga odorata flowers [186]. In 1986, Gaydou et al. also reported safrole to be a component of the oxygenated fraction of the ylang-ylang EO, first grade, albeit to a very low amount of 0.1%, in addition to methyleugenol (0.2%) and eugenol (0.5%) [187].

2. Discussion

The most prominent examples of essential oils used in food and beverages are those produced from basil, fennel, tarragon, parsley, anis, star anis, nutmeg, and mace [188]. In general, plant-based powders, extracts, and oils used for flavoring of food are obtained from plant components by grinding and drying, hydro-distillation, steam-distillation, solvent extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, ultrasound- or microwave-assisted extractions, or a combination of diverse techniques [189,190,191]. The analytical data reviewed in this article demonstrate that the composition of EOs and extracts from plants is highly variable. This is not only due to the use of different species and variants but also dependent on geographic location, seasonal influences, and methods of extraction.
From a toxicological point of view, it is remarkable that plant-derived EOs and extracts often contain different potentially genotoxic and carcinogenic alkenylbenzenes, albeit they are frequently used for flavoring purposes in foods and beverages. Interestingly, parsley, commonly used as a culinary herb, was recently rendered the status “poisonous plant of the year 2023” by a botanical garden in Germany due to its content of myristicin and apiol [192]. Moreover, their usage in plant food supplements (PFS) may lead to exceptionally high exposure to alkenylbenzenes [125,145].
Due to the proven toxicological relevance, analytical studies of EOs are often focussing on the occurrence of the known genotoxic and carcinogenic alkenylbenzenes safrole, estragole, and methyleugenol [19,39,40]. However, as depicted in Table 1, it is expected that not-so-commonly known alkenylbenzenes, e.g., elemicin or apiols, also prevail in flavored products. Together, the aforementioned points speak in favor of the need for broader chemical analysis of alkenylbenzenes (and their combinations) in commercially used oils and extracts from herbs, spices, vegetables, and fruits, as well as in PFS, flavored foods, and beverages. Broader in the sense that a larger set of alkenylbenzenes should be taken into consideration.
Of note, the analytical method—especially the extraction procedure—may have an impact on the analytical results. Depending on the oil, extract, or food matrix, different sample preparation methods are currently in place to analyze the alkenylbenzenes [124,127]. For example, methods for analyzing ground nutmeg, wine and beer spices, and many food commodities are in place utilizing ultrasonic-assisted extractions in combination with solid phase extraction followed by GC-MS [193]. Another common method includes liquid-liquid microextraction of phenylpropenes from several different EOs, followed by GC-MS analysis [194]. Further approaches involve methanolic extracts from nutmeg powders that were analyzed by photodiodic array detection following ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) separation [125] or utilize technologies with functionalized magnetic microspheres for isolation of allyl-benzodioxoles such as myristicin and safrole from soft-drinks followed by GC-MS analysis [195].
Most recently, Dang and Quirino developed, described, and compared modern reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and stacking-micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) methods for the determination of alkenylbenzenes in flavors [196,197]. They found that the analytical performance of HPLC was better than that of the stacking-MEKC method. Moreover, they concluded that hydro-distillation was applicable for the extraction of EOs, whereas extractions of complex food matrices deserve other techniques, such as liquid–liquid extraction, liquid-phase microextraction, or solid-phase extraction.
At least some alkenylbenzenes pose a potential genotoxic hazard. Consumer exposure to these compounds should therefore be as low as reasonably achievable. Noteworthy, it is so far not transparent to authorities in which food products, beverages, or PFS mixtures of alkenylbenzenes are present and to which quantities. This, in turn, hampers the assessment of potential health risks.
Standardized procedures for the quantifications of estragole, isosafrole, safrole, methyleugenol, and β-asarone in tea infusions via GC-MS are already established in Germany [198]. For estragole, another valid DIN-standard method exists in Germany for its quantification in fennel teas and other tea-like infusions [199]. Standardized analytical procedures for the determination of all other alkenylbenzenes, including myristicin, elemicin, parsley–apiol, dill–apiol, and their iso-forms, and others (Table 1), in many food matrices still need to be established and validated.

3. Conclusions

The data discussed in this article clearly show that the contents of toxic alkenylbenzenes, such as estragole, methyleugenol, and safrole, highly vary between different plants as well as in parts of the same plant used as food or for food manufacturing. Moreover, reliable analytical methods are needed for the assessment of further, less well-studied alkenylbenzenes, such as elemicin, apiols, and others, in relevant food matrices. In this context, it is important to quantify alkenylbenzenes not only in extracts and oils but also in final food products and beverages that are known to be flavored with oils and extracts from plants that are rich in alkenylbenzenes. Unless this endeavor is tackled sincerely, a realistic exposure assessment depending on consumer habits will be hampered.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.G. and A.E.; writing—original draft preparation M.E.G., A.E., J.F., B.S. (Benjamin Sachse), and B.S. (Bernd Schäfer); writing—review and editing, M.E.G., A.E., J.F., B.S. (Benjamin Sachse), and B.S. (Bernd Schäfer). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Burdock, G.A. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients, 6th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisenreich, A.; Götz, M.E.; Sachse, B.; Monien, B.H.; Herrmann, K.; Schäfer, B. Alkenylbenzenes in foods: Aspects impeding the evaluation of adverse health effects. Foods 2021, 10, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Götz, M.E.; Sachse, B.; Schäfer, B.; Eisenreich, A. Myristicin and Elemicin: Potentially Toxic Alkenylbenzenes in Food. Foods 2022, 11, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cartus, A.T.; Stegmüller, S.; Simson, N.; Wahl, A.; Neef, S.; Kelm, H.; Schrenk, D. Hepatic Metabolism of Carcinogenic β-Asarone. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015, 28, 1760–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Berg, K.; Bischoff, R.; Stegmüller, S.; Cartus, A.; Schrenk, D. Comparative investigation of the mutagenicity of propenylic and allylic asarone isomers in the Ames fluctuation assay. Mutagenesis 2016, 31, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cartus, A.T.; Schrenk, D. Metabolism of carcinogenic alpha-asarone by human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2020, 393, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Götz, M.E.; Eisenreich, A.; Sachse, B.; Herrmann, K.; Schäfer, B. P08-04 Mutagenicity testing of alkenylbenzenes: Need for refined approaches due to sulfotransferase-mediated bioactivation. Toxicol. Lett. 2022, 368, S142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atkinson, R.G. Phenylpropenes: Occurrence, Distribution, and Biosynthesis in Fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2259–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prinsloo, G.; Nogemane, N. The effects of season and water availability on chemical composition, secondary metabolites and biological activity in plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Prinsloo, G.; Nogemane, N.; Street, R. The use of plants containing genotoxic carcinogens as foods and medicine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 116, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leung, A.Y.; Foster, S. Encyclopedia of Common Natural Ingredients: Used in Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Martinez-Velazquez, M.; Castillo-Herrera, G.A.; Rosario-Cruz, R.; Flores-Fernandez, J.M.; Lopez-Ramirez, J.; Hernandez-Gutierrez, R.; Del Carmen Lugo-Cervantes, E. Acaricidal effect and chemical composition of essential oils extracted from Cuminum cyminum, Pimenta dioica and Ocimum basilicum against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol. Res. 2011, 108, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Padmakumari, K.P.; Sasidharan, I.; Sreekumar, M.M. Composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil of pimento (Pimenta dioica (L) Merr.) from Jamaica. Nat. Prod. Res. 2011, 25, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nabney, J.; Robinson, F.V. Constituents of pimento berry oil (Pimenta dioica). Flavour Ind. 1972, 3, 50–51. [Google Scholar]
  15. Veek, M.E.; Russel, G.F. Chemical and sensory properties of pimento leaf oil. J. Food Sci. 1973, 38, 1028–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peyron, L.; Acchiardi, J.; Bignotti, D.; Pellerin, P. Baies de pimenta dioïca L., comparaison des extraits provenant de technologies diverses. In Proceedings of the Perfumes and Flavours Symphony of Nature, Technical Data No. 128 VIIIth International Congress of Essential Oils 1980 in Cannes-Grasse, Fedarom, Cannes-Grasse, France, 12–17 October 1980; pp. 433–441. [Google Scholar]
  17. Green, C.L.; Espinosa, F. Jamaican and Central American Pimento (Allspice; Pimenta dioica): Characterization of flavour differences and other distinguishing features. Dev. Food Sci. 1988, 18, 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  18. Orav, A.; Raal, A.; Arak, E. Essential oil composition of Pimpinella anisum L. fruits from various European countries. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 22, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Embong, M.B.; Hadziyev, D.; Molnar, S. Essential oils from spices grown in Alberta. Anise oil (Pimpinella anisum). Can. J. Plant Sci. 1977, 57, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Anastasopoulou, E.; Graikou, K.; Ganos, C.; Calapai, G.; Chinou, I. Pimpinella anisum seeds essential oil from Lesvos island: Effect of hydrodistillation time, comparison of its aromatic profile with other samples of the Greek market. Safe use. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 135, 110875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rodrigues, V.M.; Rosa, P.T.; Marques, M.O.; Petenate, A.J.; Meireles, M.A. Supercritical extraction of essential oil from aniseed (Pimpinella anisum L) using CO2: Solubility, kinetics, and composition data. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1518–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kubeczka, K.-H.; Bohn, I.; Formaček, V. New constituents from the essential oils of pimpinella species. In Progress in Essential Oil Research; Brunke, E.-J., Ed.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 279–298. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bricout, J. Sur la constitution de l’huile essentielle de badiane. Bull. Société Chim. Fr. 1974, 384, 1901–1903. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, J.; Gong, Y.; Chen, X.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, W. Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Illicium verum fruit and its main component trans-anethole. Molecules 2010, 15, 7558–7569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tuan, D.Q.; Ilangantileke, S.G. Liquid CO2 extraction of essential oil from star anise fruits (Illicium verum H.). J. Food Eng. 1997, 31, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cu, J.-Q.; Perineau, F.; Goepfert, G. GC/MS Analysis of Star Anise Oil. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1990, 2, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Maack, F.; Brunet, D.; Malnati, J.C.; Estienne, J. Study of the minor constituents of anethol obtained from the essence of Chinese anise. Contribution to the search for the origins of anethol by sesquiterpene identification [Illicum verum]. Ann. Des. Falsif.L’expertise Chim. Toxicol. 1982, 75, 357–367. [Google Scholar]
  28. Johanns, E.S.D.; Van der Kolk, L.E.; Van Gemert, H.M.A.; Sijben, A.E.J.; Peters, P.W.J.; De Vries, I. Een epidemie van epileptische aanvallen na drinken van kruidenthee. Ned. Tijdschr. Voor Geneeskd. 2002, 146, 813–816. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cook, W.B.; Howard, A.S. The essential oil of Illicium anisatum Linn. Can. J. Chem. 1966, 44, 2461–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gurav, T.P.; Dholakia, B.B.; Giri, A.P. A glance at the chemodiversity of Ocimum species: Trends, implications, and strategies for the quality and yield improvement of essential oil. Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, 879–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lawrence, B.M. Further examination of the variation of Ocimum basilicum L. In Flavours and Fragrances: A Word Perspective. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Essential Oils, Fragrances and Flavors, Washington, DC, USA, 16–20 November 1986; Lawrence, B.M., Mookherjee, B.D., Willis, B.J., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers B.V: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zola, A.; Garnero, J. Contribution a L’etude de quelques essences de Basilic de type Europeen. Parfums Cosm. Sav. France 1973, 3, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  33. Simon, J.E.; Reiss-Bubenheim, D.; Joly, R.J.; Charles, D.J. Water Stress-Induced Alterations in Essential Oil Content and Composition of Sweet Basil. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Muráriková, A.; Ťažký, A.; Neugebauerová, J.; Planková, A.; Jampílek, J.; Mučaji, P.; Mikuš, P. Characterization of essential oil composition in different basil species and pot cultures by a GC-MS method. Molecules 2017, 22, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fischer, R.; Nitzan, N.; Chaimovitsh, D.; Rubin, B.; Dudai, N. Variation in essential oil composition within individual leaves of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) is more affected by leaf position than by leaf age. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 4913–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chalchat, J.C.; Özcan, M.M. Comparative essential oil composition of flowers, leaves and stems of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) used as herb. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vani, S.R.; Cheng, S.F.; Chuah, C.H. Comparative study of volatile compounds from genus Ocimum. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2009, 6, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brophy, J.; Jogia, M.K. Essential oils from two varieties of Fijian Ocimum sanctum (Tulsi). Fiji Agric. J. 1984, 46, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bousova, K.; Mittendorf, K.; Senyuva, H. A solid-phase microextraction GC/MS/MS method for rapid quantitative analysis of food and beverages for the presence of legally restricted biologically active flavorings. J. AOAC Int. 2011, 94, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Siano, F.; Ghizzoni, C.; Gionfriddo, F.; Colombo, E.; Servillo, L.; Castaldo, D. Determination of estragole, safrole and eugenol methyl ether in food products. Food Chem. 2003, 81, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Malahmeh, A.J.; Al-ajlouni, A.M.; Wesseling, S.; Vervoort, J.; Rietjens, I.M.C.M. Determination and risk assessment of naturally occurring genotoxic and carcinogenic alkenylbenzenes in basil-containing sauce of pesto. Toxicol. Rep. 2017, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Analytical Methods Committee. Application of gas-liquid chromatography to the analysis of essential oils. Part IV. Determination of eugenol in oil of bay (Pimenta racemosa, Miller). Analyst 1975, 100, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McHale, D.; Laurie, W.A.; Woof, M.A. Composition of West Indian bay oils. Food Chem. 1977, 2, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Buttery, R.G.; Black, D.R.; Guadagni, D.G.; Ling, L.C.; Teranishi, R.; Connolly, G. California Bay Oil. I. Constituents, Odor Properties. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1974, 22, 773–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. MacGregor, J.T.; Layton, L.L.; Buttery, R.G. California bay oil. II. Biological effects of constituents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1974, 22, 777–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tucker, A.O.; Maciarello, M.J.; Adams, R.P.; Landrum, L.R.; Zanoni, T.A. Volatile leaf oils of Caribbean Myrtaceae. I. Three varieties of Pimenta racemosa (Miller) J. Moore of the Dominican Republic and the commercial bay oil. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1991, 3, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hokwerda, H.; Bos, R.; Tattje, D.H.; Malingre, T.M. Composition of essential oils of Laurus nobilis, L. nobilis var. angustifolia and Laurus azorica. Planta Med. 1982, 44, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Putievsky, E.; Ravid, U.; Snir, N.; Sanderovich, D. The essential oils from cultivated bay laurel. Israel J. Bot. 1984, 33, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  49. Fiorini, C.; Fourasté, I.; David, B.; Bessière, J.M. Composition of the flower, leaf and stem essential oils from Laurus nobilis L. Flavour Fragr. J. 1997, 12, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kilic, A.; Hafizoglu, H.; Kollmannsberger, H.; Nitz, S. Volatile constituents and key odorants in leaves, buds, flowers, and fruits of Laurus nobilis L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1601–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Conforti, F.; Statti, G.; Uzunov, D.; Menichini, F. Comparative chemical composition and antioxidant activities of wild and cultivated Laurus nobilis L. leaves and Foeniculum vulgare subsp. piperitum (Ucria) coutinho seeds. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 2056–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Verdian-rizi, M.; Hadjiakhoondi, A. Essential oil composition of Laurus nobilis L. of different growth stages growing in Iran. Z. Für Nat. C 2008, 63, 785–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marzouki, H.; Khaldi, A.; Marongiu, B.; Piras, A.; Harzallah-Skhiri, F. Chemical polymorphism of essential oils from populations of Laurus nobilis grown on Tunisia, Algeria and France. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 1483–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Marzouki, H.; Piras, A.; Salah, K.B.; Medini, H.; Pivetta, T.; Bouzid, S.; Marongiu, B.; Falconieri, D. Essential oil composition and variability of Laurus nobilis L. growing in Tunisia, comparison and chemometric investigation of different plant organs. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Smaili, T.; Zellagui, A.; Cioni, P.L.; Flamini, G. A myristicin-rich essential oil from Daucus sahariensis growing in Algeria. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jabrane, A.; Jannet, H.B.; Harzallah-Skhiri, F.; Mastouri, M.; Casanova, J.; Mighri, Z. Flower and root oils of the Tunisian Daucus carota L. ssp. maritimus (Apiaceae): Integrated analyses by GC, GC/MS, and 13C-NMR spectroscopy, and in vitro antibacterial activity. Chem. Biodivers. 2009, 6, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mansour, E.S.S.; Maatooq, G.T.; Khalil, A.T.; Marwan, E.S.M.; Sallam, A.A. Essential oil of Daucus glaber Forssk. Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C J. Biosci. 2004, 59, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Marzouki, H.; Khaldi, A.; Falconieri, D.; Piras, A.; Marongiu, B.; Molicotti, P.; Zanetti, S. Essential oils of Daucus carota subsp. carota of Tunisia obtained by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1955–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Harborne, J.B.; Heywood, V.H.; Williams, C.A. Distribution of myristicin in seeds of the Umbelliferae. Phytochemistry 1969, 8, 1729–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Buttery, R.G.; Seifert, R.M.; Guadagni, D.G.; Black, D.R.; Ling, L.C. Characterization of Some Volatile Constituents of Carrots. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1968, 16, 1009–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wulf, L.W.; Nagel, C.W.; Branen, A.L. Analysis of Myristicin and Falcarinol in Carrots by High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1978, 26, 1390–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ulrich, D.; Nothnagel, T.; Schulz, H. Influence of cultivar and harvest year on the volatile profiles of leaves and roots of carrots (Daucus carota spp. sativus Hoffm.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3348–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kramer, M.; Bufler, G.; Ulrich, D.; Leitenberger, M.; Conrad, J.; Carle, R.; Kammerer, D.R. Effect of ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene on bitter compounds in carrots (Daucus carota L.). Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2012, 73, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zwaving, J.H.; Smith, D.; Bos, R. The essential oil of chervil, Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm. Isolation of 1-allyl-2, 4-dimethoxybenzene. Pharm. Weekbl. 1971, 106, 182–189. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Rao, L.J. Chemistry, biogenesis, and biological activities of Cinnamomum zeylanicum. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Avula, B.; Smillie, T.J.; Wang, Y.H.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Khan, I.A. Authentication of true cinnamon (Cinnamon verum) utilising direct analysis in real time (DART)-QToF-MS. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess 2015, 32, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Angmor, J.E.; Dicks, D.M.; Evans, W.C.; Santra, D.K. Studies on Cinnamomum zeylanicum. Planta Med. 1972, 21, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wijesekera, R.O.B.; Jayewardene, A.L.; Rajapakse, L.S. Volatile constituents of leaf, stem and root oils of cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum). J. Sci. Food Agric. 1974, 25, 1211–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Senanayake, U.M.; Lee, T.H.; Wills, R.B.H. Volatile constituents of cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) oils. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1978, 26, 822–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Friedman, M.; Kozukue, N.; Harden, L.A. Cinnamaldehyde content in foods determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 5702–5709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, J.; Su, B.; Jiang, H.; Cui, N.; Yu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y. Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities of the genus Cinnamomum (Lauraceae): A review. Fitoterapia 2020, 146, 104675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, C.; Fan, L.; Fan, S.; Wang, J.; Luo, T.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yu, L. Cinnamomum cassia Presl: A Review of Its Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Toxicology. Molecules 2019, 24, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cai, L.; Wu, C.D. Compounds from Syzygium aromaticum possessing growth inhibitory activity against oral pathogens. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 987–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Deyama, T.; Horiguchi, T. Studies on the components of essential oil of clove (Eugenia caryophyllata Thumberg). Yakugaku Zasshi 1971, 91, 1383–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chaieb, K.; Hajlaoui, H.; Zmantar, T.; Kahla-Nakbi, A.B.; Rouabhia, M.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A. The chemical composition and biological activity of clove essential oil, Eugenia caryophyllata (Syzigium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): A short review. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. El-Garawani, I.M.; El-Nabi, S.H.; Dawoud, G.T.; Esmail, S.M.; Abdel Moneim, A.E. Triggering of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by fennel and clove oils in Caco-2 cells: The role of combination. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2019, 29, 710–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Salzer, U.J. The analysis of essential oils and extracts (oleoresins) from seasonings--a critical review. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1977, 9, 345–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Baslas, R.K.; Gupta, R.; Baslas, K.K. Chemical examination of essential oils from plants of genus Anethum (Umbelliferae)--oil of seeds of Anethum graveolens. I. Flavour Ind. 1971, 2, 241–245. [Google Scholar]
  79. Shah, C.S.; Qadry, J.S.; Chauhan, M.G. Constituents of two varieties of Indian dill. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1971, 23, 448–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bandopadhyay, M.; Pardeshi, N.P.; Seshadri, T.R. Comparative study of Anethum graveolens and Anethum sowa. Cur. Sci. 1972, 41, 50–51. [Google Scholar]
  81. Lichtenstein, E.P.; Liang, T.T.; Schulz, K.R.; Schnoes, H.K.; Carter, G.T. Insecticidal and synergistic components isolated from dill plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1974, 22, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Al-Sheddi, E.S.; Al-Zaid, N.A.; Al-Oqail, M.M.; Al-Massarani, S.M.; El-Gamal, A.A.; Farshori, N.N. Evaluation of cytotoxicity, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by Anethum graveolens L. essential oil in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Honda, G.; Koezuka, Y.; Tabata, M. Isolation of dillapiol from a chemotype of Perilla frutescens as an active principle for prolonging hexobarbital-induced sleep. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 3153–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kazemi, M.; Rostami, H. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oil of Psammogeton canescens. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lawrence, B.M. Progress in essential oils. Perfum. Flavorist 1990, 15, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  86. Opdyke, D.L. Elemi oil. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1976, 14, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. De Vincenzi, M.; De Vincenzi, A.; Silano, M. Constituents of aromatic plants: Elemicin. Fitoterapia 2004, 75, 615–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pernet, R. Phytochimie des Burseracees. Lloydia 1972, 35, 280–287. [Google Scholar]
  89. Trenkle, K. Recent studies on fennel (Foeniculum vulgare M.) 2. The volatile oil of the fruit, herbs and roots of fruit-bearing plants. Pharmazie 1972, 27, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Embong, M.B.; Hadziyev, D.; Molnar, S. Essential oils from spices grown in Alberta. Fennel oil (Foeniculum vulgare var. dulce). Can. J. Plant Sci. 1977, 57, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Piccaglia, R.; Marotti, M. Characterization of several aromatic plants grown in northern Italy. Flavour Fragr. J. 1993, 8, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Simándi, B.; Deák, A.; Rónyai, E.; Yanxiang, G.; Veress, T.; Lemberkovics, É.; Then, M.; Sass-Kiss, Á.; Vámos-Falusi, Z. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction and fractionation of fennel oil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1635–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Marotti, M.; Piccaglia, R. The Influence of Distillation Conditions on the Essential Oil Composition of Three Varieties of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Miguel, M.G.; Cruz, C.; Faleiro, L.; Simoes, M.T.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G. Foeniculum vulgare essential oils: Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lawrence, B.M. Progress in Essential Oils: Sweet Fennel Oil and Extract. Available online: https://www.perfumerflavorist.com/fragrance/ingredients/article/21860821/progress-in-essential-oils-sweet-fennel-oil-and-extract (accessed on 7 October 2022).
  96. Mikre, W.; Rohloff, J.; Hymete, A. Volatile constituents and antioxidant activity of essential oils obtained from important aromatic plants of Ethiopia. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2007, 10, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hao, Y.; Kang, J.; Guo, X.; Yang, R.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Shi, L. Comparison of Nutritional Compositions and Essential Oil Profiles of Different Parts of a Dill and Two Fennel Cultivars. Foods 2021, 10, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Basaglia, G.; Fiori, J.; Leoni, A.; Gotti, R. Determination of Estragole in Fennel Herbal Teas by HS-SPME and GC-MS. Anal. Lett. 2014, 47, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Raffo, A.; Nicoli, S.; Leclercq, C. Quantification of estragole in fennel herbal teas: Implications on the assessment of dietary exposure to estragole. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Denzer, M.Y.; Kirsch, F.; Buettner, A. Are odorant constituents of herbal tea transferred into human milk? J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hausner, H.; Bredie, W.L.; Molgaard, C.; Petersen, M.A.; Moller, P. Differential transfer of dietary flavour compounds into human breast milk. Physiol. Behav. 2008, 95, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sarer, E.; Kokdil, G. Constituents of the Essential Oil from Melissa officinalis. Planta Med. 1991, 57, 89–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mulkens, A.; Kapetanidis, I. Eugenylglucoside, a new natural phenylpropanoid heteroside from Melissa officinalis. J. Nat. Prod. 1988, 51, 496–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nykänen, I.; Holm, Y.; Hiltunen, R. Composition of the Essential Oil of Agastache foeniculum. Planta Med. 1989, 55, 314–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nykänen, I.; Nykänen, L. Flavour composition of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) cultivated in Finland. Leb. Wiss. Technol. 1986, 19, 482–485. [Google Scholar]
  106. Do, D.N.; Nguyen, D.P.; Phung, V.-D.; Le, X.-T.; Le, T.M.; Do, V.M.; Minh, B.Q.; Luu, X.C. Fractionating of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil by vacuum fractional distillation. Processes 2021, 9, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Atal, C.K.; Bradu, B.L. Search for aroma chemicals of industrial value from genus Cymbopogon. Part IV. Chandi and Kolar grasses as source of methyl-eugenol. Indian J. Pharm. 1976, 38, 63–64. [Google Scholar]
  108. Guenther, E. The Essential Oils, 4th ed.; D. Van Nostrand Company Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1950; pp. 82–115. [Google Scholar]
  109. Wijesekera, R.O.B. The chemical composition and analysis of citronella oil. J. Natl. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka 1973, 1, 67–81. [Google Scholar]
  110. Wany, A.; Jha, S.; Nigam, V.K.; Pandey, D.M. Chemical analysis and therapeutic uses of citronella oil from Cymbopogon winterianus: A short review. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2013, 1, 504–521. [Google Scholar]
  111. Trang, D.T.; Hoang, T.K.V.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Van Cuong, P.; Dang, N.H.; Dang, H.D.; Nguyen Quang, T.; Dat, N.T. Essential Oils of Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf) Induces Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in A549 Lung Cancer Cells. BioMed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 5924856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Blank, I.; Schieberle, P. Analysis of the seasoning-like flavour substances of a commercial lovage extract (Levisticum officinale Koch.). Flavour Fragr. J. 1993, 8, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Semeniuc, C.A.; Socaciu, M.I.; Socaci, S.A.; Muresan, V.; Fogarasi, M.; Rotar, A.M. Chemometric Comparison and Classification of Some Essential Oils Extracted from Plants Belonging to Apiaceae and Lamiaceae Families Based on Their Chemical Composition and Biological Activities. Molecules 2018, 23, 2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sprea, R.M.; Fernandes, A.; Calhelha, R.C.; Pereira, C.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Alves, M.J.; Canan, C.; Barros, L.; Amaral, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical and bioactive characterization of the aromatic plant Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch: A comprehensive study. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Du, S.S.; Yang, K.; Wang, C.F.; You, C.X.; Geng, Z.F.; Guo, S.S.; Deng, Z.W.; Liu, Z.L. Chemical constituents and activities of the essential oil from Myristica fragrans against cigarette beetle Lasioderma serricorne. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 1449–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Analytical Methods Committee. Application of gas—Liquid chromatography to the analysis of essential oils. Part XIV. Monographs for five essential oils. Analyst 1988, 113, 1125–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sanford, K.J.; Heinz, D.E. Effects of storage on the volatile composition of nutmeg. Phytochemistry 1971, 10, 1245–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lawrence, B.M. Progress in Essential Oils—Galangal Oil, Celery Leaf and Seed Oils. Perfum. Flavorist 2005, 30, 66–75. [Google Scholar]
  119. Baldry, J.; Dougan, J.; Matthews, W.S.; Nabney, J.; Pickering, G.R.; Robinson, F.V. Composition and Flavour of Nutmeg oils. Int. Flavours Food Addit. 1976, 7, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  120. Reeve, D. Naturals-The Spice Trail: Nutmeg-Origins, cultivation and processing. Perfum. Flavorist 2006, 31, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  121. Ashokkumar, K.; Vellaikumar, S.; Muthusamy, M.; Dhanya, M.K.; Aiswarya, S. Compositional variation in the leaf, mace, kernel, and seed essential oil of nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.) from the Western Ghats, India. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 432–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Archer, A.W. Determination of safrole and myristicin in nutmeg and mace by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1988, 438, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hallstrom, H.; Thuvander, A. Toxicological evaluation of myristicin. Nat. Toxins 1997, 5, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lopez, P.; Van Sisseren, M.; De Marco, S.; Jekel, A.; De Nijs, M.; Mol, H.G. A straightforward method to determine flavouring substances in food by GC-MS. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Al-Malahmeh, A.J.; Alajlouni, A.M.; Ning, J.; Wesseling, S.; Vervoort, J.; Rietjens, I.M.C.M. Determination and risk assessment of naturally occurring genotoxic and carcinogenic alkenylbenzenes in nutmeg-based plant food supplements. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017, 37, 1254–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Dawidowicz, A.L.; Dybowski, M.P. Simple and rapid determination of myristicin in human serum. Forensic Toxicol. 2013, 31, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ávila, M.; Zougagh, M.; Escarpa, A.; Rios, A. Determination of alkenylbenzenes and related flavour compounds in food samples by on-column preconcentration-capillary liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 7179–7185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Forrest, T.P.; Forrest, J.E.; Heacock, R.A. The isolation of some diarylpropanoids from nutmeg. Naturwissenschaften 1973, 60, 257–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Forrest, J.E.; Heacock, R.A.; Forrest, T.P. The isolation of dehydrodiisoeugenol from the aril of Myristica fragrans HOUTT. Experientia 1973, 29, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Forrest, J.E.; Heacock, R.A.; Forrest, T.P. Diarylpropanoids from nutmeg and mace (Myristica fragrans Houtt.). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1974, 2, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Harvey, D.J. Examination of the diphenylpropanoids of nutmeg as their trimethylsilyl, triethylsilyl and tri-n-propylsilyl derivatives using combined gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1975, 110, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Abourashed, E.A.; El-Alfy, A.T. Chemical diversity and pharmacological significance of the secondary metabolites of nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.). Phytochem. Rev. 2016, 15, 1035–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chiu, S.; Wang, T.; Belski, M.; Abourashed, E.A. HPLC-guided isolation, purification and characterization of phenylpropanoid and phenolic constituents of nutmeg kernel (Myristica fragrans). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ha, M.T.; Vu, N.K.; Tran, T.H.; Kim, J.A.; Woo, M.H.; Min, B.S. Phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Myristica fragrans Houtt.: An updated review. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2020, 43, 1067–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Beyer, J.; Ehlers, D.; Maurer, H.H. Abuse of nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.): Studies on the metabolism and the toxicologic detection of its ingredients elemicin, myristicin, and safrole in rat and human urine using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Ther. Drug Monit. 2006, 28, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Neukamm, M.A.; Schwelm, H.M.; Vieser, S.; Schiesel, N.; Auwarter, V. Detection of nutmeg abuse by gas chromatography—Mass spectrometric screening of urine. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2020, 44, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kasting, R.; Sydow, E.V.; Andersson, J. Volatile constituents in leaves of parsley. Phytochemistry 1972, 11, 2277–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Franz, C.; Glasl, H. Zur Kenntnis der Ätherischen Öle von Petersilie II. Vergleichende Untersuchung des Frucht-, Blatt- und Wurzelöles einiger Petersiliensorten. Qual. Plant. 1976, 25, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shatar, S.; Altantsetseg, S. Essential oil composition of some plants cultivated in Mongolian climate. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Simon, J.E.; Quinn, J. Characterization of essential oil of parsley. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1988, 36, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Macleod, A.J.; Snyder, C.H.; Subramanian, G. Volatile aroma constituents of parsley leaves. Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 2623–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Masanetz, C.; Grosch, W. Key odorants of parsley leaves (Petroselinum crispum [Mill.] Nym. ssp. crispum) by Odour–activity values. Flavour Fragr. J. 1998, 13, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sharmeen Jugreet, B.; Kouadio Ibrahime, S.; Zengin, G.; Abdallah, H.H.; Fawzi Mahomoodally, M. GC/MS Profiling, In Vitro and In Silico Pharmacological Screening and Principal Component Analysis of Essential Oils from Three Exotic and Two Endemic Plants from Mauritius. Chem. Biodivers. 2021, 18, e2000921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Alajlouni, A.M.; Al-Malahmeh, A.J.; Isnaeni, F.N.; Wesseling, S.; Vervoort, J.; Rietjens, I.M.C.M. Level of Alkenylbenzenes in Parsley and Dill Based Teas and Associated Risk Assessment Using the Margin of Exposure Approach. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 8640–8646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Alajlouni, A.M.; Al-Malahmeh, A.J.; Wesseling, S.; Kalli, M.; Vervoort, J.; Rietjens, I.M.C.M. Risk assessment of combined exposure to alkenylbenzenes through consumption of plant food supplements containing parsley and dill. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2017, 34, 2201–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Salehi, B.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Gyawali, R.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Rajkovic, J.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Khan, T.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Ozleyen, A.; Turkdonmez, E.; et al. Piper Species: A Comprehensive Review on Their Phytochemistry, Biological Activities and Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Dosoky, N.S.; Satyal, P.; Barata, L.M.; Da Silva, J.K.R.; Setzer, W.N. Volatiles of Black Pepper Fruits (Piper nigrum L.). Molecules 2019, 24, 4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Rivera-Pérez, A.; López-Ruiz, R.; Romero-González, R.; Garrido Frenich, A. A new strategy based on gas chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (GC–HRMS-Q-Orbitrap) for the determination of alkenylbenzenes in pepper and its varieties. Food Chem. 2020, 321, 126727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Russell, G.F.; Jennings, W.G. Constituents of black pepper. Oxygenated compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1969, 17, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Richard, H.M.; Jennings, W.G. Volatile composition of black pepper. J. Food Sci. 1971, 36, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. U.S. National Toxicology Program. NTP Technical Report on the Toxicity Studies of Myristicin (CASRN 607-91-0) Administered by Gavage to F344/NTac Rats and B6C3F1/N Mice. Natl. Toxicol. Program Tech. Rep. Ser. 2019, 95, 1–65. [Google Scholar]
  152. Jirovetz, L.; Buchbauer, G.; Ngassoum, M.B.; Geissler, M. Aroma compound analysis of Piper nigrum and Piper guineense essential oils from Cameroon using solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography, solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and olfactometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 976, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ekundayo, O.; Laakso, I.; Hiltunen, R.; Adegbola, R.M.; Oguntimein, B.; Sofowora, A. Essential oil constituents of ashanti pepper (piper guineense) fruits (Berries). J. Agr. Food Chem. 1988, 36, 880–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Da Silva, J.K.; Da Trindade, R.; Alves, N.S.; Figueiredo, P.L.; Maia, J.G.S.; Setzer, W.N. Essential oils from neotropical Piper species and their biological activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Xiang, C.P.; Han, J.X.; Li, X.C.; Li, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Qu, Y.; Hao, C.Y.; Li, H.Z.; Yang, C.R.; et al. Chemical Composition and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity of Essential Oils from Piper Species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3702–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Barbosa, Q.P.S.; Da Câmara, C.A.G.; Ramos, C.S.; Nascimento, D.C.O.; Lima-Filho, J.V.; Guimarães, E.F. Chemical composition, circadian rhythm and antibacterial activity of essential oils of piper divaricatum: A new source of safrole. Quim. Nova 2012, 35, 1806–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Van Genderen, M.H.P.; Leclercq, P.A.; Delgado, H.S.; Kanjilal, P.B.; Singh, R.S. Compositional analysis of the leaf oils of Piper callosum Ruiz & Pav. from Peru and Michelia montana Blume from India. Spectroscopy 1999, 14, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Masuda, T.; Inazumi, A.; Yamada, Y.; Padolina, W.G.; Kikuzaki, H.; Nakatani, N. Antimicrobial phenylpropanoids from Piper sarmentosum. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3227–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kumamoto, J.; Scora, R.W. Structure of sarisan, an isomer of myristicin, isolated from the leaf oil of Beilschmiedia miersii. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2002, 18, 544–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. De Lima Moreira, D.; Kaplan, M.A.C.; Guimarães, E.F. Essential Oil Analysis of Two Piper Species (Piperaceae). Anais Acad. Bras. Cienc. 1998, 70, 751–754. [Google Scholar]
  161. Bizzo, H.R.; Lopes, D.; Abdala, R.V.; Pimentel, F.A.; De Souza, J.A.; Pereira, M.V.G.; Bergter, L.; Guimarães, E.F. Sarisan from leaves of Piper affinis hispidinervum C. DC (long pepper). Flavour Fragr. J. 2001, 16, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Vila, R.; Tomi, F.; Mundina, M.; Santana, A.I.; Solís, P.N.; López Arce, J.B.; Balderrama Iclina, J.L.; Iglesias, J.; Gupta, M.P.; Casanova, J.; et al. Unusual composition of the essential oils from the leaves of Piper aduncum. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Atal, C.K.; Dhar, K.L.; Singh, J. The chemistry of Indian Piper species. Lloydia 1975, 38, 256–264. [Google Scholar]
  164. Brophy, J.J.; Goldsack, R.J.; Punruckvong, A.; Forster, P.I.; Fookes, C.J.R. Essential Oils of the GenusCrowea(Rutaceae). J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997, 9, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. De Lira, P.N.B.; Da Silva, J.K.R.; Andrade, E.H.A.; Sousa, P.J.C.; Silva, N.N.S.; Maia, J.G.S. Essential oil composition of three Peperomia species from the Amazon, Brazil. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Bessiere, J.M.; Menut, C.; Lamaty, G.; Joseph, H. Variations in the volatile constituents of peperomia rotundifolia schlecht. & cham. grown on different host-trees in guadeloupe. Flavour Fragr. J. 1994, 9, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. De Diaz, A.M.P.; Diaz, P.P.; Cardoso, H. Volatile constituents of Peperomia subespatulata. Planta Med. 1988, 54, 92–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Andrade, E.H.A.; Carreira, L.M.M.; Da Silva, M.H.L.; Da Silva, J.D.; Bastos, C.N.; Sousa, P.J.C.; Guimarães, E.F.; Maia, J.G.S. Variability in essential-oil composition of Piper marginatum sensu lato. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Maia, J.G.S.; Zohhbi, M.D.B.; Andrade, E.H.A.; Santos, A.S.; Da Silva, M.H.L.; Luz, A.I.R.; Bastos, C.N. Constituents of the essential oil of Piper aduncum L. growing wild in the Amazon region. Flavour Fragr. J. 1998, 13, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Rivera, P.N.; Mosquera, T.; Baldisserotto, A.; Abad, J.; Aillon, C.; Cabezas, D.; Piedra, J.; Coronel, I.; Manfredini, S. Chemical composition and in-vitro biological activities of the essential oil from leaves of Peperomia inaequalifolia Ruiz & Pav. Am. J. Essent. Oils Nat. Prod. 2015, 2, 29–31. [Google Scholar]
  171. Verma, R.S.; Padalia, R.C.; Goswami, P.; Chauhan, A. Essential oil composition of Peperomia pellucida (L.) Kunth from India. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2015, 27, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Mesquita, K.d.S.M.; Feitosa, B.d.S.; Cruz, J.N.; Ferreira, O.O.; Franco, C.d.J.P.; Cascaes, M.M.; Oliveira, M.S.d.; Andrade, E.H.d.A. Chemical Composition and Preliminary Toxicity Evaluation of the Essential Oil from Peperomia circinnata Link var. circinnata. (Piperaceae) in Artemia salina Leach. Molecules 2021, 26, 7359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Van Asselt, E.D.; Banach, J.L.; Van Der Fels-Klerx, H.J. Prioritization of chemical hazards in spices and herbs for European monitoring programs. Food Control 2018, 83, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Thieme, H. On a method for spectrophotometric determination of methylchavicol in estragon oils. Die Pharm. 1968, 23, 339–340. [Google Scholar]
  175. Tateo, F.; Santamaria, L.; Bianchi, L.; Bianchi, A. Basil oil and tarragon oil: Composition and genotoxicity evaluation. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1989, 1, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. De Vincenzi, M.; Silano, M.; Maialetti, F.; Scazzocchio, B. Constituents of aromatic plants: II. Estragole. Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Vostrowsky, O.; Michaelis, K.; Ihm, H.; Zintl, R.; Knobloch, K. On the essential oil components from tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.). Z. Der Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1981, 173, 365–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Lawrence, B.M. Progress in essential oils/Progrès dans le domaine des huiles essentielles. Perfum. Flavorist 1988, 13, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  179. Burdock, G.A.; Carabin, I.G. Safety assessment of Ylang-Ylang (Cananga spp.) as a food ingredient. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Tan, L.T.; Lee, L.H.; Yin, W.F.; Chan, C.K.; Abdul Kadir, H.; Chan, K.G.; Goh, B.H. Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, and Bioactivities of Cananga odorata (Ylang-Ylang). Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 896314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Stashenko, E.; Martinez, J.R.; MacKu, C.; Shibamoto, T. HRGC and GC–MS analysis of essential oil from colombian ylang-ylang (Cananga odorata Hook fil. et Thomson, forma genuina). J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1993, 16, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Stashenko, E.E.; Prada, N.Q.; Martínez, J.R. HRGC/FID/NPD and HRGGC/MSD study of Colombian ylang-ylang (Cananga odorata) oils obtained by different extraction techniques. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1996, 19, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Qin, X.W.; Hao, C.Y.; He, S.Z.; Wu, G.; Tan, L.H.; Xu, F.; Hu, R.S. Volatile organic compound emissions from different stages of Cananga odorata flower development. Molecules 2014, 19, 8965–8980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Stashenko, E.E.; Torres, W.; Morales, J.R.M. A study of the compositional variation of the essential oil of ylang-ylang (Cananga odorata Hook Fil. et Thomson, formagenuina) during flower development. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1995, 18, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Brokl, M.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Benini, C.; Lognay, G.; Du Jardin, P.; Focant, J.F. Improvement of ylang-ylang essential oil characterization by GCxGC-TOFMS. Molecules 2013, 18, 1783–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Katague, D.B.; Kirch, E.R. Analysis of the volatile components of ylang-ylang oil by gas chromatography. J. Pharm. Sci. 1963, 52, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Gaydou, E.M.; Randriamiharisoa, R.; Bianchini, J.P. Composition of the essential oil of ylang-ylang (Cananga odorata Hook Fil. et Thomson forma genuina) from Madagascar. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1986, 34, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Surburg, H.; Panten, J. Common Fragrance and Flavor Materials: Preparation, Properties and Uses—5th Completely Revised and Enlarged Edition; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Dima, C.; Dima, S. Essential oils in foods: Extraction, stabilization, and toxicity. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 5, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Fornari, T.; Vicente, G.; Vazquez, E.; Garcia-Risco, M.R.; Reglero, G. Isolation of essential oil from different plants and herbs by supercritical fluid extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1250, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Roohinejad, S.; Koubaa, M.; Barba, F.J.; Leong, S.Y.; Khelfa, A.; Greiner, R.; Chemat, F. Extraction Methods of Essential Oils From Herbs and Spices. In Essential Oils in Food Processing; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2017; pp. 21–55. [Google Scholar]
  192. Botanischer Sondergarten Wandsbek. Petersilie—Giftpflanze des Jahres 2023. Available online: https://www.hamburg.de/wandsbek/gdj-2023-petersilie/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  193. Dawidowicz, A.L.; Dybowski, M.P. Determination of myristicin in commonly spices applying SPE/GC. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 2362–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Tsai, C.-J.; Li, J.-H.; Feng, C.-H. Dual dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for determination of phenylpropenes in oils by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1410, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Cao, X.; Xie, Q.; Zhang, S.; Xu, H.; Su, J.; Zhang, J.; Deng, C.; Song, G. Fabrication of functionalized magnetic microspheres based on monodispersed polystyrene for quantitation of allyl-benzodioxoles coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1607, 460402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Dang, H.N.P.; Quirino, J.P. Analytical separation of carcinogenic and genotoxic alkenylbenzenes in foods and related products (2010–2020). Toxins 2021, 13, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Dang, H.N.P.; Quirino, J.P. High performance liquid chromatography versus stacking-micellar electrokinetic chromatography for the determination of potentially toxic alkenylbenzenes in food flavouring ingredients. Molecules 2022, 27, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Deutsches Institut für Normung. Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln—Bestimmung von Estragol im Teeaufguss mittels GC/MS: Untersuchungsparameter: Estragol, Isosafrol, Methyleugenol, Safrol, alpha-Thujon, ß-Asaron; Verfahrensprinzipien: GC/MS. Technol. Regel 2004, BVL L 47.08-2. [Google Scholar]
  199. Deutsches Institut für Normung. Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln—Bestimmung von Estragol in Aufgüssen aus Fenchel und anderen teeähnlichen Erzeugnissen—GC-MS-Verfahren, Ausgabe 2006-09. Technol. Regel 2006, BVL L 47.08-3. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Examples of structural formulas of alkenylbenzenes found in extracts and EOs mainly from various parts of herbs, spices, and some parts of vegetable plants (For a more detailed overview, see [1]).
Table 1. Examples of structural formulas of alkenylbenzenes found in extracts and EOs mainly from various parts of herbs, spices, and some parts of vegetable plants (For a more detailed overview, see [1]).
trans-Anethole
Plants 12 02075 i001
Anise, seeds (Pimpinella anisum);
Cicely, leaf oils (Sweet chervil; Myrrhis odorata);
Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare);
Tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus)
Apiol from Dill
Plants 12 02075 i002
Dill (e.g., Anethum graveolens and Anethum sowa);
Pepper, some variants (Piper spp.)
trans-Iso-Dill–Apiol
Plants 12 02075 i003
Dill (Anethum graveolens and Anethum sowa);
Sea Fennel or Rock Samphire (Crithmum maritimum)
Apiol from Parsley
Plants 12 02075 i004
Parsley (Petroselinum spp.)
trans-alpha-Asarone
(prohibited in the U.S.A.)
Plants 12 02075 i005
Flag, sweet (Acorus calamus)
cis-beta-Asarone
(prohibited in the U.S.A.)
(restricted §)
Plants 12 02075 i006
Flag, sweet (Acorus calamus)
gamma-Asarone
(prohibited in the U.S.A.)
Plants 12 02075 i007
Flag, sweet, (Acorus calamus)
Carpacin
Plants 12 02075 i008
Carpano Tree, stem bark (Cinnamomum spp.);
Waxflower, leaves (Crowea exalata)
Chavicol (4-Allylphenol)
Plants 12 02075 i009
Betel, leaves (Piper betle);
Bay, leaves (Pimenta racemosa)
Croweacin
Plants 12 02075 i010
Waxflower, leaves (Crowea exalata);
Wild ginger, leaves (Asarum hypogynum and A. costatum);
Willow-leaved crowea, leaves (Crowea saligna)
Iso-Croweacin
Plants 12 02075 i011
Waxflower, leaves (Crowea exalata)
Elemicin
Plants 12 02075 i012
Carrot, wild, seeds (Daucus carota spp.);
Elemi, oils (Canarium commune and C. luzonicum and C. spp.);
Nutmeg, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans);
Parsley seeds (Petroselinum spp.)
trans-Iso-Elemicin
Plants 12 02075 i013
Nutmeg, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans)
6-Methoxy-Elemicin
Plants 12 02075 i014
Parsley (Petroselinum spp.)
Estragole (Methylchavicol)
(restricted §)
Plants 12 02075 i015
Anise, seeds (Pimpinella anisum);
Basil, all parts (Ocimum basilicum spp.);
Chervil (Anthriscus cerefolium);
Fennel, seeds (Foeniculum vulgare);
Tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus)
Eugenol
Plants 12 02075 i016
Basil, leaves (Ocimum spp.);
Bay sweet, leaves (Laurus nobilis);
Cloves (Syzygium aromaticum);
Cinnamon, leaves (Cinnamomum spp.);
Sweet bay, leaves (Laurus nobilis);
Piment, berries and leaves (Pimenta dioica, Pimenta racemosa);
Chervil, aerial parts (Anthriscus cerefolium);
Cherries, sweet and sour, as well as many other fruits
meta-Eugenol (Chavibetol)
Plants 12 02075 i017
Pimenta pseudocaryophyllus, leaves (Brasil);
Betel, leaves (Piper betle)
ortho-Eugenol
Plants 12 02075 i018
Dill (Anethum graveolens and Anethum sowa)
Acetyleugenol
Plants 12 02075 i019
Basil, some variants (Ocimum basilicum spp.);
Bay sweet, leaves (Laurus nobilis);
Clove, flower buds and leaves (Syzygium aromaticum)
trans-Iso-Eugenol
Plants 12 02075 i020
Ylang-ylang, tree flowers (Canangium odoratum genuine)
trans-pseudo-Iso-Eugenyl-2-methylbutyrate
Plants 12 02075 i021
Anise, seeds (Pimpinella anisum)
6-Methoxyeugenol
Plants 12 02075 i022
Nutmeg, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans)
Exalatacin
Plants 12 02075 i023
Waxflower, leaves (Crowea exalata)
Methyleugenol
(restricted §)
Plants 12 02075 i024
Basil, all parts (Ocimum spp.);
Bay sweet, leaves (Laurus nobilis);
Carrot seed, oils (Daucus carota spp.);
Cinnamon, all parts (Cinnamomum spp.);
Citronella, oils (Cymbopogon winterianus);
Cloves, flower buds (Syzygium aromaticum);
Nutmeg, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans);
Ysop (Hyssopus officinalis)
trans-Iso-Methyleugenol
Plants 12 02075 i025
Carrot, seeds of some variants (Daucus carota spp.);
Citronella, oils (Cymbopogon winterianus)
Myristicin
Plants 12 02075 i026
Anise, seeds (Pimpinella anisum);
Carrot, seeds and roots of some variants (Daucus carota);
Dill, oils (Anethum graveolens and Anethum sowa);
Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare);
Nutmeg, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans);
Parsley, leaves and seeds (Petroselinum spp.);
Parsnip, roots (Pastinaca sativa)
trans-Iso-Myristicin
Plants 12 02075 i027
Nutmeg, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans);
Parsley (Petroselinum sativum);
Dill (Anethum graveolens and Anethum sowa)
trans-Nothosmyrnol
Plants 12 02075 i028
Chervil (Anthriscus cerefolium)
Osmorhizole
Plants 12 02075 i029
Chervil (Anthriscus cerefolium)
Safrole
(prohibited in the U.S.A.)
(restricted §)
Plants 12 02075 i030
Anise, seed (Pimpinella anisum);
Camphor tree; wood branches and leaves (Camphora officinarum and Cinnamomum camphora);
Cinmamon, leaves (Cinnamomum zeylanicum and C. cassia)
Fennelwood tree, roots (Sassafras albidum);
Nutmeg, leaves, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans);
Sweetwood, stem bark (Ocotea opifera);
Piper auritum, leaves;
Piper divaricatum, all parts;
Piper hispidinervum, leaves
trans-Iso-Safrole
(prohibited in the U.S.A.)
Plants 12 02075 i031
Nutmeg, kernel and mace (Myristica fragrans);
Pepper, several parts and variants (Piper spp.);
Ylang-ylang, tree flower (Canangium odoratum genuine)
Sarisan
Plants 12 02075 i032
Alpine Lovage, roots (Ligusticum mutellina);
Ginger, wild, roots (Asarum heterotropoides);
Sweetwood, stem bark (Ocotea opifera);
Pepper, several (Piper spp., e.g., EOs from ripe berries of Piper guineense, from roots of Piper auritum, from leaves of Piper solmsianum, Piper callosum, Piper affinis hispidinervum, and of Beilschmiedia miersii)
§ restricted according to Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 (consolidated version 2022).
Table 2. Herbs, spices, and vegetables that have been identified to contain alkenylbenzenes. Mentioned are those alkenylbenzenes (Ab) assumed to predominate in essential oils.
Table 2. Herbs, spices, and vegetables that have been identified to contain alkenylbenzenes. Mentioned are those alkenylbenzenes (Ab) assumed to predominate in essential oils.
Common NameSpeciesFamilyAb 1 in EO Ab 2 in EO
AllspicePimenta dioicaMyrtaceaeMethyleugenol
0.1–82%
in EO from berries
Eugenol
8–95%
in EO from berries
AnisePimpinella anisumApiaceaetrans-Anethole
80–90% in EO from dried ripe fruits
Estragole
1–8% in EO from dried ripe fruits
Chinese Star AniseIllicium verumIlliciaceaetrans-Anethole
88–92% in EO from dried ripe fruits
Estragole
0.5–5.5% in EO from dried ripe fruits
Japanese Star AniseIllicium anisatumIlliciaceaeMethyleugenol
9.8% in EO from dried ripe fruits
Safrole
6.6% in EO from dried ripe fruits
Basil, sweet Ocimum basilicumLamiaceaeMethyleugenol
9–87% in EO of all aerial parts
Estragole
0–58% in EO of all aerial parts
BayPimenta racemosaMyrtaceaeEugenol
0–66% in EO from leaves
Methyleugenol
0–64% in EO from leaves
Bay, sweetLaurus nobilisLauraceaeMethyleugenol
up to 21% in EO from wild leaves
Elemicin
up to 5% in EO
from wild leaves
CarrotDaucus carota sativaApiaceaeMyristicin in EO from carrot roots
(40 ppm)
Myristicin in EO from carrot roots
(0.5–15 ppm)
Carrot, wildDaucus carota sahariensisApiaceaeMyristicin
44% in EO from carrot roots
Myristicin
34% in EO from carrot leaves
ChervilAnthriscus cerefoliumApiaceaeEstragole
75–80% in EO from aerial parts
1-Allyl-2,4-dimethoxybenzene
unknown quantity
CinnamonCinnamomum ceylanicum, and
C. cassia
LauraceaeEugenol
up to 87% in EO from leaves
Safrole (traces) in EO from bark
CloveSyzygium aromaticumMyrtaceaeEugenol
up to 89% in EO from air-dried buds
Acetyleugenol
up to 7% in EO from air-dried buds
DillAnethum graveolensApiaceaeDill–Apiol up to 25% in EO from dill seeds and also from roots (up to 67%)Myristicin
0.2% in EO from seeds and 4.4% in EO from roots
DillAnethum sowaApiaceaeDill–Apiol
12–15% in EO from dill seeds
Myristicin
0.2% in EO from dill seeds
ElemiCanarium communeBurseraceaeElemicin
in oleoresins from distillations of resinous exudations from trees
Not yet defined
FennelFoeniculum vulgare var. dulceApiaceaetrans-Anethole
60–90% or up to 88% estragole in EO from seeds and other aerial parts
Dill–apiol
up to 94% in EO from fennel roots
Lemon BalmMelissa officinalisLamiaceaeEstragole 6,3% in EO from leavesEugenol 3.5–4.5% Eugenylglucoside in EO from dried leaves or flowers
Cylon Lemon GrassCymbopogon nardusPoaceaeIso-Methyleugenol
7.2% in EO from leaves
Methyleugenol
1.7% in EO from leaves
LovageLevisticum officinaleApiaceaetrans-Anethole 0.3% in EO from aerial partsNot identified
NutmegMyristica fragransMyristicaceaeMyristicin
0.5–12.4% in EO from kernels
Elemicin
0.3–4.6% in EO from kernels
ParsleyPetroselinum sativum, and
P. Crispum
UmbelliferaeMyristicin
20.3–94.1% in EO from seeds
Parsley–apiol
0.6–78.7% in EO from seeds
PepperPiper nigrumPiperaceaeEugenol
10–120 mg/kg in EO from berries
Estragole
2.2–46 mg/kg in EO from berries
PepperPiper guineensePiperaceaeMyristicin
17% in EO from berries
Sarisan
16% in EO from berries
Purple HazeAgastache foeniculumLamiaceaeEstragol
40–93% in EO from aerial parts
Methyleugenol
0.2–44% in EO from aerial parts
TarragonArtemisia dracunculusAsteraceaeEstragole
up to 69% in EO from leaves
Methyleugenol
up to 28% in EO from seeds
Ylang-ylangCanangium odoratum genuineAnnonaceaetrans-Anethole
0.3–0.6% in EO from flowers
Methyleugenol
0.2–1.5% in EO from flowers
(EO) essential oil; (Ab1) Highest amounts of an alkenylbenzene reported in EOs; (Ab2) Second highest amounts of an alkenylbenzene reported in EOs; % values are described and referenced in the main text.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Götz, M.E.; Eisenreich, A.; Frenzel, J.; Sachse, B.; Schäfer, B. Occurrence of Alkenylbenzenes in Plants: Flavours and Possibly Toxic Plant Metabolites. Plants 2023, 12, 2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112075

AMA Style

Götz ME, Eisenreich A, Frenzel J, Sachse B, Schäfer B. Occurrence of Alkenylbenzenes in Plants: Flavours and Possibly Toxic Plant Metabolites. Plants. 2023; 12(11):2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Götz, Mario E., Andreas Eisenreich, Janine Frenzel, Benjamin Sachse, and Bernd Schäfer. 2023. "Occurrence of Alkenylbenzenes in Plants: Flavours and Possibly Toxic Plant Metabolites" Plants 12, no. 11: 2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop