Next Article in Journal
Genetic Characterization by SSR Markers of a Comprehensive Wine Grape Collection Conserved at Rancho de la Merced (Andalusia, Spain)
Next Article in Special Issue
Brassica and Sinapis Seeds in Medieval Archaeological Sites: An Example of Multiproxy Analysis for Their Identification and Ethnobotanical Interpretation
Previous Article in Journal
Secondary Metabolites in Basil, Bio-Insecticide, Inhibition Effect, and In Silico Molecular Docking against Proteolytic Enzymes of the Red Palm Weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crops on the Rocks: Production, Processing, and Storage at the Early Medieval Site of Senhora Do Barrocal (Municipality of Sátão, Central Portugal)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/plants11081089
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Discovering Plum, Watermelon and Grape Cultivars Founded in a Middle Age Site of Sassari (Sardinia, Italy) through a Computer Image Analysis Approach

by
Marco Sarigu
1,
Diego Sabato
2,
Mariano Ucchesu
3,*,
Maria Cecilia Loi
1,
Giovanna Bosi
4,
Oscar Grillo
1,
Salvador Barros Torres
5 and
Gianluigi Bacchetta
1
1
Centro Conservazione Biodiversità (CCB), Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente (DISVA), Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Viale Sant’Ignazio da Laconi, 13, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
2
Departament de Prehistòria i Arqueologia, Facultat de Geografía i Historia, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 28, 46010 Valencia, Spain
3
Institut des Sciences de l’Évolution (ISEM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Université Montpellier, UMR 5554, CEDEX 05, 34095 Montpellier, France
4
Laboratorio di Palinologia e Paleobotanica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi, 287, 41125 Modena, Italy
5
Laboratório de Análise de Sementes, Departamento de Ciências Agronômicas e Florestais, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Av. Francisco Mota, Bairro Costa e Silva, 572, Mossoró 59625-900 , Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(8), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081089
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 6 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 16 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crops and Agriculture in Medieval Age in Europe)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The discovery of several waterlogged plant remains in a Middle Ages context (1330–1360 AD) in Sassari (NS, Sardinia, Italy) enabled the characterisation of archaeological plum fruit stones and watermelon and grape seeds through computer image analysis. Digital seed/endocarp images were acquired by a flatbed scanner and processed and analysed by applying computerised image analysis techniques. The morphometric data were statistically elaborated using stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA), allowing comparisons among archaeological remains, wild populations and autochthonous cultivars. Archaeological samples of plum were compared with 21 autochthonous cultivars of Prunus domestica from Sardinia, while archaeological watermelon seeds were compared with 36 seed lots of Citrullus from Europe, Africa and Asia. Moreover, archaeological grape seeds were compared with 51 autochthonous traditional cultivars of Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera from Sardinia, 16 cultivars from Tuscany, six cultivars from Liguria, and eight cultivars from Catalonia (Spain). Archaeological plum remains showed morphological affinity with five cultivars of Sardinia. Seed features of the archaeological watermelon remains demonstrated affiliation with a proper sweet dessert watermelon, Citrullus lanatus, and similarity with some Sardinian cultivars. Regarding the archaeological remains of grape, morphometric comparisons showed a high similarity with autochthonous cultivars from Catalonia and Liguria. This study provides new information about ancient fruit cultivated and consumed during the Middle Ages in Sardinia.

1. Introduction

In recent years, archaeobotany in Italy has developed remarkably and has been documented by several scientific studies and projects [1,2].
Currently, archaeobotanical research in Sardinia (Italy) is focused on the Neolithic [3], Chalcolithic [4], Bronze Age [5,6,7,8,9,10,11], and Phoenician and Punic periods [12,13,14,15]. Unfortunately, only the archaeobotanical studies of Becca et al. [16] and Bosi and Bandini Mazzanti [17] refer to the Middle Ages in Sardinia, in contrast to many Middle Age sites investigated in the Italian peninsula, which represent good examples of seed/fruit information for this period [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
Generally, plant macroremains are identified by comparing archaeobotanical materials with modern reference collections or by using images of seeds/fruit reported in several atlases [30,31,32,33,34,35].
Over the last two decades, to overcome the manual discrimination system of seeds/fruit, image analysis has received considerable attention in plant research using automated systems that have the potential to replace human visual assessments. This methodology was successfully applied to discriminate wild and cultivated plants [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46] and to identify archaeobotanical remains [6,7,9,15,45,46,47,48,49,50,51].
The exceptional and well-preserved quantity of seeds/fruit stones of plum, watermelon, and grape found in a well of Via Satta in the historical city centre of Sassari (NW Sardinia) represents an excellent opportunity to investigate ancient cultivars present in the Middle Ages in Sardinia.
In the light of the above, the main goals of this study are to compare archaeological seeds/fruit stones with modern cultivars using image analysis techniques and to gain new information about the cultivation and consumption of fruit during the Middle Ages, in Sardinia.

2. Archaeological Background

The development of the city of Sassari, today the second largest city in Sardinia, took place during the 12th and 13th centuries AD, when it became one of the main centres for inland and foreign trade of a wide variety of products. In 1272, the city fell under the control of the Republic of Pisa and later, in 1294, under the Republic of Genoa [52]. In 1323, citizens decided to become part of the Crown of Aragon [53]. This alliance did not last long, since a few years later, between 1330 and 1331, the continuous insurrections of the city led the Aragonese to the expulsion of some local citizens, which were soon replaced by colonists from Catalonia, Aragona, Valencia, and Tarragona [54]. The events that occurred in this historical phase are highly important for the development of the city of Sassari in the Middle Ages.
During the renovation of the Via Satta, in 2007, in the core of the city centre of Sassari, a Middle Ages well was discovered (Figure 1a,b). The Middle Ages structure was originally part of an open area or domestic courtyard, which has been dated back to the period between 1330 and 1360 AD, according to the typology of majolica fragments from Pisa, Savona, and Valencia widely diffused in that period [55]. The well had a diameter of only 90 cm and a depth of 14 m (Figure 1c). The anoxic conditions and the constant presence of water allowed the optimal conservation of the biological remains discovered. The sediment inside the well was rich in waterlogged plant remains, including wood, seeds, and fruits. A total of 880,000 items (about 117 taxa) have been identified previously by Bosi and Bandini Mazzanti [17] and Bertacci [56]. A significant well-preserved amount of plum, watermelon, and grape remains was recovered, and for this reason, it was decided to investigate these important taxa.

3. Results

3.1. Plums Fruit-Stones

To identify the phenotypic characteristics of the archaeological remains identified as Prunus domestica, in the previous study by Bosi and Bandini Mazzanti [17] and Bertacci [56], the 71 archaeological fruit-stones were compared with the 21 modern cultivars present in Sardinia. Based on this comparative analysis, the LDA showed an overall percentage of correct identification of 64.9% (Table 1); the result showed that the archaeological fruit-stones were matched to five modern cultivars, in particular with the cultivar ‘Croccorighedda’ (CRO) with a classification percentage of 35.2% (Table 1). The other fruit-stones were assigned to the cultivars ‘Gialla di Bosa’ (GIB; 16.9%), ‘Cariasina’ (CAR; 12.7%), ‘Sanguigna di Bosa’ (SBO; 9.9%), and ‘Laconi F’ (LA5; 8.5%) (Table 1).

3.2. Watermelon Seeds

In the first analysis, the archaeological watermelon seeds were compared to 1039 seeds of Citrullus colocynthis, 1712 seeds of C. lanatus var. lanatus, and 487 seeds of C. lanatus var. citroides. The overall percentage of correct identification reached 93.8%, and the archaeological seeds, included in the analysis as unknown items, were identified as C. lanatus var. lanatus in 95.7% of the cases (Table 2).
In the first analysis, the archaeological watermelon seeds were compared to 1039 seeds of C. colocynthis, 1712 seeds of C. lanatus var. lanatus, and 487 seeds of Citrullus lanatus var. citroides. The overall percentage of correct identification reached 93.8%, and the archaeological seeds, included in the analysis as unknown items, were identified as C. lanatus var. lanatus in 95.7% of the cases (Table 2).
The archaeological samples identified as C. lanatus var. lanatus were compared with the group of modern specimens of C. lanatus var. lanatus. The discriminant analysis showed a high percentage of allocation on the group of samples from Italy. In particular, the archaeological samples matched with the traditional cultivars from Sardinia, in particular with the cultivar known as ‘Sindria Gialla’ (LnITS3), with an allocation percentage of 22.9% (Table 3). The remaining samples found a morphological affinity with ‘Sindria di Gonnos’ (LnITS4), ‘Sindria di Carloforte’ (LnITS2), and ‘Sindria Bianca’ (LnITS1) (Table 3, Figure 2).
The other archaeological samples showed affinity with cultivars from southern Spain (LnES65), Uzbekistan (LnUZ78), Kyrgyzstan (LnKZ81), Algeria (LaDZ59), and Angola (LnAO53) (Table 3, Figure 2).

3.3. Grape Seeds

Archaeological Vitis vinifera seeds were added to the classifier as an unknown group and compared with 81 modern grape cultivars from Tuscany, Liguria, Catalonia, and Sardinia. In the LDA first analysis, the archaeological materials showed a strong morphological similarity with the Catalonia cultivar groups with a percentage of 56.4% and with the cultivars from Liguria with a percentage of 26.3% (Table 4, Figure 2). The other archaeological grape seeds were assigned to Sardinian (10.2%) and to the Tuscany cultivars (7.0%) (Table 4, Figure 2).
In order to understand which modern grape cultivar showed a close relationship with the archaeological seeds, another analysis was conducted. The archaeological grape seeds attributed to the Catalonia cultivars were compared with the modern cultivars currently present in this region. The results showed a high similarity to ‘Garnacha’, with a percentage of 28%, while the remaining grape seeds were assigned to ‘Sumoll’ (25.5%), ‘Monastrell’ (22.2%), ‘Macabeo’ (15.3%), and ‘Ull de Llebre’ (8.0%) (Table 5, Figure 2). Similarly, the archaeological grape seeds that were assigned to the group of grapes from Liguria were attributed to cultivars ‘Lumassina’ (50.3%), ‘Rossese’ (36.3%), and ‘Bianchetta Genovese’ (8.7%) (Table 5, Figure 2). The archaeological samples assigned to Sardinian cultivars referred in particular to six cultivars never exceeding 10% of correct classification (Table 5, Figure 2). Finally, the archaeological grape seeds assigned to Tuscany were allocated a high percentage to the cultivar ‘Bracciola nera’ (37.6%) (Table 5, Figure 2).

4. Discussion

The image analysis system applied to archaeological seed remains discovered in the well of Via Satta confirmed the presence of different fruit cultivars belonging to Prunus domestica, Citrullus lanatus, and Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera.
The archaeological plum remains showed morphological affinity with five ancient cultivars of P. domestica (Croccorighedda, Gialla di Bosa, Cariasina, Sanguigna di Bosa, and Laconi F), with yellow and violet skin colour, currently cultivated in the territories of Bosa, Laconi, and Nuoro. The results suggest that these cultivars were already cultivated in Sardinia during the Middle Ages. Most of the samples of plum remains from the Medieval well showed a close correlation with Croccorighedda, an ancient cultivar grown in Sardinia two centuries ago and mentioned in the bibliography [57,58]. The characteristics of its fruit are obovate in shape, and the colour of its skin is bright yellow. Another interesting cultivar identified in the Medieval well is Sanguigna di Bosa, a cultivar documented in the Punic period in Sardinia [15], indicating interest in the cultivation of this cultivar for over 1800 years, and it is still grown today by small custodian Sardinian farmers.
Regarding watermelon, morphometric analysis confirmed that the archaeological remains likely belong to the proper sweet dessert watermelon instead of citron melon or wild colocynth. Most Sardinian autochthonous cultivars, together with some Spanish, African, and Central Asian accessions, showed a relationship with the archaeological seeds, indicating a common lineage. The introduction of sweet dessert watermelon in Europe is complex and unclear. Recently, Paris [59] concluded that it was selected in the Mediterranean Basin by no later than the 2nd century AD, while Watson [60] sustained the hypothesis that it was introduced during the Islamic period after being selected and improved in India. In Europe, archaeological records of watermelon have been reported for several Greek and Roman sites [22,61], and two seeds were discovered in Sardinia in Phoenician and Punic contexts [50]; however, it is difficult to determine which typology they belonged to. In fact, according to Paris [59], the citron melon arrived in Mediterranean lands during or prior to the Roman period, and Megaloudi [61] suggested that primitive bitter forms of watermelon might have existed in the pre-Islamic era. In any case, regardless of whether this crop arrived in Europe for the first time prior to the Islamic period, it is likely that it had a limited diffusion before the 13th century AD [61]. Bates and Robinson [62] also evidenced that historical sources of watermelons before the 16th century AD were sparse and that, thereafter, a wide range of watermelon cultivars were decrypted. Molecular analysis of ancient watermelon seeds also confirmed the presence of different cultivars during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance [63,64]. Some watermelon typologies were also selected for the consumption of seeds instead of fruit [65]. Linguistically, the etymology of the word watermelon in Spanish and Catalan, sandía and síndria, respectively, has an Arabic origin, literally meaning “from the region of Sind,” Pakistan, according to Real Academia Española (RAE) [66] and Gran Diccionari de la Llengua Catalana (GDLC) [67]. The Sardinian name of watermelon, sìndria (with local variations of sìndia, srìndia, cindria), only in limited areas called foràstigu and patecca [68], is also related to Spanish and Catalan names. As detailed in the introduction, at the time the city of Sassari was part of the Crown of Aragon, some of the Iberian territories were dominated by Muslims for several centuries [69]. The affinity found among the archaeological remains with Sardinian, Spanish, African, and Central Asian accessions might be linked to the different historical events that took place on the island before and during the Middle Ages.
Regarding archaeological grape seeds, morphometric analysis showed similarities with autochthonous cultivated grapes from Catalonia, in particular with Garnacha, Sumoll, and Monastrell, and from Liguria with Lumassina and Rossese cultivars. The seed image analysis established that archaeological grape seeds belonged to different cultivars, probably used for wine production in Medieval times.
The Garnacha cultivar is present in Sardinia with the name Cannonau, which is a synonym for the Spanish cultivar Garnacha [70]. Cannonau is the most cultivated grape in Sardinia (its oldest mention dates back to 1549), and the origin of this ancient vine is still under study [71]. The presence of Garnacha in the well of Via Satta is probably due to an ancient bond dating back to the period in which Sardinia was a Spanish colony (1479–1714 AD), as during this period, the two areas had intense commercial exchanges [72]. We still do not fully know whether Cannonau was already widespread in Sardinia before Spanish colonisation or whether it was brought to Sardinia by the Spanish under the name Garnacha. According to Labra and De Mattia [70], the hypothesis that the Spanish found some interesting cultivars and imported them home for consumption cannot be discarded; in any case, our analyses seem to confirm their presence in Sardinia, at least since around 1300 AD.
Sumoll is an ancient vine mentioned for the first time in 1797 AD [73] and is currently grown mainly in the Catalan region, while its synonymy Vijariego Negro is grown in the Canary Islands [73]. There is no information about its presence in Sardinia in the past, and at present, there is no vine on the market with this name or its synonymy cultivated on the island. The results also showed the presence of Monastrell, an ancient grape cultivar mentioned in 1381 AD by Francesc Eiximenis in Empordà [73]. Additionally, in this case, no historical documentation of its presence in Sardinia in the past is available. Our analyses also indicated the presence of the Macabeo cultivar among the archaeological samples. Macabeo is a cultivar originating from Vilafranca del Penedès in Catalonia, and its oldest mention dates back to the early 17th century AD by Fray Miquel Agustí [73]. We do not have any historical information about this cultivar’s introduction in Sardinia. In the archaeological samples, two other cultivars of Ligurian grapes, Lumassina and Rossese, also emerged. These two varieties, originally from Liguria, are currently not present in Sardinia, and at the moment, there is not much information on their origin. The most reliable hypothesis is that these two cultivars were imported and cultivated in Sardinia during the government of the city of Sassari by the Republic of Genoa, and over time, their cultivation was lost.
Of all the cultivars analysed, those from Sardinia showed the lowest percentage of correlation with the Medieval grape seeds, while only one cultivar from Tuscany seemed to have a good chance of being present at the time of Pisan domination in Sardinia. It is the Bracciola nera, a grape cultivar mentioned by historical sources for the first time in 1600 AD by Soderini and in 1825 AD by Acerbi, who identifies it in Liguria with the name Braciola in Cinque Terre [73].

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Archaeological Samples

A total of 71 plum fruit stones, 70 watermelon seeds, and 1444 grape pips from the well of Via Satta were analysed for this study by seed image analysis (Figure 3).
The archaeological samples were previously cleaned and identified at the species level at the Laboratorio di Palinologia e Paleobotanica of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and then delivered to Cagliari University for subsequent morphometric analysis to determine the cultivars.

5.2. Modern Plant Materials

Samples of modern plum fruit stones (Prunus domestica L.), referring to 21 autochthonous Sardinian cultivars (Table S1), were collected from the ISPA field catalogue located in Nuraxinieddu (Oristano, Sardinia). In this study, the same modern samples published in Ucchesu et al. [15] used for the characterisation of plum remains found in the Phoenician and Punic sites of Santa Giusta were considered. A total of 1290 modern plum fruit stones were used as comparison materials (Table S1).
For the reference collection of the genus Citrullus Schrad. ex Eckl. & Zeyh., we selected three taxa: the wild colocynth (C. colocynthis (L.) Schrad.), the common sweet dessert watermelon (C. lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai var. lanatus), and the citron or tsamma melon (C. lanatus var. citroides (L.H.Bailey) Mansf.). The modern reference collection included 36 accessions from Europe, Africa, and Asia: 20 cultivars of C. lanatus var. lanatus, five cultivars of C. lanatus var. citroides, and 11 accessions of C. colocynthis (Table S2). Accessions were provided by COMAV Genebank (Centro de la Conservación y Mejora de la Agrodiversidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain), Bari GeneBank IBBR/CNR, the Agriculture Department of the University of Sassari, and the AGRIS Agency (Agenzia per la Ricerca in Agricoltura della Regione Sardegna) (Table S2).
Regarding grape, the modern reference collection was composed of 51 autochthonous traditional cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. subsp. vinifera from Sardinia, 16 cultivars from Tuscany, six cultivars from Liguria, and eight cultivars from Catalonia (Spain) (Table S3). Sardinia grape cultivars were obtained from the AGRIS germplasm field collection at Ussana (Sardinia) (Table S3). Tuscany and Liguria grape cultivars were obtained from the Agricultural Research Council—Viticulture Research Centre (CRA-VIT) of Conegliano Veneto (Italy) (Table S3). A total of 8587 modern grape seeds were used in this study.

5.3. Seed Image and Statistical Analysis

Digital images of archaeological and modern samples were acquired at the Sardinian Germplasm Bank (BG-SAR), using a flatbed scanner (Epson Perfection V550 photo), with a digital resolution of 400 dpi for a scanning area not exceeding 1024 × 1024 pixels [36]. Each accession was scanned twice, first with a white and then a black background. The images were segmented using the software package ImageJ v. 1.53n (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) (accessed on 11 January 2019), and the plugin Particles8, freely downloadable on the official website (http://www.mecourse.com/landinig/software/software.html), (accessed on 1 January 2019) was used to measure 26 morphometric parameters (Table 6).
Regarding the statistical processing, the analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) software version 16.0 [74], applying the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA).
To verify the performance of the LDA a cross-validation procedure was applied considering three statistical variables Tolerance, F-to-enter, and F-to-remove following the procedure described in detail in Sarigu et al. [44].

6. Conclusions

The morphometric study carried out in this work constitutes an innovative contribution to characterising past agrobiodiversity in addition to providing new information about the phenotypic characteristics of fruit cultivated in Sardinia in the Middle Ages.
Morphometric characterisation indicated that the cultivation and use of Prunus domestica were well established in Sardinia during the Middle Ages and that watermelon seeds belong to a proper sweet dessert Citrullus lanatus var lanatus, closely linked to modern Sardinian cultivars. The close connection of these archaeological seeds and the Sardinian cultivars with Spanish, African, and Central Asia typologies was also found, and historical events may also have played an important role in their similarity.
Additionally, new knowledge about the grape history of Sardinia was acquired, enabling us to obtain information about the trade between Sardinia, Spain, and mainland Italy. The history of viticulture in Sardinia is complex, and only morphological and molecular analyses of the various cultivars, together with historical sources, can trace the habits of the people. Sardinia has a long history of grape domestication and may have been a secondary grape domestication centre since the Bronze Age [8]. For these reasons, the results obtained through seed image analysis represent an important step of knowledge on the ancient plum, watermelon and grape cultivars cultivated in Sardinia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11081089/s1, Table S1: General inventory of Prunus domestica. I: Istituto di Scienze delle Produzioni Alimentari (ISPA); Table S2: General inventory of Citrullus. C: Comav Germplasm Bank; BG-SAR: Sardinia Germplasm Bank; S: Sassari University; B: Bari Germplasm Bank; A: Agenzia per la Ricerca in Agricoltura Regione Sardegna (AGRIS); Table S3: General inventory of Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera. A: Agenzia per la Ricerca in Agricoltura Regione Sardegna (AGRIS), CR: CRA-VIT (Agricultural Research Council—Viticulture Research Centre), CI: CIEF (Centro para la Investigación y la Experimentación Forestal).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., D.S., M.U. and G.B. (Gianluigi Bacchetta); methodology, M.S., D.S., M.U., O.G., G.B. (Gianluigi Bacchetta); plant material collection, M.S., D.S., M.U., G.B. (Giovanna Bosi), G.B. (Gianluigi Bacchetta); morpho-colorimetric analysis and statistical analysis, M.S., D.S., M.U., O.G.; validation, M.S., D.S., M.U., O.G., G.B. (Gianluigi Bacchetta); writing—original draft preparation, M.S., D.S., M.U., O.G., G.B. (Giovanna Bosi); writing—review and editing, M.S., D.S., M.U., M.C.L., G.B. (Giovanna Bosi), O.G., S.B.T., G.B. (Gianluigi Bacchetta); visualization, M.S., M.C.L., O.G., G.B. (Giovanna Bosi), S.B.T., G.B. (Gianluigi Bacchetta); supervision, G.B. (Gianluigi Bacchetta). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work of M. Ucchesu has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement (No 101019563–VITALY).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data supporting this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank D. Rovina (Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici per le Province di Sassari e Nuoro) for allowing us the use of archaeological material and the staff of Laboratorio di Palinologia e Paleobotanica of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia for valuable help. We wish to acknowledge M.J. Diez (COMAV Germplasm Bank), who provided most of the watermelon accessions used in this paper, and G. Attene (University of Sassari), who provided most of Sardinian cultivars. We thank L. Baghino and G. Mallica (AGRIS, Agenzia per la Ricerca in Agricoltura della Regione Sardegna), who provided accessions LnITS2 and LnITS4, and we thank the Bari GeneBank for providing the Corsican accessions of watermelon. Regarding grape accessions, we thank F. Meggio of University of Padova and M. Gardiman of CREA (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’analisi dell’Economia Agraria) for accession from Tuscany and Liguria and E. Laguna and P. P. Ferrer of Centro para la Investigación y la Experimentación Forestal (CIEF) for the accessions of the Iberian Peninsula.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mercuri, A.M.; Allevato, E.; Arobba, D.; Mazzanti, M.B.; Bosi, G.; Caramiello, R.; Castiglioni, E.; Carra, M.L.; Celant, A.; Costantini, L.; et al. Pollen and Macroremains from Holocene Archaeological Sites: A Dataset for the Understanding of the Bio-Cultural Diversity of the Italian Landscape. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2015, 218, 250–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mariotti Lippi, M.; Florenzano, A.; Rinaldi, R.; Allevato, E.; Arobba, D.; Bacchetta, G.; Bal, M.C.; Bandini Mazzanti, M.; Benatti, A.; Benes, J.; et al. The Botanical Record of Archaeobotany Italian Network-BRAIN: A cooperative network, database and website. Fl. Medit. 2018, 28, 365–376. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ucchesu, M.; Manunza, M.R.; Sabato, D. Agriculture and Exploitation of Wild Plants at Chalcolithic (4th to 3rd Millennium Cal BC) Sites in Sardinia (Italy). Archaeol. Anthrop. Sci. 2018, 10, 1693–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ucchesu, M.; Sau, S.; Lugliè, C. Crop and Wild Plant Exploitation in Italy during the Neolithic Period: New Data from Su Mulinu Mannu, Middle Neolithic Site of Sardinia. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2017, 14, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bakels, C. Plant Remains from Sardinia, Italy with Notes on Barley and Grape. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2014, 11, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Orrù, M.; Grillo, O.; Lovicu, G.; Venora, G.; Bacchetta, G. Morphological Characterisation of Vitis vinifera L. Seeds by Image Analysis and Comparison with Archaeological Remains. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2013, 22, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ucchesu, M.; Peña-Chocarro, L.; Sabato, D.; Tanda, G. Bronze Age Subsistence in Sardinia, Italy: Cultivated Plants and Wild Resources. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2015, 24, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ucchesu, M.; Orrù, M.; Grillo, O.; Venora, G.; Usai, A.; Serreli, P.F.; Bacchetta, G. Earliest Evidence of a Primitive Cultivar of Vitis vinifera L. during the Bronze Age in Sardinia (Italy). Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2015, 24, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ucchesu, M.; Orrù, M.; Grillo, O.; Venora, G.; Paglietti, G.; Ardu, A.; Bacchetta, G. Predictive Method for Correct Identification of Archaeological Charred Grape Seeds: Support for Advances in Knowledge of Grape Domestication Process. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sabato, D.; Masi, A.; Pepe, C.; Ucchesu, M.; Peña-Chocarro, L.; Usai, A.; Giachi, G.; Capretti, C.; Bacchetta, G. Archaeobotanical Analysis of a Bronze Age Well from Sardinia: A Wealth of Knowledge. Plant. Biosyst. 2015, 149, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sabato, D.; Esteras, C.; Grillo, O.; Peña-Chocarro, L.; Leida, C.; Ucchesu, M.; Usai, A.; Bacchetta, G.; Picó, B. Molecular and Morphological Characterisation of the Oldest Cucumis melo L. Seeds Found in the Western Mediterranean Basin. Archaeol. Anthrop. Sci. 2019, 11, 789–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. van Dommelen, P. Sardinia: Diverging Landscapes. In Rural Landscapes of the Punic World; van Dommelen, P., Gómez Bellard, C., Eds.; Equinox: London, UK, 2008; pp. 115–140. [Google Scholar]
  13. van Dommelen, P. Ceramica Punica Dal Sito Rurale Di Truncu ’e Molas (Terralba, Sardegna). In Proceedings of the l’Africa romana, le ricchezze dell’Africa, risorse, Produzioni, Scambi, Atti del XVII Convegno di Studio, Sevilla, Spain, 14–17 December 2008; pp. 1617–1626. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pérez Jordà, G.; Morales Pérez, J.V.; Marlasca Martín, R.; Gómez Bellard, C.; van Dommelen, P. La Alimentación en una Granja Púnica de Cerdeña. In De la cuina a la taula. IV Reunió d’Economia en el Primer Millenni a.C; Mata Parreño, C., Pérez Jordà, G., Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez, J., Eds.; Universitat de València: Valencia, Spain, 2010; Volume 9, pp. 295–302. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ucchesu, M.; Sarigu, M.; Vais, C.D.; Sanna, I.; d’Hallewin, G.; Grillo, O.; Bacchetta, G. First Finds of Prunus domestica L. in Italy from the Phoenician and Punic Periods (6th–2nd Centuries BC). Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2017, 26, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Becca, G. I Legni del Pozzo. In Sassari. Archeologia Urbana; Rovina, D., Fiori, M., Eds.; Felici: Ghezzano, Italy, 2013; pp. 93–95. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bosi, G. Informazioni Etnobotaniche dai Reperti Carpologici del Pozzo: Risultati di un Saggio Preliminare. In Sassari. Archeologia Urbana; Rovina, D., Fiori, M., Eds.; Felici: Ghezzano, Italy, 2013; pp. 86–92. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bandini Mazzanti, M. Semi e Frutti Dalla Ferrara Basso Medioevale. In Ferrara Prima e Dopo il Castello; Gelichi, S., Ed.; Spazio Libri Editori: Ferrara, Italy, 1992; pp. 118–137. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bandini Mazzanti, M. Il Fossato di Argenta (Ferrara) e la sua Bonifica in Età Medievale: Contributo alla Ricostruzione della Storia del Sito in Base ai Semi e Frutti del Riempimento. In Il Tardo Medioevo ad Argenta: Lo Scavo di via Vinarola-Aleotti. (Quaderni di archeologia dell’Emilia-Romagna 2); Guarnieri, C., Ed.; All’Insegna del Giglio: Firenze, Italy, 1999; pp. 219–237. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bandini Mazzanti, M.; Bosi, G.; Mercuri, A.M.; Accorsi, C.A.; Guarnieri, C. Plant Use in a City in Northern Italy during the Late Mediaeval and Renaissance Periods: Results of the Archaeobotanical Investigation of “The Mirror Pit” (14th–15th Century A.D.) in Ferrara. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2005, 14, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nisbet, R. Agricoltura e Consumo Delle Piante al Castello Della Motta. In L’incastellamento nel Nord-est Italiano (IX-XII Secolo). Stato Della Ricerca e Prospettive D’indagine; Piuzzi, F., Ed.; Quaderni del Museo Archeologico Medioevale di Attimis / 2, Gremese: Udine, Italy, 2000; pp. 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  22. Castelletti, L.; Castiglioni, E.; Rottoli, M. L’agricoltura dell’Italia Settentrionale dal Neolitico al Medioevo. In Le Piante Coltivate e la Loro Storia; Failla, O., Forni, G., Eds.; Franco Angeli: Milano, Italy, 2001; pp. 33–84. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bosi, G. Analisi Dei Microcarboni Nel Sito Di Jure Vetere Sottano Prima e Durante La Vita del Monastero Medievale. In Jure Vetere. Ricerche Archeologiche Nella Prima Fondazione Monastica di Giocchino da Fiore (Indagini 2001–2005); Fonseca, C., Roubis, D., Sogliano, F., Eds.; Rubbettino: Soveria Mannelli, Italy, 2007; pp. 269–272. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mercuri, A.M.; Accorsi, C.A.; Bandini Mazzanti, M.; Bosi, G.; Trevisan Grandi, G. Il paesaggio vegetale di Jure Vetere prima e durante la vita del monastero medievale sulla base dei primi dati pollinici. In Jure Vetere. Ricerche Archeologiche Nella Prima Fondazione Monastica di Giocchino da Fiore (Indagini 2001–2005); Fonseca, C., Roubis, D., Sogliano, F., Eds.; Rubbettino: Soveria Mannelli, Italy, 2007; pp. 249–267. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bosi, G.; Mercuri, A.M.; Guarnieri, C.; Bandini Mazzanti, M. Luxury Food and Ornamental Plants at the 15th Century A.D. Renaissance Court of the Este Family (Ferrara, Northern Italy). Veg. Hist. Archaeob. 2009, 18, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bosi, G.; Mazzanti, M.B.; Florenzano, A.; N’siala, I.M.; Pederzoli, A.; Rinaldi, R.; Torri, P.; Mercuri, A.M. Seeds/Fruits, Pollen and Parasite Remains as Evidence of Site Function: Piazza Garibaldi—Parma (N Italy) in Roman and Mediaeval Times. J. Arch. Sci. 2011, 38, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bosi, G.; Mercuri, A.M.; Bandini Mazzanti, M.; Florenzano, A.; Montecchi, M.C.; Torri, P.; Labate, D.; Rinaldi, R. The Evolution of Roman Urban Environments through the Archaeobotanical Remains in Modena—Northern Italy. J. Arch. Sci. 2015, 53, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mariotti Lippi, M.; Bellini, C.; Mori Secci, M.; Gonnelli, T.; Pallecchi, P. Archaeobotany in Florence (Italy): Landscape and Urban Development from the Late Roman to the Middle Ages. Plant Biosyst. 2013, 149, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Corbineau, R.; Ruas, M.P.; Barbier-Pain, D.; Fornaciari, G.; Dupont, H.; Colleter, R. Plants and aromatics for embalming in Late Middle Ages and Modern Period: A Synthesis of written sources and archaeobotanical data (France, Italy). Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 2018, 27, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Berggren, G. Atlas of Seeds. Part 2. Cyperaceae; Swedish Museum of Natural History: Stockholm, Sweden, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  31. Anderberg, A.L. Atlas of Seeds. Part 4 Resedaceae-Umbelliferae; Swedish Museum of Natural History: Stockholm, Sweden, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacomet, S. Identification of Cereal Remains from Archaeological Sites; IPAS, Basel University: Basel, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bojnanský, V.; Fargašová, A. Atlas of Seeds and Fruits of Central and East-European Flora: The Carpathian Mountains Region; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cappers, R.; Bekker, R.; Jans, J. Digital Seed Atlas of the Netherlands; Barkhuis: Groningen, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sabato, D.; Peña-Chocarro, L. Maris Nostri Novus Atlas: Seeds and Fruits from the Mediterranean Basin; Ediciones Doce Calles: Aranjuez, Spain, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bacchetta, G.; Grillo, O.; Mattana, E.; Venora, G. Morpho-colorimetric Characterization by Image Analysis to Identify Diaspores of Wild Plant Species. Flora 2008, 203, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fawzi, N.M. Macro and micromorphological seed characteristics of some selected species of Caesalpinioideae-Leguminosae. Res. J. Bot. 2011, 6, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grillo, O.; Miceli, C.; Venora, G. Computerised Image Analysis Applied to Inspection of Vetch Seeds for Varietal. Seed Sci. Technol. 2011, 39, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grillo, O.; Draper, D.; Venora, G.; Martínez-Laborde, J.B. Seed Image Analysis and Taxonomy of Diplotaxis DC. (Brassicaceae, Brassiceae). Syst. Biodiv. 2012, 10, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smykalova, I.; Oscar, G.; Marie, B.; Martin, P.; Gianfranco, V. Phenotypic evaluation of flax seeds by image analysis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 47, 232–238. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lo Bianco, M.; Grillo, O.; Cremonini, R.; Sarigu, M.; Venora, G. Characterisation of Italian Bean Landraces (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Using Seed Image Analysis and Texture Descriptors. AJCS 2015, 9, 1022–1034. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sabato, D.; Esteras, C.; Grillo, O.; Picó, B.; Bacchetta, G. Seeds Morpho-colourimetric Analysis as Complementary Method to Molecular Characterization of Melon Diversity. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 192, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sarigu, M.; Grillo, O.; lo Bianco, M.; Ucchesu, M.; d’Hallewin, G.; Loi, M.C.; Venora, G.; Bacchetta, G. Phenotypic Identification of Plum Varieties (Prunus domestica L.) by Endocarps Morpho-colorimetric and Textural Descriptors. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 136, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sarigu, M.; Porceddu, M.; Schmitt, E.; Camarda, I.; Bacchetta, G. Taxonomic Discrimination of the Paeonia mascula Group in the Tyrrhenian Islands by Seed Image Analysis. Syst. Biodivers. 2019, 17, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Farris, E.; Orrù, M.; Ucchesu, M.; Amadori, A.; Porceddu, M.; Bacchetta, G. Morpho-colorimetric Characterization of the Sardinian Endemic Taxa of the Genus Anchusa L. by Seed Image Analysis. Plants 2020, 9, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Giorgi, P.; Giacò, A.; Astuti, G.; Minuto, L.; Varaldo, L.; De Luca, D.; De Rosa, A.; Bacchetta, G.; Sarigu, M.; Peruzzi, L. An Integrated Taxonomic Approach Points towards a Single-Species Hypothesis for Santolina (Asteraceae) in Corsica and Sardinia. Biology 2022, 11, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Terral, J.F.; Tabard, E.; Bouby, L.; Ivorra, S.; Pastor, T.; Figueiral, I.; Picq, S.; Chevance, J.B.; Jung, C.; Fabre, L.; et al. Evolution and History of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) under Domestication: New Morphometric Perspectives to Understand Seed Domestication Syndrome and Reveal Origins of Ancient European Cultivars. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bouby, L.; Figueiral, I.; Bouchette, A.; Rovira, N.; Ivorra, S.; Lacombe, T.; Pastor, T.; Picq, S.; Marinval, P.; Terral, J.F. Bioarchaeological Insights into the Process of Domestication of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) during Roman Times in Southern France. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Pagnoux, C.; Bouby, L.; Ivorra, S.; Petit, C.; Valamoti, S.M.; Pastor, T.; Picq, S.; Terral, J.F. Inferring the Agrobiodiversity of Vitis vinifera L. (Grapevine) in Ancient Greece by Comparative Shape Analysis of Archaeological and Modern Seeds. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2015, 24, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sabato, D.; Peña-Chocarro, L.; Ucchesu, M.; Sarigu, M.; del Vais, C.; Sanna, I.; Bacchetta, G. New Insights about Economic Plants during the 6th–2nd Centuries BC in Sardinia, Italy. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2019, 28, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mureddu, M.; Ucchesu, M.; Sarigu, M.; Del Vais, C.; Piras, F.; Sanna, I.; Bacchetta, G. Studies on Archaeological Olive Fruitstones from the Archaic and Punic Periods (7th–3rd Century BC) of Sardinia, Italy. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rovina, D. Sassari. Archeologia Urbana; Felici Editore: Ghezzano, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  53. Porcu Gaias, M. Sassari: Storia Architettonica e Urbanistica Dalle Origini al’600; Ilisso: Nuoro, Italy, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pala, G. Una nota sul ripopolamento di Sassari al tempo di Alfonso il Benigno. Ann. Facol. Let. Fil. Uni. 1980, 37, 133–161. [Google Scholar]
  55. Biccone, L. Via Sebastiano Satta. In Sassari. Archeologia Urbana; Rovina, D., Fiori, M., Eds.; Felici Editore: Ghezzano, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bertacci, F. Il Contenuto Archeocarpologico del Pozzo di via SATTA a Sassari (XIV Sec. d.C.): Informazioni Etnobotaniche e di Carattere Ambientale. Master’s Thesis, Università di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  57. Moris, G.G. Flora Sardoa; Typ. Regia: Torino, Italy, 1840. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cara, A. Vocabolarietto Botanico Sardo-Italiano; Tip. del Carriere: Cagliari, Italy, 1889. [Google Scholar]
  59. Paris, H.S. Origin and Emergence of the Sweet Dessert Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Watson, A.M. Agricultural Innovation in the Early Islamic World: The Diffusion of Crops and Farming Techniques, 700–1100. In Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization; University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  61. Megaloudi, F. Plants and Diet in Greece from Neolithic to Classical Period: The Archaeobotanical Remains. In British Archaeological Reports International Series; Archaeopress: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  62. Bates, D.M.; Robinson, R.W. Cucumbers, Melons and Watermelons. In Evolution of Crop Plants; Smartt, J., Simmonds, N.W., Eds.; Longman Scientific: Harlow, UK, 1995; pp. 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  63. Gyulai, G.; Waters, L.; Dane, F. Ancient Cucurbit DNA-Unlocking Domestication Events. In Fulbright Grant AY 2005–2006; Fublbright Year Book: Budapest, Hungary, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  64. Gyulai, G.; Szabó, Z.; Wichmann, B.; Bittsánszky, A.; Waters, L., Jr.; Tóth, Z.; Dane, F. Conservation Genetics: Heat Map Analysis of NuSSRs of ADNA of Archaeological Watermelons (Cucurbitaceae, Citrullus lanatus) Compared to Current Varieties. G3 2012, 6, 86–96. [Google Scholar]
  65. Cox, A.; van der Veen, M. Changing Foodways: Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Consumption in Roman and Islamic Quseir al-Qadim, Egypt. Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 2008, 17, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Española, R.A. Diccionario de la Lengua Española; Real Academia Española: Madrid, Spain, 2019; Available online: https://dle.rae.es. (accessed on 5 November 2019).
  67. Fabra, P. Diccionari General de la Llengua Catalana; Edhasa: Barcelona, Spain, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wagner, M.L. Dizionario Etimologico Sardo; Ilisso: Nuoro, Italy, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sanz, V.C. La Valencia Musulmana; Carena Editors: Valencia, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  70. Labra, M. Il DNA Dei Vitigni Sardi. In Il Vino in Sardegna: 3000 Anni di Storia, Cultura, Tradizione e Innovazione; Ilisso: Nuoro, Italy, 2010; pp. 167–180. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lovicu, G. I Vitigni Sardi: Storia e Origine. In Il Vino in Sardegna: 3000 Anni di Storia, Cultura, Tradizione e Innovazione; Ilisso: Nuoro, Italy, 2010; pp. 181–216. [Google Scholar]
  72. Casula, F.C. La Storia Di Sardegna; Carlo Delfino Editore: Sassari, Italy, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  73. Robinson, J.; Harding, J.; Vouillamoz, J. Wine Grapes: A Complete Guide to 1368 Vine Varieties, Including Their Origins and Flavours; Penguin Books: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  74. SPSS. SPSS Base 16.0 Application Guide; Prentice Hall: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Plants 11 01089 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Location of the city of Sassari; (B) The archaeological excavation area of Via Satta (Sassari, NW Sardinia); (C) The Middle Ages well (Biccone 2013, modified).
Figure 1. (A) Location of the city of Sassari; (B) The archaeological excavation area of Via Satta (Sassari, NW Sardinia); (C) The Middle Ages well (Biccone 2013, modified).
Plants 11 01089 g001
Plants 11 01089 g002 550
Figure 2. Selected modern cultivars with a close relationship with the archaeobotanical remains found in the Medieval well of Sassari.
Figure 2. Selected modern cultivars with a close relationship with the archaeobotanical remains found in the Medieval well of Sassari.
Plants 11 01089 g002
Plants 11 01089 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative image of some of the archaeological samples used in this work: (A) Prunus domestica; (B) Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus; (C) Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera.
Figure 3. Representative image of some of the archaeological samples used in this work: (A) Prunus domestica; (B) Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus; (C) Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera.
Plants 11 01089 g003
Table
Table 1. LDA percentage results of comparison among modern Prunus domestica cultivars and Middle Ages fruit-stones considered as unknown.
Table 1. LDA percentage results of comparison among modern Prunus domestica cultivars and Middle Ages fruit-stones considered as unknown.
CodeCultivar NameN° Seeds Cultivar Classification (%)Archaeological Seeds Classification (%)
CADCariadogia9669.8-
CARCariasina3964.112.7
COLColumbu6058.31.4
CORCoru7954.41.4
CROCroccorighedda9875.535.2
BONBonarcado9967.71.4
DORDore2347.81.4
GIBGialla di Bosa9989.916.9
LA2Laconi B.9959.65.6
LA4Laconi E.3083.3-
LA5Laconi F.3073.38.5
LIMLimuninca3063.3-
MELMeloni6083.3-
LARLaconi Rosata2580.01.4
NESNera Sarda6929.01.4
LA3Ollanu de Ou7279.2-
PARParadisu1586.7-
SAESant’Elia2979.3-
SBOSanguigna di Bosa10069.39.9
SIGSighera9972.71.4
SAGSan Giovanni3946.21.4
Overall 64.9%
Table
Table 2. LDA percentage results of comparison among modern seeds of Citrullus colocynthis, C. lanatus var. lanatus, and C. lanatus var. citroides and Middle Ages watermelon seeds considered as unknown.
Table 2. LDA percentage results of comparison among modern seeds of Citrullus colocynthis, C. lanatus var. lanatus, and C. lanatus var. citroides and Middle Ages watermelon seeds considered as unknown.
C. colocynthisC. lanatus var. lanatusC. lanatus var. citroidesTotal
Citrullus colocynthis89.18.02.0100.0
C. lanatus var. lanatus0.7972.0100.0
C. lanatus var. citroides1.86.491.8100.0
Archaeological samples-95.74.3100.0
Overall 93.8%
Table
Table 3. Correct classification percentage between Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus cultivars and Middle Ages seeds considered as unknown.
Table 3. Correct classification percentage between Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus cultivars and Middle Ages seeds considered as unknown.
CODECountryLocalityCultivar NameCultivar
Classification (%)		Archaeological Classification (%)
LnAO22AngolaNamibeUnknown73.1-
LnAO53AngolaLuandaUnknown70.711.4
LnAO55AngolaLuandaUnknown80.91.4
LnDZ25AlgeriaMostaganemUnknown43.5-
LnDZ59AlgeriaAmmes, BécharUnknown64.9-
LnDZ78AlgeriaMostefa Ben BrahimUnknown55.1-
LnES51SpainRota, CádizSandía de Rota86.5-
LnES62SpainMoraleda, GranadaSandía inverniza73.1-
LnES65SpainHuelvaSandía de verano52.77.1
LnES81SpainMallorcaSandía de pinyol blanc78.5-
LnGR32GreeceNavplion, ArgolideKarpusi72.2-
LnITS1ItalyBenetutti, SardiniaSindria bianca 60.04.3
LnITS2ItalyCarloforte, SardiniaSindria 68.011.4
LnITS3ItalySant’Antioco, SardiniaSindria gialla 57.022.9
LnITS4ItalyGonnos, SardiniaSindria 34.015.7
LnITS5ItalyBenetutti, SardiniaSindria niedda 59.0-
LnKZ81KyrgyzstanDzho, Lenin Unknown71.920.0
LnMA3MoroccoUnknownUnknown59.3-
LnSY93SyriaDamascoUnknown73.3-
LnUZ78UzbekistanSalarUnknown48.85.7
Table
Table 4. LDA percentage results of comparison among the Middle Ages grape seeds, considered as unknown and four different modern cultivars groups considering their origin.
Table 4. LDA percentage results of comparison among the Middle Ages grape seeds, considered as unknown and four different modern cultivars groups considering their origin.
TuscanyLiguriaCataloniaSardiniaTotal
Tuscany36.827.115.520.5100.0
Liguria23.635.610.730.1100.0
Catalonia11.811.948.228.2100.0
Sardinia10.012.316.761.0100.0
Archaeological grape seeds7.026.356.410.2100.0
Overall 52.3%
Table
Table 5. Correct classification percentage between Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera cultivars and Middle Ages seeds considered as unknown.
Table 5. Correct classification percentage between Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera cultivars and Middle Ages seeds considered as unknown.
RegionCultivar NameCultivar Classification (%)Middle Ages Seeds
Classification (%)		N° of Archaeological
Seeds Allocation
TuscanyBracciola Nera37.637.6 76
Canaiolo Bianco41.112.9
Canaiolo Nero60.213.9
Livornese Bianca66.110.9
LiguriaBianchetta Genovese62.6 8.7 362
Lumassina85.3 50.3
Rossese62.7 36.3
CataloniaMacabeo72.4 15.3 803
Sumoll65.4 25.5
Garnacha66.3 28.0
Monastrell69.7 22.2
Ull de Llebre57.6 8.0
SardiniaGaloppu47.5 5.4 65
Malvasia di Sardegna41.0 6.1
Nuragus41.3 8.8
Bianca addosa30.3 6.1
Licronaxu rosa44.0 10.8
Gabriella 34.0 6.8
Table
Table 6. List of morphometric features measured on each seed/fruit-stone.
Table 6. List of morphometric features measured on each seed/fruit-stone.
FeaturesDescription
PerimPerimeter, calculated from the centres of the boundary pixels
AreaArea inside the polygon defined by the perimeter
PixelsNumber of pixels forming the endocarp image
MinRRadius of the inscribed circle centred at the middle of the seed
MaxRRadius of the enclosing circle centred at the middle of the seed
FeretLargest axis length
BreadthLargest axis perpendicular to the Feret
CHullConvex hull or convex polygon calculated from pixel centres
CAreaArea of the convex hull polygon
MBCRadiusRadius of the minimal bounding circle
AspRatioAspect ratio = Feret/Breadth
CircCircularity = 4·π·Area/Perimeter2
RoundnessRoundness = 4·Area/(π·Feret2)
ArEquivDArea equivalent diameter = √ ((4/π)·Area)
PerEquivDPerimeter equivalent diameter = Area/π
EquivEllArEquivalent ellipse area = (π·Feret·Breadth)/4
CompactnessCompactness = √ ((4/π)·Area)/Feret
SoliditySolidity = Area/Convex_Area
ConcavityConcavity = Convex_Area-Area
ConvexityConvexity = Convex_hull/Perimeter
ShapeShape = Perimeter2/Area
RFactorRFactor = Convex_Hull /(Feret·π)
ModRatioModification ratio = (2·MinR)/Feret
SphericitySphericity = MinR/MaxR
ArBBoxArea of the bounding box along the feret diameter = Feret·Breadth
RectangRectangularity = Area/ArBBox
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarigu, M.; Sabato, D.; Ucchesu, M.; Loi, M.C.; Bosi, G.; Grillo, O.; Torres, S.B.; Bacchetta, G. Discovering Plum, Watermelon and Grape Cultivars Founded in a Middle Age Site of Sassari (Sardinia, Italy) through a Computer Image Analysis Approach. Plants 2022, 11, 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081089

AMA Style

Sarigu M, Sabato D, Ucchesu M, Loi MC, Bosi G, Grillo O, Torres SB, Bacchetta G. Discovering Plum, Watermelon and Grape Cultivars Founded in a Middle Age Site of Sassari (Sardinia, Italy) through a Computer Image Analysis Approach. Plants. 2022; 11(8):1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarigu, Marco, Diego Sabato, Mariano Ucchesu, Maria Cecilia Loi, Giovanna Bosi, Oscar Grillo, Salvador Barros Torres, and Gianluigi Bacchetta. 2022. "Discovering Plum, Watermelon and Grape Cultivars Founded in a Middle Age Site of Sassari (Sardinia, Italy) through a Computer Image Analysis Approach" Plants 11, no. 8: 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop