Next Article in Journal
Optimization of the Transformation Protocol for Increased Efficiency of Genetic Transformation in Hevea brasiliensis
Next Article in Special Issue
Adventitious Shoot Regeneration from Leaf Explants in Sinningia Hybrida ‘Isa’s Murmur’
Previous Article in Journal
Invasive Stages within Alien Species and Hutchinson’s Duality: An Example Using Invasive Plants of the Family Fabaceae in Central Chile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enduring Effect of Antibiotic Timentin Treatment on Tobacco In Vitro Shoot Growth and Microbiome Diversity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/plants11081066
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

In Vitro Propagation of Humulus lupulus through the Induction of Axillary Bud Development

by
Takeshi Hirakawa
* and
Seia Tanno
Kirin Central Research Institute, Kirin Holdings Company, Ltd., 26-1, Muraoka-Higashi 2, Fujisawa 251-8555, Kanagawa, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(8), 1066; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081066
Submission received: 17 March 2022 / Revised: 11 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 13 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Tissue Culture III)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Humulus lupulus (hop) is a necessary material for beer brewing. Improved breeding cultivars of hops with enhanced tolerance to environmental stresses, such as drought and heat stress, accompanying climate change have been developed. However, a propagation system, which is needed for the proliferation of new cultivars, is not currently available for hops. In this study, we found that treatment of stem explants with 0.01–0.05 ppm gibberellic acid (GA3) induced the development of axillary buds in the hop cultivar Kirin-2, resulting in the proliferation of shoot branching. Additionally, 0.01 ppm benzyl adenine (BA) enhanced the development of axillary buds formed in response to 0.05 ppm GA3 in various hop cultivars, particularly Nugget. The development of axillary buds was strongly repressed by the application of 0.05 ppm BA at a concentration equal to the 0.05 ppm GA3 concentration, which showed the possibility that a high concentration of cytokinin preferentially prevents the effect of GA3 on the development of axillary buds in hops. These results indicated that combined treatment of stem explants with GA3 and cytokinin at appropriate concentrations is effective for the propagation of proliferated hop cultivars through shoot branching.

1. Introduction

Humulus lupulus var. lupulus (hop) is a perennial, dioecious, and climbing plant belonging to the Cannabaceae family. Hop is widely cultivated in areas under a microthermal climate worldwide and is used as a key ingredient in beer brewing because it brings a floral aroma, bitterness, and foam stability [1].
The female flower of the hop called the “hop cone” contains a unique structure and function. In hop cones, the base of bracts surrounded with strig and bracteoles possess glandular trichomes known as lupulin grands, which secrete cells and biosynthesize various kinds of bioactive secondary metabolites, such as prenylated flavonoids (xanthohumol and desmethylxanthohumol), bitter acids (humulone (α-acid) and lupulone (β-acid)) and essential oils [2]. The secondary metabolites derived from the hop cone benefit not only beer brewing but also animal and human diseases. For example, xanthohumol shows multifunctional anticancer activity on various organs of the body [3]. Additionally, iso-α-acids, which are hop-derived bitter acids in beer, suppress amyloid β deposition in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting that iso-α-acids prevent dementia [4,5].
The demand for high-quality hops has increased with the diversification of the brewing industry and preferences for beer. In addition, it is expected that the quality and yield of hops will decrease in the production area due to global warming [6,7,8]. To solve this problem, improved cultivars of hops have been developed using classical intercrosses to increase their quality and yield in warm areas. Because hops are propagated vegetatively, the rapid production or proliferation of new cultivars requires many plantlets but not seeds. The basic methods for the tissue culture of hops are applicable in various cultivars, but there are few reports on the propagation system of hops [9,10]. In propagation systems of some species of plants, the induction of shoot branching based on the development of axillary buds is effective in increasing the numbers of shoot apexes and stem nodes, which are used as materials for plantlets [11,12,13]. In this study, we present a method for inducing the development of axillary buds in hop cultivars Kirin-2, Cascade, and Nugget. We found that the formation of axillary buds in stem explants was promoted by gibberellic acid (GA3). Additionally, the application of cytokinin enhanced the elongation of axillary buds formed with GA3, which indicated that the combination treatment of GA3 and cytokinin is useful for the proliferation of hops through the induction of shoot branching.

2. Results

2.1. Glucose Is Suitable as a Sugar Source in the Axillary Bud Development of Hop

Sugar plays an important role in regulating growth and development in plant tissue culture. In the tissue culture of hops, different types of sugar are used as a sugar source by each hop cultivar [9,10,14]. Thus, we checked the response of hops to glucose, sucrose, and fructose with respect to the axillary bud development of stem explants using the hop cultivar Kirin-2, which is an improved cultivar of hop cv. Shinshu Wase in Japan. The hop cultivar Kirin-2 shows a higher yield and larger amounts of α- and β-acids than the hop cultivar Shinshu Wase. At 3 weeks after incubation, the length of axillary buds of stem explants treated with glucose was 3 times longer than that of stem explants treated with glucose and fructose (glucose: 1.4 cm, sucrose: 0.48 cm, fructose: 0.47 cm) (Figure 1a,b). This result suggested that glucose was most suitable as a sugar for the induction of axillary bud development in the hop cultivar Kirin-2.

2.2. Cytokinin Inhibits the Development of Axillary Buds in Hop

Cytokinin induces axillary bud development in a wide range of plant species [15]. To investigate the effect of cytokinin on the development of axillary buds in hop, we observed sensitivity to benzyl adenine (BA) or trans-zeatin (tZ) in stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2. Under normal conditions, axillary buds developed from stem explants in liquid culture (Figure 2a,b,d,e). In contrast, the application of BA or tZ inhibited the formation of axillary buds in stem explants (Figure 2b,e). The length of shoots in stem explants treated with BA and tZ was 2.5 times shorter than that of stem explants without BA and tZ (Figure 2c,d,f). Additionally, the discolouration of explants was induced by tZ treatment (Figure 2d). These results suggested that cytokinin inhibited the formation of axillary buds and shoot development in hop.

2.3. Induction of Axillary Bud Formation with Gibberellic Acid

In several species of plants, GA3 treatment induces the development of axillary buds [16,17]. Thus, we examined whether the development of axillary buds was induced with GA3 in hop cv. Kirin-2. Under normal conditions, axillary buds were not confirmed at stem nodes near the shoot apex (Figure 3a). However, the formation of axillary buds was observed at stem nodes near the shoot apex in explants treated with GA3. The number of axillary buds in stem explants treated with GA3 was twice as large as that in stem explants without GA3 (Figure 3b). GA3 treatment did not induce internode elongation in the main stem explants, leading to the GA3-induced promotion of axillary bud formation in hops (Figure 3c).

2.4. Combined Treatment with Gibberellic Acid and Cytokinin Strongly Promotes the Development of Axillary Buds

To verify that BA enhances the effect of GA3 on axillary bud development in hop cv. Kirin-2, we observed the development of axillary buds in stem explants treated with both GA3 and BA. The detection frequency of axillary buds in stem explants treated with both GA3 and BA was comparable with that in stem explants treated with only GA3 (Figure 4a,b). In addition, combined treatment with GA3 and BA markedly increased the length of axillary buds by 1.7 times compared with that obtained with the GA3 treatment (Figure 4c). These results suggested that cytokinin enhanced the elongation of axillary buds formed by GA3 treatment in hop.
We then investigated the effect of GA3 and cytokinin on axillary bud development in hop cultivars other than Kirin-2 using Cascade and Nugget, which are mainly cultivated in the US and Germany and show resistance to downy resistance [18,19]. Cascade shows a low amount of α-acid and an aroma with medium strength. Additionally, Nugget is the variety which has high α-acid and mild aroma. The combined treatment with BA and GA3 increased the number of axillary buds in stem explants of Cascade and Nugget by 2 and 2.5 times, respectively, compared with that without BA and GA3 (Figure 5a,b). The length of axillary buds in stem explants of Cascade and Nugget treated with BA and GA3 was 2.7 and 4.3 times, respectively, higher than that of stem explants without BA and GA3 (Figure 5c). In addition, the shoot length in stem explants in Nugget but not in Cascade increased 1.6 times after the GA3 and BA treatments, which indicated that GA3 and cytokinin might have the ability to enhance the development of axillary buds in various hop cultivars, unlike the results obtained for shoot development (Figure 5d).

2.5. Rooting and Transplanting in Hop

Finally, we checked whether the induction of axillary buds was useful in the plantlet propagation of hops. The rooting of stem explants derived from propagated plants through the induction of axillary buds development was observed with 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) treatment (Figure 6a). Additionally, transplanting of stem explants with roots was confirmed in a greenhouse under natural photoperiod conditions, suggesting that our findings might help increase the efficiency of plantlet propagation of hops (Figure 6b,c).

3. Discussion

In this study, our sugar application test first revealed that glucose is most suitable as a sugar source for the induction of axillary bud development in stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 (Figure 1a,b). Different types of sugar were used as a sugar source in tissue culture of each hop cultivar in previous studies. For example, sucrose is used as a sugar source in the hop cultivars Hallertauer Mitterlfrüeh, Columbus, and Chinook [14]. In contrast, glucose is supplemented in the growth medium of the hop cultivars Cascade and H138 [9,10]. Thus, it might be important to select a suitable sugar source for the induction of axillary bud development in each hop cultivar.
We revealed that combined treatment with GA3 and BA induces the development of axillary buds in stem explants of hop. The molecular mechanism underlying the development of axillary buds has been studied for several decades using model plants [20]. In Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana), BRANCHED1/2 (BRC1/2), which belongs to the TCP transcription factor family and is related to TEOSINTE BRACNCHED1 (TB1) in Zea mays and FINE CULM1 (FC1) in Oryza sativa, is a negative regulator of axillary bud development [21,22,23]. The expression of BRC1/2 is activated by increasing the concentration of auxin transported from the shoot apex in the main stem through PIN-FORMED (PIN) auxin-efflux facilitators [21]. In addition, high levels of cytokinin reduced the expression of BRC1/2, resulting in induction of axillary bud development, which suggested that auxin derived from the shoot apex inhibits axillary bud development through the repression of cytokinin biosynthesis at stem nodes. Recent studies showed that the homologue of BRC1/2 also plays an important role in the development of axillary buds in the climbing plant Cucumber sativus [24]. Cucumber BRANCHED1 (CsBRC1) reduces the expression levels of PIN1/3 through direct interaction with their promoter regions, and knockdown mutants of CsBRC1 exhibit overshoot branching [25].
Although cytokinin induces the development of axillary buds in Cannabis sativa, which belongs to the Cannabaceae family, as well as in most species of plants, our phytohormone application test showed that axillary buds developed with GA3 but not BA in hops [26]. GA3 inhibits the outgrowth of axillary buds through regulation of the auxin levels and transport in model plants such as A. thaliana and Populus [27,28]. In contrast, the development of axillary buds is promoted by GA3 in Phaseolus vulgaris, citrus, and snapdragon, as well as in hops, which suggests that the application of GA3 might be useful for the induction of axillary buds in plant species that are insensitive to cytokinin application [12,13]. The combined treatment with BA and GA3 induces the development of axillary buds in stem explants to a greater degree than in plants treated with only GA3 in woody plants, such as Jatropha curcas (J. curcas) [29]. Although BA enhanced the elongation of axillary buds induced with GA3 in stem explants of hops as well as J. curcas, the formation of axillary buds was strongly inhibited by the application of BA at a concentration equal to the GA3 concentration (Figure 4a). These results show the possibility that a high concentration of cytokinin preferentially prevents the effect of GA3 on the induction of axillary buds in hops.
Previous studies have shown that GA3 is involved in the development of hop cones in various cultivars. GA3 application increases the number of hop cones with changes in the α-acid contents in the hop cultivars Saazer, Hüller Anfang, and Hallertauer in the field compared with the variation in the number of hop cones observed with GA3 in the cultivar Fuggle [30,31]. Our phytohormone application tests also showed that the sensitivity to GA3 of shoot development differs between the hop cultivars Cascade and Nugget (Figure 5d). These findings suggest that the molecular mechanisms controlling growth and development involving GA3 are complicated in hop cultivars. Recently, high-quality draft genomes have been constructed through sequencing and de novo assembly in some hop cultivars [32,33]. This information might contribute to revealing the molecular mechanism underlying growth and development in the presence of GA3.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Humulus lupulus cv. Kirin-2, Cascade, and Nugget were used as materials in this study. To obtain the in vitro plants, stem explants were isolated from seedlings and sterilized with 70% (w/v) ethanol and 1% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite for 1 min and 5 min, respectively. After being washed 3 times with sterilized water, the stem explants were transferred to 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) glucose, 0.01 ppm benzyl adenine (BA), and 0.8% (w/v) agar at pH 5.8. The samples were moved into an incubator set at 20 °C with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. After 3 weeks, developed axillary buds with stem explants were transferred to 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 2% glucose and 0.8% agar to establish the in vitro plants in hormone-free conditions. The in vitro plants were subcultured every 1.5 months.

4.2. Sugar Application Test

Stem explants isolated from 1.5-month-old in vitro plants were incubated in 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 0.8% agar and 2% glucose, sucrose, or fructose. At each week for 3 weeks, the length of axillary buds was measured. At least two independent experiments were performed, and similar results were obtained.

4.3. Phytohormone Application Test

Stem explants isolated from 1.5-month-old in vitro plants were incubated in 1/2 MS liquid medium supplemented with 2% glucose, BA, trans-zeatin (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan), and GA3 (FUJIFILM Wako, Japan). After 3 weeks, the shoot length, axillary bud length and number of axillary buds of the explants were measured using ImageJ software. To calculate the relative shoot and axillary bud lengths, the shoot and axillary bud lengths of explants treated with each phytohormone were normalized against the shoot and axillary bud lengths of explants without phytohormones. At least two independent experiments were performed, and similar results were obtained.

4.4. Rooting and Transplanting

Stem explants isolated from 1-month-old propagated plants through the induction of axillary bud development were incubated on papers containing 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 2% glucose and 0.05 ppm NAA (FUJIFILM Wako, Japan) in an incubator at 20 °C. After 2 weeks, stem explants with roots were transferred to the cell trays with soil consisting of Metro-Mix 350 (Sun Gro Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA), vermiculite, and red ball earth (=3:1:1). Plantlets were grown in a greenhouse (25 °C) under natural photoperiod conditions.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test and the Tukey–Kramer test. The sample size and p value are presented in the Figure Legends.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.H.; methodology, T.H.; investigation, T.H. and S.T.; formal analysis, T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Kirin Holdings Company, Ltd.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Shiho Omukai (Kirin Holdings Company, Ltd.) for technical assistance; Tetsu Sugimura, Kanji Mamiya, and Noboru Ohnishi (Kirin Holdings Company, Ltd.) for the discussion related to this study; and Kazuaki Ohara (Kirin Holdings Company, Ltd.) for providing critical comments on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

T.H. and S.T. are employed by Kirin Holdings Company, Ltd. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HopHumulus lupulus var. lupulus
GA3Gibberellic acid
BABenzyl adenine
tZtrans-Zeatin
BRC1/2BRACNHED1/2
TB1TEOSINTE BRACNCHED1
FC1FINE CULM1
PINPIN-FORMED
NAA1-Naphthaleneacetic acid

References

  1. Rossini, F.; Virga, G.; Loreti, P.; Iacuzzi, N.; Ruggeri, R.; Provenzano, M.E. Hops (Humulus lupulus L.) as a Novel Multipurpose Crop for the Mediterranean Region of Europe: Challenges and Opportunities of Their Cultivation. Agriculture 2021, 11, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Almaguer, C.; Schönberger, C.; Gastl, M.; Arendt, E.K.; Becker, T. Humulus lupulus—A Story That Begs to Be Told. A Review. J. Inst. Brew. 2014, 120, 289–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, C.-H.; Sun, T.-L.; Xiang, D.-X.; Wei, S.-S.; Li, W.-Q. Anticancer Activity and Mechanism of Xanthohumol: A Prenylated Flavonoid From Hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Front Pharm. 2018, 9, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ano, Y.; Dohata, A.; Taniguchi, Y.; Hoshi, A.; Uchida, K.; Takashima, A.; Nakayama, H. Iso-α-Acids, Bitter Components of Beer, Prevent Inflammation and Cognitive Decline Induced in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 3720–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ano, Y.; Ohya, R.; Yamazaki, T.; Takahashi, C.; Taniguchi, Y.; Kondo, K.; Takashima, A.; Uchida, K.; Nakayama, H. Hop Bitter Acids Containing a β-Carbonyl Moiety Prevent Inflammation-Induced Cognitive Decline via the Vagus Nerve and Noradrenergic System. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Donner, P.; Pokorný, J.; Ježek, J.; Krofta, K.; Patzak, J.; Pulkrábek, J. Influence of Weather Conditions, Irrigation and Plant Age on Yield and Alpha-Acids Content of Czech Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) Cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 2020, 66, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. MacKinnon, D.; Pavlovič, V.; Čeh, B.; Naglič, B.; Pavlovič, M. The Impact of Weather Conditions on Alpha-Acid Content in Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) Cv. Aurora. Plant Soil Environ. 2020, 66, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Korpelainen, H.; Pietiläinen, M. Hop (Humulus lupulus L.): Traditional and Present Use, and Future Potential. Econ. Bot. 2021, 75, 302–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clapa, D.; Hârța, M. Establishment of an Efficient Micropropagation System for Humulus lupulus L. Cv. Cascade and Confirmation of Genetic Uniformity of the Regenerated Plants through DNA Markers. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roy, A.T.; Leggett, G.; Koutoulis, A. Development of a Shoot Multiplication System for Hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2001, 37, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sugla, T.; Purkayastha, J.; Singh, S.K.; Solleti, S.; Sahoo, L. Micropropagation of Pongamia pinnata through Enhanced Axillary Branching. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2007, 43, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, N.; Wetzstein, H.Y. In Vitro Propagation of Muscadine Grape by Axillary Shoot Proliferation. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1990, 115, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Saxena, S. In Vitro Propagation of the Bamboo (Bambusa tulda Roxb.) through Shoot Proliferation. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 9, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. de-Souza, R.; Adams, C.R.; de-Melo, R.C.; Guidolin, A.F.; Michel, A.; Coimbra, J.L.M. Growth Regulators and Their Reflection on Different Hop Genotypes Cultivated under in Vitro Conditions. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 82, e242596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shimizu-Sato, S.; Tanaka, M.; Mori, H. Auxin-Cytokinin Interactions in the Control of Shoot Branching. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tamas, I.A.; Schlossberg-Jacobs, J.L.; Lim, R.; Friedman, L.B.; Barone, C.C. Effect of Plant Growth Substances on the Growth of Axillary Buds in Cultured Stem Segments of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Growth Regul. 1989, 8, 165–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marth, P.C.; Audia, W.V.; Mitchell, J.W. Effects of Gibberellic Acid on Growth and Development of Plants of Various Genera and Species. Bot. Gaz. 1956, 118, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brooks, S.N.; Horner, C.E.; Likens, S.T.; Zimmermann, C.E. Registration of Cascade Hop1 (Reg. No. 1). Crop Sci. 1972, 12, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Haunold, A.; Likens, S.T.; Nickerson, G.B.; Hampton, R.O. Registration of Nugget Hop. Crop Sci. 1984, 24, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, M.; Le Moigne, M.-A.; Bertheloot, J.; Crespel, L.; Perez-Garcia, M.-D.; Ogé, L.; Demotes-Mainard, S.; Hamama, L.; Davière, J.-M.; Sakr, S. BRANCHED1: A Key Hub of Shoot Branching. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Aguilar-Martínez, J.A.; Poza-Carrión, C.; Cubas, P. Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 Acts as an Integrator of Branching Signals within Axillary Buds. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 458–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Takeda, T.; Suwa, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Kitano, H.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Ashikari, M.; Matsuoka, M.; Ueguchi, C. The OsTB1 Gene Negatively Regulates Lateral Branching in Rice. Plant J. 2003, 33, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Doebley, J.; Stec, A.; Hubbard, L. The Evolution of Apical Dominance in Maize. Nature 1997, 386, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X. Genetic Regulation of Shoot Architecture in Cucumber. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ge, D.; Wang, Z.; Song, W.; Gu, R.; Che, G.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, R.; Zhang, X. CsBRC1 Inhibits Axillary Bud Outgrowth by Directly Repressing the Auxin Efflux Carrier CsPIN3 in Cucumber. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 17105–17114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lata, H.; Chandra, S.; Khan, I.A.; Elsohly, M.A. Propagation through Alginate Encapsulation of Axillary Buds of Cannabis sativa L.—an Important Medicinal Plant. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2009, 15, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Silverstone, A.L.; Mak, P.Y.; Martínez, E.C.; Sun, T.P. The New RGA Locus Encodes a Negative Regulator of Gibberellin Response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 1997, 146, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mauriat, M.; Sandberg, L.G.; Moritz, T. Proper Gibberellin Localization in Vascular Tissue Is Required to Control Auxin-Dependent Leaf Development and Bud Outgrowth in Hybrid Aspen. Plant J. 2011, 67, 805–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ni, J.; Gao, C.; Chen, M.-S.; Pan, B.-Z.; Ye, K.; Xu, Z.-F. Gibberellin Promotes Shoot Branching in the Perennial Woody Plant Jatropha Curcas. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1655–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zattler, F.; Chrometzka, P. The influence of gibberellic acid on the flower and cone development in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Appl. Genet. 1968, 38, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hartley, R.D.; Neve, R.A. The Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Development and Yield of Fuggle Hops. J. Hortic. Sci. 1966, 41, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Natsume, S.; Takagi, H.; Shiraishi, A.; Murata, J.; Toyonaga, H.; Patzak, J.; Takagi, M.; Yaegashi, H.; Uemura, A.; Mitsuoka, C.; et al. The Draft Genome of Hop (Humulus Lupulus), an Essence for Brewing. Plant Cell Physiol 2015, 56, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Padgitt-Cobb, L.K.; Kingan, S.B.; Wells, J.; Elser, J.; Kronmiller, B.; Moore, D.; Concepcion, G.; Peluso, P.; Rank, D.; Jaiswal, P.; et al. A Draft Phased Assembly of the Diploid Cascade Hop (Humulus Lupulus) Genome. Plant Genome 2021, 14, e20072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 11 01066 g001 550
Figure 1. The development of axillary buds of hop requires glucose as a sugar source. (a) Axillary bud development in stem explants of hop cultivar Kirin-2 cells were treated with glucose, sucrose, or fructose for 3 weeks. The white arrowheads indicate elongated axillary buds. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Length of axillary buds in stem explants treated with glucose, sucrose, or fructose each week for 3 weeks (n ≥ 10 individual experiments, ** p < 0.01; Tukey–Kramer test).
Figure 1. The development of axillary buds of hop requires glucose as a sugar source. (a) Axillary bud development in stem explants of hop cultivar Kirin-2 cells were treated with glucose, sucrose, or fructose for 3 weeks. The white arrowheads indicate elongated axillary buds. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Length of axillary buds in stem explants treated with glucose, sucrose, or fructose each week for 3 weeks (n ≥ 10 individual experiments, ** p < 0.01; Tukey–Kramer test).
Plants 11 01066 g001
Plants 11 01066 g002 550
Figure 2. Cytokinin inhibits the development of axillary buds in hop. (a) Axillary bud development in stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 in liquid medium supplemented with benzyl adenine (BA) for 3 weeks. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) The number of axillary buds in stem explants without and with BA for 3 weeks. N.D. indicates no detection (n ≥ 15, individual experiment). (c) Relative shoot length in stem explants treated without and with BA for 3 weeks. The shoot length of explants treated with BA was normalized against the shoot length of explants without BA (n ≥ 10, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences. (d) Axillary bud development in stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 in liquid medium supplemented with trans-zeatin (tZ) for 3 weeks. Scale bar: 1 cm. (e) Number of axillary buds in stem explants without and with tZ for 3 weeks. N.D. indicates no detection (n ≥ 15, individual experiment). (f) Relative shoot length of stem explants without and treated with tZ for 3 weeks. The shoot length of explants treated with tZ was normalized against the shoot length of explants without tZ (n ≥ 10, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 2. Cytokinin inhibits the development of axillary buds in hop. (a) Axillary bud development in stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 in liquid medium supplemented with benzyl adenine (BA) for 3 weeks. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) The number of axillary buds in stem explants without and with BA for 3 weeks. N.D. indicates no detection (n ≥ 15, individual experiment). (c) Relative shoot length in stem explants treated without and with BA for 3 weeks. The shoot length of explants treated with BA was normalized against the shoot length of explants without BA (n ≥ 10, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences. (d) Axillary bud development in stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 in liquid medium supplemented with trans-zeatin (tZ) for 3 weeks. Scale bar: 1 cm. (e) Number of axillary buds in stem explants without and with tZ for 3 weeks. N.D. indicates no detection (n ≥ 15, individual experiment). (f) Relative shoot length of stem explants without and treated with tZ for 3 weeks. The shoot length of explants treated with tZ was normalized against the shoot length of explants without tZ (n ≥ 10, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences.
Plants 11 01066 g002
Plants 11 01066 g003 550
Figure 3. The development of axillary buds was induced by gibberellic acid (GA3) in hop. (a) Stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 treated without and with 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. The white arrowheads indicate the axillary buds. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Number of axillary buds in stem explants without and with GA3 for 3 weeks (n ≥ 15, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences. (c) Relative shoot length of stem explants treated without and with GA3. The shoot length of explants treated with GA3 was normalized against the shoot length of explants without GA3 for 3 weeks (n = 10, individual experiment, no significant difference; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 3. The development of axillary buds was induced by gibberellic acid (GA3) in hop. (a) Stem explants of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 treated without and with 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. The white arrowheads indicate the axillary buds. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Number of axillary buds in stem explants without and with GA3 for 3 weeks (n ≥ 15, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences. (c) Relative shoot length of stem explants treated without and with GA3. The shoot length of explants treated with GA3 was normalized against the shoot length of explants without GA3 for 3 weeks (n = 10, individual experiment, no significant difference; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences.
Plants 11 01066 g003
Plants 11 01066 g004 550
Figure 4. Combination treatment with GA3 and BA strongly induces the development of axillary buds in hop. (a) Stem explants of hop cultivar Kirin-2 cells were treated with GA3 and BA for 3 weeks. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Number of axillary buds in stem explants with GA3 and BA for 3 weeks (n ≥ 14, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences. (c) Relative length of axillary buds of stem explants treated without and with GA3 and BA for 3 weeks. The axillary bud length of explants treated with GA3 and BA was normalized against the axillary bud length of explants without GA3 and BA for 3 weeks (n ≥ 22, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 4. Combination treatment with GA3 and BA strongly induces the development of axillary buds in hop. (a) Stem explants of hop cultivar Kirin-2 cells were treated with GA3 and BA for 3 weeks. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Number of axillary buds in stem explants with GA3 and BA for 3 weeks (n ≥ 14, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences. (c) Relative length of axillary buds of stem explants treated without and with GA3 and BA for 3 weeks. The axillary bud length of explants treated with GA3 and BA was normalized against the axillary bud length of explants without GA3 and BA for 3 weeks (n ≥ 22, individual experiment, p < 0.05; Tukey–Kramer test). Different letters indicate significant differences.
Plants 11 01066 g004
Plants 11 01066 g005 550
Figure 5. The development of axillary buds is enhanced with gibberellic acid (GA3) and BA in various hop cultivars. (a) Stem explants of the hop cultivars Cascade and Nugget were treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. Scale bars: 1 cm. (b) Number of axillary buds in stem explants treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks (n ≥ 9, individual experiment, p < 0.01; Student’s t test). (c) Relative axillary bud length of stem explants treated without and with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. The axillary bud length of explants treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 was normalized against the axillary bud length of explants without BA and GA3 (n ≥ 12, individual experiment, ** p < 0.01; Student’s t test). (d) Relative shoot length of stem explants treated without and with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. The shoot length of explants treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 was normalized against the shoot length of explants without BA and GA3 (n ≥ 10, individual experiment, ** p < 0.01; Student’s t test).
Figure 5. The development of axillary buds is enhanced with gibberellic acid (GA3) and BA in various hop cultivars. (a) Stem explants of the hop cultivars Cascade and Nugget were treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. Scale bars: 1 cm. (b) Number of axillary buds in stem explants treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks (n ≥ 9, individual experiment, p < 0.01; Student’s t test). (c) Relative axillary bud length of stem explants treated without and with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. The axillary bud length of explants treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 was normalized against the axillary bud length of explants without BA and GA3 (n ≥ 12, individual experiment, ** p < 0.01; Student’s t test). (d) Relative shoot length of stem explants treated without and with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 for 3 weeks. The shoot length of explants treated with 0.01 ppm BA and 0.05 ppm GA3 was normalized against the shoot length of explants without BA and GA3 (n ≥ 10, individual experiment, ** p < 0.01; Student’s t test).
Plants 11 01066 g005
Plants 11 01066 g006 550
Figure 6. Rooting and transplanting of hop. (a) Stem explants with roots of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 at 2 weeks after the induction of rooting with 0.05 ppm 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid. The white arrowheads indicate the roots. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Plantlets of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 at 1.5 months after transplanting. (c) Plantlets of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 at 2 months after transplanting.
Figure 6. Rooting and transplanting of hop. (a) Stem explants with roots of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 at 2 weeks after the induction of rooting with 0.05 ppm 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid. The white arrowheads indicate the roots. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b) Plantlets of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 at 1.5 months after transplanting. (c) Plantlets of the hop cultivar Kirin-2 at 2 months after transplanting.
Plants 11 01066 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hirakawa, T.; Tanno, S. In Vitro Propagation of Humulus lupulus through the Induction of Axillary Bud Development. Plants 2022, 11, 1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081066

AMA Style

Hirakawa T, Tanno S. In Vitro Propagation of Humulus lupulus through the Induction of Axillary Bud Development. Plants. 2022; 11(8):1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hirakawa, Takeshi, and Seia Tanno. 2022. "In Vitro Propagation of Humulus lupulus through the Induction of Axillary Bud Development" Plants 11, no. 8: 1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop