Next Article in Journal
Combined Thermomechanical–Biological Treatment for Corn By-Product Valorization into Added-Value Food (Feed) Material
Next Article in Special Issue
Allelopathy and Allelochemicals of Solidago canadensis L. and S. altissima L. for Their Naturalization
Previous Article in Journal
Essential Oils: Useful Tools in Storage-Pest Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Allelochemicals from the Rhizosphere Soil of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and Their Interactions with the Soilborne Pathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modulating Expression Levels of TCP Transcription Factors by Mentha x piperita Volatiles—An Allelopathic Tool to Influence Leaf Growth?

1
Department of Horticultural Production, University of Applied Science, 49090 Osnabrück, Germany
2
Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants (IMBIO), University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(22), 3078; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223078
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 6 November 2022 / Accepted: 9 November 2022 / Published: 14 November 2022

Abstract

:
Peppermint (Mentha x piperita) is a species with inhibitory allelopathic properties due to its high amounts of terpenes. Recent studies have disclosed dosage dependent growth promotion or defense reactions in plants when facing appropriate amounts of Mentha bouquet terpenes. These positive effects could be of interest for agricultural applications. To obtain more insights into leaf growth modulations, the expression of Arabidopsis and Brassica rapa TCP transcription factors were studied after fumigation with M. x piperita bouquets (Arabidopsis), with M. x piperita essential oil or with limonene (Arabidopsis and Chinese cabbage). According to qPCR studies, expression of TCP3, TCP24, and TCP20 were downregulated by all treatments in Arabidopsis, leading to altered leaf growth. Expressions of B. rapa TCPs after fumigation with the essential oil or limonene were less affected. Extensive greenhouse and polytunnel trials with white cabbage and Mentha plants showed that the developmental stage of the leaves, the dosage, and the fumigation time are of crucial importance for changed fresh and dry weights. Although further research is needed, the study may contribute to a more intensive utilization of ecologically friendly and species diversity conservation and positive allelopathic interactions in future agricultural systems.

1. Introduction

Terpenoids, one of the largest groups of plant and microbe secondary metabolites, can positively or negatively impact seed germination and plant growth. Depending on the dosage, many terpenoids have phytotoxic properties [1]. For instance, farnesene, a sesquiterpene, influences cell division, abolishes gravitropism in Arabidopsis, and downregulates auxin polar transport proteins [2]. Monoterpenes are described as interacting with transcriptional activities, cell division, and cytoskeletal elements in fumigated receiver plants, which results in growth inhibition or even plant death [3,4,5,6,7]. Volatile bouquets emitted from aromatic plants, such as Mentha x piperita, affect the transpiration of neighbored Arabidopsis plants by inducing stomatal opening [7]. Therefore, terpenes are considered as lead structures for the design of new herbicides. However, the effects of terpenoids are dosage dependent. Consistently, low dosages can have plant growth promoting properties.
Mentha x piperita L. belongs to the Lamiaceae, a family with numerous species containing high amounts of essential oil with antifungal, bactericidal, insecticidal, and antifeedant properties. More than 50 constituents have been identified in the essential oil fraction [8], which can quantitatively and qualitatively vary from cultivar to cultivar and from leaf to leaf. The composition is determined by genetic factors, depending on culture methods, plant age and organ, microbial interactions, further interkingdom communication, and other biotic and abiotic parameters such as climate, geographical region, altitude, and irradiation. The most abundant compounds in the essential oil fraction and in the bouquets emitted by Mentha x piperita are limonene, linalool, menthone, menthol, and pulegone, while the concentration of single compounds in the emitted bouquets differ from the essential oil fraction of the leaves [9]. Limonene is a precursor of many other monoterpenoids, such as pulegone, menthol, and menthone, and its contents vary over the course of the season [10,11].
In a field study, Sukegawa et al. [9] reported the strong upregulation of Glycine max (soybean) defense genes in the leaves when plants are exposed to Mentha x piperita volatiles. They found a lower damage of Brassica rapa by herbivores when co-cultured with peppermint. We found in a previous study that the volatile bouquet of Mentha x piperita (English Mint cv. Mitcham) positively influenced leaf development in young white cabbage (Brassica oleracea convar. capitata var. alba) plants during a 27-day-fumigation, while the influence on leaf growth seemed to depend on responsiveness during early stages of leaf development. A changed leaf shape but no enhanced leaf growth or dry weight was seen when young plants were exposed to menthol or to a combination of menthol and menthone [12]. The observation that the youngest leaves were sensitive to the treatment led to the assumption that fumigation with the Mentha volatile bouquet entails modulations of fundamental processes in early leaf development, which results in an enhanced growth of the young leaf. Thus, the responsiveness of transcription factors, in particular of TCPs, to Mentha x piperita monoterpenes could be causative for the modulation of leaf growth and development.
The differentiation process in the developing leaf is regulated by a network of hormones and transcription factors, while TCPs (TEOSINTEBRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR) are of particular importance. The roles and interactions of TCPs have been studied intensively during the last few decades [13,14], but many aspects of the complicated, hierarchically organized network with counteracting and redundant functions in controlling plant developmental processes are still elusive [15,16].
The TCP family is composed of two different classes, class I and class II. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the class II subfamily is further divided into the subclasses CYC/TB1 and CIN. While being under the control of miRNA 319 (miR319), TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, TCP5, TCP10, TCP13, TCP17, and TCP24 regulate leaf development. The miR319 interaction site is located near the 3′ part of the coding region and not within the TCP domain, a characteristic region of the TCPs [17]. This TCP domain is necessary for protein–protein interactions [18]. The miR319 interaction site is of importance for class II TCP mRNA abundance, as downregulation of class II TCPs seems to be regulated by miRNA-mediated degradation of their mRNAs [19]. Thus, high levels of miR319 downregulate these TCPs with effects on leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis [20].
Another group of TCPs have genes lacking the miRNA319 target sequence. The non-miR319-regulated class I TCPs, for instance TCP20 and TCP9, inhibit lipoxygenase 2 gene (LOX2) expression, which is crucial for jasmonate biosynthesis. LOX2 expression is thought to be regulated by the ratios of class I and class II TCP (TCP4) levels [21]. While members of class II TCPs inhibit growth cell division and promote aging, members of class I TCPs have the opposite functions by controlling the expression of specific target genes [22,23]. Non-miR319-regulated TCP20 and TCP9 are also reported to control senescence. TCPs of the same class form homo- or hetero-dimers, which increases the flexibility in interacting with other proteins [19]. The TCP/miRNA interactions, the complex, not yet completely understood regulation processes by TCPs, their known target genes, as well as interaction with plant hormones and jasmonate synthesis, influences of light, temperature, and further factors on TCPs, have recently been reviewed [13].
In this study, the influence of Mentha volatiles on the gene expressions of CIN branch TCPs (TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, TCP10, and TCP24), the non-miR319-regulated class 1 TCP 20 and TCP9, and LOX2 were investigated using the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. These studies were performed to obtain clues concerning the essential interferences of the volatiles with fundamental processes in leaf development after 1, 3, and 7 days of fumigation. The expression of well-known TCP genes of Brassica rapa ssp. Pekinensis, [24,25] was studied after 7 days of fumigation. The major part of our study deals with the impacts of Mentha piperita bouquet volatiles on white cabbage plants in greenhouse and polytunnel trials to reveal conditions that may allow an ecologically acceptable utilization of a positive allelopathic interaction of Mentha bouquet terpenoids for the modulation of leaf development in horticulture.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of Fumigations on the Arabidopsis Phenotype

Fumigation with one Mentha plant of 10 shoots and 3 nodes or with larger plants possessing 5 nodes in the growth chamber severely altered the phenotype of Arabidopsis plants in comparison to the control plants. In the presence of the smaller Mentha plants, Arabidopsis developed larger rosettes with longer narrow leaves and longer petioles. A similar result was obtained with Mentha essential oil. Limonene led to longer petioles, whereas the leaf shape was not changed. With larger Mentha plants, the growth of Arabidopsis was heavily reduced (Figure 1), indicating a strong, negative influence of higher volatile concentrations. The negative growth effects are in agreement with the findings that many terpenes have phytotoxic properties when applied in high concentrations [1].

2.2. Determinations of White and Chinese Cabbage Fresh and Dry Weights after Fumigation with Limonene and Mentha Essential Oil

Fresh and dry weights of the above-ground parts of white and Chinese cabbage plants were determined after fumigation with limonene or Mentha essential oil for one week to estimate threshold ranges of terpenoid concentrations causing inhibitory effects on cabbage growth. In contrast to Arabidopsis, no striking alterations of the phenotypes were observed. Nevertheless, white cabbage developed a significantly higher fresh and dry weight with limonene and a higher dry weight with Mentha essential oil, but a slightly reduced fresh weight (Figure 2). Regarding the fresh weight, Chinese cabbage was less responsive than white cabbage to limonene, although dry weight was also significantly enhanced. Here, Mentha essential oil increased fresh weight with high significance only with the 16 mL dosage.

2.3. TCP Transcription Factors—Targets of Mentha x piperita Emitted Volatiles, Essential Oil Fraction, and Limonene

Because it was intended to address the growth promotion and phenotype modeling of Arabidopsis by Mentha volatile bouquets, TCP gene expressions were investigated with plants fumigated with the smaller Mentha plants. qPCR analysis with cDNA from growth-promoted Arabidopsis plants revealed a strong downregulation of TCP2 and TCP3 transcripts, most exhibited after 3 days of fumigation, and a downregulation of TCP4, strongest at day 7, while TCP 9, TCP10, TCP 20, and TCP24 transcript levels showed a much weaker response and were only slightly, if at all, downregulated (Figure 3). The LOX2 gene expression was ambivalent but tended towards an upregulation at day 7 without significance. Fumigation with the essential oil fraction led to similar results, i.e., a downregulation of TCP2 transcripts after 1 and 3 day(s) and a slight upregulation at day 7. TCP3 mRNA was downregulated at all time points. A weaker response of TCP4 transcripts was stated, with the highest downregulation at day 3. Again, TCP 9 and TCP10 transcripts were only slightly affected, with a low upregulation of TCP9 at day 1 and of TCP10 at day 7, while TCP20 and in particular TCP24 were more strongly downregulated than was found after Mentha bouquet fumigation. The LOX2 transcripts were downregulated. Using limonene for fumigation resulted in similar transcript profiles for TCP3, TCP9, and TCP20; TCP10 was downregulated, but TCP2 and TCP4 were almost not affected. The downregulation of TCP24 was between the one found for the bouquet and essential oil fumigation. Thus, fumigation with limonene had almost no effect on transcripts of TCP2 and TCP4, which were responsive to the complex mixture of the volatiles present in the bouquet and the essential oil. The LOX2 transcript level was similarly affected, as found after the essential oil fumigation. Most of the expression profiles showed a dependence on the fumigation time, in particular TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, and LOX2 transcript abundances.

2.3.1. Expression of TCP Transcription Factors in Chinese Cabbage after Exposure to Mentha Essential Oil Fraction and Limonene

In contrast to Arabidopsis thaliana, Chinese cabbage has two BraTCP2, one BraTCP3, three BraTCP4, one BraTCP10, and two BraTCP24 genes [24,25]. When fumigated with the Mentha essential oil fraction or limonene, expressions of the tested Brassica rapa ssp. Pekinensis TCP transcription factors were considerably less affected than the TCPs of Arabidopsis. With limonene, all TCPs were downregulated in the rage of −0.5 to −2fold, except for TCP2a, which was slightly upregulated, and TCP24a, which was not responsive. With the essential oil fraction, the only downregulated TCP was TCP4a (−3 fold), while TCP4b was 4-fold, but TCP4c was only 0.5-fold upregulated (Figure 4). The latter range of upregulation was also found for TCP2a, TCP3, TCP9a, TCP10, and TCP20b. TCP24b was not responsive, and TCP2b showed a 2-fold, TCP9b and TCP24a each showed a 1-fold, and TCP20a showed an approximate 2-fold upregulation.

2.3.2. Choice of White Cabbage for Greenhouse and Polytunnel Trials

In turnips (Brassica rapa ssp. rapa), Brr/BraTCP2 is involved in leaf development by regulating cell proliferation [25]. According to Efroni et al. [26], CIN-class TCPs have crucial functions, such as being negative regulators of cell proliferation, therefore causing leaf differentiation [24]. Figure 2 and Figure 4 illustrate that the fumigation with limonene and Mentha x piperita essential oil have different impacts on (1) leaf fresh and dry weight and (2) TCP gene expressions. With Chinese cabbage, the study with Mentha essential oil disclosed that head shape modulating TCP4a was the only downregulated TCP gene; all others were upregulated or not responsive. Because downregulation of the CIN-class TCP abundance is a prerequisite for cell proliferation, enhanced leaf growth of Chinese cabbage may not occur when the plants were fumigated with Mentha plants as the fresh and dry weight determinations after limonene and Mentha essential oil fumigation indicated that Chinese cabbage needs higher volatile concentrations than white cabbage to achieve growth responses. Thus, the concentrations of Mentha bouquet compounds may not be high enough for modulating Chinese cabbage leaf growth, but could be high enough for white cabbage. Therefore, and by considering the results of the former pilot study [12], fumigation with Mentha plants in greenhouse and polytunnel experiments were performed with white cabbage and not with Chinese cabbage. The responsiveness of TCP transcription factors towards Mentha volatiles found for Arabidopsis was assumed to be similar in white cabbage.

2.4. Greenhouse and Polytunnel Trials with Brassica oleracea convar. capitata var. alba and Mentha plants

Greenhouse Trial—Leaf Length and Width, Growth Increments

Leaf length and width were measured after 1 (T1), 4 (T2), 8 (T3), 11 (T4), and 15 days (T5) after exposure to Mentha volatiles emitted by one or four plants (Figure S1). At T1 and T2, where only the first and the emerging (T1) or the further developed (T2) second leaves were present, growth showed no significant differences to the controls. At T3 (8 days), the difference in leaf length of control plants and those exposed to four Mentha plants (4M) was significant larger for leaf 2 when the distance to the Mentha plants was more than 35 cm. Leaf 1 was not responsive and leaf 3 tended towards an increased length growth but without significance. Leaf width was not affected at T3. The largest differences were seen with leaf 2 and leaf 4, but particularly with leaf 3 after 15 days (T5) when plants were exposed to four Mentha plants when the distance to the Mentha plants was more than 20 cm. Thus, the number of Mentha plants, dependence on the distance, and the dosage are crucial for leaf parameter modulations. The results indicate again that defined developmental stages of a leaf in combination with the dosage of the volatiles are important for the response to the treatments. To summarize, only the second and third leaves at T3, T4, and T5, and also the fourth leaf, clearly responded to the treatment with bouquet volatiles emitted from four Mentha plants. The highest increases in leaf length and width were obtained at distances exceeding 35 cm.
Measurements of the leaf increments support the observations (Figure 5). Compared to the controls, leaf growth increments show that the responses of leaves 2, 3, and 4 to the Mentha volatiles are significantly higher between 11 and 15 days (T4–T5) of fumigation when the distance to four Mentha plants was more than 25 cm. Increments of fumigated leaves at T1–T2, except for leaf 2, and T2–T3 were similar to the control values. The increments of leaf 2 were continuously larger after 8 days of fumigation but not during the early phase of the treatment.

2.5. Polytunnel Trial—Leaf Length and Width, Growth Increments

Leaf length and width were measured after 1 (T1), 4 (T2), 8 (T3), 12 (T4), and 15 days (T5) after exposure of the plants to volatiles emitted by four or nine Mentha plants. At all time-points, leaf 1 was comparable to the control, thus without response to the treatment. At T2, T3, and T4, the length growth of leaf 2 and, to a lesser degree, leaf 3 were enhanced by the bouquets of four and nine mint plants at both distances. At T5, the growth promoting effect of the volatiles was almost halted in leaf 2 and leaf 3. Leaf width was enhanced only at T3 with high significance and again only in leaf 2 and leaf 3. Thus, for leaf 2 and leaf 3, length growth was more affected than width growth and overall responsiveness, mainly restricted to leaf 2 and leaf 3, occurred between day 4 and day 12 of the treatment (Figure S2).
The increments of leaf growth, depictured in Figure 6, illustrate the dynamics of leaf growth more distinctly. Increments of leaves 2 and 3 occurred mainly between T1–T2 (leaf 2) and T2–T3 (both leaves), while at T3–T4, only four mints had a positive effect on leaf length at both distances. Leaf width did not increase and was even reduced at the short distance with nine Mentha plants. The reduction in increments, compared to control values or even lower values, continued at T4–T5 for all leaves (except for leaf 4) with four mint plants at the larger distance (60–75 cm). The increments demonstrate that the growth promoting effect of Mentha bouquet affected leaves in defined developmental stages only temporarily. No growth promotion was found with leaves that were developed during the late period of the treatment (T5, leaves 4, 5, and 6).

2.6. Greenhous and Polytunnel Trials—Fresh and Dry Weight

The fresh and dry weight of the above-ground plant material was determined after termination of the fumigation at day 21. Fresh and dry weights of the cabbage plants cultured in the greenhouse were enhanced when the distance to one mint was more than 35 cm; with four mint plants, more than 50 cm were necessary to achieve a similar increase (Figure 7). Four Mentha plants led to lower dry masses at the smaller distances. Fresh and dry weights of the entire above-ground plant material mirror the overall growth, while increases must be attributed mainly to the second and third leaves. Nevertheless, the total increase of above-ground biomass fresh weight was in the range of 20% (calculated from mean values) of the above controls for plants growing with a 35–55 cm distance to one Mentha plant. The total dry weight was lower than control values, with the exception of the plants growing with a distance of 55 cm to one Mentha plant. Here, the increase in dry weight was approximately 10%.
As a consequence of the more or less stagnating leaf growth during the late period of the treatment (T5, 15 days) in the polytunnel trial, no enhanced fresh and dry weights of the above-ground plant material was found after treatment termination (21 days) (Figure 7). The cabbage plants cultured in the polytunnel developed more leaves compared to the plants in the greenhouse, due to the different culture conditions (pre-culture in the greenhouse in pots prior the planting in the polytunnel soil). Leaves 7 and 8 were very small and did not considerably contribute to fresh and dry weights. Because of their small size, these leaves were not evaluated further. Taken together, a higher biomass due to the volatile promoted growth of leaves 2 and 3 at T2, T3, and T4 was not a decisive factor when the fresh and dry weights of the above-ground biomass (Figure 7) was determined after 21 days. In comparison to the greenhouse trial with the strongest effects between 11 and 15 days (T4–T5), growth promoting effects occurred much earlier, namely between 4 and 12 days, when the plants were cultured in the polytunnel with 4 and 9 Mentha plants and was characterized by a subsequent decline (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

3. Discussion

Presently, approaches to integrate positive allelopathic interactions in agricultural practices are rarely addressed, although the positive effects of many allelochemicals when applied in low concentrations are well known. This study disclosed some of the difficulties associated with the suitable application and maintenance of plant growth promoting concentrations of Mentha x piperita emitted volatiles and, on the other side, the dynamics in responses of the receiver plants.
The involvement of TCPs indicates that dosage dependent responsiveness to Mentha volatiles starts on superordinated levels that regulate the leaf growth process and is embedded in the entire life cycle of the plant. Causative molecular interactions that lead to modulations of transcriptional activities, resulting perhaps in shifts of the ratios of class I and class II TCP levels, could not be elucidated in this study, nor could the responsiveness of TCP target genes and hormone interactions or levels of miR319. Nevertheless, for a possible interpretation of the results, we would like to address some of the far-reaching downstream events of gene activity cascades that are presumably linked to Mentha volatile induced modulations of TCP transcript abundances.
Treatments with limonene, Mentha essential oil, and Mentha bouquet all downregulated TCP3, TCP24 (both class II CIN branch TCPs), and TCP20, a class I non-miR319-regulated TCP in Arabidopsis. TCP3 negatively affects auxin responses [27]. Auxin is known to be crucial in leaf development for its functions in leaf initiation and influences on leaf size, shape, and form [28,29]. The effects of TCP3 on the auxin response and on flavonoid biosynthesis have been investigated by Li and Zachgo [30]. Thus, downregulation of TCP3 expression might have reverse effects on auxin triggered processes that are under the control of TCP3. Downregulation of TCP3 by Mentha volatiles should therefore influence effects linked with auxin responses. TCP20 is another partner in the auxin network as it regulates the expression of GH3.3. GH3s are known to control the formation of IAA-amino acid conjugates, which are important in maintaining auxin homeostasis [31]. In our study, downregulation of TCP20 gene expression was, however, found to be less severe than that of TCP3. TCP24 suppresses secondary wall thickening [32]; thus, a downregulation of TCP24 transcription can lead to enhanced secondary cell wall formation, which would be in line with the increased dry weights of white cabbage after fumigation with high amounts of Mentha volatiles. Another group of transcription factors (growth-regulating factors (GRFs), which is under the control of miR396 [33], might also be affected, but the study of their expression profiles after Mentha fumigation remains to be carried out.
The results indicate that the positive effects of Mentha volatiles on leaf development probably proceed first from the interactions of volatile components with TCPs. Growth stimulation may later be due to interactions with the auxin network. Other downstream interactions with hormones and proteins are presumable, but further investigations must prove the assumption. The many antagonistic and synergistic interactions and functional redundancies raise difficulties in unambiguous assignments of the observed effects to defined developmental pathways. In addition, alterations in downstream events, performed as counteracting steps by the plant or its associated microorganisms, for instance monoterpene detoxification, may intercept responses to the volatiles.
Down regulation of the gene expression of other transcription factors, such as MYC-2, ANAC, and SCR-SHR, has been found after the application of the monoterpene citral. A binding of citral to these and further transcription factors (SSBPs WHY1, WHY2, and WHY3) was concluded from in silico molecular docking analyses [3]. Godard et al. [34] reported myrcene or ocimene induced expression of transcription factors, stress, and defense genes in Arabidopsis. The gene expression, at least of several plant transcription factors but also of some genes involved in defense, is apparently sensitive to terpenoid volatiles. Thus, it is possible that interactions of terpenoids with transcription factors and perhaps with many other proteins are common features. With MYC-2, ANAC, SCR-SHR, SSBPs WHY1, WHY2, and WHY3, the molecular backgrounds of the modulation are also not yet understood. Sukegawa et al. [11] concluded that there was a fumigation-time dependent epigenetic regulation of the JA- and SA-signaling-dependent defense genes TI and PR1 by Mentha x piperita volatiles in soybean. Here, the transient chromatin acetylation levels of the regulatory promoter region of these genes were immediately changed after starting the fumigation [11]. It cannot be discounted that epigenetic regulation of volatile binding is important at certain stages of the plant’s life cycle, allowing defined gene responses or hindering them, leading to different gene expression profiles and finally to other protein interactions [35]. Some TCPs also seem to be under circadian clock control [36]; thus, transcriptional responses upon fumigation may succumb to diurnal variations. Transient changes in the gene expressions of the TCPs, in combination with the leaf life cycle and the abundance of miR319, and perhaps also epigenetic regulations, could be one reason for the decrease of the growth promoting effect of Mentha volatiles found with the plants grown in the polytunnel during the late phase of fumigation and may explain the failed growth stimulation in oldest leaves.
Further explanations are given by the dosage effects. The greenhouse and the polytunnel trials indicate the possibility of transient TCP-involved interactions. Concentrations of volatiles able to elicit growth effects were reached earlier with a higher number of Mentha plants, and thus the threshold concentration necessary for leaf growth induction in the greenhouse is later in place. Leaf surface can be influential, particularly wax layers. Monoterpenoids have been found to precipitate on wax layers and permeate them subsequently [7]; thus, local concentrations on the leaf may be spotted and increase during the course of fumigation. Because wax deposition on cabbage leaves was found to increase with aging [37], inhibitory amounts of terpenoids can finally accumulate in the wax layer, serving as a local source for the release of the molecules that infiltrate leaf cells underneath. We assume that plants with a thinner wax layer than cabbage, such as Arabidopsis, are more quickly affected by low monoterpene concentrations, which would explain the rapidly altered expression profiles of sensitive TCPs. More for cabbage than for Arabidopsis, the shape of the shoot and the positioning of the leaves are properties that influence the receiving of volatiles by leaves. Nevertheless, with the exception of TCP24, the expression profiles of affected TCPs were surprisingly similar in Arabidopsis when fumigated with small Mentha plants or with Mentha essential oil. Are some of the volatiles better trapped in the wax layers than others? In this case, subsequently different TCP gene expression profiles in cabbage would occur, if their expression is compound specific. For volatile trapping, the structure of the wax crystals, the wax composition, and immersed secondary metabolites, for instance flavonoids, may be of importance for species-dependent differences in the responsiveness to Mentha volatiles. In addition, many plant species have low quantities of di- and triterpenes, sometimes rare ones, deposited in their wax layers, including Arabidopsis and Brassica oleracea [38,39,40], indicating that wax layers are suitable sites for terpenoid deposition. At present, it is speculative to assume an involvement of TCPs, perhaps TCP4, in wax layer modulations and functions.
On the other hand, the amounts of volatiles emitted by the Mentha plants can vary as the terpenoid biosynthesis is modulated by many factors such as season, temperature, wind, leaf and whole plant age, growth of the plant, and, as important modulators, by soil and plant microbiomes. The temperature dependency of Mentha x piperita essential oil composition is known [41]. Menthol and menthone decrease at high temperature, menthylacetate and pulegone increase, and others, such as limonene, are not affected. Consistently, the maintenance of identical volatile compositions over time is unlikely. Altered volatile compositions can be an additional, important reason for shaping the leaf responsiveness. Alterations should be more presumable in the polytunnel trial, with consequences for the leaf growth, because, in this trial, temperature was not controlled.
In summary, the study disclosed the leaf growth promoting and dosage dependent effect of Mentha volatiles in cabbage and Arabidopsis at defined developmental stages. Greenhouse cultures may be more suitable for utilizing the positive effects of Mentha volatiles on the leaf growth of young cabbage plants, and also on other important vegetables. The maintenance of optimal volatile concentrations over time is, however, an essential problem as the concentration depends on air circulation and temperature as well as alterations in the bouquet composition, and is also due to the different chemical properties, such as the volatility, of the constituents.
Although optimization of culture and fumigation conditions are expected to be species dependent and need further extensive research, the ecologically and environmentally friendly utilization of allelopathic volatiles in suitable concentrations for leaf growth promotion seems to be feasible, when harvest times are adapted. The results presented here are in line with our former pilot study [12]. Moreover, the growth promoting effects of Mentha species, when applied in low amounts, have been described by Islam and Kato-Noguchi [42]. Finally, the use of plant volatile bouquets for plant growth promoting effects does not have the potential risk to animal health and the environment as may occur with high amounts of terpenoids [43].

4. Material and methods

4.1. Plant Material

4.1.1. Mentha x piperita Variety English Mint cv. “Mitcham”

For the fumigation of receiver plants, Mentha x piperita L. variety English Mint cv. “Mitcham” was used. The young plants were purchased from a local gardener and grown in a greenhouse (20/16 °C day/night) for approximately one and a half month until the start of the experiments. Two weeks after delivery, Mentha plants were propagated form cuttings. The uniformly-sized Mentha plants were grown for one month under the same conditions as described. The Mentha plants were cut again one week before being grown (4 main shoots with 5 nodes each, if not otherwise noted).

4.1.2. Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0

Seeds of A. thaliana Col-0 were surface sterilized and germinated in petri dishes with standard MS media and 1% sucrose (Murashige & Skoog, without any additives) under sterile conditions. After two days of stratification at 4 °C, the plates were transferred into a growth chamber for germination and growth at 23 °C, 16/8 h day/night. After 10 days, the young seedlings were transferred into small pots (Ø 5 cm) filled with water-saturated soil (“Seedlingsubstrat” from Klaasmann-Deilmann, Germany). Treatments were started one day after pricking.

4.1.3. Brassica oleracea cv. capitata var. alba convar. LENNOX F1 (white cabbage) and Brassica rapa (Chinese cabbage)

White cabbages (Brassica oleracea cv. capitata var. alba convar. LENNOX F1, Bejo Germany) were grown as described in [12]. In short, cabbages were sown in pressed peat pots (4.5 × 4 × 5 cm, cf. Figure 1) and germinated under 16/10 °C day/night conditions in a greenhouse and grown for 14–21 days until the second leaf was approximately 1.5–2 cm long. During this period, the plants were watered once a day. The substrate used for germination and growth was “Potground P” (Klaasmann-Deilmann, Germany). Chinese cabbages (Brassica rapa ssp. Pekinensis, Bilko F1, Bejo, Germany) were similarly cultured.

4.2. Fumigation Experiments

4.2.1. Fumigation of Arabidopsis thaliana with Mentha x piperita Mitcham

For determination of TCP gene expression profiles, standardized Mentha plants were used. A. thaliana seedlings were co-cultured with one Mentha plant of 10 shoots and 3 nodes or with larger plants possessing 5 nodes. A. thaliana control groups were cultured without Mentha plants. These pre-experiments revealed the growth promoting and phenotype modeling properties of smaller Mentha plants, while the larger plants led to growth inhibition of the co-cultured Arabidopsis plants (Figure 1). The following experiments were therefore performed with the smaller Mentha plants. Co-culturing with A. thaliana after one day of acclimation was performed for 1, 3, and 7 days in the growth chamber.

4.2.2. Fumigation of A. thaliana and Brassica plants with Mentha essential oil and limonene for Gene Expression Experiments

A. thaliana plants were treated with steam distillates of English mint essential oil, free of organic solvents (Norfolk Essential Oils, Wisbech, UK) or limonene (Merck Chemicals GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany; companies’ information regarding the products are given in the Supplementary File). Limonene is one of the known components of the Mentha essential oil fractions (in the used essential oil charge: 2.4%) and also of the plant-emitted bouquet. Limonene was also separately applied, because it is the precursor of further monoterpenes. The treatment was performed for one week by injecting the essential oil fraction or limonene into cotton balls swinging approximately 5 cm above the plants (Figure 8 and Figure 9).
These arrangements allow efficient fumigation of the plants with the terpenoids emitted from the cotton balls. Injection was carried out at the start of the experiment and after 3½ days. In total, 4 mL of the essential oil fraction or limonene were applied to Arabidopsis plants per week.

4.3. Real Time PCR

Expression studies were performed to reveal the alterations of TCP transcript abundances during the first week of fumigation. The material for qPCR were obtained by harvesting the innermost part of the Arabidopsis rosettes with the stem apex and emerging leaves. Each sample comprised 43–51 individual plants per time point, i.e., 1, 3, and 7 days after co-cultivation with Mentha plants, application of Mentha essential oil and limonene, respectively, and the corresponding controls. The plant material was collected in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C, if not immediately used for RNA extraction. Material from Brassica rapa (Chinese cabbage) was likewise harvested after 7 days of fumigation with Mentha essential oil or with limonene (Figure 8).
Two replicates were obtained at all three dates, resulting in 6 Arabidopsis samples for the treated and control groups. For mRNA preparation, 100 mg of plant material was used. RNA was extracted with the NucleoSpin® RNA Plant” extraction kit (Macherey and Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity was determined by NanoDrop measurements. For cDNA synthesis, the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was utilized according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Real time PCR was performed as described in [44], with the qPCR-Mix “my-Budget 5× EvaGreen® QPCR-Mix II (ROX)” (Bio-Budget Technologies GmbH, Krefeld, Germany) and the thermocycler Applied Biosystems 7300 Real Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, München, Germany). For all repetition setups with Arabidopsis and for all experiments with Chinese cabbage, the thermocycler CFX Connect (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany) was used. Quantitative analysis was carried out for TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, TCP9, TCP10, TCP20, TCP24, and LOX2 expression. Actin (ACT2) was used as a reference gene. Primers were synthesized by Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany) and are listed in Table S1 [24,45]. The qPCR reaction mixtures (20 µL) contained µL 5× EvaGreen® QPCR-Mix II (ROX, Bio-Budget Technologies GmbH, Krefeld, Germany), 5 µL cDNA sample (15.52 ng/µL), 1 µL forward and reverse Primer Mix (1:1, v/v; 10 µM each), and 10 µL DNase free H2O. For evaluation of RT-qPCR results, the ΔΔCT method was applied.

4.4. Determination of Cabbage Dry and Fresh Weights after Fumigation with High Mentha Essential Oil and Limonene Concentrations

For determinations of fresh and dry weights after applications of high amounts of the volatiles, 18-day-old plants were arranged into groups of 24 plants and set up in rows of 4 × 6 under a transparent hood equipped with four cotton balls, as shown in Figure 9. To ensure that the concentration of chemicals was constantly high throughout the experimental period, the cotton balls were soaked every day with either 8 mL limonene or 14 and 16 mL Mentha essential oil. Cotton balls of the control groups had no volatile injections. This experiment was performed to elucidate threshold ranges of inhibitory volatile concentrations.
Watering of the plants was performed automatically by an ebb and flow system, which was adjusted to flood the table once a day for 8 min. The heating temperature in the greenhouse was set to 18/15 °C day/night, and the aeration temperature to 21 °C. Trials were started in May and lasted until the end of July. The duration of the treatments was 7 days; afterwards, the plants were cut above ground and fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) after drying at 60 °C for two days were determined.

4.5. Greenhouse Trial with Mentha piperita Plants

In early May 2018, treatments were started by placing pots with Mentha plants next to boxes with 120 ten-day-old white cabbage plants for 21 days (Figure 10). The Mentha treatment was run in three plot arrangements with one, four, or no mint plants, the latter as the control. Each plot was placed at a different table with two replicates for each treatment group. The distance between the boxes was 80 cm. The distances of the cabbage plants placed in rows in the boxes to the Mentha plants were: 1st row: 5–10 cm; 2nd row: 20–25 cm; 3rd row: 35–40 cm; 4th row: 50–55 cm. Control plants were placed in a neighbored greenhouse and grown under the same conditions (18/15 °C day/night, 16 °C venting temperature, shading when luminous flux was > 60 klx).
Watering was ensured by an automated ebb and flow system (9 min flow, triggered via light integral of 0.6 kWh). Each table (i.e., plot) had its individual immersion pump powering the ebb and flow system. The watering regime was adjusted to 0.4 kWh after four days. The watering conditions for the control plants were correspondingly adjusted. After 11 days, the light integral was changed to 0.9 kWh until the end of the experiment.

4.6. Polytunnel Trial

Three independent sets were conducted in May and July 2018, following the same design as described for the greenhouse experiments. Four blocks were designed, each consisting of three plots: one untreated control and two co-cultivated plots, here with 4 and 9 mint plants, respectively, taking into account that the air exchange was faster than in the greenhouse. The blocks were arranged as shown in Figure 11, and each block was orthogonally aligned towards the prevailing wind direction.
Mentha plants were placed in front of their respective plots, allowing the air flow to carry the volatiles into the bulk of the cabbage plants. The squarely designed plots had an edge length of 1.05 m with 8 × 8 cabbage plants (Figure 11). Each set was conducted in the same polytunnel. Between the sets, weeds were removed and the roots of the Mentha plants were cut to prevent growing towards the experimental plots. In addition, Mentha plants were cut to maintain equal size and uniformity. The smallest Mentha plant served as reference for the mode of cutting.
After sowing, the young cabbage seedlings of each set were grown for 21 days in a greenhouse, as described above, before planting into the soil covered by the polytunnel. Each set of experiments was run for 22 days before cutting the plants for fresh and dry matter determination. Set 2 was started 8 days after set 1, and set 3 was started 6 days after set 2.
Watering in the tunnel was carried out by a sprinkler system; once a day for at least 30 min in the first three days after bedding out, then when necessary but at least two to three times a week.

4.7. Measurements of Leaf Parameters

Leaf parameters were determined with leaves longer than 15 mm. Measurement of leaf length and width was performed after 1, 4, 8, 11, and 15 days after exposure to mint volatiles (T1–T5) with plants at 4 different distances (1st row: 5–10 cm; 2nd: 20–25 cm; 3rd: 35–40 cm; 4th: 50–55 cm), and scored as shown in Figure 10. Regarding the polytunnel trial, the leaf parameters length and width were determined for 12 individual plants/plot and at two different distances (1st row: 15–30 cm; 2nd row: 60–75 cm) once a week, 1 (T1), 8 (T3), and 15 (T5) days after the start of co-cultivation (set 1). In the second set, an additional measurement was taken on day 12 (T4) after treatment, and in the third set additional measurements were conducted after 5 (T2) and 12 (T4) days. The methods were the same as described for the greenhouse trial. Evaluations were performed with data obtained from at least 2 plots of identical conditions. Rates of leaf growth increments were determined for T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, and T4–T5. For calculations, zero growth rates were not considered; the quantity of plants/plots showing no increment are mentioned in the text (or Table S1).

4.8. Fresh and Dry Weight

To determine dry matter percentage, plants used for leaf parameter determinations were cut above ground 21 days after treatment. After fresh weight measurements, the plant material was placed in an oven at 105 °C for five days and then used for dry weight determinations.

4.9. Statistics

All measured variables were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or to the Kruskal–Wallis test in the case of no Gaussian distribution to verify the differences between the means (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Normality was tested according to Anderson–Darling, DÁgostino–Pearson, Shapiro–Wilk, and Kolmogorow–Smirnov. Results are presented in the figures as means + standard error of means. Student’s t-tests were performed in addition and p-values provided in the results.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11223078/s1, Figure S1: Greenhouse trial leaf growth; Figure S2: Polytunnel trial leaf growth, Table S1: Primer Used for Real Time PCR. Suppliers Volatile Oil Analyses and Certificates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and A.U.; methodology, M.S. and A.U.; investigation, M.P., M.V. and J.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S., M.P. and A.U.; supervision, M.S. and A.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the technical staff in the greenhouse and polytunnel trials for assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Verdeguer, M.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M.; Araniti, F. Phytotoxic Effects and Mechanism of Action of Essential Oils and Terpenoids. Plants 2020, 9, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Araniti, F.; Bruno, L.; Sunseri, F.; Pacenza, M.; Forgione, I.; Bitonti, M.B.; Abenavoli, M.R. The allelochemical farnesene affects Arabidopsis thaliana root meristem altering auxin distribution. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 121, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Graña, E.; Díaz-Tielas, C.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M.; Reigosa, M.J.; Celeiro, M.; Abagyan, R.; Teijeira, M.; Duke, M.V.; Clerk, T.; Pan, Z.; et al. Transcriptome and binding data indicate that citral inhibits single strand DNA-binding proteins. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 169, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sarheed, M.M.; Rajabi, F.; Kunert, M.; Boland, W.; Wetters, S.; Miadowitz, K.; Kazmierczak, A.; Sahi, V.P.; Nick, P. Cellular Base of Mint Allelopathy: Menthone Affects Plant Microtubules. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 546345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chaimovitsh, D.; Shachter, A.; Abu-Abied, M.; Rubin, B.; Sadot, F.; Dudai, N. Herbicidal activity of monoterpenes is associated with disruption of microtubule functionality and membrane integrity. Weed Sci. 2017, 65, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kriegs, B.; Jansen, M.; Hahn, K.; Peisker, H.; Samajova, O.; Beck, M.; Braun, M.; Ulbrich, A.; Baluska, F.; Schulz, M. Cyclic monoterpene mediated modulations of Arabidopsis thaliana phenotype—Effects on the cytoskeleton and on the expression of selected genes. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 832–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Schulz, M.; Kussmann, P.; Knop, M.; Kriegs, B.; Gresens, F.; Eichert, T.; Ulbrich, A.; Marx, F.; Fabricius, H.; Goldbach, H.; et al. Allelopathic monoterpenes interfere with Arabidopsis thaliana cuticular waxes and enhance transpiration. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cappellari, L.D.R.; Santoro, M.V.; Schmidt, A.; Gershenzon, J.; Banchio, E. Improving Phenolic Total Content and Monoterpene in Mentha x piperita by Using Salicylic Acid or Methyl Jasmonate Combined with Rhizobacteria Inoculation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sukegawa, S.; Shiojiri, K.; Higami, T.; Suzuki, S.; Arimura, G.-I. Pest management using mint volatiles to elicit resistance in soy: Mechanism and application potential. Plant J. 2018, 96, 910–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Grulova, D.; De Martino, L.; Mancini, E.; Salamon, I.; De Feo, V. Seasonal variability of the main components in essential oil of Mentha × piperita L. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kjonaas, R.; Croteau, R. Demonstration that Limonene is the First Cyclic Intermediate in the Biosynthesis of Oxygenated p-Menthane Monoterpenes in Mentha piperita and Other Mentha Species. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1983, 220, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ulbrich, A.; Kahle, H.; Kramer, P.; Schulz, M. Mentha x piperita volatiles promote Brassica oleracea—A pilot study for sustainable vegetable production. Allelopath. J. 2018, 43, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lan, J.; Qin, G. The Regulation of CIN-like TCP Transcription Factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schommer, C.; Debernardi, J.M.; Bresso, E.G.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Palatnik, J.F. Repression of cell proliferation by miR319-regulated TCP4. Mol. Plant. 2014, 7, 1533–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Urano, K.; Maruyama, K.; Koyama, T.; Gonzalez, N.; Inzé, D.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. CIN-like TCP13 is essential for plant growth regulation under dehydration stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 108, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hao, J.; Lou, P.; Han, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, J.; Ni, J.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Xu, M. GrTCP11, a Cotton TCP Transcription Factor, Inhibits Root Hair Elongation by Down-Regulating Jasmonic Acid Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 769675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baulies, J.L.; Bresso, E.G.; Goldy, C.; Palatnik, J.F.; Schommer, C. Potent inhibition of TCP transcription factors by miR319 ensures proper root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 108, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Danisman, S. TCP transcription factors at the interface between environmental challenges and the plant’s growth responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Palatnik, J.F.; Allen, E.; Wu, X.; Schommer, C.; Schwab, R.; Carrington, J.C.; Weigel, D. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 2003, 425, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bresso, E.G.; Chorostecki, U.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Palatnik, J.F.; Schommer, C. Spatial Control of Gene Expression by miR319-Regulated TCP Transcription Factors in Leaf Development. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1694–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Danisman, S.; van der Wal, F.; Dhondt, S.; Waites, R.; de Folter, S.; Bimbo, A.; van Dijk, A.D.; Muino, J.M.; Cutri, L.; Dornelas, M.C.; et al. Arabidopsis class I and class II TCP transcription factors regulate jasmonic acid metabolism and leaf development antagonistically. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1511–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Li, Y.; An, S.; Cheng, Q.; Zong, Y.; Chen, W.; Guo, W.; Zhang, L. Analysis of Evolution, Expression and Genetic Transformation of TCP Transcription Factors in Blueberry Reveal That VcTCP18 Negatively Regulates the Release of Flower Bud Dormancy. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 697609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, D.; Zhang, H.; Mou, M.; Chen, Y.; Xiang, S.; Chen, L.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis Class II TCP Transcription Factors Integrate with the FT–FD Module to Control Flowering. Plant Physiol. 2019, 181, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mao, Y.; Wu, F.; Yu, X.; Bai, J.; Zhong, W.; He, Y. microRNA319a-Targeted Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis TCP Genes Modulate Head Shape in Chinese Cabbage by Differential Cell Division Arrest in Leaf Regions. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Du, J.; Hu, S.; Yu, Q.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.; Yang, Y.; Sun, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of BrrTCP Transcription Factors in Brassica rapa ssp. rapa. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Efroni, I.; Blum, E.; Goldshmidt, A.; Eshed, Y. A Protracted and Dynamic Maturation Schedule Underlies Arabidopsis Leaf Development. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2293–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Koyama, T.; Mitsuda, N.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M. TCP transcription factors regulate the activities of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and miR164, as well as the auxin response, during differentiation of leaves in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3574–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Xiong, Y.; Jiao, Y. The Diverse Roles of Auxin in Regulating Leaf Development. Plants 2019, 23, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Saini, K.; Markakis, M.N.; Zdanio, M.; Balcerowicz, D.M.; Beeckman, T.; De Veylder, L.; Prinsen, E.; Beemster, G.T.S.; Vissenberg, K. Alteration in Auxin Homeostasis and Signaling by Overexpression of PINOID Kinase Causes Leaf Growth Defects in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Li, S.; Zachgo, S. TCP3 interacts with R2R3-MYB proteins, promotes flavonoid biosynthesis and negatively regulates the auxin response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2013, 76, 901–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kong, Q.; Low, P.M.; Lim, A.R.Q.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, L.; Ma, W. Functional Antagonism of WRI1 and TCP20 Modulates GH3.3 Expression to Maintain Auxin Homeostasis in Roots. Plants 2022, 11, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, H.; Mao, Y.; Yang, J.; He, Y. TCP24 modulates secondary cell wall thickening and anther endothecium development. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Omidbakhshfard, M.A.; Proost, S.; Fujikura, U.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Growth-Regulating Factors (GRFs): A Small Transcription Factor Family with Important Functions in Plant Biology. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Godard, K.-A.; White, R.; Bohlmann, J. Monoterpene-induced molecular responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 1838–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Onosato, H.; Fujimoto, G.; Higami, T.; Sakamoto, T.; Yamada, A.; Suzuki, T.; Ozawa, R.; Matsunaga, S.; Seki, M.; Ueda, M.; et al. Sustained defense response via volatile signaling and its epigenetic transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 922–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nie, Y.; Han, F.; Ma, J.; Chen, X.; Song, Y.-T.; Niu, S.-H.; Wu, H.X. Genome-wide TCP transcription factors analysis provides insight into their new functions in seasonal and diurnal growth rhythm in Pinus tabuliformis. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Laila, R.; Robin, A.H.K.; Yang, K.; Park, J.-I.; Suh, M.C.; Kim, J.; Nou, I.-S. Developmental and Genotypic Variation in Leaf Wax Content and Composition, and in Expression of Wax Biosynthetic Genes in Brassica oleracea var. capitata. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Martelanc, M.; Vovk, I.; Simonovska, B. Determination of three major triterpenoids in epicuticular wax of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and mass spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1164, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Buschhaus, C.; Jetter, R. Composition and Physiological Function of the Wax Layers Coating Arabidopsis Leaves: β-Amyrin Negatively Affects the Intracuticular Water Barrier. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 1120–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hadacek, F. Cuticular Wax Terpenoids in Plants: Functional Diversity of. In Encyclopedia of Lipidomics; Wenk, M., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Heydari, M.; Zanfardino, A.; Taleei, A.; Shahnejat Bushehri, A.A.; Hadian, J.; Maresca, V.; Sorbo, S.; Di Napoli, M.; Varcamonti, M.; Basile, A.; et al. Effect of Heat Stress on Yield, Monoterpene Content and Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils of Mentha x piperita var. Mitcham and Mentha arvensis var. piperascens. Molecules 2018, 23, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Islam, A.K.M.M.; Kato-Noguchi, H. Mentha sylvestris: A Potential Allelopathic Medicinal Plant. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2013, 15, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar]
  43. Maes, C.; Meersmans, J.; Lins, L.; Bouquillon, S.; Fauconnier, M.-L. Essential Oil-Based Bioherbicides: Human Health Risks Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Girel, S.; Schütz, V.; Bigler, L.; Dörmann, P.; Schulz, M. Bioactive Nitrosylated and Nitrated N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)acetamides and Derived Oligomers: An Alternative Pathway to 2-Amidophenol-Derived Phytotoxic Metabolites. Molecules 2022, 27, 4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Danisman, S.; van Dijk, A.D.J.; Bimbo, A.; van der Wal, F.; Hennig, L.; de Folter, S.; Angenent, G.C.; Immink, R.G.H. Analysis of functional redundancies within the Arabidopsis TCP transcription factor family. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 5673–5685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effects of volatile bouquets emitted from different sized Mentha plants on the phenotype of Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0. (A): Mentha plant of 10 shoots and 3 nodes; (B): control; (C): Mentha plants of 10 shoots and 5 nodes. Fumigation time was one week.
Figure 1. Effects of volatile bouquets emitted from different sized Mentha plants on the phenotype of Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0. (A): Mentha plant of 10 shoots and 3 nodes; (B): control; (C): Mentha plants of 10 shoots and 5 nodes. Fumigation time was one week.
Plants 11 03078 g001
Figure 2. Fresh (FW) and dry weight (DW) of above-ground plant material after 1-week-fumigation in the greenhouse with high concentrations of limonene (8 mL/day) and Mentha essential oil (14 or 16 mL/day) and controls. White cabbage: light grey (FW), dark grey (DW); Chinese cabbage: dark green (FW), green (DW). Mentha oil 16 indicates 16 mL/day, for all other treatments 14 mL/day were used. Significance: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005), green asterisks: increase, red asterisk: reduction.
Figure 2. Fresh (FW) and dry weight (DW) of above-ground plant material after 1-week-fumigation in the greenhouse with high concentrations of limonene (8 mL/day) and Mentha essential oil (14 or 16 mL/day) and controls. White cabbage: light grey (FW), dark grey (DW); Chinese cabbage: dark green (FW), green (DW). Mentha oil 16 indicates 16 mL/day, for all other treatments 14 mL/day were used. Significance: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005), green asterisks: increase, red asterisk: reduction.
Plants 11 03078 g002
Figure 3. TCP gene expression in Arabidopsis is modulated by Mentha volatiles. Expression of class II TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, TCP5, TCP10, TCP13, TCP17, TCP24, and class I TCP20 and TCP9 genes, LOX2 (LOX) after the different types of fumigation. A: Mentha plant; B: Mentha essential oil; C: limonene. The figure shows mean values and standard error of means (n = 2 samples, each sample prepared from 43–51 plants per time point).
Figure 3. TCP gene expression in Arabidopsis is modulated by Mentha volatiles. Expression of class II TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, TCP5, TCP10, TCP13, TCP17, TCP24, and class I TCP20 and TCP9 genes, LOX2 (LOX) after the different types of fumigation. A: Mentha plant; B: Mentha essential oil; C: limonene. The figure shows mean values and standard error of means (n = 2 samples, each sample prepared from 43–51 plants per time point).
Plants 11 03078 g003
Figure 4. Expression of Brassica rapa ssp. Pekinensis TCP transcription factors in response to Mentha x piperita essential oil and limonene. A: limonene; B: Mentha essential oil. The figure shows mean values and standard error of means (n = 2 composed samples).
Figure 4. Expression of Brassica rapa ssp. Pekinensis TCP transcription factors in response to Mentha x piperita essential oil and limonene. A: limonene; B: Mentha essential oil. The figure shows mean values and standard error of means (n = 2 composed samples).
Plants 11 03078 g004
Figure 5. Greenhouse Trial: Increments (cm y-axis, consider graph right 90° rotation) in length (green) and width (olive) of the first two to four leaves (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, and T4–T5) at four difference distances (0.5–10, 20–25, 35–40 and 50–55 cm, x-axis, consider graph right 90° rotation) in control plants (no Mentha), plants exposed to one Mentha (1 M), and plants exposed to four Mentha (4 M) plants. Green asterisks indicate significantly increased growth, red asterisk significant lower growth compared to the controls, bars without asterisk: no significance. Enhanced increments occurred predominantly during the late period of fumigation with leaf 2 (T3–T4) and with leaves 2, 3, and 4 at T4–T5. The figure shows mean values and standard error of means (n = 16). Significance with reference to the appropriate cm control (no fumigation), (t-test): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005). Red labels give the increment (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, and T4–T5) and the leaf number (L1, L2, L3, L4).
Figure 5. Greenhouse Trial: Increments (cm y-axis, consider graph right 90° rotation) in length (green) and width (olive) of the first two to four leaves (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, and T4–T5) at four difference distances (0.5–10, 20–25, 35–40 and 50–55 cm, x-axis, consider graph right 90° rotation) in control plants (no Mentha), plants exposed to one Mentha (1 M), and plants exposed to four Mentha (4 M) plants. Green asterisks indicate significantly increased growth, red asterisk significant lower growth compared to the controls, bars without asterisk: no significance. Enhanced increments occurred predominantly during the late period of fumigation with leaf 2 (T3–T4) and with leaves 2, 3, and 4 at T4–T5. The figure shows mean values and standard error of means (n = 16). Significance with reference to the appropriate cm control (no fumigation), (t-test): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005). Red labels give the increment (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, and T4–T5) and the leaf number (L1, L2, L3, L4).
Plants 11 03078 g005
Figure 6. Polytunnel Trial: Consider graph right 90o rotation. Increments in length (green) and width (olive) of the first three to four leaves (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, T4–T5) at two difference distances (15–30 cm and 60–75 cm) in control plants (no Mentha), plants exposed to four Mentha (4 M), and plants exposed to nine Mentha (9 M) plants. Green asterisks indicate significantly increased growth, red asterisks indicates significantly lower growth compared to the controls, bars without asterisk: no significance; n= 24. Enhanced growth is primarily found during the early period of fumigation with leaves 2 and 3, while during the late period, a significantly inhibited or at least a reduced growth of these leaves was predominately seen. Significance with reference to the appropriate cm control (no fumigation), (t-test): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005). Red labels give the increment (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, and T4–T5) and the leaf number (L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6).
Figure 6. Polytunnel Trial: Consider graph right 90o rotation. Increments in length (green) and width (olive) of the first three to four leaves (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, T4–T5) at two difference distances (15–30 cm and 60–75 cm) in control plants (no Mentha), plants exposed to four Mentha (4 M), and plants exposed to nine Mentha (9 M) plants. Green asterisks indicate significantly increased growth, red asterisks indicates significantly lower growth compared to the controls, bars without asterisk: no significance; n= 24. Enhanced growth is primarily found during the early period of fumigation with leaves 2 and 3, while during the late period, a significantly inhibited or at least a reduced growth of these leaves was predominately seen. Significance with reference to the appropriate cm control (no fumigation), (t-test): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005). Red labels give the increment (T1–T2, T2–T3, T3–T4, and T4–T5) and the leaf number (L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6).
Plants 11 03078 g006
Figure 7. (A): Greenhouse trial: Fresh and dry weights after termination of the treatment (means + standard error of means). (B): Polytunnel Trial: Fresh and dry weights after termination of treatment (means + standard error of means). Light grey bars: fresh weight; dark grey bark dry weight. Green asterisks indicate increase, red asterisk inhibition, significance levels: (t-test): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005); bars without asterisk: no significance. Notice that the number of plants used for fresh and dry weight determinations was different compared to the greenhouse trial, due to the different arrangements.
Figure 7. (A): Greenhouse trial: Fresh and dry weights after termination of the treatment (means + standard error of means). (B): Polytunnel Trial: Fresh and dry weights after termination of treatment (means + standard error of means). Light grey bars: fresh weight; dark grey bark dry weight. Green asterisks indicate increase, red asterisk inhibition, significance levels: (t-test): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005); bars without asterisk: no significance. Notice that the number of plants used for fresh and dry weight determinations was different compared to the greenhouse trial, due to the different arrangements.
Plants 11 03078 g007
Figure 8. One-week-fumigation of cabbage and Arabidopsis for gene expression experiments. (A): Cabbage plants were fumigated with volatile-loaded cotton balls. Controls were with volatile-free cotton balls. (B): Fumigation arrangement of Arabidopsis with one Mentha plant in the growth chamber. (C): Control, (D): Limonene-fumigated Arabidopsis after 7 days. (E,F): Harvested shoot material for gene expression studies. The innermost parts of the Arabidopsis rosettes and shoot apex containing material of cabbage plants (white rings) were harvested and used for RNA extraction. Pictures (E) and (F) show control plants. (E): Arabidopsis; (F): Chinese cabbage.
Figure 8. One-week-fumigation of cabbage and Arabidopsis for gene expression experiments. (A): Cabbage plants were fumigated with volatile-loaded cotton balls. Controls were with volatile-free cotton balls. (B): Fumigation arrangement of Arabidopsis with one Mentha plant in the growth chamber. (C): Control, (D): Limonene-fumigated Arabidopsis after 7 days. (E,F): Harvested shoot material for gene expression studies. The innermost parts of the Arabidopsis rosettes and shoot apex containing material of cabbage plants (white rings) were harvested and used for RNA extraction. Pictures (E) and (F) show control plants. (E): Arabidopsis; (F): Chinese cabbage.
Plants 11 03078 g008
Figure 9. Experimental setup of cabbage plants in 4 culture boxes for limonene and Mentha essential oil fumigations in the greenhouse. Distances between culture boxes: 60 cm. (A,C): plants and cotton balls in one box ((B): inserted scheme in the picture of culture box arrangements in the greenhouse). (D): cabbage plants used for fresh and dry weight determination.
Figure 9. Experimental setup of cabbage plants in 4 culture boxes for limonene and Mentha essential oil fumigations in the greenhouse. Distances between culture boxes: 60 cm. (A,C): plants and cotton balls in one box ((B): inserted scheme in the picture of culture box arrangements in the greenhouse). (D): cabbage plants used for fresh and dry weight determination.
Plants 11 03078 g009
Figure 10. Greenhouse trial. Arrangement of plots (A,B above) and experimental setup of a single box (8 replications) containing 120 plants (B below). The setups in two different greenhouses were carried out in a completely randomized design. Orange box = scored plant (repeated measurements); X = unused plant.
Figure 10. Greenhouse trial. Arrangement of plots (A,B above) and experimental setup of a single box (8 replications) containing 120 plants (B below). The setups in two different greenhouses were carried out in a completely randomized design. Orange box = scored plant (repeated measurements); X = unused plant.
Plants 11 03078 g010
Figure 11. Polytunnel trial. Schema of the experimental setup: total experimental design (A) and of a single plot (B). Dimensions, the prevailing wind direction, and the positions of individual plots and mints are indicated; (C): control plants, 9 and 4: plants exposed to 9 and 4 mints (green bars). orange box = scored plant (repeated measurements); X = unused plant. (C): Arrangements of cabbage and Mentha plants in the Polytunnel soil; (D): picture of a single plot.
Figure 11. Polytunnel trial. Schema of the experimental setup: total experimental design (A) and of a single plot (B). Dimensions, the prevailing wind direction, and the positions of individual plots and mints are indicated; (C): control plants, 9 and 4: plants exposed to 9 and 4 mints (green bars). orange box = scored plant (repeated measurements); X = unused plant. (C): Arrangements of cabbage and Mentha plants in the Polytunnel soil; (D): picture of a single plot.
Plants 11 03078 g011
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Preusche, M.; Vahl, M.; Riediger, J.; Ulbrich, A.; Schulz, M. Modulating Expression Levels of TCP Transcription Factors by Mentha x piperita Volatiles—An Allelopathic Tool to Influence Leaf Growth? Plants 2022, 11, 3078. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223078

AMA Style

Preusche M, Vahl M, Riediger J, Ulbrich A, Schulz M. Modulating Expression Levels of TCP Transcription Factors by Mentha x piperita Volatiles—An Allelopathic Tool to Influence Leaf Growth? Plants. 2022; 11(22):3078. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Preusche, Matthias, Marvin Vahl, Johanna Riediger, Andreas Ulbrich, and Margot Schulz. 2022. "Modulating Expression Levels of TCP Transcription Factors by Mentha x piperita Volatiles—An Allelopathic Tool to Influence Leaf Growth?" Plants 11, no. 22: 3078. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop