Next Article in Journal
Application of Native or Exotic Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Complexes and Monospecific Isolates from Saline Semi-Arid Mediterranean Ecosystems Improved Phoenix dactylifera’s Growth and Mitigated Salt Stress Negative Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Undifferentiated In Vitro Cultured Actinidia deliciosa as Cell Factory for the Production of Quercetin Glycosides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photosynthetic Properties of Co-Occurring Pioneer Species on Volcanically Devastated Sites in Miyake-jima Island, Japan

1
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
2
Eco-Environment Design and Research Institute, China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu 610031, China
3
College of Biology and Agricultural Resources, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang 438000, China
4
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(11), 2500; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112500
Submission received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 3 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021

Abstract

:
Pioneer species differing in their inherent ecological characteristics (e.g., N-fixing ability, photosynthetic pathway) can have a large impact on local ecosystems in the early stages of volcanic succession. However, it remains unclear as to how these pioneer species adapt to the extreme environment of volcanically devastated sites in terms of ecophysiological leaf traits. In this study, we compared the leaf traits (including morphological, physiological) of three co-occurring pioneer species, including a C4 non-N-fixing grass, a C3 N-fixing tree, and a C3 non-N-fixing herb from a newly created (18 years after eruption) volcanically devastated site in Miyake-jima, Japan. Our results showed that three pioneer species have different sets of leaf traits that are associated with their ecophysiological growth advantages, respectively. Miscanthus condensatus shows the highest light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax). The higher Amax were partially the result of higher water use efficiency (WUE) and photosynthetic N-use efficiency (PNUE). The PNUE in M. condensatus appears to be high, even for a C4 grass. Alnus sieboldiana rely on its N-fixing ability, has a higher leaf N content (Narea) that compensates for its photosynthetic machinery (Rubisco), and further ensures its photosynthetic capacity. Fallopia japonica var. hachidyoensis has a higher leaf mass per area (LMA), chlorophyll content (Chl), and maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), demonstrating its higher light capturing ability. These results make it possible to predict certain ecological processes that take place in the early stages of volcanic succession resulting from ecological characteristics and from some key leaf traits of pioneer species. It also provides a theoretical basis for species selection and species combination for volcanic ecological restoration.

1. Introduction

Volcanic eruptions are major natural disturbances with varied and complex consequences [1]. Among the nutritional constraints, nitrogen (N) limitation largely impedes plant growth on the early stages of volcanic deposits [2,3]; only a limited number of pioneer species can adapt to harsh volcanic environments due to their inherent ecological characteristics (e.g., C4 photosynthesis pathway with higher CO2 utilization rate and lower water demand and N-fixing ability). Pioneer species generally have certain characteristics that allow them to grow and persist in harsh condition. Several studies that have clarified the success pioneer species under harsh volcanic environments have focused on vegetation (growth form), life history (dormancy form), phenology, seed biology [4], biomorphology (e.g., root architecture, shoot shape), and seed viability (seed size/mass) [5,6]. However, from the perspective of photosynthetic-related leaf traits (including morphological, physiological), which are closely related to plant fitness and survival strategies [7] and are essential for the successful maintenance and expansion of populations, have received little attention [8,9,10,11].
The leaf traits that are associated with plant growth strategies are consistently affected by the ecological characteristics of a species, such as the photosynthetic pathway (C3 or C4) [12] or the N-fixing ability [13,14]. Many studies have focused on leaf traits in relation to the ecological characteristics of a species [15,16,17,18]. Some studies have shown significant overall leaf trait differences between species that differ with respect to the photosynthetic pathway and/or N-fixing ability [19,20,21]; nevertheless, the magnitude of these differences is influenced by environmental conditions and the plant functional group [19,20,21,22]. N-fixing ability is one of the key ecological characteristics that cause a plant to be able to successfully colonize and establish itself, especially in N-poor ecosystems. The colonization of new surfaces by N-fixing plant species results in the greatly improved soil fertility, ecosystem process rates, and nutrition of co-occurring non-N-fixing plant species [23,24,25]. Further, N-fixing species often have resource conservative strategies that can be associated with higher N concentrations (Narea) in the their leaves [13,26], a lower leaf mass per area (LMA) [27,28], and lower photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE) [29], as these species have continuous N input that can be achieved through biological N fixation ability when compared to non-N-fixing species; again, these traits could lead to large ecosystem-level consequences. For those species without N-fixing ability but that are differing in terms if the photosynthetic pathway, there is a general suite of leaf trait divergences between C3 and C4 species, with most evidence coming from the Poaceae family, the family from which C4 photosynthesis has evolved from multiple times independently [30]. Across a sample of 382 C3 and C4 grasses, Atkinson et al. [31] found that LMA was significantly higher in C4 species than it was in C3 species. Together, these traits enable greater energy capture for a given leaf mass investment [28,32], and in combination with the higher photosynthetic efficiencies of different C4 species, led to a growth advantage of C4 species [31]. In addition, the C4 CO2-concentrating mechanism also ensures that the C4 species fix more carbon for a given investment in photosynthetic proteins, leading to higher nitrogen-use efficiency and, as a consequence, a lower leaf nitrogen requirement [33,34,35,36], ensuring their success. However, to our knowledge, the PNUE differences of C3, C4, and N-fixer that co-occur in a volcanic N-deficient habitat have not been directly compared. Furthermore, if the key leaf traits of co-occurring pioneer species do indeed differ from the N-fixing ability and photosynthetic pathway under a volcanic N-deficiency habitat, then the impacts of plant species on ecological processes such as productivity could potentially be predicted from their photosynthetic pathway and N fixation ability.
To understand the variation in the key leaf traits that are associated with the ecological strategies of volcanic pioneer species differing in N-fixing ability and in the photosynthetic pathway, we compared the leaf traits for three co-occurring pioneer species in an early successional volcanic system in Miyake-jima Island, Japan. Alnus sieboldiana (a C3 N-fixing tree), Miscanthus condensatus (a perennial C4 grass), and Fallopia japonica var. hachidyoensis (a perennial C3 herb) are common pioneer species that co-occur on a volcanically devastated site in Miyake-jima [37,38]. Among these three species, A. sieboldiana (with N-fixing ability) can partially grow in volcanic N-deficiency deserts, as it has the ability to fix N in the atmosphere via symbiosis with nitrogen-fixers. Additionally, Choi et al. [39] also proved its success in resisting high concentrations of volcanic gas (SO2) in the Miyake-jima volcano. Regarding M. condensatus, our previous study [11] in the volcanically devastated site in Miyake-jima indicated that the relatively high light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax) and PNUE of M. condensatus were its adaptation advantages to volcanically N-deplete habitats. As for F. japonica, Sakata et al. (2006) [40] indicated that at the higher activation state, the Rubisco in Aconogonum weyrichii (closely related species of F. japonica) can also be regarded as an adaptive feature in summer, as it allows for intensive dry-matter production within the short growing period. Although these three species are studied individually in different habitats, we know very little about their physiological response to a sole harsh volcanic habitat with multi adverse factors. Further, to the best of our knowledge, there almost no comparative studies of the PNUE of pioneer species on single volcanically devastated site. Likewise, this study provides some evidence to study ecophysiological patterns compared to those that are known for other similar N-limited habitats, those in in Japan [40], Hawaii [20,41], Australia [42], and New Zealand [43], for example.
Based on the information above, we described plant strategies using 12 key leaf traits to test the following hypotheses:
(1) Leaf traits associated with carbon capture strategies are consistently affected and by N fixation ability [13,26]. Additionally, as N would be the primary limiting factor in a volcanically devastated site, we expected that the N-fixing pioneer species would show leaf traits that are related to conservative strategies (higher Narea with relatively low Amax, PNUE) [13,26,29], while the non-N-fixing pioneer species should have opposite strategies.
(2) Between two non-N-fixing species, M. condensatus should have more resource-acquisitive leaves than F. japonica, showing lower LMA values but higher PNUE and water use efficiency (WUE) values in M. condensatus.
In testing our hypotheses, the specific goals were to (1) document the lead trait values of three pioneer species in the early stages of a volcanically devastated site and to (2) examine whether the leaf trait relationships varied among three pioneer species.

2. Results

2.1. Growth Condition of Three Pioneer Species

Table 1 shows the growth conditions of each species during the entirety of the measurement period. There were almost no differences in canopy openness (CO), precipitation, or air temperature (AT) at each species (Table 1). The total C content (STC) and N content (STN) in the soil under the A. sieboldiana and F. japonica individuals were significantly higher than the total C content found under M. condensatus (Table 1). All of the individuals were measured in newly volcanically devastated site.

2.2. Species Difference in Leaf Traits

Table 2 and Table 3 show the measured leaf traits that are associated with each traits’ function as well as their mean values of each pioneer species. Almost all of the leaf traits (except light compensation point (LCP)) differed significantly (Table 3) among the three species. For the morphological leaf traits, the LA of M. condensatus was significantly higher (Table 3) than it was A. sieboldiana and F. japonica, whereas the LMA of F. japonica was significantly higher (Table 3) than it was for the other two species. For the physiological leaf traits, the Amax, PNUE, and WUE of M. condensatus were significantly higher than they were for A. sieboldiana and F. japonica (Table 3), whereas the transpiration rate (E) was lower. The Narea and the dark respiration rate (DR) of A. sieboldiana was the highest among the three species (Table 3). For F. japonica, the LMA, Fv/Fm, and Chl content were significantly higher than they were A. sieboldiana and F. japonica (Table 3). We can find that F. japonica is better at light capture and that M. condensatus is better in terms of N use.

2.3. Trait’s Relationships of Three Pioneer Species

Correlation analyses showed that the Narea was not significantly correlated with Amax among the three species (Figure 1A). On the other hand, the Narea was negatively correlated with the PUNE for A. sieboldiana and M. condensatus (Figure 1B). LMA was significant positively correlated with Amax and PNUE for A. sieboldiana but was negatively correlated for M. condensatus (Figure 1C). As for F. japonica, there were no significant relationships between LMA, Amax, and PNUE (Figure 1B–D).

3. Discussion

3.1. Trait Comparison to Previous Studies

Our study first provides some ecophysiological evidence for the success of volcanic pioneer species living at the volcanically devastated habitat in Miyake-jima compared to previous studies. In general, species from N-poor soils had lower leaf N concentrations and photosynthetic capacities than those from N-rich soils. However, we found that the key leaf trait values (Narea, Amax, and PNUE) of three pioneer species were within the normal ranges reported for the C4 non-N-fixing grasses, C3 non-N-fixing herbs, and C3 N-fixing trees worldwide (Glopnet) (Table A1) [28]. The average values of Narea for F. japonica and Amax for A. sieboldiana are even higher than the leaf traits from the N-rich habitat (Table A1). This reflects the relatively higher ability of these species to resist the N-low conditions in this volcanic environment; these plants also show an extremely low N requirement and demonstrate more effective N use strategies than the Miyake-jima pioneer species [11,39].
To gain further insight into the ecophysiological advantages of Miyake-jima pioneer species, the pioneer species living in similar harsh habitats (e.g., sand dunes, glacier retreated sites, volcanic deserts), for instance, in Hawaii [20,41], Australia [42], New Zealand [43], and Japan [40] were compared, and we found that (1) irrespective of N availability, the photosynthesis ability (Amax) and N use ability (PNUE) of the C4 species are consistently higher than those of the C3 plants [12]. Compared to the limited number of other C4 pioneer species reported in a volcanically devastated site in Hawaii about 100 years after eruption, the Narea of M. condensatus is higher, whereas the Amax and PNUE are lower [20]. This seems to indicate the unique nitrogen acquisition conservation strategy of M. condensatus in extreme N-limited habitats; (2) F. japonica also showed relatively high level of Narea (second only to Olearia axillaris in Australian N-limited sand dunes). Compared to the other C3 pioneer herbs, the Amax and PNUE are within a normal range [20,40,42]. (3) In terms of C3 N-fixing tree species, since very few studies are comparable to our data, only one species (Coriaria arborea) reported from a New Zealand glacial retreated habitat [43] showed lower Amax and PNUE than A. sieboldiana. On the other hand, compared to the other C3 non-N-fixing pioneer trees, there were no obvious differences. To a certain extent, the above comparison proved the respective ecophysiological advantages of different pioneer species at the volcanically devastated site in Miyake-jima.

3.2. Interspecific Difference in Leaf Traits-Related Strategies among Three Pioneer Species

Leaf traits were closely associated with the growth, survival, and resource (e.g., light and nitrogen) requirements of the species. We found that within the early stage volcanically devastated habitat in Miyake-jima, three coexisting pioneer species indeed differed to a large extent in the suite of their leaf traits (Table 3). The higher photosynthetic capacity and the more efficient water and N use ability (low LMA, Narea with high Amax, PNUE, and WUE) of M. condensatus than A. sieboldiana and F. japonica (C3 photosynthetic pathway) is easily explained by the fact that C4 involves efficient CO2 concentrating mechanisms [44]. N-fixer A. sieboldiana, as we hypothesized, shows traits that are more closely associated with conservative strategy (higher Narea with relatively low Amax, PNUE and WUE) [13,26,29]) (Table 3). As for F. japonica, the higher LMA, Chl, and Fv/Fm values demonstrate its higher ability to intercept and dissipate light [45], and furthermore, it also demonstrates the highest LMA, giving it an advantage in terms of resistance to physical attack, such as strong wind and insect gnawing. Although A. sieboldiana and F. japonica have the same photosynthetic pathway, there is significant difference in the PNUE between these two species (Table 3), which was first attributed to the relatively low Narea of F. japonica. Additionally, presumably because of the fundamental differences in the leaf nutrition, this was also the case for the differences in the chemistry and structure between the N-fixing tree and the non-N-fixing herb [14,46]. All of these data indicate that these three pioneer species living in the volcanically devastated site on Miyake-jima Island have their own unique physiological advantages that they can use to adapt to the harsh volcanic environment that is present on the island. On the other hand, these three pioneer species play different roles in the development and process of the Miyake-jima volcanic ecosystem (Figure 2). This is also because of their individual ecophysiological advantages that when applied together, ensure the stability of these plants during the early stages of volcanic succession and provide better conditions for the next stage of succession.

3.3. Is There a Correlation or a Trade-Off between Growth (Amax and PNUE) and Persistence (LMA)

Leaf trait relationships (e.g., LMA and Amax, PNUE) (Figure 1) can reflect the nitrogen allocation between photosynthetic (Rubisco, light-harvesting complex) and non-photosynthetic nitrogenous compounds (cell wall structural protein) [28,46,47,48]). Numerous studies concerning leaf structure and the physiological plant responses indicated that a high LMA implied a lower PNUE and Amax [16,47]. In this study, the reduction of PNUE and Amax and the increase of LMA of M. condensatus was in line with other studies that have been conducted in nutrient-poor environments [16,49]. The M. condensatus leaves with greater LMA have a reduced PNUE because a greater ratio of the leaf N is invested in the structural proteins that comprise the cell wall. Consequently, the allocation of N for photosynthetic enzymes (e.g., Rbubisco) is reduced, resulting in a reduction of Amax [50,51,52]. In addition, greater LMA also causes a reduction in Amax through another mechanism; greater LMA involves a longer CO2 diffusion path from the stomata to the mesophyll cells and chloroplasts and hence reduces Amax [53,54]). Contrary to M. condensatus, the N-fixing species A. sieboldiana shows a different pattern, when LMA increased, the PNUE and Amax also increased, and this was consistent with a previous study by Choi et al. [39]. Similarly, Tang et al. [29] reported that N-fixing species Erythrophleum fordii had the same pattern. Therefore, it is likely that the higher leaf nitrogen content should translate into a higher photosynthetic capacity despite high LMA for N-fixing species. This is largely due to its N-fixing ability, which could provide a continuous N supply in an extremely N-limited volcanically devastated habitat. Surprisingly, for F. japonica, there was no significant effect of LMA on Amax and PNUE, which is something that has not been shown in earlier studies. This could be due to its unique N allocation pattern; F. japonica, which has neither a C4 CO2 fixing pathway nor the ability to continuously obtain N, allocate a fixed N content to the photosynthetic organs to enable a trade-off between growth and persistence.

3.4. Plant-Soil Feedback

A higher STN was found in A. sieboldiana and F. japonica than in M. condensatus (Table 1). The higher STN found A. sieboldiana might be due to its strong N fixation capacity and the maintenance of the N content stability in the leaves. However, the higher N found in and under F. japonica is more difficult to interpret. It appears that F. japonica either (1) has a greater ability to acquire N through a higher root absorption capacity, demonstrating greater root proliferation, or (2) colonizes uniquely fertile microsites that is it then able to maintain the fertility of. Consequently, these results suggest a strong correlation between the strategies that are employed for soil N and plant N, indicating a positive feedback cycle.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Site

This study was conducted at the active volcanic island, Miyake-jima, which is located in Japan (34°05′ N, 139°55′ E) and that covers an area of 55.44 km2 and has an altitude of 775.1 m in a.s.l. (Mt. Oyama). The island has a humid, temperate climate, with a mean annual temperature of 17.7 °C. The mean temperatures of the hottest and the coolest months are 26.2 °C (August) and 9.6 °C (February), respectively. The mean annual precipitation averages 2900 mm, and mean the monthly precipitation exceeds 140 mm for every month of the year [55]. The last eruption on Miyake-jima was in 2000, and this eruption destroyed a large part of the island’s ecosystem through the heavy deposition of volcanic materials including volcanic ash and through the subsequent emission of volcanic gas containing sulfur dioxide [56,57]. However, at the point of our study, there were no current effects of volcanic gas, as emissions had already ceased [55].
Based on a pre-survey in May 2016 and according to the experimental requirements, a newly created volcanically devastated site simultaneously containing three pioneer species that are typical to Miyake-jima was chosen. After the eruption in 2000, all of the original vegetation that had been previously present in the study site was completely buried by thick volcanic ash deposition. After more than 15 years of natural vegetation recovery, the vegetation coverage has significantly improved. However, at the point of our study (September 2018), the vegetation is still very sparse. The land surface is still covered with unweathered volcanic ash. The plants are completely exposed to sunlight.

4.2. Plant Materials

In our study, we selected the three pioneer species (Figure A1 in Appendix A) that were the first invade the bare land after the eruption that took place in the year 2000. For each species, 15 individuals were selected for leaf trait measurements. The height of each species was between 0.5 and 1.5 m. The distance between the chosen individuals was at least 5 m. Sampling and measurements for each species were completed during clear, rainless days in early September 2018.
M. condensatus (Figure A1B), a C4 plant belonging to Poaceae, is one of the most typical pioneer species of volcanically devastated sites and can form dense growth; this plant is distributed across coastal areas of Japan, China, Korea, and the Pacific Islands. It is also tolerant to various environmental stresses (e.g., high salinity) [58]. On Miyake-jima Island, M. condensatus is also an important pioneer species and appears to have a high tolerance to SO2 gas and acidic soils [38]. There was a notable increase in the amount of M. condensatus following the eruption in 2000, and after more than a decade of change, it is still the dominant species in most locations on the island.
A. sieboldiana (Figure A1C) is a deciduous N-fixing pioneer tree species. In the volcanically devasted sites on Miyake-jima, its fast above-ground biomass development is due to the facilitation of the effects of N-fixation. The inorganic N soil concentration was extremely high in locations where A. sieboldiana was dominant. The deposition of N from A. sieboldiana via litterfall would decrease the soil C/N ratio, which, in turn, facilitates the net soil N mineralization and consequently provides an ample supply of inorganic N to nearby plants. The N limitation on vegetation development, which is prevalent during the early stages of succession on volcanic lava flows or similar substrates elsewhere, is thus alleviated [37].
F. japonica (Figure A1D) is native to Japan, Taiwan, and Korea. It is now widely naturalized in Europe and North America and is regarded as one of the worst invasive alien species. F. japonica has been found widely in manmade and natural habitats but is often restricted to open, sunny sites. F. japonica is a perennial species of the family Polygonaceae. On Miyake-jima, F. japonica is characterized as having thick leaves. As it has developed root systems, it is able to accumulate the necessary nutrients to ensure survival in the early stages of volcanic succession [59].

4.3. Field Measurement of Leaf Traits

The photosynthetic capacity of the leaves of each species was measured using the light response curve. We measured the leaf gas exchange parameters on the newest fully expanded full-sun intact leaf using the intelligent portable photosynthesis system LCPro + (ADC BioScientific, Hoddesdon, UK). All of the measurements were performed under clear skies on sunny days in the morning between 9:00–11:00 a.m. and around solar noon at 1:00–3:00 p.m. During the measurement period, a leaf temperature of 25 °C and a CO2 concentration in the chamber of 420 μmol mol−1 were maintained. Light-response curves were determined at irradiances between 2000 and 0 µmol m−2 s−1 using a built-in LED light source in seven photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) steps and were fitted using a non-rectangular hyperbola model (Thornley 1976 [60]). The Amax, DR, and LCP were calculated using light-response curves. WUE was calculated as the ratio of Amax to the transpiration rate (E) at PPFD saturation [61].
After the measurement of the gas exchange parameters, the leaves were collected to determine the leaf area (LA), (LMA), and the Narea. The LMA (leaf dry mass/leaf area) for each individual leaf was calculated using the leaf area, as obtained by an image scanner and the leaf dry weight. To calculate leaf dry weight, the leaves were dried at 80 °C for 48 h. To calculate Narea, the dried samples were then ground to a fine powder, and the N concentration in the leaves was measured using an NC analyzer (SUMIGRAPH NC-220F). The PNUE was calculated as the Amax divided by the Narea (PNUE, μmol CO2 mol N−1 s−1 = Amax (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1)/(1/14 Narea) [50].
While measuring the gas exchange parameters, the maximum quantum yield of the photosystem II (Fv/Fm) after dark adaptation was measured using a portable Mini–PAM fluorometer (Heinz-Walz; Murchie and Lawson [62]). Prior to Fv/Fm measurement, a darkening clip was placed on the leaf for 30min to it to acclimatize to the dark. All of the measurements were performed under clear skies on sunny days in the morning between 9:00–11:00 a.m.
We estimated the Chl using a SPAD chlorophyll meter (Minolta SPAD 502 Chlorophyll Meter, Spectrum Technologies Inc., Plainfield, IL, USA), and we then used the average value to calculate the homographic model for the three pioneer species (Chl = 117.10 × SPAD/(148.84 − SPAD) [63].

4.4. Environmental Factors during Measurement

The photosynthetic characteristics are leaves are very sensitive to changes in the short-term environment factors. In this study, we recorded the environmental data of each measurement to determine the response of the leaf characteristics to environmental factors.
To assess the effect of rainfall on the leaf traits, the rainfall distribution for the week before the measurement day was analyzed. We calculated the integrated rainfall from before the photosynthetic measurements, which were taken from the daily rainfall data from the Japan Meteorological Agency [56]. We calculated the integrated rainfall within 3 days before each measurement and examined the effects of the rainfall on the leaf traits of each species.
After measuring the leaf traits, soil samples from under the measured plants were collected using 100 mL core samplers that were 5 cm in depth to determine the soil properties for each species. Three cores were sampled from the soil around the root crown (approximately 10 cm away from the root crown) and were subsequently combined and mixed. After being air-dried, the samples were passed through a 2 mm sieve, and the roots were removed. The soil total C (STC) and STN were analyzed with SUMIGRAPH NC-220F, using samples smaller than 0.05 mm.
Hemispherical photographs were taken using a Nikon Coolpix 990 and a Nikon FC-E8 Fisheye Converter (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) for every leaf physiological trait measurement. Photographs were taken above each plant. The photos were analyzed to calculate the canopy openness. The CO was defined as the fraction of open sky in the hemisphere that was visible from a point beneath the canopy and was used as an index of the light availability experienced by each individual species.

4.5. Data Analysis

All of the statistical analyses were performed in the R Environment [64]. We compared the means of each leaf trait by one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. All of the leaf traits data were log10-transformed to fit a normal distribution and to meet the parametric assumption of homogeneity of variance (using Shapiro–Wilk and Bartlett tests) (Table 3). We used a regression analysis to test the relationship between LMA with Amax, PNUE and Narea with Amax, and PNUE (Figure 1).

5. Conclusions

We conclude that pioneer species differing in N-fixing ability and photosynthetic pathways have their individual ecophysiological advantages, N trade-off patterns, and plant–environment relationships that are used by these species as a stress tolerance strategy in volcanic habitats with N limitations. The growth advantages that are associated with these ecophysiological leaf traits can be distinguished by the ecological characteristics of each species. M. condensatus shows the highest leaf photosynthesis rates. The higher rates were partially a result of higher water and nitrogen use efficiencies. The leaf nitrogen use efficiency in M. condensatus appears to be high, even for a C4 grass. A. sieboldiana relies on its N-fixing ability and has a higher Narea to compensate for its photosynthetic capacity. Regarding F. japonica, its higher LMA, Chl, Fv/Fm demonstrates its better ability to capture light. The divergence among the trait responses of the ecological characteristics of these different species that are associated with ecological strategies reflect their ability to adapt to the harsh volcanic environment. The diverse adaptation pattern among suites of traits may also promote the coexistence of species across the volcanic environment by increasing niche differentiation or by generating competitive trade-offs between species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z., H.L. and T.K.; methodology, X.Z. and T.K.; formal analysis, X.Z.; investigation, X.Z., H.L., X.H., P.Z., T.K. and M.H.; resources, M.H.; data curation, X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z. and T.K.; writing—review and editing, X.Z., T.K. and M.H.; visualization, X.Z.; funding acquisition, T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and APC were funded by KAKENHI, grant number 15H04507, 16H02932, 19H04315.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yuju Horiuchi for providing suggestions about the data analysis and Shengping Zhang for kind assistance. We would like to sincerely thank the members of the Laboratory of Silviculture and Nature Conservation, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, for their useful discussions during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. And there is no conflict of interests with China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Landscape of study site (A) and pictures of the plants Miscanthus condensatus (B), Aluns sieboldiana (C), and Fallopia japonica (D).
Figure A1. Landscape of study site (A) and pictures of the plants Miscanthus condensatus (B), Aluns sieboldiana (C), and Fallopia japonica (D).
Plants 10 02500 g0a1
Table A1. Comparison of leaf trait values (mean ± SE) among the three pioneer species (n = 15 for each species) (this study) collected from the volcanically devastated site on Miyake-jima Island with the data of same functional type leaves from the GLOPNET dataset (range and mean ± SE) (Wright et al., 2004) and the leaf traits values (mean ± SE) of other pioneer species living in similar habitat conditions. Life form, grass (G), tree (T), herb (H); N-fixing ability, yes (Y), no (N); photosynthetic pathway, C3 and C4. Traits, Narea, leaf nitrogen content per area (g·m−2); Amax, light saturated photosynthetic rate per leaf area (µmol m−2 s−1); PNUE, photosynthetic N use efficiency (µmol CO2 mol N−1·s−1). Shaded cells were used to improve the table readability.
Table A1. Comparison of leaf trait values (mean ± SE) among the three pioneer species (n = 15 for each species) (this study) collected from the volcanically devastated site on Miyake-jima Island with the data of same functional type leaves from the GLOPNET dataset (range and mean ± SE) (Wright et al., 2004) and the leaf traits values (mean ± SE) of other pioneer species living in similar habitat conditions. Life form, grass (G), tree (T), herb (H); N-fixing ability, yes (Y), no (N); photosynthetic pathway, C3 and C4. Traits, Narea, leaf nitrogen content per area (g·m−2); Amax, light saturated photosynthetic rate per leaf area (µmol m−2 s−1); PNUE, photosynthetic N use efficiency (µmol CO2 mol N−1·s−1). Shaded cells were used to improve the table readability.
Specie/Family/Plant Type/N-Fixing Ability/Photosynthetic PathwayNareaAmax PNUESiteReference
Miscanthus condensatus (Poaceae) (G) (N) (C4)1.23 ± 0.0718.48 ± 0.93221.47 ± 16.83Miyakejima IslandThis study
Fallopia japonica var. hachidyoensis (Polygonaceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.96 ± 0.0713.58 ± 0.7898.13 ± 5.10This study
Alnus sieboldiana (Betulaceae) (T) (Y) (C3)2.55 ± 0.0614.21 ± 0.7179.16 ± 4.91This study
Plant functional type
Grass C4 non-N-fixing (16)1.39 ± 0.24 20.88 ± 1.72 241.32 ± 27.15 GLOPNET datasetWright et al., 2004
0.53–3.3913.04–31.7053.87–357.10Wright et al., 2004
Herb C3 non-N-fixing (205)1.55 ± 0.05 14.71 ± 0.56 132.85 ± 5.35Wright et al., 2004
0.26–5.291.00–28.6827.70–281.41Wright et al., 2004
Tree C3 N-fixing (66)2.54 ± 0.22 13.24 ± 1.10 73.72 ± 6.51 Wright et al., 2004
0.91–5.443.67–36.60 16.33–162.427Wright et al., 2004
Pioneer species in N low habitats
Rhynchelytrum repens (Poaceae) (G) (N) (C4)0.6721.40447.16Hawaiian volcanicFunk and Vitousek 2007
Heteropogon contortus (Poaceae) (G) (N) (C4)0.7819.20344.62Funk and Vitousek 2007
Paspalum urvillei (Poaceae) (G) (N) (C4)0.7721.40389.09Funk and Vitousek 2007
Eragrostis variabilis (Poaceae) (G) (N) (C4)0.9713.60196.29Funk and Vitousek 2007
Holcus lanatus (Poaceae) (G) (N) (C3)1.098.20105.32Funk and Vitousek 2007
Deschampsia nubigena (Poaceae) (G) (N) (C3)2.2211.2070.63Funk and Vitousek 2007
Metrosideros polymorpha (Gaud.) (Myrtaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.468.8338.60Hawaiian volcanicCordell et al., 2001
Ageratina riparia (Asteraceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.2312.70144.55Hawaiian volcanicFunk and Vitousek 2007
Dubautia scabra (Asteraceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.0610.50138.68Funk and Vitousek 2007
Desmodium sandwicense (Fabaceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.916.2045.45Funk and Vitousek 2007
Sesbania tomentosa (Fabaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.129.5062.74Funk and Vitousek 2007
Pyracantha angustifolia (Rosaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.4820.70116.85Funk and Vitousek 2007
Osteomeles anthyllidifolia (Rosaceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.1913.80162.35Funk and Vitousek 2007
Psidium cattleianum (Myrtaceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.936.7048.60Funk and Vitousek 2007
Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.632.6022.33Funk and Vitousek 2007
Templetonia retusa (Vent.) R.Br. (Fabaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.9413.7067.20Australia sand duneGuilherme Pereira et al., 2019
Acacia rostellifera Benth. (Fabaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.6817.80121.80Guilherme Pereira et al., 2019
Anthocercis littorea Labill. (Solanaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.5513.90 81.20Guilherme Pereira et al., 2019
Dioscorea hastifolia Endl. (Dioscoreaceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.5411.30 103.60Guilherme Pereira et al., 2019
Myoporum insulare R.Br. (Scrophulariaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.4414.50 84.00Guilherme Pereira et al., 2019
Spyridium globulosum (Labill.) Benth. (Rhamnaceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.9817.00 120.40Guilherme Pereira et al., 2019
Aristotelia serrata (Elaeocarpaceae) (T) (N) (C3)1.5412.10 110.23New ZealandAtkin et al., 2013
Griselinia littoralis (Griseliniaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.598.8047.41Atkin et al., 2013
Hebe salicifolia (Plantaginaceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.3515.80 52.98Atkin et al., 2013
Olearia avicenniifolia (Asteraceae) (T) (N) (C3)2.2817.00 49.75Atkin et al., 2013
Coriaria arborea (Coriariaceae) (T) (Y) (C3)2.779.50 47.99Atkin et al., 2013
Conyza canadensis (Asteraceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.4717.00161.90Hawaiian volcanicFunk and Vitousek 2007
Pseudognaphalium sandwicensium (Asteraceae) (H) (N) (C3)0.978.00115.46Funk and Vitousek 2007
Hypochoeris radicata (Asteraceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.0314.50197.09Funk and Vitousek 2007
Argyroxiphium kauense (Asteraceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.669.1076.75Funk and Vitousek 2007
Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.7614.40114.55Funk and Vitousek 2007
Plantago hawaiensis (Plantaginaceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.4110.30102.27Funk and Vitousek 2007
Olearia axillaris (DC.) Benth. (Asteraceae) (H) (N) (C3)2.8713.70 70.00AustraliaGuilherme Pereira et al., 2019
Aconogonum weyrichii (Polygonaceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.2222.70159.16Japan mount FujiSakata et al., 2006
Reynoutria japonica (Polygonaceae) (H) (N) (C3)1.5818.60162.75Sakata et al., 2006

References

  1. Del Moral, R.; Grishin, S.Y. Volcanic disturbances and ecosystem recovery. Ecosyst. World 1999, 17, 137–160. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shoji, S.; Takahashi, T. Environmental and agricultural significance of volcanic ash soils. Glob. Environ. Res. 2002, 6, 113–135. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vitousek, P.M.; Porder, S.; Houlton, B.Z.; Chadwick, O.A. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: Mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tsuyuzaki, S.; del Moral, R. Species attributes in early primary succession on volcanoes. J. Veg. Sci. 1995, 6, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Westoby, M.; Falster, D.S.; Moles, A.T.; Vesk, P.A.; Wright, I.J. Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33, 125–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Voronkova, N.M.; Burkovskaya, E.V.; Bezdeleva, T.A.; Burundukova, O.L. Morphological and biological features of plants related to their adaptation to coastal habitats. Russ. J. Ecol. 2008, 39, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Violle, C.; Navas, M.L.; Vile, D.; Kazakou, E.; Fortunel, C.; Hummel, I.; Garnier, E. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 2007, 116, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tsuyuzaki, S. Species turnover and diversity during early stages of vegetation recovery on the volcano Usu, northern Japan. J. Veg. Sci. 1991, 2, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Titus, J.H.; Del Moral, R. Seedling establishment in different microsites on Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA. Plant Ecol. 1998, 134, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsuyuzaki, S.; Miyoshi, C. Effects of smoke, heat, darkness and cold stratification on seed germination of 40 species in a cool temperate zone in northern Japan. Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, X.L.; Li, H.; Hu, X.X.; Zheng, P.Y.; Hirota, M.; Kamijo, T. Photosynthetic Properties of Miscanthus condensatus at Volcanically Devastated Sites on Miyake-jima Island. Plants 2020, 9, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Taylor, S.H.; Hulme, S.P.; Rees, M.; Ripley, B.S.; Ian Woodward, F.; Osborne, C.P. Ecophysiological traits in C3 and C4 grasses: A phylogenetically controlled screening experiment. New Phytol. 2010, 185, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cornelissen, J.H.C.; Thompson, K. Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytol. 1997, 135, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kurokawa, H.; Peltzer, D.A.; Wardle, D.A. Plant traits, leaf palatability and litter decomposability for co-occurring woody species differing in invasion status and nitrogen fixation ability. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Poorter, H.; Remkes, C. Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 1990, 83, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reich, P.B.; Walters, M.B.; Ellsworth, D.S.; Uhl, C. Photosynthesis-nitrogen relations in Amazonian tree species. Oecologia 1994, 97, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reich, P.B. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: A traits manifesto. J. Ecol. 2014, 102, 275–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Simpson, K.J.; Bennett, C.; Atkinson, R.R.; Mockford, E.J.; McKenzie, S.; Freckleton, R.P.; Osborne, C.P. C4 photosynthesis and the economic spectra of leaf and root traits independently influence growth rates in grasses. J. Ecol. 2020, 108, 1899–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baruch, Z.; Goldstein, G. Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia 1999, 121, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Funk, J.L.; Vitousek, P.M. Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 2007, 446, 1079–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leishman, M.R.; Haslehurst, T.; Ares, A.; Baruch, Z. Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: Community-and global-scale comparisons. New Phytol. 2007, 176, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Daehler, C.C. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34, 183–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vitousek, P.M.; Walker, L.R.; Whiteaker, L.D.; Mueller-Dombois, D.; Matson, P.A. Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 1987, 238, 802–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hooper, D.U.; Vitousek, P.M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 1998, 68, 121–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bellingham, P.J.; Walker, L.R.; Wardle, D.A. Differential facilitation by a nitrogen-fixing shrub during primary succession influences relative performance of canopy tree species. J. Ecol. 2001, 89, 861–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Peltzer, D.A.; Bellingham, P.J.; Kurokawa, H.; Walker, L.R.; Wardle, D.A.; Yeates, G.W. Punching above their weight: Low-biomass non-native plant species alter soil properties during primary succession. Oikos 2009, 118, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Craine, J.M.; Tilman, D.; Wedin, D.; Reich, P.; Tjoelker, M.; Knops, J. Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Funct. Ecol. 2002, 16, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wright, I.J.; Reich, P.B.; Westoby, M.; Ackerly, D.D.; Baruch, Z.; Bongers, F.; Flexas, J. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 2004, 428, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tang, J.; Sun, B.; Cheng, R.; Shi, Z.; Luo, D.; Liu, S.; Centritto, M. Effects of soil nitrogen (N) deficiency on photosynthetic N-use efficiency in N-fixing and non-N-fixing tree seedlings in subtropical China. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  30. Grass Phylogeny Working Group II. New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. New Phytol. 2012, 193, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Atkinson, R.R.; Mockford, E.J.; Bennett, C.; Christin, P.A.; Spriggs, E.L.; Freckleton, R.P.; Osborne, C.P. C4 photosynthesis boosts growth by altering physiology, allocation and size. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reich, P.B.; Buschena, C.; Tjoelker, M.G.; Wrage, K.; Knops, J.; Tilman, D.; Machado, J.L. Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: A test of functional group differences. New Phytol. 2003, 157, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Brown, R.H. A difference in N use efficiency in C3 and C4 plants and its implications in adaptation and evolution 1. Crop. Sci. 1978, 18, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Craine, J.M.; Lee, W.G.; Bond, W.J.; Williams, R.J.; Johnson, L.C. Environmental constraints on a global relationship among leaf and root traits of grasses. Ecology 2005, 86, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ehleringer, J.R.; Monson, R.K. Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1993, 24, 411–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghannoum, O.; Evans, J.R.; von Caemmerer, S. Nitrogen and water use efficiency of C4 plants. In C4 Photosynthesis and Related CO2 Concentrating Mechanisms; Raghavendra, A.G., Sage, R.F., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 129–146. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kamijo, T.; Kitayama, K.; Sugawara, A.; Urushimichi, S.; Sasai, K. Primary succession of the warm-temperate broad-leaved forest on a volcanic island, Miyake-jima, Japan. Folia Geobot. 2002, 37, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kamijo, T.; Kawagoe, M.; Kato, T.; Kiyohara, Y.; Matsuda, M.; Hashiba, K.; Shimada, K. Destruction and recovery of vegetation caused by the 2000-year eruption on Miyake-jima Island, Japan. J. Disaster Res. 2008, 3, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choi, D.; Toda, H.; Kim, Y. Effect of sulfur dioxide (SO2) on growth and physiological activity in Alnus sieboldiana at Miyakejima Island in Japan. Ecol. Res. 2014, 29, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sakata, T.; Nakano, T.; Iino, T.; Yokoi, Y. Contrastive seasonal changes in ecophysiological traits of leaves of two perennial Polygonaceae herb species differing in leaf longevity and altitudinal distribution. Ecol. Res. 2006, 21, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cordell, S.; Goldstein, G.; Meinzer, F.C.; Vitousek, P.M. Regulation of leaf life-span and nutrient-use efficiency of Metrosideros polymorpha trees at two extremes of a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Oecologia 2001, 127, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guilherme Pereira, C.; Hayes, P.E.; O’Sullivan, O.S.; Weerasinghe, L.K.; Clode, P.L.; Atkin, O.K.; Lambers, H. Trait convergence in photosynthetic nutrient-use efficiency along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence in a global biodiversity hotspot. J. Ecol. 2019, 107, 2006–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Atkin, O.K.; Turnbull, M.H.; Zaragoza-Castells, J.; Fyllas, N.M.; Lloyd, J.; Meir, P.; Griffin, K.L. Light inhibition of leaf respiration as soil fertility declines along a post-glacial chronosequence in New Zealand: An analysis using the Kok method. Plant Soil 2013, 367, 163–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sage, R.F.; Christin, P.A.; Edwards, E.J. The C4 plant lineages of planet Earth. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3155–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, Q.W.; Robson, T.M.; Pieristè, M.; Oguro, M.; Oguchi, R.; Murai, Y.; Kurokawa, H. Testing trait plasticity over the range of spectral composition of sunlight in forb species differing in shade tolerance. J. Ecol. 2020, 108, 1923–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hikosaka, K. Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis–nitrogen relationship: Patterns, physiological causes, and ecological importance. J. Plant Res. 2004, 117, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Onoda, Y.; Wright, I.J.; Evans, J.R.; Hikosaka, K.; Kitajima, K.; Niinemets, Ü.; Westoby, M. Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 1447–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Mu, X.; Chen, Q.; Chen, F.; Yuan, L.; Mi, G. Within-leaf nitrogen allocation in adaptation to low nitrogen supply in maize during grain-filling stage. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ellsworth, D.S.; Reich, P.B. Photosynthesis and leaf nitrogen in five Amazonian tree species during early secondary succession. Ecology 1996, 77, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Poorter, H.; Evans, J.R. Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area. Oecologia 1998, 116, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Onoda, Y.; Hikosaka, K.; Hirose, T. Allocation of nitrogen to cell walls decreases photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency. Funct. Ecol. 2004, 18, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Takashima, T.; Hikosaka, K.; Hirose, T. Photosynthesis or persistence: Nitrogen allocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Parkhurst, D.F. Diffusion of CO2 and other gases inside leaves. New Phytol. 1994, 126, 449–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hanba, Y.T.; Miyazawa, S.I.; Terashima, I. The influence of leaf thickness on the CO2 transfer conductance and leaf stable carbon isotope ratio for some evergreen tree species in Japanese warm-temperate forests. Funct. Ecol. 1999, 13, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Japan Meteorological Agency. Temperature and Precipitation Data of Miyake-Jima in September 2019. Available online: http://www.data.jma.go.jp/ (accessed on 27 October 2019).
  56. Nakada, S.; Nagai, M.; Yasuda, A.; Shimano, T.; Geshi, N.; Ohno, M.; Fujii, T. Chronology of the Miyakejima 2000 Eruption. J. Geogr. 2001, 110, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kazahaya, K.; Hirabayashi, J.I.; Mori, H.; Odai, M.; Nakahori, Y.; Nogami, K.; Uto, K. Volcanic Gas Study of the 2000 Miyakejima Volcanic Activity. J. Geogr. 2001, 110, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hung, K.H.; Chiang, T.Y.; Chiu, C.T.; Hsu, T.W.; Ho, C.W. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from a potential biofuel plant Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae). Conserv. Genet. 2009, 10, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Adachi, N.; Terashima, I.; Takahashi, M. Nitrogen translocation via rhizome systems in monoclonal stands of Reynoutria japonica in an oligotrophic desert on Mt Fuji: Field experiments. Ecol. Res. 1996, 11, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Thornley, J.H. Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology; Academic Press (Inc.) London, Ltd: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  61. Field, C.; Merino, J.; Mooney, H. Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens. Oecologia 1983, 60, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Murchie, E.H.; Lawson, T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: A guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3983–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Coste, S.; Baraloto, C.; Leroy, C.; Marcon, É.; Renaud, A.; Richardson, A.D.; Hérault, B. Assessing foliar chlorophyll contents with the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter: A calibration test with thirteen tree species of tropical rainforest in French Guiana. Ann. For. Sci. 2010, 67, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 15 March 2018).
Figure 1. Relationships between leaf nitrogen concentration per leaf area (Narea) to light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax) (A) and photosynthetic N-use efficiency (PNUE) (B) and relationships of leaf mass per area (LMA) to Amax (C) and PNUE (D) of three pioneer species on Miyake-jima volcano Island. Symbols: M. condensatus (open circles), A. sieboldiana (black triangle), F. japonica (open rhombus). Significant regression lines: M. condensatus (black dashed) and A. sieboldiana (solid). Significance of the regression lines: ns p > 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Relationships between leaf nitrogen concentration per leaf area (Narea) to light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax) (A) and photosynthetic N-use efficiency (PNUE) (B) and relationships of leaf mass per area (LMA) to Amax (C) and PNUE (D) of three pioneer species on Miyake-jima volcano Island. Symbols: M. condensatus (open circles), A. sieboldiana (black triangle), F. japonica (open rhombus). Significant regression lines: M. condensatus (black dashed) and A. sieboldiana (solid). Significance of the regression lines: ns p > 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Plants 10 02500 g001
Figure 2. Conceptual figure of the impact of various species on ecosystem functions according to ecophysiological leaf traits.
Figure 2. Conceptual figure of the impact of various species on ecosystem functions according to ecophysiological leaf traits.
Plants 10 02500 g002
Table 1. Location and growth environment of each pioneer species in study site. Different letters indicate significant differences between the pioneer species revealed by Tukey’s post hoc test at a significance level p < 0.05 after one-way ANOVA. Abbreviations are meters above sea level (m a.s.l); canopy openness (CO) (n = 15); air temperature (AT); soil total carbon (STC) (n = 15); total soil N (STN) (n = 15).
Table 1. Location and growth environment of each pioneer species in study site. Different letters indicate significant differences between the pioneer species revealed by Tukey’s post hoc test at a significance level p < 0.05 after one-way ANOVA. Abbreviations are meters above sea level (m a.s.l); canopy openness (CO) (n = 15); air temperature (AT); soil total carbon (STC) (n = 15); total soil N (STN) (n = 15).
FactorA. sieboldianaF. japonicaM. condensatus
Location34°04.689′ N, 139°30.816′ E
Altitude (m a.s.l)500
Ash depth (cm)30–35
CO (%)80.51 ± 0.41 a80.64 ± 0.27 a80.48 ± 0.34 a
Precipitation (mm)42.23 ± 3.07 a41.05 ± 0.64 a40.72 ± 0.11 a
AT (°C)27.2326.4926.54
STC (%)0.30 ± 0.02 a0.24 ± 0.02 ab0.22 ± 0.03 b
STN (%)0.04 ± 0.0008 a0.03 ± 0.0016 a0.02 ± 0.0027 b
Table 2. List of leaf traits measured in Miyake-jima and categorized according to their function.
Table 2. List of leaf traits measured in Miyake-jima and categorized according to their function.
Trait NameAbbreviationUnits Trait Functions
Leaf areaLAcm2 Photosynthetic capacity, light interception
Leaf mass per areaLMAg m−2 Photosynthetic capacity, defense, adaption to light
Nitrogen concentration per leaf areaNareag m−2 Photosynthetic capacity, palatability, decomposability
Maximum quantum yield of Photosystem II Fv/Fm-Photosynthetic capacity, photodamage, capacity to dissipate light energy, responsiveness to light quality
Chlorophyll contentChlµg cm−2Photosynthetic capacity, light interception
Light-saturated photosynthetic rateAmaxµmol CO2 m−2 s−1Metabolic capacity
Photosynthetic N-use efficiency PNUEμmol CO2 mol N−1 s−1Balance nitrogen allocation
Transpiration rateEmmol−1 H2O m−2 s−1Water use capacity, metabolic capacity
Light compensation point LCPµmol m−2 s−1Light use capacity
Dark respiration DRµmol m−2 s−1Metabolic capacity
Water use efficiencyWUEμmol CO2 mmol−1 H2OWater use capacity
Table 3. Mean (±SE, n = 15) leaf trait values of three pioneer species in the volcanically devastated site in Miyake-jima. Data analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. All variables were log10-transformed prior to analysis. Significant differences at p < 0.05 among species are shown in different letters. Full names of leaf traits are given in Table 2.
Table 3. Mean (±SE, n = 15) leaf trait values of three pioneer species in the volcanically devastated site in Miyake-jima. Data analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. All variables were log10-transformed prior to analysis. Significant differences at p < 0.05 among species are shown in different letters. Full names of leaf traits are given in Table 2.
Leaf TraitsA. sieboldianaF. japonicaM. condensatusFdfp
LA42.30 ± 2.03 a42.49 ± 3.07 a54.13 ± 2.48 b6.5842<0.05
LMA101.33 ± 4.96 a117.59 ± 5.60 b98.99 ± 2.48 a4.3192<0.05
Narea2.55 ± 0.06 a1.96 ± 0.07 b1.23 ± 0.07 c73.682<0.001
Fv/Fm0.77 ± 0.003 a0.83 ± 0.001 b0.71 ± 0.008 c115.42<0.001
Chl40.39 ± 1.19 a49.82 ± 1.38 b25.05 ± 0.48 c171.92<0.001
Amax14.21 ± 0.71 a13.58 ± 0.78 a18.48 ± 0.93 b8.9882<0.001
PNUE79.16 ± 4.91 a98.13 ± 5.10 b221.47 ± 16.83 c68.62<0.001
E2.94 ± 0.37 a3.57 ± 0.24 a1.53 ± 0.12 b16.272<0.001
LCP34.06 ± 2.28 a29.66 ± 2.31 a35.72 ± 3.15 a0.52720.594
DR1.34 ± 0.10 a1.06 ± 0.06 b0.91 ± 0.07 c6.9412<0.01
WUE5.89 ± 0.69 a4.03 ± 0.28 b13.71 ± 1.69 c43.752<0.001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Hu, X.; Zheng, P.; Hirota, M.; Kamijo, T. Photosynthetic Properties of Co-Occurring Pioneer Species on Volcanically Devastated Sites in Miyake-jima Island, Japan. Plants 2021, 10, 2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112500

AMA Style

Zhang X, Li H, Hu X, Zheng P, Hirota M, Kamijo T. Photosynthetic Properties of Co-Occurring Pioneer Species on Volcanically Devastated Sites in Miyake-jima Island, Japan. Plants. 2021; 10(11):2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112500

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiulong, Hao Li, Xiaoxing Hu, Pengyao Zheng, Mitsuru Hirota, and Takashi Kamijo. 2021. "Photosynthetic Properties of Co-Occurring Pioneer Species on Volcanically Devastated Sites in Miyake-jima Island, Japan" Plants 10, no. 11: 2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112500

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop