Next Article in Journal
Acknowledgment to Reviewers of Journal of Developmental Biology in 2021
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins in Neurodevelopment
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Differentiation of Cells Isolated from Human Femoral Heads into Functional Osteoclasts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression and Function of Toll Pathway Components in the Early Development of the Wasp Nasonia vitripennis

1
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
3
Department of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Dev. Biol. 2022, 10(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb10010007
Submission received: 6 December 2021 / Revised: 20 January 2022 / Accepted: 22 January 2022 / Published: 26 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Journal of Developmental Biology II)

Abstract

:
The Toll signaling pathway is the main source of embryonic DV polarity in the fly Drosophila melanogaster. This pathway appears to have been co-opted from an ancestral innate immunity system within the insects and has been deployed in different ways among insect taxa. Here we report the expression and function of homologs of the important components of the D. melanogaster Toll pathway in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis. We found homologs for all the components; many components had one or more additional paralogs in the wasp relative the fly. We also found significant deviations in expression patterns of N. vitripennis homologs. Finally, we provide some preliminary functional analyses of the N. vitripennis homologs, where we find a mixture of conservation and divergence of function.

1. Introduction

The parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis, is an emerging genetic model system that has experienced much growth in both its genetic toolkit and its applications over the last decade [1,2,3,4,5]. Embryonic patterning is a topic of particular interest in N. vitripennis, as it undergoes a rapid mode of long germ embryogenesis, that is very similar in many ways to that of the well-described model system D. melanogaster, but with some derived features reflecting the independent evolutionary derivation of this mode of embryogenesis [6,7].
While the fundamental similarity of the wasp and fly early embryonic patterning output was originally observed for anterior–posterior patterning [4,7], the similarity was later found to extend to the orthogonal dorsal–ventral (DV) axis [8]. For DV patterning, it was found that the expression of markers of cell fate was highly conserved between the fly and wasp just prior to the onset of gastrulation. However, the way the patterns arise earlier in development and how the tissues behave after gastrulation were quite distinct [8,9].
Relevant here are the DV patterning processes leading up to gastrulation. In D. melanogaster the Toll signaling pathway serves to polarize the axis and to provide positional information to the ventral half of the embryo [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. It also controls the expression of several components of the BMP signaling pathway, leading to a BMP gradient emanating from the dorsal pole of the embryo that patterns the dorsal half of the embryo [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Loss of Toll signaling leads to complete loss of DV polarity, while loss of BMP has less extensive effects.
In N. vitripennis, the opposite pattern prevails. Loss of BMP signaling leads to loss of DV polarity, while loss of Toll signaling leads only to the loss of the ventral-most fates [36]. Previous examination of the BMP signaling components in N. vitripennis revealed some significant divergences from the D. melanogaster pathway [37], and the significance of these differences to the divergent function of the wasp BMP pathway are currently under investigation. Here, we present our analysis of the Toll signaling pathway in N. vitripennis and its significance for patterning the wasp embryo.
In D. melanogaster, the Toll–Dorsal Pathway is known to be activated by a complex upstream network, signaling back and forth between the follicle cells, perivitelline space, and the egg (Figure 1). This signaling network is set into motion by asymmetric localization of the nucleus within the oocyte [38,39,40]. This asymmetry leads to activation of EGF signaling in follicle cells that will define the future dorsal half of the eggshell [38,39,40,41,42]. EGF signaling represses transcription of the sulfotransferase encoding gene pipe in the dorsal region, thus restricting it to the ventral half of the egg [38,39,40,41,43,44,45]. Pipe (Pip), aided by the ER resident protein Windbeutel (Wbl) and the sulfur transporter Slalom (Sll), sulfates multiple vitelline membrane proteins, which provides an asymmetric signal to proteases acting in the perivitelline space [45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. The protease cleavage cascade of Gastrulation Defective (Gd), Snake (Snk), and Easter (Ea), facilitated by Nudel (Ndl) protease activity, ends with cleavage of the ligand Spätzle (Spz) [21]. A Spz cleavage product forms a ventral-to-dorsal gradient and can bind the Toll receptor on the embryonic plasma membrane [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. Once Spz binds to the Toll receptor, Toll internalizes and frees Pelle from an intracellular complex, including Toll, Pelle (Pll), Tube (Tub), and Myd88 [10,11,12,13,61,62,63,64,65]. Pelle can then phosphorylate Cactus (Cact), causing dissociation from Dorsal (Dl) [15,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Free Dl can then translocate to the nucleus, where it acts as a transcription factor, activating and repressing hundreds of downstream targets responsible for establishing cell fate identities in the embryo [16,18,19,20,22,23,72,73,74].
The goal of this work is to identify and initially characterize the components of the N. vitripennis Toll signaling pathway in detail in order to fill in our gaps of knowledge and, together with previous work, provide a more complete picture of the mechanism of this dynamic DV patterning system in the wasp. A candidate gene approach was used to find wasp orthologs to all known fly components and compare their expression through in situ hybridization. In addition, preliminary functional studies were conducted in N. vitripennis on major pathway components in order to elucidate the inner working of the pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Discovery of Toll Pathway Orthologs

Protein sequences of Drosophila melanogaster Toll Pathway components were obtained from the NCBI “Protein” database. Potential N. vitripennis orthologs were obtained by submitting the corresponding D. melanogaster sequence into the query of the “blastp suite” of the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [75]. Search settings were limited by “Database” (non-redundant protein sequences (nr)) and “Organism” (Nasonia vitripennis (taxid:7425)). “BLAST Results” were analyzed by reciprocal BLASTing the top hit under the “Sequences producing significant alignments” header.
The sequence of the top hit was entered into a new “blastp suite” query and BLASTed against the D. melanogaster database (“Organism”: Drosophila melanogaster (taxid:7227)). If the original D. melanogaster sequence entered was the top hit of this second BLAST, then the N. vitripennis sequence found was considered an ortholog.
Since there is always the possibility of lineage-specific duplications, we repeated the reciprocal blast with the next best hit, until the N. vitripennis gene returned a D. melanogaster sequence other than the original query. All N. vitripennis sequences that returned the original query (or its known paralog, if any) were also saved and were considered potential orthologs. These potential candidates were then examined using PCR, RNAi, and in situ hybridization. Primers used to amplify fragments of each gene are given in Supplementary File S1.
Subsequently, we performed BLAST while including the beetle Tribolium castaneum and the bee Apis melifera and collected sequences from these four species that corresponded to the original reciprocal BLAST hits and, if present, the next most closely related D. melanogaster gene. These sets of sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega [76]. The resulting alignments were used for phylogenetic analysis with RAxML and support was estimated with 100 bootstrap replicates [77]. Command line used form: raxmlHPC-PTHREADS -T 4 -f a -x 127,745 -p 453,125 -# 100 -m PROTCATDAYHOFF -s ClustalAlignmentInputGeneX -n OutputGeneX.
Trees were edited using FigTree (v1.4.4) (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 2 December 2021), and are presented in Supplementary File S2. Some of these analyses identified additional potential orthologs, as the phylogenetic clustering did not necessarily agree with reciprocal BLAST results. These additional candidates will be the subject of future analyses. Sequences that had only one BLAST result per species (Windbeutel, Myd88, Tube, and Bcl3) were not subjected to phylogenetic analysis.

2.2. In Situ Hybridization

Ovarioles and embryos were collected, dissected, and processed from wildtype, AsymCX, wasps using standard protocols [8,43].
Probe production and in situ hybridization were performed using standard protocols on ovarioles and embryos in order to characterize normal expression patterns of each transcript of interest during oogenesis and embryogenesis [8,9]. Samples were imaged at 20× magnification on a widefield, compound epi-fluorescent microscope (AXIO IMAGER M2, Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

2.3. Parental RNA Interference (pRNAi)

Yellow AsymCx pupae were injected with dsRNA (~1μg/mL in water) designed against each of the transcripts of interest (e.g., Nv-tollA, Nv-dl1, Nv-dl2, Nv-dl3, Nv-dl4, Nv-spz1) using standard protocols [78]. Injected pupae were allowed to eclose. Adult RNAi wasps were provided honey water for one day post eclosure and allowed to lay eggs. Wasps were reared individually, in isolated, solitary egg laying chambers [78] or socially in large communal egg laying chambers [37]. Fresh hosts were provided daily. Laid eggs were screened (see below) for quantity (clutch size) and viability (embryonic lethality or malformations).

2.4. Qualitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

RNA was isolated from 0–4 h (28 °C) knockdown embryos using standard TRIzol-based protocols (Ambion 15596018) and converted into cDNA using the Protoscript First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (NEB 63001), controlling for total RNA input. For each condition, multiple batches of wasps were injected. Embryos were pooled together from multiple egg lays within an injection batch, but not between different batches (biological replicates). Additionally, two cDNA technical replicates were synthesized per biological replicate. Embryos from mock, water-injected embryos were collected and prepared in a similar manner.
To assess knockdown, qPCR was performed on both knockdown and mock-treated embryos. Standard PCR reactions were assembled using the PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems: A25742). For each sample, reactions were performed using primers specific to the transcript of interest (Nv-dl1, Nv-dl2, Nv-dl3, Nv-dl4) and primers specific to a housekeeping gene (Nv-rp49). Reactions were performed in triplicate using standard parameters: (50 °C for 2′, 95 °C for 2′, 40 cycles of (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s, plate read, 72 °C for 60 s, plate read), 95 °C for 2′, gradient 60 °C→95 °C (0.2 °C for 1 s). Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary File S1.
Technical replicates (triplicates from both cDNA replicates) for each sample and primer set combination were combined to calculate an average CT value. Delta-Delta CT values were calculated for each knockdown condition and expressed as a relative expression (percentage of wildtype expression) after normalizing to rp49 levels.

2.5. Embryonic Lethality Screening

Overnight egg lays from RNAi wasps were collected and plated onto 1% PBS agar plates. Clutch sizes, the number of embryos laid by an individual wasp in a 24 h period, were recorded. Embryos were then screened for embryonic lethality and developmental malformations after being allowed to develop for 24 h at 28 °C (as described in [79]). Mock, water-injected embryos were also collected, plated, and screened as a control.

3. Results

3.1. Lack of Expression of Eggshell-Modifying Component Homologs

Since the components and function of the EGF pathway in establishing polarity of the N. vitripennis DV axis has already been described, we started our analysis with the homologs of the genes downstream of EGF that transmit the signal from the follicle cells to the protease cascade through sulfation of vitelline membrane components [51]. Single orthologs were found for the crucial factors Wbl, Sll, and Pip using reciprocal BLAST and phylogenetic analysis for Sll and Pip (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2; only a single potential Wbl homolog was found). None of these had detectable expression patterns or levels in N. vitripennis ovaries (Figure 2 [80]), in contrast to D. melanogaster, where pip is expressed strongly in ventral follicle cells and wbl and sll are expressed throughout the epithelium. Similar to the fly, all three factors lacked detectable expression in the wasp embryo (data not shown). The absence of detectable expression of all three of these specialized components is consistent with our observation that Nv-pipe knockdown does not affect DV patterning (not shown). This is also consistent with the lack of pipe homolog expression in the follicle cells of the honeybee [81]. Since Pipe has been shown to function in hemimetabolous insect DV patterning [80], it appears that a role for Pipe in DV patterning may have been lost early in hymenopteran evolution.

3.2. Novel Paralogs and Expression Patterns of Protease Cascade Components

The components within the perivitelline space are important for activating the Toll signaling pathway on the ventral half of the embryo. Signals from the follicle cells activate a cascade of sequential protein cleavages, leading to the cleavage and activation of the Toll ligand Spätzle. Homologous proteins for all six components (nudel, gastrulation defective, snake, easter, serpin 27A, spätzle) were identified in N. vitripennis. In situ hybridization compared the expression of these homologs in the ovarioles and embryos of D. melanogaster and N. vitripennis.

3.3. Nudel

Nudel (Ndl) is exclusively expressed in D. melanogaster follicle cells in late oogenesis in the ovary. Initially, we found a single ortholog of Ndl in the N. vitripennis genome, based on reciprocal BLAST results. However, a more recent search found an additional sequence (XP_031786376) that also BLASTs back to fly Nudel and clusters with it in phylogenetic analysis (Figure S3). This additional potential paralog will be investigated in future analyses. We termed the originally discovered ortholog (XP_003424379) Nv-ndl. Like its D. melanogaster ortholog [53,54], Nv-ndl is expressed in the follicle cells surrounding the oocyte in late oogenesis, but not in the nurse cells or in the embryo (Figure 3A), consistent with a previous report and the conserved expression of Nudel throughout insects [80].

3.4. Gastrulation Defective

Gastrulation defective (Gd) is the most upstream component of the cytoplasmic protease cascade that leads to cleavage of Spz. Dm-gd is expressed in the oocyte, the surrounding follicle cells, and later on in the embryo [55]. Two paralogs of Dm-gd were found in N. vitripennis based on reciprocal BLAST results and phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure S4, which also suggests that CG9649 is paralogous to gd in the fly). Nv-gd1 is expressed throughout the oocyte and follicle cells early on (Figure 3B). In mid and late egg chambers, mRNA expression is restricted to a single side of the follicle epithelium (Figure 3C). Nv-gd1 is not expressed in the embryo. Nv-gd2 is neither expressed in the oocyte nor the follicle cells (not shown), but is expressed ubiquitously at low levels in the early embryo and then at higher levels in the yolk of the syncytial blastoderm (Figure 4A,B). Thus, together the two N. vitripennis paralogs recapitulate the full expression of D. melanogaster gd.

3.5. Snake

D. melanogaster snk is expressed in the oocyte, and its protein is secreted into the perivitelline space and acts upstream of Easter [21]. Reciprocal BLAST results supported the protein XP_008207491.1 as the most likely N. vitripennis ortholog of Snake (hereafter referred to as Nv-snk). However, Nv-Snk is more similar to the N. vitripennis protein XP_031786740.1 than it is to any D. melanogaster sequence, suggesting that the two genes in N. vitripennis split from an ancestral Nv-snk. Contrary to this, XP_031786740.1 is a reciprocal best BLAST hit with the relatively unknown D. melanogaster proteins encoded by the genes CG11841 and CG11842, indicating a set of two ancestral snk-like lineages, and we provisionally refer to the gene encoding XP_031786740.1 as Nv-snk2. Nv-snk and Nv-snk2 are barely detectable in the ovaries (not shown) and only Nv-snk shows weak expression in the early embryo (Figure 4C). Phylogenetic analysis of genes with similarity to Snake suggests several other candidates that might be part of the Snake lineage and which could play a role in the N. vitripennis system (Supplementary Figure S5).

3.6. Easter

Easter (Ea) is the protease that cleaves Spätzle, producing the active Toll ligand [82]. Melanization protease 1 (MP1) and the Spätzle processing enzyme (Spe) are the top BLAST hits of Ea, and are likely paralogs in D. melanogaster (Supplementary Figure S6), but only Ea has been shown to act in the DV patterning pathway [21]. We found two proteins that are reciprocal best hits to Ea, MP1, and Spe in the N. vitripennis genome. We named them Nv-ea1 and Nv-ea2, and they are examined here. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a very complex set of relationships, and additional potential paralogs of easter may be present (Supplementary Figure S6). Nv-ea1 is expressed strongly throughout the oocyte and the posterior region of the nurse cells (Figure 3D) and is only weakly detected in the embryo (not shown). Nv-ea2 was at very low or undetectable levels in both the ovary and embryo (not shown).

3.7. Serpin27A

Serpin27A (Spn27A) is an important regulator of the protease cascade and controls its activity over time [21]. A single ortholog was found in N. vitripennis (Nv-spn27A) via BLAST and phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure S7). Nv-spn27A is not expressed in the ovarioles (not shown), but is expressed in a dynamic pattern in the embryo (Figure 4D–H). mRNA is first localized in a short, narrow stripe at the dorsal midline, near the anterior pole of the embryo (Figure 4D). This expression domain then expands to the posterior pole, retracts back from the posterior pole, and then widens laterally (Figure 4E–G). This lateral expansion increases during gastrulation until it is expressed in the entire presumptive serosa (Figure 4H). This expression pattern is quite different from what is seen in the fly. Dm-spn27A is expressed in the oocyte and the early embryo. However, expression remains constant and ubiquitous through the cellular blastoderm stage.

3.8. Spätzle

Spätzle is the target of the protease cascade and sets up the gradient of Toll pathway activation and is secreted from the oocyte [83]. We identified two potential paralogs of Spz in the N. vitripennis genome with reciprocal BLAST and support from phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure S8), indicating a duplication in the wasp lineage. Nv-spz1 is expressed in the ovarioles in a similar pattern to that of Nv-ea1, throughout the oocyte and localized to the posterior of the nurse cells (Figure 3E). Expression is also similarly lacking in the follicle cells and the embryo (not shown). Nv-spz2 is not expressed in any portion of the ovarioles (not shown), but is expressed in the embryo. Expression is ubiquitous throughout the embryo, but elevated along the dorsal midline (Figure 4I). Elevated expression then expands to a broad lateral domain encircling the entire trunk of the embryo in later blastoderm stages (Figure 4J). This late and dynamic expression seen in Nv-spz2 has not been described in D. melanogaster.

3.9. Toll Receptors

In D. melanogaster, the Toll receptor receives positional information from the follicle cells and perivitelline space through its ligand Spätzle. Toll is then responsible for activating the signaling cascade that will fully polarize the embryo.
There is a single ortholog of the Toll receptor responsible for activating Dorsal in embryonic patterning and immunity. In contrast, we found four Toll paralogs in the N. vitripennis genome that reciprocally BLAST to fly Toll and which are direct orthologs of Dm-Toll, based on phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure S9), distinct from the larger family of Toll-like receptors found among insects [84,85,86]). Three of these (Nv-TollA, C, D) are expressed in both the oocyte and embryo; however, the details of their expression vary. Nv-TollA is expressed in the posterior nurse cells and throughout the oocyte, with strong posterior enrichment and localization (Figure 5A). Nv-TollC is expressed more strongly in the nurse cells and highly enriched in the most posterior ones, and the mRNA is highly enriched at both the anterior and posterior poles of the oocyte (Figure 5B). Nv-TollD is more ubiquitously expressed throughout the nurse cells and accumulates throughout the oocyte (as opposed to the localization at the poles in Nv-TollA and C) (Figure 5C).
In the early blastoderm embryo, Nv-TollA is ubiquitously expressed at low levels, with higher levels of expression in both the anterior and posterior polar regions (Figure 5D). Later, expression becomes tightly restricted to the two poles and then starts to form a very thin stripe along the ventral midline (Figure 5E). Nv-TollC is initially expressed at the anterior and posterior poles of the early N. vitripennis blastoderm and also shows a narrow ventral midline stripe early on (Figure 5F), similar to Nv-TollA. This stripe quickly evolves to a domain that outlines the borders of the presumptive mesoderm (Figure 5G). Once gastrulation begins, expression is strong throughout the entire presumptive mesoderm (Figure 5H). Nv-TollD is expressed ubiquitously at low levels in the embryo (Figure 5I). Nv-TollB is neither expressed during oogenesis nor embryogenesis.
This asymmetric localization of Nv-Toll mRNAs in both the ovary and embryo is unexpected. Dm-Toll is also maternally expressed in the oocyte and embryo, but it is ubiquitously expressed through the blastoderm stages similar to the expression of NvTollD [87,88,89,90]. It is not until gastrulation that zygotic Toll starts to be differentially expressed [87,88,89,90].

3.10. Membrane-Interacting Mediators of Toll Signaling

Several components interact with the membrane-bound activated Toll receptor and transmit the signal into the cell. D. melanogaster myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (Myd88) is required to localize Tube to the membrane upon Toll activation. In turn, Tube binds to Pelle, which leads to Pelle phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of Pelle leads to phosphorylation of Cactus, and the translocation of Dorsal to the nucleus [11,71]. Single orthologs were detected in N. vitripennis for Tube and Myd88 with reciprocal BLAST, and two paralogs were confirmed for N. vitripennis Pelle (Nv-Pll) (Supplementary Figure S10). N. vitripennis tube (Nv-tub) is expressed in both ovaries and the early embryo (Figure 6A,B). The two Nv-pll paralogs, as well as Nv-Myd88, are not detected by in situ hybridization in the ovary (not shown), but are expressed at low levels in the early embryo (Figure 6C–E).

3.11. Dorsal Inhibitors

In D. melanogaster, Cactus binding prevents Dorsal from translocating to the nucleus. Toll signaling leads to Cactus phosphorylation and degradation, freeing Dorsal. While a single cactus gene performs this function in the fly, three genes orthologous to Cactus (Nv-cact1, 2, and 3) were found in the N. vitripennis genome by reciprocal BLAST and phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure S11).
All three Nv-cact paralogs are expressed in the nurse cells and oocyte, with slightly different patterns in the nurse cells for each (Figure 7A–C). Nv-cact1 is also expressed in the follicle cells (Figure 7A). In addition to the ubiquitous maternal contribution, Nv-cact1 and Nv-cact2 have patterned zygotic expression in the embryo. Nv-cact1 is strongly expressed along the ventral midline (Figure 7D). This narrow stripe persists from the early blastoderm until the onset of gastrulation (Figure 7E). Nv-cact2 is ubiquitously expressed in the early embryo (Figure 7F). Later blastoderm stages have slightly elevated expression along the ventral midline, similar to, but slightly weaker than, what is seen in Nv-cact1 (Figure 7G). These patterns may indicate feedback control of Nv-cact1 and 2 by the Toll signaling pathway, as seen in other insects [91,92]. Nv-cact3 is not expressed in the embryo.
We also found an additional potential Dorsal inhibiting factor in the N. vitripennis genome. It appears to be most closely related to the B-cell lymphoma-3 (Bcl3) genes in vertebrates, which are distantly related to the IκB factors, like Cactus, and perform similar roles in controlling NfκB nuclear translocation [93]. We also found homologs of Bcl3 in other insects, including the bee Apis meliferra and the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Nv-bcl3 is expressed in the nurse cells, strongly but ubiquitously in the oocyte, but not in the follicle cells (Figure 8A). In the embryo, Nv-bcl3 is expressed dynamically in a weakly periodic fashion along the AP axis, with broad, alternating regions of high and low expression that become more stripe-like over time (Figure 8B,C). After gastrulation, Nv-bcl3 is expressed in scattered cells across the ectoderm (Figure 8D).

3.12. Duplications in Dorsal

Dorsal nuclear translocation is the functional output of Toll signaling. In the fly, a single dorsal gene, expressed maternally, performs the patterning function. In N. vitripennis, we found four paralogous genes related to dorsal (Nv-dl1-4) (Supplementary Figure S12).
All four N. vitripennis dorsal transcripts are expressed maternally in the germline cells (Figure 9A–D). Nv-dl1 shows uniform expression in the nurse cells and oocyte (Figure 9A), while Nv-dl2 appears to be present in a posterior-to-anterior gradient in the nurse cells (Figure 9B). Nv-dl3 and Nv-dl4 show strong concentration in the posterior nurse cells adjacent to the oocyte (Figure 9C,D). These differences indicate distinct modes of regulation of these paralogs in the germline, the functional significance of which is at present unclear. All four paralogs are expressed uniformly at the blastoderm stage (with very low levels seen in Nv-dl3) and show no patterned expression (Figure 9E–H).

3.13. Functional Analysis of Pathway Components

Functional Analysis of Nv-Dorsal Paralogs

While four Nv-Toll paralogs were found, it has already been shown that the knockdown of Nv-TollA by pRNAi results in the dorsalization of the embryo and high levels of embryonic lethality [36]. However, knocking down Nv-TollB, C, or D in a similar way did not result in these or any other observable developmental phenotype.
In order to similarly determine which of the four Nv-Dorsal paralogs is functionally equivalent to Dm-Dl, each paralog was also knocked down by pRNAi and screened for phenotypes. In D. melanogaster, Toll and Dorsal mutants both cause a similar dorsalizing phenotype, therefore it is predicted that the functional N. vitripennis paralog would cause similar phenotypes, as seen in the Nv-Toll knockdowns [21]. Following pRNAi, none of the predicted phenotypes were observed for any of the four paralogs. The average embryonic lethality observed for each paralog was under 15% and in situ hybridization revealed no clear disruption of DV patterning (not shown). Quantitative PCR confirmed that the lack of observed phenotypes was not due to a failure in knockdown, as transcript levels were reduced to below 30% of wildtype levels in multiple clutches and for each paralog (Figure 10). While both degree of knockdown and frequency of lethality were variable, there was no clear correlation between the two (i.e., strong knockdowns did not show higher embryonic lethality, and weaker knockdowns still showed lethality well above control levels). These results cannot differentiate between incomplete knockdown and redundant function among the paralogs as the explanation for the lack of significant phenotypes when knocking down Nv-dl paralogs. Stronger loss of function disruptions (e.g., CRISPR-induced frameshifts) and multi-target approaches will be necessary to determine which Dorsal paralogs function in N. vitripennis embryonic patterning.

3.14. Functional Analysis of Other DV Patterning Components

Previous work has demonstrated that the reduction of EGF signaling by pRNAi leads to a ventralized, partially duplicated axis phenotype in N. vitrpennis embryos [43]. In D. melanogaster a similar, but stronger, effect is mediated by expansion of the pipe expression domain [45], allowing unrestrained cleavage of spz [94]. Given the lack of detectable, patterned expression of Nv-pipe, it seemed unlikely that Nv-pipe would play a role in mediating the EGF signal. Indeed, neither Nv-pipe nor Nv-wbl pRNAi led to patterning defects or reduced viability in embryos, further indicating that this part of the pathway has been deleted in N. vitrpennis.
Preliminary analysis of the protease cascade has not resulted in clear results for the functional conservation of this part of the pathway. No phenotypes were recovered in preliminary pRNAis against Nv-gd1, Nv-gd2, Nv-snk1, Nv-ea1, or Nv-ea2 (not shown). We believe that this is the result of the combination of incomplete knockdown and possible redundant functionality of paralogs for all of these proteases. Nv-ndl was the exception in giving an embryonic lethal phenotype, but the knockdown resulted in defective eggshells, and no embryonic material could be obtained to determine whether patterning was disrupted.
Downstream of the protease cascade, at least one of the Nv-spz paralogs, Nv-spz1, is required for DV patterning, and phenotypes similar to weak Nv-TollA knockdowns were obtained with Nv-spz1 pRNAi (Figure 11). Only the previously published Nv-TollA gave dorsalizing phenotypes, indicating that it is the primary receptor mediating Nv-Spz1 signaling to the embryo. The potential role of the presumed membrane-associated mediators of Nv-Toll signaling, Nv-myd88, -pll1, -tub, were also investigated. Their role in DV patterning could not be assessed, as the injected wasps were all sickly, with short life-spans, and did not lay eggs. This is likely due to the crucial roles of these genes in innate immunity. The knockdown of Nv-pll2 did not result in sterile wasps. The embryos laid by these wasps did not hatch and had larval deformities commonly seen in other dorsalizing knockdown phenotypes (not shown). Misexpression of downstream DV genes following RNAi still needs to be investigated to confirm this defect in polarity. Finally, pRNAi against the Nv-cact paralogs and Nv-bcl3 resulted in normal embryos, and no DV patterning defects were detected (not shown). Again, we believe this is likely due to incomplete knockdowns and redundancy among paralogs. A summary of these experiments is presented in Table 1.

4. Discussion

Here we have shown that orthologs of all known components of the Toll signaling pathway are present and well conserved in the wasp N. vitrpennis. For most of the fly Toll pathway genes, at least one N. vitripennis ortholog is expressed in a pattern consistent with having a conserved function. Unfortunately, we could not confirm the presence of conserved function for many of the identified components in this preliminary analysis. More focused and intensive functional testing will be required to confidently ascribe or eliminate potential functions for many of these factors.
An exception to the general rule of conserved expression is the cassette of proteins needed for sulfation of the vitelline membrane: Sll, Wbl, and Pipe. While present in the genome, none of these are expressed in the ovary of N. vitrpennis, and do not give phenotypes. Based on the recent discovery of a Drosophila-like function of Pipe in the cricket [80], it appears that this pathway has been deleted from the DV patterning hierarchy in the N. vitrpennis lineage. The absence of pipe expression in the follicle cells in the honeybee indicates that the loss likely happened early in hymenopteran evolution [81]. Interestingly, a recent investigation of vitelline membrane proteins in N. vitrpennis [95] found that their knockdown leads to phenotypes at the cuticular level quite similar to those where the DV axis is disrupted ([43,96], J.A.L., personal observations). This indicates that vitelline membrane components still play a role in establishing DV polarity, but the mechanism and potentially the effect may be different.
We also observed large scale gene duplication resulting in multiple paralogs of several components of the system, most notably four Toll paralogs, four dorsal paralogs, and three cactus paralogs. The functional relevance of so many paralogs is so far not clear. It is not a general feature of N. vitrpennis signaling pathways, as the wasp BMP pathway exhibited very few lineage-specific paralogs [37]. Are these duplication events adding robustness and protection to vital portions of the pathway, potentially through subfunctionalization or specialization of the various paralogs? Or are they paired with modified/diversified expression pattern domains because they are evolving to meet some species-specific function or need? In depth analysis and more robust gene disruption techniques will be needed to answer these questions.
Perhaps the biggest unanswered question is: how is the EGF signal from the oocyte to the follicle cells transmitted to the embryo? We have shown that EGF-mediated asymmetry signals are conserved and required to polarize the embryo. Here we have also shown that Spz1 is likely the ligand primarily responsible for embryonic Toll activation. So far, however, how the EGF polarity information is converted into localized production of active Spz is unknown. We do know that Nv-Pip is not involved. Have novel proteins been coopted into the pathway to fill Nv-Pip’s void? Or is a completely new mechanism in place to relay the EGF signal from the follicle cells to the oocyte? The expression of Nv-gd1 in a subset of follicle cells is potentially significant, since fly Gd protein becomes enriched at the ventral side of the eggshell in a Pipe-dependent manner, and thus plays a crucial role in polarizing the protease cascade and producing ventral cleavage of Spz [97]. If Nv-Gd1 protein localization reflects its mRNA, this could provide a method to polarize the embryo in the absence of Nv-Pip function. While preliminarily Nv-gd1 knockdown gave no phenotype, future studies could employ more complete knock-out approaches, such as CRISPR, to test this idea more conclusively.
In general, it is clear that new approaches are needed to rigorously test the function of Toll signaling components in N. vitripennis, which will then allow more meaningful comparisons with other insect species with the goal of understanding the evolutionary significance of this ancient pathway in the diversity of insects.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jdb10010007/s1, Supplementary File S1: Table S1: Primers used in this study. Supplementary File S2: Figures S1–S12: Phylogenetic trees of candidate genes analyzed in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.P., T.B., O.Ö., S.R., J.A.L.; investigation, D.P., T.B., O.Ö., J.A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P., T.B., O.Ö., S.R., J.A.L.; writing—review and editing, D.P., S.R., J.A.L.; supervision, J.A.L., S.R.; funding acquisition, S.R., J.A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: SFB 680; National Institutes of Health: R01GM129153.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Werren, J.H.; Richards, S.; Desjardins, C.A.; Niehuis, O.; Gadau, J.; Colbourne, J.K. Functional and evolutionary insights from the genomes of three parasitoid Nasonia species. Science 2010, 327, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rago, A.; Gilbert, D.G.; Choi, J.H.; Sackton, T.B.; Wang, X.; Kelkar, Y.D.; Werren, J.H.; Colbourne, J.K. OGS2: Genome re-annotation of the jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Werren, J.H.; Loehlin, D.W. The Parasitoid Wasp Nasonia: An Emerging Model System with Haploid Male Genetics. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, 2009, pdb-emo134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lynch, J.A.; Brent, A.E.; Leaf, D.S.; Pultz, M.A.; Desplan, C. Localized maternal orthodenticle patterns anterior and posterior in the long germ wasp Nasonia. Nature 2006, 439, 728–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lynch, J.A. The Expanding Genetic Toolbox of the Wasp Nasonia vitripennis and Its Relatives. Genetics 2015, 199, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Pultz, M.A.; Leaf, D.S. The jewel wasp Nasonia: Querying the genome with haplo-diploid genetics. Genesis 2003, 35, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pultz, A.M.; Pitt, J.N.; Alto, N.M. Extensive zygotic control of the anteroposterior axis in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Development 1999, 126, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Buchta, T.; Ozuak, O.; Stappert, D.; Roth, S.; Lynch, J.A. Patterning the dorsal–ventral axis of the wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Dev. Biol. 2013, 381, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pers, D.; Buchta, T.; Özüak, O.; Wolff, S.; Pietsch, J.M.; Memon, M.B.; Roth, S.; Lynch, J.A. Global analysis of dorsoventral patterning in the wasp Nasonia reveals extensive incorporation of novelty in a regulatory network. BMC Biol. 2016, 14, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lynch, J.A.; Roth, S. The evolution of dorsal-ventral patterning mechanisms in insects. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Moussian, B.; Roth, S. Dorsoventral Axis Formation in the Drosophila Embryo—Shaping and Transducing a Morphogen Gradient. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, R887–R899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Anderson, V.K.; Bokla, L.; Nusslein-Volhard, C. Establishment of Dorsal-Ventral Polarity in the Drosophila Embryo-the Induction of Polarity by the Toll Gene-Product. Cell 1985, 42, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anderson, V.K.; Jurgens, G.; Nusslein-Volhard, C. Establishment of Dorsal-Ventral Polarity in the Drosophila Embryo-Genetic-Studies on the Role of the Toll Gene-Product. Cell 1985, 42, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Belvin, M.P.; Anderson, K.V. A conserved signaling pathway: The Drosophila Toll-Dorsal Pathway. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1996, 12, 393–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bergmann, A.; Stein, D.; Geisler, R.; Hagenmaier, S.; Schmid, B.; Fernandez, N.; Schnell, B.; Nusslein-Volhard, C. A gradient of cytoplasmic Cactus degradation establishes the nuclear localization gradient of the dorsal morphogen in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 1996, 60, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hong, J.W.; Hendrix, D.A.; Papatsenko, D.; Levine, M.S. How the Dorsal gradient works: Insights from postgenome technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20072–20076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Steward, R. Dorsal, an Embryonic Polarity Gene in Drosophila, Is Homologous to the Vertebrate Proto-Oncogene, c- rel. Science 1987, 238, 692–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roth, S.; Stein, D.; Nüsslein-Volhard, C. A gradient of nuclear localization of the dorsal protein determines dorsoventral pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 1989, 59, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stathopoulos, A.; Levine, M. Dorsal Gradient Networks in the Drosophila Embryo. Dev. Biol. 2002, 246, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Stathopoulos, A.; Van Drenth, M.; Erives, A.; Markstein, M.; Levine, M. Whole-Genome Analysis of Dorsal-Ventral Patterning in the Drosophila Embryo. Cell 2002, 111, 687–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Stein, D.S.; Stevens, L.M. Maternal control of the Drosophila dorsal-ventral body axis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2014, 3, 301–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Reeves, T.G.; Stathopoulos, A. Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila Embryo. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a000836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Rusch, J.; Levine, M. Threshold responses to the dorsal regulatory gradient and the subdivision of primary tissue territories in the Drosophila embryo. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1996, 6, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sandmann, T.; Girardot, C.; Brehme, M.; Tongprasit, W.; Stolc, V.; Furlong, E.E. A core transcriptional network for early mesoderm development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. O’Connor, M.B.; Umulis, D.; Othmer, H.G.; Blair, S.S. Shaping BMP morphogen gradients in the Drosophila embryo and pupal wing. Development 2006, 133, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Leptin, M. twist and snail as positive and negative regulators during Drosophila mesoderm development. Genes Dev. 1991, 5, 1568–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jazwinska, A.; Rushlow, C.; Roth, S. The role of brinker in mediating the graded response to Dpp in early Drosophila embryos. Development 1999, 126, 3323–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wharton, A.; Ray, R.P.; Gelbart, W.M. An Activity Gradient of Decapentaplegic Is Necessary for the Specification of Dorsal Pattern Elements in the Drosophila Embryo. Development 1993, 117, 807–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Irish, V.F.; Gelbart, W.M. The Decapentaplegic Gene Is Required for Dorsal Ventral Patterning of the Drosophila Embryo. Genes Dev. 1987, 1, 868–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Shimmi, O.; Umulis, D.; Othmer, H.; O’Connor, M.B. Facilitated transport of a Dpp/Scw heterodimer by Sog/Tsg leads to robust patterning of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Cell 2005, 120, 873–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Srinivasan, S.; Rashka, K.E.; Bier, E. Creation of a Sog morphogen gradient in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Cell 2002, 2, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ashe, L.H.; Levine, M. Local inhibition and long-range enhancement of Dpp signal transduction by Sog. Nature 1999, 398, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Biehs, B.; Francois, V.; Bier, E. The Drosophila short gastrulation gene prevents Dpp from autoactivating and suppressing neurogenesis in the neuroectoderm. Genes Dev. 1996, 10, 2922–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Marques, G.; Musacchio, M.; Shimell, M.J.; WunnenbergStapleton, K.; Cho, K.W.Y.; OConnor, M.B. Production of a DPP activity gradient in the early Drosophila embryo through the opposing actions of the SOG and TLD proteins. Cell 1997, 91, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Shimell, M.J.; Ferguson, E.L.; Childs, S.R.; Oconnor, M.B. The Drosophila Dorsal-Ventral Patterning Gene Tolloid Is Related to Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1. Cell 1991, 67, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ozuak, O.; Buchta, T.; Roth, S.; Lynch, J.A. Dorsoventral polarity of the Nasonia embryo primarily relies on a BMP gradient formed without input from Toll. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 2393–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ozuak, O.; Buchta, T.; Roth, S.; Lynch, J.A. Ancient and diverged TGF-beta signaling components in Nasonia vitripennis. Dev. Genes Evol. 2014, 224, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Neumansilberberg, S.F.; Schupbach, T. The Drosophila Dorsoventral Patterning Gene Gurken Produces a Dorsally Localized Rna and Encodes a Tgf-Alpha-Like Protein. Cell 1993, 75, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Neumansilberberg, S.F.; Schupbach, T. Dorsoventral Axis Formation in Drosophila Depends on the Correct Dosage of the Gene Gurken. Development 1994, 120, 2457–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roth, S. The origin of dorsoventral polarity in Drosophila. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 2003, 358, 1317–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Roth, S.; Schupbach, T. The Relationship between Ovarian and Embryonic Dorsoventral Patterning in Drosophila. Development 1994, 120, 2245–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gonzalezreyes, A.; Elliott, H.; Stjohnston, D. Polarization of Both Major Body Axes in Drosophila by Gurken-Torpedo Signaling. Nature 1995, 375, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lynch, J.A.; Peel, A.D.; Drechsler, A.; Averof, M.; Roth, S. EGF Signaling and the Origin of Axial Polarity among the Insects. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1042–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Andreu, M.J.; Gonzalez-Perez, E.; Ajuria, L.; Samper, N.; Gonzalez-Crespo, S.; Campuzano, S.; Jimenez, G. Mirror represses pipe expression in follicle cells to initiate dorsoventral axis formation in Drosophila. Development 2012, 139, 1110–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sen, J.; Goltz, J.S.; Stevens, L.; Stein, D. Spatially restricted expression of pipe in the Drosophila egg chamber defines embryonic dorsal-ventral polarity. Cell 1998, 95, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Konsolaki, M.; Schupbach, T. Windbeutel, a gene required for dorsoventral patterning in Drosophila, encodes a protein that has homologies to vertebrate proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Sen, J.; Goltz, J.S.; Konsolaki, M.; Schupbach, T.; Stein, D. Windbeutel is required for function and correct subcellular localization of the Drosophila patterning protein Pipe. Development 2000, 127, 5541–5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ma, Q.J.; Guo, C.S.; Barnewitz, K.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Soling, H.D.; Uson, I.; Ferrari, D.M. Crystal structure and functional analysis of Drosophila Wind, a protein-disulfide isomerase-related protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 44600–44607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kamiyama, S.; Suda, T.; Ueda, R.; Yoshida, H.; Kikuchi, N.; Chiba, Y.; Goto, S.; Toyoda, H.; Narimatsu, H.; Jigami, Y.; et al. Molecular cloning and identification of 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphosulfate transporter. Glycobiology 2003, 13, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Luders, F.; Segawa, H.; Stein, D.; Selva, E.M.; Perrimon, N.; Turco, S.J.; Hacker, U. slalom encodes an adenosine 3′-phosphate 5′-phosphosulfate transporter essential for development in Drosophila. Embo J. 2003, 22, 3635–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhang, Y.Z.; Stevens, L.M.; Stein, D. Sulfation of Eggshell Components by Pipe Defines Dorsal-Ventral Polarity in the Drosophila Embryo. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1200–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Cho, S.Y.; Stevens, L.M.; Stein, D. Pipe-Dependent Ventral Processing of Easter by Snake Is the Defining Step in Drosophila Embryo DV Axis Formation. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. LeMosy, E.K.; Hashimoto, C. The Nudel protease of Drosophila is required for eggshell biogenesis in addition to embryonic patterning. Mol. Biol. Cell 1999, 10, 341a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hong, C.C.; Hashimoto, C. An Unusual Mosaic Protein with a Protease Domain, Encoded by the Nudel Gene, Is Involved in Defining Embryonic Dorsoventral Polarity in Drosophila. Cell 1995, 82, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Konrad, K.D.; Goralski, T.J.; Mahowald, A.P.; Marsh, J.L. The gastrulation defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster is a member of the serine protease superfamily. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 6819–6824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Han, J.F.; Lee, S.H.; Tan, Y.Q.; LeMosy, E.K.; Hashimoto, C. Gastrulation defective is a serine protease involved in activating the receptor Toll to polarize the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9093–9097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. DeLotto, R.; Spierer, P. A gene required for the specification of dorsal-ventral pattern in Drosophila appears to encode a serine protease. Nature 1986, 323, 688–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chasan, R.; Anderson, K.V. The Role of Easter, an Apparent Serine Protease, in Organizing the Dorsal Ventral Pattern of the Drosophila Embryo. Cell 1989, 56, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chasan, R.; Jin, Y.; Anderson, K.V. Activation of the easter zymogen is regulated by five other genes to define dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Development 1992, 115, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Haskel-Ittah, M.; Ben-Zvi, D.; Branski-Arieli, M.; Schejter, E.D.; Shilo, B.Z.; Barkai, N. Self-Organized Shuttling: Generating Sharp Dorsoventral Polarity in the Early Drosophila Embryo. Cell 2012, 150, 1016–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Towb, P.; Galindo, R.L.; Wasserman, S.A. Recruitment of Tube and Pelle to signaling sites at the surface of the Drosophila embryo. Development 1998, 125, 2443–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Towb, P.; Bergmann, A.; Wasserman, S.A. The protein kinase Pelle mediates feedback regulation in the Drosophila Toll signaling pathway. Development 2001, 128, 4729–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Towb, P.; Sun, H.; Wasserman, S.A. Tube Is an IRAK-4 homolog in a Toll pathway adapted for development and immunity. J. Innate Immun. 2009, 1, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Hu, X.; Yagi, Y.; Tanji, T.; Zhou, S.; Ip, Y.T. Multimerization and interaction of Toll and Spatzle in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9369–9374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Grosshans, J.; Bergmann, A.; Haffter, P.; Nusslein-Volhard, C. Activation of the Kinase Pelle by Tube in the Dorsoventral Signal.-Transduction Pathway of Drosophila Embryo. Nature 1994, 372, 563–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Drier, A.E.; Huang, L.H.; Steward, R. Nuclear import of the Drosophila Rel protein Dorsal is regulated by phosphorylation. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 556–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Drier, E.A.; Govind, S.; Steward, R. Cactus-independent regulation of Dorsal nuclear import by the ventral signal. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Edwards, D.N.; Towb, P.; Wasserman, S.A. An activity-dependent network of interactions links the Rel protein Dorsal with its cytoplasmic regulators. Development 1997, 124, 3855–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Reach, M.; Galindo, R.L.; Towb, P.; Allen, J.L.; Karin, M.; Wasserman, S.A. A gradient of cactus protein degradation establishes dorsoventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 1996, 180, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Fernandez, N.Q.; Grosshans, J.; Goltz, J.S.; Stein, D. Separable and redundant regulatory determinants in Cactus mediate its dorsal group dependent degradation. Development 2001, 128, 2963–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Daigneault, J.; Klemetsaune, L.; Wasserman, S.A. The IRAK Homolog Pelle Is the Functional Counterpart of IκB Kinase in the Drosophila Toll Pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Uv, A.E.; Roth, P.; Xylourgidis, N.; Wickberg, A.; Cantera, R.; Samakovlis, C. Members only encodes a Drosophila nucleoporin required for Rel protein import and immune response activation. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1945–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Minakhina, S.; Yang, J.; Steward, R. Tamo selectively modulates nuclear import in Drosophila. Genes Cells 2003, 8, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hoffmann, A.; Levchenko, A.; Scott, M.L.; Baltimore, D. The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: Temporal control and selective gene activation. Science 2002, 298, 1241–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J.; et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lynch, J.A.; Desplan, C. A method for parental RNA interference in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pers, D.; Lynch, J.A. Ankyrin domain encoding genes from an ancient horizontal transfer are functionally integrated into Nasonia developmental gene regulatory networks. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pechmann, M.; Kenny, N.J.; Pott, L.; Heger, P.; Chen, Y.-T.; Buchta, T.; Özüak, O.; Lynch, J.; Roth, S. Striking parallels between dorsoventral patterning in Drosophila and Gryllus reveal a complex evolutionary history behind a model gene regulatory network. eLife 2021, 10, e68287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wilson, J.M.; Kenny, N.J.; Dearden, P.K. Components of the dorsal-ventral pathway also contribute to anterior-posterior patterning in honeybee embryos (Apis mellifera). EvoDevo 2014, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. DeLotto, Y.; DeLotto, R. Proteolytic processing of the Drosophila Spätzle protein by easter generates a dimeric NGF-like molecule with ventralising activity. Mech. Dev. 1998, 72, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Morisato, D.; Anderson, K.V. The spätzle gene encodes a component of the extracellular signaling pathway establishing the dorsal-ventral pattern of the Drosophila embryo. Cell 1994, 76, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Anthoney, N.; Foldi, I.; Hidalgo, A. Toll and Toll-like receptor signalling in development. Development. 2018, 145, dev156018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Benton, M.A.; Pechmann, M.; Frey, N.; Stappert, D.; Conrads, K.H.; Chen, Y.-T.; Stamataki, E.; Pavlopoulos, A.; Roth, S. Toll Genes Have an Ancestral Role in Axis Elongation. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 1609–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Paré, A.C.; Vichas, A.; Fincher, C.T.; Mirman, Z.; Farrell, D.L.; Mainieri, A.; Zallen, J.A. A positional Toll receptor code directs convergent extension in Drosophila. Nature 2014, 515, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Gerttula, S.; Jin, Y.; Anderson, K.V. Zygotic Expression and Activity of the Drosophila Toll Gene, a Gene Required Maternally for Embryonic Dorsal-Ventral Pattern-Formation. Genetics 1988, 119, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fisher, B.; Weiszmann, R.; Frise, E.; Hammonds, A.; Tomancak, P.; Beaton, A.; Berman, B.; Quan, E.; Shu, S.; Lewis, S.; et al. BDGP Insitu Homepage. 2012. Available online: http://insitu.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/ex/insitu.pl (accessed on 11 July 2014).
  89. Tomancak, P.; Beaton, A.; Weiszmann, R.; Kwan, E.; Shu, S.; Lewis, S.E.; Richards, S.; Ashburner, M.; Hartenstein, V.; Celniker, S.E.; et al. Systematic determination of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Weiszmann, R.; Hammonds, A.S.; Celniker, S.E. Determination of gene expression patterns using high-throughput RNA in situ hybridization to whole-mount Drosophila embryos. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Sachs, L.; Chen, Y.-T.; Drechsler, A.; Lynch, J.A.; Panfilio, K.A.; Lässig, M.; Berg, J.; Roth, S. Dynamic BMP signaling polarized by Toll patterns the dorsoventral axis in a hemimetabolous insect. eLife 2015, 4, e05502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nunes da Fonseca, R.; von Levetzow, C.; Kalscheuer, P.; Basal, A.; van der Zee, M.; Roth, S. Self-Regulatory Circuits in Dorsoventral Axis Formation of the Short-Germ Beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Cell 2008, 14, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Wulczyn, G.F.; Naumann, M.; Scheidereit, C. Candidate proto-oncogene bcl-3 encodes a subunit-specific inhibitor of transcription factor NF-κB. Nature 1992, 358, 597–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Morisato, D. Spatzle regulates the shape of the Dorsal gradient in the Drosophila embryo. Development 2001, 128, 2309–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Taylor, S.E.; Tuffery, J.; Bakopoulos, D.; Lequeux, S.; Warr, C.G.; Johnson, T.K.; Dearden, P.K. The torso-like gene functions to maintain the structure of the vitelline membrane in Nasonia vitripennis, implying its co-option into Drosophila axis formation. Biol. Open 2019, 8, bio046284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Pultz, M.A.; Zimmerman, K.K.; Alto, N.M.; Kaeberlein, M.; Lange, S.K.; Pitt, J.N.; Reeves, N.L.; Zehrung, D.L. A genetic screen for zygotic embryonic lethal mutations affecting cuticular morphology in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics 2000, 154, 1213–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. DeLotto, R. Gastrulation defective, a Complement factor C2/B-like protease, interprets a ventral prepattern in Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Summary of the components of the Drosophila Toll pathway used for comparison here. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Summary of the components of the Drosophila Toll pathway used for comparison here. Created with BioRender.com.
Jdb 10 00007 g001
Figure 2. Expression of vitelline membrane altering components. (A) Schematic drawing of two N. vitripennis egg chambers. fc = follicle cell layer, oo = oocyte, nc = nurse cells. Somatic tissue is shown in green; pink tissue is germline. The upper egg chamber represents early oogenesis, where the oocyte is smaller than the nurse cell compartment, while the lower egg chamber represents late oogenesis. Mid-oogenesis is when the two compartments are roughly the same size. None of Nv-wbl (B), Nv-sll (C), or Nv-pip (D) are expressed detectably in the ovary of N. vitrpennis. Mid- and late-stage egg chamber shown.
Figure 2. Expression of vitelline membrane altering components. (A) Schematic drawing of two N. vitripennis egg chambers. fc = follicle cell layer, oo = oocyte, nc = nurse cells. Somatic tissue is shown in green; pink tissue is germline. The upper egg chamber represents early oogenesis, where the oocyte is smaller than the nurse cell compartment, while the lower egg chamber represents late oogenesis. Mid-oogenesis is when the two compartments are roughly the same size. None of Nv-wbl (B), Nv-sll (C), or Nv-pip (D) are expressed detectably in the ovary of N. vitrpennis. Mid- and late-stage egg chamber shown.
Jdb 10 00007 g002
Figure 3. mRNA expression of proteolytic cascade components in the N. vitrpennis ovarioles. (A) Nv-ndl is ubiquitously expressed in follicle cells of mid- and late- (not shown) stage ovarioles, but not in germline cells. (B) In early- and mid-stage egg chambers, Nv-gd1 is expressed throughout the follicle cells. (C) Later, Nv-gd1 becomes restricted to only half of the follicle cells surrounding the late oocyte. (D) Nv-ea1 is expressed broadly in the oocyte from early stages (shown) on, but is restricted to only the posterior nurse cells. (E) Nv-spz1 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and in the nurse cells. Anterior is at the top.
Figure 3. mRNA expression of proteolytic cascade components in the N. vitrpennis ovarioles. (A) Nv-ndl is ubiquitously expressed in follicle cells of mid- and late- (not shown) stage ovarioles, but not in germline cells. (B) In early- and mid-stage egg chambers, Nv-gd1 is expressed throughout the follicle cells. (C) Later, Nv-gd1 becomes restricted to only half of the follicle cells surrounding the late oocyte. (D) Nv-ea1 is expressed broadly in the oocyte from early stages (shown) on, but is restricted to only the posterior nurse cells. (E) Nv-spz1 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and in the nurse cells. Anterior is at the top.
Jdb 10 00007 g003
Figure 4. mRNA expression of proteolytic cascade components during N. vitrpennis embryogenesis. Nv-gd2 is initially expressed ubiquitously at low levels in the pre-blastoderm stages (A) before being restricted from the cortex and having elevated expression in the cytoplasm/yolk of the syncytial blastoderm (B). (C) Nv-snk is expressed ubiquitously at low levels in the early (pre- to early blastoderm (shown)) embryo. (DH) Nv-spn27A is initially expressed in a narrow, anterior stripe along the dorsal midline (D) before elongating to the posterior pole during the late syncytial blastoderm stage (E). The stripe later retracts from the posterior pole (F), expands laterally (G), and finally becomes localized to the presumptive extraembryonic material after gastrulation (H). (I,J) Nv-spz2 is ubiquitously expressed throughout the early blastoderm embryo, with elevated expression along the dorsal midline (I). Elevated expression then expands laterally, creating a broad ring around the entire circumference of the embryo, from the thoracic to the anterior abdominal segments at the late blastoderm stages (J). Anterior is to the left and dorsal is at the top (except in D,F,H; dorsal views).
Figure 4. mRNA expression of proteolytic cascade components during N. vitrpennis embryogenesis. Nv-gd2 is initially expressed ubiquitously at low levels in the pre-blastoderm stages (A) before being restricted from the cortex and having elevated expression in the cytoplasm/yolk of the syncytial blastoderm (B). (C) Nv-snk is expressed ubiquitously at low levels in the early (pre- to early blastoderm (shown)) embryo. (DH) Nv-spn27A is initially expressed in a narrow, anterior stripe along the dorsal midline (D) before elongating to the posterior pole during the late syncytial blastoderm stage (E). The stripe later retracts from the posterior pole (F), expands laterally (G), and finally becomes localized to the presumptive extraembryonic material after gastrulation (H). (I,J) Nv-spz2 is ubiquitously expressed throughout the early blastoderm embryo, with elevated expression along the dorsal midline (I). Elevated expression then expands laterally, creating a broad ring around the entire circumference of the embryo, from the thoracic to the anterior abdominal segments at the late blastoderm stages (J). Anterior is to the left and dorsal is at the top (except in D,F,H; dorsal views).
Jdb 10 00007 g004
Figure 5. mRNA expression of Toll paralogs in N. vitrpennis ovarioles and embryos. (AD) Egg chambers at mid to late oogenesis shown. (A) Nv-TollA is localized posteriorly in the oocyte. (B) Nv-TollC is strongly enriched at both the anterior and posterior poles of the oocyte and has elevated expression in the posterior of the nurse cells. (C) Nv-TollD is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells. (D,E) Nv-TollA is initially ubiquitously expressed, with elevated expression at the anterior and posterior ends in the very early blastoderm stage (D). Expression then becomes restricted to just the pole, before expanding along the ventral midline in mid to late blastoderm stages (E). (FH) Nv-TollC is initially expressed at the anterior and posterior poles at mid blastoderm before elongating along the ventral midline in the late blastoderm (F). The stripe later outlines the mesoderm–ectoderm border (G). Expression expands ventrally filling in the presumptive mesoderm at gastrulation (H). (l) Nv-TollD is expressed ubiquitously at low levels (mid blastoderm stage shown).
Figure 5. mRNA expression of Toll paralogs in N. vitrpennis ovarioles and embryos. (AD) Egg chambers at mid to late oogenesis shown. (A) Nv-TollA is localized posteriorly in the oocyte. (B) Nv-TollC is strongly enriched at both the anterior and posterior poles of the oocyte and has elevated expression in the posterior of the nurse cells. (C) Nv-TollD is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells. (D,E) Nv-TollA is initially ubiquitously expressed, with elevated expression at the anterior and posterior ends in the very early blastoderm stage (D). Expression then becomes restricted to just the pole, before expanding along the ventral midline in mid to late blastoderm stages (E). (FH) Nv-TollC is initially expressed at the anterior and posterior poles at mid blastoderm before elongating along the ventral midline in the late blastoderm (F). The stripe later outlines the mesoderm–ectoderm border (G). Expression expands ventrally filling in the presumptive mesoderm at gastrulation (H). (l) Nv-TollD is expressed ubiquitously at low levels (mid blastoderm stage shown).
Jdb 10 00007 g005
Figure 6. Membrane-associated components’ expression in ovaries and embryos. (A) Nv-tub is expressed in nurse cells, oocytes, and follicle cells from early stages of oogenesis onward (early stage shown). (BD) Membrane-associated components (B) Nv-tub, (C) Nv-pll, (D) Nv-pll2, and (E) Nv-myd88 are ubiquitously expressed throughout early embryogenesis (mid blastoderm stages shown).
Figure 6. Membrane-associated components’ expression in ovaries and embryos. (A) Nv-tub is expressed in nurse cells, oocytes, and follicle cells from early stages of oogenesis onward (early stage shown). (BD) Membrane-associated components (B) Nv-tub, (C) Nv-pll, (D) Nv-pll2, and (E) Nv-myd88 are ubiquitously expressed throughout early embryogenesis (mid blastoderm stages shown).
Jdb 10 00007 g006
Figure 7. Expression of Nv-cact paralogs. (A) Nv-cact1 is expressed in the oocyte, follicle cells, and most of the nurse cell compartment throughout early, mid, and late oogenesis (early and mid stages shown). (B) Nv-cact2 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells throughout oogenesis (mid and late stages shown). (C) Nv-cact3 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells, with enhanced expression in posterior nurse cells (mid oogenesis stages shown). (D,E) In early blastoderm embryos, Nv-cact1 is expressed in a narrow stripe along the ventral midline (D) which remains throughout the late blastoderm stage (E). (F,G) Nv-cact2 is initially expressed ubiquitously in the early blastoderm (F), before gaining elevated expression along the ventral midline in late oogenesis (G).
Figure 7. Expression of Nv-cact paralogs. (A) Nv-cact1 is expressed in the oocyte, follicle cells, and most of the nurse cell compartment throughout early, mid, and late oogenesis (early and mid stages shown). (B) Nv-cact2 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells throughout oogenesis (mid and late stages shown). (C) Nv-cact3 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells, with enhanced expression in posterior nurse cells (mid oogenesis stages shown). (D,E) In early blastoderm embryos, Nv-cact1 is expressed in a narrow stripe along the ventral midline (D) which remains throughout the late blastoderm stage (E). (F,G) Nv-cact2 is initially expressed ubiquitously in the early blastoderm (F), before gaining elevated expression along the ventral midline in late oogenesis (G).
Jdb 10 00007 g007
Figure 8. Expression of Nv-bcl3 in ovaries and embryos. (A) Nv-bcl3 is ubiquitously expressed in oocytes, lacking in the follicle cells, and is restricted to the posterior of the nurse cells (early to mid oogenesis shown). (B) In the early blastoderm, Nv-bcl3 is expressed ubiquitously with variation in intensity along the AP axis. (C) Expression evolves into broad stripes with fuzzy borders into late blastoderm stages. (D) After gastrulation, Nv-bcl3 is expressed in scattered cells of unknown fate.
Figure 8. Expression of Nv-bcl3 in ovaries and embryos. (A) Nv-bcl3 is ubiquitously expressed in oocytes, lacking in the follicle cells, and is restricted to the posterior of the nurse cells (early to mid oogenesis shown). (B) In the early blastoderm, Nv-bcl3 is expressed ubiquitously with variation in intensity along the AP axis. (C) Expression evolves into broad stripes with fuzzy borders into late blastoderm stages. (D) After gastrulation, Nv-bcl3 is expressed in scattered cells of unknown fate.
Jdb 10 00007 g008
Figure 9. mRNA expression of dorsal paralogs in N. vitrpennis ovarioles and embryos. (A) Nv-dl1 is expressed ubiquitously in the oocyte and most of the nurse cells, except for the most anterior ones (mid to late oogenesis shown) (B) Nv-dl2 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells. (C) Nv-dl3 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte, and is strongly upregulated in the posterior of the nurse cells (early to mid stages shown). (D) Nv-dl4 is expressed in the oocyte and the nurse cells, with expression concentrated in posterior nurse cells (mid to late stages shown). Nv-dl1 (E), Nv-dl2 (F), Nv-dl3 (G), and Nv-dl4 (H) are ubiquitously expressed in the embryo (early blastoderm stages shown). Anterior is at the top for ovaries and to the left for embryos.
Figure 9. mRNA expression of dorsal paralogs in N. vitrpennis ovarioles and embryos. (A) Nv-dl1 is expressed ubiquitously in the oocyte and most of the nurse cells, except for the most anterior ones (mid to late oogenesis shown) (B) Nv-dl2 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte and nurse cells. (C) Nv-dl3 is ubiquitously expressed in the oocyte, and is strongly upregulated in the posterior of the nurse cells (early to mid stages shown). (D) Nv-dl4 is expressed in the oocyte and the nurse cells, with expression concentrated in posterior nurse cells (mid to late stages shown). Nv-dl1 (E), Nv-dl2 (F), Nv-dl3 (G), and Nv-dl4 (H) are ubiquitously expressed in the embryo (early blastoderm stages shown). Anterior is at the top for ovaries and to the left for embryos.
Jdb 10 00007 g009
Figure 10. mRNA expression and embryonic lethality following pRNAi. (AD) Relative transcript expression (blue) following pRNAi as a percentage of wildtype expression compared to the percentage of eggs laid that failed to develop into larva (embryonic lethality, red) from the same batch of wasps following pRNAi treatment. The X-axis represents different batches of RNAi injected wasps. Wasps were injected with dsRNA targeting dorsal1 (A), dorsal2 (B), dorsal3 (C), dorsal4 (D). Error bars represent standard error.
Figure 10. mRNA expression and embryonic lethality following pRNAi. (AD) Relative transcript expression (blue) following pRNAi as a percentage of wildtype expression compared to the percentage of eggs laid that failed to develop into larva (embryonic lethality, red) from the same batch of wasps following pRNAi treatment. The X-axis represents different batches of RNAi injected wasps. Wasps were injected with dsRNA targeting dorsal1 (A), dorsal2 (B), dorsal3 (C), dorsal4 (D). Error bars represent standard error.
Jdb 10 00007 g010
Figure 11. RNAi knockdown of Nv-spz1. (A) Ventral view of Nv-twi and Nv-vnd (red and green, respectively) in a wildtype embryo in late blastoderm stage. (B,C) A strong (B) and a weaker (C) Nv-spz1 dorsalizing phenotype in late blastoderm embryos.
Figure 11. RNAi knockdown of Nv-spz1. (A) Ventral view of Nv-twi and Nv-vnd (red and green, respectively) in a wildtype embryo in late blastoderm stage. (B,C) A strong (B) and a weaker (C) Nv-spz1 dorsalizing phenotype in late blastoderm embryos.
Jdb 10 00007 g011
Table 1. Summary of Toll Pathway component expression in the fly and wasp. Tissue-based expression domains in both the fly and wasp are provided for each pathway component based on previous [88,89,90] and current studies (color has been added to emphasize similarities/differences). RNAi phenotypes observed in the wasp include: X = no phenotype, D = dorsalized, I = immune/sick wasps, F = flaccid/fragile eggs, N/A = not tested.
Table 1. Summary of Toll Pathway component expression in the fly and wasp. Tissue-based expression domains in both the fly and wasp are provided for each pathway component based on previous [88,89,90] and current studies (color has been added to emphasize similarities/differences). RNAi phenotypes observed in the wasp include: X = no phenotype, D = dorsalized, I = immune/sick wasps, F = flaccid/fragile eggs, N/A = not tested.
Drosophila ProteinNasonia OrthologDrosophila Transcript ExpressionNasonia Transcript ExpressionRNAi
Follicular Epithelium Components Follicle cellsOocyteEarly EmbryoFollicle cellsOocyteEarly EmbryoPhenotype
WindbeutelNv-WblYESNONONONONOX
SlalomNv-SllYESNONONONONON/A
PipeNv-PipYESNONONONONOX
Perivitelline Space Components
NudelNv-NdlYESNONOYESNONOF
Gastrulation defectiveNv-GdYESYESYESYESYESNOX
Nv-Gd2---NONOYESX
SnakeNv-SnkNOYESYESNONOYESX
Nv-Snk2---NONONON/A
EasterNv-Ea1NOYESYESNOYESNOX
Nv-Ea2---NONONOX
Serpin27ANv-Spn27ANOYESYESNONOYESN/A
SpatzleNv-Spz1NOYESYESNOYESNOD
Nv-Spz2---NONOYESD
Toll Receptors
TollNv-TollANOYESYESNOYESYESD
Nv-TollB---NONONOX
Nv-TollC---NOYESYESX
Nv-TollD---NOYESYESI
Intracellular Components
TubeNv-TubNOYESYESNOYESYESI
PelleNv-Pll1NOYESYESNONOYESI
Nv-Pll2---NONOYESD
Myd88Nv-Myd88NOYESYESNONOYESI
CactusNv-Cact1NOYESYESYESYESYESX
Nv-Cact2---YESYESYESX
Nv-Cact3---YESYESNOX
B-cell lymphoma 3 (mammalian)Nv-Bcl3N/AN/AN/ANOYESYESX
DorsalNv-Dl1NOYESYESNOYESYESX
Nv-Dl2---NOYESYESX
Nv-Dl3---NOYESYESX
Nv-Dl4---NOYESYESX
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pers, D.; Buchta, T.; Özüak, O.; Roth, S.; Lynch, J.A. Expression and Function of Toll Pathway Components in the Early Development of the Wasp Nasonia vitripennis. J. Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb10010007

AMA Style

Pers D, Buchta T, Özüak O, Roth S, Lynch JA. Expression and Function of Toll Pathway Components in the Early Development of the Wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Journal of Developmental Biology. 2022; 10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb10010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pers, Daniel, Thomas Buchta, Orhan Özüak, Siegfried Roth, and Jeremy A. Lynch. 2022. "Expression and Function of Toll Pathway Components in the Early Development of the Wasp Nasonia vitripennis" Journal of Developmental Biology 10, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb10010007

APA Style

Pers, D., Buchta, T., Özüak, O., Roth, S., & Lynch, J. A. (2022). Expression and Function of Toll Pathway Components in the Early Development of the Wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Journal of Developmental Biology, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb10010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop