Next Article in Journal
Proximity Operations and Three Degree-of-Freedom Maneuvers Using the Smartphone Video Guidance Sensor
Next Article in Special Issue
Teachers’ Opinions towards Educational Robotics for Special Needs Students: An Exploratory Italian Study
Previous Article in Journal
FloorVLoc: A Modular Approach to Floorplan Monocular Localization
Communication

Computational Design Thinking and Physical Computing: Preliminary Observations of a Pilot Study

European Training and Research Association for a Cooperation Key to business (EU-Track), 04019 Terracina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Robotics 2020, 9(3), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9030071
Received: 20 July 2020 / Revised: 3 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published: 10 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Challenges in Educational Robotics)
Today’s technological development inevitably defies educational approaches in terms of future demand for skills to be imparted. Among other skills, the capacity to operate and communicate effectively within multidisciplinary realms is duly considered as the fundamental one. Educational robotics (ER) and STEM do constitute a suitable framework for the development of these specific skills. Moreover, competences such as computational (CT) and design thinking (DT) have already been nominated as necessary to adapt to the future and relevant for innovation. The years of independent development and evidence of practical implementation justify the maturity of the related methodological approaches and emerging gradual shift towards their combination. In this regard, the actual work presents a pilot experience of the combined application of computational design thinking and educational robotics in the case of a 9-to-11-year-old target audience. The approach utilizes a novel platform developed under the project Coding4Girls combining design thinking and game-based learning and introduces physical computing through consecutive assembling and programming an IR-controlled robot-car. The core of the learning path consists in the development of primary programming skills and their gradual transfer into the physical realm. The method, as the study demonstrates, is capable of helping keep students both motivated and result-oriented throughout the duration of the course. View Full-Text
Keywords: computational thinking; design thinking; STEM; physical computing; robotics education; coding; multidisciplinarity computational thinking; design thinking; STEM; physical computing; robotics education; coding; multidisciplinarity
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Alden, D.; Tramonti, M. Computational Design Thinking and Physical Computing: Preliminary Observations of a Pilot Study. Robotics 2020, 9, 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9030071

AMA Style

Alden D, Tramonti M. Computational Design Thinking and Physical Computing: Preliminary Observations of a Pilot Study. Robotics. 2020; 9(3):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9030071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alden, Dochshanov, and Michela Tramonti. 2020. "Computational Design Thinking and Physical Computing: Preliminary Observations of a Pilot Study" Robotics 9, no. 3: 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9030071

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop