Next Article in Journal
pH Homeodynamics and Male Fertility: A Coordinated Regulation of Acid-Based Balance during Sperm Journey to Fertilization
Next Article in Special Issue
The Formation of Stable Lung Tumor Spheroids during Random Positioning Involves Increased Estrogen Sensitivity
Previous Article in Journal
The Long Journey from Animal Electricity to the Discovery of Ion Channels and the Modelling of the Human Brain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cellular and Molecular Effects of Microgravity on the Immune System: A Focus on Bioactive Lipids
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Integration of Proteomic and Metabolomic Data Reveals the Lipid Metabolism Disorder in the Liver of Rats Exposed to Simulated Microgravity

Biomolecules 2024, 14(6), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14060682
by Mengyao Ru 1,2, Jun He 3, Yungang Bai 4, Kun Zhang 1,2, Qianqian Shi 2,5, Fang Gao 6, Yunying Wang 4, Baoli Li 7,* and Lan Shen 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Biomolecules 2024, 14(6), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14060682
Submission received: 24 May 2024 / Revised: 5 June 2024 / Accepted: 6 June 2024 / Published: 12 June 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors present a thoroughly planned and conducted multi-omic study comparing liver samples from rats subjected to tail suspension as a simulation of microgravity and rats held under standard conditions.

The experiment design and rationale is well explained and the results are presented in a clear way and are of relevance to the field.

There are, however, three minor points that the authors might want to address:

1.) I would recommend to present the data as mean +- SD and not SEM, as this accounts better for the actual variance of the data (see also Barde MP, Barde PJ. What to use to express the variability of data: Standard deviation or standard error of mean? Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jul;3(3):113-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.100662. PMID: 23125963; PMCID: PMC3487226)

2.) It would have been interesting to know whether there were differences in the food intake between the two groups.

3.) The labels on Figs. 3-5 are very hard to read

Apart from this, I have no other comments and I recommend the publication of the manuscript after a minor revision.

 

Author Response

Please refer to the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Introduction: Authors state that they will identify potential drug targets (p.2, line 86-87). Is it revealed later, which targets have been detected?

 

 Methods: Please comment in some more detail on the tail suspension model. Is it really suitable to simulate microgravity?

 

 Results: was loss of bodyweight caused by simulation of microgravity, or just by immobilization and consecutive loss of muscle mass?

 

 Discussion: Can authors discuss the consequences of their findings in more detail? The fact that (simulated) microgravity causes fatty liver disease has been known before. Is there a way to counteract this problem?

 

Are there any theories that can explain accumulation of fat in the liver under simulated or real microgravity?

  

A conclusion should be provided after the discussion

 Figures: The letters of the figure labelling are very small and therefore hard to read.

Author Response

Please refer to the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop