Next Article in Journal
Gadolinium in Medical Imaging—Usefulness, Toxic Reactions and Possible Countermeasures—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of the 20S Proteasome Activity by Porphyrin Derivatives Is Steered through Their Charge Distribution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Similarity and Diversity of Presynaptic Molecules at Neuromuscular Junctions and Central Synapses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/biom12060740
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Neuromuscular Active Zone Structure and Function in Healthy and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome States

by
Scott P. Ginebaugh
,
Yomna Badawi
,
Tyler B. Tarr
and
Stephen D. Meriney
*
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(6), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12060740
Submission received: 8 April 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 18 May 2022 / Published: 24 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Neuromuscular Junction in Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The mouse neuromuscular junction (NMJ) has long been used as a model synapse for the study of neurotransmission in both healthy and disease states of the NMJ. Neurotransmission from these neuromuscular nerve terminals occurs at highly organized structures called active zones (AZs). Within AZs, the relationships between the voltage-gated calcium channels and docked synaptic vesicles govern the probability of acetylcholine release during single action potentials, and the short-term plasticity characteristics during short, high frequency trains of action potentials. Understanding these relationships is important not only for healthy synapses, but also to better understand the pathophysiology of neuromuscular diseases. In particular, we are interested in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), an autoimmune disorder in which neurotransmitter release from the NMJ decreases, leading to severe muscle weakness. In LEMS, the reduced neurotransmission is traditionally thought to be caused by the antibody-mediated removal of presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels. However, recent experimental data and AZ computer simulations have predicted that a disruption in the normally highly organized active zone structure, and perhaps autoantibodies to other presynaptic proteins, contribute significantly to pathological effects in the active zone and the characteristics of chemical transmitters.

1. Introduction

Neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) are essential for movement, and thus are essential for normal function. Because of the importance of NMJs to normal functioning, NMJs have evolved a variety of properties that allow them to function under a wide range of conditions. Two such properties are the strength and reliability of NMJs. Here, strength refers to the fact that a typical presynaptic action potential (AP) causes a release of transmitters in excess of what is necessary to lead to the contraction of the postsynaptic muscle fibers. Reliability refers to the fact that the NMJ can repeatedly stimulate, or cause the sustained contraction of, the postsynaptic muscle fibers [1,2].
The release of neurotransmitters from the presynaptic terminals of neurons occurs at specialized regions of the presynaptic membrane called active zones (AZs), which contain docked synaptic vesicles, voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC), and a variety of structural, membrane-fusion facilitating, and calcium-sensing proteins [3]. The overall function of the NMJ is governed by the probability of chemical transmitter release from hundreds of AZs within each motor nerve terminal. The probability of transmitter release is determined by the presynaptic AP waveform, the gating of presynaptic VGCCs, the sensitivity of calcium sensors on docked synaptic vesicles, and the spatial relationship between VGCCs and docked synaptic vesicles [4,5,6].
Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) is a rare autoimmune neuromuscular disease in which the immune system attacks proteins in the AZ structure of the NMJ [7,8]. This attack is thought to reduce the number and organization of VGCCs and other proteins associated with the AZ [9,10]. As a result of this attack, LEMS results in a reduction in the magnitude of neurotransmitter release from the NMJ, which leads to severe muscle weakness for LEMS patients [11].

2. Action Potential Triggered Calcium Entry

The AP is often considered as a binary signal that propagates down the motor axon to the nerve terminal, causing a release of neurotransmitters into the synapse upon reaching the nerve terminal [12,13,14]. However, it is clear even from early work on the squid giant axon AP [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] that the size, shape, and conduction velocity of the AP play an important role in regulating communication. Neurons regulate the propagation and shape of the AP with a heterogeneous distribution of ion channels, and the shape of the AP waveform can vary greatly between different neuron types [22] and within different regions of the same neuron [12,23,24,25].
Despite the importance of the AP waveform to the function of nerves and synapses, the shape of the AP waveform and how changes in this waveform impact the function of synapses are relatively understudied. This is primarily due to the fact that presynaptic nerve terminals at most synapses are too small to probe with an electrode (with a few notable exceptions). Regarding the mammalian motor nerve terminal, recently, Ojala et al. [26] used voltage imaging to characterize the presynaptic AP waveform. In these studies, they reported that motor-nerve-terminal APs are exceptionally brief, with a full width of 250–350 μs at half maximal amplitude (Figure 1). The brief duration of these AP waveforms is thought to be due in part to the selective expression of voltage-gated potassium channels of the Kv3.3 and 3.4 type [27], and calcium-activated potassium channels [28] within AZs which can increase the rate of repolarization.
These very brief APs are thought to only activate a small fraction of the available calcium channels within AZs. Research using a single pixel optical fluctuation analysis on calcium imaging at the frog NMJ suggests a one-to-one relationship between docked synaptic vesicles and voltage-gated calcium channels in the AZ. Furthermore, calcium imaging found that these AZ voltage-gated calcium channels have only a 0.2 probability of opening during an AP [29,30]. Thus, only a small fraction of voltage-gated calcium channels would be expected to open in each AZ during an AP. This paucity in the total number of voltage-gated calcium channels in each AZ, combined with the low probability that these channels would open during the very brief presynaptic AP provides a mechanism which can explain the low probability of release for synaptic vesicles. The resulting unreliable synaptic vesicle release per AZ is hypothesized to contribute to the reliability of the synapse as a whole by ensuring that, even during repeated stimulation, the synapse will only use a small fraction of the available docked synaptic vesicles and not become depleted of these synaptic vesicles during prolonged and repeated activity [31]. Although this hypothesis is generally accepted, it should be noted that it has not yet been tested experimentally.

3. Active Zone Structure and Organization at Healthy Synapses

Active zones (AZs) are specialized structures on the presynaptic plasma membrane of synapses where neurotransmitter release occurs [3,32]. Early imaging studies showed that AZs contain docked synaptic vesicles and numerous intramembranous particles (Figure 2) [33,34,35,36]. These intramembranous proteins are hypothesized to include structural and functional proteins necessary for synaptic vesicle exocytosis; most prominently, the voltage-gated calcium channels. The mouse NMJ has a “pretzel” shape with small AZs (Figure 2). Each AZ contains, on average, a single row of two docked synaptic vesicles surrounded on both sides by double rows of intramembranous particles, containing approximately 20 particles in total (Figure 2) [10,36]. The average mouse NMJ contains approximately 700 of these AZs [5,37,38], each placed approximately 500 nm apart [37]. During a single AP, the mouse NMJ releases approximately 160 vesicles of neurotransmitters (Figure 2). This corresponds to a 0.22 probability of release from any given AZ during an AP, and, assuming two docked synaptic vesicles per AZ, a 0.11 probability of release per docked synaptic vesicle [5].
Super-resolution microscopy was used to study the distribution of active zone-specific proteins at mammalian NMJs. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy revealed the punctate staining of P/Q-type VGCC and Bassoon in nerve terminals, with the two proteins co-localizing together (Figure 2D) [39], consistent with their direct interaction [40]. Bassoon is a large scaffolding protein that contributes to the cytomatrix assembled at the AZ. The P/Q-type VGCC and Bassoon puncta aligned with bright linear areas of α-BTX staining representing junctional folds [41], which is consistent with the alignment of pre-synaptic AZs with junctional folds using electron microscopy and electron tomography [36,42]. The active zone protein Piccolo (another large scaffold-like cytomatrix protein at AZs) shares structural and functional similarities to Bassoon [43,44,45,46] and also overlaps with post-synaptic junctional folds [39]. STED microscopy demonstrated that Bassoon and Piccolo did not overlap in their distribution within adult mouse NMJs but instead were localized side-by-side in a Piccolo-Bassoon-Piccolo sandwich pattern (Figure 2E) [39]. This can represent a functional unit in the AZ structure characterized by electron microscope tomography [36]. Hypothetically, the AZ material macromolecules visualized in models based on electron tomography described as “pegs” are transmembrane proteins and may include P/Q-type VGCCs, while the “ribs” include Bassoon, and the “beams” represent Piccolo [39,47] (Figure 2F). Further speculation on the possible protein identities and contributions to the AZ macromolecules at the NMJ has been recently reviewed [48]. The additional mapping of super-resolution microscopy results onto AZ models developed based on EM tomography may yield important insights into AZ organization in both healthy and disease states.

4. Structure-Function Relationships in the NMJ

It is clear from a comparison of AZ structures across many synaptic types that there are many ways to assemble the components required to couple presynaptic AP activity with chemical transmitter release [49]. One important question is as follows: How does the synaptic function depend on the particular manner by which AZs are organized or built?
At the frog NMJ, Propst and Ko [50] combined electrophysiological recordings with the freeze fracture of identified NMJs and concluded that AZ size and spacing are better indicators of transmitter release than total NMJ size. Furthermore, Herrera et al. [51] used freeze fracture techniques to compare naturally occurring differences in synaptic strength between different types of muscles and found that NMJs with stronger transmitter release have significantly larger active zones. In addition, Herrera et al. [52] experimentally altered the magnitude of transmitter release in a long-lasting manner using contralateral denervation and concluded that changes in AZ size act as the structural basis for long-term changes in synaptic function. In addition to the total size of these AZ structures being important for synaptic function, there is also evidence that acutely disrupting the highly ordered structure can have a significant effects on transmitter release characteristics. After a three-hour exposure to a very low level of extracellular calcium (0.1 nM, which breaks divalent-dependent adhesion interactions in the synaptic cleft that are hypothesized to help hold AZ components in place), Meriney et al. [53] used freeze fracture to show that frog NMJ AZs broke into pieces and also displayed some dispersion of AZ proteins. When these disrupted AZs were returned to normal extracellular calcium to measure transmitter release, the AZ disruption was maintained for a long enough period to document a slight reduction in the magnitude of transmitter release, and a strong increase in short-term synaptic facilitation. These experiments demonstrated that disrupting AZ organization can profoundly affect synaptic function. Furthermore, these experiments isolate the effects of AZ-zone disruption on synaptic function, which is relevant in the consideration of the impact of various effects of the neuromuscular disease pathology of Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) on synaptic functions (see below).

5. Computer Modeling of Active Zone Structure and Function

The impact of AZ organization has also been predicted using Monte Carlo Cell (MCell) to simulate diffusion and reaction events within the motor nerve terminal to model synaptic AZ anatomy and microphysiology. MCell is a stochastic particle-based diffusion-reaction simulator that can model biological systems with arbitrarily complex 3D geometries [54,55,56]. In MCell models of the NMJ AZs, an AP waveform is used to cause VGCCs to open according to a Markov-chain ion channel gating scheme. Calcium ions emanating from open VGCCs then diffuse into the nerve terminal space and can bind to the calcium buffer or calcium sensor proteins on synaptic vesicles.
Homan et al. [57] varied the density and distribution of VGCCs in a refined MCell model of the frog AZ (based on previously developed models of the frog AZ [58,59]) and demonstrated that these manipulations were predicted to significantly alter synaptic function (including the magnitude of transmitter release and the synaptic delay). By studying the impact of specific and systematic changes in AZ organization and VGCC density, Homan et al. [57] provided a foundation for further MCell modeling studies investigating the importance of AZ organization on synaptic function. Subsequently, Laghaei et al. [5] used MCell to compare the AZ organization in frog and mouse NMJs, each of which use similar AZ elements, but arrange them in different patterns. Frogs possess a very long (~1 μm) double row of proteins in their AZ array with 20–40 docked synaptic vesicles on the sides of these long arrays of proteins, while mice have very short arrays of AZ proteins (~150 nm) and two docked synaptic vesicles between the AZ protein arrays (see Figure 2). By simply rearranging the frog AZ elements into a mouse AZ organization (without changing any of the properties of the elements), Laghaei et al. [5] showed that their MCell models could recapitulate the known differences in short-term synaptic plasticity between these two synapses (frog NMJs facilitate strongly, while mouse NMJs have very little short-term synaptic plasticity). Furthermore, MCell models of the mouse AZs models are able to match many experimental electrophysiological results, including the probability of release per AZ of 0.22, a paired pulse facilitation that is relatively unchanged by changes in the inter-spike interval, and the log–log ratio between extracellular calcium and transmitter release (also known as the calcium-release ratio) [5]. These studies highlight the importance of AZ organization and structure in synapse functions.

6. Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

LEMS is an autoimmune-mediated neuromuscular disease in which the immune system attacks proteins in the NMJ AZ (especially the AZ voltage-gated calcium channels). LEMS is a rare disease with a prevalence of 3.4 cases per million people [8], and is often considered as a paraneoplastic syndrome because 50–60% of cases are associated with small-cell lung carcinoma [60]. In rare cases, LEMS has been associated with other malignancies such as non-small cell lung carcinoma [61] and prostate carcinoma [62]. Paraneoplastic instances of LEMS tend to be associated with older, male patients with a long-term history of smoking, whereas idiopathic LEMS patients tend to be younger and are more likely to be female. In almost all paraneoplastic LEMS cases, LEMS symptoms precede the diagnosis of small-cell lung carcinoma, and LEMS patients are routinely screened for lung cancer after their LEMS diagnosis [8]. The paraneoplastic relationship of LEMS with small-cell lung carcinoma is due to the fact that small-cell lung carcinomas are neuroendocrine in origin [63] and tend to overexpress VGCCs as well as other AZ proteins [64]. Thus, paraneoplastic LEMS is a result of the immune system response to the tumor [65].
The LEMS-mediated decrease in the number of voltage-gated calcium channels leads to a reduced calcium influx during an AP, and a subsequent reduction in the amount of neurotransmitters released [66]. This reduction in transmitter release results in muscle weakness which significantly limits the daily living-related activities of patients. Specific changes to the AZ structure and function in the LEMS disease state underlies the root pathophysiological cause of the disease symptoms. The presence of antibodies targeting AZ P/Q-type VGCCs is thought to support a LEMS diagnosis [7], but is not a complete explanation of the immune nature of LEMS. Although anti-P/Q-type VGCCs are the most common antibody reported, they are not present in 5–20% of LEMS patients [67,68,69,70]. This suggests that the immune nature of LEMS is more complicated than simply the presence or absence of P/Q-type VGCC antibodies. In fact, LEMS patients have been shown to produce auto-antibodies to a variety of presynaptic proteins, including synaptotagmin [68] and M1-type presynaptic muscarinic acetylcholine receptors [71].

7. The Passive Transfer Mouse Model for LEMS

Because LEMS is an antibody-mediated disease, and because many of the proteins targeted by LEMS are well-conserved between species, LEMS can be passively transferred to mice by repeatedly injecting them with serum from human LEMS patients [9,72]. The creation of these LEMS mice has facilitated a wide variety of investigations into the neuromuscular pathophysiology of LEMS.
Early freeze fracture electron microscopy studies of biopsied muscle tissue from human LEMS patients showed a decrease in the number of presynaptic AZs and a disorganization of particles in the remaining AZs (Figure 3) [73]. Similar results were found using freeze fracture electron microscopy in presynaptic terminals of LEMS-model mouse NMJs [9,10]. This disruption of the AZ structure was interpreted to be due to the antibody-mediated loss of P/Q-type VGCCs, which could explain the muscle weakness seen in LEMS patients. This hypothesis is further supported by evidence that the P/Q-type calcium current in LEMS mice is 30–40% less than in controls [66,74]. However, the lateral displacement of the remaining P/Q-type calcium channels may cause a further reduction in transmitter release, as the movement of VGCCs away from the calcium-sensing protein reduces their effectiveness. Therefore, disruptions in AZ organization may also play an important role in LEMS pathophysiology.
Blocking the P/Q-type VGCCs in a healthy mouse NMJ will normally completely block neurotransmitter release [76,77], suggesting that under healthy conditions, P/Q-type VGCCs are the only type of VGCC close enough to the vesicles in the AZ to induce transmitter release. However, in LEMS mice, other VGCC types (primarily L-type) were found to contribute to transmitter release [66,74,78]. This is generally thought to be a compensatory attempt by the motoneuron to increase transmitter release by overexpressing VGCC types. Despite this compensation, LEMS mouse NMJs release 60–75% less neurotransmitter than healthy controls [9,78,79,80,81]. Since L-type VCGGs do not contain the synaptic protein interaction (synprint) site that is necessary to associate with AZs, they are likely positioned outside of the AZ [82,83,84]. Indeed, preliminary experiments on LEMS passive-transfer mice found that the contribution of the L-type channel to the release of transmitters is blocked by the addition of low concentrations of the fast-acting calcium buffer BAPTA (1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid), suggesting that the L-type channels are not within close proximity to the calcium-sensing proteins in the AZs [85].
Interestingly, the injection of serum into mice from LEMS patients without detectable P/Q-type antibodies was successful in passively transferring LEMS symptoms to these mice, indicating that seronegative LEMS antibodies can still mediate the passive transfer of disease symptoms [86]. Furthermore, anti-VGCC antibody titers were not found to be predictive of long-term disease outcomes [87]. Therefore, LEMS auto-antibodies are likely to target antigens other than simply P/Q-type VGCCs, and the effects of these other antigens (i.e., synaptotagmin and muscarinic receptors; [68,71]) may contribute to the pathophysiology of LEMS.

8. Conclusions and Future Directions

There remains limited information on the structure and function of AZs within human NMJs. The few reports that have been published document that human NMJs are smaller than mouse NMJs, but possess many of the same features, proteins, and overall organization [88,89]. The development of mouse AZ models provides the background for exploring neurological disease states, and the pathophysiology of LEMS lends itself to exploration using MCell models. LEMS is often characterized as a disease of presynaptic VGCCs [66,74]. However, because it is known that other AZ changes occur in LEMS, including disruptions in the organization and alignment of AZ proteins [10], a compensatory upregulation of L-type VGCC subtypes outside of the AZs [74,78], and a reduction in the number of AZs [9], MCell modeling will be a useful tool to explore the impact of these changes (see Figure 4). If AZ changes beyond the removal of VGCCs from the AZ were to be implicated in LEMS pathophysiology, an in-depth characterization of autoantibody diversity in LEMS patient serum would be warranted, as well as super-resolution microscopy of the disruption of other proteins in LEMS-modified AZs. LEMS presents a unique opportunity to better understand the AZ structure and function in a pathological framework. A detailed understanding with regard to the range of autoantibodies generated across a range of patients and their impact on AZs is still required, as well as an investigation of the specific changes in AZs that lead to particular features of LEMS. In both healthy and diseased states, a more detailed understanding of the relationships between AZ composition, AZ organization, and synaptic functions would be beneficial.
Beyond pathological studies of neurological disease, basic questions remain. Many years of studying the mammalian NMJ AZ have led to an appreciation for some of the proteins that are expressed, and the functional consequences of the highly ordered structure of this transmitter release site. It is now clear that the strength and reliability of the neuromuscular synapses derive from the collective function of a very large number of individual release sites. However, there remain several very important unresolved issues. These include (1) how different individual AZs contribute to transmitter release under different conditions—both physiological and pathological, (2) a more detailed understanding of the specific proteins that underlie the ordered structure revealed by electron microscopy tomography studies, and (3) a better understanding of the potential heterogeneity in the protein make-up of individual AZs that might lead to heterogeneity in function.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.P.G., Y.B., T.B.T. and S.D.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation: S.P.G., Y.B. and S.D.M.; Writing—Reviewing and Editing Y.B. and T.B.T.; Supervision: S.D.M.; Project Administration: S.D.M.; Funding Acquisition: S.D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant #2011648 to SDM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meriney, S.D.; Dittrich, M. Organization and function of transmitter release sites at the neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 3159–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wood, S.J.; Slater, C.R. Safety factor at the neuromuscular junction. Prog. Neurobiol. 2001, 64, 393–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sudhof, T.C. The presynaptic active zone. Neuron 2012, 75, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kochubey, O.; Lou, X.; Schneggenburger, R. Regulation of transmitter release by Ca2+ and synaptotagmin: Insights from a large CNS synapse. Trends Neurosci. 2011, 34, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Laghaei, R.; Ma, J.; Tarr, T.B.; Homan, A.E.; Kelly, L.S.; Tilvawala, M.S.; Vuocolo, B.S.; Rajasekaran, H.P.; Meriney, S.D.; Dittrich, M. Transmitter release site organization can predict synaptic function at the neuromuscular junction. J. Neurophysiol. 2018, 119, 1340–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kress, G.; Mennerick, S. Action potential initiation and propagation: Upstream influences on neurotransmission. Neuroscience 2009, 158, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Vincent, A.; Lang, B.; Newsom-Davis, J. Autoimmunity to the voltage-gated calcium channel underlies the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, a paraneoplastic disorder. Trends Neurosci. 1989, 12, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Titulaer, M.J.; Lang, B.; Verschuuren, J. Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: From clinical characteristics to therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fukunaga, H.; Engel, A.G.; Lang, B.; Newsom-Davis, J.; Vincent, A. Passive transfer of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome with IgG from man to mouse depletes the presynaptic membrane active zones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 7636–7640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fukuoka, T.; Engel, A.G.; Lang, B.; Newsom-Davis, J.; Prior, C.; W-Wray, D. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: I. Early morphological effects of IgG on the presynaptic membrane active zones. Ann. Neurol. 1987, 22, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tarr, T.B.; Wipf, P.; Meriney, S.D. Synaptic Pathophysiology and Treatment of Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome. Mol. Neurobiol. 2014, 52, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Rowan, M.J.; DelCanto, G.; Yu, J.J.; Kamasawa, N.; Christie, J.M. Synapse-Level Determination of Action Potential Duration by K+ Channel Clustering in Axons. Neuron 2016, 91, 370–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Burkitt, A.N. A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input. Biol. Cybern. 2006, 95, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lapicque, L. Quantitative investigations of electrical nerve excitation treated as polarization. Biol. Cybern. 2007, 97, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F. Resting and action potentials in single nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 1945, 104, 176–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F. Propagation of electrical signals along giant nerve fibres. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1952, 140, 177–183. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 1952, 117, 500–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F. The dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Loligo. J. Physiol. 1952, 116, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F. The components of membrane conductance in the giant axon of Loligo. J. Physiol. 1952, 116, 473–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F. Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J. Physiol. 1952, 116, 449–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F.; Katz, B. Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J. Physiol. 1952, 116, 424–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bean, B.P. The action potential in mammalian central neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hoppa, M.B.; Gouzer, G.; Armbruster, M.; Ryan, T.A. Control and Plasticity of the Presynaptic Action Potential Waveform at Small CNS Nerve Terminals. Neuron 2014, 84, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Popovic, M.A.; Foust, A.; McCormick, D.A.; Zecevic, D. The spatio-temporal characteristics of action potential initiation in layer 5 pyramidal neurons: A voltage imaging study. J. Physiol. 2011, 589, 4167–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ginebaugh, S.P.; Cyphers, E.D.; Lanka, V.; Ortiz, G.; Miller, E.W.; Laghaei, R.; Meriney, S.D. The Frog Motor Nerve Terminal Has Very Brief Action Potentials and Three Electrical Regions Predicted to Differentially Control Transmitter Release. J. Neurosci. 2020, 40, 3504–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ojala, K.S.; Ginebaugh, S.P.; Wu, M.; Miller, E.W.; Ortiz, G.; Covarrubias, M.; Meriney, S.D. A high-affinity, partial antagonist effect of 3,4-diaminopyridine mediates action potential broadening and enhancement of transmitter release at NMJs. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brooke, R.E.; Moores, T.S.; Morris, N.P.; Parson, S.; Deuchars, J. Kv3 voltage-gated potassium channels regulate neurotransmitter release from mouse motor nerve terminals. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20, 3313–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Flink, M.T.; Atchison, W.D. Iberiotoxin-Induced Block of Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels Induces Dihydropyridine Sensitivity of ACh Release from Mammalian Motor Nerve Terminals. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 305, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Luo, F.; Dittrich, M.; Stiles, J.R.; Meriney, S.D. Single-Pixel Optical Fluctuation Analysis of Calcium Channel Function in Active Zones of Motor Nerve Terminals. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 11268–11281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luo, F.; Dittrich, M.; Cho, S.; Stiles, J.R.; Meriney, S.D. Transmitter release is evoked with low probability predominately by calcium flux through single channel openings at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Neurophysiol. 2014, 113, 2480–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tarr, T.B.; Dittrich, M.; Meriney, S.D. Are unreliable release mechanisms conserved from NMJ to CNS? Trends Neurosci. 2013, 36, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Couteaux, R.; Pecot-Dechavassine, M. Synaptic vesicles and pouches at the level of “active zones” of the neuromuscular junction. Comptes Rendus Hebd. Des Seances De L’academie Des Sci. Ser. D Sci. Nat. 1970, 271, 2346–2349. [Google Scholar]
  33. Heuser, J.E.; Reese, T.S.; Landis, D.M.D. Functional changes in frog neuromuscular junctions studied with freeze-fracture. J. Neurocytol. 1974, 3, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peper, K.; Dreyer, F.; Sandri, C.; Akert, K.; Moor, H. Structure and ultrastructure of the frog motor endplate. Cell Tissue Res. 1974, 149, 437–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pfenninger, K.; Akert, K.; Moor, H.; Sandri, C. The fine structure of freeze-fractured presynaptic membranes. J. Neurocytol. 1972, 1, 129–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nagwaney, S.; Harlow, M.L.; Jung, J.H.; Szule, J.A.; Ress, D.; Xu, J.; Marshall, R.M.; McMahan, U.J. Macromolecular connections of active zone material to docked synaptic vesicles and presynaptic membrane at neuromuscular junctions of mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 2009, 513, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ruiz, R.; Cano, R.; Casañas, J.J.; Gaffield, M.A.; Betz, W.J.; Tabares, L. Active Zones and the Readily Releasable Pool of Synaptic Vesicles at the Neuromuscular Junction of the Mouse. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 2000–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chen, J.; Mizushige, T.; Nishimune, H. Active zone density is conserved during synaptic growth but impaired in aged mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 2011, 520, 434–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nishimune, H.; Badawi, Y.; Mori, S.; Shigemoto, K. Dual-color STED microscopy reveals a sandwich structure of Bassoon and Piccolo in active zones of adult and aged mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Chen, J.; Billings, S.E.; Nishimune, H. Calcium channels link the muscle-derived synapse organizer laminin β2 to Bassoon and CAST/Erc2 to organize presynaptic active zones. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 512–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Marques, M.J.; Conchello, J.-A.; Lichtman, J.W. From Plaque to Pretzel: Fold Formation and Acetylcholine Receptor Loss at the Developing Neuromuscular Junction. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 3663–3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Patton, B.L.; Cunningham, J.M.; Thyboll, J.; Kortesmaa, J.; Westerblad, H.; Edström, L.; Tryggvason, K.; Sanes, J.R. Properly formed but improperly localized synaptic specializations in the absence of laminin α4. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gundelfinger, E.D.; Reissner, C.; Garner, C.C. Role of Bassoon and Piccolo in Assembly and Molecular Organization of the Active Zone. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2016, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Mukherjee, K.; Yang, X.; Gerber, S.H.; Kwon, H.-B.; Ho, A.; Castillo, P.E.; Liu, X.; Südhof, T.C. Piccolo and bassoon maintain synaptic vesicle clustering without directly participating in vesicle exocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 6504–6509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Dieck, S.T.; Sanmartí-Vila, L.; Langnaese, K.; Richter, K.; Kindler, S.; Soyke, A.; Wex, H.; Smalla, K.-H.; Kämpf, U.; Fränzer, J.-T.; et al. Bassoon, a Novel Zinc-finger CAG/Glutamine-repeat Protein Selectively Localized at the Active Zone of Presynaptic Nerve Terminals. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Cases-Langhoff, C.; Voss, B.; Garner, A.M.; Appeltauer, U.; Takei, K.; Kindler, S.; Veh, R.W.; De Camilli, P.; Gundelfinger, E.D.; Garner, C. Piccolo, a novel 420 kDa protein associated with the presynaptic cytomatrix. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 69, 214–223. [Google Scholar]
  47. Badawi, Y.; Nishimune, H. Presynaptic active zones of mammalian neuromuscular junctions: Nanoarchitecture and selective impairments in aging. Neurosci. Res. 2017, 127, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Szule, J.A. Hypothesis Relating the Structure, Biochemistry and Function of Active Zone Material Macromolecules at a Neuromuscular Junction. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2022, 13, 798225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhai, R.; Bellen, H. The Architecture of the Active Zone in the Presynaptic Nerve Terminal. Physiology 2004, 19, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Propst, J.; Ko, C. Correlations between active zone ultrastructure and synaptic function studied with freeze-fracture of physiologically identified neuromuscular junctions. J. Neurosci. 1987, 7, 3654–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Herrera, A.; Grinnell, A.; Wolowske, B. Ultrastructural correlates of experimentally altered transmitter release efficacy in frog motor nerve terminals. Neuroscience 1985, 16, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Herrera, A.A.; Grinnell, A.D. Contralateral denervation causes enhanced transmitter release from frog motor nerve terminals. Nature 1981, 291, 495–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Meriney, S.D.; Wolowske, B.; Ezzati, E.; Grinnell, A.D. Low calcium-induced disruption of active zone structure and function at the frog neuromuscular junction. Synapse 1996, 24, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bartol, T.; Land, B.; Salpeter, E.; Salpeter, M. Monte Carlo simulation of miniature endplate current generation in the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Biophys. J. 1991, 59, 1290–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Kerr, R.A.; Bartol, T.M.; Kaminsky, B.; Dittrich, M.; Chang, J.-C.J.; Baden, S.B.; Sejnowski, T.J.; Stiles, J.R. Fast Monte Carlo Simulation Methods for Biological Reaction-Diffusion Systems in Solution and on Surfaces. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2008, 30, 3126–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Stiles, J.R.; Van Helden, D.; Bartol, T.M.; E Salpeter, E.; Salpeter, M.M. Miniature endplate current rise times less than 100 microseconds from improved dual recordings can be modeled with passive acetylcholine diffusion from a synaptic vesicle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5747–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Homan, A.E.; Laghaei, R.; Dittrich, M.; Meriney, S.D. Impact of spatiotemporal calcium dynamics within presynaptic active zones on synaptic delay at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Neurophysiol. 2018, 119, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dittrich, M.; Pattillo, J.M.; King, J.D.; Cho, S.; Stiles, J.R.; Meriney, S.D. An Excess-Calcium-Binding-Site Model Predicts Neurotransmitter Release at the Neuromuscular Junction. Biophys. J. 2013, 104, 2751–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ma, J.; Kelly, L.; Ingram, J.; Price, T.J.; Meriney, S.D.; Dittrich, M. New insights into short-term synaptic facilitation at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Neurophysiol. 2015, 113, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Titulaer, M.J.; Maddison, P.; Sont, J.K.; Wirtz, P.W.; Hilton-Jones, D.; Klooster, R.; Willcox, N.; Potman, M.; Smitt, P.A.S.; Kuks, J.B.M.; et al. Clinical Dutch-English Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) Tumor Association Prediction Score Accurately Predicts Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the LEMS. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 902–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wirtz, P.W.; Smallegange, T.M.; Wintzen, A.R.; Verschuuren, J. Differences in clinical features between the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome with and without cancer: An analysis of 227 published cases. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2002, 104, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Titulaer, M.J.; Verschuuren, J.J. Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: Tumor versus nontumor forms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1132, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kalemkerian, G.P.; Akerley, W.; Bogner, P.; Borghaei, H.; Chow, L.Q.; Downey, R.J.; Hughes, M. Non–small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2013, 11, 78–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. David, P.; El Far, O.; Martin-Mouto, N.; Poupon, M.F.; Takahashi, M.; Seagar, M.J. Expression of synaptotagmin and syntaxin associated with N-type calcium channels in small cell lung cancer. FEBS Lett. 1993, 326, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Roberts, A.; Perera, S.; Lang, B.; Vincent, A.; Newsom-Davis, J. Paraneoplastic myasthenic syndrome IgG inhibits 45Ca2+ flux in a human small cell carcinoma line. Nature 1985, 317, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Smith, D.O.; Conklin, M.W.; Jensen, P.J.; Atchison, W.D. Decreased calcium currents in motor nerve terminals of mice with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. J. Physiol. 1995, 487, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Motomura, M.; Lang, B.; Johnston, I.; Palace, J.; Vincent, A.; Newsom-Davis, J. Incidence of serum anti-P/O-type and anti-N-type calcium channel autoantibodies in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. J. Neurol. Sci. 1997, 147, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Takamori, M.; Takahashi, M.; Yasukawa, Y.; Iwasa, K.; Nemoto, Y.; Suenaga, A.; Nagataki, S.; Nakamura, T. Antibodies to recombinant synaptotagmin and calcium channel subtypes in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. J. Neurol. Sci. 1995, 133, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lennon, V.A.; Kryzer, T.J.; Griesmann, G.E.; O’Suilleabhain, P.; Windebank, A.J.; Woppmann, A.; Miljanich, G.P.; Lambert, E.H. Calcium-Channel Antibodies in the Lambert–Eaton Syndrome and Other Paraneoplastic Syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 332, 1467–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kesner, V.G.; Oh, S.J.; Dimachkie, M.M.; Barohn, R.J. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Neurol. Clin. 2018, 36, 379–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Takamori, M. Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: Search for alternative autoimmune targets and possible compensatory mechanisms based on presynaptic calcium homeostasis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008, 201–202, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lang, B.; Molenaar, P.C.; Newsom-Davis, J.; Vincent, A. Passive Transfer of Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome in Mice: Decreased Rates of Resting and Evoked Release of Acetylcholine from Skeletal Muscle. J. Neurochem. 1984, 42, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fukunaga, H.; Engel, A.G.; Osame, M.; Lambert, E.H. Paucity and disorganization of presynaptic membrane active zones in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1982, 5, 686–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, Y.F.; Hewett, S.J.; Atchison, W.D. Passive transfer of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome induces dihydropyridine sensitivity of ICa in mouse motor nerve terminals. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 80, 1056–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Nagel, A.; Engel, A.G.; Lang, B.; Newsom-Davis, J.; Fukuoka, T. Lambert-eaton myasthenic syndrome IgG depletes presynaptic membrane active zone particles by antigenic modulation. Ann. Neurol. 1988, 24, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Uchitel, O.D.; A Protti, D.; Sanchez, V.; Cherksey, B.D.; Sugimori, M.; Llinás, R. P-type voltage-dependent calcium channel mediates presynaptic calcium influx and transmitter release in mammalian synapses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 3330–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Katz, E.; Ferro, P.A.; Weisz, G.; Uchitel, O. Calcium channels involved in synaptic transmission at the mature and regenerating mouse neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 1996, 497, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Flink, M.T.; Atchison, W.D. Passive transfer of Lambert-Eaton syndrome to mice induces dihydropyridine sensitivity of neuromuscular transmission. J. Physiol. 2002, 543, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lang, B.; Newsom-Davis, J.; Prior, C.; Wray, D. Antibodies to motor nerve terminals: An electrophysiological study of a human myasthenic syndrome transferred to mouse. J. Physiol. 1983, 344, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tarr, T.B.; Lacomis, D.; Reddel, S.W.; Liang, M.; Valdomir, G.; Frasso, M.; Wipf, P.; Meriney, S.D. Complete reversal of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome synaptic impairment by the combined use of a K+ channel blocker and a Ca2+ channel agonist. J. Physiol. 2014, 592, 3687–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tarr, T.B.; Malick, W.; Liang, M.; Valdomir, G.; Frasso, M.; Lacomis, D.; Reddel, S.W.; Garcia-Ocano, A.; Wipf, P.; Meriney, S.D. Evaluation of a novel calcium channel agonist for therapeutic potential in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 10559–10567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Catterall, W.A. Interactions of Presynaptic Ca2+ Channels and Snare Proteins in Neurotransmitter Release. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 868, 144–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mochida, S.; Westenbroek, R.E.; Yokoyama, C.T.; Zhong, H.; Myers, S.J.; Scheuer, T.; Itoh, K.; Catterall, W.A. Requirement for the synaptic protein interaction site for reconstitution of synaptic transmission by P/Q-type calcium channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 2819–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Sheng, Z.-H.; Westenbroek, R.E.; Catterall, W.A. Physical Link and Functional Coupling of Presynaptic Calcium Channels and the Synaptic Vesicle Docking/Fusion Machinery. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1998, 30, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Flink, M.T. The role of L-type calcium ion channels in release of acetylcholine from motor nerve terminals following passive transfer of lambert-eaton myasthenic syndrome to mature mice. In Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology; Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2003; p. 235. [Google Scholar]
  86. Nakao, Y.K.; Motomura, M.; Fukudome, T.; Fukuda, T.; Shiraishi, H.; Yoshimura, T.; Tsujihata, M.; Eguchi, K. Seronegative Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: Study of 110 Japanese patients. Neurology 2002, 59, 1773–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Maddison, P.; Lang, B.; Mills, K.; Newsom-Davis, J. Long term outcome in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome without lung cancer. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2001, 70, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Slater, C.R. The Structure of Human Neuromuscular Junctions: Some Unanswered Molecular Questions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jones, R.A.; Harrison, C.; Eaton, S.L.; Hurtado, M.L.; Graham, L.C.; Alkhammash, L.; Oladiran, O.A.; Gale, A.; Lamont, D.J.; Simpson, H.; et al. Cellular and Molecular Anatomy of the Human Neuromuscular Junction. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 2348–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 12 00740 g001 550
Figure 1. The presynaptic AP waveform at the mouse NMJ is very brief. (A) BeRST 1 dye-stained image of a mammalian presynaptic motor nerve terminal. (B) Alexa Fluor 488 α-BTX stained image of the same terminal as in A. (C) normalized spline of the average presynaptic AP waveform recorded from 11 mouse motor nerve terminals. Adapted from Ojala et al. [26].
Figure 1. The presynaptic AP waveform at the mouse NMJ is very brief. (A) BeRST 1 dye-stained image of a mammalian presynaptic motor nerve terminal. (B) Alexa Fluor 488 α-BTX stained image of the same terminal as in A. (C) normalized spline of the average presynaptic AP waveform recorded from 11 mouse motor nerve terminals. Adapted from Ojala et al. [26].
Biomolecules 12 00740 g001
Biomolecules 12 00740 g002 550
Figure 2. The structure and protein distribution of mouse NMJ AZs. (A) A mouse NMJ stained with Alexa-594 α-bungarotoxin (BTX; red) to demonstrate the shape of the NMJ and an Alexa-488 conjugated antibody to identify the bassoon protein the AZs (BSN; green). Inset shows an enlargement of one part of the NMJ to make it easier to visualize the distribution of AZs (green spots). Image adapted from [5]. (B) A freeze-fracture replica of an AZ from a mouse NMJ. The hypothesized locations of synaptic vesicles are superimposed as white circles. Scale bar = 50 nm. Adapted from [10,36]. (C) Diagram of a single AZ from a mouse NMJ based on electron microscope tomography data [36]. Diagram shows docked synaptic vesicles (gray spheres), along with AZ structures termed “pegs” (orange), “beams” (purple), and “ribs” (green). (D) The distribution of the AZ proteins bassoon (green) and P/Q-type VGCCs (magenta) at the mouse NMJ as revealed by STED super-resolution microscopy. (E) The distribution of the AZ proteins bassoon (green) and piccolo (magenta) at the mouse NMJ as revealed by STED super resolution microscopy. (F) A combined proposed overlay of all three AZ proteins (Bassoon, Piccolo, and P/Q-type VGCCs) onto the AZ fine structure based on STED super-resolution imaging. These data lead to the hypothesis that the “pegs” identified in electron microscopy tomography models from panel C represent P/Q-type VGCCs (orange), the “ribs” represent Bassoon (green), and the “beams” represent Piccolo (purple). C-F are adapted from [39] (G) The distribution of quantal content values determined from a population of mouse NMJs. Inset shows a sample miniature endplate current (mEPC; left) and a sample AP-triggered endplate current (EPC; right). (H) The distribution of AZ numbers counted from a population of mouse NMJs. Adapted from [5].
Figure 2. The structure and protein distribution of mouse NMJ AZs. (A) A mouse NMJ stained with Alexa-594 α-bungarotoxin (BTX; red) to demonstrate the shape of the NMJ and an Alexa-488 conjugated antibody to identify the bassoon protein the AZs (BSN; green). Inset shows an enlargement of one part of the NMJ to make it easier to visualize the distribution of AZs (green spots). Image adapted from [5]. (B) A freeze-fracture replica of an AZ from a mouse NMJ. The hypothesized locations of synaptic vesicles are superimposed as white circles. Scale bar = 50 nm. Adapted from [10,36]. (C) Diagram of a single AZ from a mouse NMJ based on electron microscope tomography data [36]. Diagram shows docked synaptic vesicles (gray spheres), along with AZ structures termed “pegs” (orange), “beams” (purple), and “ribs” (green). (D) The distribution of the AZ proteins bassoon (green) and P/Q-type VGCCs (magenta) at the mouse NMJ as revealed by STED super-resolution microscopy. (E) The distribution of the AZ proteins bassoon (green) and piccolo (magenta) at the mouse NMJ as revealed by STED super resolution microscopy. (F) A combined proposed overlay of all three AZ proteins (Bassoon, Piccolo, and P/Q-type VGCCs) onto the AZ fine structure based on STED super-resolution imaging. These data lead to the hypothesis that the “pegs” identified in electron microscopy tomography models from panel C represent P/Q-type VGCCs (orange), the “ribs” represent Bassoon (green), and the “beams” represent Piccolo (purple). C-F are adapted from [39] (G) The distribution of quantal content values determined from a population of mouse NMJs. Inset shows a sample miniature endplate current (mEPC; left) and a sample AP-triggered endplate current (EPC; right). (H) The distribution of AZ numbers counted from a population of mouse NMJs. Adapted from [5].
Biomolecules 12 00740 g002
Biomolecules 12 00740 g003 550
Figure 3. Freeze fracture of control and LEMS NMJs AZs showing AZ disruption after LEMS passive transfer to mice. (A) Representative control mouse AZ organization (left: diagram, right: freeze fracture replica, scale = 50 nm). (B) Representative LEMS-modified AZ organization (left: diagram of protein organization, right: two example AZs from nerve terminals of mice passively transferred with LEMS serum) Adapted from Nagel et al. [75]; Fukuoka et al. [10]; Fukunaga et al. [9].
Figure 3. Freeze fracture of control and LEMS NMJs AZs showing AZ disruption after LEMS passive transfer to mice. (A) Representative control mouse AZ organization (left: diagram, right: freeze fracture replica, scale = 50 nm). (B) Representative LEMS-modified AZ organization (left: diagram of protein organization, right: two example AZs from nerve terminals of mice passively transferred with LEMS serum) Adapted from Nagel et al. [75]; Fukuoka et al. [10]; Fukunaga et al. [9].
Biomolecules 12 00740 g003
Biomolecules 12 00740 g004 550
Figure 4. Diagrams of MCell models that can be constructed of mouse AZs in healthy and LEMS conditions. (A) Diagram of a mouse NMJ MCell model environment that contains 6 AZs. The 3-dimensional enclosure depicts a portion of the motor nerve terminal with black spheres representing docked synaptic vesicles within each AZ. Dots adjacent to the docked synaptic vesicles represent AZ proteins (gray dots) and P/Q-type VGCCs (black dots). (B) Diagram of a hypothesized healthy AZ based on predictions for the number and position of docked synaptic vesicles (blue spheres), P/Q VGCCs (red circles), calcium-activated potassium channels (yellow circles), and other unknown AZ proteins (white circles). (C) Diagram of a hypothesized LEMS AZ based on predictions for the number and position of docked synaptic vesicles (blue spheres), P/Q VGCCs (red circles), calcium-activated potassium channels (yellow circles), L-type VGCCs (green circles), and other unknown AZ proteins (white circles). Panel A is modified from Laghaei et al. [5].
Figure 4. Diagrams of MCell models that can be constructed of mouse AZs in healthy and LEMS conditions. (A) Diagram of a mouse NMJ MCell model environment that contains 6 AZs. The 3-dimensional enclosure depicts a portion of the motor nerve terminal with black spheres representing docked synaptic vesicles within each AZ. Dots adjacent to the docked synaptic vesicles represent AZ proteins (gray dots) and P/Q-type VGCCs (black dots). (B) Diagram of a hypothesized healthy AZ based on predictions for the number and position of docked synaptic vesicles (blue spheres), P/Q VGCCs (red circles), calcium-activated potassium channels (yellow circles), and other unknown AZ proteins (white circles). (C) Diagram of a hypothesized LEMS AZ based on predictions for the number and position of docked synaptic vesicles (blue spheres), P/Q VGCCs (red circles), calcium-activated potassium channels (yellow circles), L-type VGCCs (green circles), and other unknown AZ proteins (white circles). Panel A is modified from Laghaei et al. [5].
Biomolecules 12 00740 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ginebaugh, S.P.; Badawi, Y.; Tarr, T.B.; Meriney, S.D. Neuromuscular Active Zone Structure and Function in Healthy and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome States. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12060740

AMA Style

Ginebaugh SP, Badawi Y, Tarr TB, Meriney SD. Neuromuscular Active Zone Structure and Function in Healthy and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome States. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(6):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12060740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ginebaugh, Scott P., Yomna Badawi, Tyler B. Tarr, and Stephen D. Meriney. 2022. "Neuromuscular Active Zone Structure and Function in Healthy and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome States" Biomolecules 12, no. 6: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12060740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop