Next Article in Journal
A Standard Protocol for the Calibration of Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) Equipment
Previous Article in Journal
Simple, Rapid and Validated LC Determination of Lopinavir in Rat Plasma and its Application in Pharmacokinetic Studies
 
 
Scientia Pharmaceutica is published by MDPI from Volume 84 Issue 3 (2016). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Austrian Pharmaceutical Society (Österreichische Pharmazeutische Gesellschaft, ÖPhG).
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Sensitive and Simple HPLC-UV Method for Trace Level Quantification of Ethyl p-Toluenesulfonate and Methyl p-Toluenesulfonate, Two Potential Genotoxins in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

by
Amasa NAGESWARI
1,2,*,
Kallam VENKATA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY
2 and
Khagga MUKKANTI
1
1
Center of Pharmaceutical Sciences, IST, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, 500072, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, India
2
Aptuit Laurus Private Limited, ICICI knowledge park, 500078, Turkapally, Hyderabad, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sci. Pharm. 2011, 79(4), 865-876; https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1106-23
Submission received: 27 June 2011 / Accepted: 20 September 2011 / Published: 20 September 2011

Abstract

A sensitive and simple HPLC/UV method has been developed and validated for the determination of two potential genotoxic impurities, namely methyl p-toluenesulfonate (MPTS) and ethyl p-toluenesulfonate (EPTS) at trace levels in Pemetrexed sodium API. Applying the concept of threshold of toxicological concern (TTC), a limit of 3 ppm each for both genotoxins was calculated based on the maximum daily dose of API. A reversed phase LC method using UV detection was developed and validated. The method was found to be specific and selective for the application. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for both MPTS and EPTS was found to be 0.15 ppm (0.009 μg mL−1) and 0.5 ppm (0.03 μg mL−1), respectively, with respect to sample concentration. The calibration curves of MPTS and EPTS were linear over the concentration range from LOQ to 6 μg/mL. The method was found to be specific, precise, linear and accurate and has been successfully applied to determine the two genotoxins in commercial batches of the API.
Keywords: Threshold of toxicological concern; Genotoxin; Daily dosage; Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient; Validation Threshold of toxicological concern; Genotoxin; Daily dosage; Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient; Validation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

NAGESWARI, A.; VENKATA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, K.; MUKKANTI, K. A Sensitive and Simple HPLC-UV Method for Trace Level Quantification of Ethyl p-Toluenesulfonate and Methyl p-Toluenesulfonate, Two Potential Genotoxins in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Sci. Pharm. 2011, 79, 865-876. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1106-23

AMA Style

NAGESWARI A, VENKATA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY K, MUKKANTI K. A Sensitive and Simple HPLC-UV Method for Trace Level Quantification of Ethyl p-Toluenesulfonate and Methyl p-Toluenesulfonate, Two Potential Genotoxins in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2011; 79(4):865-876. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1106-23

Chicago/Turabian Style

NAGESWARI, Amasa, Kallam VENKATA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, and Khagga MUKKANTI. 2011. "A Sensitive and Simple HPLC-UV Method for Trace Level Quantification of Ethyl p-Toluenesulfonate and Methyl p-Toluenesulfonate, Two Potential Genotoxins in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients" Scientia Pharmaceutica 79, no. 4: 865-876. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1106-23

APA Style

NAGESWARI, A., VENKATA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, K., & MUKKANTI, K. (2011). A Sensitive and Simple HPLC-UV Method for Trace Level Quantification of Ethyl p-Toluenesulfonate and Methyl p-Toluenesulfonate, Two Potential Genotoxins in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 79(4), 865-876. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1106-23

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop