Next Article in Journal
Platform business Eco-model evolution: case study on KakaoTalk in Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Study on CEO characteristics for management of public art performance centers
Article Menu

Article Versions

Export Article

Open AccessCase Report
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3(1), 1; (registering DOI)

Sources of scientific creativity: participant observation of a public research institute in Korea

Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT), Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-600, South Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 4 August 2016 / Accepted: 29 September 2016 / Published: 17 January 2017
PDF [712 KB, uploaded 8 February 2018]


This study aims to find the factors of scientists' creative thoughts by observing directly their laboratories in Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT). The participant observation was performed for 5 months from December 2013 through April 2014, and the research object was the lab which had been selected both as Top KRICT laboratory and Top National R&D Project. For in-depth examination, the target lab was supposed to be observed for a long time, taking part in the lab meetings, interviewing the researchers. From the interview data, Protocol analysis or Verbal data analysis was employed to analyze the recorded data. The research results are as follows. First, as several studies had suggested, the frequent use of analogies was verified as an important source for scientists' creative thoughts, in that those analogies were used for 12 times in 2 lab meetings, which was 6 times per each. Secondly, the frequent appearance of unexpected findings was found, that is, 8 out of 15 experiment findings were unexpected. We found that the scientists pay close attention to the unexpected findings in that 67 out of 88 intra-group interactions were about the unexpected findings, and 21 out of 24 individual reasoningblocks were about the unexpected findings. Finally, we found that the seeds of new knowledge and ideas sprouted and spread through the distributed reasoning process, which is the major characteristic of modern science that is generally conducted by group of scientists. The findings have two theoretical implications. First, it may increase the availability of Ikujiro Nonaka's knowledge-creation model by adding another case study. It may also contribute to balance between supply-side and demand-side perspective of Innovation. System studies by supplementing supply-side perspective.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, Y.; Ko, Y. Sources of scientific creativity: participant observation of a public research institute in Korea. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3, 1.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. EISSN 2199-8531 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top