Next Article in Journal
Relation between the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score and Muscle Strength in Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Evidence-Based Disease Education Literature for Pakistani Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Evolution of Pediatric Disease—A Moving Target in Public Health
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperComment
Diseases 2017, 5(4), 28;

Risk Evaluation Requires an Independent Mind

Fraunhofer Institute Applied Polymer Research (IAP), Division of Life Science and Bioprocesses, Department of Biomaterials and Healthcare, Potsdam-Golm 14476, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 13 November 2017 / Revised: 21 November 2017 / Accepted: 21 November 2017 / Published: 24 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pediatric Diseases)
Full-Text   |   PDF [149 KB, uploaded 27 November 2017]


Biomedical research pertaining to pathologies observed in adolescents can involve areas where patients can expect no immediate benefits. Here, Congress stipulates that local review boards are restricted to approving procedures posing no greater than minimal risk (45 CFR 46.404). An evaluation of risk embraces the current state of the art with regard to the safety and efficacy of procedures. A tendency of biomedical scholars to cite highly cited documents can introduce a bias in an argumentation in favor or against a given recommendation in the context that bias in citations can be correlated with an imprudent use of funds for research. We use choice examples to highlight the necessity of approaching any scholarly task with an independent mind. View Full-Text
Keywords: Risk assessment; bias; research Risk assessment; bias; research
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmidt, C.; Storsberg, J. Risk Evaluation Requires an Independent Mind. Diseases 2017, 5, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Diseases EISSN 2079-9721 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top