Three-Dimensional Digitization of Documentation and Perpetual Preservation of Cultural Heritage Buildings at Risk of Liquidation and Loss—The Methodology and Case Study of St Adalbert’s Church in Chicago
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
- At the object level;
- Laser scanning assisted photogrammetry;
- Photogrammetry-assisted laser scanning;
- Closely integrated laser scanning and optical imaging.
3. Motivation
3.1. Historical and Social Context
3.2. Archiving and Dissemination Context
3.3. The Project
- The first: IT specialists from the Lublin University of Technology, Poland (Department of Computer Science, Lab3D Laboratory);
- The second: historians from the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland (Centre for Research on Polish Diaspora and Chaplaincy Polonia).
- The first scientific expedition to the US during 9–23 October 2022;
- The second scientific expedition to the US during 26 June–10 July 2023.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Historical Description of St Adalbert’s Church in Chicago, the USA
4.2. Digitization Methods and Process
- General Plan Photos (GPP)—photographs showing 0.4–0.8 of the area of the entire facility. They enable easy assembly of photos using the photogrammetry method. Photography is taken at a focal length of 15 to 30 mm.
- Medium Plan Photos (MPP)—photos containing a fragment of an object. These photographs are taken from a sufficiently close distance and at a sufficiently high resolution to enable the correct reconstruction of the shape and appearance of the object with the required level of detail. These photos are positioned (registered) based on an already existing rough 3D digital models built from GPP. Photographing is performed at a focal length of 30 to 50 mm.
- Detailed Photos (DP)—photos containing individual details. They enable the transfer of good and very good quality textures to 3D digital models. Photographing is performed at a focal length of 70 to 200 mm.
- Cloud downloading (with conversion of the spherical coordinate system to Cartesian);
- Coloring the cloud points based on photos taken by the scanner;
- Cloud registration (including conversion of the coordinates of points of various clouds to one coordinate system);
- Cleaning the point clouds of unnecessary objects (e.g., people) and incorrect coloring;
- Exporting cleaned clouds of individual scans;
- Creating a base cloud by combining the clouds into one.
- e57—an independent, extensible industry standard for recording 3D imaging data developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials and specified in ASTM E2807 [46];
- ptx—an ASCII-based format for saving point cloud data, typically from LIDAR scanners, used as intermediate data transfer between Scene and RealityCapture;
- glb—a standardized file format used to share 3D data, with all assets (3D mesh and textures) stored in a one binary file.
4.3. 3D Scanning of St Adalbert’s Church Interior
- Facility availability time: 8 h (one working day).
- Number of scans (preliminarily planned in situ): 75.
- Calculated estimated time for one scan (including manual activities)—scanning time budget: 6:24 min.
- Scanning parameters by FARO: 1/2; ×2; 360/300 (Table 4), which gives the time to complete one scan as 5:13 min.
- Planned scan time: 6:32 h.
- Time reserved for manual activities and possible repetitions: 1:28 h.
4.4. Photogrammetric Data Acquisition of the Pieta Sculpture
5. Results
5.1. Results of 3D Scanning of the Church Interior
5.2. Assessment of the Accuracy of the Results of Scanning and Modeling the Interior of the Church Building of St Adalbert in Chicago
5.3. The Results of Photographing the Pieta Sculpture
5.4. Post-Processing Results
5.5. Using a 3D Model of the Church Interior
- Generating 3D panoramas from various points inside the church (Figure 22). Panoramas are created in SCENE 2013 (you can also use Blender 4.0 for these purposes).
- Making the 3D mesh model of the church interior available online for viewing in web browsers and locally (Figure 24). Such models cannot be too large (max. 400 MB), so it is necessary to simplify the base mesh model using the RealityCapture 1.3 program.
6. Discussion
- The need to perform the scan once and in existing conditions.
- Limited scanning task execution time.
- Predefined scanning date—suboptimal lighting conditions.
- Cannot repeat scanning.
- Exclusive access to the interior of the facility—no outsiders disturbing the scanning process.
- Desacralization of the object—the ability to place the scanner in any technically accessible place.
7. Conclusions
- Data acquisition using the TLS method, using appropriate process parameters, allows for effective 3D intervention scanning of the interior of a large historic building (such as a church) with a very complicated architectural structure and numerous interior furnishings with various types of details.
- The key issue during this work was the selection of digitization parameters so that a significant number of scans could be performed in the available time. For the example in question, with the size of the church interior of 30 × 50 × 30 m in 8 h, over six dozen scans were performed. This was possible by establishing such scanner operation settings that limited immunity to interference (occurring to a small extent in a closed facility) while maintaining the highest possible resolution of a single scan, minimizing its execution time to the available limit of 6:24 min per scan. It should also be remembered that it is crucial to properly calibrate the scanner so that the data obtained are of appropriate quality.
- Three-dimensional digital mesh models of individual pieces of equipment are sufficiently detailed, as can be seen from the example of the Christ sculpture shown.
- It is a good practice to take a series of photos to generate digital 3D models using photogrammetry; if possible, the photos should be taken by two different people using two different cameras. Details accidentally omitted in one set are most often available in the second set. The model and texture generation software can operate on significant sets of images (thousands) without slowing down processing time too much.
- The RealityCapture program, using a computer with very high computing capabilities, has become a very effective software that allows for multiple recalculations of point clouds and testing various variants of actions at the post-processing stage.
- Even though Blender is a free software, it turned out to be very useful at the stage of digitally assembling the Pieta sculpture at the altar niche from which it was physically taken. Moreover, it has become a very effective tool for generating a movie presenting a virtual camera’s flight inside the created digital 3D model of the church.
- Having access to high-power computing units is an essential element of efficient post-pressing activities. For example, the above-mentioned movie with a broadcast time of 180 s (3 min) at 24 frames per second was generated for over 78 h.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Protecting Cultural Heritage in Times of Conflict: Contributions from the Participants of the International Course on First Aid to Cultural Heritage in Times of Conflict; Lambert, S.; Rockwell, C. (Eds.) ICCROM (International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural PropertyI): Roma, Italy, 2012; Available online: https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/ICCROM_18_ProtectingHeritageConflict_en_0.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2024).
- Silva, F.P. Usinagem de Espumas de Poliuretano e Digitalização Tridimensional Para Fabricação de Assentos Personalizados Para Pessoas com Deficiência; Tese Doutorado—Curso de Engenharia, Minas, Metalúrgica e Materiais, Universidade Federal do Rio: Porto Alegre, Grande do Sul, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Wachowiak, M.J.; Karas, B.V. 3D Scanning and Replication for Museum and Cultural Heritage Applications. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation. 2009, 48, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younan, S.; Treadaway, C. Digital 3D models of heritage artefacts: Towards a digital dream space. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2015, 2, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barszcz, M.; Dziedzic, K.; Skublewska-Paszkowska, M.; Powroźnik, P. 3D Scanning Digital Models for Virtual Museums. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 2023, 34, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.H.; Jo, Y.H.; Song, J.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.S. A Study on Convergence Modeling of Cultural Artifact Using X-ray Computed Tomography and Three-dimensional Scanning Technologies. In Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-2-2023, 29th CIPA Symposium “Documenting, Understanding, Preserving Cultural Heritage: Humanities and Digital Technologies for Shaping the Future”, Florence, Italy, 25–30 June 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merella, M.; Farina, S.; Scaglia, P.; Caneve, G.; Bernardini, G.; Pieri, A.; Collareta, A.; Bianucci, G. Structured-Light 3D Scanning as a Tool for Creating a Digital Collection of Modern and Fossil Cetacean Skeletons (Natural History Museum, University of Pisa). Heritage 2023, 6, 6762–6776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz, R.M.; Torres, M.T.M.; Allegue, P.S. Comparative Analysis Between the Main 3D Scanning Techniques: Photogrammetry, Terrestrial Laser Scanner, and Structured Light Scanner in Religious Imagery: The Case of The Holy Christ of the Blood. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 2021, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calvo-Serrano, M.A.; Ortiz-Cordero, R.; Hidalgo-Fernandez, R.E.; Mesas-Carrascosa, F.J.; Montes-Tubío, F.d.P.; Triviño-Tarradas, P. Historical-graphical analysis and digital preservation of cultural heritage: Case study of the baptismal font of the church of Santiago Apóstol in Montilla (Córdoba, Spain). Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gherardini, F.; Sirocchi, S. Systematic Integration of 2D and 3D Sources for the Virtual Reconstruction of Lost Heritage Artefacts: The Equestrian Monument of Francesco III d’Este (1774–1796, Modena, Italy). Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, O.C.; Chin, C.S.; Majid, Z.; Setan, H. 3D Documentation and Preservation of Historical Monument Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Geoinf. Sci. J. 2010, 10, 73–90. [Google Scholar]
- Balletti, C.; Ballarin, M. An Application of Integrated 3D Technologies for Replicas in Cultural Heritage. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oostwegel, L.J.N.; Jaud, Š.; Muhič, S.; Rebec, K.M. Digitalization of culturally significant buildings: Ensuring high-quality data exchanges in the heritage domain using OpenBIM. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tysiac, P.; Sieńska, A.; Tarnowska, M.; Kedziorski, P.; Jagoda, M. Combination of terrestrial laser scanning and UAV photogrammetry for 3D modelling and degradation assessment of heritage building based on a lighting analysis: Case study—St. Adalbert Church in Gdansk, Poland. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Małyszek, H.A.; Stachula, S.; Kępowicz, B. The Case Study of Using Photogrammetric Systems and Laser Scanning for Three-Dimensional Modeling of Cultural Heritage Sites. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2023, 17, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caciora, T.; Jubran, A.; Ilies, D.C.; Hodor, N.; Blaga, L.; Ilies, A.; Grama, V.; Sebesan, B.; Safarov, B.; Ilies, G.; et al. Digitization of the Built Cultural Heritage: An Integrated Methodology for Preservation and Accessibilization of an Art Nouveau Museum. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambers, K.; Eisenbeiss, H.; Sauerbier, M.; Kupferschmidt, D.; Gaisecker, T.; Sotoodeh, S.; Hanusch, T. Combining photogrammetry and laser scanning for the recording and modelling of the Late Intermediate Period site of Pinchango Alto, Palpa, Peru. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007, 34, 1702–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guidi, G.; Russo, M.; Angheleddu, D. 3D survey and virtual reconstruction of archeological sites. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2014, 1, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serna, C.G.; Pillay, R.; Trémeau, A. Data Fusion of Objects Using Techniques Such as Laser Scanning, Structured Light and Photogrammetry for Cultural Heritage Applications. In Computational Color Imaging; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 208–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neamtu, C.; Comes, R.; Popescu, D. Methodology to Create Digital and Virtual 3D Artefacts in Archaeology. J. Anc. Hist. Archeol. 2016, 3, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, B.J.; Blackwood, A.F.; Penzo-Kajewski, P.; Menter, C.G.; Herries, A.I. Terrestrial laser scanning and photogrammetry techniques for documenting fossil-bearing palaeokarst with an example from the Drimolen Palaeocave System, South Africa. Archaeol. Prospect. 2018, 25, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pepe, M.; Costantino, D.; Alfio, V.S.; Restuccia, A.G.; Papalino, N.M. Scan to BIM for the Digital Management and Representation in 3D GIS Environment of Cultural Heritage Site. J. Cult. Herit. 2021, 50, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Du, Y.; Yang, M.; Liang, J.; Bai, H.; Li, R.; Law, A. A review of the tools and techniques used in the digital preservation of architectural heritage within disaster cycles. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miłosz, M.; Montusiewicz, J.; Kęsik, J. 3D Information Technologies in Cultural Heritage Preservation and Popularization—As Series of Seminars for Museologists Made by Computer Scientists. In Proceedings of the EDULEARN’20: 12th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Valencia, Spain, 6–7 July 2020; pp. 544–549. [Google Scholar]
- 3D Digital Silk Road Portal. Available online: https://silkroad3d.com/ (accessed on 10 January 2024).
- Barbieri, L.; Bruno, F.; Muzzupappa, M. Virtual Museum System Evaluation through User Studies. J. Cult. Herit. 2017, 26, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bustillo, A.; Alaguero, M.; Miguel, I.; Saiz, J.M.; Iglesias, L.S. A Flexible Platform for the Creation of 3D Semi-immersive Environments to Teach Cultural Heritage. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2015, 2, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Żyła, K.; Montusiewicz, J.; Skulimowski, S.; Kayumov, R. VR Technologies as an Extension to the Museum Exhibition: A Case Study of the Silk Road Museums in Samarkand. Museol. Cult. Herit. 2020, 8, 73–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.-H.; Kim, C.; Kim, H.; Kim, H.-S.; Lim, C. Students’ Reactions to Virtual Geological Field Trip to Baengnyeong Island, South Korea. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suryani, M.; Rusidiawan, R.S.; Rosadi, R. Development of Historical Learning Media Based on Virtual Reality of The National Awakening Museum. J. Ilm. Bid. Teknol. Inf. Dan Komun. 2022, 7, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hevko, I.; Potapchuk, O.; Lutsyk, I.; Yavorska, V.; Tkachuk, V. Methods Building and Printing 3D Models Historical Architectural Objects. SHS Web Conf. 2020, 75, 04016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parsinejad, H.; Choi, I.; Yari, M. Production of Iranian Architectural Assets for Representation in Museums: Theme of Museum-Based Digital Twin. Body Space Technol. 2020, 20, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montusiewicz, J.; Milosz, M. Architectural Jewels of Lublin: A Modern Computerized Board Game in Cultural Heritage Education. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 2021, 14, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, L. 3D scanning, modeling, and printing of Chinese classical garden rockeries: Zhanyuan’s South Rockery. Herit. Sci. 2020, 8, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kęsik, J.; Milosz, M.; Montusiewicz, J.; Samarov, K. Documenting the geometry of large architectural monuments using 3D scanning—The case of the dome of the Golden Mosque of the Tillya-Kori Madrasah in Samarkand. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2021, 22, e00199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bent, G.R.; Pfaff, D.; Brooks, M.; Radpour, R.; Delaney, J. A practical workflow for the 3D reconstruction of complex historic sites and their decorative interiors: Florence As It Was and the church of Orsanmichele. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moussa, W. Integration of Digital Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Cultural Heritage Data Recording. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastonero, P.; Donadio, E.; Chiabrando, F.; Spanò, A. Fusion of 3D models derived from TLS and image-based techniques for CH enhanced documentation. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014, II-5, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forkuo, E.K.; King, B. Automatic Fusion of Photogrammetric Imagery and Laser Scanner Point Clouds. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2004, 35, 921–926. [Google Scholar]
- Rönnholm, P.; Honkavaara, E.; Litkey, P.; Hyyppä, H.; Hyyppä, J. Integration of Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2007, 36, 355–362. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, B.; Tang, S. Review of geometric fusion of remote sensing imagery and laser scanning data. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 2015, 6, 97–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saint Adalbert Church. Available online: https://kosciolypolskiewusa.com/parafia-sw-wojciecha/ (accessed on 10 January 2024).
- Polski kościół, Ś.W. Wojciecha. Available online: https://deon24.com/2023/08/16/polski-kosciol-sw-wojciecha-traci-cenne-witraze-mimo-ze-ma-byc-objety-ochrona/ (accessed on 10 January 2024).
- Kościół, Ś.W. Wojciecha—Architektoniczna Perełka Polskiego Chicago. Available online: https://dziennikzwiazkowy.com/polonijne-parafie/kosciol-sw-wojciecha-architektoniczna-perelka-polskiego-chicago/#google_vignette (accessed on 10 January 2024).
- Gutowski, B.S. Adalbert Church. In Polish Parishes and Churches in Chicago; Polonika: Warsaw, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Standard Specification for 3D Imaging Data Exchange Version 1.0. Available online: https://www.astm.org/e2807-11r19.html (accessed on 10 January 2024).
- Pieta Returns to the Church of St. Wojciech [St. Adalbert], Monitor, 2 X 2023. Available online: https://www.monitorlocalnews.com/pieta-wraca-do-kosciola-sw-wojciecha (accessed on 10 January 2024).
- Altuntas, C.; Yildiz, F.; Scaioni, M. Laser Scanning and Data Integration for Three-Dimensional Digital Recording of Complex Historical Structures: The Case of Mevlana Museum. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.T.; Fritsch, D. Integration of Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry in 3D/4D Cultural Heritage Preservation—A Review. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No. | Parameter | Unit of Measure | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Measurement range | m | 0.5–150 |
Measurement range for reflective surfaces: | |||
2 | 90% (white) | m | 0.5–150 |
3 | 10% (grey) | m | 0.5–150 |
4 | 2% (black) | m | 0.5–50 |
5 | Measurement area—horizontal | degree | 360 |
6 | Measurement area—vertical | degree | 300 |
7 | Systematic distance measurement error | mm | ±1 |
Noise range for reflective surfaces: | |||
8 | 90% (white) | mm | 0.1 at 10 m, 0.2 at 25 m |
9 | 10% (grey) | mm | 0.3 at 10 m, 0.4 at 25 m |
10 | 2% (black) | mm | 0.7 at 10 m, 1.2 at 25 m |
11 | Maximum measurement speed | pts/s | 2,000,000 |
12 | Steps count at 360° | pts | 40,960 |
13 | Scan leveling accuracy (within ±2°) | arcsec | 19 |
14 | Internal, coaxial camera of the scanner—resolution HDR | px | 13,000,000 |
15 | Spherical image size, max | px | 266,000,000 |
No. | Parameter | Unit of Measure | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Systematic distance measurement error 10 m (with respect to calibration ranging equipment) | mm | −0.31 to 0.15 |
2 | Systematic distance measurement error 25 m (with respect to calibration ranging equipment) | mm | 0.36 |
Noise range for reflective surfaces: | |||
3 | 90% (white) | mm | 0.0 at 10 m, 0.1 at 25 m |
4 | 10% (grey) | mm | 0.1 at 10 m, 0.2 at 25 m |
5 | 2% (black) | mm | 0.3 at 10 m, 0.6 at 25 m |
No. | Tool | Parameters |
---|---|---|
1 | Laptop used at the expedition | CPU: 16 core AMD Ryzen 9 processor RAM: 64 GB Graphic card: Geforce RTX 4090 12 GB Storage: 4 TB SSD |
2 | High-end computing workstation (stationary) | CPU: 64 core AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX RAM: 512 GB Graphic card: RTX 4090 16 GB Storage: 12 TB RAID SSD |
3 | FARO SCENE 2023 | A specialized program for FARO scanners to generate a cloud-based 3D model integrated from all scans performed. It has the ability to export data to external programs. |
4 | RealityCapture 1.3 | A specialized program for generating 3D models based on photogrammetry and TLS data. It allows, among others, for the importing of data in the form of point clouds, the generating of mesh 3D models, and the importing of a series of photos for downloading textures and integrating them within a digital model, as well as the generating of mesh models from a series of photos. |
5 | Blender 3.9/4.0 | Free program for processing mesh 3D models. It allows, among others, for modifications and reconstructions of digital models, the defining of the internal environment (lights, shadows, reflections, etc.) and the generating of animations, e.g., camera flights inside the digital model along a designed trajectory. |
No. | Parameter | Unit of Measure | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Measurement density in relation to the basic one | times | 1/2 |
2 | Accuracy (number of repetitions) of measurement—noise immunity | times | 2× |
3 | Horizontal measurement range degree | degree | 360 |
4 | Vertical measurement range degree | degree | 300 |
5 | Image acquisition | yes/no | yes |
6 | Brightness measurement | type | spherical |
7 | HDR | times | 2× |
8 | Time to complete a single scan (with photos) | minutes | 5:13 |
No. | Parameter | Unit of Measure | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Number of scans (separate point clouds) | pieces | 74 |
2 | Number of high-resolution photos (6000 × 4000 px) | pieces | 1580 |
3 | Resolution of the base point cloud | pts/cm2 | 60–100 |
4 | Number of points in the base point cloud | pts | 3,500,000,000 |
5 | Size of the base point cloud | GB | 65 |
6 | Number of triangles in the base 3D mesh model | pieces | 1,600,000,000 |
7 | Number of vertices in the base 3D mesh model | pieces | 788,000,000 |
8 | Size of the 3D mesh base model | GB | 60 |
9 | Base cloud generation time | h | 3.5 |
10 | Time to generate the base 3D mesh model | h | 2.5 |
No. | Type | Number of Photos |
---|---|---|
1 | General Plan Photos | 33 |
2 | Medium Plan Photos | 127 |
10 | Detailed Photos | 1420 |
No. | Parameter | Unit of Measure | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Height of the figure | m | 1.64 |
2 | Number of points in the cloud | pts | 899,422 |
3 | Point cloud size (.e57 format) | MB | 13.2 |
4 | Number of triangles in the 3D mesh model | pts | 2,215,560 |
5 | Number of vertices in the 3D mesh model | pts | 738,520 |
6 | Mesh model size (.stl format) | MB | 36.1 |
No. | Parameter | Unit of Measure | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Number of measurements of the difference between the point cloud and the mesh model | pts | 526,530 |
2 | Average value of the absolute mismatch between the point cloud and the mesh model | mm | 0.335 |
3 | Standard deviation of absolute mismatch | mm | 0.300 |
No. | Factor | Feature | Impact on Scanning Parameters |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Negative factor 1 | Condition of the church—damage and devastation caused by unauthorized persons | Decision to scan in its existing state—no impact |
2 | Negative factor 2 | Available time for scanning: 8 h | The need to adjust scanning parameters to complete all necessary scans in the available time with a margin of time for unforeseen events. The maximum available time for a single scan was set at 6:24 min. |
3 | Negative factor 3 | Scanning between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. | Change in lighting, in particular, the sun shining through stained glass windows. Adjusting the order in which photos of stained glass windows were taken. Adjusting the scanner position to avoid direct sunlight exposure on the scanner mirror. Impact on scanning time—insignificant; spare scanning time was used. |
4 | Negative factor 4 | One-time access to the facility. High probability of dismantling the object in a short time. | The need to define the scanner position with appropriate redundancy to compensate for possible defects in individual scans. Planned number of scans: 75 (realized: 74). |
5 | Positive factor 1 | No significant disturbances and changes in the object over the available time | Possibility to reduce noise compensation: compensation (measurement repetition) at 2×. |
6 | Positive factor 2 | No inaccessible zones due to violation of the sacred | Inclusion of additional scanning points within the main altar (over five additional points) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Milosz, M.; Kęsik, J.; Montusiewicz, J. Three-Dimensional Digitization of Documentation and Perpetual Preservation of Cultural Heritage Buildings at Risk of Liquidation and Loss—The Methodology and Case Study of St Adalbert’s Church in Chicago. Electronics 2024, 13, 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030561
Milosz M, Kęsik J, Montusiewicz J. Three-Dimensional Digitization of Documentation and Perpetual Preservation of Cultural Heritage Buildings at Risk of Liquidation and Loss—The Methodology and Case Study of St Adalbert’s Church in Chicago. Electronics. 2024; 13(3):561. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030561
Chicago/Turabian StyleMilosz, Marek, Jacek Kęsik, and Jerzy Montusiewicz. 2024. "Three-Dimensional Digitization of Documentation and Perpetual Preservation of Cultural Heritage Buildings at Risk of Liquidation and Loss—The Methodology and Case Study of St Adalbert’s Church in Chicago" Electronics 13, no. 3: 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030561
APA StyleMilosz, M., Kęsik, J., & Montusiewicz, J. (2024). Three-Dimensional Digitization of Documentation and Perpetual Preservation of Cultural Heritage Buildings at Risk of Liquidation and Loss—The Methodology and Case Study of St Adalbert’s Church in Chicago. Electronics, 13(3), 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030561