Explicit Definitions for the Electromagnetic Energies in Electromagnetic Radiation and Mutual Coupling

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Electromagnetic radiation and coupling problems have been intensively researched for many years. According to the author's approach in this paper, the research is based on the canonical theory generally known in the classical theory of charged particles that the fields associated with charged particles can be divided into Coulomb fields, velocity fields and radiation fields.

Reviewer's opinion:

Very well and thoroughly described approach to problem description using basic knowledge and references. In the Abstract, there is an unnecessary description of known topics and a lack of motivation and quantitative description of the topic from the title of the research.

A better definition of the description of equations (5) and (6) is needed, as well as a reference for them. Furthermore, the unclear sentence in line 62.

The description in the text below picture 1 has an error.

In the description below picture 2, the description of the meaning and configuration of the graphic representation of red color is missing. A better description of Figure 2 is generally needed.

Insufficient list of reference literature with Open Access availability.

In this paper, the authors point out that they introduce the theory and propose clear definitions and explicit expressions for reactive energy and radio radiation energy. In deed it is a reformulation of radiant energy and reactive energy in a consistent formulation of the power balance equation.

But as the authors emphasized, the theory does not suffer from mathematical deficiencies since there is no modification total electromagnetic energy and Pointing's theorem. Every mathematical calculation suffers from the limits of environmental and boundary conditions, which are impossible to assume in the uncertainty matrix as a proven component for the calculation of the total measurement uncertainty.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1) In the article, it is formulated that the electrical and magnetic radiative energies are equal to expose a proposal to obtain a descriptive equation of the total electromagnetic energy. Is this formulation compatible in a general way? What would be the conditions to take into account?

 2) What practical advantages does this new formulation have in its fields of application?

 3) What is the crucial difference between this formulation and Carpenter's formulation regarding electromagnetic mutual coupling?

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The same paper can be found at https://www.techrxiv.org/articles/preprint/A_Theory_for_Electromagnetic_Radiation_and_Coupling/16686112/2

 

The plagiarism rate is 76%

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

The same paper can be found at https://www.techrxiv.org/articles/preprint/A_Theory_for_Electromagnetic_Radiation_and_Coupling/16686112/2

 

The plagiarism rate is 76%

Author Response

The editor office has confirmed the preprint.
The attachment is our revised manuscript, because until this moment, the Submit Revised Manuscript is not open for me to resubmit a new paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear,

The paper is good and merit to be in the journal

Dear,

 

There are a few grammatical errors.