What Likeability Attributes Attract People to Watch Online Video Advertisements?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Background
2.1. Online Advertising Likeability
2.2. Previous Studies on Online Video Advertisement
Study | Method | Objective | Results |
---|---|---|---|
[30] | Survey (descriptive survey) | To examine factors that affect consumer response to online video advertisement | Showed that consumer behavior toward online video advertisement positively affects consumer response |
[29] | Deep learning | To predict instantaneous likeability of advertisements | Proposed algorithm to predict instantaneous likeability of advertisements and compared the algorithm with other methods |
[25] | Survey | To investigate the effects of content likeability, content credibility, and social media engagement on users’ acceptance of product placement in mobile social networks | Showed that content likeability is an antecedent of social media engagement and content credibility; social media engagement has an influence on content credibility; and content likeability, content credibility, and social media engagement both directly affect user acceptance of product placement in mobile social networks |
[24] | Mixed-effects regression | To understand ad-related characteristics that drive virality (sharing) of online ads | Found that positive emotions of amusement, excitement, inspiration, and warmth positively affect sharing |
[28] | Survey | To identify dimensions of YouTube advertising that may affect advertising value, as well as brand awareness and, accordingly, purchase intentions of consumers | Showed that entertainment, informativeness, and customization are the strongest positive drivers, while irritation is negatively related to YouTube advertising |
[26] | Survey | To examine the effects of likeability dynamics on consumers’ intentions to share online video advertisements | Found that high likeability at the beginning and the end of a video advertisement is important |
[27] | Experiment | To examine the effects of advertisement characteristics (i.e., length, humor, and informativeness) on perceived ad intrusiveness and on marketing outcomes | Showed that intrusive advertisements negatively affected attitudes and intentions toward both the advertised brand and the host website |
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Context
3.2. A Mixed-Methods Approach and Research Procedure
3.3. Text-Mining Analysis and Focus Group Discussion (FGD)
4. Results
4.1. Exploratory Study
4.2. Confirmatory Study
5. Discussion and Implications
5.1. Discussion of Findings
5.2. Limitations and Future Research
5.3. Implications for Research and Practice
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shon, M.; Shin, J.; Hwang, J.; Lee, D. Free Contents vs. Inconvenience Costs: Two Faces of Online Video Advertising. Telemat. Inform. 2021, 56, 101476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCoy, S.; Everard, A.; Galletta, D.F.; Moody, G.D. Here We Go Again! The Impact of Website Ad Repetition on Recall, Intrusiveness, Attitudes, and Site Revisit Intentions. Inf. Manag. 2017, 54, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, T.S. When People Pay Attention to Video Ads and Why. Available online: https://hbr.org/2015/10/when-people-pay-attention-to-video-ads-and-why (accessed on 14 October 2021).
- Biel, A.L.; Bridgwater, C.A. Attributes of Likable Television Commericals. J. Advert. Res. 1990, 30, 38–44. [Google Scholar]
- Fam, K.-S.; Waller, D.S. Ad Likeability and Brand Recall in Asia: A Cross-Cultural Study. J. Brand Manag. 2004, 12, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aaker, D.A.; Stayman, D.M. Measuring Audience Perceptions of Commercials and Relating Them to Ad Impact. J. Advert. Res. 1990, 30, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
- Du Plessis, E. Recognition versus Recall. J. Advert. Res. 1994, 34, 75–92. [Google Scholar]
- Haley, R.I.; Baldinger, A.L. The ARF Copy Research Validity Project. J. Advert. Res. 1991, 31, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smit, E.G.; Van Meurs, L.; Neijens, P.C. Effects of Advertising Likeability: A 10-Year Perspective. J. Advert. Res. 2006, 46, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stapel, J. A Brief Observation about Likability and Interestingness of Advertising. J. Advert. Res. 1994, 34, 79–80. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, D.; Dubitsky, T.M. Why Liking Matters. J. Advert. Res. 1994, 34, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
- Cummins, R.; Putnam, H.; Block, N. Representations, Targets, and Attitudes; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Belanche, D.; Flavián, C.; Pérez-Rueda, A. Understanding Interactive Online Advertising: Congruence and Product Involvement in Highly and Lowly Arousing, Skippable Video Ads. J. Interact. Mark. 2017, 37, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultan, F.; Rohm, A.J.; Gao, T.T. Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Marketing: A Two-Country Study of Youth Markets. J. Interact. Mark. 2009, 23, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heath, R.; Brandt, D.; Nairn, A. Brand Relationships: Strengthened by Emotion, Weakened by Attention. J. Advert. Res. 2006, 46, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashkevich, M.; Dorai-Raj, S.; Kellar, M.; Zigmond, D. Empowering Online Advertisements by Empowering Viewers with the Right to Choose: The Relative Effectiveness of Skippable Video Advertisements on YouTube. J. Advert. Res. 2012, 52, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biel, A.L. Love the Ad. Buy the Product? Admap 1990, 26, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
- MacKenzie, S.B.; Lutz, R.J. An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context. J. Mark. 1989, 53, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franzen, G. Advertising Effectiveness: Findings from Empirical Research; NTC Publications: Oxfordshire, UK, 1994; ISBN 978-1-870562-88-1. [Google Scholar]
- Hollis, N.S. Like It or Not, Liking Is Not Enough. J. Advert. Res. 1995, 35, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
- Thorson, E. Likeability: 10 Years of Academic Research. In Proceedings of the Eight Annual ARF Copy Research Workshop, Advertising Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA, 11 September 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Fam, K.-S. Attributes of Likeable Television Commercials in Asia. J. Advert. Res. 2008, 48, 418–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.-C.; Yang, C.; Huang, C.-H.; Shih, P.-H.; Yang, S.Y. Consumer Attitudes toward Online Video Advertising: An Empirical Study on YouTube as Platform. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Selangor, Malaysia, 9–12 December 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1131–1135. [Google Scholar]
- Tellis, G.J.; MacInnis, D.J.; Tirunillai, S.; Zhang, Y. What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence. J. Mark. 2019, 83, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai Lai, I.K.; Liu, Y. The Effects of Content Likeability, Content Credibility, and Social Media Engagement on Users’ Acceptance of Product Placement in Mobile Social Networks. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2020, 15, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehu, E.; Bijmolt, T.H.; Clement, M. Effects of Likeability Dynamics on Consumers’ Intention to Share Online Video Advertisements. J. Interact. Mark. 2016, 35, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodrich, K.; Schiller, S.Z.; Galletta, D. Consumer Reactions to Intrusiveness of Online-Video Advertisements: Do Length, Informativeness, and Humor Help (or Hinder) Marketing Outcomes? J. Advert. Res. 2015, 55, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghani, M.; Niaki, M.K.; Ramezani, I.; Sali, R. Evaluating the Influence of YouTube Advertising for Attraction of Young Customers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 59, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, D.; Rahman, S.M.; Islam, M.T.; Ahmad, M.O.; Swamy, M.N.S. Prediction of Instantaneous Likeability of Advertisements Using Deep Learning. Cogn. Comput. Syst. 2021, 3, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puwandi, P.H.; DE, G.T.; Brasali, N. The Factors Affecting Consumer Response towards Online Video Advertisement: YouTube as a Platform. Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst. 2020, 7, 375–390. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, S.-H.; Kim, H.-W.; Kankanhalli, A. What Makes People Watch Online TV Clips? An Empirical Investigation of Survey Data and Viewing Logs. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 59, 102329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; Sullivan, Y.W. Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-Methods Research: An Extension and Illustration. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2016, 17, 435–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.-H.; Lee, B.-Y.; Kim, H.-W. Decisional Factors Leading to the Reuse of an On-Demand Ride Service. Inf. Manag. 2019, 56, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onwuegbuzie, A.J.; Leech, N.L. Linking Research Questions to Mixed Methods Data Analysis Procedures. Qual. Rep. 2006, 11, 474–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; Bala, H. Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems. MIS Q. 2013, 37, 21–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennink, M.M. Focus Group Discussions; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.-H.; Choi, S.; Kim, H.-W. Unveiling the Success Factors of BTS: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Internet Res. 2020, 31, 1518–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, I.; Kiatkawsin, K. Determinants of Guest Experience in Airbnb: A Topic Modeling Approach Using LDA. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blei, D.M. Probabilistic Topic Models. Commun. ACM 2012, 55, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boateng, W. Evaluating the Efficacy of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Qualitative Social Research. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2012, 3, 54–57. [Google Scholar]
- Krueger, R.A.; Sage, U.K.; Morgan, D.L.; Stewart, D.W.; Shamdasani, P.N. Focus Group Discussion, 3rd ed.; Sage Publication: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Khalifa, O.; Corne, D.W.; Chantler, M.; Halley, F. Multi-Objective Topic Modeling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Sheffield, UK, 19–22 March 2013; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 51–65. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, J.; Gerrish, S.; Wang, C.; Boyd-Graber, J.L.; Blei, D.M. Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–10 December 2009; pp. 288–296. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, D.; Lau, J.H.; Grieser, K.; Baldwin, T. Automatic Evaluation of Topic Coherence. In Proceedings of the HLT’10—Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2–4 June 2010; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lantos, G.P.; Craton, L.G. A Model of Consumer Response to Advertising Music. J. Consum. Mark. 2012, 29, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mooradian, T.A.; Matzler, K.; Szykman, L. Empathetic Responses to Advertising: Testing a Network of Antecedents and Consequences. Mark. Lett. 2008, 19, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yannopoulos, P. Celebrity Advertising: Literature Review and Propositions. World Rev. Bus. Res. 2012, 2, 24–36. [Google Scholar]
- Fam, K.-S.; Waller, D.S. Identifying Likeable Attributes: A Qualitative Study of Television Advertisements in Asia. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2006, 9, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raditya, D.; Gunadi, W.; Setiono, D.; Rawung, J. The Effect of Ad Content and Ad Length on Consumer Response towards Online Video Advertisement. Winners 2020, 21, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ducoffe, R.H. How Consumers Assess the Value of Advertising. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 1995, 17, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, A.C.; Miller, D.L. A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference. J. Hum. Resour. 2015, 50, 317–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Lee, L. A Spatial Autoregressive Model with a Nonlinear Transformation of the Dependent Variable. J. Econom. 2015, 186, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevy, M.; Hung, K. Music in Television Advertising and Other Persuasive Media. Psychol. Music Multimed. 2013, 315–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alexomanolaki, M.; Loveday, C.; Kennett, C. Music and Memory in Advertising: Music as a Device of Implicit Learning and Recall. Music Sound Mov. Image 2007, 1, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Pelsmacker, P.; Geuens, M.; Anckaert, P. Media Context and Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Context Appreciation and Context/Ad Similarity. J. Advert. 2002, 31, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruner, R.L.; Vomberg, A.; Homburg, C.; Lukas, B.A. Supporting New Product Launches with Social Media Communication and Online Advertising: Sales Volume and Profit Implications. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2019, 36, 172–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, M.; Wiegand, N.; Reinartz, W.J. Does It Pay to Be Real? Understanding Authenticity in TV Advertising. J. Mark. 2019, 83, 24–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Likeability Attributes | Questions |
---|---|
Music effect |
|
Message delivery |
|
Storytelling |
|
Influential people |
|
Novel idea |
|
Event-based information |
|
Topic Modeling Results | ||
---|---|---|
Key Likeability Attributes | Keywords | Sample Comments |
Music effect | voice, music, song, sound, addiction, music video, digital sound source |
|
Message delivery | life, begin, cheer, support, victory, message, empathetic |
|
Storytelling | plot, youth, love, story, image, web drama |
|
Influential people | Young-woong, Jennie, model, Lee-naeun, Gwang-hui |
|
Novel idea | witty, novel, fun, ridiculous, charm |
|
Event-based information | gift, collection, marketing, thanks, event |
|
Mean | S.D. | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | V7 | V8 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Music effect | V1 | 2.563 | 1.831 | 1.000 | |||||||
Message delivery | V2 | 2.051 | 1.296 | 0.090 | 1.000 | ||||||
Storytelling | V3 | 2.743 | 1.824 | –0.026 | 0.210 | 1.000 | |||||
Influential people | V4 | 3.941 | 1.932 | 0.109 | –0.112 | 0.092 | 1.000 | ||||
Novel idea | V5 | 2.063 | 1.517 | 0.143 | –0.097 | 0.212 | 0.164 | 1.000 | |||
Event-based information | V6 | 2.452 | 1.645 | –0.125 | –0.141 | 0.005 | –0.098 | 0.014 | 1.000 | ||
Length | V7 | 45.261 | 72.118 | –0.044 | 0.004 | 0.097 | –0.003 | 0.103 | 0.063 | 1.000 | |
VTR | V8 | 0.271 | 0.107 | 0.196 | 0.013 | 0.225 | 0.216 | 0.221 | –0.066 | –0.079 | 1.000 |
Model (1): DV | Model (2): Logit-Transformed DV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
S.E. | S.E. | |||
Music effect | 0.009 ** | (0.003) | 1.041 ** | (0.012) |
Message delivery | –0.001 | (0.005) | 1.004 | (0.020) |
Storytelling | 0.012 ** | (0.004) | 1.052 ** | (0.015) |
Influential people | 0.008 * | (0.003) | 1.041 ** | (0.015) |
Novel idea | 0.010 ** | (0.003) | 1.049 *** | (0.012) |
Event-based Information | –0.002 | (0.004) | 1.000 | (0.018) |
Length | 0.000 | (0.000) | 0.999 | (0.000) |
Constant | 0.177 *** | (0.024) | 0.152 *** | (0.129) |
0.150 | 0.146 |
Key Likeability Attributes | Suggested Strategies |
---|---|
Music effect |
|
Storytelling |
|
Influential people |
|
Novel idea |
|
Message delivery |
|
Event-based information |
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yoon, S.-H.; Lee, S.-H. What Likeability Attributes Attract People to Watch Online Video Advertisements? Electronics 2022, 11, 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131960
Yoon S-H, Lee S-H. What Likeability Attributes Attract People to Watch Online Video Advertisements? Electronics. 2022; 11(13):1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131960
Chicago/Turabian StyleYoon, Sang-Hyeak, and So-Hyun Lee. 2022. "What Likeability Attributes Attract People to Watch Online Video Advertisements?" Electronics 11, no. 13: 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131960
APA StyleYoon, S.-H., & Lee, S.-H. (2022). What Likeability Attributes Attract People to Watch Online Video Advertisements? Electronics, 11(13), 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131960