A Market Concentration Analysis of the Biomass Sector in Romania
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Market Share Approach
1.2. Indicators of Degree of Market Concentration
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Computing an Upper Limit M for HHI
2.2. Computing a Lower Limit N for HHI
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Biomass Producer | Market Share |
---|---|
ALUCO | 16.2% |
ARIADNE IMPEX | 12.7% |
BIOMASS ENERGY FARMING | 11.3% |
BIOSAL ENERG | 8.4% |
ELECTRAWINDS-R SRL | 8.2% |
ERPEK IND SRL | 7.9% |
EXPLOCOM GK | 7.2% |
GYPPA SRL | 6.8% |
KONTRASTWEGE | 5.4% |
MAYO BIOENERGY | 2.5% |
SALICANTHUS ENERG | 1.0% |
TREFOREX SA | 0.8% |
Appendix B
Appendix C
References
- Fogarassy, C.; Toth, L.; Czikkely, M.; Finger, D.C. Improving the efficiency of pyrolysis and increasing the quality of gas production through optimization of prototype systems. Resources 2019, 8, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tun, M.M.; Juchelková, D. Biomass sources and energy potential for energy sector in myanmar: An outlook. Resources 2019, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busu, M. Assessment of the impact of bioenergy on sustainable economic development. Energies 2019, 12, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rada, E.C.; Andreottola, G.; Istrate, I.A.; Viotti, P.; Conti, F.; Magaril, E.R. Remediation of soil polluted by organic compounds through chemical oxidation and phytoremediation combined with DCT. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Appiah-Adu, K. Market orientation and performance: Empirical tests in a transition economy. J. Strateg. Mark. 1998, 6, 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gale, B.T.; Branch, B.S. Concentration versus market share: Which determines performance and why does it matter. Antitrust Bull./Spring 1982, 27, 83. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuno, K.; Mentzer, J.T.; Özsomer, A. The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. J. Mark. 2002, 66, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gale, B.T. Market share and rate of return. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1972, 54, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melicher, R.W.; Rush, D.F.; Winn, D.N. Degree of industry concentration and market risk-return performance. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 1976, 11, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frazier, G.L.; Howell, R.D. Business definition and performance. J. Mark. 1983, 47, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busu, M. An economic analysis on the degree of market concentration: Competition Indicators. In Proceedings of the 6th International Management Conference “Approaches in organizational Management”, Bucharest, Romania, 15–16 November 2012; pp. 529–537. [Google Scholar]
- Cioca, L.-I.; Ivascu, L.; Rada, E.C.; Torretta, V.; Ionescu, G. Sustainable development and technological Impact on CO2 reducing conditions in romania. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1637–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busu, M.; Trica, C.L. Sustainability of circular economy indicators and their impact on economic growth of the european union. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gitelman, L.; Magaril, E.; Kozhevnikov, M.; Rada, E.C. Rational behavior of an enterprise in the energy market in a circular economy. Resources 2019, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhalis, D. Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tour. Manag. 2000, 21, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noe, R.; Hollenbeck, J.; Gerhart, B.; Wright, P. Human Resources Management Global Edition: Gaining a Competitive Advantage, 10th ed.; McGraw-Hill Higher Education: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Corina, P.; Daniela, V.A.; Monica, F. Indicators used for the performance measurement of sustainable development. Ann. Univ. Oradea Econ. Sci. Ser. 2009, 18, 421–425. [Google Scholar]
- Dutz, M.A.; Vagliasindi, M. Competition policy implementation in transition economies: An empirical assessment. Eur. Econ. Rev. 2000, 44, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P. The use of performance indicators in the public sector. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) 1990, 153, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schubert, A.; Braun, T. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics 1986, 9, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jasch, C. Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 2000, 8, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, W.M.; Levin, R.C. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handb. Ind. Organ. 1989, 2, 1059–1107. [Google Scholar]
- Fagerberg, J. International competitiveness. Econ. J. 1988, 98, 355–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levitt, T. The globalization of markets. In Readings in International Business: A Decision Approach; McKinsey&Company, Inc.: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; p. 249. [Google Scholar]
- Simon, H.A. Organizations and markets. J. Econ. Perspect. 1991, 5, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimson, E. Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. J. Financ. Econ. 1979, 7, 197–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joskow, P.L.; Tirole, J. Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks. Rand J. Econ. 2000, 31, 450–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bresnahan, T.F. Empirical studies of industries with market power. Handb. Ind. Organ. 1989, 2, 1011–1057. [Google Scholar]
- Teece, D.J. The Multinational Enterprise: Market Failure and Market Power. In Transfer and Licensing of Know-How and Intellectual Property, the: Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World; World Scientific Publishing Co.: Singapore, 2008; p. 405. [Google Scholar]
- Megginson, W.L.; Netter, J.M. From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. J. Econ. Lit. 2001, 39, 321–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biely, K.; Maes, D.; Van Passel, S. Market Power Extended: From Foucault to Meadows. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dormady, N. Carbon Auction Revenue and Market Power: An Experimental Analysis. Energies 2016, 9, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chie, B.T.; Chen, S.H. Competition in a new industrial economy: Toward an agent-based economic model of modularity. Adm. Sci. 2014, 4, 192–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, T.A.; Lin, B.H.; Huang, C.L. Growth and development in the US retail organic food sector. Sustainability 2009, 1, 573–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagerberg, J.; Sollie, G. The method of constant market shares analysis reconsidered. Appl. Econ. 1987, 19, 1571–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stopford, J.M.; Strange, S.; Henley, J.S. Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991; Volume 18. [Google Scholar]
- Calkins, S. The new merger guidelines and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Calif. L. Rev. 1983, 71, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wichmann, B.; Chen, M.; Adamowicz, W. Social networks and choice set formation in discrete choice models. Econometrics 2016, 4, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naldi, M.; Flamini, M. Interval estimation of the Herfindahl-Hirschman index under incomplete market information. In Proceedings of the 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, Cambridge, UK, 26–28 March 2014; pp. 318–323. [Google Scholar]
- Rao, V.M. Two decompositions of concentration ratio. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (Gen.) 1969, 132, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nauenberg, E.; Basu, K.; Chand, H. Hirschman–Herfindahl index determination under incomplete information. Appl. Econ. Lett. 1997, 4, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannan, T.H. Market share inequality, the number of competitors, and the HHI: An examination of bank pricing. Rev. Ind. Organ. 1997, 12, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrea, R.C.; Molănescu, G.; Buṣu, C. Food sustainable model development: An ANP approach to prioritize sustainable factors in the romanian natural soft drinks industry context. Sustainability 2015, 7, 10007–10020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagan, G.; Henry, J.; Mestre, R. An area-wide model for the euro area. Econ. Model. 2005, 22, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCormick, K.; Kautto, N. The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability 2013, 5, 2589–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanderson, M.A.; Adler, P.R. Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 768–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busu, M.; Nedelcu, A.C. Sustainability and Economic Performance of the Companies in the Renewable Energy Sector in Romania. Sustainability 2017, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Finance. 2020. Available online: https://www.mfinante.gov.ro (accessed on 18 March 2020).
Concentration Degree | HHI | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | Department of Justice | |
Low | [0–1000] | [0–1500] |
Medium | [1000–2000] | [1500–2500] |
High | [2000–10,000] | [2500–10,000] |
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Busu, M. A Market Concentration Analysis of the Biomass Sector in Romania. Resources 2020, 9, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060064
Busu M. A Market Concentration Analysis of the Biomass Sector in Romania. Resources. 2020; 9(6):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060064
Chicago/Turabian StyleBusu, Mihail. 2020. "A Market Concentration Analysis of the Biomass Sector in Romania" Resources 9, no. 6: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060064
APA StyleBusu, M. (2020). A Market Concentration Analysis of the Biomass Sector in Romania. Resources, 9(6), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060064