Next Article in Journal
Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of the “El Sexmo” Tourist Gold Mine (Zaruma, Ecuador) as A Geosite and Mining Site
Previous Article in Journal
Water Recovery from Floor Cleaning Operations of Industrial or Public Areas: The Results of a Field Test
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating Consumers’ Perception of Discounted Suboptimal Products at Retail Stores
Open AccessArticle

Sustainability Assessment of Food Redistribution Initiatives in Sweden

1
Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7032, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
2
Ostfold Research, Stadion 4, NO-1671 Kråkerøy, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2020, 9(3), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9030027
Received: 15 January 2020 / Revised: 27 February 2020 / Accepted: 5 March 2020 / Published: 9 March 2020
Food banks that redistribute surplus food from retailers and the food industry to people in need are not a new concept globally, but their connection to food waste prevention is new. As a result, new types of food redistribution units are emerging and diversifying to find new target groups and distribution methods. The aim of this study was to identify and study surplus food redistribution units in Sweden, and then to assess the impact on several sustainability indicators for selected redistribution units, in order to increase knowledge on the types of values these redistribution concepts generate. The methods used for analyzing the scenarios were Environmental Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Costing and Social Life Cycle Assessment. The results showed that providing food bags to socially exposed people generated the largest reduction of greenhouse gas emissions per kg of redistributed food (−1.2 kg CO2 eq./FU). Reprocessing surplus food to a high-quality end-product was attributed a high social value, due to job creation effects in the high number of working hours required per kg of redistributed food. With regard to economic impacts, all but two scenarios studied had monthly financial losses, and therefore needed other sources of financial support. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable development; food waste; life cycle assessment; environment; society; economy sustainable development; food waste; life cycle assessment; environment; society; economy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bergström, P.; Malefors, C.; Strid, I.; Hanssen, O.J.; Eriksson, M. Sustainability Assessment of Food Redistribution Initiatives in Sweden. Resources 2020, 9, 27.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop