Next Article in Journal
Dolomites as SO2 Sorbents in Fluid Combustion Technology
Next Article in Special Issue
Success Factors for Water Safety Plan Implementation in Small Drinking Water Supplies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling of Washing Effectiveness in a High-Pressure Washing Device Obtained for Crushed-Stone and Gravel Aggregates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rural Drinking Water Safety under Climate Change: The Importance of Addressing Physical, Social, and Environmental Dimensions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Does Training Improve Sanitary Inspection Answer Agreement between Inspectors? Quantitative Evidence from the Mukono District, Uganda

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK
2
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Kyambogo, Kiwatule—Banda, Kampala, Uganda
3
British Geological Survey, Maclean Building, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
4
School of Law, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK
5
Consultant, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2020, 9(10), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9100120
Submission received: 17 August 2020 / Revised: 20 September 2020 / Accepted: 29 September 2020 / Published: 10 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drinking Water Safety Management)

Abstract

Sanitary inspections (SIs) are checklists of questions used for achieving/maintaining the safety of drinking-water supplies by identifying observable actual and potential sources and pathways of contamination. Despite the widespread use of SIs, the effects of training on SI response are understudied. Thirty-six spring supplies were inspected on two occasions, pre- and post-training, by an instructor from the research team and four local inspectors in the Mukono District of Uganda. SI score agreement between the instructor and each inspector was calculated using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient. Average SI score agreement between the instructor and all inspectors increased post-training for the Yes/No answer type (0.262 to 0.490). For the risk level answer type (e.g., No, Low, Medium, High), average SI score agreement between the instructor and all inspectors increased post-training (0.301 to 0.380). Variability of SI scores between the four inspectors was calculated using coefficient of variation analysis. Average SI score variability between inspectors reduced post-training for both answer types, Yes/No (21.25 to 16.16) and risk level (24.12 to 19.62). Consistency of answer agreement between the four inspectors for each individual SI question was calculated using index of dispersion analysis. Average answer dispersion between inspectors reduced post-training for both answer types, Yes/No (0.41 to 0.27) and risk level (0.55 to 0.41). The findings indicate that training has a positive effect on improving answer agreement between inspectors. However, advanced training or tailoring of SI questions to the local context may be required where inconsistency of responses between inspectors persists, especially for the risk level answer type that requires increased use of inspector risk perception. Organisations should be aware of the potential inconsistency of results between inspectors so that this may be rectified with appropriate training and, where necessary, better SI design and customisation.
Keywords: drinking-water quality; microbial contamination; risk assessment; risk management; sanitary survey; training; water safety planning drinking-water quality; microbial contamination; risk assessment; risk management; sanitary survey; training; water safety planning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

King, R.; Okurut, K.; Herschan, J.; Lapworth, D.J.; Malcolm, R.; McKeown, R.M.; Pond, K. Does Training Improve Sanitary Inspection Answer Agreement between Inspectors? Quantitative Evidence from the Mukono District, Uganda. Resources 2020, 9, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9100120

AMA Style

King R, Okurut K, Herschan J, Lapworth DJ, Malcolm R, McKeown RM, Pond K. Does Training Improve Sanitary Inspection Answer Agreement between Inspectors? Quantitative Evidence from the Mukono District, Uganda. Resources. 2020; 9(10):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9100120

Chicago/Turabian Style

King, Richard, Kenan Okurut, Jo Herschan, Dan J. Lapworth, Rosalind Malcolm, Rory Moses McKeown, and Katherine Pond. 2020. "Does Training Improve Sanitary Inspection Answer Agreement between Inspectors? Quantitative Evidence from the Mukono District, Uganda" Resources 9, no. 10: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9100120

APA Style

King, R., Okurut, K., Herschan, J., Lapworth, D. J., Malcolm, R., McKeown, R. M., & Pond, K. (2020). Does Training Improve Sanitary Inspection Answer Agreement between Inspectors? Quantitative Evidence from the Mukono District, Uganda. Resources, 9(10), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9100120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop