Next Article in Journal
Categorification of the Müller-Wichards System Performance Estimation Model: Model Symmetries, Invariants, and Closed Forms
Previous Article in Journal
Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

The Epistemological Implications of Critical Complexity Thinking for Operational Research

1
School of Computer, Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
2
School of Philosophy, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
3
Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University, The Stables, 19 Jonkershoek Road, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 December 2018 / Accepted: 11 January 2019 / Published: 21 January 2019
Full-Text   |   PDF [387 KB, uploaded 23 January 2019]   |   Review Reports

Abstract

Classical operational research (OR) is mainly concerned with the use of mathematical techniques and models used in decision-making situations. The basic assumptions of OR presuppose that the structure of the world is one of order and predictability. Although this positivistic approach produces significant results when levels of certainty and initial conditions are stable, it is limited when faced with an acknowledgement of the complex nature of the real world. This paper aims to highlight that by drawing on a general understanding of complexity theory, classical OR approaches can be enriched and broadened by adopting an epistemology based on the assumption that the underlying mechanisms governing the world are complex. It is argued that complexity theory (as interpreted by the philosopher Paul Cilliers) acknowledges the complex nature of the real world and helps to identify the characteristics of complex phenomena. By aligning OR epistemologies with the acknowledgment of complexity, new modelling methods could be developed. In addition, the implications for knowledge generating processes through boundary setting, as well as the provisional nature of such knowledge and what (ethical) responsibilities accompany the study of complex phenomena, will be discussed. Examples are presented to highlight the epistemological implications of complexity thinking for OR. View Full-Text
Keywords: complexity theory; operational research; epistemology; philosophy of operational research complexity theory; operational research; epistemology; philosophy of operational research
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kruger, H.; Verhoef, A.; Preiser, R. The Epistemological Implications of Critical Complexity Thinking for Operational Research. Systems 2019, 7, 5.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Systems EISSN 2079-8954 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top