Next Article in Journal
How to Express and to Measure Whether an Economic System Develops Intensively
Next Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Framework for Exploring Worldviews and Its Generalization as a Multi-Purpose Inquiry Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of ERP Systems in the Cloud: A Study on System Updates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Natural Systems Thinking and the Human Family
Article

Maturity Models for Systems Thinking

Robert B. Willumstad School of Business, Adelphi University, 1 South Avenue, Garden City, NY 11530, USA
Systems 2018, 6(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6020023
Received: 27 March 2018 / Revised: 27 May 2018 / Accepted: 31 May 2018 / Published: 11 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Systems Thinking)
Recent decades have seen a rapid increase in the complexity of goods, products, and services that society has come to demand. This has necessitated a corresponding growth in the requirements demanded of organizational systems and the people who work in them. The competence a person requires to be effective in working in such systems has become an area of increased interest to scholars and practitioners in many disciplines. How can we assess the degree to which a person is executing the competencies required to do good systems work? Several industries now utilize maturity models in the attempt to evaluate and cultivate people’s ability to effectively execute complex tasks. This paper will examine current thought regarding the value and pitfalls of maturity models. It will identify principles and exemplars that could guide the development of a Maturity Model of Systems Thinking Competence (MMSTC) for the varied roles people inhabit in systems contexts. View Full-Text
Keywords: systems thinking; competence; maturity models systems thinking; competence; maturity models
MDPI and ACS Style

Buckle, P. Maturity Models for Systems Thinking. Systems 2018, 6, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6020023

AMA Style

Buckle P. Maturity Models for Systems Thinking. Systems. 2018; 6(2):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6020023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buckle, Pamela. 2018. "Maturity Models for Systems Thinking" Systems 6, no. 2: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6020023

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop