Next Article in Journal
Research Challenges for the Internet of Things: What Role Can OR Play?
Next Article in Special Issue
Reaction Networks as a Language for Systemic Modeling: On the Study of Structural Changes
Previous Article in Journal
Apithology Systems Inquiry: Evaluation from a Generativist Ontology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formal Proof of the Dependable Bypassing Routing Algorithm Suitable for Adaptive Networks on Chip QnoC Architecture
Open AccessArticle

From Systems to Organisations

National Laboratory for Scientific Computation, Av. Getúlio Vargas, 333, 25651-075 Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil
Systems 2017, 5(1), 23;
Received: 31 October 2016 / Accepted: 10 February 2017 / Published: 6 March 2017
Warren Weaver, writing about the function that science should have in mankind’s developing future, ideas and ideals, proposed to classify scientific problems into ‘problems of simplicity’, ‘problems of disorganised complexity’, and ‘problems of organised complexity’—the huge complementary class to which all biological, human, and social problems belong. Problems of simplicity have few components and variables and have been extensively addressed in the last 400 years. Problems of disorganised complexity have a huge number of individually erratic components and variables, but possess collective regularities that can be analysed by resourcing to stochastic methods. Yet, ‘problems of organised complexity’ do not yield easily to classical or statistical treatment. Interrelations among phenomenon elements change during its evolution alongside commonly used state variables. This invalidates independence and additivity assumptions that support reductionism and affect behaviour and outcome. Moreover, organisation, the focal point in this complementary class, is still an elusive concept despite gigantic efforts undertaken since a century ago to tame it. This paper addresses the description, representation and study of phenomena in the ‘problems of organised complexity’ class, arguing that they should be treated as a collection of interacting organisations. Furthermore, grounded on relational mathematical constructs, a formal theoretical framework that provides operational definitions, schemes for representing organisations and their changes, as well as interactions of organisations is introduced. Organisations formally extend the general systems concept and suggest a novel perspective for addressing organised complexity phenomena as a collection of interacting organisations. View Full-Text
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kritz, M. From Systems to Organisations. Systems 2017, 5, 23.

AMA Style

Kritz M. From Systems to Organisations. Systems. 2017; 5(1):23.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kritz, Maurício. 2017. "From Systems to Organisations" Systems 5, no. 1: 23.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop