Previous Article in Journal
Leveraging Big Data Analytics Capability for Firm Innovativeness: The Role of Sustained Innovation and Organizational Slack
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Green Supplier Evaluation in E-Commerce Systems: An Integrated Rough-Dombi BWM-TOPSIS Approach

1
School of Economics & Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
2
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2025, 13(9), 731; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090731 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 July 2025 / Revised: 14 August 2025 / Accepted: 21 August 2025 / Published: 23 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Supply Chain Management)

Abstract

The rapid growth of e-commerce has created substantial environmental impacts, driving the need for advanced optimization models to enhance supply chain sustainability. As consumer preferences shift toward environmental responsibility, organizations must adopt robust quantitative methods to reduce ecological footprints while ensuring operational efficiency. This study develops a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to evaluate and prioritize green suppliers under uncertainty, integrating the rough-Dombi best–worst method (BWM) and an improved Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The proposed model addresses two key challenges: (1) inconsistency in expert judgments through rough set theory and Dombi aggregation operators and (2) ranking instability via an enhanced TOPSIS formulation that mitigates rank reversal. Mathematically, the rough-Dombi BWM leverages interval-valued rough numbers to model subjective expert preferences, while the Dombi operator ensures flexible and precise weight aggregation. The modified TOPSIS incorporates a dynamic distance metric to strengthen ranking robustness. A case study of five e-commerce suppliers validates the model’s effectiveness, with results identifying cost, green competitiveness, and external environmental management as the dominant evaluation dimensions. Key indicators—such as product price, pollution control, and green design—are rigorously prioritized using the proposed framework. Theoretical contributions include (1) a new rough-Dombi fusion for criteria weighting under uncertainty and (2) a stabilized TOPSIS variant with reduced sensitivity to data perturbations. Practically, the model provides e-commerce enterprises with a computationally efficient tool for sustainable supplier selection, enhancing resource allocation and green innovation. This study advances the intersection of uncertainty modeling, operational research, and sustainability analytics, offering scalable methodologies for mathematical decision-making in supply chain contexts.
Keywords: green supplier; e-commerce enterprises; rough-Dombi; BWM; rough-TOPSIS green supplier; e-commerce enterprises; rough-Dombi; BWM; rough-TOPSIS

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shao, Q.; Liu, S.; Lin, J.; Liou, J.J.H.; Zhu, D. Green Supplier Evaluation in E-Commerce Systems: An Integrated Rough-Dombi BWM-TOPSIS Approach. Systems 2025, 13, 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090731

AMA Style

Shao Q, Liu S, Lin J, Liou JJH, Zhu D. Green Supplier Evaluation in E-Commerce Systems: An Integrated Rough-Dombi BWM-TOPSIS Approach. Systems. 2025; 13(9):731. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shao, Qigan, Simin Liu, Jiaxin Lin, James J. H. Liou, and Dan Zhu. 2025. "Green Supplier Evaluation in E-Commerce Systems: An Integrated Rough-Dombi BWM-TOPSIS Approach" Systems 13, no. 9: 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090731

APA Style

Shao, Q., Liu, S., Lin, J., Liou, J. J. H., & Zhu, D. (2025). Green Supplier Evaluation in E-Commerce Systems: An Integrated Rough-Dombi BWM-TOPSIS Approach. Systems, 13(9), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop