Exploring Factors Influencing Student Performance and Educational Strategies in Logistics Management Contests: An ISM Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Academically speaking, to the best of our knowledge, our study is the first paper applying a system modeling approach and using ISM-MICMAC to explore the effects of factors and their inter-relationship on contest-based education in logistics management. By clarifying the complex behind multiple factors, we contribute to the existing literature by constructing the mechanisms of contest-based education in logistics management discipline. Also, our paper confirms the potentials of using system modelling approach in logistics management education studies, providing new thoughts on analytical methods for scholars in relevant fields for future research.
- Practically speaking, we provide educational plans as well as political suggestions for university teachers and higher education institutes for applying contest-based education in logistics management discipline, improving the quality of education and training. Also, our insights can support teachers or education agencies to combine other methods such as simulation-based learning or case-based learning with contest-based education to further enhance students’ learning effectiveness.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Education in Logistics Management
2.2. Contest-Based Education
3. Methodology
3.1. Factor Identification
3.2. ISM Analysis
3.3. MICMAC Analysis
4. Results Analysis
4.1. Critical Factors of Student Performance in Logistics Management Contests
4.2. ISM Analysis Results
4.3. MICMAC Analysis Results
5. Discussion of Educational Strategies
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Singh, M.; Jauhar, S.K.; Pant, M.; Paul, S.K. Modeling third-party reverse logistics for healthcare waste recycling in the post-pandemic era. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wrobel-Lachowska, M.; Polak-Sopinska, A.; Wisniewski, Z. Challenges for logistics education in Industry 4.0. In Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences, Orlando, Florida, USA, 21–25 July 2018; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 9, pp. 329–336. [Google Scholar]
- Lau, A.K.W. Teaching Supply Chain Management using a modified Beer Game: An action learning approach. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2015, 18, 62–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutz, H.; Birou, L. Logistics education: A look at the current state of the art and science. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2013, 18, 455–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammouriova, M.; Bertolini, M.; Castaneda, J.; Juan, A.A.; Neroni, M. A heuristic-based simulation for an education process to learn about optimization applications in logistics and Transportation. Mathematics 2022, 10, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cudney, E.; Kanigolla, D. Measuring the impact of project-based learning in Six sigma education. J. Enterp. Transform. 2014, 4, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutz, H.; Birou, L.; Walden, J. Survey of Graduate Supply Chain Courses: Content, coverage and gaps. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2022, 27, 625–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanakawa, N. Contest based learning with blending software engineering and Business Management: For students’ high motivation and high practice ability. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Florence, Italy, 16–24 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Lau, Y.-Y.; Ng, A.K.Y.; Tam, K.-C.; Chan, E.K. An investigation on the professionalization of education in Maritime Logistics and supply chains. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2018, 3, 394–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterman, J.D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jhan, Y.-C.; Luarn, P.; Lin, H.-W. Individual differences in digital game-based supply chains management learning: Evidence from Higher Vocational Education in Taiwan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perini, S.; Luglietti, R.; Margoudi, M.; Oliveira, M.; Taisch, M. Learning and motivational effects of digital game-based learning (DGBL) for manufacturing education—The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) game. Comput. Ind. 2018, 102, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angolia, M.G.; Pagliari, L.R. Experiential learning for logistics and supply chain management using an SAP ERP software simulation. Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ. 2018, 16, 104–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özpolat, K.; Chen, Y.; Hales, D.; Yu, D.; Yalcin, M.G. Using contests to provide business students Project-based learning in humanitarian logistics: PSAid example. Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ. 2014, 12, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grefenstette, J.J.; Kenneth, A.D.J.; Spears, W.M. Competition-Based Learning; The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; Volume 195. [Google Scholar]
- Burguillo, J.C. Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Comput. Educ. 2010, 55, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.; Yang, R. Action research on project-based learning and contest-based learning in higher education. In Proceedings of the 2021 International e-Engineering Education Services Conference (e-Engineering), Petra, Jordan, 22–23 June 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, H.-H.; Su, J.-H.; Lee, C.-S. A contest-oriented project for Learning Intelligent Mobile Robots. IEEE Trans. Educ. 2013, 56, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, M.K.; Tseng, M.-L.; Tan, K.H.; Bui, T.D. Knowledge management in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Improving performance through an interpretive structural modelling approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 806–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raut, R.; Narkhede, B.E.; Gardas, B.B.; Luong, H.T. An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing sustainable practices: The Indian oil and gas sector. Benchmarking 2018, 25, 1245–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.; Song, X.; Wu, Y.; Liao, S.; Zhang, X. Interpretive structural modeling based factor analysis on the implementation of emission trading system in the Chinese Building Sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 127, 214–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, X.; Chang, R.; Zuo, J.; Wen, T.; Zillante, G. Barriers to the transition towards off-site construction in China: An Interpretive structural modeling approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, G.; Haq, A.N. Analysis of interactions of criteria and sub-criteria for the selection of supplier in the built-in-order supply chain environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 3831–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.-H.; Chang, M.-C.; Liou, J.-R. Comparison of the effectiveness of Taiwanese College and high school students participating in creative contests. Think. Skills Creat. 2020, 38, 100717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frey, K.; Lüthje, C.; Haag, S. Whom should firms attract to open innovation platforms? The role of knowledge diversity and motivation. Long Range Plan. 2011, 44, 397–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ku, C.-J.; Hsu, Y.-S.; Chang, M.-C.; Lin, K.-Y. A model for examining middle school students’ stem integration behavior in a national technology competition. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2022, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Downes, E.P.; Gonzalez-Mulé, E.; Seong, J.Y.; Park, W. To collaborate or not? the moderating effects of team conflict on performance-prove goal orientation, collaboration, and Team Performance. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2021, 94, 568–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafael, B.G.; Sara, C.G.; Pina, P.; Miguel, J. Analysing teamwork in Higher Education: An empirical study on the antecedents and consequences of team cohesiveness. Stud. High. Educ. 2018, 44, 1153–1165. [Google Scholar]
- Burke, C.S.; Stagl, K.C.; Klein, C.; Goodwin, G.F.; Salas, E.; Halpin, S.M. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadersh. Q. 2006, 17, 288–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montes, L.F.J.; Moreno, R.A.; Morales, G.V. Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Examination. Technovation 2005, 25, 1159–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcott, B. Does teacher encouragement influence students’ educational progress? A propensity-score matching analysis. Res. High. Educ. 2017, 58, 773–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathi, M.; Ghobakhloo, M.; Syberfeldt, A. An interpretive structural modeling of teamwork training in Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coronas, T.T.; Oliva, M.A.; Luna, J.C.; Palma, A.M. Virtual teams in Higher Education: A review of factors affecting creative performance. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2015, 369, 629–637. [Google Scholar]
- Almulla, M.A. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Educ. 2023, 10, 2172929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stolz, R.C.; Blackmon, A.T.; Engerman, K.; Tonge, L.; McKayle, C.A. Poised for creativity: Benefits of exposing undergraduate students to creative problem-solving to moderate change in creative self-efficacy and academic achievement. J. Creat. 2022, 32, 100024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, M.I. Relationship between teamwork and team performance: Experiences from an ERPsim competition. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 2018, 29, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, K.; Narayan, A. Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educ. Psychol. 2014, 36, 236–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.B.; Hong, J.-C.; Chen, M.-L.; Ye, J.-N.; Tsai, C.-R. Relationship between students’ hands-on making self-efficacy, perceived value, cooperative attitude and competition preparedness in joining an ISTEAM contest. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2021, 41, 251–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, D.M.; Paretti, M.C. Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 2009, 34, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talib, F.; Rahman, Z.; Qureshi, M.N. An interpretive structural modelling approach for modelling the practices of Total Quality Management in service sector. Int. J. Model. Oper. Manag. 2011, 1, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azevedo, S.G.; Sequeira, T.; Santos, M.; Mendes, L. Biomass-related sustainability: A review of the literature and interpretive structural modeling. Energy 2019, 171, 1107–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sushil. Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2012, 13, 87–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Lin, Y. The effects of Supply Chain collaboration on Green Innovation Performance: An interpretive structural modeling analysis. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 2020, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaba, S.; Bhar, C. Analysing the barriers of Lean in Indian coal mining industry using integrated ISM-micmac and Sem. Benchmarking 2018, 25, 2145–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Z.; Jiao, X.; Xia, X.; Yu, H.; Lv, C. The relationship between academic encouragement and academic self-efficacy: A moderated mediation model. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 644243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guéguen, N.; Martin, A.; Andrea, C.R. “I am sure you’ll succeed”: When a teacher’s verbal encouragement of success increases children’s academic performance. Learn. Motiv. 2015, 52, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Hao, S. Research on Financing Risk Factors of Expressway REITs in China with a Hybrid Approach. Systems 2022, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Wang, H. Vulnerability Assessment for Port Logistics System Based on DEMATEL-ISM-BWM. Systems 2023, 11, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Factors | Sources |
---|---|
C1. Contestants’ grasp of knowledge in logistics management discipline | [24,25,26] |
C2. Contestants’ previous experience in academic contests | Summarized from interview |
C3. Team collaboration | [24,27,28] |
C4. Team leadership | [29,30] |
C5. Instructors’ encouragement | [31] |
C6. Instructors’ previous experience in instructing contests | [32] |
C7. Contestants’ expected benefits of participating contests | [17] |
C8. Institute support | [32] |
C9. Appropriateness of contest problem selection | [33] |
C10. Accuracy in understanding the selected contest problems | Summarized from interview |
C11. Appropriateness of applying logistics techniques in solving contest problems | Summarized from interview |
C12. Creative problem-solving ability | [34,35] |
C13. Effectiveness of communication between instructors and contestants | [36] |
C14. Task self-efficiency ability | [37] |
C15. The contestants’ amount of time and effort put into the contest | [36] |
C16. The instructors’ amount of time and effort put into the contest | Summarized from interview |
C17. Ability to work under pressure | [38] |
C18. Ability to integrate interdisciplinary knowledge | [24,39] |
C19. Health condition | Summarized from interview |
C20. Quality of the solutions for contest problems | Summarized from interview |
C21. Quality of the presentation of the contest problem solutions | Summarized from interview |
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 | C13 | C14 | C15 | C16 | C17 | C18 | C19 | C20 | C21 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
C2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
C3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
C4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
C6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
C10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
C11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
C21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 | C13 | C14 | C15 | C16 | C17 | C18 | C19 | C20 | C21 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
C20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
C21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Levels | Factors |
---|---|
Level 1 | C8, C20, C21 |
Level 2 | C7, C10, C12, C14, C15, C16, C17, C18 |
Level 3 | C1, C3, C9, C11, C19 |
Level 4 | C2, C4, C13 |
Level 5 | C5, C6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huang, S.; Cheng, H.; Luo, M. Exploring Factors Influencing Student Performance and Educational Strategies in Logistics Management Contests: An ISM Study. Systems 2024, 12, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020049
Huang S, Cheng H, Luo M. Exploring Factors Influencing Student Performance and Educational Strategies in Logistics Management Contests: An ISM Study. Systems. 2024; 12(2):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020049
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Shupeng, Hong Cheng, and Meiling Luo. 2024. "Exploring Factors Influencing Student Performance and Educational Strategies in Logistics Management Contests: An ISM Study" Systems 12, no. 2: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020049