Exploring the Critical Success Factors Influencing the Outcome of Digital Transformation Initiatives in Government Organizations
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Findings of the Literature Review
3.1. Organizational Hierarchy
3.2. Engagement in Digital Infrastructure
4. Critical Success Factors for Digital Transformation
4.1. Definition of Success in Digital Transformation
4.2. Critical Elements for Successful Digital Transformation
4.3. Complex Environment of Digital Transformation
4.4. Failure in Digital Transformation Initiatives
4.5. The Role of Organizational Culture
4.6. Technological Risks and Challenges
4.7. Broader Implications of Digital Transformation Failures
4.8. Perspectives on Critical Success Factors
4.9. Empirical Research Insights
5. Critical Success Factors for Conceptual Modeling
6. Aggregating and Modeling CSFs
6.1. Organizational Culture of Continuous Improvement (OCCI)
6.2. Stakeholder Engagement (SE)
6.3. Robust Leadership Governance (RG)
6.4. Adequate Resources and Learning (ARL)
6.5. Flexibility and Agility (FA)
6.6. Role of Organizational Readiness for Digital Transformation (ORDT)
7. Research Implications and Contributions
8. Conclusions and Future Investigation
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Åkesson, M.; Sorensen, C.; Eriksson, C.I. Ambidexterity under digitalization: A tale of two decades of new media at a Swedish newspaper. Scand. J. Manag. 2018, 34, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhassan, I.; Sammon, D.; Daly, M. Critical success factors for data governance: A telecommunications case study. J. Decis. Syst. 2019, 28, 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhamery, N.; Anwar Zainol, F.; Al-Nashmi, M. Conceptualizing the Role of Organizational Capabilities in Enhancing Firms Readiness for Digital Business Transformation. Int. J. Manag. 2020, 11, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alos-Simo, L.; Verdu-Jover, A.J.; Gomez-Gras, J.M. How transformational leadership facilitates e-business adoption. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 382–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andriole, S.J. Five myths about digital transformation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2017, 58, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.; Lai, Q.; He, J. Does digital technology enhance the global value chain position? Borsa Istanb. Rev. 2024, 24, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baiyere, A.; Salmela, H.; Tapanainen, T. Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2020, 29, 238–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banalieva, E.R.; Dhanaraj, C. Internalization theory for the digital economy. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2019, 50, 1372–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barann, B.; Hermann, A.; Cordes, A.K.; Chasin, F.; Becker, J. Supporting digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A procedure model involving publicly funded support units. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 8–11 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hämäläinen, M. A framework for a smart city design: Digital transformation in the Helsinki smart city. In Entrepreneurship and the Community: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Creativity, Social Challenges, and Business; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 63–86. [Google Scholar]
- Benavides, L.C.; Arias, J.T.; Burgos, D. Mistakes that limit the success of digital transformation in higher education institutions. In EDULEARN21 Proceedings, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Online Conference, 5–6 July 2021; IATED: Valencia, Spain; pp. 609–617.
- Anthony Jnr, B. Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture–A review and research agenda. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2021, 15, 299–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonanomi, M.M.; Hall, D.M.; Staub-French, S.; Tucker, A.; Talamo, C.M.L. The impact of digital transformation on formal and informal organizational structures of large architecture and engineering firms. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2019, 27, 872–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saldanha, T. Why Digital Transformations Fail: The Surprising Disciplines of How to Take off and Stay Ahead; Berrett-Koehler Publishers: Oakland, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Brock, J.K.U.; Von Wangenheim, F. Demystifying AI: What digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2019, 61, 110–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhl, A.; Schmidt-Keilich, M.; Muster, V.; Blazejewski, S.; Schrader, U.; Harrach, C.; Süßbauer, E. Design thinking for sustainability: Why and how design thinking can foster sustainability-oriented innovation development. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bürger, O.; Häckel, B.; Karnebogen, P.; Töppel, J. Estimating the impact of IT security incidents in digitized production environments. Decis. Support Syst. 2019, 127, 113–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canhoto, A.I.; Clear, F. Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caputo, A.; Pizzi, S.; Pellegrini, M.M.; Dabic, M. Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cennamo, C. Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 35, 265–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloomfield, B.P.; Coombs, R. Centralization and decentralization debate revisited. J. Manag. Stud. 1992, 29, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cichosz, M.; Wallenburg, C.M.; Knemeyer, A.M. Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020, 31, 209–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzenna, C. Digitalization and competitiveness in the logistics service industry. E-mentor 2018, 77, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
- Correani, A.; De Massis, A.; Frattini, F.; Petruzzelli, A.M.; Natalicchio, A. Implementing a digital strategy: Learning from the experience of three digital transformation projects. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2020, 62, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crittenden, A.B.; Crittenden, V.L.; Crittenden, W.F. The digitalization triumvirate: How incumbents survive. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crupi, A.; Del Sarto, N.; Di Minin, A.; Gregori, G.L.; Lepore, D.; Marinelli, L.; Spigarelli, F. The digital transformation of SMEs–a new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub. J. Knowl. Manag. 2020, 24, 1263–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, A.; Dey, S. Global manufacturing value networks: Assessing the critical roles of platform ecosystems and industry 4.0. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2021, 32, 1290–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, H.; Larsen, G.; Ford, J.; Akram, M. Female entrepreneurship and the metanarrative of economic growth: A critical review of underlying assumptions. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2019, 21, 24–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, W.; Ju, Y.; Dong, P.; Tiong, R.L.K. How to realize value creation of digital transformation? A system dynamics model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 244, 122667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Vaio, A.; Palladino, R.; Pezzi, A.; Kalisz, D.E. The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srai, J.S.; Graham, G.; Hennelly, P.; Phillips, W.; Kapletia, D.; Lorentz, H. Distributed manufacturing: A new form of localised production? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2020, 40, 697–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do Vale, G.; Collin-Lachaud, I.; Lecocq, X. Micro-level practices of bricolage during business model innovation process: The case of digital transformation towards omni-channel retailing. Scand. J. Manag. 2021, 37, 101154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dremel, C.; Herterich, M.M.; Wulf, J.; Waizmann, J.C.; Brenner, W. How AUDI AG established big data analytics in its digital transformation. MIS Q. Exec. 2017, 16, 81–100. [Google Scholar]
- Eden, R.; Jones, A.B.; Casey, V.; Draheim, M. Digital transformation requires workforce transformation. MIS Q. Exec. 2018, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Sawy, O.A.; Malhotra, A.; Gosain, S.; Young, K.M. IT-Intensive value innovation in the electronic economy: Insights from marshall industries. MIS Q. 1999, 23, 305–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eller, R.; Alford, P.; Kallmunzer, A.; Peters, M. Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 112, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magistretti, S.; Sanasi, S.; Dell’Era, C.; Ghezzi, A. Entrepreneurship as design: A design process for the emergence and development of entrepreneurial opportunities. Creat. Innov. Manag. 2023, 32, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke, H.; Foerstl, K. Fostering integrated research on organizational politics and conflict in teams: A cross-phenomenal review. Eur. Manag. J. 2018, 36, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebauer, H.; Fleisch, E.; Lamprecht, C.; Wortmann, F. Growth paths for overcoming the digitalization paradox. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gertzen, W.M.; Van Der Lingen, E.; Steyn, H. Goals and benefits of digital transformation projects: Insights into project selection criteria. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 2022, 25, 4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghobakhloo, M. Determinants of information and digital technology implementation for smart manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 2384–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Yang, J.; Shi, X. Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Gov. Inf. Q. 2020, 37, 101487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Yang, X. Understanding strategies for digital government transformation: A strategic action fields perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2024, 76, 102766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindarajan, V.; Immelt, J.R. The manufacturers only way can survive. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2019, 60, 24–33. [Google Scholar]
- Grabher, G.; Van Tuijl, E. Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms. Environ. Plan. A 2020, 52, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gregory, R.W.; Kaganer, E.; Henfridsson, O.; Ruch, T.J. IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Q. 2018, 42, 1225–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guenzi, P.; Nijssen, E.J. The impact of digital transformation on salespeople: An empirical investigation using the JD-R model. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2021, 41, 130–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guinan, P.J.; Parise, S.; Langowitz, N. Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurbaxani, V.; Dunkle, D. Gearing up for successful digital transformation. MIS Q. Exec. 2019, 18, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurcan, F.; Ayaz, A.; Menekse Dalveren, G.G.; Derawi, M. Business Intelligence Strategies, Best Practices, and Latest Trends: Analysis of Scientometric Data from 2003 to 2023 Using Machine Learning. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurcan, F.; Boztas, G.D.; Dalveren, G.G.M.; Derawi, M. Digital Transformation Strategies, Practices, and Trends: A Large-Scale Retrospective Study Based on Machine Learning. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hai, T.N.; Van, Q.N.; Thi Tuyet, M.N. Digital transformation: Opportunities and challenges for leaders in the emerging countries in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg. Sci. J. 2021, 5, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanelt, A.; Bohnsack, R.; Marz, D.; Marante, C.A. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 58, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, S.L.N. Can Central Bank Digital currencies be green and sustainable? Green Financ. 2023, 5, 603–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henfridsson, O.; Mathiassen, L.; Svahn, F. Managing technological change in the digital age: The role of architectural frames. J. Inf. Technol. 2014, 29, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heracleous, L.; Gledhill, D. Why Digital Transformation May Fail—And What Can Be Done About It. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 2023, 60, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holotiuk, F.; Beimborn, D. Critical success factors of digital business strategy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 12–15 February 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Horváth, D.; Szabó, R.Z. Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 146, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonathan, G.M. Digital transformation in the public sector: Identifying critical success factors. In Proceedings of the Information Systems: 16th European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference, EMCIS 2019, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 9–10 December 2019; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Proceedings 16; pp. 223–235. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, M.D.; Hutcheson, S.; Camba, J.D. Past, present, and future barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: A review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 60, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamalaldin, A.; Linde, L.; Sjödin, D.; Parida, V. Transforming provider- customer relationships in digital servitization: A relational view on digitalization. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 89, 306–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Long, G.; Li, S. Research on measurement and disequilibrium of manufacturing digital transformation: Based on the text mining data of A-share listed companies. Data Sci. Financ. Econ 2023, 3, 30–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazim, F.A. Digital transformation and leadership style: A multiple case study. ISM J. Int. Bus. 2019, 3, 24–33. [Google Scholar]
- Kohli, R.; Melville, N.P. Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Inf. Syst. J. 2019, 29, 200–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohtamäki, M.; Parida, V.; Patel, P.C.; Gebauer, H. The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 151, 119804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolloch, M.; Dellermann, D. Digital innovation in the energy industry: The impact of controversies on the evolution of innovation ecosystems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 136, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraus, S.; Schiavone, F.; Pluzhnikova, A.; Invernizzi, A.C. Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kretschmer, T.; Khashabi, P. Digital transformation and organization design: An integrated approach. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2020, 62, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kretschmer, T.; Leiponen, A.; Schilling, M.; Vasudeva, G. Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strateg. Manag. J. 2022, 43, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Tsolakis, N.; Agarwal, A.; Srai, J.S. Developing distributed manufacturing strategies from the perspective of a product-process matrix. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 219, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kutnjak, A.; Pihiri, I.; Furjan, M.T. Digital transformation case studies across industries—Literature review. In Proceedings of the 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 20–24 May 2019; IEEE: New York, NY, USA; pp. 1293–1298.
- Lanzolla, G.; Pesce, D.; Tucci, C.L. The digital transformation of search and recombination in the innovation function: Tensions and an integrative framework. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2021, 38, 90–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legner, C.; Eymann, T.; Hess, T.; Matt, C.; Böhmann, T.; Drews, P.; Mädche, A.; Urbach, N.; Ahlemann, F. Digitalization: Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017, 59, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leyh, C.; Köppel, K.; Neuschl, S.; Pentrack, M. Analysis of Critical Success Factors for Successfully Conducting Digitalization Projects. In Information Technology for Management: Business and Social Issues, Proceedings of the 16th Conference, ISM 2021, and FedCSIS-AIST 2021 Track, Held as Part of FedCSIS 2021, Virtual Event, 2–5 September 2021; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar]
- Linde, L.; Frishammar, J.; Parida, V. Revenue models for digital servitization: A value capture framework for designing, developing, and scaling digital services. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2021, 70, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loebbecke, C.; Picot, A. Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2015, 24, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lumineau, F.; Wang, W.; Schilke, O. Blockchain governance—A new way of organizing collaborations? Organ. Sci. 2021, 32, 500–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magistretti, S.; Dell’Era, C.; Petruzzelli, A.M. How intelligent is watson? Enabling digital transformation through artificial intelligence. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumder, M.; Gupta, S.; Paul, J. Perceived usefulness of online customer reviews: A review mining approach using machine learning & exploratory data analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 150, 147–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guenzi, P.; Habel, J. Mastering the digital transformation of sales. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2020, 62, 57–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manfreda, A.; Štemberger, M.I. Establishing a partnership between top and IT managers: A necessity in an era of digital transformation. Inf. Technol. People 2018, 32, 948–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Martín, A.; Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Delgado López-Cózar, E. Google scholar, Web of science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J. Informetr. 2018, 12, 1160–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehadeh, M.; Atta, A.; Barrak, T.; Lutfi, A.; Alrawad, M. Digital transformation: An empirical analysis of operational efficiency, customer experience, and competitive advantage in Jordanian Islamic banks. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024, 12, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matarazzo, M.; Penco, L.; Profumo, G.; Quaglia, R. Digital transformation and customer value creation in made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 642–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathieu, J.; Maynard, T.M.; Rapp, T.; Gilson, L. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Manag. 2008, 34, 410–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehadjebia, N.; Halimi, L.; Mekerkeb, A.T. The UAE’s Strategy to Improve the Attractiveness of the Investment Climate. Tech. Soc. Sci. J. 2023, 39, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendes, J.A.J.; Carvalho, N.G.P.; Mourarias, M.N.; Careta, C.B.; Zuin, V.G.; Gerolamo, M.C. Dimensions of digital transformation in the context of modern agriculture. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 34, 613–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menz, M.; Kunisch, S.; Birkinshaw, J.; Collis, D.J.; Foss, N.J.; Hoskisson, R.E.; Prescott, J.E. Corporate strategy and the theory of the firm in the digital age. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 58, 1695–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Met, İ.; Uysal, E.U.; Özkaya, K.S.; Orç, E. Key success factors for strategic management in digital business. In Digital Business Strategies in Blockchain Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 283–304. [Google Scholar]
- Mia, M.M.; Majri, Y.; Rahman, I.K.A. Covariance based-structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) using AMOS in management research. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 21, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
- Moktadir, M.A.; Kumar, A.; Ali, S.M.; Paul, S.K.; Sultana, R.; Rezaei, J. Critical success factors for a circular economy: Implications for business strategy and the environment. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 3611–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of Web of science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morakanyane, R.; O’Reilly, P.; McAvoy, J.; Grace, A. Determining digital transformation success factors. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Mosch, P.; Schweikl, S.; Obermaier, R. Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 236, 108141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rueckel, D.; Muehlburger, M.; Koch, S. An updated framework of factors enabling digital transformation. Pac. Asia J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2020, 12, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Nachit, H.; Jaafari, M.; El Fikri, I.; Belhcen, L. Digital transformation in the Moroccan public sector: Drivers and barriers. SSRN 2021, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagaraj, A. Information seeding and knowledge production in online communities: Evidence from openstreetmap. Manag. Sci. 2021, 67, 4908–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nambisan, S.; Lyytinen, K.; Majchrzak, A.; Song, M. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q. 2017, 41, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nambisan, S.; Wright, M.; Feldman, M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Res. Policy 2019, 48, 103773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nell, P.C.; Foss, N.J.; Klein, P.G.; Schmitt, J. Avoiding digitalization traps: Tools for top managers. Bus. Horiz. 2021, 64, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nonet, G.; Gössling, T.; Van Tulder, R.; Bryson, J.M. Multi-stakeholder Engagement for the Sustainable Development Goals: Introduction to the Special Issue. J. Bus. Ethics 2022, 180, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oludapo, S.; Carroll, N.; Helfert, M. Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 174, 114528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osmundsen, K.; Iden, J.; Bygstad, B. Digital Transformation: Drivers, Success Factors, and Implications. In MCIS 2018 Proceedings; MCIS: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 2018; p. 37. [Google Scholar]
- Paiola, M.; Gebauer, H. Internet of things technologies, digital servitization and business model innovation in BtoB manufacturing firms. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 89, 245–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palaskas, A. Exploring Digital Transformation in Public Healthcare: Drivers, Success Factors, and Challenges. Master’s Thesis, International Hellenic University, Nea Moudania, Greece, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Panchyrz, L.; Karumuri, M. Challenges with Organizing for Digital Transformation in International Manufacturing Networks. Master’s Thesis, Mälardalens University, Västerås, Sweden, 2021. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1597248/FULLTEXT01 (accessed on 25 October 2024).
- Park, Y.; Pavlou, P.A.; Saraf, N. Configurations for achieving organizational ambidexterity with digitization. Inf. Syst. Res. 2020, 31, 1376–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Criado, A.R. The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? Int. Bus. Rev. 2020, 9, 101717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Lim, W.M.; O’Cass, A.; Hao, A.W.; Bresciani, S. Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, O1–O16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesce, D.; Neirotti, P.; Paolucci, E. When culture meets digital platforms: Value creation and stakeholders’ alignment in big data use. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019, 22, 1883–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purwanto, A.; Purba, J.T.; Sijabat, R.; Bernarto, I. The role of transformational leadership, organizational citizenship behaviour, innovative work behaviour, quality work life, digital transformation and leader member exchange on universities performance. Linguist. Antverp. 2021, 2908–2932. [Google Scholar]
- Rahmati, P.; Tafti, A.; Westland, J.C.; Hidalgo, C. When all products are digital: Complexity and intangible value in the ecosystem of digitizing firms. MIS Q. 2021, 45, 1025–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikki, N.; Aripin, Z.; Fitrianti, N.G. Business innovation and critical Success factors in digital transformation and challenging times: An econometric analysis of startup viability and success. Kriez Acad. J. Dev. Community Serv. 2024, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Mandava, H. Critical Success Factors of Cloud ERP in the Enterprise Business. Univers. J. Comput. Sci. Commun. 2024, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, J.; Amorim, M.; Melão, N.; Matos, P. Digital transformation: A literature review and guidelines for future research. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; Volume 745, pp. 411–421. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Lluesma, C.; García-Ruiz, P.; Pinto-Garay, J. The digital transformation of work: A relational view. Bus. Ethics 2021, 30, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohn, D.; Bican, P.M.; Brem, A.; Kraus, S.; Clauss, T. Digital platform-based business models–An exploration of critical success factors. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2021, 60, 101625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, M.; Festa, G.; Devalle, A.; Mueller, J. When corporations get disruptive, the disruptive get corporate: Financing disruptive technologies through corporate venture capital. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 118, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossini, M.; Cifone, F.D.; Kassem, B.; Costa, F.; Portioli-Staudacher, A. Being lean: How to shape digital transformation in the manufacturing sector. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2021, 32, 239–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saarikko, T.; Westergren, U.H.; Blomquist, T. Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 825–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadowski, J. The Internet of landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism. Antipode 2020, 52, 562–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schallmo, D.; Williams, C.A.; Boardman, L. Digital transformation of business models—Best practice, enablers, and roadmap. In Digital Disruptive Innovation; World Scientific Pub Co., Inc.: Singapore, 2020; pp. 119–138. [Google Scholar]
- Schallmo, D.; Williams, C.A.; Boardman, L. Digital transformation of business models-best practice, enablers, and roadmap. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2017, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, P. Managerial challenges of industry 4.0: An empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2018, 12, 803–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schorsch, T.; Wallenburg, C.M.; Wieland, A. The human factor in SCM: Introducing a meta-theory of behavioral supply chain management. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017, 47, 238–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwertner, K. Digital transformation of business. Trakia J. Sci. 2017, 15, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seran, T.; Bez, S.M. Open innovation’s “multiunit back-end problem”: How corporations can overcome business unit rivalry. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2021, 63, 135–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siachou, E.; Vrontis, D.; Trichina, E. Can traditional organizations be digitally transformed by themselves? The moderating role of absorptive capacity and strategic interdependence. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 124, 408–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şimşek, T.; Öner, M.A.; Kunday, Ö.; Olcay, G.A. A journey towards a digital platform business model: A case study in a global tech-company. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 175, 121372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sjödin, D.; Parida, V.; Kohtamäki, M.; Wincent, J. An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 112, 478–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sklyar, A.; Kowalkowski, C.; Tronvoll, B.; Sorhammar, D. Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P.; Beretta, M. The gordian knot of practicing digital transformation: Coping with emergent paradoxes in ambidextrous organizing structures. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2021, 38, 166–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, M.J.; Rocha, Á. Digital learning: Developing skills for digital transformation of organizations. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 91, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srai, J.S.; Harrington, T.S.; Tiwari, M.K. Characteristics of redistributed manufacturing systems: A comparative study of emerging industry supply networks. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 6936–6955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Struyf, B.; Galvani, S.; Matthyssens, P.; Bocconcelli, R. Toward a multilevel perspective on digital servitization. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2021, 41, 668–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Study on Poverty and Income Inequality in the Context of the Digital Transformation. 25 March 2024. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 30 October 2024. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/320f5f62-eb3b-11ee-bf53-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Teichert, R. Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2019, 67, 1673–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.C.; Tenório, N.; Pinto, D.; Matta, N.; da Cruz Urpia, A.G.B. The critical success factors’ investigation during knowledge management implementation within SME enterprises: A Participatory Design opportunity. SN Comput. Sci. 2023, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tijan, E.; Jović, M.; Aksentijević, S.; Pucihar, A. Digital transformation in the maritime transport sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 170, 120879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreenivasan, A.; Suresh, M. Digital transformation in start-ups: A bibliometric analysis. Digit. Transform. Soc. 2023, 2, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tortorella, G.L.; Fogliatto, F.S.; Tlapa Mendoza, D.; Pepper, M.; Capurro, D. Digital transformation of health services: A value stream-oriented approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 1814–1828. [Google Scholar]
- Trantopoulos, K.; Von Krogh, G.; Wallin, M.; Woerter, M. External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. MIS Q. 2017, 41, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tronvoll, B.; Sklyar, A.; Sörhammar, D.; Kowalkowski, C. Transformational shifts through digital servitization. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 89, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsolkanakis, D. Digital Transformation in the Greek Public Sector-Identifying Drivers and Barriers. Master’s Thesis, International Hellenic University, Thermi, Greece, 2022. Available online: https://repository.ihu.edu.gr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11544/29976/Digital%20Transformation%20in%20the%20Greek%20public%20sector-Identifying%20drivers%20and%20barriers.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 25 October 2024).
- van Dyk, R.; Van Belle, J.P. Drivers and challenges for digital transformation in the South African retail industry. In Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions: Proceedings of the 17th Conference, AITM 2019, and 14th Conference, ISM 2019, Held as Part of FedCSIS, Leipzig, Germany, 1–4 September 2019; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 42–62. [Google Scholar]
- Vanneste, B.S.; Puranam, P.; Kretschmer, T. Trust over time in exchange relationships: Meta-analysis and theory. Strateg. Manag. J. 2014, 35, 1891–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Broekhuizen, T.; Bart, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Qi Dong, J.; Fabian, N.; Haenlein, M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schumacher, C.; Eggers, F.; Verhoef, P.C.; Maas, P. Data analysis for digital transformation: The example of willingness to share personal information. In A Research Agenda for Digital Transformation; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2024; pp. 281–326. [Google Scholar]
- Vial, G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. In Managing Digital Transformation; Routledge: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Vogelsang, K.; Liere-Netheler, K.; Packmohr, S.; Hoppe, U. Success factors for fostering a digital transformation in manufacturing companies. J. Enterp. Transform. 2018, 8, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volberda, H.W.; Khanagha, S.; Baden-Fuller, C.; Mihalache, O.R.; Birkinshaw, J. Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing new organizational forms. Long Range Plan. 2021, 54, 102110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, K.S.R.; Wäger, M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Plan. 2019, 52, 326–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weking, J.; Stöcker, M.; Kowalkiewicz, M.; Böhm, M.; Krcmar, H. Leveraging industry 4.0—A business model pattern framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 225, 107588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Werth, O.; Schwarzbach, C.; Rodríguez Cardona, D.; Breitner, M.H.; Graf von der Schulenburg, J.M. Influencing factors for the digital transformation in the financial services sector. Z. Für Die Gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 2020, 109, 155–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westerman, G.; Bonnet, D. Revamping your business through digital transformation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2015, 56, 2–5. [Google Scholar]
- Westerman, G.; Soule, D.L.; Eswaran, A. Building digital-ready culture in traditional organizations. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2019, 60, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Wieland, A.; Handfield, R.B.; Durach, C.F. Mapping the landscape of future research themes in supply chain management. J. Bus. Logist. 2016, 37, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiesböck, F.; Hess, T. Digital innovations: Embedding in organizations. Electron. Mark. 2020, 30, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Authors (Year) | Contributions | Findings/Conclusions |
---|---|---|
[55] | Digital business strategy (DBS) framework | The study develops a DBS framework through a structured review of industry reports, offering specific actions for DBS and digital business model design. |
[23] | Opportunities of DT in business | Digital businesses integrate technologies such as social, mobile, analytics/big data, and cloud to transform how they work. A clear digital strategy and risk-taking are crucial for success. |
[13] | Reasons for failure in digital transformation | One of the main reasons why DT fails is the lack of clearly defined goals and a detailed digital strategy. |
[33] | Factors for the perceived benefit of DT in manufacturing | Collaboration and cultural shifts are key for DT success, involving customers, suppliers, and peers. |
[32] | Influencing factors for the success of DT | By reviewing empirical contributions, the study offers insights into why organizations undergo DT, how to achieve it, and its impact. |
[24] | Key success factors for digitalization in public organizations | The study, based on interviews with public sector leaders, identifies key success factors for digitalization in public organizations, offering valuable insights for effective DT initiatives. |
[56] | Success factors for successful DT practices | A list of seven success factors and 23 subfactors emerged from the thematic groupings, constituting the initial steps toward building a DT framework. |
[98] | Influencing factors for the success of DT in financial services | The study unveils the factors that influence the success of DT, focusing on modernizing backend systems and the threat of BigTech. |
[99] | Key success factors for DT start-ups | The study underscores five key success factors: lean customer orientation, entrepreneurial culture, ecosystem participation, third-party tech integration, and capital acquisition. |
[100] | Six key success factors for platform-based business models | The study identifies key success factors in the business model of digital platforms in the metal and steel industry using qualitative interviews and modified concepts. |
[101] | Factors influencing business innovation | Through a literature review, the study identifies strategies for business innovation amid uncertainties, exploring critical success factors for valuable insights. |
[102] | Approaches to DT in international manufacturing networks | The study shows case companies’ approaches to DT in their networks, emphasizing the importance of a holistic perspective and identifying challenges. |
[103] | CRM digitalization framework | The proposed framework provides practical guidance for identification, monitoring, and maximizing benefits. It is validated via a national internet and TV service company. |
[72] | Ten significant critical success factors for digital transformation | As a result of surveying German companies, key DT project CSFs are identified: corporate organization, technology, emphasizing culture, top management support, and unified digital strategy. |
[104] | Critical success factors for successful digital partnering | Digital partnering necessitates trust, management support, careful selection, common goals, commitment, communication, conflict resolution, and digital training, improving survival in the dynamic digital landscape, especially in developing countries. |
[105] | Factors influencing digital transformation | The study focuses on factors influencing DT in a globalized context, highlighting the difference between digitalization and digitization. |
[102] | Factors affecting DT in public healthcare | The study aggregates information on drivers, success factors, and challenges in public healthcare DT, providing a starting point for future research. |
[106] | Factors for DT success in the Greek public sector | The study lists drivers and barriers that hinder DT success in the Greek public sector. |
[107] | Factors for DT success in the public sector | The study identifies 11 key factors, including communication, leadership skills, and resistance to change, for DT success in the public sector. |
[108] | Start-up survival factors in the digital era | Found the importance of innovation and risk management. |
[109] | Crucial factors in ERP deployment for enterprise business | Insights for success or failure in ERP adoption. |
[81] | Influence of digital transformation in Islamic banking | Found impact on operational efficiency and risk management. |
No | Critical Success Factors for Digital Transformation | Authors |
---|---|---|
1 | Innovation culture | [22,23,24,25,26,27] |
2 | Embracing change | |
3 | Collaboration and teamwork | |
4 | Learning and development | [16,19,44,56,63] |
5 | Customer-centricity | |
6 | Clear communication | |
7 | Data-driven decision-making | |
8 | Digital-minded leadership | [33,55] |
9 | Stakeholders involvment | |
10 | Stakeholder identification | |
11 | Active engagement | |
12 | Collaboration and partnership | [21,64,73] |
13 | Inclusion | |
14 | Continuous engagement | |
15 | Measuring progress and evaluating success | |
16 | Effective change management | [44,86] |
17 | Clear governance structure | |
18 | Executive sponsorship | |
19 | Risk management | [33,34,35,65] |
20 | Compliance with laws and regulations | |
21 | Data governance | |
22 | Compliance with industry standards | |
23 | IT governance | |
24 | Performance measurement | |
25 | Funding | [103,104,105,106,107,112,113,114] |
26 | Technology | |
27 | Skilled workforce | |
28 | Infrastructure | |
29 | Training and development | [13,15,19,27] |
30 | Data analytics | |
31 | Cloud computing | |
32 | Security | |
33 | Adaptability | |
34 | Agile methodologies | [76,83] |
35 | Continuous improvement | |
36 | Innovation | |
37 | Scalability | |
38 | Resilience | |
39 | Cross-functional teams | [14,18,77,82] |
40 | Flexible resources | |
41 | Willingness to embrace technological change | |
42 | Employee digital skills and competencies | |
43 | Organizational adaptability | [23,63,88] |
44 | Resource allocation for digital initiatives | |
45 | Stakeholder involvement and support | |
46 | Organizational change management | |
47 | Achievement of objectives | |
48 | User satisfaction and adoption | [56,66,73] |
49 | Impact on operational efficiency | |
50 | Business performance enhancements | |
51 | Digital integration and connectivity | |
52 | Employee empowerment and collaboration | [22,36,72] |
53 | Long-term sustainability and adaptability |
Dimension | Description | CSFs Affecting DT Success |
---|---|---|
Organizational culture of continuous improvement (OCCI) | OCCI in DT initiatives cultivate a culture of continuous learning, innovation, and adaptability. This culture encourages employees to actively contribute to the transformation process, fostering enhanced agility and long-term success |
|
Stakeholder engagement (SE) | SE in DT initiatives entail active involvement and collaboration with relevant stakeholders. This ensures their feedback is considered, fostering support, shared ownership, and driving sustainable transformation |
|
Robust leadership governance (RG) | RG in DT involve strong, effective leadership guiding the organization’s digital journey with clear goals and strategies. It fosters a shared vision, commitment to change, and effective challenge and risk management. RG promotes alignment, accountability, and collaboration for a smooth DT implementation, delivering value and sustainable transformation |
|
Adequate resources and learning (ARL) | ARL for DT initiatives involve allocating sufficient financial and human resources and focusing on continuous learning and development. This includes investing in technology, training in digital skills, and providing ongoing learning opportunities to ensure the organization has the capabilities and knowledge to drive innovation and achieve sustainable growth in the digital era |
|
Flexibility and agility (FA) | FA in DT initiatives reflect an organization’s capacity to swiftly adapt to evolving challenges and opportunities. It fosters a culture of experimentation, change, and innovation, enabling quick adjustments to strategies, processes, and technologies, ensuring competitiveness and readiness in a rapidly changing digital landscape |
|
Role of organizational readiness for digital transformation (RORDT) | ORDT assesses an organization’s preparedness for DT, ensuring a smooth transition and enabling innovation |
|
Digital transformation initiatives success | DT initiatives integrate advanced technologies for growth, efficiency, and improved customer experiences through AI, analytics, and automation |
|
Dimension | Description | Role in the Model |
---|---|---|
Organizational culture of continuous improvement (OCCI) | Cultivating an environment that promotes ongoing improvement and innovation. | Independent variable |
Stakeholder engagement (SE) | Actively involving stakeholders in the transformation process to ensure buy-in and support. | Independent variable |
Robust leadership governance (RG) | Establishing strong leadership and governance structures to guide transformation efforts. | Independent variable |
Flexibility and agility (FA) | The ability of an organization to adapt quickly to changes in the environment or market. | Independent variable |
Adequate resources and learning (AR) | Ensuring that sufficient resources (financial, human, technological) are available while promoting continuous learning. | Independent variable |
Role of organizational readiness for digital transformation (ORDT) | The extent to which an organization is prepared for digital transformation initiatives. | Mediator |
Digital transformation initiatives success (DTIS) | The outcomes of digital transformation efforts, measuring their success. | Dependent variable |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Al Maazmi, A.; Piya, S.; Araci, Z.C. Exploring the Critical Success Factors Influencing the Outcome of Digital Transformation Initiatives in Government Organizations. Systems 2024, 12, 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120524
Al Maazmi A, Piya S, Araci ZC. Exploring the Critical Success Factors Influencing the Outcome of Digital Transformation Initiatives in Government Organizations. Systems. 2024; 12(12):524. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120524
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl Maazmi, Abdalla, Sujan Piya, and Zehra Canan Araci. 2024. "Exploring the Critical Success Factors Influencing the Outcome of Digital Transformation Initiatives in Government Organizations" Systems 12, no. 12: 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120524
APA StyleAl Maazmi, A., Piya, S., & Araci, Z. C. (2024). Exploring the Critical Success Factors Influencing the Outcome of Digital Transformation Initiatives in Government Organizations. Systems, 12(12), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120524