Next Article in Journal
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A Insecticidal Toxins and Their Digests Do Not Stimulate Histamine Release from Cultured Rat Mast Cells
Previous Article in Journal
The History of the Brazilian Sardine (Sardinella brasiliensis) Between Two Fishery Collapses: An Ecosystem Modeling Approach to Study Its Life Cycle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Grassland Habitats on Acridoidea (Orthoptera) Species Diversity in Different Divisions of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps

Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Oasis Agricultural Pest Management and Plant Protection Resources Utilization, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2025, 14(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14010014
Submission received: 6 December 2024 / Revised: 25 December 2024 / Accepted: 26 December 2024 / Published: 27 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Conservation Biology and Biodiversity)

Simple Summary

This study investigated Acridoidea (Orthoptera) species and grasshoppers in the grasslands managed by the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps from 2022 to 2024. We collected 5290 specimens from eight families, 37 genera, and 83 species using the netting method. Acridoidea were most abundant in mountain meadows and temperate grasslands, with 42 and 43 species found, respectively. The diversity of Acridoidea was highest in temperate grasslands and mountain meadows. Diversity was also influenced by altitude, with the highest diversity found at elevations between 1000 and 1500 m. Factors such as temperature, precipitation, and soil erodibility were found to significantly affect Acridoidea habitats and populations. This study shows that grassland types, elevation, and environmental conditions play a key role in shaping locust distribution and abundance.

Abstract

In this study, we investigated Acridoidea species and their populations in the grasslands managed by 13 divisions of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (hereafter referred to as the Corps) during 2022–2024. We analyzed how the Corps’ grassland habitats influenced Acridoidea diversity. Using the netting method, we collected 5290 Acridoidea specimens, representing eight families, 37 genera, and 83 species. The Acridoidea were most abundant in mountain meadows and temperate grasslands, with 42 and 43 species, respectively, while the species richness in temperate desert grasslands and temperate steppe desert grasslands was comparably high. The highest diversity index of Acridoidea was recorded in temperate grasslands (3.053), followed by mountain meadows (2.563). Regarding altitude, the diversity index was highest in the 1000–1500 m range (3.237), followed by 500–1000 m (2.976) and 1500–2000 m (2.867). However, above 1500 m, the diversity index began to decline. The Acridoidea species diversity was significantly positively correlated with the average temperatures of the wettest and warmest seasons, as well as with precipitation levels during the wettest and driest months. The dominant grassland Acridoidea species were primarily distributed in areas with low-to-medium-low soil erodibility. These findings indicate that grassland types, elevation, temperature, humidity, and soil erodibility significantly influence Acridoidea habitats, survival, reproduction, and feeding behaviors, ultimately shaping their composition, distribution, and abundance across different habitats.

1. Introduction

Grasslands, as one of the predominant vegetation types in Xinjiang, cover a total area of 57.26 × 10⁶ hectares, representing 34% of the region’s total land area. In recent decades, Acridoidea damage in Xinjiang has escalated, with infestations affecting 8.5% of the available natural grassland area [1]. Among the 18 major grassland types identified in China, Xinjiang hosts 11, namely lowland meadows, temperate deserts, temperate steppe deserts, temperate desert grasslands, temperate steppes, temperate meadow grasslands, mountain meadows, alpine deserts, alpine grasslands, alpine meadows, and marshes [2].
The altitude in Xinjiang exhibits significant complexity, encompassing diverse landforms such as high mountains, basins, and deserts. In the northern region, including cities such as Urumqi and Shihezi, the elevation is relatively low, generally ranging from a few hundred to around one thousand meters. In contrast, the southern mountainous regions, such as the Pamir Plateau, have considerably higher elevations, averaging over 4500 m. Geographically located deep within Asia and far from the ocean, Xinjiang is surrounded by high mountains that block the influx of oceanic humid air currents, resulting in a hot and arid temperate continental climate. The average annual temperature in Xinjiang, influenced by geographic location, topography, and climatic factors, is approximately 7.6 °C [3]. Northern Xinjiang generally experiences lower annual temperatures compared to the region’s overall average, while southern Xinjiang has higher temperatures [4]. Xinjiang also features diverse soil types, although soil desertification is a prominent issue. The main soil types include brown desert soil, brown calcium soil, and gray-brown desert soil [5,6]. Variations in water and thermal resources across the region have given rise to diverse habitat types, which significantly influence the composition and diversity of Acridoidea communities [7].
Research on Acridoidea species diversity in Xinjiang began in the mid-1950s. With increasing focus on the distribution of Acridoidea in this region, new species have been continuously identified [8]. By 2012, records indicated 171 Acridoidea species belonging to eight families and 65 genera in Xinjiang [9]. Numerous studies have shown that the regional distribution of Acridoidea in Xinjiang exhibits distinct spatial and zonal patterns. Northern Xinjiang, particularly regions such as Altay, Tacheng, Boltara, Ili, and Changji, harbors a greater diversity and abundance of Acridoidea species compared to southern Xinjiang [10]. Conversely, southern Xinjiang is characterized by relatively fewer species. The distribution of Acridoidea species in Xinjiang is strongly influenced by ecological and geographical factors, including altitude, soil composition, and vegetation types [11]. Each zone displays unique characteristics in Acridoidea distribution patterns. Based on Xinjiang’s unique eco-geographical zones, topography, grassland resources, and vegetation characteristics, the grassland of this region can be classified into eight subzones. Each subzone supports distinct dominant Acridoidea species adapted to specific habitats, including variations in grassland type, vegetation, and altitude. Prolonged habitation within specific eco-geographical zones has led to consistent eco-physiological traits, behaviors, and morphological adaptations in different Acridoidea species. These adaptations further validate the dynamic interaction between Acridoidea and their habitats [12,13,14]. However, research reports on a wide variety of insects are very limited [15,16]; especially, studies on the relationship between Orthoptera Acridoidea and environmental factors in Xinjiang have not been reported.
In this study, we identified the species of Acridoidea and clarified the dominant species in each division of the Corps. The analysis of Acridoidea species diversity in the grasslands managed by the Corps was carried out using various methods, and the correlations between Acridoidea diversity and grassland type and altitude were examined. The influence of the soil erodibility factor on the distribution of the dominant species of grassland Acridoidea and the influence of ecological factors (temperature and rainfall) on species diversity were also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Survey Methodology

2.1.1. Survey Methodology and Study Period

This study primarily employed the treadmill survey method, which is a technique often used in ecological and environmental studies, particularly when conducting surveys or assessments of species diversity or behavior in a specific area. It typically involves systematically walking through a study area while recording observations, such as species sightings, behaviors, or environmental conditions, over a defined route or transect. This was conducted June–August for three consecutive years, 2022–2024, in accordance with the biological characteristics of Acridoidea occurrence (the period of Acridoidea outbreak).

2.1.2. Setting Up Investigation Sites for Trekking

In accordance with the 2021 National Grassland Pest Census Implementation Plan (printed version), routes for transect walks and investigation sites were planned based on the life and habitat of the types of Acridoidea within the Corps’ jurisdiction, which correspond to the respective regions or autonomous regions. The planning also considered factors such as grassland type, elevation, basins, mountains, plains, and other landforms, as well as the distribution of grasslands and townships.
The area of each investigation site was at least 0.5 ha, and the distance between adjacent investigation sites was no less than 1 km. In general, for local grasslands with an area of less than 200,000 ha, the area designated for trekking must be at least 3% of the total grassland area. For grasslands ranging from 200,000 ha to 540,000 ha, the trekking area must comprise at least 2.5% of the total area. For grasslands exceeding 540,000 ha, the trekking area must account for at least 2% of the total area.
In this study, a total of 157 routes and 992 investigation sites were established. Multiple routes were implemented within each division of the Corps, and typical Acridoidea occurrence zones were selected as investigation sites. These investigation sites were reassessed over a three-year period.

2.1.3. Description of Study Site

This study investigated grasslands within the jurisdiction of 13 divisions of the Xinjiang Corps, including Alar city, the 1st division, which is located in the Aksu region on Xinjiang’s southern border; Tiemenguan city, the 2nd division, which is located in the Bayinguoleng Mongol Autonomous Prefecture on the southern border; Tumushuke city, the 3rd division, which is located in the Kashgar region on the southern border; Kokdara city, the 4th division, which is located in the Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture on the northern border; Shuanghe city, the 5th division, which is located in the Bortala Mongol Autonomous Prefecture on the northern border; Wujiaqu city, the 6th division, which is located north of Urumqi in the Changji Hui Autonomous Region in northern Xinjiang; Huyanghe city, the 7th division, which is located in Karamay and the Tacheng area of the Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture in northern Xinjiang; Shihezi city, the 8th division; Xiaobaiyang city, the 9th division, which is located in the Tacheng area of the Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture in northern Xinjiang; Beitun city, the 10th division, which is located in the Altay region of the Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture in northern Xinjiang; the 12th division, which is located in the vicinity of Urumqi in the Changji Hui Autonomous Region in northern Xinjiang; Hongxing city, the 13th division, which is located in the Hami region of eastern Xinjiang; and Kunyu city, the 14th division, which is located in the Hotan region of southern Xinjiang (Figure 1).
This study investigated the grasslands within the jurisdiction of the 13 divisions of the Xinjiang Corps, covering an area of approximately 29,058,000 km2, which constitutes only 5% of the total grassland area of Xinjiang (572,588,000 km2). The distribution of the divisional farms and grassland profiles in the surveyed area is presented in Table 1.

2.2. Collection Methods

This study followed the “National Grassland Pest Census Implementation Program” and employed the standard plot sampling method for investigation. Five plots were selected within each investigation site, with each plot covering an area of approximately 25 m2. Acridoidea specimens were collected using a trap net in the upper vegetation layer, with the hand-held net (30 × 30 cm) swept once to the left and once to the right per pass. A total of 10 sweeps were performed per plot, resulting in 50 sweeps per standard investigation site.
Each investigation site was georeferenced using a mobile GPS device or other software, which recorded the latitude, longitude, elevation, habitat characteristics, and the identity of the collector.
The specimens collected from each plot were placed in 20 × 30 cm self-sealing bags containing 75% ethanol, with approximately 20 Acridoidea specimens (adults) per bag. Each bag was labeled with a collection tag, which included the specimen label number, collection location, date of collection, collector’s name, and other relevant information. The specimens were then transported to the laboratory for the identification of species, enumeration of Acridoidea, and recording of other pertinent data.

2.3. Specimen Preparation and Identification

Pin insertion method: Based on the size of the Acridoidea body, the appropriate type of insect pin was selected. The specimens were collected and soaked in 75% ethanol during field collection, and once the bodies had softened after drying, a pin was inserted in each specimen. The specimens were then preserved for future analysis, communication, and identification.
Dipping method: The Acridoidea specimens collected from the field and soaked in 75% ethanol were classified and identified according to their species using the line sample method. Specimens of the same species were then placed in the same 50 mL centrifuge tube, with approximately 20 heads per tube. The tubes were filled with 75% ethanol and stored for long-term preservation and subsequent statistical analysis.
The specimens collected from the field and brought to the laboratory were examined for morphological characteristics under a stereomicroscope. Classification and identification were performed with reference to authoritative works, including the Taxonomy of Locusts [17], Zoologia of China: Insecta [18], Chinese Locust Research [19], Identification of Locusts in Xinjiang [20], and other relevant texts. In classification studies of Chinese Acridoidea, scientists classified them into eight families: Oedipodidae [21], Arcypteridae [22], Gomphoceridae [23,24], Acrididae [25], Catantopidae [26], Pamphagidae [27], Chrotogonidae [28], and Pyrgomorphidae [29]. Specimens that were difficult to identify were sent to experts for help.

2.4. Data Processing

In this study, the classification of dominant Acridoidea species was based on the criteria established by Hu Jing et al. Specifically, a species is considered dominant when the number of individuals accounts for more than 10% of the total Acridoidea population. Species with a percentage between 1% and 10% are classified as common, while those with a percentage less than 1% are classified as rare [30].
The species dominance and evenness indices and the similarity coefficient of the collected locusts were analyzed using Shannon–Wiener index [31], Pielou index [32], and Jaccard similarity coefficient, respectively, following the methodology outlined in the Principles and Methods of Biodiversity Research [33]. The formulae for these two indices are as follows:
Shannon Wiener   Index :   H = i = 1 s p i ln p i
Pielou Index: E = H/Hmax, Hmax = lnS
where H—diversity index, S—total number of species, pi—proportion of the individuals of the ith species in relation to total number of individuals in the specimen. The data were analyzed and processed using Excel version 2021and SPSS version 27.01.1.
The similarity between two grassland types was assessed using the Jaccard similarity coefficient [34]. The degree of similarity was categorized as follows: extremely dissimilar when the coefficient was less than 0.25, moderately dissimilar when it ranged from 0.25 to 0.50, moderately similar when it ranged from 0.50 to 0.75, and extremely similar when it exceeded 0.75. The formula for the index is as follows:
Jaccard similarity coefficient: Cj = j/[(a + b) − j]
where a—number of Acridoidea species in grassland type A, b—number of Acridoidea species in grassland type B, j—number of Acridoidea species shared between grassland types A and B.
The environmental data for this study were sourced from WorldClim (https://www.worldclim.org/current/, accessed on 23 August 2024), and climatic data for each region of Xinjiang were extracted over a 30-year period using ArcGIS 10.8 [35]. The dataset included 19 biometeorological factors, with a spatial resolution of 2.5 arc-min. Pearson correlation analysis was performed, and correlation heat maps were generated by combining the climatic data for the 19 factors across the 13 divisions of the Corps in Xinjiang.
Soil-related data for this study were obtained from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD), publicly available through the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/harmonized-world-soil-database-v12/en/, accessed on 20 August 2024). ArcGIS 10.8 was used to extract soil data for Xinjiang, including sand content, silt content, clay content, and organic carbon content.
In this study, we employed the method of the EPIC (Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator) model to calculate the soil erodibility factor (K) [36]. The classification of soil erodibility based on K values is as follows: slight erodibility when K ≤ 0.020, low erodibility when 0.020 < K ≤ 0.026, medium-low erodibility when 0.026 < K ≤ 0.033, medium erodibility when 0.033 < K ≤ 0.040, medium-high erodibility when 0.040 < K ≤ 0.046, and high erodibility when K > 0.046. A higher K value indicates an increased risk of soil erosion in the area.
K E P I C = 0.2 + 0.3 exp [ 0.0256 S A N * ( 1 S I L / 100 ) ] * ( S I L C L A + S I L ) 0.3 * [ 1 0.25 C C + exp ( 3.72 2.95 C ) ] * [ 1 0.7 ( 1 S A N / 100 ) ( 1 S A N / 100 ) + exp ( 5.51 + 22.9 ( 1 S A N / 100 ) ) ]
K = ( 0.01383 + 0.51575 K E P I C ) * 0.1317
Here, SAN—sand content (0.05–2.00 mm) (%); SIL—silt content (0.002–0.05 mm) (%); CLA—clay content (<0.002 mm) (%); C—organic carbon content (%). The resulting KEPIC values were subsequently converted to the international system of K values, expressed in units of t·ha·h/(MJ·mm·ha).
ArcGIS 10.8 was used to calculate the K values of soil erodibility in Xinjiang. Spatial distribution maps of the dominant grassland Acridoidea species using ArcGIS 10.8, based on the soil erodibility K values, were generated by combining data on the dominant Acridoidea species in each division of the Xinjiang Corps.

3. Results

3.1. Survey of Grassland Acridoidea Species in Each Division

In this study, a total of 5290 Acridoidea specimens were collected between June 2022 and August 2024. A total of 83 species from eight families and 37 genera were identified. These included 1 species in 1 genus of Pyrgomorphidae, 2 species in 2 genera of Pamphagidae, 1 species in 1 genus of Chrotogonidae, 6 species in 3 genera of Catantopidae, 29 species in 12 genera of Oedipodidae, 36 species in 11 genera of Arcypteridae, 5 species in 4 genera of Gomphoceridae, and 3 genera containing 3 species of Acrididae (species names are listed in Supplementary Materials). The dominant species in each division are as follows in Table 2.

3.2. Comparison of Grassland Acridoidea Species Diversity

As shown in Table 3, the Shannon–Wiener and Pielou indices of grassland Acridoidea varied across the divisions of the Corps. The Shannon–Wiener diversity index was highest in the 5th and 4th divisions, followed by the 9th division. The Pielou index was greatest in the 13th division, followed by the 14th and 10th divisions, while the 4th division exhibited the lowest Pielou index. These results indicate that the 5th and 4th divisions had the richest Acridoidea species diversity, whereas the 13th division demonstrated the most uniform distribution of Acridoidea populations across species.

3.3. Distribution of Grassland Acridoidea in Different Grassland Types

Acridoidea from the eight families exhibited varied patterns across grassland types. Among these, Acridoidea of the family Arcypteridae were the most widely distributed, occurring in all eight grassland types, with the highest number of species found in the mountain meadow and temperate grassland types. Oedipodidae species were present in seven grassland types but were absent from the temperate grassland type, with the highest number of species observed in the temperate desert class. Pyrgomorphidae species were restricted to the lowland meadow type, while those of the family Chrotogonidae were found exclusively in the temperate desert type (Table 4).
The total number of Acridoidea genera and species varied across grassland types. The lowland meadow, mountain meadow, temperate steppe, and temperate desert types exhibited higher distributions, with 16 genera and 28 species, 18 genera and 42 species, 22 genera and 43 species, and 16 genera and 38 species, respectively (Table 4).
The temperate desert grassland type supported the highest number of Acridoidea families (6). The second highest number of Acridoidea families (5) was distributed across lowland meadows, alpine meadows, mountain meadows, and temperate steppes. In contrast, three Acridoidea families were found in the temperate desert steppe and temperate steppe desert types. Only one family, Reticulitidae, was present in the temperate meadow grassland type.
The Jaccard similarity coefficient between the temperate desert grassland and temperate steppe desert types was the highest (Figure 2). This indicates that these two grassland types shared a high number of identical Acridoidea species, exhibiting extremely similar distributions. The numbers of Acridoidea families, genera, and species in the temperate desert grassland and temperate steppe desert types were 3, 8, and 17, and 3, 7, and 17, respectively. In contrast, the similarity coefficients of the temperate grassland type with both the mountain meadow and lowland meadow types were 0.51, reflecting moderate similarity in species composition. The numbers of Acridoidea families, genera, and species were 5, 22, and 43, respectively, while the corresponding values were 5, 18, and 42 for the mountain meadow type and 5, 16, and 28 for the lowland meadow type. The Jaccard similarity coefficients of the temperate desert, temperate desert grassland, and temperate steppe desert types with the temperate meadow grassland type were all 0, and their similarity coefficients with the alpine meadow type were 0.03. This indicates that these grassland types share virtually no overlapping Acridoidea species distributions.

3.4. Relationship Between Grassland Acridoidea Species Diversity and Grassland Types

Table 5 presents the Shannon–Wiener and Pielou indices for Acridoidea across different grassland types. The temperate desert type recorded the highest number of Acridoidea specimens (1527), followed by the temperate grassland (1357) and mountain meadow (1257) types. Acridoidea were less abundant in the alpine meadow (86) and temperate meadow grassland (53) types. The Shannon–Wiener index was highest in the temperate grassland type (3.053), relatively low in the temperate desert grassland (1.887) and temperate steppe desert (1.703) types, and intermediate in the other grassland types. Among the eight grassland types, the alpine meadow and temperate grassland types exhibited the highest Pielou indices with values of 0.837 and 0.812, respectively. These findings suggest that grassland Acridoidea species are more diverse and evenly distributed in temperate grassland and mountain meadow types.

3.5. The Relationship Between Dominant Grassland Acridoidea Species and Soil Erodibility (K) Values

The K values of soil erodibility in Xinjiang were calculated to range from 0.020 to 0.088 based on the sand, silt, clay, and organic carbon content from regional soil data. The highest K values were observed in the Junggar Basin and Tarim Basin regions, classifying these areas as high-erodibility zones. Similarly, the eastern region of Xinjiang, parts of Altay, the areas between southern Tian Shan and the Tarim Basin, and the northern Kunlun Mountains exhibited higher K values, also falling within high-erodibility zones. In contrast, parts of the Yili Valley, Tacheng, and areas surrounding Wujiaqu, Shihezi, Karamay, and Huyanghe showed the lowest K values, indicating low-to-medium-low erodibility. The remaining regions, with K values ranging from approximately 0.035 to 0.088, were categorized as medium-to-high-erodibility zones.
As illustrated in Figure 3, the majority of dominant Acridoidea species in each division of the Corps are primarily distributed in areas classified as low-erodibility or medium-low-erodibility. In contrast, their presence in regions with medium--to-high erodibility intervals is minimal or nonexistent.

3.6. The Relationship Between Grassland Acridoidea Species Diversity and Altitude

The Shannon–Wiener and Pielou indices for Acridoidea species in different altitude zones are shown in Table 6.
Table 6 indicates that the Shannon–Wiener index of Acridoidea species was highest in the altitude range of 1000–1500 m, with a value of 3.237. This was followed by the 500–1000 m and 1500–2000 m intervals, which had diversity indices of 2.976 and 2.867, respectively. These results suggest that the species diversity index of grassland Acridoidea increases with altitudes up to 1500 m, but declines at higher elevations.
The Pielou index of Acridoidea species was higher in the interval of 3000–3500 m at 0.837, compared to other altitude intervals, and it was lowest in the interval of 500–1500 m at 0.735.
The 1000–1500 m altitude range contained the highest number of grassland Acridoidea specimens, totaling 1831. This was followed by the 500–1000 m and 1500–2000 m altitude ranges, which recorded 1368 and 917 specimens, respectively. In contrast, the fewest Acridoidea specimens were observed in the 3000–3500 m altitude range, with only 86 individuals.
In terms of Acridoidea families, Catantopidae, Oedipodidae, Arcypteridae, and Gomphoceridae exhibited broader vertical distribution, occurring across the 0–3500 m altitude range. These families were predominantly concentrated within the 500–1500 m altitude interval. The family Pyrgomorphidae, however, was restricted to lower altitudes, whereas Arcypteridae represented the family with the highest species distribution at higher altitudes.
As shown in the proportions of species distribution across the eight families of Acridoidea at various altitudes (Figure 4), the number of Acridoidea species reached its peak at an altitude of 500–1500 m in most families. The vertical distributions of the Pamphagidae, Pyrgomorphidae, and Chrotogonidae families were notably narrower compared to the other families.

3.7. The Relationships of Acridoidea Species Diversity with Temperature and Rainfall

As shown in Figure 5, the diversity indices of grassland Acridoidea species in each division of the Corps exhibited a significant positive correlation (p > 0.05) with the average temperature of the wettest quarter (Bio-8), the average temperature of the warmest quarter (Bio-10), the precipitation level in the wettest month (Bio-13), and the precipitation level in the driest quarter (Bio-17). Furthermore, they showed a weak positive correlation (p < 0.05) with isothermality (Bio-3), the precipitation level during the wettest season (Bio-16), the precipitation level in the hottest quarter (Bio-18), and the precipitation level in the coldest quarter (Bio-19). A significant negative correlation was observed with the minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio-6) and annual precipitation (Bio-12).
The Pielou index of grassland Acridoidea species in all divisions of the Corps was significantly and positively correlated with the annual average temperature (Bio-1). It was significantly negatively correlated with precipitation in the driest month (Bio-14), and weakly negatively correlated with the average temperature of the driest quarter (Bio-9), the average temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio-11), and precipitation seasonality (Bio-15).
The numbers of families, genera, and species of grassland Acridoidea in all divisions of the Corps were significantly positively correlated with the average temperature of the wettest season (Bio-8), the average temperature of the warmest season (Bio-10), and the precipitation level of the wettest month (Bio-13), and significantly negatively correlated with annual precipitation (Bio-12). They were also significantly positively correlated with the Shannon–Wiener index and significantly negatively correlated with the Pielou index. The specimen number of grassland Acridoidea in each division of the Corps was significantly positively correlated with the average temperature of the hottest quarter (Bio-10), the average temperature of the wettest quarter (Bio-8), and seasonal precipitation (Bio-15), and had no significant correlation with other ecological factors.

4. Discussion

4.1. Comparison of Acridoidea Species Diversity Across Corps Divisions

The comparison of grassland Acridoidea diversity indices, along with species number and evenness, revealed that the distribution density of Acridoidea individuals, as well as the distribution area and range of species, is strongly influenced by geographical conditions and the natural environment.
In comparison, the 4th, 5th, and 9th divisions exhibited a higher grassland Acridoidea diversity index and richer species than other divisions of the Corps. The 9th division is located in the Junggar Basin, with a lower average elevation, and has all eight grassland types investigated in this study, while the 5th and 4th divisions have seven grassland types, with habitats that provide favorable environments for more Acridoidea species to survive.
The grassland Acridoidea diversity indices of the 5th and 4th divisions were both high, at 2.979 and 2.883, respectively. However, the evenness indices differed, with the Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture exhibiting the lowest evenness index (0.704) among the regions of Xinjiang. This indicates a highly uneven distribution of Acridoidea individuals across species, primarily due to the dominance of Dociostaurus (Kazakia) brevicollis in the specimen population. This dominance can be attributed to the significant proportion of specimens from Dociostaurus (Kazakia) brevicollis in these divisions. This further suggests that the dominant Acridoidea species are better adapted to each region’s ecological environment and exhibit higher competitive ability within the community.
The Acridoidea assemblages from all regions of the Xinjiang Corps exhibited high evenness (0.944 and 0.925) in the 13th and 14th divisions, indicating a more balanced distribution of individuals across all Acridoidea species in these divisions.
Considering the geographical and ecological characteristics of Xinjiang, it is evident that the natural environment in the northern foothills of the Tianshan Mountains (northern Xinjiang) is considerably more favorable than that in the southern region. The climate and soil conditions in the north are conducive to vegetation growth, with extensive areas cultivated for crops, thus creating a more suitable habitat for Acridoidea. Consequently, the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 12th divisions, as well as the 7th, 9th, and 10th divisions in northern Xinjiang, exhibited higher levels of overall species diversity compared to the southern divisions. This finding aligns with the report by Zhao Ling et al. [9], which indicates that Acridoidea species are more diverse and widely distributed in northern Xinjiang, particularly in Altay, Tacheng, Bortala, Yili, and Changji, than in the southern regions.
In this study, a total of 83 species of locust (belong to eight families and 37 genera) were identified, which constitutes less than 50% of the 65 genera and 171 species reported by Zhao L. [9]. This discrepancy may be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the development of pastoralism has led to increased efforts in controlling and preventing grassland locusts, potentially resulting in a reduction in Acridoidea species. Secondly, this study was limited to a locust survey within the grasslands in the Corps, covering an area of approximately 29,058,000 km2. This area represents only a small fraction of the total grassland area in Xinjiang, which spans 572,588,000 km2 [37]; thus, this contributed to the relatively small number of locust species observed. Thirdly, the soils in Xinjiang are primarily wind-sand and saline soils, which are increasingly vulnerable to erosion due to persistent wind and sand erosion, as well as other forms of degradation [38]. In an ecological environment characterized by deteriorating soil conditions and escalating soil erosion, the diversity of grassland Acridoidea species is likely to diminish, further explaining the lower number of Acridoidea species identified in this study compared to previous investigations.

4.2. Comparison of the Distribution and Diversity of Acridoidea in Different Grassland Types

Mountain meadow grasslands, temperate grasslands, and temperate desert grasslands contained more Acridoidea species than did other grassland types, with 42, 43, and 38 species, respectively. The number of Acridoidea specimens in these grassland types was also higher compared to other grassland types. The diversity indices of Acridoidea in temperate grasslands and mountain meadows were relatively high (3.053 and 2.563, respectively), with these two grassland types exhibiting both a higher number of Acridoidea species and a greater number of specimens. Beyond the availability of green vegetation, plant nutrients play a significant role in regulating grasshopper population dynamics [39]. This suggests that Acridoidea are more likely to thrive in grassland ecosystems characterized by abundant vegetation, ample food sources, and moderate temperature and humidity.
Different families, genera, and species of Acridoidea exhibit distinct preferences for specific grassland types and ecological environments. Acridoidea species of the family Arcypteridae are primarily concentrated in mountain meadows and temperate grasslands. This preference is attributed to their phytophilous nature [40], as these grassland types feature abundant plant species and suitable temperature and humidity conditions, creating an ideal environment for their survival and reproduction. In contrast, Acridoidea species of the family Oedipodidae are more commonly found in temperate deserts, temperate desert grasslands, and temperate steppe desert grasslands. These habitats, characterized by exposed rocky surfaces and sparse vegetation, provide optimal conditions for ground-dwelling and rock-dwelling Acridoidea of the Locustidae family to thrive [40].
The similarity of Acridoidea species across different grassland types reveals some notable differences in species composition, which may be attributed to factors such as anthropogenic grazing disturbances [41] and variations in the vertical distribution of plant species diversity. Additionally, the influence of hydrothermal resources on Acridoidea behaviors, including oviposition, hatching, molting, and reproduction, may contribute to variations in Acridoidea species composition, onset periods, and population characteristics [42]. Furthermore, abiotic environmental factors, such as food availability and quality, environmental coercion, and environmental changes, also play a significant role in shaping Acridoidea populations [43,44]. Acridoidea adapt to changes in the grassland microenvironment to enhance their capacity to cope with environmental fluctuations, leading to the development of distinct dominance mechanisms [45]. Overall, the heterogeneity of hydrothermal resources and vegetation characteristics across different grassland types significantly impacts the growth, habitat, feeding, and distribution patterns of Acridoidea. This, in turn, influences the spatial patterns of Acridoidea species composition, distribution, and diversity within various grassland ecosystems.

4.3. Species Diversity of Acridoidea at Different Altitudes

Soil factors play an important role in Orthoptera diversity [46]. Soil interventions have been shown to reduce locust damage [47]. This is consistent with the conclusion we reached: the dominant Acridoidea species are primarily found in areas with low-to-medium-low soil erodibility. These areas, which extend from parts of the Ili River Valley to parts of Tacheng, also exhibit higher grassland Acridoidea species diversity indices, particularly in the 9th, 5th, and 4th divisions. Several factors contribute to the higher Acridoidea species diversity index in these regions: favorable soil conditions, higher land use rates, increased vegetation cover, and stronger human intervention and planning. These factors promote the development of more stable ecosystems, enhance biodiversity, and provide a suitable ecological environment for the occurrence of grassland Acridoidea.
The vertical distribution of grassland Acridoidea shows that both the number of species and the species diversity index increase with altitudes in the range of 0–1500 m. However, as altitude rises from 1500 m to 3500 m, both the number of species and the species diversity index decrease, with the highest values observed between 1000 and 1500 m. This finding aligns with previous research, which concludes that biodiversity does not uniformly increase with altitude but peaks at intermediate elevations. Similar trends in biodiversity changes with altitude have been reported by Kessler [48,49,50]. Several factors may explain this pattern: First, grasslands at around 1500 m exhibit moderate temperatures and a variety of grassland types, including all meadow types except for alpine and lowland meadows. These areas also have expansive grasslands with healthy vegetation and relatively low levels of anthropogenic interference, providing a stable ecosystem for Acridoidea. Second, the greater variety of vegetation types at this altitude offers Acridoidea a favorable environment with abundant food resources, which support their growth, development, and reproduction [51].
The results of the present study are consistent with those reported by Qiao [52]. This study found that the Arcypteridae family is the dominant Acridoidea group at higher elevations. Similarly, Qiao concluded that Acridoidea from the genera Chorthippus sp., Stenobothrus sp., and Omocestus sp., all of which belong to the Arcypteridae family, are more commonly distributed in grasslands at higher elevations.

4.4. Effects of Temperature and Rainfall on Species Diversity of Acridoidea

According to the water–energy dynamic hypothesis [53], temperature and precipitation are important environmental factors for maintaining insect species richness [54]. Species in the order Orthoptera, as thermophiles, are extremely sensitive to climate change, and small fluctuations in temperature and precipitation can cause drastic changes in the distribution patterns of their taxa [55]. This study analyzed the correlations between Acridoidea species diversity and climatic factors and revealed significant positive correlations between species diversity and various climatic variables, including the average temperature of the wettest quarter (Bio-8), the average temperature of the warmest quarter (Bio-10), precipitation in the wettest month (Bio-13), and precipitation in the driest quarter (Bio-17). Higher ambient temperatures have been reported to favor the growth and development of Orthoptera, and they remain mostly categorized as driven by precipitation patterns [56], which aligns with the results of the present study [57].
These findings provide a stronger explanation for the conclusions drawn in the previous section, highlighting that the 4th, 5th, and 9th divisions exhibited higher levels of species diversity. The grasslands of the 4th division, located in the Ili River Valley, benefit from abundant perennial pastures and sufficient rainfall. The 5th and 9th divisions, situated to the north of the Tianshan Mountains, have relatively lower elevations and more favorable temperatures compared to the rest of Xinjiang. Warmer climates will likely allow grasshoppers to achieve body temperatures closer to optimal over a greater part of the day, allowing them to eat, digest, and grow faster [50]. The ecological conditions in these divisions support higher biodiversity, and the correlation analysis further substantiated the validity of these findings.
The spatial distribution pattern of species diversity has become a hot topic in recent research in ecology, biogeography, and conservation biology [58,59,60]. Future studies should aim to address gaps in the understanding of the relationship between grassland Acridoidea species diversity and habitats. Specifically, research should explore the effects of many factors, including abiotic factors (temperature, precipitation), food availability and quality, habitat availability and structure, symbionts, competitors, predators, pathogens, and interactions among these factors [61]. Furthermore, a more detailed clarification of the relationship between grassland Acridoidea species diversity and habitats is needed.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we first analyzed the species diversity of grassland Acridoidea across various divisions (regions) of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, comparing the diversity indices of Acridoidea species in different divisions. Second, we conducted a comprehensive investigation into the effects of ecological factors on the species diversity and distribution of grassland Acridoidea, including the grassland type, altitude, temperature, and soil erodibility. Our findings revealed significant differences in Acridoidea community composition and diversity across different ecological environments within the Xinjiang Corps. These differences can be attributed to several factors, including anthropogenic grazing disturbances, variations in the vertical distribution of plant species, and the influence of water and heat resources on Acridoidea behaviors such as egg laying, hatching, and reproduction. Additionally, abiotic environmental factors, including environmental gradients, stresses, and changes, play a role in shaping the Acridoidea distribution. Ultimately, the distribution of Acridoidea in the grasslands managed by the Corps is regional, flexible, and diverse. In conclusion, the heterogeneity of regional ecological environments, shaped by the interplay of grassland type, altitude, soil characteristics, temperature, and humidity, significantly influences the growth, habitat, feeding, and distribution patterns of grassland Acridoidea, leading to a varied distribution of Acridoidea species across different habitats.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology14010014/s1, File S1: Composition of grasshoppers in grasslands of 1–14 divisions in Xinjiang (Number of Specimens); File S2: Grassland investigation sites information.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W.; Data curation, Y.L.; Formal analysis, Y.L.; Funding acquisition, S.W.; Investigation, Y.L., Y.H., G.Y., X.P., and C.Z.; Methodology, S.W.; Project administration, S.W.; Resources, S.W.; Software, S.W.; Supervision, S.W.; Validation, Y.L.; Visualization, Y.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; Writing—review and editing, S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The Survey of Harmful Organisms in the Grasslands of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps: XJFS-ZFCG-002-02.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xiong, L. Application of locust integrated control technology based on biological control in Xinjiang grassland. Livest. Husb. Xinjiang 2011, 3, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, M.F.; Ma, Y.C.; Liu, Y.H.; Sheng, J.D.; Chen, J.H. Pattern and drivers of phylogenetic diversity in Xinjiang grassland. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 2285–2299. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, D.L.; Feng, Z.D. Holocene climate variations in the Altai Mountains and the surrounding areas:A synthesis of pollen records. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2018, 185, 847–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Wei, C.; Tang, J. Understanding the complexity of temperature dynamics in Xinjiang, China, from multitemporal scale and spatial perspectives. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 259248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, J.T.; Fan, Y.M.; Wu, H.Q.; Cheng, J.H.; Sheng, J.D.; Yang, R.; Yuan, B.B. Analysis of Soil Diversity Characteristics and Main Influencing Factors in Different Geomorphologic Regions of Northern Xinjiang. Chin. J. Soil Sci. 2023, 54, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mendonça, R.; Müller, R.A.; Clow, D.; Verpoorter, C.; Raymond, P.; Tranvik, L.J.; Sobek, S. Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Unsicker, S.B.; Franzke, A.; Specht, J.; Köhler, G.; Linz, J.; Renker, C.; Stein, C.; Weisser, W.W. Plant species richness in montane grasslands affects the fitness of a generalist Acridoidea species. Ecology 2010, 91, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bugaev, G.S. Habitat distribution of Acridoidea in the zone of band pine forests in North-East Kazakhstan. Vestn. Selskokhoziastvennoj Nauk. Kazakhstana 1977, 6, 37–40. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao, L.; Wang, D.Y.; Zhao, L.; Xiao, W.H. Research progress of Acridoidea in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric. Sci. 2012, 49, 1212–1223. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, J.X.; Jin, X.; Guan, T.X.; Li, R.C.; Zhou, D.L.; Dorhong, B.; Bu, R.D.; Zhang, X.Y.; Ren, J.L.; Zhao, L. Diversity and Community Structure Characteristics of Grassland Locusts in Bortala Mongol Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2022, 38, 1213–1222. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tiede, Y.; Hemp, C.; Schmidt, A.; Nauss, T.; Farwig, N.; Brandl, R. Beyond body size: Consistent decrease of traits within orthopteran assemblages with elevation. Ecology 2018, 99, 2090–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wiesner, K.R.; Habel, J.C.; Gossner, M.M.; Loxdale, H.D.; Köhler, G.; Schneider, A.R.; Tiedemann, R.; Weisser, W.W. Effects of habitat structure and land-use intensity on the genetic structure of the Acridoidea species Chorthippus parallelus. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2014, 1, 140133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cherrill, A. Large-scale spatial patterns in species richness of Orthoptera in the Greater London Area, United Kingdom: Relationships with land cover. Landsc. Res. 2015, 40, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jakab, D.A.; Nagy, A. How can an intensively used agricultural landscape preserve diversity of Orthoptera assemblages? J. Insect Conserv. 2022, 26, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, C.; Fischer, G.; Hita Garcia, F.; Yamane, S.; Liu, Q.; Peng, Y.Q.; Economo, E.P.; Guénard, B.; Pierce, N.E. Ants of the Hengduan Mountains: A new altitudinal survey and updated checklist for Yunnan Province highlight an understudied insect biodiversity hotspot. ZooKeys 2020, 978, 1–171. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sergeev, M.G. Distribution Patterns of Acridoidea and Their Kin over the Eurasian Steppes. Insects 2021, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zheng, Z.M. Taxonomy of Locusts; Shaanxi Normal University Press: Xi’an, China, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zheng, Z.M. Zoology of China: Insecta, Institute of Zoology; Chinese Academy of Sciences: Beijing, China, 2000. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, Y.L. Chinese Locust Research; Hubei Science and Technology Press: Wuhan, China, 2019. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, J.G.; Zhao, L.; Lei, Y.H. Identification of Locusts in Xinjiang; Corps Press: Urumqi, China, 2014. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, M.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, N.; Nong, X.; Tu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhuang, L.; Cha, G.; et al. Molecular identification and related functional characterization of the FKBP52 gene in immunity of Locusta migratoria manilensis (Orthoptera: Oedipodidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2024, 117, 1130–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, M.; Li, H.; Bukero, A.A.; Shu, J.P.; Zhuo, F.Y.; Liu, L.Y.; Zhang, A.H. An Evaluation of the Crop Preference and Phenotypic Characteristics of Ceracris kiangsu Tsai (Orthoptera: Arcypteridae) under Different Temperatures. Biology 2023, 12, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Xue, X.; Qin, G.; Gao, Y.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.J. Comparative analysis of mitogenomes among three species of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Gomphocerinae) and their phylogenetic implications. PeerJ 2023, 11, e16550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qian, H.; Altanchimeg, D.; Naizab, N.; Wang, S.; Wen, S.; Lin, C. The complete mitochondrial genome of Eclipophleps carinata (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Gomphoceridae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2021, 6, 1310–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nakano, M.; Morgan-Richards, M.; Trewick, S.A.; Clavijo-McCormick, A. Chemical Ecology and Olfaction in Short-Horned Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J. Chem. Ecol. 2022, 48, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ye, B.H.; Shen, W.X.; Jia, C.Y.; Yin, Z. A new species and key to known species of the genus Conophymacris Willemse, 1933 (Orthoptera, Acridoidea, Catantopidae, Podisminae) from China. Zootaxa 2021, 5047, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zheng, F.Y.; Shi, Q.Y.; Ling, Y.; Chen, J.Y.; Zhang, B.F.; Li, X.J. Comparative Analysis of Mitogenomes among Five Species of Filchnerella (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Pamphagidae) and Their Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Implications. Insects 2021, 12, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhi, Y.; Dong, L.; Yin, H.; Zhang, D. The complete mitochondrial genome of Mekongiella kingdoni (Uvarov, 1937) (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Chrotogonidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 2016, 27, 187–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nankivell, R.N. Karyotype differences in the crenaticeps-group of Atractomorpha (Orthoptera, Acridoidea, Pyrgomorphidae). Chromosoma 1976, 56, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, J.; Qian, X.J.; Liu, C.Z. Responses of the Acridoidea community biodiversity and pattern intensity to the plant community. J. Plant Prot. 2021, 48, 202–211. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jawuoro, S.; Koech, O.; Karuku, G.; Mbau, J. Plant species composition and diversity depending on piospheres and seasonality in the southern rangelands of Kenya. Ecol. Process 2017, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Foldi, J.; Blenman, K.R.M.; Marczyk, M.; Gunasekharan, V.; Polanska, A.; Gee, R.; Davis, M.; Kahn, A.M.; Silber, A.; Pusztai, L. Peripheral blood immune parameters, response, and adverse events after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2024, 208, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Biodiversity Committee; Chinese Academy of Sciences. Principles and Methods of Biodiversity Research; China Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ding, J.Y.; Zhao, W.W.; Daryanto, S.; Wang, L.X.; Fan, H.; Feng, Q.; Wang, Y.P. The spatial distribution and temporal variation of desert riparian forests and their influencing factors in the downstream Heihe River Basin, China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 21, 2405–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Miao, Q.; Yuan, Y.J.; Luo, G.M.; Wei, C.H.; Rao, Y.Q.; Gong, Y.H.; Zhang, L.; Shao, J.; Dong, Y.K. Study on ecological suitability of Gardenia jasminoides based on ArcGIS and Maxent model. Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi 2016, 41, 3181–3185. [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams, J.R.; Renard, K.G.; Dyke, P.T. EPIC: A new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1983, 38, 381–383. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yan, D.J.; Zhou, Q.W.; Lu, H.; Wu, C.C.; Zhao, B.Y.; Cao, D.D.; Ma, F.; Liu, X.X. The Disaster, Ecological Distribution and Control of Poisonous Weeds in Natural Grasslands of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2015, 48, 565–582. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhong, J.L.; Guo, Z.X. Methods of Calculating and Mapping Soil Erodibility K in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Environ. Prot. 2014, 36, 1–4+10. [Google Scholar]
  39. Welti, E.A.R.; Roeder, K.A.; de Beurs, K.M.; Joern, A.; Kaspari, M. Nutrient dilution and climate cycles underlie declines in a dominant insect herbivore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 7271–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chen, Y.L. Studies on the acridoids of xinjiang uighur autonomous region: Distribution of acridoids. Acta Entomol. Sin. 1981, 24, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  41. Cease, A.J.; Elser, J.J.; Ford, C.F.; Hao, S.; Kang, L.; Harrison, J.F. Heavy livestock grazing promotes locust outbreaks by lowering plant nitrogen content. Science 2012, 335, 467–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Veran, S.; Simpson, S.J.; Sword, G.A.; Deveson, E.; Piry, S.; Hines, J.E.; Berthier, K. Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics of outbreaking species: Influence of environment and migration in a locust. Ecology 2015, 96, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guo, X.; Yu, Q.; Chen, D.; Wei, J.; Yang, P.; Yu, J.; Wang, X.; Kang, L. 4-Vinylanisole is an aggregation pheromone in locusts. Nature 2020, 584, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gaston, K.J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 2000, 405, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guo, X.J.; Kang, L. Phenotypic Plasticity in Locusts: Trade-Off Between Migration and Reproduction. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2024; In Press. [Google Scholar]
  46. Joern, A. Context-dependent foraging and enemy-free space: Acridoidea sparrows (Ammodramus savannarum) searching for Acridoidea (Acrididae). Écoscience 2016, 9, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Word, M.L.; Hall, S.J.; Robinson, B.E.; Manneh, B.; Beye, A.; Cease, A.J. Soil-targeted interventions could alleviate locust and grasshopper pest pressure in West Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 663, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kessler, M.; Herzog, S.K.; Fjeldså, J. Species richness and endemism of plant and bird communities along two gradients of elevation, humidity and land use in the Bolivian Andes. Divers. Distrib. 2001, 7, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, L.B.; Feng, D.; Yang, J.Y.; Xie, C.H.; Zhou, Z.H.; Cao, D.H.; Chen, P. Flight Path and Habitat Distribution of Immigration Typeyellow Spined Bamboo Locusts (Ceracris kiangsu Tsai) in Yunnan, China. J. West China For. Sci. 2023, 52, 103–109+127. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rahbek, C. The role of spatial scale and the perception of large scale species-richness patterns. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wan Zaki, W.M.; Yahya, M.S.; Norhisham, A.R.; Sanusi, R.; van der Meer, P.J.; Azhar, B. Agroforestry orchards support greater butterfly diversity than monoculture plantations in the tropics. Oecologia 2023, 201, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qiao, Y.M.; Lian, Z.M.; Hu, Y.Q. Vertical distribution of Acridoidea in Balikun of Xinjang. J. Shaanxi Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2001, 29, 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  53. Liang, J.; Ding, Z.; Lie, G. Species richness patterns of vascular plants and their drivers along an elevational gradient in the central Himalayas. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 24, e01279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. de Souza Amorim, D.; Brown, B.V.; Boscolo, D.; Ale-Rocha, R.; Alvarez-Garcia, D.M.; Balbi, M.I.P.A.; de Marco Barbosa, A.; Capellari, R.S.; de Carvalho, C.J.B.; Couri, M.S.; et al. Vertical stratification of insect abundance and species richness in an Amazonian tropical forest. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zergoun, Y.; Guezoul, O.; Sekour, M. Effects of temperatures and rainfall variability on the abundance and diversity of Caelifera (Insecta, Orthoptera) in three natural environments in the Mzab Valley, Septentrional Sahara (Algeria). Tunis. J. Plant Prot. 2018, 13, 217–228. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cease, A.J. How Nutrients Mediate the Impacts of Global Change on Locust Outbreaks. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2024, 69, 527–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gardiner, T.; Hassall, M. Does microclimate affect Acridoidea populations after cutting of hay in improved grassland? J. Insect Conserv. 2009, 13, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Youngblood, J.P.; Cease, A.J.; Talal, S.; Copa, F.; Medina, H.E.; Rojas, J.E.; Trumper, E.V. Climate change expected to improve digestive rate and trigger range expansion in outbreaking locusts. Ecol. Monogr. 2022, 93, e1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Mountain biodiversity, species distribution and ecosystem functioning in a changing world. Diversity 2023, 15, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sergeev, M.G. Ecogeographical distribution of Orthoptera. In The Bionomics of Acridoidea, Katydids and Their Kin; Gangwere, S.K., Muralirangan, M.C., Muralirangan, M., Eds.; CAB International: Oxon, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 129–146. [Google Scholar]
  61. Joern, A.; Gaines, S.B. Population dynamics and regulation in grasshoppers. In Biology of Grasshoppers; Chapman, R.F., Joern, A., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 415–482. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The 992 investigation sites in the 13 divisions of the Xinjiang Corps.
Figure 1. The 992 investigation sites in the 13 divisions of the Xinjiang Corps.
Biology 14 00014 g001
Figure 2. The Jaccard similarity coefficients of Acridoidea communities in different grassland types.
Figure 2. The Jaccard similarity coefficients of Acridoidea communities in different grassland types.
Biology 14 00014 g002
Figure 3. Soil erodibility in Xinjiang and the spatial distribution of dominant Acridoidea species in grasslands of various regions.
Figure 3. Soil erodibility in Xinjiang and the spatial distribution of dominant Acridoidea species in grasslands of various regions.
Biology 14 00014 g003
Figure 4. The proportion of species distribution of eight families of Acridoidea at different altitudes.
Figure 4. The proportion of species distribution of eight families of Acridoidea at different altitudes.
Biology 14 00014 g004
Figure 5. Pearson correlation analysis of species diversity of Acridoidea and environmental factors (Bio1–Bio19). H: Shannon–Wiener index; E: Pielou evenness index; Bio-1: annual average temperature/°C; Bio-2: annual average diurnal temperature range/°C; Bio-3: isothermal characteristic [(Bio-2/Bio-7) × 100]; Bio-4: temperature seasonality (standard deviation × 100); Bio-5: maximum temperature of the hottest month/°C; Bio-6: minimum temperature of the coldest month/°C; Bio-7: annual range of temperature (Bio-5 – Bio-6)/°C; Bio-8: average temperature of the wettest quarter/°C; Bio-9: average temperature of the driest quarter/°C; Bio-10: average temperature of the hottest quarter/°C; Bio-11: average temperature of the coldest quarter/°C; Bio-12: annual precipitation/mm; Bio-13: precipitation in the wettest month/mm; Bio-14: precipitation in the driest month/mm; Bio-15: precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation); Bio-16: wettest quarterly precipitation/mm; Bio-17: driest quarterly precipitation/mm; Bio-18: precipitation in the hottest month/mm; Bio-19: precipitation in the coldest month/mm.
Figure 5. Pearson correlation analysis of species diversity of Acridoidea and environmental factors (Bio1–Bio19). H: Shannon–Wiener index; E: Pielou evenness index; Bio-1: annual average temperature/°C; Bio-2: annual average diurnal temperature range/°C; Bio-3: isothermal characteristic [(Bio-2/Bio-7) × 100]; Bio-4: temperature seasonality (standard deviation × 100); Bio-5: maximum temperature of the hottest month/°C; Bio-6: minimum temperature of the coldest month/°C; Bio-7: annual range of temperature (Bio-5 – Bio-6)/°C; Bio-8: average temperature of the wettest quarter/°C; Bio-9: average temperature of the driest quarter/°C; Bio-10: average temperature of the hottest quarter/°C; Bio-11: average temperature of the coldest quarter/°C; Bio-12: annual precipitation/mm; Bio-13: precipitation in the wettest month/mm; Bio-14: precipitation in the driest month/mm; Bio-15: precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation); Bio-16: wettest quarterly precipitation/mm; Bio-17: driest quarterly precipitation/mm; Bio-18: precipitation in the hottest month/mm; Bio-19: precipitation in the coldest month/mm.
Biology 14 00014 g005
Table 1. The grassland type and area of different regions and regiment fields.
Table 1. The grassland type and area of different regions and regiment fields.
Division
Headquarter
AreaGrassland TypeGrassland AreaRegiment Field Distribution
1st divisionAksu prefectureTemperate grasslands,
alpine meadows,
lowland meadows, and
mountain meadows
2.33734th and 5th regiments
2nd divisionBayin’guoleng Mongol autonomous prefecture of XinjiangTemperate grasslands,
alpine meadows, and
lowland meadows
18.421st, 22nd, 24th, 25th, 27th, 29th, 30th, 36th, and 223rd regiments
3rd divisionKashgar or Kāshí prefectureAlpine meadows,
temperate desert grasslands,
temperate meadow grasslands, temperate deserts, and
lowland meadows
11.31Toyun Ranch and Yecheng Second Ranch
4th divisionIli Kazakh autonomous prefectureTemperate grasslands,
temperate meadow grasslands,
mountain meadows,
lowland meadows,
alpine meadows,
temperate deserts, and
temperate desert grasslands
19.1761st, 63rd, 64th, 66th, 67th, 70th, 71st, 72nd, 73rd, 74th, 76th, 77th, 78th, and 79th regiments
5th divisionBörtala Mongol autonomous prefectureTemperate grasslands,
temperate meadow grasslands,
mountain meadows,
lowland meadows,
alpine meadows,
temperate deserts, and
temperate desert grasslands
13.1683rd, 84th, 86th, 87th, 88th, 89th, 90th, and 91st regiments
6th divisionChangji prefectureTemperate grasslands,
temperate deserts,
temperate desert grasslands, and temperate steppe deserts
26.59Beitashan Ranch, Hongqi Ranch, and Qitai Ranch
8th division Temperate grasslands, temperate deserts, mountain meadows,
temperate desert grasslands,
lowland meadows, and
alpine meadows
7.36142nd, 143rd, and 151st regiments
12th division Temperate grasslands, temperate meadow grasslands,
mountain meadows,
temperate desert grasslands,
lowland meadows,
alpine meadows,
temperate deserts, and
temperate steppe deserts
19.92104th regiment
7th divisionTacheng prefectureTemperate grasslands, temperate deserts, mountain meadows,
lowland meadows,
temperate meadow grasslands,
temperate desert grasslands, and alpine meadows
10.44124th, 131st, and 137th regiments
9th division Lowland meadows,
temperate grasslands,
temperate deserts,
temperate desert grasslands, mountain meadows,
temperate meadow grasslands, alpine meadows, and
temperate steppe deserts
13.65161st, 162nd, 163rd, 164th,
165th, 166th, 167th, 168th, and 170th regiments
10th divisionAltay prefectureTemperate meadow grasslands, temperate grasslands,
temperate deserts,
temperate desert grasslands,
mountain meadows,
lowland meadows,
alpine meadows, and
temperate steppe deserts
9.29181st, 182nd, 183rd, 184th,
185th, 186th, 187th, and 188th regiments
13th divisionKumul prefectureTemperate grasslands, temperate desert grasslands,
alpine meadows,
temperate deserts,
lowland meadows, and
temperate steppe deserts
18.59Red Hill Farm, Red Star Farm, Yellowfield Farm, and
Willow Springs Farm
14th divisionKhotan prefectureTemperate grasslands, temperate desert grasslands,
alpine meadows,
temperate deserts,
lowland meadows, and
temperate steppe deserts
7.61I Ranch, 47th regiment
Table 2. The families, genera, species, specimens, and dominant species (genera) of Acridoidea identified in each division.
Table 2. The families, genera, species, specimens, and dominant species (genera) of Acridoidea identified in each division.
DivisionNumber of FamiliesNumber of GeneraNumber of SpeciesNumber of SpecimensDominant Species
1st division2227Chorthippus biguttulus
Gomphocerus sibiricus
2nd division24768Myrmeleotettix palpalis
3rd division23713Omocestus rufipes
4th division627603130Dociostaurus brevicollis
5th division52139616Calliptamus barbarus
Calliptamus italicus
6th division491549Sphingonotus nebulosus
Stauroderus scalaris
7th division41222224Gomphocerus sibiricus
Omocestus haemorrhoidalis
8th division41220772Calliptamus italicus
Omocestus haemorrhoidalis
Notostaurus albicornis
9th division41630235Calliptamus barbarus
Calliptamus italicus
Oedaleus decorus
10th division371155Bryodemella zaisanica ferrugineums
Sphingonotus eurasius
Myrmeleotettix brachypterus
12th division3101282Omocestus haemorrhoidalis
Oedaleus decorus
13th division13719Sphingonotus obscuratus
14th division13620Chorthippus maritimushuabeiensis
Table 3. The Shannon-Wiener diversity (H) and Pielou’s evenness (E) indices of locusts in grassland habitats of Xinjiang.
Table 3. The Shannon-Wiener diversity (H) and Pielou’s evenness (E) indices of locusts in grassland habitats of Xinjiang.
DivisionHE
1st division0.5980.863
2nd division1.4910.766
3rd division1.6920.87
4th division2.8830.704
5th division2.9790.813
6th division2.1690.800
7th division2.3490.759
8th division2.1670.730
9th division2.7950.822
10th division2.170.905
12th division2.0250.815
13th division1.8370.944
14th division1.6570.925
Table 4. Distribution of eight Acridoidea families in different grassland types (number of species).
Table 4. Distribution of eight Acridoidea families in different grassland types (number of species).
Grassland TypesLowland MeadowAlpine MeadowMountain MeadowTemperate GrasslandTemperate Meadow GrasslandTemperate DesertTemperate Desert
Grassland
Temperate Steppe Desert
Arcypteridae1410292814822
Oedipodidae711050241212
Gomphoceridae33150000
Acrididae01120100
Catantopidae33030333
Pamphagidae00100100
Chrotogonidae 00000100
Pyrgomorphidae10000000
Number of genera1610182231687
Number of species2818424314381717
Table 5. The number of species, specimens, and Shannon–Wiener (H) and Pielou (E) indices of Acridoidea in different grassland types.
Table 5. The number of species, specimens, and Shannon–Wiener (H) and Pielou (E) indices of Acridoidea in different grassland types.
Grassland TypeNumber of SpeciesNumber of SpecimensHE
Lowland meadow283612.5050.752
Alpine meadow18862.4210.837
Mountain meadow4212572.5630.686
Temperate grassland4313513.0530.812
Temperate meadow grassland14532.0550.778
Temperate deserts3815272.4370.670
Temperate desert grassland 174471.8870.666
Temperate steppe desert172081.7030.601
Table 6. The number of species, number of specimens, and Shannon–Wiener and Pielou indices of Acridoidea at different altitudes.
Table 6. The number of species, number of specimens, and Shannon–Wiener and Pielou indices of Acridoidea at different altitudes.
Altitude (Meters)Number of SpeciesNumber of SpecimensHE
0–500 407712.9060.788
500–10005213682.9760.743
1000–1500 6618313.2370.725
1500–2000 359172.8670.806
2000–2500 261852.6340.806
2500–3000201322.5680.815
3000–3500 18862.4210.837
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; He, Y.; Yuan, G.; Pu, X.; Zhou, C. Influence of Grassland Habitats on Acridoidea (Orthoptera) Species Diversity in Different Divisions of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. Biology 2025, 14, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14010014

AMA Style

Liu Y, Wang S, He Y, Yuan G, Pu X, Zhou C. Influence of Grassland Habitats on Acridoidea (Orthoptera) Species Diversity in Different Divisions of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. Biology. 2025; 14(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yuxian, Shaoshan Wang, Yuheng He, Guanzheng Yuan, Xingyu Pu, and Chao Zhou. 2025. "Influence of Grassland Habitats on Acridoidea (Orthoptera) Species Diversity in Different Divisions of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps" Biology 14, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14010014

APA Style

Liu, Y., Wang, S., He, Y., Yuan, G., Pu, X., & Zhou, C. (2025). Influence of Grassland Habitats on Acridoidea (Orthoptera) Species Diversity in Different Divisions of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. Biology, 14(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop