Next Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Dynamics and mRNA Translation: A Local Synaptic Tale
Previous Article in Journal
Peronema canescens as a Source of Immunomodulatory Agents: A New Opportunity and Perspective
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/biology13090745
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Potential Geographical Distribution of Hydrocera triflora since the Last Interglacial and under Future Climate Scenarios

by
Qitao Su
1,2,
Zhixuan Du
2,
Yi Luo
2,
Bing Zhou
2,
Yi’an Xiao
2,* and
Zhengrong Zou
1,*
1
College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
2
School of Life Sciences, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 330049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(9), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090745
Submission received: 15 August 2024 / Revised: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 21 September 2024 / Published: 22 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Conservation Biology and Biodiversity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Hydrocera triflora is primarily distributed across southeastern and southern Asia and is classified as endangered within China. The impact of climate change on the spatial distribution of this species remains uncertain. In this study, we employed the MaxEnt model to examine the migration patterns of H. triflora under the influence of climate change. Our findings indicate that the current potential distribution area is more extensive than during the three historical periods analyzed. Furthermore, projections suggest that the potential habitable area for H. triflora will continue to expand to higher altitudes by the year 2100. It is advised that protected areas be established within the current core distribution regions. Concurrently, public awareness and educational initiatives should be enhanced to mitigate the impact of human activities on wild populations. Strengthening the conservation of wild resources is imperative.

Abstract

Hydrocera triflora is a perennial herb found in southeastern and southern Asia. In China, it is only found in Hainan Province. With global climate change, studying the impact of climate change on the distribution of H. triflora can provide a theoretical basis for the scientific protection of this species. In this study, the MaxEnt model was used to predict the potential distribution area of H. triflora in China under historical, current, and future periods based on 66 distribution points and 12 environmental variables. The results were as follows: (i) The main environmental variables affecting the distribution of H. triflora were precipitation in the coldest month and in the wettest quarter, with elevation also being a significant factor. (ii) Over the past three periods, the last interglacial, last glacial maximum, and mid-Holocene, the suitable area for H. triflora initially decreased and then increased. The suitable area reached the lowest value in the last glacial maximum period, at only 27.03 × 104 km2. (iii) The current potential distribution area is 67.81 × 104 km2, and the optimal area is mainly distributed in the Guangxi, Guangdong, and Hainan provinces. (iv) Under future climate scenarios, the potential distribution area of H. triflora is projected to increase by 11.27~90.83 × 104 km2. It is expected to reach a maximum value (158.64 × 104 km2) in 2081~2100 under the SSP-585 climate scenario, with the distribution centroid shifting to higher latitudes. The newly gained optimal habitats will provide potential areas for introduction and ex situ conservation of this species.

1. Introduction

Climate change is becoming an increasingly important issue that deserves our attention [1,2]. According to a relevant report released by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), temperatures are expected to keep rising in the future due to global warming [3]. Long-term field monitoring data indicate that global warming may significantly influence the geographic distribution patterns of species, with effects differing among species [4,5]. For example, climate warming has led to an upward shift in the elevation range of European beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) by 70 m in the Montreal Mountains of Spain over the past 55 years, resulting in their replacement by lower-elevation species in their original habitats [6]. Similarly, in the Qinling Mountains of China, the upper limit of the distribution elevation of Larix chinensis has increased by 24.7 m, while the distribution elevation of Abies fargesii and Betula albosinensis has exhibited only minor changes [7].
In addition to long-term field records, species distribution models (e.g., MaxEnt [8,9], GARP [10,11], GAM [12], GLM [13]) can be employed to assess the impact of climate change on species distribution patterns [4,14,15]. The MaxEnt model predicts the distribution of a specific species within a given area by establishing a relationship between environmental variables and species distribution [16]. Compared to other species distribution models, the MaxEnt model is currently considered an ideal predictive tool. Due to its high precision, it can generate more accurate results even with limited species distribution data [9,17].
Hydrocera triflora is an aquatic herb belonging to the genus Hydrocera, which is a monotypic of the family Balsaminaceae. Although it is not considered endangered according to the IUCN categories, it is endangered in China. It was listed by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China as regionally extinct (RE) in 2013 [18], but was reclassified as endangered (EN) in 2023 [19]. There is an urgent need for targeted conservation efforts. Additionally, H. triflora exhibits primitive characteristics, such as free petals and a fleshy, indehiscent pseudoberry fruit, and is adapted to aquatic environments [20]. These traits are of significant importance for studying the origin, floral evolution, and adaptive differentiation within the Balsaminaceae family. Currently, research on H. triflora has predominantly concentrated on genomics [21], morphological structure [22], and chemical composition [23], among other aspects. However, investigations into the conditions of its wild populations remain limited. Over time, the habitat of H. triflora has diminished due to escalating land development demands, human activities, and various economic development initiatives. Studying the distribution patterns of H. triflora is essential for enhancing the exploration and conservation of its wild populations.
In this study, the MaxEnt model was employed to analyze the potentially suitable habitats for H. trifloral in China during the last interglacial (LIG), last glacial maximum (LGM), and mid-Holocene (MH) periods, as well as under three future climate scenarios, namely, the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP-126, SSP-245, SSP-585), across four time periods (2021–2040, 2041–2060, 2061–2080, and 2081–2100). The research objectives were as follows: (i) to identify the potential distribution area of H. triflora in the current period and determine the environmental factors influencing its distribution; (ii) to analyze the potential distribution area for H. triflora under historical and future climate change scenarios; and (iii) to assess the changes in potential habitat distribution across historical, current, and future periods. It is crucial to utilize scientific research on the potential habitats of this plant for the successful reintroduction and restoration of the species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Distribution Data Acquisition and Processing

The global distribution data of H. triflora were obtained from GBIF (https://www.gbif.org/, accessed on 3 March 2023), NSII (http://nsii.org.cn/, accessed on 3 March 2023), PPBC (http://ppbc.iplant.cn/, accessed on 3 March 2023), and other websites and from academic papers from CNKI [24], as well as field data. A total of 145 records were collected, with 64 recorded in GBIF. The NSII contributed 12 records, while the PPBC provided 54 records. Additionally, 13 records were sourced from CNKI and 2 records were obtained through on-site investigations. From the PPBC distribution records, the Baidu Map coordinate pick-up system (https://api.map.baidu.com/lbsapi/getpoint/index.html, accessed on 4 March 2023) was used to upload the location to obtain the distribution of the species in terms of longitude and latitude. For the distributed data obtained from the GBIF, NSII, and academic papers of the CNKI, invalid information such as errors, noncoordinate points, and duplicate points was removed. To avoid data overfitting, ENM Tools was used to filter all distribution data and divide the map into 1 × 1 m grids, and only one distribution record was reserved in each grid. The distribution data for H. triflora were acquired through multiple methodologies, resulting in the identification of 17 distribution records within China. To improve the accuracy of the predictive models, global distribution data for H. triflora were also incorporated. A total of 66 distribution points were selected for analysis (Figure 1A).
The empirical investigation revealed that the flowering period of the H. triflora population in Haikou City extended from June to December, while the fruiting period spanned from June to January of the subsequent year. The duration of a single flowering event averaged 4.29 ± 0.85 days, with the stamen phase lasting 2.21 ± 0.64 days and the pistil phase persisting for 2.08 ± 0.95 days. The primary pollinator identified was Xylocopa sp. (Figure 1B). This species predominantly inhabited environments characterized by paddy fields, lakes, and wetlands (Figure 1C).

2.2. Environmental Parameters for Model Simulation

The climate data for the three historical periods of the LIG, LGM, and MH as well as the current period were obtained from WorldClim-Global Climate Data version 2.1 with a spatial resolution of 2.5 arc min [25]. The future climate data for the four time periods of 2021–2040, 2041–2060, 2061–2080, and 2081–2100 are based on three different climate scenarios (SSP-126, SSP-245, and SSP-585, SSP—shared socioeconomic pathways) of the global climate models (GCMs) of BCC_CSM2_MR. The slope and slope direction were extracted from DEM digital elevation data with an accuracy of 25 m, which were obtained from the Computer Network Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the International Website of Scientific Data (http://www.gscloud.cn/, accessed on 5 March 2023).
ENMTools was used to conduct correlation analysis on 19 climate and environmental variables. When the correlation between two climate and environmental variables was greater than 0.8 [26,27], the climate and environmental factor with the greatest contribution to the influence on H. triflora distribution among the two climate and environmental variables was retained for subsequent analysis. A total of 12 environmental variables were used for analysis (Table 1), including 9 climate factors, namely, bio02, bio04, bio06, bio10, bio11, bio14, bio15, bio16, and bio19, and 3 terrain factors, namely, elevation, slope, and slope direction.

2.3. MaxEnt Model Description and Modeling

The MaxEnt model (version 3.4.1) was used to predict species distributions based on 66 global distribution records of H. triflora and 12 selected environmental variables. A total of 75% of the distribution data were randomly selected for training, and the remaining 25% of the distribution data were used for testing to determine the influence of each selected environmental factor on the H. triflora distribution. The jackknife test of variable importance was used. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to verify the accuracy of the model prediction.
The AUC is positively correlated with the prediction accuracy of the MaxEnt model and ranges from 0 to 1. When the AUC is less than 0.6, the prediction fails. When the AUC is greater than 0.6 and less than 0.7, the prediction accuracy is poor. When the AUC is greater than 0.7 and less than 0.8, the prediction is normal. When the AUC is greater than 0.8 and less than 0.9, the prediction accuracy is better. When the AUC is greater than 0.9, the prediction accuracy is very high [27,28].

2.4. Division of Potentially Suitable Areas

Based on the prediction results of the MaxEnt model, the Jenks natural breaks algorithm in ArcGIS 10.8 software was used to classify the suitable areas [29,30], and the suitability levels were divided into optimal areas, suitable areas, marginal areas, and unsuitable areas according to the probability of occurrence.

3. Results

3.1. MaxEnt Model Evaluations and Environmental Characteristics of H. triflora

The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the model was 0.990 (Figure 2), which exceeds the threshold of 0.90. Consequently, the predictive performance of the MaxEnt model is considered highly accurate and reliable.
Precipitation in the wettest quarter, the minimum temperature of the coldest month, and elevation are the main environmental variables that impact the geographical distribution of H. triflora (Table 2); their contribution rates are 36.10%, 24.30%, and 20.00%, respectively, and the total contribution rate of the above three environmental factors is 80.4%. The other variables have a combined contribution rate of only 19.6%. The combined contribution rate of the other variables is only 19.6%. The response curve of H. triflora to key environmental variables (Figure 3) indicates that, to achieve a probability exceeding 50%, the precipitation in the wettest quarter must be greater than 722.24 mm, the minimum temperature of the coldest month should be above 19.79 °C, and the elevation should be less than 50.58 m.

3.2. Historical Potential Distribution Area for H. triflora

The potential distribution area of H. triflora in the past three periods was smaller compared to the current period (Figure 4). Notably, during the last interglacial (LIG) period, the potential distribution area reached its maximum extent of 61.14 × 104 km2, predominantly located in southern Guangxi Province, central and southern Guangdong Province, and northeastern Hainan Province. In contrast, during the last glacial maximum (LGM), the potential distribution area contracted significantly to a minimum of 27.03 × 104 km2, with the distribution primarily confined to the southern extremity of Guangxi Province and the central and southern regions of Guangdong Province. During the MH period, the potential distribution area expanded to 55.88 × 104 km2, with the optimal habitat predominantly located in southwestern Guangdong Province and northeastern Hainan Province.

3.3. Current Potential Distribution Area for H. triflora

Under current climatic conditions (Figure 4), our findings indicate that the potential distribution area of H. triflora is primarily situated in the low-altitude regions of south-central China, southeastern China, and southern China, encompassing a total area of 67.81 × 104 km2. This represents approximately 7.04% of China’s total land area. The optimal area is 8.45 × 104 km2, accounting for 0.88% of China’s total land area. This area is predominantly located in Hainan Province, Guangdong and Guangxi provinces, and the northern region of Taiwan Province. In addition, Poyang Lake in Jiangxi Province is also a potential distribution area for H. triflora (Figure 4). Compared with those in the LIG, LGM, and MH periods, the potential distribution areas of H. triflora under the current climate scenarios have increased by 6.67, 70.78, and 11.93 × 104 km2, respectively. However, the potential distribution areas have remained constant at 52.48, 2.11, and 34.94 × 104 km2, respectively. The potential distribution areas of 15.23, 65.60, and 32.77 × 104 km2 increased, and an area of 7.38, 0, and 0.38 × 104 km2 decreased (Figure 5).

3.4. Changes in Future Potential Distribution Areas for H. triflora

Under the SSP-126, SSP-245, and SSP-585 climate scenarios in the future, the potential distribution area of H. triflora in China is projected to gradually increase over time (Figure 6). The total potential distribution area will reach 79.08~158.64 × 104 km2, with an overall increase of 11.27~90.83 × 104 km2. The maximum potential distribution area, estimated at 158.64 × 104 km2 (Figure 5), is expected to occur from 2081 to 2100 under the SSP-585 scenario. By 2100, the potential distribution area of H. triflora under the SSP-126, SSP-245, and SSP-585 climate scenarios will have increased, with the newly increased area ranging from 21.33 to 111.34 × 104 km2 and the lost area below 9.29 × 104 km2. During 2021–2040, the area of potential distribution area will decrease the most under the SSP-126 climate scenario (Figure 6). Compared to the current climate scenario, the potential distribution area of H. triflora is projected to expand under three future climate scenarios, although the trends in these changes will not be uniform. Under the SSP-126 climate scenario, the total potential distribution area of H. triflora will reach its peak during 2021–2040, exhibiting an initial increase followed by a decrease. However, the optimal habitat area will continue to expand. Specifically, regions such as Poyang Lake and the western side of Taiwan Province are anticipated to transition from suitable to optimal habitats, with the exception of Guangdong Province and Hainan Province. Under the SSP-245 climate scenario, the potential distribution area of H. triflora in the future will always increase. Under the SSP-585 climate scenario, the potential distribution area will first decrease and then increase and will peak from 2081 to 2100 (Figure 4). Under both the SSP-245 and SSP-585 climate scenarios, the optimal habitats are predominantly located in Hainan Province, south-central Guangdong Province, Guangxi Province, western Taiwan Province, the Poyang Lake basin, and the Yangtze River region at the junction of Jiangxi, Anhui, and Hubei provinces. Over time, the potentially suitable areas for H. triflora will gradually expand northward in Guangdong and Guangxi Provinces. At the same time, the optimal area of Poyang Lake expands to both sides of the Yangtze River.

3.5. Migration of the Distribution Centroid in the Potential Distribution Area under Different Periods

Under the current climate scenario (Figure 7), the distribution centroid of H. triflora is located in Chenzhou city, Hunan Province (113°29′21″ E, 26°50′37″ N), and during the LIG period, the distribution centroid is located in Chenzhou city, Hunan Province (113°57′7″ E, 25°57′28″ N). In contrast, during the LGM (Figure 7), the distribution centroid shifts 3.98° southward to Maming city, Guangdong Province (110°50′11″ E, 21°58′23″ N), representing a displacement of 473.862 km from the current centroid. During the MH period (Figure 6), the distribution centroid shifts 2.13° towards higher latitudes, relocating to Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province (112°30′32″ E, 24°5′55″ N), which is 93.837 km from the current distribution centroid. Under the three future climate scenarios (Figure 7), the distribution centroid of H. triflora is projected to shift further northward, especially by 2100, and under the SSP-585 scenario, the distribution centroid will shift 2.62° to higher latitudes, reaching its northernmost point, which is located in Changsha, Hunan Province (112°47′39″ E, 28°11′9″ N), migrating 299.992 km. Under the SSP-126 climate scenario, the distribution centroid will shift to higher latitudes, reaching the northernmost point in 2041–2060, which is located in Zhuzhou city, Hunan Province (113°18′56″ E, 27°20′4″ N), 203.261 km away from the current distribution centroid, and will gradually shift to lower latitudes in the next 40 years. In 2100, it is located in Hengyang city, Hunan Province (112°59′17″ E, 26°37′15″ N), at a distance of 121.278 km from the current distribution centroid. Under the SPS-245 climate scenario, the distribution centroid reaches the northernmost point of Zhuzhou city in Hunan Province (113°19′14″ E, 27°44′34″ N) during 2061–2080 and migrates 249.431 km to higher altitudes. Additionally, in Zhuzhou city (113°17′35″ E, 27°37′40″ N), the centroid moves 0.12° south, a distance of 236.215 km from its current distribution centroid.

4. Discussion

4.1. Model Accuracy Assessment

Predictions regarding the potential distribution of endangered species are becoming an integral component of conservation and management strategies [31,32,33]. Currently, among the various species distribution models available, the MaxEnt model is extensively utilized across multiple disciplines due to its benefits, including the ability to function with small sample sizes, ease of operation, and high accuracy [11,14,34,35]. The area under the curve (AUC) is one of the most frequently employed metrics for assessing the accuracy of the MaxEnt model [33]. The AUC quantifies the area under the ROC curve, which plots the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1-specificity) at different threshold levels [36]. A higher AUC value corresponds to a lower overall omission rate and improved performance of the omission curve, signifying a better fit of the model to the prediction results [33,37,38]. In this study, the MaxEnt model was employed to predict the distribution of the endangered plant species H. triflora in potential distribution areas within China. Additionally, a jackknife test was conducted to assess the influence of each selected factor. The model achieved an AUC of 0.990, indicating that 99% of the training presences were accurately predicted, thereby demonstrating a high level of accuracy in the results.

4.2. Environmental Factors Limit the Distribution Area of H. triflora

Temperature and precipitation are pivotal climatic determinants influencing species distribution [33,39]. Our findings indicate that precipitation during the wettest quarter, the minimum temperature of the coldest month, and elevation significantly impact the distribution of H. triflora. We employed the response curves of environmental factors to elucidate the relationship between potential habitat areas and environmental variables [30]. When the probability of species occurrence exceeds 50%, the corresponding environmental conditions are deemed conducive to plant growth [30,40]. Our study found that when the precipitation in the wettest quarter is greater than 722.24 mm, the minimum temperature of the coldest month exceeds 19.79 °C, and the elevation is below 50.58 m, the probability of the existence of H. triflora is greater than 50%. The best environmental conditions for survival are when the precipitation of the wettest quarter is 776.41 mm, the coldest month is 22.78 °C, and the elevation is 5.73 m. H. triflora is a thermophilic aquatic plant that also adapts to terrestrial habitats, thriving in consistently humid environments and requiring high levels of both water and temperature. The minimum temperature of the coldest month is a critical determinant for the winter survival of H. triflora. While elevation accounts for 20% of the species’ distribution, temperature decreases with increasing altitude also play a role [41]. Consequently, we posit that the impact of elevation on the potential distribution of H. triflora is primarily mediated by temperature. Furthermore, H. triflora predominantly inhabits aquatic environments where human activities are more prevalent, posing a significant constraint on population expansion.

4.3. Changes in Potential Distribution Area under Historic, Current, and Future Periods

The response of plants to climate change, driven by alternating ice ages and interglacial periods, is evidenced through geographical distribution migration and adaptive evolution [42,43]. During the LIG period, the average land temperature was 1–2 °C higher than current levels, resulting in a climate environment relatively analogous to the present [44]. Consequently, more suitable habitats for H. triflora emerged, with the primary potential distribution areas closely resembling those identified in the current study. With the arrival of the LGM, the potential distribution areas of H. triflora contracted southward, and the distribution centroid migrated to lower latitudes. This shift is likely attributable to the LGM being the coldest and driest period since the Quaternary [45]. During this epoch, global average temperatures were 5–12 °C lower than present-day levels [43], which may have significantly contributed to the substantial reduction in the potential distribution area of H. triflora. Simultaneously, extensive portions of the land surface were enveloped by glaciers during this epoch, with glacial coverage in China expanding by a factor of 8.7 compared to the present period [43]. This glaciation posed additional challenges to the survival of H. triflora. With the onset of the MH period, temperatures began to rise gradually [46], resulting in an average land temperature in China that was 1–1.5 °C higher than current levels [47]. Consequently, the potential distribution areas of H. triflora progressively extended to higher latitudes, and the species’ distribution centroid in China shifted northward.
Currently, the suitable and optimal habitats for H. triflora are primarily located in the coastal regions of Hainan Island, the western coastal zone of Taiwan Island, the Leizhou Peninsula, the middle and lower reaches of the Pearl River, and the Poyang Lake basin. Nonetheless, H. triflora has only been documented on Hainan Island, likely due to the Qiongzhou Strait acting as a natural geographical barrier, impeding its dispersal to mainland areas. Similar phenomena are observed in other regions; for example, Cacaiao melanocephalus and Pithecia pithecia are confined to either side of the Rio Blanco River and cannot spread to the other side in Guyana [48]. Metapetrocosmea peltata, which is distributed on both sides of the Changhua River Valley, experiences restricted gene flow due to the river valley acting as a barrier in Hainan. This results in significant genetic differentiation between the two populations [49].
In the future, with anticipated changes in global climate, the potential distribution range of H. triflora is projected to expand beyond its current geographical confines, with the centroid of its distribution shifting towards higher latitudes. However, H. triflora will predominantly remain concentrated in the southern regions of China. Under the SSP-126, SSP-245, and SSP-585 climate scenarios, the extent of potentially suitable habitats for H. triflora is expected to increase to varying degrees, with an increasing trend from SSP-126 to SSP-245, and the highest increase under SSP-585. This phenomenon can be attributed to the SSP-585 scenario being a high radiative forcing scenario with an average temperature increase of 2.4~4.8 °C by 2100. In contrast, the SSP-126 scenario has a temperature increase of less than 2.0 °C, and SSP-245 is between SSP-126 and SSP-585 [50]. Consequently, the SSP-585 scenario would provide more favorable hydrothermal conditions for H. triflora, whereas the SSP-126 scenario would offer the least favorable conditions among the three climate scenarios. The potential habitable area of H. triflora reaches a maximum of 158.64 × 104 km2 under the SSP-585 climate scenario in 2100. Under the most extreme SSP-585 climate scenario, the suitable and optimal areas for H. triflora are projected to expand significantly towards higher latitudes compared to current conditions. Additionally, a limited number of low-altitude regions in the provinces of Yunnan, Xinjiang, Sichuan, Chongqing, and Tibet have also emerged as optimal areas. This expansion is likely attributable to global warming, which has resulted in increased temperature and precipitation in these regions, thereby rendering them suitable for H. triflora. These newly identified optimal areas will offer new distribution zones with appropriate field environments for the introduction and conservation of the species.
H. triflora is predominantly found in rice paddies, wetlands, and other aquatic habitats with significant human activity in Hainan Province. It is commonly used as pig feed and is extensively harvested, potentially leading to a decline in its population. In addition, H. triflora habitat can also be compressed by urbanization, man-made landscapes, and other anthropogenic factors. This situation necessitates governmental intervention to raise public awareness and guide residents in strengthening the protection of wild populations. To better understand H. triflora’s main distribution areas, we need to identify key functional zones, conduct detailed habitat surveys, investigate factors affecting its distribution and growth, and collect germplasm resources for a comprehensive database. Concurrently, the establishment of local conservation areas is a crucial protective measure that will support the recovery and expansion of wild populations.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the MaxEnt model was used to predict the past, present, and future potential habitat area of H. triflora. The main results show that: (i) The main environmental variables affecting the distribution of H. triflora are precipitation in the coldest month and in the wettest quarter, and elevation is also a main factor. (ii) In the three past periods of LIG, LGM, and MH, the suitable area of H. triflora tended to decrease first and then increase, and the suitable area reached the lowest value in the LGM period, at only 27.03 × 104 km2. Southern Guangxi and southern Guangdong were optimal areas in the three past periods. The centroid of the species distribution in the LIG, LGM, and MH shifted first to low latitudes and then to high latitudes. (iii) The current potential distribution area is 67.81 × 104 km2, accounting for 7.04% of China, and it is mainly distributed in southern China, of which the optimal area is mainly distributed in Guangxi, Guangdong, and Hainan provinces. (iv) Under the future climate scenario, the potential distribution area of H. triflora increases by 11.27~90.83 × 104 km2 under the three climate scenarios and reaches a maximum value (158.64 × 104 km2) from 2081 to 2100 under the SSP-585 climate scenario, and the distribution centroid of H. triflora shifts to higher latitudes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.S. and Y.X.; methodology, Q.S. and Z.D.; software, Q.S. and Y.L.; validation, Q.S., Z.D., Y.X. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, Q.S.; investigation, B.Z.; resources, Y.X. and Z.Z.; data curation, Q.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.X.; visualization, Z.Z.; supervision, Y.X. and Z.Z.; project administration, Z.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41561012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Species occurrence records were obtained from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility database (GBIF: https://www.gbif.org/, accessed on 3 March 2023), the Plant Photo Bank of China (PPBC: http://ppbc.iplant.cn/, accessed on 3 March 2023), the National Specimen Information Infrastructure database (NSII: http://nsii.org.cn/2017/home.php, accessed on 3 March 2023), and our field surveys.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brown, P.T.; Caldeira, K. Greater future global warming inferred from Earth’s recent energy budget. Nature 2017, 552, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kaufman, D.S.; Broadman, E. Revisiting the Holocene global temperature conundrum. Nature 2023, 614, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ma, B.; Sun, J. Predicting the distribution of Stipa purpurea across the Tibetan Plateau via the MaxEnt model. Bmc Ecol. 2018, 18, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Uszko, W.; Huss, M.; Gardmark, A. Smaller species but larger stages: Warming effects on inter- and intraspecific community size structure. Ecology 2022, 103, e3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ntilde, P.; Uelas, J.; Boada, M.I. A global change-induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain). Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003, 9, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shi, H.; Zhou, Q.; Xie, F.L.; He, N.J.; He, R.; Zhang, K.R.; Zhang, Q.F.; Dang, H.S. Disparity in elevational shifts of upper species limits in response to recent climate warming in the Qinling Mountains, North-central China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 706, 135718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rewicz, A.; Myśliwy, M.; Rewicz, T.; Adamowski, W.; Kolanowska, M. Contradictory effect of climate change on American and European populations of Impatiens capensis Meerb.—Is this herb a global threat? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 850, 157959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shao, X.; Liu, X.; Cai, J.; Cai, Y.Z.; Cui, B.S. Identifying priority areas of Four Major Chinese carps’ species in the Pearl River basin based on the MaxEnt model. Waters Ecol. Environ. 2023, 5, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stockman, A.K.; Beamer, D.A.; Bond, J.E. An evaluation of a GARP model as an approach to predicting the spatial distribution of non-vagile invertebrate species. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 12, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yu, W.W.; Chen, B. Mapping the potential of mangrove forest restoration based on species distribution models: A case study in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 142321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Murase, H.; Nagashima, H.; Yonezaki, S.; Matsukura, R.; Kitakado, T. Application of a generalized additive model (GAM) to reveal relationships between environmental factors and distributions of pelagic fish and krill: A case study in Sendai Bay, Japan. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mahanand, S.; Behera, M.D.; Roy, P.S. Rapid assessment of plant diversity using MODIS biophysical proxies. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 311, 114778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fournier, A.; Penone, C.; Pennino, M.G.; Courchamp, F. Predicting future invaders and future invasions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 201803456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ngarega, B.K.; Nzei, J.M.; Saina, J.K.; Halmy, M.W.A.; Chen, J.M.; Li, Z.Z. Mapping the habitat suitability of Ottelia species in Africa. Plant Divers. 2022, 44, 468–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jane, E.; Leathwick, J.R. Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction across Space and Time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 2009, 40, 677–697. [Google Scholar]
  17. Costa, G.C.; Nogueira, C.; Machado, R.B.; Colli, G.R. Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: A field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of The People’s Republic of China. The China Biodiversity Red List-Higher Plants Volume. Available online: https://www.plantplus.cn/rep/protlist/4?key=Hydrocera%20triflora (accessed on 18 January 2024).
  19. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of The People’s Republic of China. Announcement on the Release of The China Biodiversity Red List—Vertebrate Volume (2020) and The China Biodiversity Red List-Higher Plants Volume (2020). Available online: https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202305/t20230522_1030745.html (accessed on 18 January 2024).
  20. Chen, Y.L. Flora of China (Volume 47-2); Science Press: Beijing, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Z.Z.; Saina, J.; Gichira, A.; Kyalo, C.; Wang, Q.F.; Chen, J.M. Comparative Genomics of the Balsaminaceae Sister Genera Hydrocera triflora and Impatiens pinfanensis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ramadevi, D.; Narayana, L.L. Morphology of the flower and fruit of Hydrocera triflora Wight and Arn. emend Venkat. and Dutt—An elucidation. Proc. Plant Sci. 1990, 100, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  23. Puri, R.; Choudhary, A.K.; Barman, P.; Mishra, G.; Geeta, R. Two unusual conjugated fatty acids, parinaric acid and α-eleostearic acid, are present in several Impatiens species, but not in congener Hydrocera triflora. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2022, 28, 1109–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Lv, D.; Huang, S.; Qi, H.S.; Ren, J.F.; Pan, M. Resource status and investigation of Hydrocera triflora of endangered aquatic plants in Hainan Province. Chin. Hortic. Abstr. 2017, 32, 67–91. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yin, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ying, B. Phylogeographic structure of Syntrichia caninervis Mitt, a xerophytic moss, highlights the expanded during glacial period. J. Plant Ecol. 2023, 16, rta057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, M.; Guan, Q. Prediction of potential suitable areas for Broussonetia papyrifera in China using the MaxEnt model and CIMP6 data. J. Plant Ecol. 2023, 16, rtad006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, B.; Cheng, X.F.; Kong, R. MaxEnt Modeling Based on CMIP6 Models to Project Potential Suitable Zones for Cunninghamia lanceolata in China. Forests 2021, 12, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Meng, Y.; Ma, J.M.; Wang, Y.Q.; Mo, Y.H. Prediction of distribution area of Loropetalum chinense based on Maxent model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 8287–8296. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, Y.; Xie, L.; Zhou, X.; Chen, R.F. Prediction of the potentially suitable areas of Leonurus japonicus in China based on future climate change using the optimized MaxEnt model. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 13, e10597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Monica, P.; Havel, J.E.; Vander Zanden, M.J. Using maximum entropy to predict the potential distribution of an invasive freshwater snail. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61, 457–471. [Google Scholar]
  32. Taylor, I.E.P.; Frey, J.K. Predicting the distribution of a rare chipmunk (Neotamias quadrivittatus oscuraensis): Comparing MaxEnt and occupancy models. J. Mammal. 2020, 101, 1035–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xie, C.; Li, M.; Chen, L.; Jim, C.Y. Climate-driven changes to the spatial–temporal pattern of endangered tree Toona ciliata Roem. in China. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2024, 155, 2071–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sarma, K.; Kumar, A.; Krishna, M.; Medhi, M.; Tripathi, O.P. Predicting Suitable Habitats for the Vulnerable Eastern Hoolock Gibbon, Hoolock leuconedys, in India Using the MaxEnt Model. Folia. Primatol. 2015, 86, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Su, Q.T.; Zou, Z.R.; Du, Z.X.; Zhou, B. Distribution pattern of suitable area and early warning of invasive species Mirabilis japala under climate change scenarios in China. Chin. J. Ecol. 2024, 43, 833–841. [Google Scholar]
  36. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distribution. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muscarella, R.; Galante, P.J.; Guardia, M.S.; Boria, R.A.; Kass, J.M.; Uriarte, M.; Anderson, R.P. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Merow, C.; Smith, M.; Silander, J.J. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 2013, 36, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fang, J.; Lechowicz, M.J. Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33, 1804–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, J.; Liu, X.P.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, D.F.; Xie, C.X.; Liu, X. Prediction for the potential distribution area of Codonopsis pilosula at global scale based on Maxent model. Chine J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 28, 992–1000. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, K.; Sun, J.; Cheng, G. Effect of Altitude and Latitude on Surface Air Temperature across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Mt. Sci. 2011, 8, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, Q.; Dong, S.; Yang, L.; Qi, X.J. Prediction of potential distribution of Cypripedium macranthos under climate change scenarios in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 44, 209–223. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen, D.; Kang, H.; Liu, C. An Overview on the Potential Quaternary Glacial Refugia of Plants in China Mainland. Bull. Bot. Res. 2011, 31, 623–632. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.F.; Tan, C.C.; Yuan, Y.C.; Nie, W.; Liu, J.F.; Chang, E.M.; Jia, Z.R. Simulation of Suitable Distribution Areas of Picea koraiensis in China Since the Last Interglacial and under Future Climate Scenarios. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2023, 59, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cohmap, M. Climatic Changes of the Last 18,000 Years: Observations and Model Simulations. Science 1998, 241, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Birks, J.; Battarbee, R.; Mackay, A.; Oldfield, F. Global Change in the Holocene; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hou, G.; Fang, X. Characteristics of Holocene Temperature Change in China. Prog. Geogr. 2011, 30, 1075–1080. [Google Scholar]
  48. Boubli, J.P.; Ribas, C.; Alfaro, J.W.L.; Alfaro, M.E.; Silva, M.N.F.D.; Pinho, G.M.; Farias, I.P. Spatial and temporal patterns of diversification on the Amazon: A test of the riverine hypothesis for all diurnal primates of Rio Negro and Rio Branco in Brazil. Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 2015, 82, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, G.; Ling, S.; Chen, W.; Ren, M.X.; Tang, L. Effects of geographic isolation caused by Changhua River on gentic diversity of Hainan-endemic Metapetrocosmea peltata (Gesneriaceae). Guihaia 2020, 40, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, L.; Chen, X.; Xin, X. Short commentary on CMIP6 Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP). Clim. Chang. Res. 2019, 15, 519–525. [Google Scholar]
Biology 13 00745 g001
Figure 1. Current spatial distribution and habitat of H. triflora. ((A): Current spatial distribution of H. triflora; (B): Xylocopa sp. Major pollinator of H. triflora; (C): The habitat of H. trifloral in Hainan Province).
Figure 1. Current spatial distribution and habitat of H. triflora. ((A): Current spatial distribution of H. triflora; (B): Xylocopa sp. Major pollinator of H. triflora; (C): The habitat of H. trifloral in Hainan Province).
Biology 13 00745 g001
Biology 13 00745 g002
Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of the MaxEnt models.
Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of the MaxEnt models.
Biology 13 00745 g002
Biology 13 00745 g003
Figure 3. Response curves of existence probability of H. triflora for environmental variables.
Figure 3. Response curves of existence probability of H. triflora for environmental variables.
Biology 13 00745 g003
Biology 13 00745 g004
Figure 4. Distribution of potential suitable areas of H. triflora in historical, current, and future climate scenarios.
Figure 4. Distribution of potential suitable areas of H. triflora in historical, current, and future climate scenarios.
Biology 13 00745 g004
Biology 13 00745 g005
Figure 5. The changes in potential suitable area of H. triflora in China under historical, current, and future climate scenarios. ((A): The potential suitable area of H. triflora, historic and current; (B): The potential suitable area of H. triflora in SSP-126 climate scenario; (C): The potential suitable area of H. triflora in SSP-245 climate scenario; (D): The potential suitable area of H. triflora in SSP-585 climate scenario).
Figure 5. The changes in potential suitable area of H. triflora in China under historical, current, and future climate scenarios. ((A): The potential suitable area of H. triflora, historic and current; (B): The potential suitable area of H. triflora in SSP-126 climate scenario; (C): The potential suitable area of H. triflora in SSP-245 climate scenario; (D): The potential suitable area of H. triflora in SSP-585 climate scenario).
Biology 13 00745 g005
Biology 13 00745 g006
Figure 6. The changes in the adaptive area of H. triflora under future climate scenarios (the black dots indicate the suitable areas of H. triflora in different climate scenarios).
Figure 6. The changes in the adaptive area of H. triflora under future climate scenarios (the black dots indicate the suitable areas of H. triflora in different climate scenarios).
Biology 13 00745 g006
Biology 13 00745 g007
Figure 7. Distribution centroid of H. triflora under different climate change scenarios. (The green line indicates the historical migration path; the purple line indicates the migration path under SSP-126 climate change scenario in 2021–2100; the blue line indicates the migration path under SSP-245 climate change scenario in 2021–2100; the earthy yellow line indicates the migration path under SSP-585 climate change scenario in 2021–2100).
Figure 7. Distribution centroid of H. triflora under different climate change scenarios. (The green line indicates the historical migration path; the purple line indicates the migration path under SSP-126 climate change scenario in 2021–2100; the blue line indicates the migration path under SSP-245 climate change scenario in 2021–2100; the earthy yellow line indicates the migration path under SSP-585 climate change scenario in 2021–2100).
Biology 13 00745 g007
Table 1. Contribution of variables for modeling.
Table 1. Contribution of variables for modeling.
VariableDescriptionPercent Contribution/%
bio02Mean diurnal range3.9
bio04Variation in temperature seasonality0.9
bio06Minimum temperature of the coldest month24.3
Bio10Mean temperature of warmest quarter4.5
Bio11Mean temperature of coldest quarter3.9
Bio14Precipitation of the driest month0.6
Bio15Variation in precipitation seasonality3.4
Bio16Precipitation of wettest quarter36.1
Bio19Precipitation of coldest quarter3.2
ElevElevation position of species20.0
SlopeSlope position of species1.5
AspectAspect position of species1.0
Table 2. The potential distribution area of H. triflora in China under historical, current, and future climate scenarios (×104 km2).
Table 2. The potential distribution area of H. triflora in China under historical, current, and future climate scenarios (×104 km2).
Climate ScenarioYearOptimal AreaSuitable AreaMarginal AreaUnsuitable Area
LIG7.4313.7939.92902.71
LGM1.604.3321.10936.82
MH4.779.8141.30907.97
Current8.4516.1143.25896.04
SSP-1262021–20408.8315.3654.89884.82
SSP-1262041–206010.8123.8668.04861.14
SSP-1262061–208013.4924.3456.64869.38
SSP-1262081–210013.4619.9749.03881.39
SSP-2452021–204013.9325.6452.02872.26
SSP-2452041–206015.5628.1165.36854.82
SSP-2452061–208015.8634.5667.95845.47
SSP-2452081–210022.7235.2761.51844.35
SSP-5852021–204012.3425.2860.46865.76
SSP-5852041–206014.9020.3247.92880.71
SSP-5852061–208034.0544.3552.29833.15
SSP-5852081–210075.9445.9736.72805.21
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, Q.; Du, Z.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, B.; Xiao, Y.; Zou, Z. MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Potential Geographical Distribution of Hydrocera triflora since the Last Interglacial and under Future Climate Scenarios. Biology 2024, 13, 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090745

AMA Style

Su Q, Du Z, Luo Y, Zhou B, Xiao Y, Zou Z. MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Potential Geographical Distribution of Hydrocera triflora since the Last Interglacial and under Future Climate Scenarios. Biology. 2024; 13(9):745. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Qitao, Zhixuan Du, Yi Luo, Bing Zhou, Yi’an Xiao, and Zhengrong Zou. 2024. "MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Potential Geographical Distribution of Hydrocera triflora since the Last Interglacial and under Future Climate Scenarios" Biology 13, no. 9: 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090745

APA Style

Su, Q., Du, Z., Luo, Y., Zhou, B., Xiao, Y., & Zou, Z. (2024). MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Potential Geographical Distribution of Hydrocera triflora since the Last Interglacial and under Future Climate Scenarios. Biology, 13(9), 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop