Next Article in Journal
Intraspecific Comparative Analysis Reveals Genomic Variation of Didymella arachidicola and Pathogenicity Factors Potentially Related to Lesion Phenotype
Previous Article in Journal
HOXA10 DNA Methylation Level in the Endometrium Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Cingulum and Uncinate Fasciculus Microstructural Abnormalities in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies

by
Fatemeh Rashidi
1,
Mohammad Hossein Khanmirzaei
1,
Farbod Hosseinzadeh
1,
Zahra Kolahchi
1,
Niloofar Jafarimehrabady
2,
Bardia Moghisseh
3 and
Mohammad Hadi Aarabi
4,*
1
School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran 1417613151, Iran
2
Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
3
School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Science, Arak 3848176941, Iran
4
Department of Neuroscience (DNS), Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, 35128 Padua, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(3), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030475
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 12 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 20 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Neuroscience)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This article reviews the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to evaluate changes in white matter microstructure within two specific fiber tracts in Parkinson’s disease patients. It also examines how these structural changes may be related to cognitive impairments seen in advanced PD patients and provides insight into developing more targeted treatments for different types of Parkinson’s disease.

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is gaining traction in neuroscience research as a tool for evaluating neural fibers. The technique can be used to assess white matter (WM) microstructure in neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson disease (PD). There is evidence that the uncinate fasciculus and the cingulum bundle are involved in the pathogenesis of PD. These fasciculus and bundle alterations correlate with the symptoms and stages of PD. PRISMA 2022 was used to search PubMed and Scopus for relevant articles. Our search revealed 759 articles. Following screening of titles and abstracts, a full-text review, and implementing the inclusion criteria, 62 papers were selected for synthesis. According to the review of selected studies, WM integrity in the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum bundles can vary according to symptoms and stages of Parkinson disease. This article provides structural insight into the heterogeneous PD subtypes according to their cingulate bundle and uncinate fasciculus changes. It also examines if there is any correlation between these brain structures’ structural changes with cognitive impairment or depression scales like Geriatric Depression Scale-Short (GDS). The results showed significantly lower fractional anisotropy values in the cingulum bundle compared to healthy controls as well as significant correlations between FA and GDS scores for both left and right uncinate fasciculus regions suggesting that structural damage from disease progression may be linked to cognitive impairments seen in advanced PD patients. This review help in developing more targeted treatments for different types of Parkinson’s disease, as well as providing a better understanding of how cognitive impairments may be related to these structural changes. Additionally, using DTI scans can provide clinicians with valuable information about white matter tracts which is useful for diagnosing and monitoring disease progression over time.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder that affects 1% of individuals over the age of 60 worldwide [1,2,3]. Symptoms of PD can be divided into two categories: motor and nonmotor. Motor symptoms, which are the most well known, include akinesia (reduced movement), bradykinesia (slowness of movement), tremor, rigidity, gait disturbance, and speech deficits [4]. In recent years, nonmotor symptoms of PD have received increased attention. These symptoms include autonomic dysfunction, sensory issues, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, apathy, depression, and anxiety [5,6]. From a pathophysiological perspective, it is believed that these symptoms result from the loss, degeneration, and impaired neurogenesis of dopaminergic neurons in specific regions of the brain, such as the basal ganglia, the substantia nigra, the hippocampus, the limbic system, and the white matter [7,8,9,10].
Studies utilizing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) on animal models of Parkinson’s disease induced by toxins, resulting in the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN), have yielded inconclusive results regarding changes in DTI measures [11,12].
White matter (WM) degeneration is a commonly observed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding in PD, and it is characterized by abnormal fiber connections in the brain. This degeneration can affect various regions of the brain, including the prefrontal limbic system. This degeneration might also lead to the cognitive impairment and changes in emotion regulation often seen in PD patients [13,14]. Abnormal white matter fibers have been suggested as a potential cause of depression in PD. The limbic system, a complex of brain structures that plays significant roles in memory, language, goal-directed behavior, affective behavior, and emotional behavior, is also affected in PD. The limbic system includes structures such as the cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, mammillary bodies, hypothalamus, and the nucleus accumbens [15,16]. The uncinate fasciculus (Figure 1), which connects the inferior frontal gyrus with the anterior temporal lobe regions, is traditionally a considered part of the limbic system [17]. The cingulum (Figure 1), a bundle of nerve fibers that runs from the orbital frontal cortex, along the corpus callosum’s dorsal surface, and down the temporal lobe, is also an integral part of the limbic system [18,19].
Recent MRI studies have revealed dysfunction of the cingulum in a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Despite limited available data on anatomy and function of the cingulum, it is crucial to unravel hidden interactions of the highly complex limbic system [20]. DTI is a technique used to assess the microstructural composition of white matter by analyzing the movement of water molecules in the brain. It has been used to detect changes in the brain tissue caused by neurological diseases [21]. Intact WM contributes to high fractional anisotropy (FA), which results from high directionality of water diffusion along axon bundles and lower tissue density [22]. Mean diffusivity (MD) is also used to assess the diffusion of water [23]. Additionally, diffusion can be measured parallel or perpendicular to white matter fascicles, known as axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD), respectively. Changes in AD values indicate axonal damage and fragmentation, while changes in RD values indicate changes in axonal density, axonal diameter, and myelination [23].
DTI has been widely used to investigate pathological changes in the WM of PD patients by probing the diffusivity of water molecules within the WM tracts [24].
In this systematic review, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of specific WM fiber tracts, particularly the cingulum bundle and uncinate fasciculus, in Parkinson’s disease patients, in terms of their associations with DTI profiles.

2. Search Strategy and Data Extraction

We performed a systematic search of the published literature to identify the studies that investigated the involvement of uncinate fasciculus and cingulum associated with PD pathology and symptomatology using DTI. We used the broad search terms: “Diffusion Tensor imaging” [All Fields] OR “Diffusion tensor MRI” “[All Fields] OR” “ Diffusion MRI” “[All Fields] OR” “ DTI ”[All Fields]) AND (“Parkinson’s disease “[All Fields] OR ” Parkinson disease “[All Fields] OR ” PD “[All Fields])”. We searched electronic databases including Scopus and PubMed from 2015 to November 2022, This was complemented by manual searching of the related papers through the list of references. To avoid duplication, the results were imported to Covidence software and articles were separately screened by two of the authors (Z.K. and M.H.K.). In case of disagreement, a third person (F.H.) interfered to decide whether to include or exclude articles. Among the search results, abstracts were screened for relevance. Studies which had investigated diseases other than PD or had used imaging methods other than DTI were excluded. Full papers were obtained for studies published in English that performed DTI in PD patients, and further assessed if they had investigated the cingulate bundle and uncinate fasciculus in PD patients to be included in this systematic review. Figure 2 illustrates the process of study selection according to the PRISMA guidelines.

3. Result

In our literature review, we identified 61 studies that investigated the changes in the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum in PD and used the PRISMA guidelines. One additional study was found during the writing process [25].
The studies were conducted globally, with inclusion ranging from 2015 until December 2022, However, several studies examining white matter changes in PD patients were excluded as they were either animal studies. Additionally, any studies that focused on structures other than the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum were also excluded. A summary of the study demographics is presented in Table 1.
All studies except ten [36,40,53,60,63,73,82,84,85,86] included healthy controls.
The sample size of the PD patients varied widely, with a pilot study having only seven female participants [34] and the largest sample size being 205 from the prospective and longitudinal Swedish BioFINDER study [31].
The studies included both male and female participants, with most studies having a predominantly male population. One study [34] only included females, and two studies did not mention the gender distribution [43,45].
The disease duration of Parkinson’s disease ranged from 1 ± 1.3 years in one study [60] to 14.3 ± 7.75 years in another study [35].

4. Cingulum

4.1. PD

A summary of the studies is presented in Table 2. PD is a progressive, degenerative disorder that affects multiple systems in the body. It is characterized by the accumulation of α-synuclein protein in various brain regions, leading to both motor and non-motor symptoms [31].
A previous study utilized DTI to demonstrate degeneration of the nigrostriatal pathway in PD patients. Results showed differences in FA and MD, highlighting the value of DTI in the diagnosis of PD [31].
A study conducted on animals examined the effectiveness of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)—an extension of DTI—in detecting changes caused by the accumulation of α-synuclein (α-syn) in the white matter (specifically the cingulum) of α-syn over-expressing transgenic mice (TNWT-61). The findings suggest that DKI could serve as a highly sensitive method for identifying changes in brain tissue induced by α-synuclein accumulation, which may indicate the progression of Parkinson’s disease [31].
The cingulum, being a vulnerable area in the brain, has drawn attention in neurodegenerative research. Research has suggested that evaluating the cingulum fibers through DTI could enhance early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases.
Decreased connectivity in the cingulum tract has been found to be negatively correlated with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the early stage of PD progression [31].
NLR is a non-invasive marker of peripheral neuroinflammation and increased NLR is associated with poor cellular immunity.
According to the results of the study, degeneration of central white matter tracts in the brain occurs early in Parkinson’s disease and is primarily located in the cingulum. This degeneration may contribute to early cognitive dysfunction. Changes in the DTI measures, including increased MD [31,39,64,68] and decreased FA [50,59,65] have been detected in PD patients, with a higher number of group differences being found as the mean diffusivity increases.
Studies have suggested that MD may be more sensitive in detecting subtle white matter changes in early PD than FA, as has been found in other studies in early Alzheimer patients [87].
The pattern of decreased FA and increased MD and RD is indicative of neurodegeneration [48], which has been found in individual PD patients in the present study [33].
Three studies [34,52,70] suggest that the cingulum (where the FA of PD patients is greater than the FA of controls) is modulated by PD through a compensatory mechanism. The FA measures obtained from these brain regions may potentially be used to detect brain signal changes in an early stage of PD, possibly even before the clinical manifestation of motor symptoms [34].
The exact cause of the changes observed in the DTI of PD patients remains unknown, but it is believed to be due to variations in the diffusion ellipsoid dimensions caused by the neurodegenerative process. While FA is commonly used as a measure of white matter integrity, this interpretation should be approached with caution as it is influenced by various factors such as myelination, axon packing, membrane permeability, internal axonal structure, and tissue water content [88].
The findings of some studies have shown decreased FA and increased RD [45] in the cingulum of PD patients, while others have found increased FA and decreased AD in the same region [42]. It is hypothesized that extensive damage to white matter fibers occurs in the early stages of PD, potentially due to the aggregation of synapsins and Lewy bodies in vulnerable brain regions, resulting in atrophy, neuron loss, and demyelination of nerve fibers [89].

4.2. Motor Symptoms

In comparison to healthy controls (HC), most studies found degeneration in PD patients with motor symptoms, as indicated by decreased FA [37,79,83], increased MD [74] and a combination of decreased FA and increased MD [46]. These results suggest that FA, MD, and other DTI measures could serve as quantitative biomarkers of motor symptom severity in PD. Lower FA is typically associated with decreased WM connectivity and is considered an indication of WM microstructural abnormalities. However, it is unclear why these changes occur. Motor symptoms usually appear late in PD patients, which suggests that decreases in FA occur later in the disease than increases in MD. Some studies have found increased FA in PD patients [52,60].
The cingulum, an association fiber that connects anterior and posterior cortical regions, showed increased FA or decreased MD/RD in PD patients and was associated with better olfaction and lower motor severity [76,90].
These findings suggest that increased connectivity in these WM structures could serve as a compensatory mechanism to facilitate efficient information transfer between different regions of the brain.

4.3. Non-Motor Symptoms

It has been found in most studies that individuals with PD who have non-motor symptoms such as dementia, depression, cognitive impairment, psychosis, or apathy have significantly decreased FA values compared to HC [29,36,40,56,80,86].
The pattern of decreased FA and increased mean diffusivity (MD) has also been shown in several studies [33,47,62].
In some studies, compensation was also defined by increased FA or decreased MD [43,55,84].
Studies have consistently shown that an increase in MD (AD and RD) is associated with cell atrophy and demyelination, which may indicate extensive degeneration in advanced PD patients who present with dominant non-motor symptoms. This loss of structural organization is believed to be linked to neurodegeneration.
Depression and dementia frequently occur in PD patients, often appearing late in the disease at stage 3 or 4 of the Hoen and Yahr staging for motor involvement. They can also be present early on in the honeymoon period of PD, and have been shown to correlate with the severity of motor involvement [37]. Abnormal functioning in depression and dementia in PD patients may be due to degeneration of the microstructure in the white matter located in frontal-limbic regions. This has been observed in previous studies, and one hypothesis is that abnormalities in the frontal limbic system cause depression in PD patients [27].
Disruption of the structural integrity of white matter in the cingulum tract can be recognized as a marker to predict early PD, regardless of white matter alteration related to REM sleep disorder [83,91], depression [91,92], or olfaction dysfunction [93], which are thought to be early nonmotor symptoms of PD.
Thus, changes in the cingulum microstructure could be used to detect early stages of PD and help distinguish between PD patients without dementia and depression or those in preclinical stages.

4.4. Correlation

DTI values in the cingulum have been shown to be significantly associated with cognitive function in PD patients. This was demonstrated by a correlation between DTI values and scores from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The study results indicate that the more extensive the diffusivity abnormalities in the cingulum, the worse the cognitive performance [66].
Spearman rank order correlation analyses found significant correlations between changes in FA values in the cingulum and sociodemographically corrected Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) total scores in PD patients [29].
Additionally, lower scores on the Parkinson’s Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS) were associated with decreases in FA values in the cingulum [63]. A novel finding from one study showed a linear association between AD and the PD-CRS score in major WM tracts, without concurrent RD alterations. This suggests that extensive and progressive axonal degeneration, without evident demyelination, may be involved in cognitive impairment in PD [94,95].
The cingulum bundle has a correlation with the short Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [42].
In one study, the FA values in the left cingulum of PD patients with depression were negatively correlated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores, but no correlation was found with other disease characteristics such as age, duration, Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRS III), H&Y scale, and MMSE [36]. Another study found that the FA values negatively correlated with the UPDRS-III scores across all PD patients in the cingulum [34]. Positive correlation with disease duration and RD in the left cingulum was revealed by using Tensor-based registration (DTI-TK) and negative correlation by TBSS. The study suggested a preference for the DTI-TK based registration technique before statistical analysis [61].
On the other hand, some studies found no significant correlation between FA in the left cingulum and clinical measures [50,73].
A significant association was also found between FA of the ROI in the left cingulum and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI). Low FA values in the left cingulum were identified as the strongest predictor of sarcopenia in PD patients [53]. Positive correlations of FA and non-motor symptoms such as depressive symptoms were also found in the left cingulum in some studies [85].
Interestingly, it has been found that PD risk can be affected by cardiovascular risk factors including serum cholesterol and apo-lipoprotein levels [96].
In the early stages of PD, apo-lipoprotein A1 might predict the microstructural changes of certain white matter tracts like the cingulum [97].
The relationships between clinical presentations, MD, AD, RD, and serum nuclear DNA levels have also been demonstrated. Results suggest that poor cardiovascular autonomic status in PD patients not only directly affects the white matter microstructure but also increases the serum nuclear DNA level, further impacting the white matter microstructure [79].
Impairment of the ipsilateral posterior cingulum in PD may reflect the loss of dopaminergic inputs from the midbrain, as indicated by the statistically significant association between Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and maximum MD/RD [81].
A correlation between verbal memory and FA in the right posterior cingulum tract (PCT) was found, with greater FA in the right PCT being associated with better performance in verbal recognition memory, a core process in subsequent recognition memory [56].
The Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) scores of the apathetic PD group were negatively correlated with the FA values in the left cingulum [86].
The AD and RD values were positively associated with the UPDRS, UPDRS-III, and NMSS scores in the cingulum [45].
A negative association between RD and a positive association between FA values and the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s disease—Cognition (SCOPA-COG) scores were found in the cingulum [45].
One study found correlations between the MD parameter and declining processing speed and discrepancies in the cingulum tract [31].

5. Uncinate Fasciculus

5.1. PD

A summary of the included studies is presented in Table 3. The uncinate fasciculus interacts with the orbitofrontal cortex, assigning value to stored representations through interactions with temporal lobe-based information related to reward and punishment [98].
The most common cause of PD in autosomal recessive families is mutations in the parkin gene (PRKN) [99].
Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) using permutation analysis of linear models (PALM) has revealed elevated radial diffusivity (RD) in patients with parkin dysfunction (PRKN) compared to HCs. This finding is considered to be one of the most prominent pathological manifestations of parkin dysfunction, as it has been demonstrated by the elevated RD in multiple tests [57]. Another study [72] also confirms these results and suggests that PRKN patients with widespread increases in RD are more susceptible to widespread demyelination.
Different methods, including convolutional neural network (CNN) based methods, have shown that patients with PD exhibit increased mean diffusivity (MD) values [35,38,49,51,64]. However, some studies have reported decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) values [44,48,59,67]. MD appears to be more sensitive at detecting subtle changes in white matter in the early stages of PD compared to FA. It is due to damages to axons and neurons, as well as loss of myelin integrity in PD, that might result in decreased restriction of water molecule displacement, leading to higher MD values in PD patients [100].
A distinct pattern of neurodegeneration, characterized by low FA, high MD, low AD, and high RD, has been identified in PD patients [48]. This pattern was observed in a study by Andica et al. using TBSS [32] suggesting that PD patients are more susceptible to degeneration of the uncinate fasciculus (UF).
Christina Andica et al. conducted an analysis of white matter (WM) and gray matter in PD patients using TBSS. They found that PD patients with neurocognitive and psychiatric disorders (PD-wNCP) and PD patients without these disorders (PD-woNCP), compared to healthy controls (HCs), exhibited lower fractional anisotropy (FA), higher mean diffusivity (MD), higher radial diffusivity (RD), and higher axial diffusivity (AD), which has been described as neurodegeneration [33]. This pattern has previously been defined as neurodemyelination [48].

5.2. Motor Symptoms

The exact role of the UF in the development of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease is still not clear. Only a few studies have investigated the effect of the uncinate fasciculus on motor symptoms, with inconsistent results [28,66,71].

5.3. Non-Motor Symptoms

Parkinson’s disease, along with other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, and apathy, is characterized by non-motor symptoms that are associated with white matter (WM) pathways, including the UF and cingulum [101].
Changes in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures have been observed in the UF in PD patients with cognitive impairment, depression, and apathy. This suggests that non-motor symptoms in PD are related to the impairment of long white matter nerve fibers. It is known that multiple neurotransmitter pathways, including noradrenergic and cholinergic pathways, that project to the frontal lobe are impaired in PD patients with non-motor symptoms and other non-cognitive problems [102,103,104,105,106].
Studies have reported that patients with non-motor symptoms such as depression, dementia, and cognitive impairment exhibit more degeneration, as indicated by decreased FA [36,63,80], increased MD [26,73], and increased mean diffusivity and AD [27].
A significant reduction in white matter connectivity in UF has been found in PD patients with depressive symptoms compared to non-depressed patients. The pathophysiology of depression has been extensively studied in relation to UF, with reduced FA serving as a marker for tract microstructural alteration in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) [107]. Although Delaparte et al. [108] could not identify any significant differences between anxious and non-anxious depression, anxiety, which is frequently associated with depression, has been demonstrated to be connected to disrupted UF [108,109].
Previous research [23,110,111] has defined degeneration in the UF as low FA and high MD in patients with impulsive–compulsive behaviors and PD with neurocognitive and psychiatric symptoms [33,54].
In addition, findings of increased MD confirm neurodegeneration observed in prior studies. One study found that PD patients with impulse control behaviors (PD-ICB) had higher MD compared to HCs in the UF [35].

5.4. Correlation

Alterations in DTI parameters in PRKN patients were closely linked to both disease duration and serum levels of 9-hydroxystearate, a marker of oxidative stress. The microstructural changes in white matter seen in PRKN patients may therefore be a result of disease duration and oxidative stress. The study by Koinuma et al. [57] showed that the AD values in the UF were negatively correlated with the serum levels of 9-hydroxystearate, while MD and RD values were positively correlated with these levels.
A study found a correlation between the uncinate fasciculus and access to lexical semantic information stored in the temporal lobe, primarily in the left hemisphere. The results suggest that both the right and left UF support word production when selecting among competing alternatives is required [38].
Another study found a significant positive correlation between brain activation in the left IOFC during the verbal learning memory fMRI task and the FA of the right UF. This suggests that the greater the integrity of the UF in PD patients, the greater the functional brain activation in the left IOFC while performing the learning task. The study also revealed a significant correlation between brain activation in the left inferior orbitofrontal cortex (IOFC) during the verbal recognition functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task and verbal memory impairment, suggesting that the deficit in verbal memory performance during the fMRI paradigm could be influenced by lower brain activation in orbitofrontal cortices during the recognition memory fMRI task [56].
In one study, it was found that there was no relationship between UPDRS and motor scores with the FA of each white matter fasciculus [59].
However, in another study, the FA values were negatively correlated with the UPDRS-III scores across PD patients in the UF [34].
A decrease in total PD-CRS score was associated with decreased FA values in the UF [63]. However, no significant correlation was found between BDI scores and FA values [73].
Additionally, a significant correlation has been observed between the DTI values in the right UF and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) scores [66].
In addition, one study found a correlation between MD parameter and MoCa scores in the UF [26].
Based on several studies, the correlation between changes in white matter tracts and cognitive impairment does not seem to be influenced by region, cell type, or gender. Additionally, some studies have reported that voxel-wise correlation analysis for fractional anisotropy (FA) values did not reveal any variations based on either cell type or gender [29].
Further investigation comparing patients with and without Parkinson’s disease (PD) found no significant differences in terms of age, gender, or level of education [39]. In addition, the results of multiple linear regression analyses indicated that in people with Parkinson’s disease, white matter (WM) integrity and being male were significantly associated with muscle mass [53].
Studies conducted on various diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), have demonstrated that patients may experience changes in brain structure even before displaying symptoms of cognitive impairment [112]. Likewise, the studies we have included suggest that diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may be useful in detecting microstructural changes in Parkinson’s disease before clinical symptoms become apparent [28,29,32,38,39,46,53,58,81,112].
Several studies suggest that in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease, neural reorganization may occur as a compensatory mechanism to combat the pathology. This phenomenon could potentially explain why some individuals with Parkinson’s disease do not experience cognitive impairments [76].
DTI may not be able to detect early changes in Parkinson’s disease, but it can potentially serve as a surrogate marker by differentiating between early and late stages of the disease [45].
To confirm these findings and investigate potential links between preclinical brain changes and later development of cognitive impairment symptoms in Parkinson’s disease patients, a longitudinal study is necessary.
Earlier research has suggested that diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) could serve as a diagnostic tool to differentiate Parkinson’s disease patients from healthy individuals. By analyzing white matter fiber connections and measuring specific biomarkers, DTI may be capable of providing clinical presentations and assessing the severity of Parkinson’s disease [113,114].
As we mentioned before, FA, MD, and other DTI measures could serve as quantitative biomarkers of motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients. Despite abundant published studies of DTI markers in PD, DTI is not currently widely utilized in clinically standard MRI scanning [115].
Due to limited scanning time, conducting DTI in clinical setting may result in problems such as noise, fiber crossings, low resolution, distortion, and artifacts. Thus, the decreased quality of DTI images makes it hard to obtain precise quantitative measurements [116,117].
The quality of DTI analysis will increase with the use of advanced diffusion techniques, including high-resolution, high-field MRI, enhanced distortion corrections, and fiber crossing solutions [118,119].
However, it is crucial to create clinically useful parameters based on these cutting-edge methods. Furthermore, scanning parameters including MRI field strength, number of encoding directions, and maximum b values have a significant impact on DTI variables. DTI measurements from various MRI facilities need to be harmonized, and consistent cutoff values for these DTI parameters need to be created in order to eventually improve the individual definition and treatments of PD.

6. Conclusions

Our review provided microstructural insight into the heterogeneous PD subtypes according to their distinct clinically relevant connectivity features.
Cingulum: In this study, we found that individual PD patients had increased MD, possibly defined by degeneration in the early stages. When PD patients experience motor symptoms, FA decreases and/or MD increases, which may result in more degeneration at a later stage of the disease. PD patients with non-motor symptoms showed significant decreases in FA more towards the end of the disease, indicating that extensive degeneration occurred in their non-motor symptoms.
UF: There is a high probability of widespread demyelination and degeneration in UF for PD.
Non-motor symptoms appear lately with extensive degeneration. Cingulum compensation occurred for both motor and non-motor symptoms similarly.

Author Contributions

F.R. and M.H.A. contributed to developing the idea. F.R., Z.K., F.H., M.H.K., N.J. and B.M. contributed to the searching, extraction, and drafting of the manuscript. F.R., M.H.K., F.H. and M.H.A. contributed to editing and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We do not have any financial support for this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

M.H.A is funded by the EU-project euSNN European School of Network Neuroscience (MSCA-ITN-ETN H2020-860563).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Kalia, L.V.; Lang, A. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2015, 386, 896–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dekker, M.C.; Bonifati, V.; van Duijn, C. Parkinson’s disease: Piecing together a genetic jigsaw. Brain 2003, 126 Pt 8, 1722–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Grayson, M. Parkinson’s disease. Nature 2016, 538, S1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Moustafa, A.A.; Chakravarthy, S.; Phillips, J.R.; Gupta, A.; Keri, S.; Polner, B.; Frank, M.J.; Jahanshahi, M. Motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A unified framework. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 68, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Garcia-Ruiz, P.J.; Chaudhuri, K.; Martinez-Martin, P. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease A review…from the past. J. Neurol. Sci. 2014, 338, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zesiewicz, T.A.; Sullivan, K.; Hauser, R. Nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2006, 6, 1811–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Remy, P.; Doder, M.; Lees, A.; Turjanski, N.; Brooks, D. Depression in Parkinson’s disease: Loss of dopamine and noradrenaline innervation in the limbic system. Brain 2005, 128 Pt 6, 1314–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Todorova, P.; Jenner, P.; Chaudhuri, K.R. Non-motor Parkinson’s: Integral to motor Parkinson’s, yet often neglected. Pract. Neurol. 2014, 14, 310–322. [Google Scholar]
  9. Amanollahi, M.; Jameie, M.; Heidari, A.; Rezaei, N. The Dialogue Between Neuroinflammation and Adult Neurogenesis: Mechanisms Involved and Alterations in Neurological Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 60, 923–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marxreiter, F.; Regensburger, M.; Winkler, J. Adult neurogenesis in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 459–473. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boska, M.D.; Hasan, K.M.; Kibuule, D.; Banerjee, R.; McIntyre, E.; Nelson, J.A.; Hahn, T.; Gendelman, H.E.; Mosley, R.L. Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging detects dopaminergic neuronal degeneration in a murine model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2007, 26, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Soria, G.; Aguilar, E.; Tudela, R.; Mullol, J.; Planas, A.M.; Marin, C. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging characterization of bilateral structural changes in experimental Parkinson’s disease: A T2 relaxometry study combined with longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging and manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the 6-hydroxydopamine rat model. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 33, 1551–1560. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Huang, P.; Xu, X.; Gu, Q.; Xuan, M.; Yu, X.; Luo, W.; Zhang, M. Disrupted white matter integrity in depressed versus non-depressed Parkinson’s disease patients: A tract-based spatial statistics study. J. Neurol. Sci. 2014, 346, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, W.; Liu, J.; Skidmore, F.; Liu, Y.; Tian, J.; Li, K. White matter microstructure changes in the thalamus in Parkinson disease with depression: A diffusion tensor MR imaging study. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2010, 31, 1861–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kötter, R.; Meyer, N. The limbic system: A review of its empirical foundation. Behav. Brain Res. 1992, 52, 105–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rajmohan, V.; Mohandas, E. The limbic system. Indian J. Psychiatry 2007, 49, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schmahmann, J.D.; Smith, E.E.; Eichler, F.S.; Filley, C.M. Cerebral white matter: Neuroanatomy, clinical neurology, and neurobehavioral correlates. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1142, 266–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dalgleish, T. The emotional brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shah, A.; Jhawar, S.S.; Goel, A. Analysis of the anatomy of the Papez circuit and adjoining limbic system by fiber dissection techniques. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2012, 19, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bubb, E.J.; Metzler-Baddeley, C.; Aggleton, J.P. The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 92, 104–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pierpaoli, C.; Jezzard, P.; Basser, P.J.; Barnett, A.; Di Chiro, G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996, 201, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tak, H.J.; Kim, J.; Son, S. Developmental process of the arcuate fasciculus from infancy to adolescence: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Neural Regen. Res. 2016, 11, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Alexander, A.L.; Lee, J.E.; Lazar, M.; Field, A.S. Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. Neurotherapeutics 2007, 4, 316–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Xu, Q.; Park, Y.; Huang, X.; Hollenbeck, A.; Blair, A.; Schatzkin, A.; Chen, H. Physical activities and future risk of Parkinson disease. Neurology 2010, 75, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mole, J.P.; Subramanian, L.; Bracht, T.; Morris, H.; Metzler-Baddeley, C.; Linden, D.E. Increased fractional anisotropy in the motor tracts of Parkinson’s disease suggests compensatory neuroplasticity or selective neurodegeneration. Eur. Radiol. 2016, 26, 3327–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, B.; Fan, G.G.; Liu, H.; Wang, S. Changes in anatomical and functional connectivity of Parkinson’s disease patients according to cognitive status. Eur. J. Radiol. 2015, 84, 1318–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Z.; Liu, W.; Xiao, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yu, M.; Hu, X.; Qian, L. Abnormal white matter microstructures in Parkinson’s disease and comorbid depression: A whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurosci. Lett. 2020, 735, 135238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Holtbernd, F.; Romanzetti, S.; Oertel, W.H.; Knake, S.; Sittig, E.; Heidbreder, A.; Maier, A.; Krahe, J.; Wojtala, J.; Dogan, I. Convergent patterns of structural brain changes in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and Parkinson’s disease on behalf of the German rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder study group. Sleep 2021, 44, zsaa199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gorges, M.; Müller, H.-P.; Liepelt-Scarfone, I.; Storch, A.; Dodel, R.; Consortium, L.; Hilker-Roggendorf, R.; Berg, D.; Kunz, M.S.; Kalbe, E. Structural brain signature of cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease: DTI-based evidence from the LANDSCAPE study. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2019, 12, 1756286419843447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, J.; Chen, R.; Tong, Q.; Ma, J.; Gao, L.; Fang, J.; Zhang, D.; Chan, P.; He, H.; Wu, T. Convolutional neural network optimizes the application of diffusion kurtosis imaging in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Inform. 2021, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jalakas, M.; Palmqvist, S.; Hall, S.; Svärd, D.; Lindberg, O.; Pereira, J.B.; van Westen, D.; Hansson, O. A quick test of cognitive speed can predict development of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Andica, C.; Kamagata, K.; Hatano, T.; Saito, A.; Uchida, W.; Ogawa, T.; Takeshige-Amano, H.; Zalesky, A.; Wada, A.; Suzuki, M. Free-water imaging in white and gray matter in Parkinson’s disease. Cells 2019, 8, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Andica, C.; Kamagata, K.; Hatano, T.; Saito, Y.; Uchida, W.; Ogawa, T.; Takeshige-Amano, H.; Hagiwara, A.; Murata, S.; Oyama, G. Neurocognitive and psychiatric disorders-related axonal degeneration in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2020, 98, 936–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, N.-K.; Chou, Y.-H.; Sundman, M.; Hickey, P.; Kasoff, W.S.; Bernstein, A.; Trouard, T.P.; Lin, T.; Rapcsak, S.Z.; Sherman, S.J. Alteration of diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging measures in brain regions involved in early stages of parkinson’s disease. Brain Connect. 2018, 8, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Takeshige-Amano, H.; Hatano, T.; Kamagata, K.; Andica, C.; Uchida, W.; Abe, M.; Ogawa, T.; Shimo, Y.; Oyama, G.; Umemura, A. White matter microstructures in Parkinson’s disease with and without impulse control behaviors. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2022, 9, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, W.B.; Hu, G.; Xu, Y. Impaired long contact white matter fibers integrity is related to depression in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2018, 24, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, J.; Jiang, X.; Wu, J.; Wu, H.; Zhou, C.; Guo, T.; Bai, X.; Liu, X.; Wen, J.; Cao, Z. Gray and white matter alterations in different predominant side and type of motor symptom in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2022, 28, 1372–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Di Tella, S.; Baglio, F.; Pelizzari, L.; Cabinio, M.; Nemni, R.; Traficante, D.; Silveri, M.C. Uncinate fasciculus and word selection processing in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 2020, 146, 107504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duncan, G.W.; Firbank, M.J.; Yarnall, A.J.; Khoo, T.K.; Brooks, D.J.; Barker, R.A.; Burn, D.J.; O’Brien, J.T. Gray and white matter imaging: A biomarker for cognitive impairment in early P arkinson’s disease? Mov. Disord. 2016, 31, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lenka, A.; Ingalhalikar, M.; Shah, A.; Saini, J.; Arumugham, S.S.; Hegde, S.; George, L.; Yadav, R.; Pal, P.K. Abnormalities in the white matter tracts in patients with Parkinson disease and psychosis. Neurology 2020, 94, e1876–e1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Patriat, R.; Pisharady, P.K.; Amundsen-Huffmaster, S.; Linn-Evans, M.; Howell, M.; Chung, J.W.; Petrucci, M.N.; Videnovic, A.; Holker, E.; De Kam, J. White matter microstructure in Parkinson’s disease with and without elevated rapid eye movement sleep muscle tone. Brain Commun. 2022, 4, fcac027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Feng, Y.; Yan, W.; Wang, J.; Song, J.; Zeng, Q.; Zhao, C. Local white matter fiber clustering differentiates Parkinson’s disease diagnoses. Neuroscience 2020, 435, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nilsson, M.; Szczepankiewicz, F.; van Westen, D.; Hansson, O. Extrapolation-based references improve motion and eddy-current correction of high B-value DWI data: Application in Parkinson’s disease dementia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gou, L.; Zhang, W.; Li, C.; Shi, X.; Zhou, Z.; Zhong, W.; Chen, T.; Wu, X.; Yang, C.; Guo, D. Structural brain network alteration and its correlation with structural impairments in patients with depression in de novo and drug-naive Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Guimarães, R.P.; Campos, B.M.; de Rezende, T.J.; Piovesana, L.; Azevedo, P.C.; Amato-Filho, A.C.; Cendes, F.; D’Abreu, A. Is diffusion tensor imaging a good biomarker for early Parkinson’s disease? Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Jin, C.; Qi, S.; Teng, Y.; Li, C.; Yao, Y.; Ruan, X.; Wei, X. Integrating structural and functional interhemispheric brain connectivity of gait freezing in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 609866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Pan, A.; Xu, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Nie, K.; Huang, B. Identifying Depression in Parkinson’s Disease by Using Combined Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Support Vector Machine. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 878691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guan, X.; Huang, P.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, C.; Wei, H.; Xuan, M.; Gu, Q.; Xu, X.; Wang, N.; Yu, X. Quantitative susceptibility mapping as a biomarker for evaluating white matter alterations in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019, 13, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Canu, E.; Agosta, F.; Sarasso, E.; Volonte, M.A.; Basaia, S.; Stojkovic, T.; Stefanova, E.; Comi, G.; Falini, A.; Kostic, V.S. Brain structural and functional connectivity in P arkinson’s disease with freezing of gait. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2015, 36, 5064–5078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ji, G.J.; Ren, C.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Liu, T.; Gao, Y.; Xue, D.; Shen, L.; Cheng, W.; Zhu, C. Regional and network properties of white matter function in Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019, 40, 1253–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Guo, T.; Guan, X.; Zhou, C.; Gao, T.; Wu, J.; Song, Z.; Xuan, M.; Gu, Q.; Huang, P.; Pu, J. Clinically relevant connectivity features define three subtypes of Parkinson’s disease patients. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2020, 41, 4077–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xiao, Y.; Peters, T.M.; Khan, A.R. Characterizing white matter alterations subject to clinical laterality in drug-naïve de novo Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2021, 42, 4465–4477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, C.-Y.; Chen, H.-L.; Chen, P.-C.; Chen, Y.-S.; Chiang, P.-L.; Wang, C.-K.; Lu, C.-H.; Chen, M.-H.; Chou, K.-H.; Huang, Y.-C. Correlation between executive network integrity and sarcopenia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Imperiale, F.; Agosta, F.; Canu, E.; Markovic, V.; Inuggi, A.; Jecmenica-Lukic, M.; Tomic, A.; Copetti, M.; Basaia, S.; Kostic, V. Brain structural and functional signatures of impulsive–compulsive behaviours in Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yoo, H.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Lee, J.S.; Kang, H.; Kim, Y.K.; Song, I.C.; Lee, D.S.; Jeon, B.S. Whole-brain diffusion-tensor changes in parkinsonian patients with impulse control disorders. J. Clin. Neurol. 2015, 11, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lucas-Jiménez, O.; Diez-Cirarda, M.; Ojeda, N.; Pena, J.; Cabrera-Zubizarreta, A.; Ibarretxe-Bilbao, N. Verbal memory in parkinson’s disease: A combined DTI and fMRI study. J. Park. Dis. 2015, 5, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Koinuma, T.; Hatano, T.; Kamagata, K.; Andica, C.; Mori, A.; Ogawa, T.; Takeshige-Amano, H.; Uchida, W.; Saiki, S.; Okuzumi, A. Diffusion MRI Captures White Matter Microstructure Alterations in PRKN Disease. J. Park. Dis. 2021, 11, 1221–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Georgiopoulos, C.; Warntjes, M.; Dizdar, N.; Zachrisson, H.; Engström, M.; Haller, S.; Larsson, E.-M. Olfactory impairment in Parkinson’s disease studied with diffusion tensor and magnetization transfer imaging. J. Park. Dis. 2017, 7, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Li, X.-R.; Ren, Y.-D.; Cao, B.; Huang, X.-L. Analysis of white matter characteristics with tract-based spatial statistics according to diffusion tensor imaging in early Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 675, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Akio, H.; Togao, O.; Yamashita, K.; Somehara, R.; Kamei, R.; Baba, S. Structural changes in Parkinson’s disease: Voxel-based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging analyses based on 123I-MIBG uptake. Eur. Radiol. 2017, 27, 5073–5079. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mishra, V.R.; Sreenivasan, K.R.; Zhuang, X.; Yang, Z.; Cordes, D.; Walsh, R.R. Influence of analytic techniques on comparing DTI-derived measurements in early stage Parkinson’s disease. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Minett, T.; Su, L.; Mak, E.; Williams, G.; Firbank, M.; Lawson, R.A.; Yarnall, A.J.; Duncan, G.W.; Owen, A.M.; Khoo, T.K. Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging changes in early Parkinson’s disease: ICICLE-PD study. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 1528–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Chondrogiorgi, M.; Astrakas, L.G.; Zikou, A.K.; Weis, L.; Xydis, V.G.; Antonini, A.; Argyropoulou, M.I.; Konitsiotis, S. Multifocal alterations of white matter accompany the transition from normal cognition to dementia in Parkinson’s disease patients. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019, 13, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Koshimori, Y.; Segura, B.; Christopher, L.; Lobaugh, N.; Duff-Canning, S.; Mizrahi, R.; Hamani, C.; Lang, A.E.; Aminian, K.; Houle, S. Imaging changes associated with cognitive abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Struct. Funct. 2015, 220, 2249–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jiang, M.-f.; Shi, F.; Niu, G.-m.; Xie, S.-h.; Yu, S.-y. A novel method for evaluating brain function and microstructural changes in Parkinson’s disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 2025. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Pietracupa, S.; Suppa, A.; Upadhyay, N.; Giannì, C.; Grillea, G.; Leodori, G.; Modugno, N.; Di Biasio, F.; Zampogna, A.; Colonnese, C. Freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: Gray and white matter abnormalities. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Inguanzo, A.; Sala-Llonch, R.; Segura, B.; Erostarbe, H.; Abós, A.; Campabadal, A.; Uribe, C.; Baggio, H.C.; Compta, Y.; Marti, M. Hierarchical cluster analysis of multimodal imaging data identifies brain atrophy and cognitive patterns in Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2021, 82, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pelizzari, L.; Di Tella, S.; Laganà, M.M.; Bergsland, N.; Rossetto, F.; Nemni, R.; Baglio, F. White matter alterations in early Parkinson’s disease: Role of motor symptom lateralization. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Melzer, T.R.; Myall, D.J.; MacAskill, M.R.; Pitcher, T.L.; Livingston, L.; Watts, R.; Keenan, R.J.; Dalrymple-Alford, J.C.; Anderson, T.J. Tracking Parkinson’s disease over one year with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in a group of older patients with moderate disease. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Surova, Y.; Lampinen, B.; Nilsson, M.; Lätt, J.; Hall, S.; Widner, H.; Swedish BioFINDER Study; van Westen, D.; Hansson, O. Alterations of diffusion kurtosis and neurite density measures in deep grey matter and white matter in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ogawa, T.; Hatano, T.; Kamagata, K.; Andica, C.; Takeshige-Amano, H.; Uchida, W.; Saito, Y.; Shimo, Y.; Oyama, G.; Umemura, A. White matter alterations in Parkinson’s disease with levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Park. Relat. Disord. 2021, 90, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yu, J.; Chen, L.; Cai, G.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Hong, W.; Ye, Q. Evaluating white matter alterations in Parkinson’s disease-related parkin S/N167 mutation carriers using tract-based spatial statistics. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2022, 12, 4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Xiang, Y.; Liao, H.; Cai, S.; Zhou, B.; Wang, M.; Liu, S. Impaired white matter microstructure associated with severe depressive symptoms in patients with PD. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022, 16, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Seki, M.; Seppi, K.; Mueller, C.; Potrusil, T.; Goebel, G.; Reiter, E.; Nocker, M.; Kremser, C.; Wildauer, M.; Schocke, M. Diagnostic potential of multimodal MRI markers in atypical parkinsonian disorders. J. Park. Dis. 2019, 9, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, M.; Jiang, S.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ding, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J. Alterations of functional and structural connectivity of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. 2016, 263, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wen, M.-C.; Heng, H.S.; Lu, Z.; Xu, Z.; Chan, L.L.; Tan, E.K.; Tan, L.C. Differential white matter regional alterations in motor subtypes of early drug-naive Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 2018, 32, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wang, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, C.; Zeng, Q.; He, J.; O’Donnell, L.J.; Feng, Y. Investigation of local white matter abnormality in Parkinson’s disease by using an automatic fiber tract parcellation. Behav. Brain Res. 2020, 394, 112805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Wu, W.; Liu, R.; Pang, L.; Guan, D.; Xu, Y. Reduction of white matter integrity correlates with apathy in Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Neurosci. 2018, 128, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, M.-H.; Chen, P.-C.; Lu, C.-H.; Chen, H.-L.; Chao, Y.-P.; Li, S.-H.; Chen, Y.-W.; Lin, W.-C. Plasma DNA mediate autonomic dysfunctions and white matter injuries in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 7371403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Chen, F.; Wu, T.; Luo, Y.; Li, Z.; Guan, Q.; Meng, X.; Tao, W.; Zhang, H. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: White matter structural changes and mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0226175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lu, C.-S.; Ng, S.-H.; Weng, Y.-H.; Cheng, J.-S.; Lin, W.-Y.; Wai, Y.-Y.; Chen, Y.-L.; Wang, J.-J. Alterations of diffusion tensor MRI parameters in the brains of patients with Parkinson’s disease compared with normal brains: Possible diagnostic use. Eur. Radiol. 2016, 26, 3978–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhou, W.; Jiang, J.; Peng, W.; Zhou, X.; Du, J.; Mo, L.; Tan, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, L. Levodopa responsiveness in Parkinson’s disease patients and white matter alterations in diffusion tensor imaging: A cross-sectional tract-based spatial statistics study. NeuroReport 2021, 32, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ansari, M.; Rahmani, F.; Dolatshahi, M.; Pooyan, A.; Aarabi, M.H. Brain pathway differences between Parkinson’s disease patients with and without REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep Breath. 2017, 21, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kang, S.Y.; Bang, M.; Hong, J.Y.; Oh, J.; Kim, J.S.; Han, Y.M.; Chang, S.K.; Lee, S.A.; Yoon, U.; Shin, N.-Y. Neural and dopaminergic correlates of fatigue in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2020, 127, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Uhr, L.; Tsolaki, E.; Pouratian, N. Diffusion tensor imaging correlates of depressive symptoms in Parkinson disease. J. Comp. Neurol. 2022, 530, 1729–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, Z.; Liao, M.; Yao, Z.; Hu, B.; Xie, Y.; Zheng, W.; Hu, T.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Y. Frequency-specific functional connectivity density as an effective biomarker for adolescent generalized anxiety disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Acosta-Cabronero, J.; Williams, G.B.; Pengas, G.; Nestor, P.J. Absolute diffusivities define the landscape of white matter degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2010, 133, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Curran, K.M.; Emsell, L.; Leemans, A. Quantitative DTI measures. Diffus. Tensor Imaging A Pract. Handb. 2016, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chu, Y.; Morfini, G.A.; Langhamer, L.B.; He, Y.; Brady, S.T.; Kordower, J.H. Alterations in axonal transport motor proteins in sporadic and experimental Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2012, 135 Pt 7, 2058–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Sanjari Moghaddam, H.; Dolatshahi, M.; Salardini, E.; Aarabi, M.H. Association of olfaction dysfunction with brain microstructure in prodromal Parkinson disease. Neurol. Sci. 2019, 40, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ghazi Sherbaf, F.; Rostam Abadi, Y.; Mojtahed Zadeh, M.; Ashraf-Ganjouei, A.; Sanjari Moghaddam, H.; Aarabi, M.H. Microstructural changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease comorbid with REM sleep behaviour disorder and depressive symptoms. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ghazi Sherbaf, F.; Rahmani, F.; Jooyandeh, S.M.; Aarabi, M.H. Microstructural changes in patients with Parkinson disease and REM sleep behavior disorder: Depressive symptoms versus non-depressed. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2018, 118, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sobhani, S.; Rahmani, F.; Aarabi, M.H.; Sadr, A.V. Exploring white matter microstructure and olfaction dysfunction in early parkinson disease: Diffusion MRI reveals new insight. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019, 13, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Song, S.-K.; Sun, S.-W.; Ju, W.-K.; Lin, S.-J.; Cross, A.H.; Neufeld, A.H. Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia. Neuroimage 2003, 20, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sun, S.-W.; Song, S.-K.; Harms, M.P.; Lin, S.-J.; Holtzman, D.M.; Merchant, K.M.; Kotyk, J.J. Detection of age-dependent brain injury in a mouse model of brain amyloidosis associated with Alzheimer’s disease using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Exp. Neurol. 2005, 191, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Gudala, K.; Bansal, D.; Muthyala, H. Role of serum cholesterol in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis of evidence. J. Park. Dis. 2013, 3, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rahmani, F.; Aarabi, M.H. Does apolipoprotein A1 predict microstructural changes in subgenual cingulum in early Parkinson? J. Neurol. 2017, 264, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Von Der Heide, R.J.; Skipper, L.M.; Klobusicky, E.; Olson, I.R. Dissecting the uncinate fasciculus: Disorders, controversies and a hypothesis. Brain 2013, 136, 1692–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Kitada, T.; Asakawa, S.; Hattori, N.; Matsumine, H.; Yamamura, Y.; Minoshima, S.; Yokochi, M.; Mizuno, Y.; Shimizu, N. Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism. Nature 1998, 392, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Concha, L. A macroscopic view of microstructure: Using diffusion-weighted images to infer damage, repair, and plasticity of white matter. Neuroscience 2014, 276, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tighe, S.K.; Oishi, K.; Mori, S.; Smith, G.S.; Albert, M.; Lyketsos, C.G.; Mielke, M.M. Diffusion tensor imaging of neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s dementia. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2012, 24, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Nagasaka, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Takashima, I. Topographical projections from the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (Meynert) to the frontal cortex: A voltage-sensitive dye imaging study in rats. Brain Stimul. 2017, 10, 977–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Biundo, R.; Weis, L.; Antonini, A. Cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease: The complex picture. Npj Park. Dis. 2016, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Schapira, A.H.; Chaudhuri, K.; Jenner, P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Delaville, C.; Deurwaerdère, P.D.; Benazzouz, A. Noradrenaline and Parkinson’s disease. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2011, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Perez-Lloret, S.; Barrantes, F.J. Deficits in cholinergic neurotransmission and their clinical correlates in Parkinson’s disease. Npj Park. Dis. 2016, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. De Kwaasteniet, B.; Ruhe, E.; Caan, M.; Rive, M.; Olabarriaga, S.; Groefsema, M.; Heesink, L.; van Wingen, G.; Denys, D. Relation between structural and functional connectivity in major depressive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 74, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Delaparte, L.; Yeh, F.-C.; Adams, P.; Malchow, A.; Trivedi, M.H.; Oquendo, M.A.; Deckersbach, T.; Ogden, T.; Pizzagalli, D.A.; Fava, M. A comparison of structural connectivity in anxious depression versus non-anxious depression. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2017, 89, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hettema, J.M.; Kettenmann, B.; Ahluwalia, V.; McCarthy, C.; Kates, W.R.; Schmitt, J.E.; Silberg, J.L.; Neale, M.C.; Kendler, K.S.; Fatouros, P. Pilot multimodal twin imaging study of generalized anxiety disorder. Depress. Anxiety 2012, 29, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Feldman, H.M.; Yeatman, J.D.; Lee, E.S.; Barde, L.H.; Gaman-Bean, S. Diffusion tensor imaging: A review for pediatric researchers and clinicians. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. JDBP 2010, 31, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Alexander, A.L.; Hurley, S.A.; Samsonov, A.A.; Adluru, N.; Hosseinbor, A.P.; Mossahebi, P.; Tromp, D.P.; Zakszewski, E.; Field, A.S. Characterization of cerebral white matter properties using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging stains. Brain Connect. 2011, 1, 423–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Avila Villanueva, M.; Marcos Dolado, A.; Gomez Ramirez, J.; Fernandez-Blazquez, M.A. Brain structural and functional changes in cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 886619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Cochrane, C.J.; Ebmeier, K.P. Diffusion tensor imaging in parkinsonian syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2013, 80, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Ofori, E.; Pasternak, O.; Planetta, P.J.; Li, H.; Burciu, R.G.; Snyder, A.F.; Lai, S.; Okun, M.S.; Vaillancourt, D.E. Longitudinal changes in free-water within the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2015, 138, 2322–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, Y. and M.A. Burock, Diffusion tensor imaging in Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonian syndrome: A systematic review. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 531993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bergamino, M.; Keeling, E.G.; Mishra, V.R.; Stokes, A.M.; Walsh, R.R. Assessing white matter pathology in early-stage Parkinson disease using diffusion MRI: A systematic review. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Atkinson-Clement, C.; Pinto, S.; Eusebio, A.; Coulon, O. Diffusion tensor imaging in Parkinson’s disease: Review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage Clin. 2017, 16, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Tuch, D.S.; Reese, T.G.; Wiegell, M.R.; Makris, N.; Belliveau, J.W.; Wedeen, V.J. High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity. Magn. Reson. Med. Off. J. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 48, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wedeen, V.J.; Wang, R.; Schmahmann, J.D.; Benner, T.; Tseng, W.-Y.I.; Dai, G.; Pandya, D.; Hagmann, P.; D’Arceuil, H.; de Crespigny, A.J. Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers. Neuroimage 2008, 41, 1267–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Tractography of cingulum (blue) and uncinate fasciculus (purple).
Figure 1. Tractography of cingulum (blue) and uncinate fasciculus (purple).
Biology 12 00475 g001
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram for DTI of the cingulum and uncinate fasciculus in PD. *, studies which had investigated diseases other than PD or had used imaging methods other than DTI were excluded.
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram for DTI of the cingulum and uncinate fasciculus in PD. *, studies which had investigated diseases other than PD or had used imaging methods other than DTI were excluded.
Biology 12 00475 g002
Table 1. An overview of the demographic of literature regarding studies with significant microstructural changes of Cingulum and Uncinate Fasciculus in association with PD symptoms.
Table 1. An overview of the demographic of literature regarding studies with significant microstructural changes of Cingulum and Uncinate Fasciculus in association with PD symptoms.
Demographic Features
StudyGroups StudiedNumber of Participants (Male)Mean Age ± SD (Years) or RangeDisease Duration ± SD (Years) or Range
Boyu Chen et al., 2015 [26]HC
PD-Cu
PDD
21 (11)
19 (10)
11 (6)
61.10 ± 8.336
59.47 ± 8.771
64.09 ± 11.353

3.21 ± 1.960
3.64 ± 2.693
Zonghong Li et al., 2020 [27]HC
non-depressed PD
depressed PD
91 (40)
43 (24)
30 (13)
57.67 ± 5.27
58.09 ± 6.52
59.23 ± 7.10

6.28 ± 3.38
5.46 ± 4.25
Florian Holtbernd et al., 2019 [28]PD
HC
RBD
29 (21)
56 (42)
30 (29)
63.5 ± 8.3
62.9 ± 11.0
66.8 ± 9.1
80.9 ± 85.7 (months)
_
121.0 ± 162.4
Martin Gorges et al., 2019 [29]HC
PD
72 (39)
134 (98)
65 ± 7
67 ± 8
9 ± 4
9 ± 5
Junyan Sun et al., 2021 [30]PD
HC
68 (36)
77 (30)
58.94 (8.969)
59.58 (8.537)
_
4 (0.5–20)
Mattis Jalakas et al., 2019 [31]HC
PD
PDD
51 (0.56) (1 = female)
175 (0.37)
30 (0.3)
65 (8.5)
65 (10)
72.5 (6.6)
NA
5.1 (4.9)
14 (6.8)
Christina Andica et al., 2019 [32]HC
PD
20 (12)
20 (11)
67.15 1.18
65.05 10.9

6.95 3.93
Christina Andica et al., 2020 [33]HC
PD-woNCP
PD-wNCP
25 (10)
19 (6)
20 (12)
67.88 ± 2.11
67.21 ± 8.16
70.15 ± 4.03

9.84 ± 6.21
9.95 ± 7.69
Nan-Kuei Chen et al., 2018 [34]PD
HC
7 (0)
15 (0)
64.03–10.30
58.03–9.28
62.9–43.6 (months)
Haruka Takeshige-Amano et al., 2022 [35]HC
PD-ICB
PD-nICB

20 (9)
19 (10)
18 (5)
66.75 1.07
67.11 7.00
66.28 5.03

14.3 7.75
10.2 4.82
Jia-Yong Wu et al., 2017 [36]PDD
PDnD
31 (18)
37 (23)
58.8 ± 8.67
59.1 ± 11.4
3.23 ± 3.04
2.40 ± 2.53
Jingwen Chen et al., 2022 [37]HC
LAR
LTD
RAR
RTD
50 (28)
38 (17)
32 (16)
43 (25)
48 (34)
59.2 ± 6.3
59.4 ± 10.3
60.4 ± 8.9
57.9 ± 10.6
59.3 ± 9.7

4.5 ± 4.5
3.9 ± 3.1
3.4 ± 3.2
4.5 ± 4.2
Sonia Di Tella et al., 2020 [38]HC
PD
17 (9)
19 (10)
64.08 (12.71)
67.75 (13.25)
NA
29.00 (38.00) (months)
Gordon W. Duncan et al., 2015 [39]HC
PD
50 (29)
125 (85)
65.8 ± 8.0
66.0 ± 10.5
6.15 (4.66)
Abhishek Lenka et al., 2020 [40]PD-NP
PD-P
48 (41)
42 (35)
57.9 ± 7.0
58.5 ± 7.8
5.7 ± 2.4
6.5 ± 3.2
Rémi Patriat et al., 2022 [41]HC
PD−RSWA
PD + RSWA
21 (10)
20 (14)
18 (9)
61.3 + 8.0
63.0 + 8.6
65.8 + 4.8

2.1 + 1.5
2.8 + 2.2
Yuanjing Feng et al., 2020 [42]SWEDD
PD
HC
42 (27)
50 (35)
50 (35)
60.7 ± 9:4
60.3 ± 8:9
60.6 ± 10:3
6.9 ± 8:0
6.7 ± 7:3
NA
Markus Nilsson et al., 2015 [43]PDD
HC
11 (NA)
27 (NA)
74 ± 7
70 ± 4
NA
Lubin Gou et al., 2018 [44]d-PD
nd-PD
HC
28 (17)
56 (36)
37 (21)
61.43 ± 10.06
63.97 ± 8.31
60.35 ± 11.70
NA
Rachel P. Guimarães et al., 2018 [45]All PD
MPD
MoPD
SPD
HC
97
24
60
13
137 (83)
60.93 ± 9.8
61.66 ± 9.6
60.30 ± 10.69
61.96 ± 8.4
58 ± 9.39
7.8 ± 6.43
4.15 ± 4.08
8.74 ± 6.62
12.14 ± 5.31
Chaoyang Jin et al., 2021 [46]HC
PD FOG +
PD FOG–
24 (15)
24 (11)
37 (18)
62.5 ± 3.8
65.5 ± 6.1
64.1 ± 8.2

6.00 ± 5.25
3.01 ± 3.21
Yunjun Yang et al., 2022 [47]Dpd
ndPD
HC
37 (19)
35 (21)
25 (9)
60.73 ± 11.22
62.40 ± 11.10
57.08 ± 7.93
5.01 ± 3.01
3.57 ± 3.65
Xiaojun Guan et al., 2018 [48]HC
PD
46 (21)
65 (32)
57.8 ± 9.4
55.5 ± 9.5

4.7 ± 3.9
Elisa Canu et al., 2015 [49]PD-FoG
HC
23
35
66.9± 8.0
67.7± 7.6
≥5 years
Gong-Jun Ji et al., 2019 [50]PD
HC
57 (29)
52 (20)
59.5 1.21
60.6 1.22
4.6 0.61
Tao Guo et al., 2020 [51]S-depression PD
S-motor PD
mild PD
HC
53 (29)
37 (26)
44 (24)
77 (33)
60.89 ± 8.68
63.34 ± 10.05
59.38 ± 8.30
60.22 ± 7.40
3.86 ± 4.14
4.86 ± 3.03
3.77 ± 3.58
-
Yiming Xiao et al., 2021 [52]Left-dominant PD
Right-dominant PD
PD
HC
62 (34)
79 (56)
141 (90)
62 (22)
59.8 ± 8.8
63.2 ± 8.8
61.7 ± 8.9
61.4 ± 9.8
NA
Chih-Ying Lee et al., 2019 [53]NC
PDNSa
PDSa
19 (10)
31 (9)
21 (12)
60.3 7.6
60.3 9.8
63.7 11.6

2.4 2.4
1.9 2.0
F Imperiale et al., 2017 [54]PD-ICB
PD no-ICB
HC
35 (30)
50 (36)
50 (35)
62.0 ± 10.4
61.5 ± 8.9
59.0 ± 12.4
9.5 ± 5.2
9.0 ± 6.1
NA
Hye Bin Yoo et al., 2015 [55]PD-ICD
PD-nonICD
HC
10 (7)
9 (6)
18 (10)
54.5 ± 6.2
59.6 ± 8.6
54.4 ± 6.5
10.2 ± 7.3
10.6 ± 3.9
Olaia Lucas-Jim’enez et al., 2015 [56]PD
HC
37 (22)
15 (11)
67.97 (6.17)
65.07 (7.01)
6.96 (5.61)
Takahiro Koinumaa 2021 [57]HC
PARK2
15 (9)
9 (4)
55.2 (± 20.7)
58.3 (±14.1)
_
27.5 (±11.9) months
Charalampos Georgiopoulos et al., 2017 [58]PD
HC
22 (12)
13
68 (95% CI 67 and 70)
68 (95% CI 65 and 70)
7 (95% CI 5 and 9)
Xiang-Rong Li et al., 2018 [59]PD
HC
31
22
60.5 ± 9.3
59.7 ± 8.6
NA
Kazufumi Kikuchi et al., 2017 [60]PD-MIBGH
PD-MIBGL
12
12
66.8 ± 4.9
67.4 ± 6.1
1 ± 1.3
2 ± 1.9
Virendra R. Mishra et al., 2019 [61]HC
PD
44 (29)
81 (52)
61 ± 10.79
61.35 ± 9.93
NA
11.46 ± 13.85
Thais Minett et al., 2018 [62]PD-NC
PD-MCI
HC
93
27
48
64.3 ± 10.8
70.5 ± 8.1
66.0 ± 7.9
6.4 ± 0.5
5.6 ± 0.7
-
Maria Chondrogiorgi et al., 2019 [63]PD-CTRL
PDD

40 (31)
21 (16)
68.4 (6)
70.9 (5.7)
5.7 (4.8)
7.9 (6.8)
Yuko Koshimori et al., 2015 [64]HC
PD
26 (13)
15 (4)
70.5 ± 5.6
67.13 ± 5.1
6.7 (4.2)
Ming-fang Jiang et al., 2015 [65]PD
HC
31 (16)
34 (18)
69.4 ± 8.0
69.3 ± 8.0
< 3 years in 15 cases, 3–5
years in 9 cases, and 5–10 years in 7 cases
-
Sara Pietracupa et al., 2017 [66]PD-FOG
PD-NFOG
HC
21 (16)
16 (13)
19
66.3 ± 10.72
69,7 ± 11.1
66.74 ± 7.68
11 ± 6.3
9.5 ± 6.2
-
A. Inguanzo et al., 2020 [67]HC
PD1
PD2
PD3
33 (18)
15 (13)
21 (14)
26 (19)
66 (15)
75 (14)
68 (9)
58.5 (11)
NA
7 (7.5)
9 (9)
7 (5.5)
Laura Pelizzari et al., 2019 [68]LPD
RPD
HC
9 (4)
12 (7)
17 (9)
68.3 (57.1–73.3)
70.2 (61–73.8)
64.1 (57.3–68.3)
4 (1.5–6)
2 (1–3.5)
Tracy R. Melzer et al., 2015 [69]HC
PD
23 (16)
23 (17)
70.6 ± 6.8
69.5 ± 6.4
_
5.6 ± 4.3
Yulia Surova 2016 [70]HC
PD
44 (19)
105 (44)
66 ± 8
66 ± 11
_
5 ± 4
Takashi Ogawa 2021 [71]HCs
PD-nLID
PD-LID
23 (9)
26 (11)
25 (10)
67.0 ± 1.2
67.2 ± 4.7
66.8 ± 7.4
_
7.3 ± 3.9
13.8 ± 7.1
Jinqiu Yu et al., 2022 [72]HC
PD
G/G
G/A
28 (12)
26 (14)
27 (14)
12 (12)
62.3 ± 6
65.5 ± 6.8
63.9 ± 6.6
63.8 ± 6.6
NA
Qin Shen et al., 2021 [73]ndPD
mdPD
sdPD
30 (15)
22 (10)
15 (6)
56.9 ± 10.6
56.4 ± 8.0
57.8 ± 6.7
2.2 ± 1.2
2.3 ± 1.3
2.5 ± 1.5
Morinobu Seki et al., 2019 [74]PSP
MSA-P
PD
HC
18 (14)
16 (8)
16 (9)
21 (8)
67.1 ± 6.5
63.9 ± 7.1
65.2 ± 5.3
62.3 ± 6.8
2.3 ± 1.5
1.9 ± 1.6
3.2 ± 2.0
_
Min Wang et al., 2016 [75]PD-FOG
PD-nFOG
HC
14 (9)
16 (10)
16 (8)
72.36 ± 6.15
68.88 ± 6.00
68.56 ± 2.56
3.29 ± 1.65
3.70 ± 2.94
_
Ming-Ching Wen et al., 2018 [76]HC
TD
PIGD
61 (41)
52 (32)
13 (10)
60.19 ± 10.80
60.46 ± 9.57
66.66 ± 10.17
7.52 ± 8.00
6.54 ± 6.78
-
Jingqiang Wang et al., 2020 [77]PD
HC
30 (19)
28 (17)
59.3 ± 9.0
59.9 ± 9.7
NA
Yang Zhang et al., 2017 [78]Apathy
Non-apathy
18 (17)
21 (14)
62.28 ± 13.02
60.24 ± 10.32
4.06 ± 2.34
3.74 ± 2.50
Meng-Hsiang Chen et al., 2017 [79]PD
HC
29 (20)
26 (19)
61.51 ± 8.27
60.11 ± 7.77
NA
Fuyong Chen et al., 2019 [80]HC
PD-CN
PD-aMCI
20 (80%)
19 (78.9%)
17 (88.2%)
59.5 ± 6.2
61.3 ± 6.9
64.9 ± 5.9
_
5.9 ± 3.4
7.6 ± 4.9
Elisa Canu et al., 2015 [49]PD-punding
PD no-ICB
HC
21 (18)
28 (19)
28 (19)
63.8 ± 8.8
63.6 ± 6.5
61.9 ± 8.3
9.4 ± 5.4
9.7 ± 5.4
_
Chin-Song Lu et al., 2016 [81]PD
HC
126 (68)
91 (43)
62.0 ±7.6
59.8 ±7.2
8.2 ±6.1
_
Wen Zhou et al., 2021 [82]Responsive group
Irresponsive group
15 (7)
11 (6)
67.13 ± 8.52
68.91 ± 7.08
3.93 ± 3.10
2.82 ± 2.75
Mina Ansari et al., 2016 [83]PD-RBD
PD-non-RBD
23 (18)
31 (20)
59.43 ± 10.97
60.64 ± 8.65
7.95 ± 8.76 months
7.32 ± 8.19 months
Suk Yun Kang et al., 2019 [84]Without fatigue
With fatigue
23 (10)
9 (8)
70.0 ± 8.4
63.6 ± 12.5
22.7 ± 28.5 months
27.6 ± 2.2 months
Lauren Uhr et al., 2022 [85]PD31 (24)64.5 (5.80)8.48 (3.38)
Jilu Princy Mole et al., 2016 [25]PD
HC
24 (20)
26 (17)
63.42 ± 10.82
64.88 ± 8.06
NA
Table 2. An overview of the literature regarding studies with significant microstructural changes of Cingulum in association with PD symptoms. (NA is a written abbreviation for not applicable.)
Table 2. An overview of the literature regarding studies with significant microstructural changes of Cingulum in association with PD symptoms. (NA is a written abbreviation for not applicable.)
Between-Group Findings Symptomatology Correlations with DTI Metrics Complementary Information of Participants
StudyFAMDRD or AD increasesAdditional imaging resultsApplied testsSignificant associationsDrug exposureGroup matches
Zonghong Li et al., 2020 [27]No significant differencesNon-depressed
PD, depressed PD > HC in left uncinate fasciculus
RD: No significant differences
AD: non-depressed PD,
depressed PD > HC in right hippocampal part of cingulum and bilateral uncinate fasciculus
NAHDRS, MMSE, UPDRS-III, H&YNANAAge, sex, years of education or
MMSE
Martin Gorges et al., 2019 [29]PD < HC
in cingulum
NANANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSE, PANDA, CERADSignificant correlations between
cognitive state-dependent regional FA changes
and the sociodemographically corrected CERAD
total score in cingulum
ON
Mattis Jalakas et al., 2019 [31]NANANANAUPDRS-III, MMSECorrelations between declining processing speed and discrepancies
in the cingulum tract using the mean diffusivity, MD, parameter
ON
Christina Andica et al., 2019 [32]HC > PD in UF and cingulum hippocampusHC < PD in UF
AD: HC < PD in UF
RD: HC < PD in UF and cingulum hippocampus
NAMDS-UPDRS, H&YNAON
Christina Andica et al., 2020 [33]HC > PD-woNCP in UF and right cingulum hippocampus
HC > PD-wNCP
in cingulum hippocampus and UF

HC < PD-woNCP in UF
HC < PD-wNCPs in
right cingulum hippocampus and UF

RD: HC < PD-woNCP in UF and cingulum hippocampus
HC < PD-wNCP in UF and cingulum hippocampus
AD: HC < PD-wNCP in UF
TOI:
FA:PD-woNCP < HC
PD-wNCP < HC
MD: PD-woNCP > HC
PD-wNCP > HC
RD: PD-woNCP > HC
PD-wNCP > HC
H&Y, UPDRS I, UPDRS-III, TOINAONAge
and sex-matched HCs
Nan-Kuei Chen et al., 2018 [34]PD > HC
in Cingulum (hippocampus)
NANANAMMSE, UPDRS-III, H&YThe FA values negatively
correlated with the UPDRS-III scores across PD patients in Cingulum (hippocampus) and UF
NA
Haruka Takeshige-Amano et al., 2022 [35]NAPD-ICB > HC in uncinate fasciculus
PD-nICB > PD-ICB in cingulum and UF
NANAH&Y, UPDRS I, UPDRS-IIINAON
Jia-Yong Wu et al., 2017 [36]PDD < PDnD in UF and cingulumNANANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSE, HDRSFA values in the left cingulum
and left superior longitudinal fasciculus
of the PDD group were negatively correlated
with HDRS scores, but no correlation was found with other
disease characteristics including age, duration, UPDRS-III,
H-Y scale, MMSE
NAAge, age of onset,
disease duration, sex
Jingwen Chen et al., 2022 [37]LAR, LTD < HC
No significant
differences
between RAR, RTD and HC
in cingulum bundle
No significant differencesNANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSENAONAge,
disease duration, sex, Levodopa equivalent daily dos
Gordon W. Duncan et al., 2015 [39]No significant differencePD > HC in cingulumNANAMDS-UPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSE, MoCANAONAge, gender, and
education
Abhishek Lenka et al., 2020 [40]PD-P < PD-NP in cingulumNo significant differenceNo significant differenceNAMoCA, HAMD, HAMA, H&Y, FAB, UPDRS-III,
Corsi block-tapping test, RAVLT, CFT, TMT-B, Stroop effect
NAONAge, sex, age of onset,
disease duration
Rémi Patriat et al., 2022 [41]NAPD−RSWA < HC in cingulumRD: PD−RSWA < HC in cingulumNAMDS-UPDRS-III, H&Y, MoCANAONSex,
age, education and MoCA, age at diagnosis, years since diagnosis, H&Y AND total MDS UDRS III score
Yuanjing Feng et al., 2020 [42]SWEDD < PD, HC
PD > HC
in cingulum bundle
NAAD: SWEDD > PD, HC
in cingulum bundle
NAUPDRS-III, MoCANANA
Markus Nilsson et al., 2015 [43]PDD > HC in cingulumNANANANANANA
Rachel P. Guimarães et al., 2018 [45]All PD < HC in cingulumNARD: ALL PD > HC in cingulum
SPD > HC, MPD, MoPD in cingulum
ROI: no FA difference between groups.
AD and RD were higher in SPD when compared to HC, MPD and MoPD
UPDRS, UPDRS-PartIII, H&Y, SCOPA, SCOPA, NMSSPositive association between SCOPA-COG scores
and FA values, and a negative association with RD and UPDRS, UPDRS-III and NMSS, were positively associated with AD and RD values in cingulum
ONAge and sex
Chaoyang Jin et al., 2021 [46]PD FOG+ < HC
PD FOG+ < PD FOG– in the cingulum
PD FOG– > HC
in cingulum
NANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, FOGQ, MMSE,
MoCA, TUG, HDRS NA, HARS
NANA
Yunjun Yang et al., 2022 [47]
dPD < ndPD
in right
cingulum (cingulate gyrus), left cingulum hippocampus
dPD > ndPD in right
cingulum (cingulate gyrus)
NANAH&Y, UPDRS- III, HAM-D, HAMA, MMSE, MoCANANA
Xiaojun Guan et al., 2018 [48]PD < HC only in
the right UF
PD > HC in the
left cingulum
RD: PD > HC
AD: PD < HC
NAUPDRS, H&Y, MMSEIn the right cingulate gyrus,
significant correlation of increased
MMS with disease duration
NAAge and sex
Elisa Canu et al., 2015 [49]PD-FoG < HC in cingulumPD-FoG > HC
in cingulum
NANAFOGQ, UPDRS-IIINAONAge, sex, education
Gong-Jun Ji et al., 2019 [50]PD < HC
in the left cingulum
NANANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSE, MoCANo significant
correlation was found between FA in the left cingulum and clinical measures
51 of PD patients OFF, 6 ONAge, sex, and
education-matched HCs
Yiming Xiao et al., 2021 [52]PD > HC in cingulum
Right dominant PD > Left dominant PD in cingulum
NANANAH&Y, UPDRS, GDS, RBDSQNANA
Chih-Ying Lee et al., 2019 [53]PDSa < PDNsa in
bilateral cingulum
PDSa > PDNsa in
bilateral cingulum
RD: PDSa > PDNsa in
bilateral cingulum
NAUPDRS, H&Y, MMSE, S&E, ASMISignificantly associations between ASMI and FA of the ROI in the left cingulumONAge, gender,
height, MMSE
Hye Bin Yoo et al., 2015 [55]PD-ICD > PD-nonICD in
right dorsal and posterior cingula
NANANAMMSE, UDPRS, H&YNAONAge, sex, MMSE
score, GDS score,
disease duration,
total daily LED,
UPDRS, HY stage
Olaia Lucas-Jim´enez et al., 2015 [56]PD < HC in right ACT
PD > HC in left PCT
NANANAUDPRS, H&YIn correlations between verbal memory and FA of the right PCT, FA correlated positively
with correct rejections and
negatively with false positives in HC group
between brain activation in the left IOFC during the verbal learning memory fMRI task and FA of the
right UF
ON
Xiang-Rong Li et al., 2018 [59]PD < HC in left unciform fasciculus, right
cingulum
NANANAH&Y, UPDRS, MMSEUPDRS and motor score had no relationship with the
FA of each white matter fasciculus
OFF
Virendra R. Mishra et al., 2019 [61]No significant
differences
No significant
differences
No significant
differences
NAMDS-UPDRS-III, MoCA, H&YTBSS:Negative correlation with
disease duration and bilateral CGC
DTI-TK: Positive correlation with
disease duration and RD in left CGC
NASex, age, years of education,
and handedness
and MoCA
Thais Minett et al., 2018 [62]PDMCI < HC in cingulaPD-MCI and PD-N > HC
in cingula
NANAUPDRS-III, H&YNAONAge, proportion of
WML, duration
of PD, levodopa
equivalent dose
Maria Chondrogiorgi et al., 2019 [63]PDD < PD-CTRL in cingulum (cingulate
gyrus) and uncinate fasciculus
No significant
differences
No significant
differences

NA
H&Y, MMSE, HAM-D, PD-CRSLower total PD-CRS score was associated with FA decreases incingulum (cingulate gyrus), cingulum (hippocampus) and uncinate fasciculusONSex,
years of education
Yuko Koshimori et al., 2015 [64]NAPD > HC in cingulum and
uncinate fasciculus
NANAMoCA, UPDRS-III,NAONAge, sex, education,
BDI, and handedness
Ming-fang Jiang et al., 2015 [65]PD < HC in cingulum
bundle
NANANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MoCA, ADL, HAMDFA values in the white matter tracts showed no correlation with UPDRSIII scoresONAge and sex
Sara Pietracupa et al., 2017 [66]NAHC < PD-FOG, PD-NFOG
PD-FOG > PD-NFOG
in UF
HC, PD-FOG < PD-NFOG
HC < PD-FOG in Cingulum angular bundle
RD: HC < PD-FOG, PD-NFOG
PD-FOG < PD-NFOG
in UF
HC, PD-FOG < PD-NFOG
HC < PD-FOG in Cingulum angular bundle
AD: HC, PD-FOG < PD-NFOG
HC > PD-FOG in UF
NAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSE, FAB, HAM-DDTI values in the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum
(both cingulate gyrus and angular bundles) bilaterally
significantly correlated with the cognitive scores, as assessed
by the MMSE
DTI values in the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum
(angular bundle and cingulate gyrus)
bilaterally significantly correlated with frontal abilities, as
indicated by the FAB scores
significant correlation between DTI values in the right uncinate fasciculus and the HAM-D scores
ON & OFFAge and sex
Laura Pelizzari et al., 2019 [68]No significant differencesRPD > HC in right cingulum
LPD > HC
RPD > LPD
No significant differencesNAMDS-UPDRS-III, H&Y, MoCANAON
Tracy R. Melzer et al., 2015 [69]No significant differencesNo significant differencesNo significant differencesTime effects: FA showed
widespread reduction in cingulum bundles, MD, and RD exhibited significant, yet more restricted
increases
MDS-UPDRS-IIINAONAge, education, sex
Yulia Surova 2016 [70]PD > HC in
Cingulum hippocampus
NANANAUPDRS, H&Y, MMSE, AQT, ADAS-CogNANA
Morinobu Seki et al., 2019 [74]NAPD, HC > MSA-P
in adjacent cingulum
NANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSENANASex,
age, and disease duration
Min Wang et al., 2016 [75]PD-FOG < HC in left cingulumPD-FOG > HC in left cingulumNANAFOGQ, MMSE, UPDRS-IIINAONAge, sex, education
PD-FOG and PDnFOG:
Disease duration, UPDRS-III, LEDD
Ming-Ching Wen et al., 2018 [76]TD > HC in right cingulum
TD > PIGD in right and left cingulum
no significant between HC and PIGD
NARD: TD < HC in right cingulum, PIGD > TD in UF
AD: PIGD > HC in UF
NAUDPRS, H&Y, MOCA, GDS,
Cardiovascular burden, Head motion
NAOFFAge, sex, education,
handedness,
dominant side, PD
duration/H&Y scale,
cardiovascular burden,
head motion
Jingqiang Wang et al., 2020 [77]Significant
Difference in UF
NAAD: Significant
Difference in cingulum bundle
MoCA, UPDRS-III, GDSCingulum bundle have correlation with GDSNA
Yang Zhang et al., 2017 [78]apathy group < Non-apathy
in left cingulum
NANANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSE, BDI-IIFA and LARS scores were negatively correlated
in left cingulum
ONAge, sex, disease duration, LEDD,
UPDRS-III, MMSE
Meng-Hsiang Chen et al., 2017 [79]PD < HC in left
cingulum
NANANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, S&EMD values in
the left cingulum were positively correlated with baroreflex
sensitivity and negatively correlated with serumnuclearDNA
simultaneously
AD values in the left
cingulum were positively correlated with the serum nuclear
DNA level
RD values in the
left cingulum were simultaneously positively correlated with
baroreflex sensitivity and negatively correlated with serum
nuclear DNA
NAAge and sex
Fuyong Chen et al., 2019 [80]PD-CN > PD-aMCI in cingulum (cingulate gyrus) in the bilateral hemispheresNANANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSE, RBANSNAON
Chin-Song Lu et al., 2016 [81]NANANANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSE, ADLA statistically
significant association between ADL and maximum
MD/RD in the ipsilateral posterior cingulum
OFF
Wen Zhou et al., 2021 [82]Irresponsive group < Responsive group in
bilateral cingulum
NANANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSENAONParkinson’s disease duration, age, sex
Mina Ansari et al., 2016 [83]PD-RBD < PD-non-RBD in
cingulum
NANANARBD, MOCA, GDS, UPDRS-III, H&Y, ESS, LNSNANAAge, sex
Suk Yun Kang et al., 2019 [84]PD < PD with fatigue in right cingulum, UFPD > PD with fatigue in right cingulumRD: PD > PD with fatigue in UF, cingulumNAK-MMSE, MoCA, BDI, UPDRS, H&Y, FSSNANA
Lauren Uhr et al., 2022 [85]NANANANAUPDRSPositive ROI-based correlations of FA and depressive symptoms in left cingulum (hippocampus)ON
Table 3. An overview of the literature regarding studies with significant microstructural changes in the uncinate fasciculus in association with PD symptoms. (NA is a written abbreviation for not applicable.)
Table 3. An overview of the literature regarding studies with significant microstructural changes in the uncinate fasciculus in association with PD symptoms. (NA is a written abbreviation for not applicable.)
Between-Group Findings Symptomatology Correlations with DTI Metrics Complementary Information of Participants
StudyFAMDRD or AD increasesAdditional imaging resultsApplied testsSignificant associationsDrug exposureGroup matches
Boyu Chen et al., 2015 [26]PD-Cu > PDD inbilateral uncinate fasciculusPDD > PD-Cu in bilateral uncinate fasciculusHC > PDDNANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MoCA, MMSEMD value is negatively correlated with MoCa scores in UFNA
Zonghong Li et al., 2020 [27]No significant differencesNon-depressedPD, depressed PD > HC in left uncinate fasciculusRD: No significant differencesAD: non-depressed PD, depressed PD > HC in right hippocampal part of cingulum and bilateral uncinate fasciculusNAHDRS, MMSE, UPDRS-III, H&YNANAAge, sex, years of education orMMSE
Florian Holtbernd et al., 2019 [28]PD, RBD > HC in left uncinate fasciculusNo significant differencebetween RBD, PD, and HCNo significant differencebetween RBD, PD, and HCNAMDS UPDRS-III, MoCA, H&YNAONAge-matched HCs
Junyan Sun et al., 2021 [30]NAPD > HC inbilateral uncinate fasciculusNANAH&Y, UPDRS-IIINANAAge, sex, education-matched HCs
Christina Andica et al., 2019 [32]HC > PD in UF and cingulum hippocampusHC < PD in UFAD: HC < PD in UFRD: HC < PD in UF and cingulum hippocampusNAMDS-UPDRS, H&YNAON
Christina Andica et al., 2020 [33]HC > PD-woNCP in UF and right cingulum hippocampusHC > PD-wNCPin cingulum hippocampus and UF HC < PD-woNCP in UFHC < PD-wNCPs inright cingulum hippocampus and UFRD: HC < PD-woNCP in UF and cingulum hippocampusHC < PD-wNCP in UF and cingulum hippocampusAD: HC < PD-wNCP in UFTOI:FA:PD-woNCP < HCPD-wNCP < HCMD: PD-woNCP > HCPD-wNCP > HCRD: PD-woNCP > HCPD-wNCP > HCH&Y, UPDRS I, UPDRS-III, TOINAONAgeand sex-matched HCs
Nan-Kuei Chen et al., 2018 [34]PD > HCin Cingulum (hippocampus)NANANAMMSE, UPDRS-III, H&YThe FA values negativelycorrelated with the UPDRS-III scores across PD patients in Cingulum (hippocampus) and UFNA
Haruka Takeshige-Amano et al., 2022 [35]NAPD-ICB > HC in uncinate fasciculusPD-nICB > PD-ICB in cingulum and UFNANAH&Y, UPDRS I, UPDRS-IIINAON
Jia-Yong Wu et al., 2017 [36]PDD < PDnD in UF and cingulumNANANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSE, HDRSFA values in the left cingulumand left superior longitudinal fasciculusof the PDD group were negatively correlatedwith HDRS scores, but no correlation was found with otherdisease characteristics including age, duration, UPDRS-III, H-Y scale, MMSENAAge, age of onset, disease duration, sex
Sonia Di Tella et al.,2020 [38]No significant differencesPD > HC in left UFNANAH&Y, UPDRS-IIIFA of the left UF was positively correlated with the accuracy in theglobal word production (N + V), N production, Vproduction and semantic fluencyFA of the right UF was positively correlated with the global word production and N productionno significant correlations were observedbetween FA and MD and the three measures of production task (N, V and N + V production)ONAge, sex, disease duration and years of education
Lubin Gou et al., 2018 [44]All PD < HC in left uncinate fasciculusNANANAMoCA, MDS-UPDRS-III, H&YNAOFFSex, age, MoCA, and educationyears
Xiaojun Guan et al., 2018 [48]PD < HC only inthe right UFPD > HC in theleft cingulumRD: PD > HCAD: PD < HCNAUPDRS, H&Y, MMSEIn the right cingulate gyrus, significant correlation of increasedMMS with disease durationNAAge and sex
Tao Guo et al., 2020 [51]No significantdifferences in the FAS-depression > HC inuncinate fasciculusNo difference in the MD among the other pairs of comparisonsNANAGCO, PDQ-39, UPDRS, H&Y, MMSENAONAge, sex, education
F Imperiale et al., 2017 [54]PD-ICB < PD no-ICB, HCin left uncinate fasciculusPD-ICB > PD no-ICB, HCin right uncinate fasciculusNANAQUIP, H&Y, UPDRS-III, HDRSNAONAll matched in:Age, sexEducationPatients matchedin age at PDonset diseasedurationSide of onsetH&Y scoresUPDRS-IIIcognitive status
Olaia Lucas-Jim´enez et al., 2015 [56]PD < HC in right ACTPD > HC in left PCTNANANAUDPRS, H&YIn correlations between verbal memory and FA of the right PCT, FA correlated positivelywith correct rejections andnegatively with false positives in HC groupbetween brain activation in the left IOFC during the verbal learning memory fMRI task and FA of theright UFON
Takahiro Koinumaa 2021 [57]HC < PARK2 inuncinate fasciculusRD: HC < PARK2 inuncinate fasciculusNANAUDPRS III, H&YIn PRKN AD values were negatively correlatedwith the serum levels of 9-hydroxystearate, while the MD and RD values were positivelycorrelated with these levels in UFONSex, age, cerebrovascular risk factors
Charalampos Georgiopoulos et al., 2017 [58]NANAAD: PD < HC in left uncinate fasciculusNAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSENAONAge, sex
Kazufumi Kikuchi et al., 2017 [60]PD-MIBGL < PD-MIBGH in left uncinate fasciculusNo significantdifferencesNANAMDS, H&Y, MMSENAONAge, sex, diseaseduration, MMSE, H&Y stage
Maria Chondrogiorgi et al., 2019 [63]PDD < PD-CTRL in cingulum (cingulategyrus) and uncinate fasciculusNo significantdifferencesNo significantdifferencesNAH&Y, MMSE, HAM-D, PD-CRSLower total PD-CRS score was associated with FA decreases incingulum (cingulate gyrus), cingulum (hippocampus) and uncinate fasciculusONSex, years of education
Yuko Koshimori et al., 2015 [64]NAPD > HC in cingulum anduncinate fasciculusNANAMoCA, UPDRS-III,NAONAge, sex, education, BDI and handedness
Sara Pietracupa et al., 2017 [66]NAHC < PD-FOG, PD-NFOGPD-FOG > PD-NFOGin UFHC, PD-FOG < PD-NFOGHC < PD-FOG in Cingulum angular bundleRD: HC < PD-FOG, PD-NFOGPD-FOG < PD-NFOGin UFHC, PD-FOG < PD-NFOGHC < PD-FOG in Cingulum angular bundleAD: HC, PD-FOG < PD-NFOGHC > PD-FOG in UFNAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSE, FAB, HAM-DDTI values in the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum(both cingulate gyrus and angular bundles) bilaterallysignificantly correlated with the cognitive scores, as assessedby the MMSEDTI values in the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum(angular bundle and cingulate gyrus)bilaterally significantly correlated with frontal abilities, asindicated by the FAB scoressignificant correlation between DTI values in the right uncinate fasciculus and the HAM-D scoresON and OFFAge and sex
A. Inguanzo et al., 2020 [67]PD1 < HC inuncinate fasciculusNANANAUPDRS-III, H&Y, MMSENAONSex andyears of education
Takashi Ogawa 2021 [71]PD-nLID < HCPD-nLID < PD-LID in ufNANANAMDS-UPDRS, H&YNAONAge, sex
Jinqiu Yu et al., 2022 [72]G/G > G/A in UFNARD: G/G < G/A in UFNAMMSE, MoCA, H&Y, UPDRS-IIINAON
Qin Shen et al., 2021 [73]sdPD < ndPD in UFsdPD < mdPD in UFNo significant difference between ndPD and mdPDNARD: sdPD > ndPD in UFNAH&Y, MMSE, CDR, UPDRS-III, BDINosignificant correlation was found between BDI scores andFA values in other tracts.NAAge, sex, education, CDR, MMSE, PD duration, H&Y scales, and UPDRS-III scores
Ming-Ching Wen et al., 2018 [76]TD > HC in right cingulumTD > PIGD in right and left cingulumno significant between HC and PIGDNARD: TD < HC in right cingulum, PIGD > TD in UFAD: PIGD > HC in UFNAUDPRS, H&Y, MOCA, GDS, Cardiovascular burden, Head motionNAOFFAge, sex, education, handedness, dominant side, PDduration/H&Y scale, cardiovascular burden, head motion
Jingqiang Wang et al., 2020 [77]SignificantDifference in UFNAAD: SignificantDifference in cingulum bundle MoCA, UPDRS-III, GDSCingulum bundle have correlation with GDSNA
Elisa Canu et al., 2015 [49]NAPD-punding > HC in right uncinate fasciculusNANAH&Y, UPDRS-III, MMSE, HAMA, HDRSNAONAge, sex, and education
Suk Yun Kang et al., 2019 [84]PD < PD with fatigue in right cingulum, UFPD > PD with fatigue in right cingulumRD: PD > PD with fatigue in UF, cingulumNAK-MMSE, MoCA, BDI, UPDRS, H&Y, FSSNANA
Jilu Princy Mole et al., 2016 [25] PD < HC in UFPD > HC in left UFRD: PD > HC in right UFNAUDPRS, H&Y, MOCANAON
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rashidi, F.; Khanmirzaei, M.H.; Hosseinzadeh, F.; Kolahchi, Z.; Jafarimehrabady, N.; Moghisseh, B.; Aarabi, M.H. Cingulum and Uncinate Fasciculus Microstructural Abnormalities in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies. Biology 2023, 12, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030475

AMA Style

Rashidi F, Khanmirzaei MH, Hosseinzadeh F, Kolahchi Z, Jafarimehrabady N, Moghisseh B, Aarabi MH. Cingulum and Uncinate Fasciculus Microstructural Abnormalities in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies. Biology. 2023; 12(3):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rashidi, Fatemeh, Mohammad Hossein Khanmirzaei, Farbod Hosseinzadeh, Zahra Kolahchi, Niloofar Jafarimehrabady, Bardia Moghisseh, and Mohammad Hadi Aarabi. 2023. "Cingulum and Uncinate Fasciculus Microstructural Abnormalities in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies" Biology 12, no. 3: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030475

APA Style

Rashidi, F., Khanmirzaei, M. H., Hosseinzadeh, F., Kolahchi, Z., Jafarimehrabady, N., Moghisseh, B., & Aarabi, M. H. (2023). Cingulum and Uncinate Fasciculus Microstructural Abnormalities in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies. Biology, 12(3), 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop