Next Article in Journal
A New Type of CuNi/TiB2 Thin-Film Thermocouple Fabricated by Magnetron Sputtering
Previous Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Analysis of Wetting Transitions on Micro/Nanopillared Superhydrophobic Surfaces
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Fabrication of Ni–Co Alloy over a Wide pH Range Using Sodium Citrate as a Complexing Agent
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flexible Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile/ZnO Nanofiber Membrane as Separator for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Cycle Stability

1
Laboratory of Xinjiang Native Medicinal and Edible Plant Resources Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Kashi University, Kashi 844000, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(2), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020141
Submission received: 4 January 2025 / Revised: 20 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 25 January 2025

Abstract

:
In sodium-ion batteries, the research of electrode and separator materials must work in tandem. However, the existing separators still need to go through a drawn-out procedure in order to satisfy the engineering and technological standards of sodium-ion batteries. A new sodium-ion battery separator was created for this investigation. Electrostatic spinning was used to create polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/ZnO nanofiber films, and varying the ZnO nanoparticle doping level enhanced the nanofiber separator’s cyclic stability. A new flexible PAN separator for sodium-ion batteries is presented in this study. It has good commercial value and may find use in flexible, high safety sodium-ion battery systems. Additionally, it offers some theoretical direction for creating organic polymer separators with excellent safety.

1. Introduction

Sodium-ion batteries have gradually become a research hotspot owing to their use of abundant sodium resources, low cost, and similar electrochemical mechanisms to lithium-ion batteries. They have the potential to make outstanding contributions to large-scale energy storage systems [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, to meet the engineering and technical requirements of sodium-ion batteries, the available separators still need to go through a long process. As is well known, separators play an important role in preventing contact between the cathode and anode, as well as allowing ions to coordinate with the electrolyte within the battery, and have a significant impact on the performance of the battery, such as thermal safety, mechanical safety, rate performance, and cycle life [7,8,9,10,11]. Therefore, the synergistic development of separator and electrode materials in sodium-ion batteries is extremely necessary [12].
In recent years, with the gradual maturity of electrostatic spinning technology and the good heat resistance of some polymers, the method of using non-woven fabrics prepared from them as separators for lithium-ion batteries has become popular. Non-woven fabric membranes generally have good porosity, up to 80% or more, and larger pore sizes, which are very conducive to absorbing and storing electrolytes [13,14]. High safety diaphragms not only require a high heat-resistant shrinkage temperature to prevent direct contact between the positive and negative electrodes of the battery at high temperatures but also have good mechanical strength [15,16]. They can not only maintain stability during battery assembly and other operations but also effectively prevent direct contact between the positive and negative electrodes inside the battery at the pole end, which can lead to internal short circuits and further increases in temperature, causing greater danger [17,18].
This article mainly explores the preparation and characterization of a novel separator for sodium-ion batteries. PAN/ZnO (polyacrylonitrile/ZnO nanofiber films) nanofiber thin films were prepared by electrostatic spinning technology, and the cyclic stability of the nanofiber separator was improved by changing the amount of ZnO nanoparticle doping. This article provides a novel flexible PAN composite separator for sodium-ion batteries, which has potential application prospects in flexible and high safety sodium-ion battery systems and has good commercial value. Moreover, it provides certain theoretical guidance for the preparation of high safety organic polymer separators.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of PAN/ZnO by Electrospinning as a Sodium-Ion Battery Separator

The method of preparing PAN/ZnO by electrospinning is similar to many previous reports. First, 3 g of PAN is dissolved in a solvent mixed with DMAC, and PAN solution with a mass fraction of 13% is prepared; the required amounts of ZnO nanoparticles (with the average size of 7 nm and with the surface charged, from Shanghai Degussa Co., Shanghai, China) were weighed out and then mixed with PAN solution, and ZnO with a mass fraction of 4%, 7%, and 10% was prepared. A homogeneous solution without bubbles was obtained by placing using an internal mixer for more than 24 h. Then, fill a 15 mL syringe with PAN solution and hold it on the electrostatic spinning equipment. Keep the temperature in the electrostatic spinning room at 25 °C, the humidity at 25%–35%, the electrostatic spinning voltage at 15 KV, and the spinning injection speed at 0.5 mL/h. The spinning spray formed is received on the aluminum foil, and the spinning time is controlled. When the thickness of the formed diaphragm reaches 30 mm, spinning is stopped, and after the solvent is volatilized for half a day, the diaphragm is placed in a vacuum drying oven and dried at 80 °C for 24 h to enhance the thermodynamic stability of the diaphragm. PAN was calcined to produce CNFs (carbon nanofibers) and carbonized in Ar atmosphere at 600 °C for 4 h. The final PAN/ZnO composite films were obtained after they were peeled off from the glass substrates with thicknesses of 24 ± 3 μm.

2.2. Characterization

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JSM-6360LV, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was employed for high-resolution examination of the surface morphology and topography, enabling detailed observations of the nanostructures present in the material. X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8Advance, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) patterns were recorded using a Cu Kα radiation diffractometer at a scanning speed of 10°/min in the 2θ range of 10–80° to further investigate the crystal structure. Analysis of these diffraction patterns provided valuable information about the crystalline phases and their orientations within the nanocomposites. In addition to FESEM and XRD, transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Fei Tecnai G2 F20S-Twin, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was utilized for exploring both the morphology and structure on a finer scale.

2.3. Electrochemical Test

Manufacture of the Coin Cell

The prepared CNFs were cut into round pole sheets of about 1.6 cm2 for use, and the PAN and PAN/ZnO-4%, -7%, and -10% (4, 7, and 10 wt%) were cut into round membranes of about 2.06 cm2 for use. The PAN/ZnO-4%, -7%, and -10% were used as the separator. Half the cells were assembled using 2016 coin-type cells. For sodium batteries, sodium metal was used as the counter and reference electrode, while 1 M NaClO4 in ethylene carbonate (EC):propylene carbonate (PC) (1:1 in volume) was used as the electrolyte. A LAND battery test macro was used for the measurement of the circulation and rate capability at a potential range of 0.01–2 V (vs. Na/Na+). Circle voltammetry (CV) was evaluated on a CHI660e electrochemical workstation between 0.01 and 2 V at a sweep speed of 0.1 mV/s (Figure 1).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the field emission scanning electron microscope figure of ZnO nanoparticles. From Figure 2a, it can be seen that ZnO nanoparticles have a uniformly distributed nanosphere structure without large clusters. From Figure 2b, it can be seen that the diameter of the ZnO nanoparticle is about 20 nm.
Figure 3a shows the carbon nanofiber applied to the negative electrode of the sodium-ion battery in this article. The diameter of the nanofiber is around 200 nm, and the surface is smooth without defects, with a uniform diameter distribution. Figure 3b–f show the PAN/ZnO nanofiber applied to sodium-ion battery separators in this article. Figure 3b,c show the PAN/ZnO nanofiber doped with 4%. From the figure, it can be seen that the diameter of the PAN/ZnO-4% nanofiber is about 500 nm, and the pore size distribution is disordered, with a pore size of about 7 μm. As shown in Figure 3b,c, the PAN/ZnO nanofiber doped with 7% is shown. It can be seen from the images that the diameter of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber is about 500 nm, and the pore size distribution is disordered, with a pore size of about 3 um. Compared to Figure 3d,e, it can be observed that the pore size of PAN/ZnO-7% has decreased, and there are no obvious droplet or bead defects in the nanofiber, resulting in uniform fiber thickness. Shown in Figure 3f is the 10% doped PAN/ZnO nanofiber, and it can be seen from the figure that there are obvious irregular small balls present, with uneven distribution of the fiber thickness.
Figure 4 shows the transmission electron microscopy figure of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber. From Figure 4a, it can be seen that the diameter of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber is 500 nm, and the nanoparticles of ZnO can be clearly seen. From Figure 4b, it can be seen that the diameter of the nanoparticles in the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber is approximately 20 nm, and they are uniformly distributed inside the composite nanofiber. The nanofiber structure is intact.
Figure 5a shows the XRD of a carbon nanofiber and PAN nanofiber. From Figure 5a, it can be seen that there are two broad peaks of 16.3° and 22.3° for PAN; after heat treatment of the PAN nanofiber, the carbon nanofiber applied in this article was obtained. As shown in Figure 5a, the carbon fibers disappeared with a broad wind of 16.3° and only had a broad peak of 22.6°, indicating complete carbonization and obtaining the complete carbon nanofiber. Figure 5b shows the XRD patterns of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers. It can be seen from the images that there are two broad peaks of about 16.6° and 22.5° in the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers, which are characteristic peaks of PAN and ZnO nanoparticles, as at 2θ, sharp characteristic diffraction peaks appear at 31.8°, 34.4°, 36.2°, 47.5°, 56.6°, 62.8°, 66.3°, 67.9°, and 69°, respectively. From Figure 5b, it can be seen that, for the PAN/ZnO nanofiber with doping concentrations of 4%, 7%, and 10%, the higher the doping concentration of the ZnO nanoparticles in the XRD pattern, the stronger the diffraction peak of ZnO. The XRD pattern in Figure 5b shows the diffraction peak structure of PAN and ZnO. Figure 5c shows a physical image of the PAN/ZnO nanofiber, which has excellent flexibility.
Figure 6a,b show the cyclic voltammetry curves of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separator sodium-ion batteries. According to the CV curves in CNF and lithium metal half-cells, the operating voltage window of the half-cell is 0–2 V. From the figure, it can be seen that the cyclic voltammetry peaks of 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries are similar, and the cyclic voltammetry curves of PAN/ZnO nanofiber-4% and PAN/ZnO nanofiber-7%, and PAN/ZnO nanofiber as the separator for sodium-ion batteries, have good repeatability for two to three cycles and excellent cycling performance.
Figure 7a shows the cycle curves of 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries. It can be seen from Figure 6a that the cycle stability of PAN/ZnO-4% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries is poor. At a current density of 0.1 A/g after 40 cycles, the discharge-specific capacity of PAN/ZnO-4% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries rapidly decreases, and it only has a specific capacity of 13.02 mAh/g after 120 cycles, accounting for 13.6% of the initial discharge-specific capacity. The cycling stability of PAN/ZnO-10% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries is stronger than that of PAN/ZnO-4% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries, but the capacity is lower. At a current density of 0.1 A/g after 20 cycles, it has a specific capacity of 17.3 mAh/g−1, with a capacity retention rate of 54.8% for the initial discharge-specific capacity. PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries has a better cycling performance. After 120 cycles at a current density of 0.1 A/g, the discharge-specific capacity of PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries still remains at 92.22 mAh/g, accounting for 95.6% of the initial discharge-specific capacity, and its Coulomb effect remains around 97%. The PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber has a better cycling performance and stability as a separator for sodium-ion batteries, attributed to their smaller pore size and more uniform nanofiber structure without small balls.
Figure 7b shows the rate plots of the 7% and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers used as separator sodium-ion batteries. At current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 A/g, the discharge-specific capacities of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber used as a separator for sodium-ion batteries are 125.4, 32.3, 15.4, and 6.3 mAh/g, respectively. When the current density recovers to 0.1 C, it can be maintained at the reversible discharge-specific capacity of 92.1 mAh/g. Compared to PAN/ZnO-10% nanofiber membrane sodium-ion batteries, PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber membrane sodium-ion batteries have a better specific capacity at different current densities. Figure 7c shows the first cycle charge discharge curves of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofiber membrane sodium-ion batteries. The PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber membrane for sodium-ion batteries has a higher specific capacity and Coulombic efficiency. Figure 7d shows the charge–discharge curves of a PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber membrane sodium-ion battery at different current densities. It can be seen from the figure that the specific capacity changes significantly when the current density increases to 0.2 A/g. However, as the current density increases, the trend of the specific capacity changes gradually decreases and tends to stabilize after reaching 0.3 A/g.
Figure 8 shows the infiltration angle of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber in an electrolyte, which is lost instantaneously after dropping. The PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber has excellent electrolysate storage properties, which may be due to the structure of the nanofiber membrane, which increases the infiltration of the electrolysate. In general, the lower contact angle helps to promote the transmission of the ionizer, thereby improving the cycle performance for sodium-ion batteries.
Shown in Figure 9a is the effect diagram of clamping at the beginning, stretching until pulling it off.
This material has good mechanical properties and high ductility. Now, the mechanical properties of each component are tested, and the scores of each group are obtained, as shown in the figure above. The blue line, the red line, and the black line represent PAN/ZnO-4%, PAN/ZnO-7%, and PAN/ZnO-10%. With the increase in pressure, the stress of the three color lines changes significantly.
First, when the tensible strength of PAN/ZnO-4% is close to 2 MPa, there is a clear peak, and the elongation reaches 8% before it breaks. Secondly, when the tensible strength of PAN/ZnO-7% is close to 5.5 MPa, the elongation reaches 70% before it will break. Finally, when the tensible strength of PAN/ZnO-10% is close to 4 MPa, there is an obvious peak, and the elongation is about 55% before it breaks. As shown in Figure 9b, we know that the stress and pressure obtained are different depending on the amount of PAN/ZnO doped.
As shown in Figure 9d, the amount of PAN/ZnO-4% breaks when the extendable force is close to 2 MPa, the amount of PAN/ZnO-7% breaks when the extendable force is close to 5.5 MPa, and the amount of PAN/ZnO-10% breaks when the extendable force is close to 3.5 MPa.
In conclusion, we may infer that the stability test of each component’s ductility and tensile stability is determined by comparing the quantity of PAN/ZnO doped in each component. Therefore, it will have good mechanical qualities, depending on how much PAN/ZnO is applied. When utilized as a sodium-ion diaphragm, PAN/ZnO-7%exhibits the highest stability and the best mechanical characteristics throughout the charge and discharge cycles, as shown in Figure 10.
PAN/ZnO nanofiber films were prepared by electrostatic spinning technology, and the cyclic stability of the nanofiber separator was improved by changing the amount of ZnO nanoparticle doping. The nanoparticles in the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber are uniformly distributed inside the composite nanofiber. The PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber has excellent electrolysate storage properties, and the lower contact angle helps to promote the transmission of the ionizer, thereby improving the cycle performance for sodium-ion batteries. Using electrodes with excellent electrolyte wettability, the assembled sodium-ion battery has high energy density and power density, a stable cycling performance, and good safety performance. When utilized as a sodium-ion diaphragm, PAN/ZnO-7% has the best mechanical properties and the strongest stability during the charge and discharge cycles. Compared to 4% and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries, PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries has a better specific capacity at different current densities. This work provides new insights into improved diaphragm strategies that are expected to be widely applied to sodium-ion batteries and large-scale clean energy storage technologies.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the novel sodium-ion battery separator was prepared. PAN/ZnO nanofiber films were prepared by electrostatic spinning technology, and the cyclic stability of the nanofiber separator was improved by changing the amount of ZnO nanoparticle doping. Compared to 4% and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries, the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber as a separator for sodium-ion batteries has a better specific capacity at different current densities. The PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber has a better cycling performance and stability as a separator for sodium-ion batteries, attributed to their smaller pore size and more uniform nanofiber structure without small balls. This article provided a novel flexible PAN composite separator for sodium-ion batteries, which has potential application prospects in flexible and high safety sodium-ion battery systems and has good commercial value. Moreover, it provides certain theoretical guidance for the preparation of high safety organic polymer separators.

Author Contributions

Methodology, X.M.; Formal analysis, X.M.; Resources, S.L.; Data curation, X.Y.; Writing—original draft, X.M.; Project administration, A.Y.; Funding acquisition, M.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Tianshan Innovation Team Plan of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2023D14002), Fundamental Research Funds for outstanding young teachers of Heilongjiang Province (YQJH2023227), Research Fund for the Dongji Academic Team Program of Jiamusi University (2024-KYYWF-0619), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Heilongjiang Province ecological environmental protection research project (2 HST2023ST006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that the data are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, H.; Kim, S.W.; Park, Y.U.; Gwon, H.; Seo, D.H.; Kim, Y.; Kang, K. SnO2/graphene composite with high lithium storage capability for lithium rechargeable batteries. Nano Res. 2010, 3, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J.; Cheng, F.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. MoS2 nanoflowers with expanded interlayers as high-performance anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. 2015, 53, 12794–12798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, S.W.; Seo, D.H.; Ma, X.; Ceder, G.; Kang, K. Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmed, S.; Ali, A.; Asif, M.; Shim, J.; Park, G. Exploring innovative trends and advancements in rechargeable zinc-air batteries. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2010, 170, 113288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jian, Z.; Han, W.; Lu, X.; Yang, H.; Hu, Y.-S. Superior Electrochemical Performance and Storage Mechanism of Na3V2(PO4)3Cathode for Room-Temperature Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 3, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, S.; Xia, L.; Yu, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H. Sodium-ion Batteries: Free-Standing Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanofiber Films: Integrated Electrodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Ultralong Cycle Life and Superior Rate Capability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 7, 1502217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, D.; Cho, M.; Cho, K. Rational Design of Na(Li1/3Mn2/3)O2 Operated by Anionic Redox Reactions for Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, C.; Xu, T.; Yan, C.; Xu, J.; Kong, D.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, W.; Shi, Y.; Ke, C.; Li, X.; et al. Mechanism investigation of high performance Na3V2(PO4)2O2F/reduced graphene oxide cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2021, 482, 228906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, D.; Tang, X.; Guo, X.; Li, P.; Wang, G. Polyolefin–Based Janus Separator for Rechargeable Sodium Batteries. Angew. Chem. 2020, 59, 16725–16734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rost, A.; Schilm, J.; Langklotz, U.; Schneider, M. Glass-Ceramic Solid Electrolytes for Lithium and Sodium-ion Batteries. Meet. Abstr. 2014, 2, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, W.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C.; Feng, X.; Zhang, J.; Guan, L.; Mi, L.; Cui, S. Electrospun Flexible Cellulose Acetate-Based Separators for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Ultralong Cycle Stability and Excellent Wettability: The Role of Interface Chemical Groups. Acs ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 23883–23890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Babiker, D.; Usha, Z.R.; Wan, C.; Hassaan, M.M.E.; Chen, X.; Li, L. Recent progress of composite polyethylene separators for lithium/sodium batteries. J. Power Sources 2023, 564, 232853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, F.L.; Gong, R.; Porat, I. Mass production of nanofibre assemblies by electrostatic spinning. Polym. Int. 2010, 58, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zeng, T.; Feng, D.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, R. Confining Nano-GeP in Nitrogenous Hollow Carbon Fibers toward Flexible and High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 32978–32988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, W.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, J.; Zhong, X.; Gu, L.; Yu, Y. Germanium nanoparticles encapsulated in flexible carbon nanofiber as self-supported electrodes for high performance lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 4532–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cao, D.; Deng, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, G. Designing polyimide/polyacrylonitrile/polyimide sandwich composite separator for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arifeen, W.U.; Choi, J.; Yoo, K.; Shim, J.; Ko, T.J. A nano-silica/polyacrylonitrile/polyimide composite separator for advanced fast charging lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 417, 128075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hsieh, C.T.; Lin, S.C.; Lee, C.H.; Liu, C.F.; Hu, C.C. Designing Multifunctional Polyethylene-Polyimide Composite Separators for Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A3132–A3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fabrication process of the PAN/ZnO nanofiber.
Figure 1. Fabrication process of the PAN/ZnO nanofiber.
Coatings 15 00141 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of ZnO nanoparticles (a,b).
Figure 2. SEM images of ZnO nanoparticles (a,b).
Coatings 15 00141 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of carbon nanofiber (a), PAN/ZnO nanofiber-4% (b,c), PAN/ZnO nanofiber-7% (d,e), and PAN/ZnO nanofiber-10% (f).
Figure 3. SEM images of carbon nanofiber (a), PAN/ZnO nanofiber-4% (b,c), PAN/ZnO nanofiber-7% (d,e), and PAN/ZnO nanofiber-10% (f).
Coatings 15 00141 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) TEM images of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber (the yellow circle is a nanoparticle).
Figure 4. (a,b) TEM images of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber (the yellow circle is a nanoparticle).
Coatings 15 00141 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the carbon nanofiber and PAN nanofiber (a), PAN/ZnO nanofiber (b), and physical image of the PAN/ZnO nanofiber (c).
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the carbon nanofiber and PAN nanofiber (a), PAN/ZnO nanofiber (b), and physical image of the PAN/ZnO nanofiber (c).
Coatings 15 00141 g005
Figure 6. (ac) The cyclic voltammetry of 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries.
Figure 6. (ac) The cyclic voltammetry of 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries.
Coatings 15 00141 g006
Figure 7. The cycle curves of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries (a). Rate capacities of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers (b). Charge–discharge curves of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers at the first cycle (c). Charge–discharge curves of the 7% PAN/ZnO nanofiber for different current densities (d).
Figure 7. The cycle curves of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers as separators for sodium-ion batteries (a). Rate capacities of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers (b). Charge–discharge curves of the 4%, 7%, and 10% PAN/ZnO nanofibers at the first cycle (c). Charge–discharge curves of the 7% PAN/ZnO nanofiber for different current densities (d).
Coatings 15 00141 g007
Figure 8. Infiltration angle of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber membrane with an electrolyte.
Figure 8. Infiltration angle of the PAN/ZnO-7% nanofiber membrane with an electrolyte.
Coatings 15 00141 g008
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of PAN/ZnO. (a) The optical photos of the stress–strain behavior of PAN/ZnO-10%. (b) Stress–strain curves of PAN/ZnO. (c) Extension at the peaks of three different PAN/ZnO. (d) Tensile strengths of three different PAN/ZnO.
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of PAN/ZnO. (a) The optical photos of the stress–strain behavior of PAN/ZnO-10%. (b) Stress–strain curves of PAN/ZnO. (c) Extension at the peaks of three different PAN/ZnO. (d) Tensile strengths of three different PAN/ZnO.
Coatings 15 00141 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of PAN/ZnO as a separator for enhancing the electrochemical properties of sodium-ion batteries.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of PAN/ZnO as a separator for enhancing the electrochemical properties of sodium-ion batteries.
Coatings 15 00141 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mu, X.; Yin, X.; Qi, M.; Yusuf, A.; Liu, S. Flexible Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile/ZnO Nanofiber Membrane as Separator for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Cycle Stability. Coatings 2025, 15, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020141

AMA Style

Mu X, Yin X, Qi M, Yusuf A, Liu S. Flexible Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile/ZnO Nanofiber Membrane as Separator for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Cycle Stability. Coatings. 2025; 15(2):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mu, Xin, Xiangyu Yin, Meili Qi, Abdulla Yusuf, and Shibin Liu. 2025. "Flexible Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile/ZnO Nanofiber Membrane as Separator for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Cycle Stability" Coatings 15, no. 2: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020141

APA Style

Mu, X., Yin, X., Qi, M., Yusuf, A., & Liu, S. (2025). Flexible Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile/ZnO Nanofiber Membrane as Separator for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Cycle Stability. Coatings, 15(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop