Next Article in Journal
Temperature Sensing via Electromagnetically Induced Transparency Vapor
Next Article in Special Issue
Interaction Regularity of Biomolecules on Mg and Mg-Based Alloy Surfaces: A First-Principles Study
Previous Article in Journal
MACl-Induced Controlled Crystallization in Sequentially Deposited Perovskites for High-Efficiency and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Process Parameters on Workpiece Roundness in the Shoe-Type Centerless Grinding Operation for Internal Raceway of Ball Bearings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Green Controllable Preparation of Coal Gangue-Based 13-X Molecular Sieves and Its CO2 Capture Application

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
3
Shaanxi Longmen Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Hancheng 715400, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(11), 1886; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13111886
Submission received: 19 September 2023 / Revised: 28 October 2023 / Accepted: 29 October 2023 / Published: 2 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Surface and Interface Properties of Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
Carbon dioxide emissions are the primary and most direct contributor to global warming, posing a significant hazard to both the environment and human health. In response to this challenge, there has been a growing interest in the development of effective carbon capture technologies. This study involved the synthesis of 13-X molecular sieve porous materials using solid waste coal gangue as a source of silicon and aluminum. The synthesis process involved the controlled utilization of an “alkali fusion-hydrothermal” reaction system. The resulting materials were characterized for their structure, morphology, and crystal composition using X-ray diffraction and field emission scanning electron microscopy. These 13-X molecular sieve materials were employed as adsorbents to capture carbon dioxide gas, and their adsorption performance was investigated. The findings indicated that the 13-X molecular sieve materials possess uniform pores and complete crystalline morphologies, and they exhibited an adsorption capacity of 1.82 mmol/g for carbon dioxide at 0 °C. Consequently, this study not only converted solid waste gangue into high-value products but also demonstrated effective atmospheric carbon dioxide capture, suggesting that gangue-based 13-X molecular sieves may serve as a potential candidate for carbon capture.

1. Introduction

One of the primary contributors to global warming is the substantial volume of carbon dioxide emissions resulting from human activities, such as the combustion of coal and natural gas for electricity generation [1]. Over the past few centuries, atmospheric CO2 levels have risen dramatically to 418 ppm, doubling global CO2 emissions compared to the 1970s. This has led to the production of approximately 3.2 billion tons of CO2 annually and a 1.5 °C increase in global average temperatures, exerting significant pressure on environmental management [2,3,4,5]. Records show that even within indoor spaces, CO2 concentrations continue to rise, posing long-term threats to human health, travel, food, security, water resources, the rising sea level, and biodiversity [6,7,8]. Consequently, there is a need to control CO2 levels and research effective methods for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere, with adsorption technology emerging as a promising avenue due to its versatility and applicability [9,10]. Currently, available adsorbents include activated carbon [11,12], graphene [13,14], metal oxides [15], metal–organic frameworks [16,17], and zeolites [18,19,20], all possessing CO2 adsorption sites within their crystal structures. In light of these pressing challenges, it is imperative to urgently address the rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
Molecular sieves, also known as zeolites, are crystalline silica–aluminates composed of [SiO4]4– and [AlO4]5– tetrahedra, forming three-dimensional spatial network structures with abundant fixed-pore size channels or cage structures [21,22,23]. These unique pore structures and large surface areas make them valuable in the realm of adsorbents [24,25,26]. As coal remains a major energy source, a substantial amount of coal gangue is produced during coal mining and washing processes. It is estimated that global coal production and consumption reached 8.1 billion tons and 15.7 billion tons, respectively, in 2019 since the 18th century [27,28]. Coal gangue (CG), a byproduct of coal mining, is associated with coal and yields 100–150 kg of gangue for every ton of coal produced [29]. In China, the cumulative accumulation of coal gangue has reached 4.5 billion tons due to years of coal mining, with an annual growth rate of 300–350 million tons [30]. This not only occupies significant land but also leads to air and water pollution, resulting in ecological degradation and health risks [31,32,33]. Given that coal gangue primarily contains silica and aluminum clay minerals [34,35], it is an ideal raw material for high-purity molecular sieve synthesis, addressing the challenge of coal gangue treatment and disposal.
Addressing these challenges, this study focused on the preparation of gangue-based 13-X molecular sieve porous materials using coal gangue as a source of silicon and aluminum. Optimal synthesis conditions for 13-X molecular sieves were explored, including Si/Al ratio (PCG to NaAlO2 mass ratio), alkalinity (NaOH(aq) concentration), crystallization temperature, and hydrothermal time. The resulting molecular sieve porous materials exhibited excellent CO2 adsorption performance, offering a sustainable solution to both coal gangue accumulation and the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations, promoting circular economy and waste management objectives.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

In the experiment, coal gangue was used as raw material to provide silicon and aluminum sources, and it was provided by China Shaanxi Shendong Coal Mining Group of Shaanxi Province, China. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, AR, ≥99.70%) and sodium meta-aluminate (NaAlO2, AR, ≥99.70%) were purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory. The experimental water was homemade deionized water prepared in the laboratory. All chemical reagents were used as they were without further purification.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Synthesis of Gangue-Based 13-X Molecular Sieve

The crystal structure of inert amorphous quartz and kaolinite in raw coal gangue is decomposed in the strong alkali environment and participates in the chemical reaction to produce soluble aluminosilicate Na2SiO3 and NaAlO2, eliminating the influence of quartz and kaolinite on the purity of the product. Through the preliminary experiment, the best ash-to-alkali ratio of pre-treated coal gangue has been explored, and the treatment methods are as follows: The raw coal gangue powder was mixed with solid NaOH particles by mass ratio of 1:0.6 in a mortar and ground thoroughly, placed in a muffle furnace, and calcined at 750 °C under air conditions for 4 h to obtain pretreatment gangue (PCG). PCG (7.0 g) and NaAlO2 (1.17 g) were added to NaOH solution (0.3 mol·L−1, 75 mL). Then, the stirred mixture was subjected to hydrothermal synthesis reaction at 80 °C for 10 h in stainless steel PTFE reactor liner; after the reactor cooled naturally, the hydrothermal products were filtered, washed, and dried to synthesize 13-X molecular sieve, and Figure 1 shows the flow chart of molecular sieve preparation.
In the context of adsorbing airborne substances, most adsorbents are in granular form, necessitating the transformation of powdered molecular sieve materials into granules [36,37]. The synthesized 13-X molecular sieve powder is initially washed to achieve a pH of approximately 7 and dried at 60 °C for 3–4 h. Subsequently, the powder is compressed into cylinders under a pressure of 20–30 MPa, and particles with diameters ranging from 1 to 3 mm are obtained through crushing and sieving. In the adsorption experiments, ultra-high purity CO2 (U-Sung, 99.999%) is utilized, and the molecular sieve particles undergo evacuation at temperatures between 200 and 250 °C prior to measurement.

2.2.2. Characterization

X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF, Bruker S4 pioneer, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used to determine the chemical composition of the gangue for quantitative analysis. The crystallinity of the samples was evaluated by physical phase retrieval on a Bruker D8-FOCUS type X-ray diffractometer with a scanning speed of 5°/min and a scanning angle of 5°~80°. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Gemini SEM 500, Hitachi, Japan) was used to observe the microstructure and surface morphology of the samples, and the microanalysis was determined by energy spectrum analysis (EDS). The specific surface area and pore size distribution of the samples were obtained using the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm at 77 K of liquid nitrogen temperature using Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The CO2 gas adsorption–desorption isotherms of 13-X molecular sieve were measured on a Quantachrome version 5.21 gas adsorption analyzer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Processing and Analysis of Raw Materials

3.1.1. Treatment of Raw Material Gangue

To enhance the crystallinity of the molecular sieve, coal gangue is initially crushed using a crusher and ball mill, followed by sieving through a 200 mesh sieve to obtain gangue powder. The primary components of the gangue are silicon and aluminum compounds, with negligible quantities of other compounds. Chemical composition analysis was conducted using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, Bruker S4 pioneer, Germany), revealing that the gangue is primarily composed of SiO2 and Al2O3, along with trace oxide impurities containing Ca, Mg, K, Fe, Na, and other elements, as well as some organic carbon (Table 1). The XRD pattern of the gangue indicates that its main mineral composition is quartz (Figure 2). Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images demonstrate that the raw material consists of irregular lumps or agglomerates with non-uniform particle size distribution and a significant presence of non-crystalline particulate matter on its surface.

3.1.2. Orthogonal Experimental Design for the Synthesis of 13-X Molecular Sieve

In this study, there are many factors affecting the preparation of a 13-X molecular sieve, and an orthogonal test can conduct a comprehensive experiment on the collocation between various levels of each factor, so an orthogonal test is chosen as the research method. After the preliminary exploration experiment, the influence factors and levels of the experiment were controlled at four factors and three levels, and the orthogonal table L9(34) was selected, as shown in Table 2 below.
This study explored the impact of four key factors, Si/Al ratio (PCG to NaAlO2 mass ratio), alkalinity (NaOH(aq) concentration), crystallization temperature, and hydrothermal time, on the crystallinity of gangue-based 13-X molecular sieve products. The synthesized samples were denoted as Y1, Y2–Y9, etc.

3.2. Evaluation of the Synthesized 13-X Zeolite

3.2.1. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The influence of the Si/Al molar ratio on the crystallization type of molecular sieve was examined. The coal gangue exhibits a high content of SiO2 and Al2O3, with an n(Si)/n(Al) ratio of 2.20. Given that the X-type molecular sieve is considered a low-silica molecular sieve, the raw coal gangue is well-suited for the synthesis of low-silica molecular sieve porous materials with high crystallinity. The XRD spectra of synthetic samples Y1-Y9 were compared with standard 13-X molecular sieve values (PDF#12–0246) (Figure 3). Samples Y7 and Y9 exhibited distinct peaks at 2ϴ of 6.090°, 9.998°, 11.696°, 15.424°, 20.073°, 23.310°, and 31.015°, indicating the presence of 13-X molecular sieve diffraction peaks. Other synthetic samples did not exhibit a 13-X molecular sieve, but the amorphous silicate content within the raw material system increased, and the quartz phase diminished as the reaction progressed. This transformation was due to the interaction of alkaline substances with the quartz crystalline phase on the gangue’s surface, leading to structural alterations. These findings underscore the significance of the SiO2 and Al2O3 ratio in the parent composition in determining the molecular sieve structure type.
The impact of alkali addition on the synthesized products was also analyzed, showing that the addition of an alkali source effectively disrupted the inert crystal structure of quartz in the gangue, enabling the dissolution of active silicoaluminate components. Alkalinity, determined by different alkali concentrations, significantly influenced the crystallinity of molecular sieves. In samples with a Si/Al molar ratio (PCG to NaAlO2 mass ratio = 6), varying NaOH solution concentrations (0.4, 0.5, and 0.3 mol·L–1) were tested. Samples Y7 and Y9, which exhibited the diffraction peaks of a standard 13-X molecular sieve, indicated that higher NaOH addition was not conducive to 13-X molecular sieve nucleation. An increase in alkalinity led to a gradual reduction in the diffraction intensity of the 13-X molecular sieve. Sample Y8 had excessively high alkalinity, resulting in a highly basic crystallization reaction process. Consequently, it hindered silicate ion polymerization and produced different structures. The synthesis of molecular sieves through alkali fusion and appropriate alkalinity adjustment treatments promoted the depolymerization of Si-Al-radical ions and facilitated zeolite grain formation and crystal growth. Different NaOH ratios yielded distinct crystal structures, with a material concentration of 0.3 mol·L–1 providing well-developed 13-X molecular sieves. This sufficient alkalinity promoted the uniform nucleation of pure 13-X zeolites and supplemented the sodium content in the molecular sieves.
The synthesis of molecular sieves involves a process of silica–aluminate precipitation in an alkali solution, and changes in crystallization temperature affect the interaction between silica–aluminate and [SiO2(OH)2]2– and [Al(OH)4]. To investigate the impact of different crystallization temperatures on the synthesis of 13-X molecular sieves, three series of syntheses were conducted at 80 °C, 100 °C, and 120 °C. As shown in Figure 3, when the crystallization temperature was set at 120 °C, the formation of crystals of other structures or impurities occurred, as evidenced by the absence of standard 13-X zeolite diffraction peaks and the appearance of different crystal structures. Consequently, 13-X zeolites could not be synthesized at this temperature. When the crystallization temperature was reduced to 80 °C and 100 °C, high-purity x-type zeolites were formed. Notably, 13-X zeolites synthesized at 80 °C exhibited higher efficiency, with sample Y9 approaching the relative crystallinity of standard 13-X. Therefore, considering energy conservation and maintaining the integrity of the 13-X molecular sieve’s crystal structure, 80 °C is more suitable for producing high-purity 13-X zeolites.
Hydrothermal time plays a role in the growth and formation of molecular sieve crystals, and different hydrothermal crystallization times can yield various crystal structures. The effect of hydrothermal time was studied in three series, 8 h, 10 h, and 12 h, to regulate the growth and formation of synthetic 13-X molecular sieves.
The XRD spectrum in Figure 3 reveals that at a crystallization time of 10 h, sample Y9 displayed the highest crystallinity of 13-X zeolite. Subsequently, the diffraction intensity of 13-X zeolite decreased beyond 10 h, suggesting the conversion of some X zeolites into more stable zeolites as a result of increased silicon dissolution during longer hydrothermal synthesis. Therefore, precise control of hydrothermal time is crucial in the synthesis of 13-X molecular sieves, with 10 h being considered the optimal duration for the formation of crystalline 13-X zeolites.
Taking into account the Si/Al molar ratio (PCG to NaAlO2 mass ratio = 6), a NaOH solution concentration of 0.3 mol·L–1, a crystallization temperature of 80 °C, and a hydrothermal time of 10 h, the best conditions for synthesized 13-X molecular sieves were achieved. The resulting product, Y9, exhibited sharp and complete characteristic peaks, minimal amorphous peaks, and a high degree of purity in its crystalline phase.

3.2.2. SEM-EDS Analysis

The electron microscope allows observation of the surface morphology and crystal size of molecular sieves, offering insights into crystal uniformity, the presence of heterocrystals, and the overall image quality. To study the crystal pattern variations, the synthesized product is initially gently ground, pretreated, gold-sprayed, and subjected to vacuum treatment. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the XRD spectrum of the synthesized sample Y1-Y9 is compared with the standard 13-X molecular sieve value (PDF#12-0246), as shown in Figure 3. The peaks of Y7 and Y9 at the 2° curves of 6.090°, 9.998°, 11.696°, 15.424°, 20.073°, 23.310°, and 31.015° indicate that the synthesis products have 13-X molecular sieve diffraction peaks at this point. Secondly, the surface morphology and crystal size of the synthesized molecular sieve samples were observed by electron microscopy. The regular octahedral structure of the 13-X molecular sieve appeared in both the Y7 and Y9 samples, but due to the difference in the level of synthetic factors in the Y7 samples, other types of molecular sieve structures were generated. Therefore, Y7 was selected for comparison and discussion with the optimal group Y9. SEM and EDS patterns of the raw material gangue, synthesized sample Y7, and the best sample Y9 are presented in Figure 4. Figure 4a,b illustrate the microscopic morphology of raw coal gangue, displaying dark gray powder after calcination. The material exhibits various shapes and sizes of lamellar structures, with lamellae stacked together in a cascade arrangement, indicating inadequate crystallization. Figure 4c presents the EDS energy spectrum analysis of raw coal gangue, revealing the main characteristic peaks corresponding to elements that constitute the octahedral crystals of the 13-X molecular sieve. Figure 4d,e show the microscopic morphology of synthesized sample Y7, characterized by an absence of octahedral structure and irregular spherical crystal morphology with uniform particle size. This indicates that the synergistic effect of high alkalinity, a long hydrothermal time, and a high temperature is not conducive to the nucleation and crystal growth of the 13-X zeolite molecular sieve. Figure 4f displays the EDS spectrum analysis of the Y7 sample molecular sieve. In Figure 4g,h, the microscopic morphology of the best sample, Y9, reveals ortho-octahedral molecular sieve crystals with clear angles, uniform particle size and a regular overall shape [38]. The particle size is approximately 2 µm, and there is no fuzzy colloid in the electron microscope image. Figure 4i provides the EDS energy spectrum analysis of the Y9 sample, indicating that the synthesized product Y9 molecular sieve contains elements O, Na, Al, and Si with weight percentages of 35.60, 8.24, 12.05, and 17.38, respectively. The molar ratio of Si-Al is approximately 1.4, which is close to the theoretical formula of Na2O·Al2O3·2.5SiO2·6H2O. These findings affirm the high quality and crystalline purity of the synthesized products.

3.2.3. Specific Surface Area Analysis

The specific surface area is a crucial parameter for evaluating the adsorption capacity of molecular sieve porous materials. In general, a larger specific surface area indicates a stronger adsorption capacity. Table 3 presents the surface structure parameters of the coal gangue Y9 molecular sieve, with the BET method used to measure the surface area. The data in the table show that the BET-specific surface area of coal gangue is 2.04 m2/g, with almost no adsorption capacity. After the synthesis in the alkali fusion–hydrothermal system, sample Y9’s BET-specific surface area significantly increased to 377.02 m2/g, accompanied by a qualitative improvement. The average pore size reached 2.09 nm, approximately 185 times that of the original gangue. These results demonstrate that the experimentally synthesized 13-X molecular sieve exhibits a high BET-specific surface area. Figure 5 presents the N2 adsorption–desorption curve and pore size distribution of sample Y9, revealing increased adsorption with rising pressure. The adsorption–desorption isotherm curve resembles a typical Langmuir IV curve, indicating the presence of slit mesopores and a typical physical adsorption process. The pore size distribution of sample Y9 primarily centers on 38.8 nm mesopores, signifying a favorable pore structure. These findings confirm that the experimentally synthesized sample Y9 offers a high specific surface area and predominantly features physisorption, which is easily regenerated and recyclable, enhancing its ability to interact with adsorbents.

3.3. Measured Characteristics of CO2 Adsorption by Gangue-Based 13-X Molecular Sieve

Figure 6 displays a bar graph representing the adsorption capacity of the synthesized molecular sieve for CO2 at different temperatures. The gas adsorption process generally releases heat, making temperature a critical factor affecting molecular sieve gas adsorption. As depicted in Figure 6, the CO2 adsorption capacity of all the synthesized molecular sieve samples, particularly Y9, diminishes as the temperature rises. The maximum CO2 adsorption capacity of the 13-X molecular sieve is observed at 0 °C (273 K), reaching 1.82 mmol/g.
A number of adsorption models are commonly used to predict the adsorption of adsorbents at different pressures as a reference for further studies of the adsorption mechanism. In this study, the Langmuir Model and Dual-site Langmuir Model were used to fit the CO2 adsorption isotherm.
Langmuir Model:
q = q A b A p 1 + b A p
Dual-site Langmuir Model:
q =   q A b A p 1 + b A p + q B b B p 1 +   b B p
In Equations (1) and (2), q is the adsorption amount, mmol/g; p is the absolute pressure, kPa; qA and qB are the saturation adsorption amounts, mmol/g; bA and bB are the affinity constants, kPa.
Figure 7 illustrates the isothermal fitting curves for CO2 adsorption at various temperatures for the synthesized 13-X molecular sieve Y9, employing the Dual-site Langmuir Model for fitting. Table 4 presents the correlation coefficient values of both the Langmuir Model and the Dual-site Langmuir Model. It is evident that the Dual-site Langmuir Model offers a more accurate description of the variable pressure adsorption process for CO2 gas within the synthesized 13-X molecular sieve. As the pressure gradually increases, the two adsorption sites work synergistically, causing changes in their affinity effects. Additionally, due to the mesoporous structure of the synthesized 13-X molecular sieve, adsorption predominantly takes place within the mesopores at higher relative pressures. Inside the molecular sieve skeleton, cavities contain charge-compensating cations, resulting in the emergence of acidic sites. The negatively charged skeletal oxygen near these cations acts as a basic site, interacting with the permanent quadrupole moment in CO2 [35], leading to higher CO2 adsorption rates. Consequently, in conjunction with the sorption data, it was determined that continuous sorption testing at 0 °C was most suitable for various temperature conditions. In prior studies, gangue has been employed as a raw material for CO2 adsorbent synthesis, offering cost reductions and substantial environmental benefits. This suggests the potential utility of gangue-based 13-X molecular sieves for CO2 capture.
The effect of synthesized 13-X molecular sieves on CO2 adsorption performance at 25 °C was investigated at different adsorption pressures of 20 kPa, 40 kPa, 60 kPa, 80 kPa, and 100 kPa, respectively, as shown in Figure 8, which is the histogram of CO2 adsorption capacity at different adsorption pressures. It can be observed from the figure that the adsorption capacity of 13-X molecular sieves for CO2 showed an increasing trend with the increase of pressure. The adsorption capacity of the 13-X molecular sieve for CO2 increased from 1.04 mmol/g to 1.27 mmol/g for pressure from 20 kPa to 40 kPa and increased continuously with the pressure, and reached 1.58 mmol/g for the adsorption capacity at 100 kPa. The CO2 adsorption capacity of the 13-X zeolite showed a tendency to increase and then decrease with the increase of the pressure. This indicates that the larger the adsorption pressure, the greater the influence the 13-X molecular sieve has on the adsorption capacity, and this also shows a positive correlation trend. Secondly, when the pressure increases, the asymmetric vibration of Si-O and Al-O tetrahedra in the molecular sieve will be strengthened, which makes the asymmetric vibration of Si-O and Al-O tetrahedra in the molecular sieve more obvious. The gas and water will be discharged from the pores, thus enlarging the diameter of the pores and improving the adsorption capacity of the 13-X molecular sieve for CO2 gas.
In order to examine the CO2 adsorption capacity of competing adsorbents, the CO2 capture capacity of the synthesized 13-X molecular sieve was compared with other CO2 adsorbents reported in the literature in this study, and the results of the comparison are shown in Table 5. As can be seen from the data in Table 5, the CO2 capture capacity of the 13-X molecular sieve synthesized in this work is close to that of adsorbents reported in the literature [39] and exceeds that of many reported CO2 adsorbents, such as Hierarchical melamine resin sponges [40] and Amine-impregnated Silica foam [41].

4. Conclusions

The 13-X molecular sieve porous materials were synthesized by alkali melting and hydrothermal treatment using cheap and readily available solid waste-based coal gangue as a raw material, without adding any silicon or alumina sources. The effects of Si/Al, alkalinity, crystallization temperature, and hydrothermal time on the synthesis of the 13-X molecular sieve were investigated using the orthogonal experimental design. The prepared 13-X molecular sieve exhibited a highly crystalline pore structure with a BET-specific surface area of 377.02 m2/g, and it showed excellent CO2 capture capacity (CO2 adsorption capacity of 1.82 mmol/g) at 0 °C and 1 bar. The low cost and high value-added availability of coal gangue and the high CO2 capture performance of coal gangue-based 13-X molecular sieves indicated that the synthesis of 13-X zeolite for CO2 capture from gangue is an ideal resource utilization method for coal gangue that can be used in the future.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Y.L.; Resources, Y.G.; Data curation, S.L., B.X., H.H. and L.K.; Writing—original draft, D.Y.; Writing—review & editing, H.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported funded by the State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials (Grant No. 20232508). the Excellent Youth Science and Technology Fund Project of Xi’an University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 6310221009), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52172099), the Basic Research Plan of Natural Science of Shaanxi Province (No. 2020JQ-754).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegelman, R.L.; Kim, E.J.; Long, J.R. Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gayathri, R.; Mahboob, S.; Govindarajan, M.; Al-Ghanim, K.A.; Ahmed, Z.; Al-Mulhm, N.; Vodovnik, M.; Vijayalakshmi, S. A review on biological carbon sequestration: A sustainable solution for a cleaner air environment, less pollution and lower health risks. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qadir, S.; Su, H.; Li, D.; Gu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, S. Low-cost preferential different amine grafted silica spheres adsorbents for DAC CO2 removal. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 75, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Greer, K.; Zeller, D.; Woroniak, J.; Coulter, A.; Winchester, M.; Palomares, M.D.; Pauly, D. Global trends in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fuel combustion in marine fisheries from 1950 to 2016. Mar. Policy 2019, 107, 103382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jacobson, T.A.; Kler, J.S.; Hernke, M.T.; Braun, R.K.; Meyer, K.C.; Funk, W.E. Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hanna, R.; Abdulla, A.; Xu, Y.; Victor, D.G. Emergency deployment of direct air capture as a response to the climate crisis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Djalante, R. Key assessments from the IPCC special report on global warming of 1.5 C and the implications for the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. Prog. Disaster Sci. 2019, 1, 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wadi, B.; Golmakani, A.; Manovic, V.; Nabavi, S.A. Effect of combined primary and secondary amine loadings on the adsorption mechanism of CO2 and CH4 in biogas. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 130294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aaron, D.; Tsouris, C. Separation of CO2 from flue gas: A review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 321–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luzzi, E.; Aprea, P.; de Luna, M.S.; Caputo, D.; Filippone, G. Mechanically coherent zeolite 13X/Chitosan aerogel beads for effective CO2 capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 20728–20734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Drage, T.; Arenillas, A.; Smith, K.; Pevida, C.; Piippo, S.; Snape, C. Preparation of carbon dioxide adsorbents from the chemical activation of urea–formaldehyde and melamine–formaldehyde resins. Fuel 2007, 86, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lu, C.; Bai, H.; Wu, B.; Su, F.; Hwang, J.F. Comparative study of CO2 capture by carbon nanotubes, activated carbons, and zeolites. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 3050–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shang, S.; Tao, Z.; Yang, C.; Hanif, A.; Li, L.; Tsang, D.C.; Gu, Q.; Shang, J. Facile synthesis of CuBTC and its graphene oxide composites as efficient adsorbents for CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 393, 124666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, H.; La, P.; Yang, R.; Zhu, Z.; Liang, W.; Yang, B.; Li, A.; Deng, W. Innovative nanoporous carbons with ultrahigh uptakes for capture and reversible storage of CO2 and volatile iodine. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 321, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Przepiórski, J.; Czyżewski, A.; Pietrzak, R.; Toyoda, M.; Morawski, A.W. Porous carbon material containing CaO for acidic gas capture: Preparation and properties. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 263, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Y.; Ding, H.; Zhong, Q. Synthesis and characterization of MOF-aminated graphite oxide composites for CO2 capture. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 284, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, M.; Li, H.; Zhou, L.; Xing, R.; Zhang, J. Hierarchically porous graphene/ZIF-8 hybrid aerogel: Preparation, CO2 uptake capacity, and mechanical property. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, S.; Drese, J.H.; Jones, C.W. Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. ChemSusChem Chem. Sustain. Energy Mater. 2009, 2, 796–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Silva, J.A.; Schumann, K.; Rodrigues, A.E. Sorption and kinetics of CO2 and CH4 in binderless beads of 13X zeolite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 158, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dabbawala, A.A.; Ismail, I.; Vaithilingam, B.V.; Polychronopoulou, K.; Singaravel, G.; Morin, S.; Berthod, M.; Al Wahedi, Y. Synthesis of hierarchical porous Zeolite-Y for enhanced CO2 capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 303, 110261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, C.; Du, H.; Liu, J.; Kang, L.; Du, X.; Xi, X.; Ran, H. High-temperature stability of dielectric and energy-storage properties of weakly-coupled relaxor (1-x) BaTiO3-xBi (Y1/3Ti1/2)O3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 25029–25036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, R.R.; Pang, W.; Yu, J.H.; Huo, Q.S.; Chen, J.S. Chemistry-zeolites and porous materials. In Structural Analysis and Properties of Porous Materials Characterization; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2004; pp. 145–149. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ran, H.; Du, H.; Ma, C.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, D.; Xu, H. Effects of A/B-site Co-doping on microstructure and dielectric thermal stability of AgNbO3 ceramics. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2021, 13, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Feng, D.; Du, H.; Ran, H.; Lu, T.; Xia, S.; Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Ma, C. Antiferroelectric stability and energy storage properties of Co-doped AgNbO3 ceramics. J. Solid State Chem. 2022, 310, 123081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Serrano, D.P.; Escola, J.M.; Pizarro, P. Synthesis strategies in the search for hierarchical zeolites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 4004–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Deng, J.; Li, B.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, L.; Wang, C.P.; Lai-Wang, B.; Shu, C.M. Combustion properties of coal gangue using thermogravimetry–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 116, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, H.; Li, M.; Zheng, F.; Wang, J.; Chen, L.; Hu, P.; Zhen, Q.; Bashir, S.; Liu, J.L. Efficient removal of water pollutants by hierarchical porous zeolite-activated carbon prepared from coal gangue and bamboo. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 325, 129322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, Y.; Yan, K.; Cui, L.; Cheng, F. Improved extraction of alumina from coal gangue by surface mechanically grinding modification. Powder Technol. 2016, 302, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lü, Q.; Dong, X.; Zhu, Z.; Dong, Y. Environment-oriented low-cost porous mullite ceramic membrane supports fabricated from coal gangue and bauxite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 273, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yun, Y.; Gao, R.; Yue, H.; Liu, X.; Li, G.; Sang, N. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-containing soils from coal gangue stacking areas contribute to epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) modulation on cancer cell metastasis. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 580, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, J.; Wang, J. Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 117946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qiu, G.; Luo, Z.; Shi, Z.; Ni, M. Utilization of coal gangue and copper tailings as clay for cement clinker calcinations. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2011, 26, 1205–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, X.; Lu, W.X.; Zhao, H.Q.; Yang, Q.C.; Yang, Z.P. Potential ecological risk assessment and prediction of soil heavy-metal pollution around coal gangue dump. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 14, 1599–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marchon, D.; Kawashima, S.; Bessaies-Bey, H.; Mantellato, S.; Ng, S. Hydration and rheology control of concrete for digital fabrication: Potential admixtures and cement chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 112, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, W.; Du, H.; Kang, L.; Du, X.; Shi, Y.; Qiang, X.; Li, H.; Zhao, J. Microstructure evolution and improved permeability of ceramic waste-based bricks. Materials 2022, 15, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Valencia, L.; Rosas, W.; Aguilar-Sanchez, A.; Mathew, A.P.; Palmqvist, A.E. Bio-based micro-/meso-/macroporous hybrid foams with ultrahigh zeolite loadings for selective capture of carbon dioxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 40424–40431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jiang, N.; Shen, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, D.; Tang, Z.; Li, G.; Fu, B. CO2 capture from dry flue gas by means of VPSA, TSA and TVSA. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 35, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, C.; Alshameri, A.; Yan, C.; Qiu, X.; Wang, H.; Ma, Y. Characteristics and evaluation of synthetic 13X zeolite from Yunnan’s natural halloysite. J. Porous Mater. 2013, 20, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hedin, N.; Chen, L.J.; Laaksonen, A. Sorbents for CO2 capture from flue gas—Aspects from materials and theoretical chemistry. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 1819–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilke, A.; Weber, J. Hierarchical nanoporous melamine resin sponges with tunable porosity—Porosity analysis and CO2 sorption properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5226–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Han, Y.; Hwang, G.; Kim, H.; Haznedaroglu, B.Z.; Lee, B. Amine-impregnated millimeter-sized spherical silica foams with hierarchical mesoporous–macroporous structure for CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.J.; He, P.Y.; Li, C.J. Synthesis, characterization and modification of monolithic ZSM-5 from geopolymer for CO2 capture: Experiments and DFT calculations. Energy 2019, 179, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Q.; He, P.; Qian, X.; Fei, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; Tang, J.; Cui, M.; Qiao, X.; Shi, Y. Enhanced CO2 adsorption performance on hierarchical porous ZSM-5 zeolite. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 13933–13941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of preparation of gangue-based 13-X molecular sieve.
Figure 1. Flow chart of preparation of gangue-based 13-X molecular sieve.
Coatings 13 01886 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern and FESEM pattern of coal gangue.
Figure 2. XRD pattern and FESEM pattern of coal gangue.
Coatings 13 01886 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the synthesized samples Y1–Y9 and 13-X standard card (bottom of the image).
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the synthesized samples Y1–Y9 and 13-X standard card (bottom of the image).
Coatings 13 01886 g003
Figure 4. SEM patterns of raw coal gangue, (a,b); Y7 sample, (d,e); Y9 sample, (g,h). EDS patterns of raw coal gangue, (c); Y7 sample, (f); and Y9 sample, (i).
Figure 4. SEM patterns of raw coal gangue, (a,b); Y7 sample, (d,e); Y9 sample, (g,h). EDS patterns of raw coal gangue, (c); Y7 sample, (f); and Y9 sample, (i).
Coatings 13 01886 g004
Figure 5. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm curve and pore size distribution of Y9 molecular sieve.
Figure 5. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm curve and pore size distribution of Y9 molecular sieve.
Coatings 13 01886 g005
Figure 6. Column chart of CO2 adsorption capacity of synthesized molecular sieve at different temperatures.
Figure 6. Column chart of CO2 adsorption capacity of synthesized molecular sieve at different temperatures.
Coatings 13 01886 g006
Figure 7. CO2 adsorption isothermal fitting curves of synthesized 13-X molecular sieve Y9 at different temperatures and Dual-site Langmuir Model fitting.
Figure 7. CO2 adsorption isothermal fitting curves of synthesized 13-X molecular sieve Y9 at different temperatures and Dual-site Langmuir Model fitting.
Coatings 13 01886 g007
Figure 8. Column chart of CO2 adsorption capacity under different adsorption pressures.
Figure 8. Column chart of CO2 adsorption capacity under different adsorption pressures.
Coatings 13 01886 g008
Table 1. Chemical composition of coal gangue.
Table 1. Chemical composition of coal gangue.
OxideCaOMgOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3TiO2K2ONa2OLoss
wt%0.821.5761.3923.764.140.792.821.622.11
Table 2. Orthogonal experimental scheme.
Table 2. Orthogonal experimental scheme.
Serial NumberInfluence Factor
Si/Al (PCG/NaAlO2 Mass Ratio)Alkalinity
(CNaOH(aq))/mol·L−1
Crystallization Temperature/°CHydrothermal Time/h
Y140.31008
Y240.412010
Y340.58012
Y450.510010
Y550.312012
Y650.4808
Y760.410012
Y860.51208
Y960.38010
Table 3. Surface structural parameters of gangue, Y9 molecular sieves, and commercial 13-X molecular sieves.
Table 3. Surface structural parameters of gangue, Y9 molecular sieves, and commercial 13-X molecular sieves.
SampleBET-Specific Surface Area (m2/g)Average Pore Size (Å)Pore Volume (m3/g)
Coal Gangue2.04
Y9377.0220.870.20
Commercial 13-X molecular sieve523.8818.62
Table 4. Isothermal model coefficients of CO2 adsorption at different temperatures.
Table 4. Isothermal model coefficients of CO2 adsorption at different temperatures.
Temperature (°C)Langmuir ModelDual-Site Langmuir Model
qA (mmol/g)bA (kPa−1)R2qA (mmol/g)bA (kPa−1)qB (mmol/g)bB (kPa−1)R2
01.910.130.97991.480.040.640.840.9995
251.650.100.97961.290.030.650.480.9994
450.980.060.99880.490.060.490.060.9988
Table 5. Comparison of CO2 trapping capacity of different adsorbents.
Table 5. Comparison of CO2 trapping capacity of different adsorbents.
SampleAdsorption Temperature (°C)Adsorption Capacity (mmol/g)References
zeolite 13-X01.8Present work
Hierarchical melamine
resin sponges
01.7[40]
β-zeolite301.8[39]
Monolithic Ni/ZSM-5352.4[42]
Amine-impregnated
Silica foam
251.48[41]
ZSM-502.37[43]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yi, D.; Du, H.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, B.; Huang, H.; Kang, L. Study on Green Controllable Preparation of Coal Gangue-Based 13-X Molecular Sieves and Its CO2 Capture Application. Coatings 2023, 13, 1886. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13111886

AMA Style

Yi D, Du H, Li Y, Gao Y, Liu S, Xu B, Huang H, Kang L. Study on Green Controllable Preparation of Coal Gangue-Based 13-X Molecular Sieves and Its CO2 Capture Application. Coatings. 2023; 13(11):1886. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13111886

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yi, Dawei, Huiling Du, Yefei Li, Yimin Gao, Sifan Liu, Boyang Xu, Haoqi Huang, and Le Kang. 2023. "Study on Green Controllable Preparation of Coal Gangue-Based 13-X Molecular Sieves and Its CO2 Capture Application" Coatings 13, no. 11: 1886. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13111886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop