Next Article in Journal
Microstructure and Stress of Ni/C Multilayer Films Prepared by Reactive Sputtering
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Properties of a Plasma-Sprayed Fe-Cr-B-C Coating
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/coatings12111717
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Simple Fabrication Method for Mechanically Robust Superhydrophobic 2024 Aluminum Alloy Surfaces

by
Li-Mei Shan
*,
Guo-Biao Liu
,
Hua Tang
,
Zhi-Hong Li
and
Ju-Ying Wu
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan Engineering Technical College, Deyang 618000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(11), 1717; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111717
Submission received: 4 June 2022 / Revised: 30 October 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Corrosion and Protection of Metallic Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The mechanical durability of a superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surface is an important indicator of its practical use. Herein, we propose a strategy to prepare a superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface with highly enhanced mechanical durability by using a two-step chemical etching method, using a NaOH solution as the etchant in step one and a Na2CO3 solution as the etchant in step two. Robust mechanical durability was studied by static contact angle tests before and after an abrasion test, potentiodynamic polarization measurements after an abrasion test and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests after an abrasion test. Furthermore, the mechanism for enhanced mechanical durability was investigated through scanning of electron microscopy images, energy-dispersive X-ray spectra, Fourier transform infrared spectra and X-ray photoelectron spectra. The testing results indicate that a hierarchical rough surface consisting of regular micro-scale dents and some nano-scale fibers in the micro-scale dents, obtained with the two-step chemical etching method, contributes to highly enhanced mechanical durability. Meanwhile, the as-prepared superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface retained a silvery color instead of the black shown on the superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface prepared by a conventional one-step chemical etching method using NaOH solution as the etchant.

1. Introduction

Due to the advantages of low specific weight, high specific strength, excellent thermal conductivity and low cost, aluminum alloys have been widely applied in many fields, such as architecture, traffic, industry and household items [1]. However, aluminum alloys are easily corroded in environments containing chloride ions (for example, seawater) because their corrosion resistance becomes poor in those environments [2]. To enhance corrosion resistance of aluminum alloys, many types of surface modification methods based on aluminum-alloy substrates have been developed [3]. Preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces on aluminum-alloy substrates is a promising surface modification method to enhance corrosion resistance of aluminum alloys because those superhydrophobic surfaces can minimize the contact area between the corrosive solution and the surface of aluminum alloys [4,5]. However, it is difficult to obtain a mechanically robust superhydrophobic surface based on aluminum-alloy substrates. Therefore, research about enhancing mechanical durability of superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces attracts great attention [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
In general, a two-step methodology including fabrication of a rough surface consisting of micro/nano structures and chemical modification using some low-surface-energy materials has been widely used to create superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces [4,5,16]. Because a rough surface is critical to superhydrophobicity and mechanical durability of superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces, many approaches, such as laser texture [6,7,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], boiling-water treatment [30,31,32], electrodeposition [8,33,34,35], a combination of micromilling and grinding [36], hydrothermal synthesis [9,10], spin coating [37], anodizing [38,39,40], a combination of white-light interferometry and chemical etching [11], a combination of laser texture and boiling-water treatment [41], a combination of boiling-water treatment and chemical etching [42] and chemical etching by itself [12,13,14,15,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63], have been developed to construct rough surfaces on aluminum-alloy substrates. Among these approaches, chemical etching has been highlighted on account of its low cost and high efficiency. Furthermore, several kinds of chemicals, including acid [12,13,14,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,52,53], salt [50,51] and alkali [15,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64] solutions, have been widely used as etchants. Among these etchants, alkali solution is preferable because it is more beneficial for the environment.
Due to its low cost, NaOH solution is widely used as the alkali chemical etchant for preparing superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces. For example, Guo et al. prepared superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surfaces by using 1 mol L−1 NaOH solution as the chemical etchant and perfluorononane (C9F20) and poly (dimethylsiloxane) vinyl terminated (PDMSVT) as low-surface-energy materials for the first time [60]. Yang et al. made a full investigation of influence of NaOH-solution etching temperature on morphologies and superhydrophobicities of superhydrophobic 3003 aluminum alloy surfaces. They drew a conclusion that a high etching temperature of NaOH solution is necessary to fabricate a rough surface with micro/nano structures and a superhydrophobic 3003 aluminum alloy surface [62]. Cho et al. prepared superhydrophobic pure aluminum alloy surfaces by using 0.05 mol L−1 NaOH solution at 80 °C as the chemical etchant [15]. As-prepared superhydrophobic pure aluminum alloy surfaces showed relatively robust mechanical durability. Nevertheless, in our preliminary experiment, we found that the superhydrophobic surface on a 2024 aluminum-alloy substrate prepared by the one-step chemical etching method using NaOH solution as the etchant had two shortcomings. First, the superhydrophobic surface on 2024 aluminum-alloy substrate prepared by the one-step chemical etching method using NaOH solution as the etchant presented an undesirable black color. In addition, the as-prepared black superhydrophobic surface on the 2024 aluminum-alloy substrate showed poor mechanical durability. In this work, to prepare a mechanically robust non-black superhydrophobic surface on 2024 aluminum-alloy substrate, a two-step chemical etching method using a NaOH solution as the etchant in step one and a Na2CO3 solution as the etchant in step two is presented for the first time. Meanwhile, the chemical etching mechanism of the two-step chemical etching method is proposed. Furthermore, the reasons for improved mechanical durability of the as-prepared non-black superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The necessary 2024 aluminum alloy sheets with a size of 20 × 20 × 4 mm3 each were purchased from Shanghai Yunxian Metal Materials Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). and used as substrates. The chemical composition is shown in Table 1. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), hydrochloric acid (HCl), stearic acid (C18H36O2), acetone (CH3COCH3) and ethanol (C2H5OH) were purchased from Chengdu Kelong Chemical Co. Ltd (Chengdu, China). These chemical reagents were analytical grade.

2.2. Preparation of the Superhydrophobic 2024 Aluminum Alloy Surface

Superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surfaces were acquired using a two-step methodology including fabrication of a rough surface using a two-step chemical etching method and chemical modification with stearic acid. A schematic diagram of preparation of a superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface is shown in Figure 1. First, a pre-treatment was conducted. The 2024 aluminum alloy sheets were polished using SiC abrasive papers of 600# and 1000#. The polished sheets were ultrasonically cleaned using ethanol and degreased using acetone. Second, a two-step chemical etching method was carried out to create a rough surface with hierarchical micro/nano structures. In order to create micrometer scale structures on the 2024 aluminum alloy surface, the degreasedsheets were immersed into a NaOH solution of 1 mol L−1 for 30 min at 25 °C. Then, the sheets were washed using 1 mol L−1 HCl solution and deionized water, respectively. To create nano structures, the primary etched sheets were immersed into a Na2CO3 solution of 0.1 mol L−1 for 2 min at 25 °C. Finally, chemical modification of sheets with rough surfaces was conducted. The etched sheets were immersed in an ethanol solution with 0.05 mol L−1 stearic acid for 30 min at 25 °C. Afterwards, the chemical modified sheets were dried at 80 °C in an oven.
For comparison, another type of superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface was obtained using a two-step method including fabrication of a rough surface using a one-step chemical etching method and chemical modification with stearic acid. First, a pre-treatment was conducted. The 2024 aluminum alloy sheets were polished using SiC abrasive papers of 600# and 1000#. The polished sheets were ultrasonically cleaned using ethanol and degreased using acetone. Second, a one-step chemical etching method was carried out to create rough surfaces. The degreased sheets were immersed into a NaOH solution of 0.25 mol L−1 for 5 min at 90 °C. Then, the sheets were washed using deionized water. Finally, chemical modification of sheets with rough surfaces was conducted. The etched sheets were immersed into an ethanol solution with 0.05 mol L−1 stearic acid for 30 min at 25 °C. Afterwards, the chemical modified sheets were dried at 80 °C in an oven.

2.3. Characterisation of As-Prepared Superhydrophobic Surface

Water contact angles were obtained through the sessile drop method using a contact angle goniometer (DSA100, Kruss, Germany). Morphologies of samples were observed on a scanning electron microscope (Gemini SEM 300, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Compositions of samples were studied using energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra obtained with an EDX spectrometer (Aztec X-MAX80, Oxford, UK), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra obtained with an FTIR spectrophotometer (Nicolet Is5, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in the range 500 to 4000 cm−1 and X-ray photoelectron spectra obtained with an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Escalab 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Overview spectra (from 0 to 1350 eV) were recorded using Al Kα radiation (hv = 1486.6 eV) and binding energies were calibrated based on 284.8 eV.
Abrasion tests of as-prepared samples were performed with the following steps: The testing sample was placed on a SiC abrasive paper of 800#. The superhydrophobic surface of the testing sample faced the abrasive paper. Meanwhile, an iron block was loaded on the testing sample. The testing sample, with a load of 0.03 kg cm−2, was moved in one direction with 5 mm s−1 at two strokes of 15 cm.
Potentiodynamic polarization measurements were carried out on an electrochemical workstation (CHI660D, Shanghai CH Instruments, Shanghai, China) using a three-electrode system at room temperature. The as-prepared sample was used as a working electrode. A platinum sheet was used as a counter electrode. An Ag/AgCl/saturated KCl electrode was used as a reference electrode. To realize stable open-circuit potential before collection of potentiodynamic polarization data, three electrodes were immersed in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution for 30 min. Potentiodynamic polarization curves were achieved at stable open-circuit potential and at a scanning rate of 1 mV s−1. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were also carried out on the CHI660D electrochemical workstation. EIS curves were acquired at frequencies in a range of 100 kHz to 10 mHz.

3. Results and Discussion

Because water repellency was not the main focus in this study, only static water contact angles were obtained. SEM images and static water contact angles of the samples treated at different conditions are demonstrated in Figure 2a–g,a′–g′. Figure 2a–e demonstrates morphologies and contact angles of samples treated at various conditions using the two-step chemical etching method. As shown in Figure 2b,b′, the NaOH-etched sample at 25 °C presented a rough surface with irregular micro-scale particles, cracks and irregular nano-scale fibers on the surface of the micro-scale particles, which is in accord with the results in the previous literature [60,62]. Furthermore, as shown in the inset of Figure 2b, the NaOH-etched sample at 25 °C showed a black surface, which was not observed in other types of NaOH-solution-etched aluminum alloy surfaces or documented in the previous literature [15,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. As shown in Figure 2c, the NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C after HCl washing presented a relatively regular rough surface with regular micro-scale dents. The inset of Figure 2c presents a silvery white surface, indicating removal of the black substance. As shown in Figure 2d,d′, after Na2CO3-etching, the Na2CO3-etched sample presented a relatively regular rough surface with regular micro-scale dents and some nano-scale fibers in the micro-scale dents. The inset of Figure 2d also shows a silvery white surface. As shown in Figure 2e,e′, the stearic-acid-treated sample presented a similar, relatively regular rough surface with regular micro-scale dents. The nano-scale fibers in Figure 2d′ turned into nano-scale grids. The inset of Figure 2e also shows a silvery white surface. Figure 2f,f′,g,g′ demonstrates the morphologies of the samples prepared using the one-step chemical etching method. As shown in Figure 2f,g, samples prepared using the one-step chemical etching method presented a rough surface with irregular micro-scale particles and cracks, which is in accord with the results in the previous literature [57,60]. However, as shown in the insets of Figure 2f,g, the samples showed a black surface: a result that was not documented in the previous literature [15,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. As shown in the insets of Figure 2e,e′,g,g′ and Table 2, both stearic-acid-treated samples had good superhydrophobicity, with a contact angle of over 160°. The regular rough surface of the sample prepared using the two-step chemical etching method was expected to facilitate robust mechanical durability for the as-prepared superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surface.
The compositions of the samples treated at different conditions were characterized by conduction of EDX measurements. As shown in Figure 3, along with the Cu, Mn, Mg, Fe and Si elements, the O and C element were present on the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3-etching. The presence of the C element can be ascribed to chemical modification with stearic acid. Table 3 exhibits chemical compositions of samples treated at different conditions. The content of the O element for the Na2CO3-etched sample afterNaOH etching was higher than that of the pristine sample, indicating oxidation of some metal elements. The conclusion was further verified by the following XPS analyses.
XPS spectra were obtained to further study chemical compositions of samples treated at different conditions. Figure 4a shows the survey of XPS spectra. In XPS spectra of the stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching and of the stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C, characteristic peaks of Al and Cu for both stearic-acid-treated samples are clearly present, indicating a thin superhydrophobic film for both stearic-acid-treated samples. High-resolution spectra of the Cu and Al elements are shown in Figure 4b,c. In Figure 4b, the 933.6 eV peaks for the untreated sample and the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching can mainly be ascribed to 2p 3/2 peaks of Cu, which was deduced based on the results in the previous literature [64] and the silvery color of the samples. The 934.8 eV peak of the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C can mainly be ascribed to 2p 3/2 peaks of CuO, which was deduced based on the results in the previous literature [65] and the black color of the sample. The result of the high-resolution XPS spectra of Cu is in agreement with that of the chemical composition change detected by EDX mapping. In Figure 4c, the 72.8 eV peak of the untreated sample can be ascribed to 2p 3/2 peaks of Al, and the 74.8 eV peak can be ascribed to 2p 3/2 peaks of Al2O3 [65]. The 72.8 eV peak of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching can be ascribed to 2p 3/2 peaks of Al, and the 74.4 eV peak can be ascribed to 2p 3/2 peaks of Al(OH)3. The 74.4 eV peak of the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C can be ascribed to 2p 3/2 peak of Al(OH)3 [55]. The result of the high-resolution XPS spectra of Al is also in agreement with that of the chemical composition change detected by EDX mapping.
Deduced from analyses of SEM images, SEM-EDX mapping and XPS spectra, the chemical etching mechanism of the two-step chemical etching method can be described as the following equations. The NaOH solution etching process can be described by Equations (2)–(6). The HCl solution washing process can be described by Equations (7) and (8). The Na2CO3 solution etching process can be described by Equations (9)–(11). Due to the generation of CO2 in the Na2CO3 solution etching process, the reaction between copper and NaOH was restrained. Therefore, the Na2CO3-etched aluminum alloy and the stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching still showed a silvery white surface.
2Al + 2NaOH + 2H2O → 2NaAlO2 + 3H2
NaAlO2 + H2O → NaOH + Al(OH)3
2Al(OH)3 → Al2O3 + 3H2O
2Cu + 4NaOH + O2 → 2Na2CuO2 + 2H2O
NaCuO2 + 2H2O → 2NaOH + Cu(OH)2
2Cu(OH)2 → 2CuO + 2H2O
Al2O3 + 6HCl → 2AlCl3 + 3H2O
CuO + 2HCl → 2CuCl2 + H2O
2Al + Na2CO3 + 3H2O → 2NaAlO2 + 3H2 + CO2
NaAlO2 + H2O → NaOH + Al(OH)3
2Al(OH)3 → Al2O3 + 3H2O
FTIR spectra were obtained to investigate the chemical functional group and chemical structure of samples treated at different conditions. Figure 5 shows the FTIR spectra of the untreated aluminum alloy, the stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching and the stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C. The peaks in the FTIR spectrum of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching are much weaker than those in the FTIR spectrum of the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C, which indicates a thinner superhydrophobic film on the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching. This result is in accord with that observed in the SEM images in Figure 2e,e′,g,g′. The broad peak at 3400 cm−1 can be ascribed to the –OH band of Al(OH)3 [54]. The peaks at 2915 and 2847 cm−1 are attributed to the C–H and –CH2 bands [58,62], respectively. The peak at 1586 cm−1 is attributed to the –COOAl band [58]. The presence of –OH, C–H, –CH2 and –COOAl bands verifies successful chemical modification with stearic acid on etched aluminum-alloy substrates. The peaks at 1410 and 1360 cm−1 are attributed to the –AlO band [62]. Furthermore, the peaks at 717, 554 and 405 cm−1 are attributed to the Al–O band [58,62]. The weak peaks at 3400, 717, 554 and 405 cm−1 for stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching indicate a thin Al(OH)3 film, which is also observed in the SEM image in Figure 2d,d′.
Digital images of surfaces on stearic-acid-treated samples after Na2CO3 etching and stearic-acid-treated samples after NaOH etching at 90 °C before and after abrasion tests were obtained to investigate mechanical durability. As shown in Figure 6a,b, the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching presented a silvery color, and the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after the abrasion test showed a similar color. However, as shown in Figure 6c,d, the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C presented a black color and the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test showed a light gray color. Figure 6e,f show SEM images of surfaces on the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3-etching after the abrasion test and on the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test. As shown in Figure 6e,f, the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test showed a severely broken surface. As listed in Table 2, the static contact angle changed from 164.7° to 133.9° after the abrasion test. Variation of the water contact angle for the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C was 30.8°. In contrast to the severely broken surface of the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test, the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after the abrasion test showed a relatively slightly broken surface, which consisted of some slight broken micro-scale dents and intact nano-scale fibers in the micro-scale dents. As listed in Table 2, the static contact angle changed from 161.7° to 144.6° after the abrasion test. Variation of the water contact angle for the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching was 17.1°, which is bigger than the 10.7° variation of water contact angle for superhydrophobic surfaces on 1060 aluminum-alloy substrates in the previous literature [66]. This can be ascribed to the different aluminum-alloy substrates. In contrast to the severely broken surface and big variation of the static contact angle for the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C, the slightly broken surface and smaller variation of the static contact angle for the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching indicated highly improved mechanical durability of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching.
To further confirm highly improved mechanical durability of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching, the anti-corrosive properties of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3-etching after the abrasion test and of the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test were investigated via potentiodynamic polarization curves as well as corrosion current density (icorr), corrosion potential (Ecorr) and polarization resistance (Rp). Potentiodynamic polarization curves are shown in Figure 7. Corresponding data are listed in Table 4. As listed in Table 4, the values of icorr and Rp for the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after the abrasion test were 0.15 μA cm−2 and 268.7 kΩ cm2, respectively. However, the values of icorr and Rp for the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test were 0.68 μA cm−2 and 35.2 kΩ cm2, respectively. The smaller icorr value and bigger Rp value for the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after the abrasion test indicate better corrosion resistance, which verifies highly improved mechanical durability of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching.
To further confirm highly improved mechanical durability of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching, EIS measurements were taken to study the anti-corrosive properties of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3-etching after the abrasion test and of the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test. Nyquist plots, presenting two semicircles, are shown in Figure 8a. The smaller semicircle at high frequency represents resistance of the superhydrophobic thin films (RSH). The second large semicircle represents charge-transfer resistance (RctSH) of the double layer at the interface between the superhydrophobic surface and the salt solution. The Nyquist plots can be fitted to the equivalent electrical circuit with two CPEs shown in Figure 8b [58,62]. In the equivalent electrical circuit, Rs is resistance of the solution. RSH represents resistance of the superhydrophobic thin films. CPESH is the constant phase element associated with the dielectric nature of the superhydrophobic film. RctSH represents charge-transfer resistance of the double layer at the interface between the superhydrophobic surface and the salt solution. CPEctSH is the constant phase element associated with the double layer at the interface between the superhydrophobic film surface and the salt solution. The RSH and RctSH values of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after the abrasion test were 28.32 and 112.06 kΩ cm2, respectively. Nevertheless, the RSH and RctSH values of the stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after the abrasion test were 12.77 and 45.49 kΩ cm2, respectively. The much larger RSH and RctSH values of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after the abrasion test indicate a better anti-corrosive property. This result is in agreement with that obtained from potentiodynamic polarization measurements and is shown in Figure 7 and listed in Table 4.

4. Conclusions

In this work, amechanically robust non-black superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface was successfully prepared by a two-step chemical etching method, using NaOH solution as the etchant of step one and Na2CO3 solution as the etchant of step two. The variation of static contact angles for the as-prepared non-black superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface before and after abrasion test was 17.1° while that of the black superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface prepared by the conventional one-step chemical etching method using NaOH solution as the etchant was 30.8°. The improved mechanical durability of the as-prepared non-black superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface can be ascribed to the rough surface with relatively regular micro-scale dents and some nano-scale fibers in the micro-scale dents, which was confirmed by SEM observation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, L.-M.S. and G.-B.L.; software, H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, L.-M.S. and G.-B.L.; writing—review and editing, H.T. and Z.-H.L.; project administration, L.-M.S.; acquisition, J.-Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No.: 2021YFG0283), the Deyang Science and Technology Program (No.: 2020SZZ046) and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Engineering Technical College (No.: YJ2020KJ-07).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors, L.-M.S., upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Georgantzia, E.; Gkantou, M.; Kamaris, G.S. Aluminium alloys as structural material: A review of research. Eng. Struct. 2021, 227, 111372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Canepa, E.; Stifanese, R.; Merotto, L.; Traverso, P. Corrosion behaviour of aluminium alloys in deep-sea environment: A review and the KM3NeT test results. Mar. Struct. 2018, 59, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Critchlow, G.W.; Brewis, D.M. Review of surface pretreatments for aluminium alloys. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1996, 16, 255–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vazirinasab, E.; Jafari, R.; Momen, G. Application of superhydrophobic coatings as a corrosion barrier: A review. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 34, 40–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ran, M.R.; Zheng, W.Y.; Wang, H.M. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces for corrosion protection: A review. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sataeva, N.E.; Boinovich, L.B.; Emelyanenko, K.A.; Domantovsky, A.G.; Emelyanenko, A.M. Laser-assisted processing of aluminum alloy for the fabrication of superhydrophobic coatings withstanding multiple degradation factors. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 397, 125993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Milles, S.; Dahms, J.; Soldera, M.; Lasagni, A.F. Stable superhydrophobic aluminium surfaces based on laser-fabricated hierarchical textures. Materials 2021, 14, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.J.; Yin, S.H.; Luo, H. Fabrication of robust superhydrophobic Ni-SiO2 composite coatings on aluminium alloy surfaces. Vacuum 2020, 181, 109674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, L.Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, S.R. Facile fabrication and evaluation of self-healing Zn-Al layered double hydroxide superhydrophobic coating on aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 14803–14820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, G.; Liu, E.Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, L.Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Yu, S.R.; Wang, B.Y.; Yang, X.Z. Preparation of gahnite (ZnAl2O4) superhydrophobic coating on aluminium alloy with self-healing and high stability properties. Colloid Surface A 2022, 634, 127977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, R.Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Qin, N.; Mo, J.L.; Pan, Y.J.; Luo, D.B. Robust superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces with anti-icing ability, thermostability, and mechanical durability. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 147, 105745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barthwal, S.; Lim, S.H. Robust and chemically stable superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surface with enhanced corrosion resistance properties. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2020, 7, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cui, C.Y.; Cao, Y.F.; Qi, B.J.; Wei, J.J.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Y. Convenient and large-scale fabrication of cost-effective superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surface with excellent reparability. Langmuir 2021, 37, 7810–7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, S.; Wu, R.M.; Jiang, H.Y.; Yuan, Z.Q.; Chen, Q.H. Preparation and characterization of superhydrophobic silane-based multilayer surface coatings on aluminum surface. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 31, 3611–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cho, H.D.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, C.W.; Hwang, W.B. A simple fabrication method for mechanically robust superhydrophobic surface by hierarchical aluminum hydroxide structures. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, 762–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, D.W.; Wang, L.T.; Qian, H.C.; Li, X.G. Superhydrophobic surfaces for corrosion protection: A review of recent progresses and future directions. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2016, 13, 11–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Balitskii, O.I.; Pokhmurs’kii, V.I.; Tikhan, M.O. Laser treatment of plasma coatings. Sov. Mater. Sci. 1991, 27, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, C.; Ye, X.; Yang, X.H.; Yao, A.F.; Fan, Z.M. Preparation of a superhydrophobic aluminium alloy surface by uv-laser. Surf. Eng. 2020, 36, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guo, Y.G.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.C.; Xu, Q.; Geng, T. Wetting and tribological properties of superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces with different water adhesion. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 11658–11668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Milles, S.; Soldera, M.; Kuntze, T.; Lasagni, A.F. Characterization of self-cleaning properties on superhydrophobic aluminium surfaces fabricated by direct laser writing and direct laser interference patterning. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 525, 146818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Volpe, A.; Gaudiuso, C.; Di Venere, L.; Licciulli, F.; Giordano, F.; Ancona, A. Direct femtosecond laser fabrication of superhydrophobic aluminium alloy surfaces with anti-icing properties. Coatings 2020, 10, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kuznetsov, G.V.; Feoktistov, D.V.; Orlova, E.G.; Zykov, I.Y.; Bartuli, E.; Raudenský, M.; Zhuikov, A.V. Dynamic characteristics of water spreading over laser-textured aluminium alloy surfaces. Colloid Surf. A 2020, 603, 125253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Volpe, A.; Covella, S.; Gaudiuso, C.; Ancona, A. Improving the laser texture strategy to get superhydrophobicaluminum alloy surfaces. Coatings 2021, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tong, W.; Cui, L.L.; Qiu, R.X.; Yan, C.Q.; Liu, Y.T.; Wang, N.; Xiong, D.S. Laser textured dimple-patterns to govern the surface wettability of superhydrophobic aluminum plates. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 89, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lian, Z.X.; Xu, J.K.; Yu, P.; Yu, Z.J.; Wang, Z.B.; Yu, H.D. Oil repellent and corrosion resistance properties of superhydrophobic and superoleophobic aluminium alloy surfaces based on nanosecond laser textured treatment. Met. Mater. Int. 2020, 26, 1603–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zaitsev, D.A.; Batishcheva, K.A.; Kuznetsov, G.V.; Orlova, E.G. Prediction of water droplet behavior on aluminum alloy surfaces modified by nanosecond laser pulses. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 399, 126206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, X.K.; Xue, W.; Liu, W.W.; Zhu, D.H.; Cao, Y. Quadri-directionally anisotropic droplets sliding surfaces fabricated by selective laser texturing of aluminum alloy plates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 145406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rico, V.; Mora, J.; García, P.; Agüero, A.; Borrás, A.; González-Elipe, A.R.; López-Santos, C. Robust anti-icing superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces by grafting fluorocarbon molecular chains. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 21, 100815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qin, Y.K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Xu, N.; Zhu, X.C. Wettability, durability and corrosion properties of slippery laser-textured aluminum alloy surface under water impact. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 394, 125856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, L.B.; Sultonzoda, F.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.T.; Xue, F.X. Superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surface with excellent universality, corrosion resistance, and antifouling performance prepared without prepolishing. Mater. Corros. 2021, 72, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Z.B.; Xue, F.X.; Bai, W.X.; Shi, X.T.; Liu, Y.H.; Feng, L.B. Superhydrophobic surface on al alloy with robust durability and excellentself-healing performance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 410, 126952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ivvala, J.; Mandal, P.; Arora, H.S.; Grewal, H.S. Eco-friendly and facile fabrication of superhydrophobic aluminum alloy. Proc. IMechE Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2022, 236, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, N.; Sarkar, D.K.; Chen, X.G.; Tong, W.P. Corrosion performance of superhydrophobic nickel stearate/nickel hydroxide thin films on aluminum alloy by a simple one-step electrodeposition process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 302, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, S.Z.; Guo, Z.N.; Deng, Y.; Dong, H.S.; Li, X.Y.; Liu, J.W. Effect of pulse frequency on the onestep preparation of superhydrophobic surface by pulse electrodeposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 458, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. He, Z.H.; Zeng, Y.W.; Zhou, M.M.; Min, Y.L.; Shen, X.X.; Xu, Q.J. Superhydrophobic films with enhanced corrosion resistance and self-cleaning performance on an Al alloy. Langmuir 2021, 37, 524–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, H.D.; Zhang, X.R.; Wan, Y.L.; Xu, J.K.; Yu, Z.J.; Li, Y.Q. Superhydrophobic surface prepared by micromilling and grinding on aluminium alloy. Surf. Eng. 2016, 32, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sebastian, D.; Yao, C.W.; Lian, I. Multiscale corrosion analysis of superhydrophobic coating on 2024 aluminum alloy in a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. MRS Commun. 2020, 10, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.B.; Zeng, Y.X.; Duan, J.Z.; Hou, B.R. Fabrication of anodized superhydrophobic 5083 aluminum alloy surface for marine anti-corrosion and anti-biofouling. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2020, 38, 1246–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dong, X.J.; Meng, J.B.; Hu, Y.Z.; Wei, X.T.; Luan, X.S.; Zhou, H.A. Fabrication of self-cleaning superhydrophobic surfaces with improved corrosion resistance on 6061 aluminum alloys. Micromachines 2020, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, X.K.; Liu, X. Study on corrosion resistance of superhydrophobic film prepared on the surface of 2024 aluminum alloy. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2022, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tran, N.G.; Chun, D.M. Green manufacturing of extreme wettability contrast surfaces with superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic patterns on aluminium. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 297, 117245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khaskhoussi, A.; Calabrese, L.; Proverbio, E. Superhydrophobic self-assembled silane monolayers on hierarchical 6082 aluminum alloy for anti-corrosion applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, B.B.; Zeng, Y.X.; Wang, J.; Sun, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.T. Superamphiphobic aluminum alloy with low sliding angles and acid-alkali liquids repellency. Mater. Des. 2020, 188, 108479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shi, T.; Xue, S.; Ma, X.Y.; Peng, H.Q.; Du, J.; Zheng, B.Z.; Xia, Z.X. Fabrication of superhydrophobic micro nanostructured aluminium alloy surface via a cost effective processing using an ultra low concentration of fluoroalkylsilane. Appl. Phys. A-Mater. 2021, 27, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Peng, H.Q.; Li, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.B.; Wang, T.M.; Zheng, B.Z.; Zhou, H. Organic carbon dot coating for superhydrophobic aluminium alloy surfaces. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2021, 18, 861–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zheng, S.L.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.P.; Xiang, T.F.; Cao, Y.; Li, Q.L.; Chen, Z. A general strategy towards superhydrophobic self-cleaning and anti-corrosion metallic surfaces: An example with aluminum alloy. Coatings 2021, 11, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Noormohammed, S.; Sarkar, D.K. Rf-Sputtered Teflon®-modified superhydrophobic nanostructured titanium dioxide coating on aluminum alloy for icephobic applications. Coatings 2021, 11, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiao, X.Y.; Xie, W.; Ye, Z.H. Preparation of corrosion-resisting superhydrophobic surface on aluminium substrate. Surf. Eng. 2019, 35, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Barthwal, S.; Lim, S.H. A durable, fluorine-free, and repairable superhydrophobic aluminium surface with hierarchical micro/nanostructures and its application for continuous oil-water separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 618, 118716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Y.Q.; Si, W.T.; Gao, R.J. Facile preparation of superamphiphobic aluminum alloy surfaces and their corrosion resistance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 430, 127997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, F.Q.; Duan, S.W.; Wu, D.T.; Matsuda, K.J.; Wang, T.; Zou, Y. Facile etching fabrication of superhydrophobic 7055 aluminum alloy surface towards chloride environment anticorrosion. Corros. Sci. 2021, 182, 109262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peng, H.Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, T.M.; Li, L.; Xia, Z.X.; Du, J.; Zheng, B.Z.; Zhou, H.; Ye, L.W. Study on dynamics and freezing behaviors of water droplet on superhydrophobic aluminum surface. Appl. Phys. A-Mater. 2020, 126, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khajavian, E.; Attar, M.R.; Zahrani, E.M.; Liu, W.; Davoodi, A.; Hosseinpour, S. Tuning surface wettability of aluminum surface and its correlation with short and long term corrosion resistance in saline solutions. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 429, 127950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, L.J.; Feng, X.R.; Guo, M.X. Eco-friendly fabrication of superhydrophobic bayerite array on Al foil via an etching and growth process. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 25519–25525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, A.R.; Lee, C.; Kim, H.M.; Kim, J.W. Simple approach to superhydrophobic nanostructured Al for practical anti-frosting application based on enhanced self-propelled jumping droplets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 7206–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xie, D.G.; Li, W. A novel simple approach to preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces of aluminum alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 258, 1004–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guo, Z.G.; Zhou, F.; Hao, J.C.; Liu, W.M. Effects of system parameters on making aluminum alloy lotus. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 303, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, Y.; Sarkar, D.K.; Chen, X.G. Superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces prepared by chemical etching process and their corrosion resistance properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 356, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Saleema, N.; Sarkar, D.K.; Paynter, R.W.; Chen, X.G. Superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces by a novel one-step process. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 2500–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Guo, Z.G.; Zhou, F.; Hao, J.C.; Liu, W.M. Stable biomimetic super-hydrophobic engineering materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15670–15671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, J.H.; Puranik, R.; Shang, J.K.; Harris, D.M. Robust transferrable superhydrophobic surfaces. Surf. Eng. 2020, 36, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, H.J.; Gao, Y.M.; Frankel, G.S.; Qin, W.C.; Li, T.S.; Huang, Z.F.; Wu, L. Robust superhydrophobic surface with reinforced skeletons for corrosion protection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 499, 143916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rasitha, T.P.; Vanithakumari, S.C.; Krishna, D.N.G.; George, R.P.; Srinivasan, R.; Philip, J. Facile fabrication of robust superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces with enhanced corrosion protection and antifouling properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 162, 106560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lomga, J.; Varshney, P.; Nanda, D.; Satapathy, M.; Mohapatra, S.S.; Kumar, A. Fabrication of durable and regenerable superhydrophobic coatings with excellentself-cleaning and anti-fogging properties for aluminium surfaces. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 702, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cornette, P.; Zanna, S.; Seyeux, A.; Costa, D.; Marcus, P. The native oxide film on a model aluminium-copper alloy studied by XPS and ToF-SIMS. Corros. Sci. 2020, 174, 108837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xing, M.; Lei, X.P.; Guan, X.L.; Song, Y.Y.; Zhou, Y.L. Research on construction of superhydrophobic surface of aluminum alloy and its stability and self-cleaning performance. Surf. Technol. 2021, 50, 152–161. [Google Scholar]
Coatings 12 01717 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for preparing superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for preparing superhydrophobic 2024 aluminum alloy surface.
Coatings 12 01717 g001
Coatings 12 01717 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,a′) untreated aluminum alloy, (b,b′) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C after HCl washing, (c,c′) HCl-washed aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (d,d′) Na2CO3-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C, (e,e′) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (f,f′) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 90 °C and (g,g′) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C. The inset is the image of the contact angle.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,a′) untreated aluminum alloy, (b,b′) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C after HCl washing, (c,c′) HCl-washed aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (d,d′) Na2CO3-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C, (e,e′) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (f,f′) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 90 °C and (g,g′) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C. The inset is the image of the contact angle.
Coatings 12 01717 g002
Coatings 12 01717 g003 550
Figure 3. EDX mapping images of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3-etching.
Figure 3. EDX mapping images of the stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3-etching.
Coatings 12 01717 g003
Coatings 12 01717 g004 550
Figure 4. XPS spectra of (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching and (c) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH-etching at 90 °C.
Figure 4. XPS spectra of (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching and (c) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH-etching at 90 °C.
Coatings 12 01717 g004
Coatings 12 01717 g005 550
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching and (c) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching and (c) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C.
Coatings 12 01717 g005
Coatings 12 01717 g006 550
Figure 6. Digital images of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching, (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test, (c) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C and (d) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test. SEM images of (e) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test, (f) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test. The inset is the image of the contact angle.
Figure 6. Digital images of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching, (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test, (c) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C and (d) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test. SEM images of (e) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test, (f) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test. The inset is the image of the contact angle.
Coatings 12 01717 g006
Coatings 12 01717 g007 550
Figure 7. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
Figure 7. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
Coatings 12 01717 g007
Coatings 12 01717 g008 550
Figure 8. EIS spectra and electrical equivalent circuit of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
Figure 8. EIS spectra and electrical equivalent circuit of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
Coatings 12 01717 g008
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of the purchased 2024 aluminum alloy sheet.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the purchased 2024 aluminum alloy sheet.
ElementsCuSiFeMnMgCrZnTiAl
wt%4.800.090.270.641.610.010.130.0392.42
Table
Table 2. Static water contact angles for (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C after HCl washing, (c) HCl-washed aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (d) Na2CO3-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C, (e) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (f) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 90 °C, (g) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C, (h) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (i) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
Table 2. Static water contact angles for (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C after HCl washing, (c) HCl-washed aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (d) Na2CO3-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C, (e) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (f) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 90 °C, (g) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C, (h) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (i) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
Samples(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)
SWCA *(°)60.521.8108.7108.1161.758.9164.7144.6133.9
* SWCA means static water contact angle.
Table
Table 3. Chemical compositions of (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C after HCl washing, (c) HCl-washed aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (d) Na2CO3-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C, (e) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (f) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 90 °C and (g) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C.
Table 3. Chemical compositions of (a) untreated aluminum alloy, (b) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C after HCl washing, (c) HCl-washed aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (d) Na2CO3-etched aluminum alloy at 25 °C, (e) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after Na2CO3 etching, (f) NaOH-etched aluminum alloy at 90 °C and (g) stearic-acid-treated aluminum alloy after NaOH etching at 90 °C.
SamplesCu wt%Mn wt%Mg wt%Fe wt%Si wt%O wt%C wt%Al wt%
(a)4.630.821.190.460.461.47-90.98
(b)35.973.8211.550.681.9337.30-8.76
(c)5.740.321.640.010.343.01-88.95
(d)8.290.461.550.790.085.11-83.72
(e)4.870.301.230.060.422.3921.3669.36
(f)31.335.1511.350.770.4435.56-15.42
(g)27.312.879.060.804.4135.848.2211.48
Table
Table 4. Corrosion current density (icorr), polarization resistance (Rp) and corrosion potential (Ecorr) of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
Table 4. Corrosion current density (icorr), polarization resistance (Rp) and corrosion potential (Ecorr) of (a) stearic-acid-treated sample after Na2CO3 etching after abrasion test and (b) stearic-acid-treated sample after NaOH etching at 90 °C after abrasion test.
SampleEcorr (mV vs. Ag/AgCl/sat. KCl)icorr (μA cm−2)Rp (kΩ cm2)
(a)3820.15268.7
(b)4900.6835.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shan, L.-M.; Liu, G.-B.; Tang, H.; Li, Z.-H.; Wu, J.-Y. A Novel Simple Fabrication Method for Mechanically Robust Superhydrophobic 2024 Aluminum Alloy Surfaces. Coatings 2022, 12, 1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111717

AMA Style

Shan L-M, Liu G-B, Tang H, Li Z-H, Wu J-Y. A Novel Simple Fabrication Method for Mechanically Robust Superhydrophobic 2024 Aluminum Alloy Surfaces. Coatings. 2022; 12(11):1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111717

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shan, Li-Mei, Guo-Biao Liu, Hua Tang, Zhi-Hong Li, and Ju-Ying Wu. 2022. "A Novel Simple Fabrication Method for Mechanically Robust Superhydrophobic 2024 Aluminum Alloy Surfaces" Coatings 12, no. 11: 1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111717

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop