Next Article in Journal
Electrophoretic Deposition and Characterization of Chitosan/Eudragit E 100 Coatings on Titanium Substrate
Previous Article in Journal
Cattaneo-Christov Heat Flux Model for Second Grade Nanofluid Flow with Hall Effect through Entropy Generation over Stretchable Rotating Disk
Open AccessArticle

Research on Mechanical Properties of 210Cr12 Shaft Surface Processed with Rolling

1
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
2
Shandong Aluminum Industry Co. Ltd., Zibo 255000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2020, 10(7), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10070611
Received: 15 April 2020 / Revised: 24 June 2020 / Accepted: 24 June 2020 / Published: 28 June 2020
The rolling process is one of the most effective ways for strengthening a part’s surface. As the press force exerted on specimen in rolling process, material in the surface layer will deform plastically if the press force is sufficient. That might result in grain refinement, dislocation configuration change, or phase change in specimen surface layer material. Consequently, the surface material mechanical properties can be changed. The effects of rolling parameters on surface residual stress, micro-hardness, and surface roughness for a 210Cr12 shaft have been investigated. After the rolling process, the surface residual stress of the specimen changes from tensile stress to compressive stress, and a stable residual compressive stress layer is formed. The maximum absolute value of compressive stress can be up to 216MPa. With the increase of the value of contact stress exerted on shaft surface and the number of rolling cycles, the absolute value of residual compressive stress increases firstly and then becomes stable. With the increase of depth from shaft surface to interior, the absolute value of residual compressive stress increases initially, then decreases and disappears finally. The maximum absolute value of residual compressive stress exists at the position beneath specimen surface about 0.025mm. The depth of residual stress layer is about 0.2 mm. Research results indicate that shaft surface microhardness can be improved within small range, surface roughness can be reduced up to 67%. View Full-Text
Keywords: rolling; residual stress; surface roughness; surface microhardness rolling; residual stress; surface roughness; surface microhardness
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, Y.; Chen, H.; Qi, K.; Guo, P. Research on Mechanical Properties of 210Cr12 Shaft Surface Processed with Rolling. Coatings 2020, 10, 611.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop