Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Human Milk Oligosaccharides on Antibiotic-Induced Microbial Dysbiosis and Gut Inflammation in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Virological and Pharmaceutical Properties of Clinically Relevant Phages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distribution of Fimbrial Genes and Their Association with Virulence and Levofloxacin Resistance/Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii Multidrug Resistance in University Hospital Environment

by
Francesco Foglia
1,2,
Annalisa Ambrosino
1,
Shahab Bashir
1,
Emiliana Finamore
2,
Carla Zannella
1,
Giovanna Donnarumma
1,2,
Anna De Filippis
1 and
Massimiliano Galdiero
1,2,*
1
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “L.Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
2
Complex Operative Unit of Virology and Microbiology, University Hospital of Campania “L.Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(5), 490; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050490 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 March 2025 / Revised: 7 May 2025 / Accepted: 8 May 2025 / Published: 10 May 2025

Abstract

:
Background: Acinetobacter baumannii is a significant pathogen and a major contributor to healthcare-associated infections, particularly in intensive care units. Its high potential for developing multiple drug resistance (MDR) makes it a challenging pathogen to manage. This study investigates the prevalence and resistance patterns of MDR A. baumannii isolates over a six-year period at a university hospital in Southern Italy. Objective: The aims of this study are to evaluate recent trends in the prevalence of MDR A. baumannii, analyze resistance patterns, and assess the impact of the antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship program implemented in 2018. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” from 2018 to 2023. A total of 191 A. baumannii isolates from blood, urine, and wound samples were analyzed. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed following EUCAST guidelines. The prevalence of MDR strains was assessed across three periods: pre-pandemic (2018–2019), during the pandemic (2020–2021), and post-pandemic (2022–2023) Results: Among the 191 isolates, 89.5% were classified as MDR. The highest number of isolates occurred in 2020, with blood cultures and urine samples increasing by 40.9% and 62.5%, respectively, while wound isolates decreased by 34.2%. The implementation of antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship programs correlated with a reduction in carbapenem resistance in 2020 and 2022. However, resistance to meropenem and colistin persisted. A 60.4% decline in total isolation from 2020 to 2023 suggests effective infection control measures. Conclusions: MDR A. baumannii remains a significant threat to healthcare. Although there have been slight reductions in resistance following antimicrobial stewardship interventions, persistent resistance to last-line antibiotics underscores the urgent need for alternative treatments, enhanced surveillance, and stricter infection control strategies.

1. Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii is recognized as a challenging pathogen due to its high ability to infect hospitalized patients and its resistance to conventional antimicrobial treatments. This bacterium is often found in intensive care units (ICUs). It causes difficult-to-treat infections such as wound infections, bloodstream infections, and severe ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), particularly affecting immunocompromised individuals [1]. A. baumannii is classified as a high-alert human pathogen and ranks at the top of the critical priority list for developing new antibiotics. It is categorized as an ESKAPEE pathogen, alongside Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., and Escherichia coli [2,3]. Research shows that the death rate for ICU patients infected with A. baumannii ranges from 45% to 60%, and this rate can exceed 80% when these microorganisms show extensive drug resistance. The existing treatment options for addressing infections from multiple drug-resistant A. baumannii strains are insufficient. Public health faces a serious threat due to the rapid spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii. This situation has worsened in recent years, with a continuous rise in MDR, extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pandrug-resistant (PDR) hospital isolates of A. baumannii [4,5]. Some strains have even developed resistance to colistin, which is often used as a last-resort treatment [6].
The accurate identification of individual Acinetobacter species is crucial due to significant differences in antibiotic susceptibility and their clinical importance [7]. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is the tool most used in diagnostic laboratories. It allows for the rapid and reliable identification of microorganisms. Its effectiveness relies on comparing protein spectra from clinical isolates with those stored in continuously updated commercial databases [8,9].
Notably, within the Acinetobacter genus, A. baumannii is recognized as the primary pathogen responsible for hospital-acquired infections worldwide.
Previously, A. baumannii was considered a minor pathogen. Still, it has proven to be an effective pathogen, causing opportunistic infections and possibly leading patients towards sepsis and multiple organ failure [10]. A. baumannii has recently emerged as a clinically significant pathogen responsible for ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-related infections, showing antibiotic resistance [11,12]. Furthermore, it is linked to various outbreaks of nosocomial infections, community-acquired infections, and infections related to war and natural disasters [2,11]. However, in intensive care units (ICUs), severe infections caused by this microorganism are the most prevalent. This has made A. baumannii a significant bacterial threat to human health and led to its classification as a critically important pathogen by the WHO [13]. Its ability to rapidly develop effective multidrug resistance (MDR) mechanisms and produce biofilms further worsen this threat [12,14]. This study aimed to accurately determine the prevalence rate of infections and antibiotic resistance level in A. baumanii clinical isolates in University Hospital of Campania. Bacterial strains were analyzed at the Complex Operative Unit of Virology and Microbiology over six years. The identified period was divided into three phases: pre-pandemic [2018–2019], during the pandemic [2020–2021], and post-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [2022–2023].

2. Results

Throughout the monitoring period of 6 years, 10,742 blood cultures were performed, along with 10,503 urine tests, and 4693 samples that included pus, drainage, and swabs were collected. The count of A. baumannii was 82 [0.8%] in samples from the bloodstream, 30 [0.3%] in urine samples, and 79 [1,7%] in pus, drainage, and wound swabs for a total of 191 different strains isolated in 6 years. Considering a microorganism demonstrating resistance to three or more distinct classes of antibiotics as multidrug-resistant, we identified 171 [89.5%] MDR strains among a total of 191 isolated strains.

2.1. Characteristics of Acinetobacter Clinical Isolates

A. baumannii strains were isolated from 191 patients, 67% of them belonging to male patients, indicating a statistically significant male predominance [p < 0.05]. The sex ratio [M/F] was approximately 2.03. The highest number of A. baumannii isolation cases was recorded during the pandemic years [2020–2021], with a noticeable peak in 2020 (Figure 1).
A site sampling analysis of the A. baumannii isolates showed an increase in blood culture samples from 22 to 31 [+40.9%] and urine samples from 8 to 13 [+62.5%] during the pandemic. Conversely, isolates from pus, drainage, and swabs, which are typically familiar sources for A. baumannii, decreased significantly from 35 to 23 [−34.2%] compared to the pre-pandemic period [2018–2019] (Figure 2). This reduction was likely associated with decreased hospital admissions during the lockdown period. In the post-pandemic period [2022–2023], blood cultures and urine samples positive for A. baumannii showed fluctuations but remained lower than those in the 2020 peak, while the presence in pus, drainage, and swabs slightly increased in 2022 before dropping to only four strains in 2023.
The breakdown of isolates across different years demonstrated that the peak isolation occurred in 2020 with 48 strains, which gradually declined to 19 strains in 2023, reflecting a reduction of 60.4%.

2.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Evaluation

In this study, A. baumannii was identified as one of the most prevalent multidrug-resistant microorganisms, showing a multidrug resistance (MDR) rate of 89.5%. After implementing the antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship program in 2018, a slight decrease in carbapenem resistance was noted in 2020 and 2022. However, many isolates in 2023 continued to show resistance to meropenem (Figure 3), indicating a potentially positive impact from ASP. However, the continued presence of carbapenem resistance underscores the ongoing challenge of antimicrobial resistance linked to this pathogen.

3. Discussion

A. baumannii has appeared as a significant nosocomial pathogen, posing a serious concern for the healthcare system due to its ability to develop resistance to multiple drugs [14]. Our study investigates the prevalence and resistance trends in A. baumannii at the University Hospital of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” over the past six years. It underscores the critical need for prompt surveillance programs, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection control measures to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. The peak isolation rates of A. baumannii were seen in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting worldwide trends of secondary bacterial infections in immunocompromised individuals and patients with multiple health conditions. The spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has radically changed disease prevention protocols, including using masks, social distancing, stricter hand hygiene, and dedicated COVID-19 wards. All these preventive measures were highly effective in reducing the transmission of many community-acquired respiratory infection diseases. However, they were insufficient to prevent the dissemination of MDR hospital-acquired infections [15]. Indeed, clinical urgency and the lack of specific therapeutic options led to the widespread and inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as azithromycin, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine [13]. The irrational use of these drugs generated a selective pressure that favored the spread of resistant strains, including A. baumannii [16,17].
In addition, the excessive use of invasive medical devices, particularly in ICUs, such as mechanical ventilators, central venous catheters, and urinary catheters, facilitated nosocomial transmission.
These factors contributed to the peak of MDR A. baumannii occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic, also showing the key role of strict antimicrobial stewardship measures during public health crises.
The prevalence of bloodstream infections and urinary infections caused by A. baumannii was recorded at 40.9% and 62.5%, respectively. Our findings align with those of Rawson TM et al., who noted that hospital-based infections were particularly prevalent during the pandemic due to prolonged hospital stays and increased exposure to multiple medical devices [13]. Another study was conducted at a Saudi hospital facility where the researchers found a considerable increase in A. baumannii infections in ICU patients [14,16]. In contrast to the previously mentioned isolations, wound and pus base isolations showed a decrease of 34.2%. This reduction may be attributed to fewer patients undergoing surgery and treatment for other diseases. The dual impact of the pandemic on nosocomial isolations underscores the need for robust infection control measures [18,19].
Our study found a consistently high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii at 89.5%. This finding highlights the bacteria’s ability to develop multiple-drug resistance [15,20]. These results are in line with previous reports, including a study from Pakistan, which noted increasing trends in A. baumannii prevalence and emphasized the necessity for regular surveillance to address the issue of drug resistance. Compared to 2020, a moderate decline in carbapenem-resistant bacteria was observed in 2022 and 2023, coinciding with the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Indeed, before this, the lack of ASP or diagnostic stewardship (DS) interventions contributed to the high and often inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The ASP and DS interventions adopted in 2018 include early detection supported by routine microbiological reports and the use of MALDI-TOF MS for rapid identification, as well as targeted therapy, promoted through regular audits by our multidisciplinary team, which provides feedback and recommendations on antimicrobial prescriptions. This integrated approach contributed to the observed decline in MDR isolates. Moreover, multiple studies support the idea that such stewardship can reduce the rate of antimicrobial resistance in hospital settings [21,22,23].
Despite radical measures, A. baumannii has shown resistance to the final line of drugs, including carbapenems and colistin. This carbapenem-based resistance is mainly due to the overexpression of the efflux pump [24].
Our study also highlighted that the prevalence of A. baumannii was higher in males than in females, with males representing 67% of the cases. These findings are consistent with another study, which suggests that various factors, such as biological differences, behavioral patterns, and access to healthcare facilities, may explain this discrepancy [1,25].
Colistin was once considered the last line of defense against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria [26,27,28]. However, identifying certain A. baumannii strains resistant to colistin raises significant concerns, as it greatly limits the treatment options available for these MDR strains [29,30]. This resistance may result from lipid A modifications or the loss of lipopolysaccharides. Additionally, other methods of resistance development mentioned by Marino et al. include the upregulation of efflux pumps, enzymatic degradation, and modifications of outer membrane proteins [31].
The data presented in our study highlight the urgent need for alternative combinations of antimicrobial drugs to treat MDR A. baumannii. Options such as cefiderocol and sulbactam have demonstrated susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii [32].
The persistent high prevalence of A. baumannii can be attributed, in part, to its ability to form biofilms [33,34]. This process involves quorum sensing and activates additional resistance mechanisms, such as efflux pumps. These characteristics provide A. baumannii with protection against the host immune system, complicating treatment options. Research suggests that targeted strategies aimed at disrupting biofilms, such as quorum sensing inhibitors, could effectively manage A. baumannii infections [35].
This study has some limitations. First, there is no correlation between microbiological data and the clinical outcomes of the analyzed cases, such as morbidity, mortality, or treatment response. In addition, since this is a single-center study, our findings cannot be directly applied to other hospitals with different patient populations. Moreover, our data referred to the entire hospital, making it impossible to differentiate between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 areas.
One positive outcome of our study was a 60.4% reduction in A. baumannii isolations from 2020 to 2023. This decline indicates that more effective control strategies for antimicrobial infections are being implemented. However, the decrease in resistance does not eliminate concerns within healthcare settings; hyper-resistant strains may still exist that are resistant to nearly all available antibiotics. Therefore, ongoing developments in resistance will continue to present significant challenges for healthcare facilities.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Period and Area

This retrospective study was carried out at the Unit Operative Complex of Virology and Microbiology of the University Hospital “L. Vanvitelli”, a hospital based in Naples. The hospital includes various medical departments, such as intensive care units and specialized units for treating infections. During the pandemic, the facility had a total capacity of 477 hospital beds. This study used electronic records from institutional laboratory information systems to collect data on patients admitted between 2018 and 2023 with positive samples for A. baumannii. This research examined demographic and clinical information, such as age, sex, hospital ward, isolated organisms, and corresponding antibiotic susceptibility profiles. Specimens were obtained from various sources, including blood cultures, pus, exudates, wound swabs, and urine. These sites were selected based on clinical relevance and the isolation frequency observed in our hospital setting. These sources are commonly associated with nosocomial infections in critically ill patients, especially those admitted to the ICU. Other sample types were excluded due to their low prevalence. For each patient, multiple samples that tested positive for A. baumannii within 96 h were consolidated into a single positive result.

4.2. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

In 2018, the University Hospital “L. Vanvitelli” implemented an ASP to reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the incidence of MDR bloodstream infections. This program was based on a prospective audit with feedback, during which a multidisciplinary team, comprising infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, pharmacists, and statisticians, carried out systematic evaluations of antibiotic prescriptions in the ICU three times a week and provided targeted recommendations on therapy choices. In parallel, a diagnostic stewardship program was supported by microbiologists, who routinely delivered local resistance reports to assist clinicians in evidence-based prescribing. This integrated, non-restrictive approach helped reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the incidence of MDR bloodstream infections.

4.3. Identification and Sampling

The specimens were handled and cultured following global standards. Samples were prepared for culture using traditional, accepted techniques; cultures that tested positive underwent further scrutiny, and the species were identified using MALDI-TOF BioTyper 4.1 software [Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany]. This was performed after isolating a single colony on MacConkey agar and incubating it overnight at 37 °C. The Phoenix Automated Microbiology System [Becton Dickinson and Company (BD), Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA] was used to conduct antimicrobial susceptibility testing [AST] integrated using the traditional Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method, and the antimicrobial susceptibility of all the isolates was then evaluated following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) antibiotic guidelines.
The Sensititre™ AST system [Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusets, USA] was used to determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations [MICs] for ceftazidime–avibactam, ceftolozane–tazobactam, colistin, and piperacillintazobactam. Additional tests were conducted for organisms resistant to multiple drugs, including the NG-Test CARBA 5 [NG Biotech, Guipry, France] and Xpert CARBA-R [Cepheid], specifically for organisms producing carbapenemase.
The interpretations of antimicrobial susceptibility testing [AST] and Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations [MICs] were conducted in compliance with the guidelines set by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [EUCAST] [36].

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were examined using IBM SPSS 22.0 for IOS [IBM SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA]. Categorical variables were displayed as counts and proportions. The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact probability method was used to compare qualitative data. A p-value < 0.05 signified a statistically significant difference.

5. Conclusions

Our findings emphasize the dynamic nature of A. baumannii infections, which are influenced by external factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic and internal interventions like antimicrobial stewardship programs. The consistently high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, the emergence of colistin resistance, and the persistence of biofilms highlight the urgent need for new treatment strategies. Future research should focus on alternative antimicrobials, combination therapies, and the potential development of vaccines for A. baumannii.
A comprehensive approach is necessary to combat MDR A. baumannii, integrating ongoing surveillance, innovative antimicrobial solutions, and stringent infection control measures. Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship and investing in novel therapeutic strategies are critical in addressing the growing threat posed by this pathogen.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics14050490/s1, Figure S1: Differences in percentage of MDR A. baumannii; Table S1: Trends in the percentage of A. baumannii resistance to various antimicrobials from 2018 to 2023, a period that began with the introduction of antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship in our hospital; Table S2: Trends in the percentage of MDR A. baumannii from 2018 to 2023.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G. and F.F.; methodology, A.A., C.Z., F.F. and E.F.; software, A.A. and S.B.; validation, M.G. and A.D.F.; resources, M.G.; data curation, A.D.F., C.Z. and F.F.; writing—original draft preparation, F.F., C.Z. and A.D.F.; writing—review and editing, A.D.F. and C.Z.; visualization, E.F. and G.D.; supervision, M.G. and A.D.F.; project administration, M.G.; funding acquisition, M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Severe Infections and Sepsis clinical identification of clinical and diagnostic Markers, immunological monitoring and “Target and tailored” therapies for adults, children and patients admitted to intensive care units “/SIS-NET/ID S4-01.P0001” CUP I83C22001810007—Finanziato dall’Unione Europea—NextGenerationEU (id ateneo codsog_001108)—del Bando a Cascata COC-1-2023-ISS-01—Missione 4 “Istruzione e ricerca”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as it did not involve direct patient participation, and all data were anonymized prior to analysis.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived for our study as it solely utilized laboratory management data and clinical information extracted from de-identified databases.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Complex Operative Unit of Virology and Microbiology staff members of the University Hospital of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Italy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
A. baumanniiAcinetobacter baumannii
AFMsAdvanced Functional Materials
AFLPAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism
AMPAntimicrobial Peptide
ASTAntimicrobial susceptibility testing
BCNPsBacterial Cellulose Nanoparticles
CFUColony-Forming Unit
CRABCarbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
DLSDynamic Light Scattering
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
EUCASTEuropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
ESKAPEEnterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.
HS MediumHestrin–Schramm Medium
ICUIntensive care unit
LBLuria–Bertani
MALDI-TOFMatrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight
MDRMultidrug resistant
MICMinimum Inhibitory Concentration
MLSTMultilocus Sequence Typing
NPsNanoparticles
PDRPandrug resistant
PFGEPulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
QCMQuartz Crystal Microbalance
RAPDRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA
RNARibonucleic Acid
rep-PCRRepetitive Extragenic Palindromic Sequence-Based Polymerase Chain Reaction
SPSSStatistical Package for the Social Sciences
TEMTransmission Electron Microscopy
VABPVentilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
XDRExtensively drug resistant

References

  1. Kyriakidis, I.; Vasileiou, E.; Pana, Z.D.; Tragiannidis, A. Acinetobacter baumannii Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms. Pathogens 2021, 10, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gedefie, A.; Demsis, W.; Ashagrie, M.; Kassa, Y.; Tesfaye, M.; Tilahun, M.; Bisetegn, H.; Sahle, Z. Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm Formation and Its Role in Disease Pathogenesis: A Review. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 3711–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mulani, M.S.; Kamble, E.E.; Kumkar, S.N.; Tawre, M.S.; Pardesi, K.R. Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ozma, M.A.; Abbasi, A.; Asgharzadeh, M.; Pagliano, P.; Guarino, A.; Köse, Ş.; Samadi Kafil, H. Antibiotic Therapy for Pan-Drug-Resistant Infections. Infez. Med. 2022, 30, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaur, J.N.; Singh, N.; Smith, N.M.; Klem, J.F.; Cha, R.; Lang, Y.; Chen, L.; Kreiswirth, B.; Holden, P.N.; Bulitta, J.B.; et al. Next Generation Antibiotic Combinations to Combat Pan-Drug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khalil, M.A.F.; Ahmed, F.A.; Elkhateeb, A.F.; Mahmoud, E.E.; Ahmed, M.I.; Ahmed, R.I.; Hosni, A.; Alghamdi, S.; Kabrah, A.; Dablool, A.S.; et al. Virulence Characteristics of Biofilm-Forming Acinetobacter baumannii in Clinical Isolates Using a Galleria Mellonella Model. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bergogne-Bérézin, E.; Towner, K.J. Acinetobacter spp. as Nosocomial Pathogens: Microbiological, Clinical, and Epidemiological Features. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 9, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.-F.; Hou, X.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.-W.; Zhou, M.-L.; Huang, J.-J.; Zhang, J.-J.; Xu, Y.-C.; Hsueh, P.-R. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Analysis for the Identification of Pathogenic Microorganisms: A Review. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Calderaro, A.; Chezzi, C. MALDI-TOF MS: A Reliable Tool in the Real Life of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montefour, K.; Frieden, J.; Hurst, S.; Helmich, C.; Headley, D.; Martin, M.; Boyle, D.A. Acinetobacter baumannii: An Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen in Critical Care. Crit. Care Nurse 2008, 28, 15–25, quiz 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ayoub Moubareck, C.; Hammoudi Halat, D. Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii: A Review of Microbiological, Virulence, and Resistance Traits in a Threatening Nosocomial Pathogen. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thacharodi, A.; Vithlani, A.; Hassan, S.; Alqahtani, A.; Pugazhendhi, A. Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Raises Global Alarm for New Antibiotic Regimens. iScience 2024, 27, 111367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Langford, B.J.; So, M.; Raybardhan, S.; Leung, V.; Soucy, J.-P.R.; Westwood, D.; Daneman, N.; MacFadden, D.R. Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19: Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Murray, J.F.; Finegold, S.M.; Froman, S.; Will, D.W. The Changing Spectrum of Nocardiosis. A Review and Presentation of Nine Cases. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1961, 83, 315–330. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, H.; Wu, K.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, L.; Lai, Z.; Lin, S. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Nosocomial Infections: A Retrospective Analysis in a Tertiary Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1132323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Petazzoni, G.; Bellinzona, G.; Merla, C.; Corbella, M.; Monzillo, V.; Samuelsen, Ø.; Corander, J.; Sassera, D.; Gaiarsa, S.; Cambieri, P. The COVID-19 Pandemic Sparked Off a Large-Scale Outbreak of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from the Endemic Strains at an Italian Hospital. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e04505-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Knight, G.M.; Glover, R.E.; McQuaid, C.F.; Olaru, I.D.; Gallandat, K.; Leclerc, Q.J.; Fuller, N.M.; Willcocks, S.J.; Hasan, R.; van Kleef, E.; et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and COVID-19: Intersections and Implications. eLife 2021, 10, e64139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rawson, T.M.; Moore, L.S.P.; Zhu, N.; Ranganathan, N.; Skolimowska, K.; Gilchrist, M.; Satta, G.; Cooke, G.; Holmes, A. Bacterial and Fungal Coinfection in Individuals with Coronavirus: A Rapid Review to Support COVID-19 Antimicrobial Prescribing. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2459–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Aldali, J.A. Acinetobacter baumannii: A Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen, Has Emerged in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med. J. 2023, 44, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Peng, H.; Hong, Y.; Huang, L.; Huang, J.; Yan, X.; Wu, S.; Bai, Z. Changes in Prevalence of Nosocomial Infection Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic from a Tertiary Hospital in China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Assimakopoulos, S.F.; Karamouzos, V.; Lefkaditi, A.; Sklavou, C.; Kolonitsiou, F.; Christofidou, M.; Fligou, F.; Gogos, C.; Marangos, M. Triple Combination Therapy with High-Dose Ampicillin/Sulbactam, High-Dose Tigecycline and Colistin in the Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Caused by Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A Case Series Study. Infez. Med. 2019, 27, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  22. Karanika, S.; Paudel, S.; Grigoras, C.; Kalbasi, A.; Mylonakis, E. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Economic Outcomes from the Implementation of Hospital-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 4840–4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chatzopoulou, M.; Reynolds, L. Role of Antimicrobial Restrictions in Bacterial Resistance Control: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 104, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cavallo, I.; Oliva, A.; Pages, R.; Sivori, F.; Truglio, M.; Fabrizio, G.; Pasqua, M.; Pimpinelli, F.; Di Domenico, E.G. Acinetobacter baumannii in the Critically Ill: Complex Infections Get Complicated. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1196774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wushouer, H.; Li, W.; Yu, J.; Hu, L.; Guan, X.; Liu, X.; Wu, A.; Yang, X.; Wang, M.; Xu, Y.; et al. Integrated Assessment of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Prevalent Hospitals in China: A Multidisciplinary Surveillance Network-Based Survey. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2025, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Carroll, L.M.; Gaballa, A.; Guldimann, C.; Sullivan, G.; Henderson, L.O.; Wiedmann, M. Identification of Novel Mobilized Colistin Resistance Gene Mcr-9 in a Multidrug-Resistant, Colistin-Susceptible Salmonella Enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolate. mBio 2019, 10, e00853-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brennan-Krohn, T.; Pironti, A.; Kirby, J.E. Synergistic Activity of Colistin-Containing Combinations against Colistin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00873-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. El-Sayed Ahmed, M.A.E.-G.; Zhong, L.-L.; Shen, C.; Yang, Y.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.-B. Colistin and Its Role in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: An Extended Review (2000–2019). Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 868–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alharbi, O.; Al-Said, H.M.; Ashgar, S.S.; Jalal, N.A.; Faidah, H.; Momenah, A.M.; Johargy, A.K.; Bantun, F.; Qashqari, F.S.; Faidah, O.H.; et al. Prevalence and Antibiogram Pattern of Acinetobacter baumannii from 2013 to 2023 in a Tertiary Care Hospital in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peleg, A.Y.; Seifert, H.; Paterson, D.L. Acinetobacter baumannii: Emergence of a Successful Pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 21, 538–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Poirel, L.; Jayol, A.; Nordmann, P. Polymyxins: Antibacterial Activity, Susceptibility Testing, and Resistance Mechanisms Encoded by Plasmids or Chromosomes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 557–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lim, L.M.; Ly, N.; Anderson, D.; Yang, J.C.; Macander, L.; Jarkowski, A.; Forrest, A.; Bulitta, J.B.; Tsuji, B.T. Resurgence of Colistin: A Review of Resistance, Toxicity, Pharmacodynamics, and Dosing. Pharmacotherapy 2010, 30, 1279–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, Y.; Kumar, S.; Zhang, L. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance and Developments in Therapeutic Strategies to Combat Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection. Infect. Drug Resist. 2024, 17, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Iovleva, A.; Fowler, V.G.; Doi, Y. Treatment Approaches for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections. Drugs 2025, 85, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rajapaksha, D.C.; Edirisinghe, S.L.; Nikapitiya, C.; Whang, I.; De Zoysa, M. The Antimicrobial Peptide Octopromycin Suppresses Biofilm Formation and Quorum Sensing in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Eucast: Clinical Breakpoints and Dosing of Antibiotics. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints (accessed on 24 April 2024).
Figure 1. Isolation patterns of A. baumannii from various samples, including urine, blood, pus, drainages, and swabs.
Figure 1. Isolation patterns of A. baumannii from various samples, including urine, blood, pus, drainages, and swabs.
Antibiotics 14 00490 g001
Figure 2. Distribution and multidrug resistance of A. baumannii strains across clinical specimens over 6 years.
Figure 2. Distribution and multidrug resistance of A. baumannii strains across clinical specimens over 6 years.
Antibiotics 14 00490 g002
Figure 3. Percentage of bacterial resistance from 2018 to 2023 to following antibiotics: MER, meropenem; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; LVX, Levofloxacin; AMK, Amikacin; GEN, Gentamicin; TOB, Tobramycin; COL, colistin; TMP-SMX, Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole; FDC, cefiderocol.
Figure 3. Percentage of bacterial resistance from 2018 to 2023 to following antibiotics: MER, meropenem; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; LVX, Levofloxacin; AMK, Amikacin; GEN, Gentamicin; TOB, Tobramycin; COL, colistin; TMP-SMX, Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole; FDC, cefiderocol.
Antibiotics 14 00490 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Foglia, F.; Ambrosino, A.; Bashir, S.; Finamore, E.; Zannella, C.; Donnarumma, G.; De Filippis, A.; Galdiero, M. Prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii Multidrug Resistance in University Hospital Environment. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050490

AMA Style

Foglia F, Ambrosino A, Bashir S, Finamore E, Zannella C, Donnarumma G, De Filippis A, Galdiero M. Prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii Multidrug Resistance in University Hospital Environment. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(5):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Foglia, Francesco, Annalisa Ambrosino, Shahab Bashir, Emiliana Finamore, Carla Zannella, Giovanna Donnarumma, Anna De Filippis, and Massimiliano Galdiero. 2025. "Prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii Multidrug Resistance in University Hospital Environment" Antibiotics 14, no. 5: 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050490

APA Style

Foglia, F., Ambrosino, A., Bashir, S., Finamore, E., Zannella, C., Donnarumma, G., De Filippis, A., & Galdiero, M. (2025). Prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii Multidrug Resistance in University Hospital Environment. Antibiotics, 14(5), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop