Next Article in Journal
Silicon versus Superbug: Assessing Machine Learning’s Role in the Fight against Antimicrobial Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence and Transmission of Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin (ESC) Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Poultry Production Systems and Slaughterhouses in Denmark
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Natural Compounds with Antifungal Properties against Candida albicans and Identification of Hinokitiol as a Promising Antifungal Drug

1
CNRS, UMR 8576-UGSF-Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, INSERM U1285, F-59000 Lille, France
2
Medicine Faculty, University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
3
CHU Lille, Service de Parasitologie Mycologie, Pôle de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, F-59000 Lille, France
4
INSERM, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur Lille, U1167-RID-AGE-Facteurs de Risque et Déterminants Moléculaires des Maladies Liées au Vieillissement, University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
5
JUNIA, Health and Environment, Laboratory of Sustainable Chemistry and Health, F-59000 Lille, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(11), 1603; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111603
Submission received: 28 September 2023 / Revised: 30 October 2023 / Accepted: 6 November 2023 / Published: 8 November 2023

Abstract

:
Candida albicans is an opportunistic yeast that causes most fungal infections. C. albicans has become increasingly resistant to antifungal drugs over the past decade. Our study focused on the identification of pure natural compounds for the development of antifungal medicines. A total of 15 natural compounds from different chemical families (cinnamic derivatives, aromatic phenols, mono- and sesquiterpenols, and unclassified compounds) were screened in this study. Among these groups, hinokitiol (Hi), a natural monoterpenoid extracted from the wood of the cypress family, showed excellent anti-C. albicans activity, with a MIC value of 8.21 µg/mL. Hi was selected from this panel for further investigation to assess its antifungal and anti-inflammatory properties. Hi exhibited significant antifungal activity against clinically isolated fluconazole- or caspofungin-resistant C. albicans strains. It also reduced biofilm formation and hyphal growth. Treatment with Hi protected Caenorhabditis elegans against infection with C. albicans and enhanced the expression of antimicrobial genes in worms infected with C. albicans. Aside from its antifungal activities against C. albicans, Hi challenge attenuated the LPS-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, and CCL-2) in macrophages. Overall, Hi is a natural compound with antifungal and anti-inflammatory properties, making Hi a promising platform with which to fight against fungal infections.

1. Introduction

The development of invasive fungal infections is a significant health problem in immunocompromised or hospitalized patients [1]. These fungal infections are associated with a high mortality and morbidity rate [2]. The most commonly identified Candida species in hospitals is Candida albicans. The rise in antifungal resistance around the world is one of the greatest emerging health problems, making it difficult to select effective antifungal treatments [3,4]. It has been established that the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is one of the most successful in vivo approaches used to gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis of Candida infections and the innate immune response of the host [5,6]. Additionally, this nematode model is used to investigate the impact of antifungal compounds against Candida infection progression [6]. After the ingestion of yeast forms of C. albicans by the nematode, the yeast cells switch to a hyphal form in the liquid medium, resulting in tissue damage, serious infection, and even the death of the nematode [7].
Many strains of C. albicans are resistant to current antifungal drugs, including azoles and echinocandins [8]. A significant factor in the development of C. albicans resistance is extended exposure to antifungal drugs, particularly the excessive use of azoles and echinocandins as prophylaxis, or the empiric treatment of patients at risk of developing invasive candidiasis. C. albicans virulence is characterized by its ability to form biofilms, which are densely packed communities of cells that adhere to surfaces. In addition, the biofilms formed by C. albicans are highly resistant to a wide range of antifungal agents [6,8].
Nature, and particularly the plant kingdom, represent a great source of active ingredients. Essential oils are obtained from raw plant materials via physico-chemical processes such as dry distillation, or mechanical workout avoiding heating. The development of drugs from essential oils presents several challenges. Essential oils and natural extracts have traditionally been a rich source of therapeutic agents. However, researchers still have to overcome several hurdles, such as their complex chemical composition, limited availability, chemical stability, bioavailability, toxicity, or side effects. Natural extracts generally present complex chemical compositions, which depend on extraction methods (temperature, time, and solvent) and the plant itself (genus, species and part used).
It is therefore difficult to identify and characterize the active ingredients in such a mixture. In addition, natural compounds are often difficult to obtain in sufficient quantities for research and clinical trials due to their limited availability, owing to their low abundance in plants. The bioavailability, toxicity, as well as any potential side effects should also be thoroughly investigated. Additionally, from an ethical or environmental point of view, it should be validated that the natural compounds are not sourced from endangered or protected species. Therefore, we focused on identifying pure natural compounds as platform molecules for the development of next-generation antifungal drugs. Our selection process has already addressed these key points through the selection of compounds that are available in moderate to bulk quantities and are pure in form (purity greater than 95%), at a price which we have deemed reasonable for medicinal development (no more than EUR 1 per gram). This is why our work focused on the identification of pure natural compounds as platform molecules for the further development of next-generation antifungal drugs. It is noteworthy that each selected platform molecule contains a reactive group that is either a hydroxyl, carboxylic acid or a ketone group.
Numerous bioresources and biological activities of essential oils have been reported, particularly regarding their antifungal activity [9]. The antimicrobial effects of thyme essential oil (Thymus vulgaris), containing thymol, have been reported [10,11,12]. The same statement applies to Oregano essential oil (Origanum vulgare), which contains active phenols and sesquiternes [13,14,15]. Peppermint essential oil (Mentha piperita), containing menthol and eucalyptol, is well known for its antifungal applications [16,17]. Lavender oil (Lavandula angustifolia), rich in linalool, geraniol, and eucalyptol, is also frequently used for its medicinal properties [18,19,20]. Other bioresources, such as clove, rosemary, tee-tree, eucalyptus, pine, cinnamon, and cumin, have also been studied. Among the various extracts derived from cypress wood, hinokitiol (β-thujaplicin), a natural extract from the Japan cypress, is a monoterpene compound. Hinokitiol has been shown to exert a wide range of biological and pharmacological effects, including antimicrobial and ant-inflammatory properties [21,22,23], neuroprotective activities [24], and anticancer effects [25].
In the present study, the compound with the best MIC from the first screening of 15 selected compounds was assessed for its antifungal activity against Candida viability, Candida biofilms, and antifungal-resistant clinical Candida isolates, as well as in a model of C. elegans infection. In addition to its antifungal activity against C. albicans, the anti-inflammatory property of this compound was also assessed in macrophages.

2. Results

In the present study, 15 pure natural compounds derived from essential oils were selected and evaluated for their potential antifungal effects against C. albicans. A variety of criteria were used to select these molecules, including their physicochemical properties, their ability to serve as platform molecules for chemical modifications, e.g., the presence of hydroxyl, carboxylic acid or ketone groups, their availability in fair to bulk quantities, their price, and their ADMETs (adsorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity). Table 1 provides a summary of the chemical structures and physicochemical descriptors for each compound. SwissADME software was used for the prediction of the physicochemical descriptors (ADME properties are described in detail in Section 4).
Thus, based on literature reports and in silico calculations, 15 compounds belonging to four classes of molecules were selected, and their potential for inhibiting C. albicans growth was evaluated through a series of tests. The MIC values of each compound are shown in Table 1.
The first sub-class is composed of derivatives of cinnamic acid, which occur naturally in plants. In the selection process, ferulic, caffeic, and syringic acids, bearing an aromatic ring as well as an acrylic acid, were chosen. The MIC values for these three molecules were around 1000 µg/mL, which means that they displayed a low inhibitory capacity. However, from a chemical point of view, there was an increase in the biological activity of compounds with hydroxy groups attached to the aromatic moiety. There is no doubt that caffeine (2 OH) is a more effective antioxidant than ferulic acid (1 OH + 1 OCH3), which in turn is more effective than sinapic acid (1 OH and 2 OCH3). The activity of the compounds decreased as their lipophilicity increased. It was evident that when sinapic acid was compared to syringic acids, there was a decrease in activity as a result of the double bond (acrylate). Altogether, the derivatives of cinnamic acid did not seem to be interesting candidates for use as antifungal agents against C. albicans.
The second family is composed of aromatic phenols, such as eugenol, thymol, and sesamol. Overall, the MICs for aromatic phenols were better than those for cinnamic acid derivatives, ranging from 660 to 820 µg/mL. Eugenol and ferulic acid are both composed of the same 3-methoxy, 4-hydroxyphenyle aromatic moiety. In view of this similarity, it can be concluded that the carboxylic acid in ferulic acid has a deleterious effect on its biological activity. In this family, sesamol had the highest hydrophilicity and solubility, as well as the best MIC value of 660 µg/mL. There was a significant correlation between the lowest log P and the most active molecule in both series.
The third family contains four mono- and one sesquiterpenols (e.g., L-menthol, citronellol, geraniol, linalool, and cedrol, respectively). These are hydroxylated linear or cyclic alkyles. The monoterpenols exhibited the same low MIC value of 780 µg/mL, which proves that the position of the alcohol moiety and the stereochemistry are not of crucial significance to the activity of the monoterpenol. Cedrol, which is a hindered cyclic alkyl alcohol, exhibited a moderate MIC of 111 µg/mL, which is better than the MICs of all monoterpenols that were tested. Altogether, members of this third family are of moderate interest as antifungal agents, but cedrol could potentially be considered as a platform molecule for further development or optimization.
The fourth family of compounds consists of three chemical compounds, namely kojic acid, which is a hydroxy-pyrone molecule, hinokitiol (Hi), a tropolone derivative, and eucalyptol, also known as 1,8-cineole, which is a bicyclic ether that belongs to the monoterpenoids. Although kojic acid possessed excellent hydrophilicity and solubility, it did not appear to have any antifungal activity against C. albicans. There was no evidence that eucalyptol exhibited any potent antifungal activity. However, Hi, a moderately lipophilic aromatic seven-membered tropolone isolated from the Cupressaceae family, displayed excellent anti-Candida activity when tested, with a MIC of 8.21 µg/mL in our screening. In this regard, Hi was selected from this panel to conduct further studies.

2.1. Analysis of the Antifungal Properties of Hi against Clinical Strains of C. albicans

The effectiveness of Hi against fluconazole- and caspofungin-resistant C. albicans strains isolated from patients was assessed in order to determine whether Hi can eradicate these drug-resistant clinical isolates (Table 2). Fluconazole- and caspofungin-resistant C. albicans strains displayed a significant reduction in viability with Hi challenge (Figure 1). Thus, according to these data, it appears that Hi can inhibit drug-resistant C. albicans strains, which is one of the major concerns when treating patients with invasive Candida infection.

2.2. Effect of Hi on C. albicans Biofilm and Hyphal Formation

To determine whether Hi has the potential to affect C. albicans biofilm formation, which is implicated in various antifungal resistance mechanisms, including resistance to azoles and echinocandins, C. albicans biofilms were challenged with Hi at 1× MIC (Figure 2). Hi inhibited the formation of C. albicans biofilms by 90%. Microscopic examination revealed that the biofilm matrix of C. albicans was dense and highly compacted when it was challenged with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a control (CTL). In contrast, when the C. albicans cells were incubated with Hi, the biofilm seemed to dissolve, and the C. albicans cells appeared to separate from the biofilm matrix.
The transition from yeast to hyphae is one of the virulence factors associated with the pathogenicity of C. albicans (Figure 2). It was therefore assessed whether Hi has an impact on the hyphal formation of C. albicans. Hyphal formation was induced in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and C. albicans cells were monitored at 0, 2, and 3 h. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C, vigorous hyphal formation was observed in the untreated cells. In contrast, Hi challenge reduced hyphal formation at 2 h. Its effect was still clearly effective at preventing hyphal formation even after 3 h of exposure (Figure 2).

2.3. Effect of Hi Treatment on the Survival of C. elegans Infected with C. albicans

Using a model of C. elegans infected with C. albicans, we were able to determine whether Hi was effective in vivo against C. albicans (Figure 3). Adult nematodes infected with C. albicans were treated with Hi at a concentration of 1× MIC. The survival rate of C. elegans was monitored daily via microscopic observation. During the experiment, nematodes that were infected with C. albicans without treatment were used as a CTL group. An 85% nematode mortality rate within 4 days of fungal infection was recorded. When the worms were treated with Hi, there was a significant increase in the survival rate of C. elegans compared to the untreated CTL group of worms. A 95% survival rate was observed for nematodes treated with Hi. To investigate the effect of Hi on the immune response of C. elegans, the expression of Lys-1 and Lys-7, as well as Fipr-22/23, which are involved in the antimicrobial response, was examined. The Hi treatment of C. elegans infected with C. albicans was shown to enhance the expression of the antimicrobial genes Lys-1, Lys-7, and Fipr-22/23 when compared to untreated nematodes (CTL). This indicates that Hi treatment improved the expression of antimicrobial genes promoting the elimination of C. albicans (Figure 3).

2.4. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Hi

An excessive pro-inflammatory response can lead to chronic inflammation and disrupt the pathways responsible for maintaining biological homeostasis, resulting in a variety of detrimental health problems. We assessed whether Hi modulated LPS-induced proinflammatory responses in macrophages (Figure 4). A significant reduction in the expression of cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and chemokine CCL-2 was found after the challenge of macrophages with Hi.

3. Discussion

A panel of natural molecules derived from essential oils was selected based on their physicochemical properties and each individual compound was tested for its potential antifungal activity against C. albicans. Through a series of analyses, 15 compounds from four classes (cinnamic derivatives, aromatic phenols, mono- and sesqui-terpenols, and other unclassified molecules) were evaluated. Considering the MIC values of cinnamic acid derivatives, it does not appear that these compounds are of particular interest as antifungal candidates against C. albicans. While the MIC values for aromatic phenol derivatives and mono and sesquiterpenoids were better than those obtained for the cinnamic acid derivatives, these two families of compounds are only of moderate interest as antifungal agents against C. albicans. Among the fourth group of unclassified compounds, Hi showed excellent anti-Candida activity, with a MIC value of 8.21 µg/mL. In light of these data, Hi was selected from this panel for further investigation to assess its antifungal properties against C. albicans. Hi is a natural monoterpenoid derived from wood of the cypress family [54]. A tropolone core containing an isopropyl group forms the backbone of its chemical skeleton. Hi is found abundantly in Thujopsis dolabrata, which is a dense and evergreen conifer native to the Central Japan region. It is known to have biological activity, including antitumor properties [55,56,57]. Several studies have shown that Hi reduces tumor growth by activating apoptosis and autophagy [25,56,58]. Hi has been shown to possess significant antibacterial activity against a range of pathogenic bacteria [23,59]. In addition to its antibacterial activities, Hi has also been assessed against a variety of fungal species, including Aspergillus and Candida species [60,61].
In the present study, a significant reduction in C. albicans viability was observed after the Hi challenge of fluconazole and caspofungin-resistant strains, indicating that this compound has potential as a natural antifungal agent in the case of antifungal drug resistance. These data are in accordance with a previous study, which showed that Hi had antifungal activity against fluconazole-resistant Candida strains [61]. Throughout this study, Hi demonstrated significant anti-Candida activity against all fluconazole-resistant strains that were tested [61]. In terms of biofilm formation, Hi was shown to significantly inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation by 90%. Furthermore, it was found that C. albicans cells were dispersed from the biofilm matrix after being challenged with Hi, indicating that the biofilm was dissolving and the C. albicans cells were being separated from the matrix. In line with this study, Kim et al. showed that Hi efficiently prevented biofilm formation in both fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-resistant Candida strains [61]. In addition to biofilm formation, one of the virulence factors of C. albicans is the formation of hyphae. Hi challenge was found to reduce hyphal formation in C. albicans. It has been shown that Hi decreases the expression levels of UME6 and HGC1 in C. albicans, which are responsible for long-term hyphal growth [61]. Furthermore, Hi has been shown to suppress the expression of the gene CYR1, which encodes the component of the signaling pathway that controls hyphal formation, cAMP-PKA, as well as the expression level of CYR1 [61]. A model of C. elegans infected with C. albicans showed that worms treated with Hi had a higher survival rate when compared to a CTL group of untreated worms. C. elegans survival is consistent with the observations regarding hyphal growth, which showed that Hi challenge inhibited C. albicans filamentation, which in turn prevented fungal infection. The treatment of C. elegans with Hi after C. albicans infection significantly enhanced the expression of the antimicrobial genes Lys-1, Lys-7, and Fipr-22/23 when compared to untreated nematodes. This indicates that Hi treatment increases the expression of antimicrobial genes, thereby facilitating the elimination of the parasite.
In addition to its antifungal properties against C. albicans, we also determined whether Hi could modulate the LPS-induced expression of proinflammatory genes in macrophages. The expression of cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and chemokine CCL-2 was significantly reduced after the challenge of macrophages with Hi. Different studies corroborate our findings that Hi challenge suppresses the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages [21,62].
In conclusion, Hi showed excellent antifungal activity against C. albicans, including clinical isolates of C. albicans that were resistant to the most common antifungal agents. Furthermore, Hi also reduced biofilm formation and hyphal growth. Treatment with Hi protected C. elegans against infection with C. albicans and enhanced the expression of antimicrobial genes. In addition to its antifungal properties against C. albicans, Hi challenge attenuated the LPS-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages, indicating its anti-inflammatory properties. Overall, Hi is a natural compound that has antifungal and anti-inflammatory properties, making it a promising candidate for the development of new drugs able to treat fungal infections and to prevent the spread of antifungal resistance to synthetic compounds.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Fungal and Human Cell Line Culture

The strain used for this study was C. albicans SC5314 (Table 1) [52]. C. albicans yeast cells were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) at 37 °C for 24 h [63]. A suspension of C. albicans was prepared by culturing the yeast cells in Sabouraud dextrose broth (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) at 37 °C for 24 h in a rotating shaker. A series of washes with PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) were performed on the yeast cells before being centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min and resuspended in PBS. Regarding the clinical strains of C. albicans, six strains isolated from patients with a history of fluconazole or caspofungin resistance were cultured on SDA for 24–48 h. The MIC values were evaluated based on the laboratory standard culture microdilution method developed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI), as described previously by Pfaller et al. (Table 2) [64]. In terms of identifying the clinical isolates, a volume of 1.5 µL of matrix solution (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) with 50% acetonitrile, 47.5% water, and 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid was added to each colony of C. albicans clinical isolate. Each strain of C. albicans was identified using MALDI-TOF MS (Microflex-Bruker Daltonics). For the culture of macrophages, the differentiation of THP-1 cells (human leukemia monocytic cell line) into macrophages was achieved using phorbol-12-myristate13-acetate (PMA: Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 200 ng/mL for 72 h [65,66]. Macrophages at a concentration of 106 cells/well were then incubated for 24 h in RPMI medium. Afterwards, macrophages were exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at a concentration of 250 ng/mL (LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4; Sigma-Aldrich) for 6 h [67]. In addition, Hi at a concentration of 1× MIC (8.21 µg/mL) was added to macrophages exposed to LPS. Next, macrophages were harvested and resuspended in RA1 buffer for mRNA extraction, followed by RT-PCR and q-PCR [63,68]. SYBR green real-time PCR master mix reagent was used to amplify cDNAs for quantitative PCR. A one-step software program was used to determine the SYBR green dye intensity.

4.2. Fungal Viability Assays

JUNIA supplied all natural compounds from (TCI, Paris, France) and (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). For the selection of the compounds, SwissADME software was used for the prediction of the physicochemical descriptors [14]. These descriptors are meaningful criteria used to select candidates to be evaluated further. Log P describes how the molecules split themselves between a water/oil biphasic medium. Therefore, log P helps to predict how the drug candidates will behave in the body. The degree of lipophilicity of a compound is a very significant determinant of its absorption, distribution in the body, penetration through membranes, metabolism, and elimination (ADME properties) [15,16]. LogKp represents the skin permeation factor. This is of great interest to develop compounds that could be used as topical formulations as it gives an indication of the absorption rate. When logKp is low, diffusion through the skin is slow. Citronellol was the compound exhibiting the fastest rate of permeation, with a Kp of 3.3 × 10−5 cm s−1; this is compared to kojic acid, which displayed a Kp of 3.4 × 10−8 cm s−1, indicating that kojic acid diffuses 1380 times slower than citronellol among our panel of selected compounds.
The topological polar surface area (TPSA) can be used in drug development to estimate the effectiveness of a drug in terms of its ability to penetrate cells. A TPSA > 140 angstroms squared (Å2) is generally considered to be a poor permeation barrier for molecules. Our panel of compounds followed this metric. Furthermore, molecules with a low TPSA can permeate the blood–brain barrier (BBB).
It is of critical importance for ADME properties to have a high level of solubility in water. Among our panel of selected compounds, it is noteworthy that some of them were highly soluble (e.g., kojic acid and sesamol), while many of them have limited solubility, thus limiting their effectiveness (e.g., cedrol, geraniol, and citronellol).
Gastrointestinal absorption (GIA) refers to the absorption of compounds through the gut, whereas BBBP refers to their permeation through the blood–brain barrier. These data will help us to understand the possible distribution of molecules in the body. In addition, it is noteworthy that all compounds have a high gastrointestinal absorption rate but a variable BBBP level.
Each compound was divided into multiple small batches and stored at −20 °C. A fresh aliquot for each experiment was diluted in PBS and adjusted to the appropriate concentration. MIC assays for these natural compounds were carried out using Alamar Blue reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [69]. The MICs of caspofungin and fluconazole were also used as positive controls for these experiments. Since Alamar Blue is metabolized by the yeast, it can be used to determine both the MIC value and the activity of the fungal cells. Alamar Blue (10 µL) was placed in each well containing 5 × 103 yeasts in 90 µL of RPMI medium. As for the antifungals, different concentrations of natural compounds were used (between 5 × 10−3 M and 5 × 10−6 M in the well). The MIC was determined for each natural compound as the concentration that inhibited yeast growth by 99%. A Fluostar OMEGA spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance of each sample at 600 nm at both T0 and T24. Additionally, a volume of 100 µL of each dilution was grown on SDA and incubated for 48 h to assess the fungal viability.

4.3. C. albicans Biofilm Formation

In this stage, 5 × 103 C. albicans yeast cells were suspended in 200 µL of RPMI medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). This suspension was then placed in each well of a polystyrene plate (Greiner Bio-One). Following the incubation of the plates for 48 h at 37 °C, the plates were washed several times with PBS to eliminate yeast cells that were not adherent to the plates [70]. Hi was then added to the plates at a concentration of 1× MIC (8.21 µg/mL) for the next 24 h. After 24 h of incubation, the wells were washed with PBS and air dried at 37 °C. The biofilms were stained with 0.4% crystal violet solution (Fluka) for 20 min. The wells were then washed multiple times with PBS, and a volume of 200 µL of ethanol was added to each well. The absorbance of the destaining solution, which represents the number of viable C. albicans cells, was determined at 550 nm using a spectrophotometer (FLUOstar; BMG Labtech). The average of six replicates of two independent experiments represents the C. albicans biofilm data. For the induction of hyphal growth, a suspension of 5 × 103 C. albicans yeast cells was challenged with Hi at a concentration of 1× MIC (8.21 µg/mL) in 200 µL of RPMI medium with 10% FBS and incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. C. albicans cells were monitored at 0, 2, and 3 h. Germ tube or hyphal formation was assessed microscopically using a Zeiss AxioImager microscope [53].

4.4. C. elegans Survival Assay

The culture of C. albicans SC5314 in Sabouraud dextrose broth was maintained for 24 h. A lawn of C. albicans was cultured by spreading a volume of 10 µL of C. albicans yeast cell suspension on brain heart infusion plates containing amikacin (45 µg/mL). The plates were then placed at 37 °C for 24 h. A wild-type strain C. elegans N2 was cultured in nematode growth medium seeded with E. coli strain OP50 at 20 °C. The populations of C. elegans were synchronized and kept at 20 °C for incubation [71]. For each experiment, 100 nematodes were selected. To eliminate E. coli from the worms, the nematodes were washed with M9 buffer containing amikacin at a concentration of 90 µg/mL before being transferred to C. albicans lawns. After the incubation of plates at room temperature for 6 h, multiple washes with M9 buffer were then performed on the worms to ensure that all C. albicans yeast cells were removed from their cuticles. A total of 70–80 worms infected with C. albicans were then placed in wells in a 6-well microtiter dish containing 20% brain heart infusion, 2 mL of 80% liquid M9 buffer, 90 µg/mL of amikacin, and 10 µg/mL of cholesterol in ethanol. Hi at 1× the MIC value (8.21 µg/mL) was then added to each well. The incubation of the plates was carried out at room temperature for 12 h. During the course of the experiment, the worms were examined daily for survival for a period of 4 days, and if no nematodes responded to mechanical stimulation with a pick, they were considered dead. In terms of the RT-PCR assay, the total RNA was extracted from nematodes after 12 h of Hi challenge using a NucleoSpin RNA® kit (Macherey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France). RNA from worms was measured via spectrophotometry (Nanodrop; Nyxor Biotech, Paris, France). To synthesize the cDNA, a high-capacity DNA reverse transcription (RT) kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was employed, along with the Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The cDNA was amplified using Fast SYBR green (Applied Biosystems) in a one-step method (Applied Biosystems). An analysis of the SYBR green dye intensity was performed using software that was designed for one-step analysis. The results were normalized to the reference gene, act-2.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

To determine the differences between the groups, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. The data were considered statistically significant when the p value was p < 0.05; p < 0.01; and p < 0.001. All statistical analyses were performed using version 10 software of GraphPad Prism (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Author Contributions

L.C., B.U., M.B. (Mathys Buisine), D.L., M.B. (Muriel Billamboz) and S.J. performed the experiments. L.C., B.U., M.B. (Mathys Buisine), D.L., M.B. (Muriel Billamboz), B.S. and S.J. analyzed the data. L.C., D.L., M.B. (Muriel Billamboz), B.S. and S.J. interpreted the results of the experiments. S.J. designed this study and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) in the setting of project “InnateFun”, promotional reference ANR-16-IFEC-0003-05, in the “Infect-ERA” program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Antonino Bongiovanni for his excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Poulain, D.; Sendid, B.; Standaert-Vitse, A.; Fradin, C.; Jouault, T.; Jawhara, S.; Colombel, J.F. Yeasts: Neglected pathogens. Dig. Dis. 2009, 27 (Suppl. 1), 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Turnidge, J.D.; Castanheira, M.; Jones, R.N. Twenty Years of the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program: Results for Candida Species From 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6 (Suppl. 1), S79–S94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jawhara, S. How Gut Bacterial Dysbiosis Can Promote Candida albicans Overgrowth during Colonic Inflammation. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jawhara, S. How Fungal Glycans Modulate Platelet Activation via Toll-Like Receptors Contributing to the Escape of Candida albicans from the Immune Response. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Powell, J.R.; Ausubel, F.M. Models of Caenorhabditis elegans infection by bacterial and fungal pathogens. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008, 415, 403–427. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shu, C.; Sun, L.; Zhang, W. Thymol has antifungal activity against Candida albicans during infection and maintains the innate immune response required for function of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Immunol. Res. 2016, 64, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pukkila-Worley, R.; Peleg, A.Y.; Tampakakis, E.; Mylonakis, E. Candida albicans hyphal formation and virulence assessed using a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. Eukaryot. Cell 2009, 8, 1750–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atriwal, T.; Azeem, K.; Husain, F.M.; Hussain, A.; Khan, M.N.; Alajmi, M.F.; Abid, M. Mechanistic Understanding of Candida albicans Biofilm Formation and Approaches for Its Inhibition. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. D’Agostino, M.; Tesse, N.; Frippiat, J.P.; Machouart, M.; Debourgogne, A. Essential Oils and Their Natural Active Compounds Presenting Antifungal Properties. Molecules 2019, 24, 3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pinto, E.; Pina-Vaz, C.; Salgueiro, L.; Goncalves, M.J.; Costa-de-Oliveira, S.; Cavaleiro, C.; Palmeira, A.; Rodrigues, A.; Martinez-de-Oliveira, J. Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Thymus pulegioides on Candida, Aspergillus and dermatophyte species. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55 Pt 10 Pt 10, 1367–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Daferera, D.J.; Ziogas, B.N.; Polissiou, M.G. The effectiveness of plant essential oils on the growth of Botrytis Cinerea, Fusarium sp. And Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Crop Prot. 2003, 22, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Segvic Klaric, M.; Kosalec, I.; Mastelic, J.; Pieckova, E.; Pepeljnak, S. Antifungal activity of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) essential oil and thymol against moulds from damp dwellings. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Leyva-Lopez, N.; Gutierrez-Grijalva, E.P.; Vazquez-Olivo, G.; Heredia, J.B. Essential Oils of Oregano: Biological Activity beyond Their Antimicrobial Properties. Molecules 2017, 22, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Han, F.; Ma, G.Q.; Yang, M.; Yan, L.; Xiong, W.; Shu, J.C.; Zhao, Z.D.; Xu, H.L. Chemical composition and antioxidant activities of essential oils from different parts of the oregano. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2017, 18, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stringaro, A.; Colone, M.; Angiolella, L. Antioxidant, Antifungal, Antibiofilm, and Cytotoxic Activities of Mentha spp. Essential Oils. Medicines 2018, 5, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tampieri, M.P.; Galuppi, R.; Macchioni, F.; Carelle, M.S.; Falcioni, L.; Cioni, P.L.; Morelli, I. The inhibition of Candida albicans by selected essential oils and their major components. Mycopathologia 2005, 159, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bialon, M.; Krzysko-Lupicka, T.; Nowakowska-Bogdan, E.; Wieczorek, P.P. Chemical Composition of Two Different Lavender Essential Oils and Their Effect on Facial Skin Microbiota. Molecules 2019, 24, 3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Behmanesh, F.; Pasha, H.; Sefidgar, A.A.; Taghizadeh, M.; Moghadamnia, A.A.; Adib Rad, H.; Shirkhani, L. Antifungal Effect of Lavender Essential Oil (Lavandula angustifolia) and Clotrimazole on Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study. Scientifica 2015, 2015, 261397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. D’Auria, F.D.; Tecca, M.; Strippoli, V.; Salvatore, G.; Battinelli, L.; Mazzanti, G. Antifungal activity of Lavandula angustifolia essential oil against Candida albicans yeast and mycelial form. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Srinivasulu, C.; Ramgopal, M.; Ramanjaneyulu, G.; Anuradha, C.M.; Suresh Kumar, C. Syringic acid (SA)—A Review of Its Occurrence, Biosynthesis, Pharmacological and Industrial Importance. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Byeon, S.E.; Lee, Y.G.; Kim, J.C.; Han, J.G.; Lee, H.Y.; Cho, J.Y. Hinokitiol, a natural tropolone derivative, inhibits TNF-alpha production in LPS-activated macrophages via suppression of NF-kappaB. Planta Med. 2008, 74, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saeki, Y.; Ito, Y.; Shibata, M.; Sato, Y.; Okuda, K.; Takazoe, I. Antimicrobial action of natural substances on oral bacteria. Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll. 1989, 30, 129–135. [Google Scholar]
  23. Le, C.Y.; Ye, Y.J.; Xu, J.; Li, L.; Feng, X.Q.; Chen, N.P.; Zhu, B.Q.; Ding, Z.S.; Qian, C.D. Hinokitiol Selectively Enhances the Antibacterial Activity of Tetracyclines against Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0320522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Koufaki, M.; Theodorou, E.; Alexi, X.; Nikoloudaki, F.; Alexis, M.N. Synthesis of tropolone derivatives and evaluation of their in vitro neuroprotective activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, W.K.; Lin, S.T.; Chang, W.W.; Liu, L.W.; Li, T.Y.; Kuo, C.Y.; Hsieh, J.L.; Lee, C.H. Hinokitiol induces autophagy in murine breast and colorectal cancer cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2016, 31, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chaudhary, A.; Jaswal, V.S.; Choudhary, S.; Sharma, A.; Beniwal, V.; Tuli, H.S.; Sharma, S. Ferulic Acid: A Promising Therapeutic Phytochemical and Recent Patents Advances. Recent Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 2019, 13, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, D.; Rui, Y.X.; Guo, S.D.; Luan, F.; Liu, R.; Zeng, N. Ferulic acid: A review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and derivatives. Life Sci. 2021, 284, 119921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khan, F.; Bamunuarachchi, N.I.; Tabassum, N.; Kim, Y.M. Caffeic Acid and Its Derivatives: Antimicrobial Drugs toward Microbial Pathogens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2979–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Merlani, M.; Barbakadze, V.; Amiranashvili, L.; Gogilashvili, L.; Poroikov, V.; Petrou, A.; Geronikaki, A.; Ciric, A.; Glamoclija, J.; Sokovic, M. New Caffeic Acid Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents: Design, Synthesis, Evaluation and Docking. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 292–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pandi, A.; Kalappan, V.M. Pharmacological and therapeutic applications of Sinapic acid-an updated review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 3733–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, C. Sinapic Acid and Its Derivatives as Medicine in Oxidative Stress-Induced Diseases and Aging. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 3571614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ansari, M.A.; Fatima, Z.; Hameed, S. Sesamol: A natural phenolic compound with promising anticandidal potential. J. Pathog. 2014, 2014, 895193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schmidt, E.; Jirovetz, L.; Wlcek, K.; Buchbauer, G.; Gochev, V.; Girova, T.; Stoyanova, A.; Geissler, M. Antifungal Activity of Eugenol and Various Eugenol-Containing Essential Oils against 38 Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2007, 10, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Damiens, A.; Alebrahim, M.T.; Leonard, E.; Fayeulle, A.; Furman, C.; Hilbert, J.L.; Siah, A.; Billamboz, M. Sesamol-based terpenoids as promising bio-sourced crop protection compounds against the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 2403–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. de Castro, R.D.; de Souza, T.M.; Bezerra, L.M.; Ferreira, G.L.; Costa, E.M.; Cavalcanti, A.L. Antifungal activity and mode of action of thymol and its synergism with nystatin against Candida species involved with infections in the oral cavity: An in vitro study. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jafri, H.; Ahmad, I. Thymus vulgaris essential oil and thymol inhibit biofilms and interact synergistically with antifungal drugs against drug resistant strains of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. J. Mycol. Med. 2020, 30, 100911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kamatou, G.P.; Vermaak, I.; Viljoen, A.M.; Lawrence, B.M. Menthol: A simple monoterpene with remarkable biological properties. Phytochemistry 2013, 96, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ben Miri, Y.; Nouasri, A.; Herrera, M.; Djenane, D.; Arino, A. Antifungal Activity of Menthol, Eugenol and Their Combination against Aspergillus ochraceus and Aspergillus niger In Vitro and in Stored Cereals. Foods 2023, 12, 2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Silva, D.; Diniz-Neto, H.; Cordeiro, L.; Silva-Neta, M.; Silva, S.; Andrade-Junior, F.; Leite, M.; Nobrega, J.; Morais, M.; Souza, J.; et al. (R)-(+)-beta-Citronellol and (S)-(−)-beta-Citronellol in Combination with Amphotericin B against Candida Spp. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mukarram, M.; Choudhary, S.; Khan, M.A.; Poltronieri, P.; Khan, M.M.A.; Ali, J.; Kurjak, D.; Shahid, M. Lemongrass Essential Oil Components with Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities. Antioxidants 2021, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pereira Fde, O.; Mendes, J.M.; Lima, I.O.; Mota, K.S.; Oliveira, W.A.; Lima Ede, O. Antifungal activity of geraniol and citronellol, two monoterpenes alcohols, against Trichophyton rubrum involves inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Medeiros, C.I.S.; Sousa, M.N.A.; Filho, G.G.A.; Freitas, F.O.R.; Uchoa, D.P.L.; Nobre, M.S.C.; Bezerra, A.L.D.; Rolim, L.; Morais, A.M.B.; Nogueira, T.; et al. Antifungal activity of linalool against fluconazole-resistant clinical strains of vulvovaginal Candida albicans and its predictive mechanism of action. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2022, 55, e11831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Jiang, Q.; Shi, Q. Revealing the Mechanisms for Linalool Antifungal Activity against Fusarium oxysporum and Its Efficient Control of Fusarium Wilt in Tomato Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jeong, H.U.; Kwon, S.S.; Kong, T.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, H.S. Inhibitory effects of cedrol, beta-cedrene, and thujopsene on cytochrome P450 enzyme activities in human liver microsomes. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2014, 77, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Akhmedov, A.; Gamirov, R.; Panina, Y.; Sokolova, E.; Leonteva, Y.; Tarasova, E.; Potekhina, R.; Fitsev, I.; Shurpik, D.; Stoikov, I. Towards potential antifungal agents: Synthesis, supramolecular self-assembly and in vitro activity of azole mono-, sesqui- and diterpenoids. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023, 21, 4863–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, G.Y.; Shi, X.C.; Wang, S.Y.; Wang, B.; Laborda, P. Antifungal Mechanism and Efficacy of Kojic Acid for the Control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 845698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Brtko, J. Biological functions of kojic acid and its derivatives in medicine, cosmetics, and food industry: Insights into health aspects. Arch. Pharm. 2022, 355, e2200215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Balaz, S.; Uher, M.; Brtko, J.; Veverka, M.; Bransova, J.; Dobias, J.; Podova, M.; Buchvald, J. Relationship between antifungal activity and hydrophobicity of kojic acid derivatives. Folia Microbiol. 1993, 38, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Komaki, N.; Watanabe, T.; Ogasawara, A.; Sato, N.; Mikami, T.; Matsumoto, T. Antifungal mechanism of hinokitiol against Candida albicans. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 735–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ivanov, M.; Kannan, A.; Stojkovic, D.S.; Glamoclija, J.; Calhelha, R.C.; Ferreira, I.; Sanglard, D.; Sokovic, M. Camphor and Eucalyptol-Anticandidal Spectrum, Antivirulence Effect, Efflux Pumps Interference and Cytotoxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mishra, P.; Gupta, P.; Srivastava, A.K.; Poluri, K.M.; Prasad, R. Eucalyptol/ beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complex loaded gellan/PVA nanofibers as antifungal drug delivery system. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 609, 121163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gillum, A.M.; Tsay, E.Y.; Kirsch, D.R. Isolation of the Candida albicans gene for orotidine-5’-phosphate decarboxylase by complementation of S. cerevisiae ura3 and E. coli pyrF mutations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1984, 198, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bortolus, C.; Billamboz, M.; Charlet, R.; Lecointe, K.; Sendid, B.; Ghinet, A.; Jawhara, S. A Small Aromatic Compound Has Antifungal Properties and Potential Anti-Inflammatory Effects against Intestinal Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Isono, T.; Domon, H.; Nagai, K.; Maekawa, T.; Tamura, H.; Hiyoshi, T.; Yanagihara, K.; Kunitomo, E.; Takenaka, S.; Noiri, Y.; et al. Treatment of severe pneumonia by hinokitiol in a murine antimicrobial-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia model. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Domon, H.; Hiyoshi, T.; Maekawa, T.; Yonezawa, D.; Tamura, H.; Kawabata, S.; Yanagihara, K.; Kimura, O.; Kunitomo, E.; Terao, Y. Antibacterial activity of hinokitiol against both antibiotic-resistant and -susceptible pathogenic bacteria that predominate in the oral cavity and upper airways. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 63, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shih, Y.H.; Chang, K.W.; Hsia, S.M.; Yu, C.C.; Fuh, L.J.; Chi, T.Y.; Shieh, T.M. In vitro antimicrobial and anticancer potential of hinokitiol against oral pathogens and oral cancer cell lines. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 168, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hoang, B.X.; Han, B. A possible application of hinokitiol as a natural zinc ionophore and anti-infective agent for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and viral infections. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 145, 110333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, H.Y.; Cheng, W.P.; Chiang, Y.F.; Hong, Y.H.; Ali, M.; Huang, T.C.; Wang, K.L.; Shieh, T.M.; Chang, H.Y.; Hsia, S.M. Hinokitiol Exhibits Antitumor Properties through Induction of ROS-Mediated Apoptosis and p53-Driven Cell-Cycle Arrest in Endometrial Cancer Cell Lines (Ishikawa, HEC-1A, KLE). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Inamori, Y.; Muro, C.; Sajima, E.; Katagiri, M.; Okamoto, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Sakagami, Y.; Tsujibo, H. Biological activity of purpurogallin. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 890–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Meng, F.; Liu, X.; Li, C.; Peng, X.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Q.; Sui, J.; Zhao, G.; Lin, J. Hinokitiol inhibits Aspergillus fumigatus by interfering with the cell membrane and cell wall. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1132042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, D.J.; Lee, M.W.; Choi, J.S.; Lee, S.G.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, S.W. Inhibitory activity of hinokitiol against biofilm formation in fluconazole-resistant Candida species. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hiyoshi, T.; Domon, H.; Maekawa, T.; Yonezawa, D.; Kunitomo, E.; Tabeta, K.; Terao, Y. Protective effect of hinokitiol against periodontal bone loss in ligature-induced experimental periodontitis in mice. Arch. Oral. Biol. 2020, 112, 104679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jawhara, S.; Thuru, X.; Standaert-Vitse, A.; Jouault, T.; Mordon, S.; Sendid, B.; Desreumaux, P.; Poulain, D. Colonization of mice by Candida albicans is promoted by chemically induced colitis and augments inflammatory responses through galectin-3. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 972–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Procop, G.W.; Rinaldi, M.G. Multicenter comparison of the VITEK 2 antifungal susceptibility test with the CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing amphotericin B, flucytosine, and voriconazole against Candida spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3522–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Camaioni, L.; Lambert, D.; Sendid, B.; Billamboz, M.; Jawhara, S. Antifungal Properties of Hydrazine-Based Compounds against Candida albicans. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Charlet, R.; Le Danvic, C.; Sendid, B.; Nagnan-Le Meillour, P.; Jawhara, S. Oleic Acid and Palmitic Acid from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Lactobacillus johnsonii Exhibit Anti-Inflammatory and Antifungal Properties. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dumortier, C.; Charlet, R.; Bettaieb, A.; Jawhara, S. H89 Treatment Reduces Intestinal Inflammation and Candida albicans Overgrowth in Mice. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jawhara, S.; Poulain, D. Saccharomyces boulardii decreases inflammation and intestinal colonization by Candida albicans in a mouse model of chemically-induced colitis. Med. Mycol. 2007, 45, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rampersad, S.N. Multiple applications of Alamar Blue as an indicator of metabolic function and cellular health in cell viability bioassays. Sensors 2012, 12, 12347–12360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mena, L.; Billamboz, M.; Charlet, R.; Despres, B.; Sendid, B.; Ghinet, A.; Jawhara, S. Two New Compounds Containing Pyridinone or Triazine Heterocycles Have Antifungal Properties against Candida albicans. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zwirchmayr, J.; Kirchweger, B.; Lehner, T.; Tahir, A.; Pretsch, D.; Rollinger, J.M. A robust and miniaturized screening platform to study natural products affecting metabolism and survival in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Influence of Hi on the viability of C. albicans isolates resistant to caspofungin and fluconazole. (A,C) Caspofungin-resistant C. albicans strains. (B,D) Fluconazole-resistant C. albicans strains. Clinical isolates of C. albicans were challenged with Hi at 1× MIC (A,B) and 2× MIC (C,D). The viability of C. albicans was evaluated after 24 h using Alamar Blue reagent. CTL: Clinical strain of C. albicans without antifungal treatment; Fluco: C. albicans cells challenged with fluconazole; Caspo: C. albicans cells challenged with caspofungin.
Figure 1. Influence of Hi on the viability of C. albicans isolates resistant to caspofungin and fluconazole. (A,C) Caspofungin-resistant C. albicans strains. (B,D) Fluconazole-resistant C. albicans strains. Clinical isolates of C. albicans were challenged with Hi at 1× MIC (A,B) and 2× MIC (C,D). The viability of C. albicans was evaluated after 24 h using Alamar Blue reagent. CTL: Clinical strain of C. albicans without antifungal treatment; Fluco: C. albicans cells challenged with fluconazole; Caspo: C. albicans cells challenged with caspofungin.
Antibiotics 12 01603 g001
Figure 2. Impact of Hi challenge on C. albicans biofilm formation and hyphal growth. (A) The cells of C. albicans developed into a dense biofilm after 48 h. Hi at 1× MIC was added to the C. albicans biofilms for 24 h. CTL: C. albicans alone without antifungal challenge; (B) biofilms of C. albicans challenged with (a) CTL: C. albicans alone without antifungal treatment, (b) Hi. Scale bars represent 100 µm. (C) Hyphal formation of C. albicans. C. albicans cells were monitored at 0, 2, and 3 h after hyphal formation in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS. (D) Microscopic observation of hyphal formation after 3 h incubation. (a) C. albicans cells without treatment. (b) C. albicans challenged with Hi. * p < 0.05 for control conditions vs. C. albicans challenged with Hi. Scale bars represent 5 µm.
Figure 2. Impact of Hi challenge on C. albicans biofilm formation and hyphal growth. (A) The cells of C. albicans developed into a dense biofilm after 48 h. Hi at 1× MIC was added to the C. albicans biofilms for 24 h. CTL: C. albicans alone without antifungal challenge; (B) biofilms of C. albicans challenged with (a) CTL: C. albicans alone without antifungal treatment, (b) Hi. Scale bars represent 100 µm. (C) Hyphal formation of C. albicans. C. albicans cells were monitored at 0, 2, and 3 h after hyphal formation in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS. (D) Microscopic observation of hyphal formation after 3 h incubation. (a) C. albicans cells without treatment. (b) C. albicans challenged with Hi. * p < 0.05 for control conditions vs. C. albicans challenged with Hi. Scale bars represent 5 µm.
Antibiotics 12 01603 g002
Figure 3. Impact of Hi on C. albicans pathogenesis in a C. elegans infection model. (A) The survival rate of nematodes infected with C. albicans was evaluated every day for four days, and the percentage of worms that survived on day four was determined. Nematodes infected with C. albicans were treated with Hi at 1× MIC (8.21 µg/mL). Nematodes that failed to respond to contact were determined to be dead using a platinum wire pick. CTL: C. albicans-infected nematodes without antifungal treatment; Hi: C. albicans-infected nematodes treated with Hi. (B) Antimicrobial peptide expression in C. elegans infected with C. albicans (Lys-1, Lys-7, and Fipr-22/23). The adult nematodes were infected for 6 h with C. albicans SC5314 lawns and then treated for 12 h with Hi at 1× MIC (8.21 µg/mL). CTL represents C. albicans-infected nematodes without treatment. Hi corresponds to C. albicans-infected nematodes treated with Hi. Values are shown as mean ± SD of four independent experiments.
Figure 3. Impact of Hi on C. albicans pathogenesis in a C. elegans infection model. (A) The survival rate of nematodes infected with C. albicans was evaluated every day for four days, and the percentage of worms that survived on day four was determined. Nematodes infected with C. albicans were treated with Hi at 1× MIC (8.21 µg/mL). Nematodes that failed to respond to contact were determined to be dead using a platinum wire pick. CTL: C. albicans-infected nematodes without antifungal treatment; Hi: C. albicans-infected nematodes treated with Hi. (B) Antimicrobial peptide expression in C. elegans infected with C. albicans (Lys-1, Lys-7, and Fipr-22/23). The adult nematodes were infected for 6 h with C. albicans SC5314 lawns and then treated for 12 h with Hi at 1× MIC (8.21 µg/mL). CTL represents C. albicans-infected nematodes without treatment. Hi corresponds to C. albicans-infected nematodes treated with Hi. Values are shown as mean ± SD of four independent experiments.
Antibiotics 12 01603 g003
Figure 4. Expression of proinflammatory mediators in macrophages challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and treated with Hi. Relative expression levels of IL-6, IL-1β, and CCL-2 mRNA, respectively, in macrophages. CTL−: control group (macrophages alone); CTL+: macrophages exposed to LPS; Hi: macrophages challenged with LPS and treated with Hi.
Figure 4. Expression of proinflammatory mediators in macrophages challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and treated with Hi. Relative expression levels of IL-6, IL-1β, and CCL-2 mRNA, respectively, in macrophages. CTL−: control group (macrophages alone); CTL+: macrophages exposed to LPS; Hi: macrophages challenged with LPS and treated with Hi.
Antibiotics 12 01603 g004
Table 1. Panel of natural compounds, their MICs against C. albicans and physicochemical descriptors.
Table 1. Panel of natural compounds, their MICs against C. albicans and physicochemical descriptors.
CompoundStructureM (g/mol)MIC (µg/mL)logP alogKp
cm/s b
TPSA (Å2) cBBBP dRef e
CINNAMIC DERIVATIVES1Ferulic acidAntibiotics 12 01603 i001194.18970.91.36−6.4166.76Yes[26,27]
2Caffeic acidAntibiotics 12 01603 i002180.16900.80.93−6.5877.76No[28,29]
3Sinapic acidAntibiotics 12 01603 i003224.211121.051.31−6.6375.99No[30,31]
AROMATIC PHENOLS4Syringic acidAntibiotics 12 01603 i004198.17990.850.99−6.7775.99No[20]
5EugenolAntibiotics 12 01603 i005164.208212.25−5.6929.46Yes[32]
6SesamolAntibiotics 12 01603 i006132.11660.551.19−6.2738.69Yes[33,34]
7ThymolAntibiotics 12 01603 i007150.22751.12.80−4.8720.23Yes[35,36]
MONO & SESQUITERPENOLS8L-MentholAntibiotics 12 01603 i008156.27781.352.59−4.8420.23Yes[37,38]
9CitronellolAntibiotics 12 01603 i009156.27781.352.92−4.4820.23Yes[38,39]
10GeraniolAntibiotics 12 01603 i010154.25781.352.74−4.7120.23Yes[40,41]
11LinaloolAntibiotics 12 01603 i011154.25781.352.66−5.1320.23Yes[42,43]
12CedrolAntibiotics 12 01603 i012222.37111.1853.54−4.9020.23Yes[44,45]
OTHERS13Kojic acidAntibiotics 12 01603 i013142.11710.55−0.16−7.6270.67No[46,47,48]
14HinokitiolAntibiotics 12 01603 i014164.208.211.98−5.7937.30Yes[49]
15EucalyptolAntibiotics 12 01603 i015154.25781.352.77−5.139.23Yes[50,51]
a Log P: octanol/water partition coefficient calculated using SwissADME; b LogKp: skin permeation calculated using SwissADME; c TPSA: topology polar surface area calculated using SwissADME; d BBBP: blood–brain barrier permeant; e Ref: references.
Table 2. MIC values of the C. albicans strains used in the study.
Table 2. MIC values of the C. albicans strains used in the study.
StrainDescriptionCaspofungin
MIC (µg/mL)
Fluconazole
MIC (µg/mL)
Ref.
C. albicans SC5314Wild-type0.030.5[52]
C. albicans 15343c3523Blood, caspofungin-resistant20.5[53]
C. albicans 15351c6859Venous catheter, caspofungin-resistant41[53]
C. albicans 92535989Tracheal secretion, fluconazole-resistant0.0664[53]
C. albicans 17287c305Blood, caspofungin-resistant80.5[53]
C. albicans 14316c1746Bronchoalveolar lavage, fluconazole-resistant0.03128[53]
C. albicans 14294c5335Stools, fluconazole-resistant0.065[53]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Camaioni, L.; Ustyanowski, B.; Buisine, M.; Lambert, D.; Sendid, B.; Billamboz, M.; Jawhara, S. Natural Compounds with Antifungal Properties against Candida albicans and Identification of Hinokitiol as a Promising Antifungal Drug. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1603. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111603

AMA Style

Camaioni L, Ustyanowski B, Buisine M, Lambert D, Sendid B, Billamboz M, Jawhara S. Natural Compounds with Antifungal Properties against Candida albicans and Identification of Hinokitiol as a Promising Antifungal Drug. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(11):1603. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111603

Chicago/Turabian Style

Camaioni, Louis, Bastien Ustyanowski, Mathys Buisine, Dylan Lambert, Boualem Sendid, Muriel Billamboz, and Samir Jawhara. 2023. "Natural Compounds with Antifungal Properties against Candida albicans and Identification of Hinokitiol as a Promising Antifungal Drug" Antibiotics 12, no. 11: 1603. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111603

APA Style

Camaioni, L., Ustyanowski, B., Buisine, M., Lambert, D., Sendid, B., Billamboz, M., & Jawhara, S. (2023). Natural Compounds with Antifungal Properties against Candida albicans and Identification of Hinokitiol as a Promising Antifungal Drug. Antibiotics, 12(11), 1603. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111603

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop