Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Mining to Identify Molecular Markers for the Diagnosis of Staphylococcus epidermidis Bloodstream Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Decision-Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/antibiotics11111594
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effectiveness of the Fungal Metabolite 3-O-Methylfunicone towards Canine Coronavirus in a Canine Fibrosarcoma Cell Line (A72)

by
Claudia Cerracchio
1,
Valentina Iovane
2,
Maria Michela Salvatore
3,4,
Maria Grazia Amoroso
5,*,
Hiba Dakroub
2,5,
Marina DellaGreca
3,
Rosario Nicoletti
2,6,
Anna Andolfi
3,7,* and
Filomena Fiorito
1,7,*
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
3
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
4
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, 80055 Portici, Italy
5
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Unit of Virology, Department of Animal Health, 80055 Portici, Italy
6
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 81100 Caserta, Italy
7
BAT Center-Interuniversity Center for Studies on Bioinspired Agro-Environmental Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(11), 1594; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111594
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 6 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 11 November 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Canine coronavirus (CCoV), an alphacoronavirus, may cause self-limiting enteric disease in dogs, especially in puppies. The noteworthy plasticity of coronaviruses (CoVs) occurs through mutation and recombination processes, which sometimes generate new dangerous variants. The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the isolation of a novel canine–feline recombinant alphacoronavirus from humans emphasizes the cross-species transmission ability of CoVs. In this context, exploring antiviral compounds is essential to find new tools for fighting against CoVs infections. Fungi produce secondary metabolites, which are often developed as antibiotics, fungicides, hormones, and plant growth regulators. Previous examinations of benzo-γ-pyrone 3-O-methylfunicone (OMF), obtained from Talaromyces pinophilus, showed that it reduces the infectivity of hepatitis C virus and bovine herpesvirus 1. Based on this evidence, this study evaluated the antiviral ability of OMF against CCoV infection in a canine fibrosarcoma (A72) cell line. During CCoV infection, a non-toxic dose of OMF markedly increased features of cell viability. Moreover, OMF induced a significant reduction in virus yield in the presence of an intense downregulation of the viral nucleocapsid protein (NP). These findings occurred in the presence of a marked reduction in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) expression. Taken together, preliminary findings suggest that OMF inhibiting AhR shows promising activity against CCoV infection.

1. Introduction

Canine coronavirus (CCoV) belongs to the genus of alphacoronaviruses and is the etiological agent of enteric infections in dogs. Genotype II of canine coronavirus (CCoV-II) is characterized by high morbidity and low mortality [1,2,3], but an extremely virulent CCoV-IIa pantropic strain has been detected in Italian outbreaks of fatal disease in puppies, which spreads in extraintestinal tissues causing multi-systemic infections [2,4,5,6,7]. Recent studies also reported CCoV spillover from wild animals into human patients. In fact, a new CCoV has been isolated in Malaysia from a child patient hospitalized for pneumonia between 2017 and 2018, which has been identified via genome sequencing and called CCoV-HuPn-2018 [8]. Moreover, the HuCCoV_Z19Haiti, a novel CCoV, has been isolated from a medical team member presenting fever and malaise after travel to Haiti [9]. These cases are evidence of the direct consequence of the recombination and mutation tendency of coronavirus (CoV) genomes, which allows them to overcome natural barriers that usually prevent cross-species transmission, and to adapt to new species [1,2,10]. In fact, molecular mechanisms influence the adaptation, transmissibility, host/tissue tropism, and pathogenicity of viruses causing the production of novel strains.
The recent pandemic of COVID-19 due to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has turned the spotlight on CoVs that are able to mutate into new and more dangerous strains. Hence, in the current scenario of emerging pathogenic coronaviruses with pandemic potential similar to SARS-CoV2, there is intense investigational activity focused on finding novel antivirals. Natural products offer a rich source of potential materials for the identification and development of novel drugs. In particular, fungal metabolites are regarded for their valued properties, such as structural variability, original mechanism of action, and bioactivities [11,12]. Funicones, as well as related compounds, constitute a homogeneous group of fungal polyketides possessing remarkable biological activities which have promoted their consideration as drug possibilities [13,14]. Among them, 3-O-methylfunicone (OMF) has shown significant antifungal, antiproliferative, and pro-apoptotic activities [15], as well as potential antiviral properties, towards hepatitis C virus (HCV) [16] and bovine herpesvirus type-1 (BoHV-1) [17].
Based on these observations, the potential antiviral effect of OMF against CCoV infection in canine fibrosarcoma cells (A72) was investigated after assessing the non-toxic in vitro dose of this compound.

2. Results

2.1. 3-O-Methylfunicone (OMF)

OMF (Figure 1) was purified from a chloroform extract of a liquid culture of isolate LT6 of Talaromyces pinophilus, using a chromatographic process (see Section 4.1). NMR spectroscopic characteristics were the same as the authentic standard compound [18].

2.2. OMF Increased Cell Viability during CCoV Infection

To examine the effect of OMF in CCoV infection in A72 cells, cell proliferation by 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and cell viability using a TB exclusion test were assessed. First, half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of OMF were identified and dose–response curves were developed after treatment of A72 cells with various concentrations of OMF (Figure 2a). Hence, A72 cells, in monolayer, were infected or not with CCoV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of five, and were exposed or not to OMF at various doses (0.5, 1, 2.5 and 5 μM), yielding the following groups: uninfected or infected cells, and OMF-exposed infected and uninfected cells. Cell growth inhibition was detected in A72 cells with an IC50 of approximately 2.5 μM OMF after 48 h of treatment (Figure 2b). OMF at 1 and 0.5 µM in A72 cells produced no significant differences in cell proliferation, as assessed using an MTT test (p > 0.05) (Figure 2b). Similar results were observed by analyzing cell viability using trypan blue (TB) staining (Figure 2c). Thus, these results demonstrated that OMF at a concentration of 0.5 μM did not significantly alter A72 cell viability or cell proliferation. Interestingly, the cell toxicity at 2.5 μM seemed to be high compared to 5 μM OMF in A72 cells (Figure 2a,b). This result was previously observed in bovine cells (MDBK) treated with OMF [17]. This nonmonotonic dose–response has been observed for a variety of compounds, including micronutrients, endocrine disrupting chemicals, and endogenous hormones, which typically bind nuclear receptors [19].
During CCoV infection in A72 cells in the presence of OMF at 0.5 µM, cell proliferation (p < 0.01) (Figure 3a,b) and cell viability (p < 0.001) (Figure 3c) significantly increased. Hence, the concentration of OMF at 0.5 µM was selected to be utilized throughout the study. Our findings showed that during CCoV infection in A72 cells at the non-toxic dose of 0.5 µM, OMF significantly reduced cell death after 48 h of infection.

2.3. OMF Reduced Signs of Morphological Cell Death during CCoV Infection in A72 Cells

To observe the influence of OMF during CCoV infection, A72 cell morphology was analysed using Giemsa staining and light microscopy at 48 h of infection. As displayed in Figure 4, the comparison between OMF-exposed uninfected cells and the control group showed no changes in morphology. An increase in intercellular spaces due to detachment from the culture plate were observed in unexposed infected cells. These features were accompanied by changes in morphology suggesting signs of apoptotic cell death, such as cellular shrinkage, pyknosis, and chromatin condensation (Figure 4, arrow). All cell death features were markedly diminished in CCoV-infected cells exposed to OMF (Figure 4, arrow). Overall, our findings demonstrated that OMF remarkably protected A72 cells during CCoV infection.

2.4. OMF Reduced Virus Yield during CCoV Infection in A72 Cells

To study the influence of OMF during CCoV infection in A72 cells, virus titer and viral cytopathic effects (CPE) were analysed for 72 h after infection.
Remarkably, statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05) declines in virus titer were detected via quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) after 48 h and 72 h of infection, respectively, in cells exposed to OMF in CCoV infection (Figure 5). In addition, at 48 h after infection, CPE, identified by detachment from culture plates, was extensive in infected cells, whereas it noticeably lessened in OMF-exposed infected groups (Figure 4). Therefore, our findings revealed that OMF noticeably decreased virus yield and CPE during CCoV infection.

2.5. OMF Downregulated the Expression of AhR and NP during CCoV Infection

To investigate the influence of OMF on AhR protein expression during CCoV infection in A72 cells, immunofluorescence (IF) staining was carried out. In the control group, represented by uninfected cells, we found that AhR was expressed [20], whereas in OMF-exposed cells, a downregulation of AhR protein expression was detected (Figure 6a). This result was proven using integrated density fluorescence measurement (Figure 6b).
Moreover, during CCoV infection exposed or not to OMF, the expression of AhR and NP was analysed using IF staining. After 24 h of infection, a noticeable reduction in both AhR and NP was detected in the presence of OMF (Figure 7a,b).
Taken together, these findings indicated that both NP and AhR expression were decreased by OMF.

3. Discussion

The need to find new antiviral products dramatically increased after the impact of COVID-19. So far, fungi have been particularly considered as a valuable source of antibiotic, antitumor, and immunomodulatory products [21,22]; however, recent investigations have shown that many fungal compounds possess remarkable antiviral properties [11,12], which deserve further assessment in view of integration with current drugs available to treat CoVs [23].
The search for potential chemotherapeutics is supported by insights regarding the structural aspects of virus proteins [24]. Indeed, computational approaches have confirmed that many fungal products could be effectively employed in therapy against SARS-CoV-2 by acting as protein inhibitors [25]. Pyranonigrin A, produced by Penicillium thymicola, was identified as a possible inhibitor of the main protease (Mpro) of the virus using docking and molecular dynamics simulation [26]. Moreover, fonsecin, a naphthopyrone produced by Aspergillus fonsecaeus, displayed a high binding affinity for the papaine-like protease of SARS-CoV-2 through interaction with the Tyr268 amino acid residue of the enzyme cavity [27]. Pyrrocidine A, a polyketide-amino acid-derivative from the endophytic fungus Acremonium zeae, and 18-methoxy-cytochalasin J were characterized as potent inhibitors of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase [28]. Finally, cyclosporine A, a renowned immunosuppressant also proposed for the treatment of hepatitis C [29] and MERS-CoV [30], was shown to be able to suppress replication of CoVs [31,32].
As a typical class of fungal secondary metabolites displaying a wide range of bioactive properties [14], the funicones have been recently characterized as having interesting antiviral properties. In this respect, deoxyfunicone was reported to be effective as an HIV-1-integrase inhibitor [33,34], and OMF was found to be able to reduce the infectivity of the hepatitis C virus [16]. Concerning the latter compound, in our previous studies, OMF induced a significant reduction in virus yield, and deeply inhibited bICP0 expression, the main regulatory protein in the lytic cycle of BoHV-1 [17].
In this study, OMF, at the non-toxic concentration of 0.5 μM, did not significantly increase cell death during CCoV infection, and weakened morphological cell death marks, which typically developed during CCoV infection in A72 cells [35,36]. Indeed, following in vitro infection, it has been shown that virus-induced apoptosis occurs in the presence of modulation in the levels of the sirtuin and FOXO family, which are proteins involved in cell damage due to apoptosis or oxidative stress [37].
As previously detected in BoHV-1 infection [17], herein, during CCoV infection, OMF induced a significant decrease in virus yield, which occurred in the presence of a downregulation of AhR, indicating AhR’s involvement in OMF’s antiviral action. These findings are in agreement with recent evidence showing the involvement of AhR in both human and animal coronaviruses infections [38,39,40,41]. Indeed, AhR inhibition induces a decrease in the expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptors, accompanied by an inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human cells [20,40,41]. In addition, AhR stimulates the enzyme indolamine 2,3 dioxygenase, which is involved in the production of kynurenine starting from tryptophan. These regulatory actions act cell growth by inducing apoptosis [41]. Herein, following in vitro CCoV infection, an antiviral activity, accompanied by a reduction in morphological apoptotic features, was likely due to OMF, as its aromatic nature probably inhibits AhR.
Conversely, during BoHV-1 infection, OMF provokes an increase in the expression of AhR [17]. This conflicting phenomenon emphasizes the timing of AhR induction for regulating the balance between immunopathology and antiviral defensive immunity [42]. Indeed, it has been described that AhR activation promotes the replication of herpesviruses, including cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex I (HSV-1), HSV-II, and BoHV-1 [43,44]. In particular, several mice died due to herpes encephalitis following HSV-1 infection when AhR was up-regulated before infection, whereas, when stimulation of AhR occurred subsequent to HSV-1 infection, herpetic pathology was reduced.
In conclusion, in the current scenario of emerging pathogenic CoVs such as SARS-CoV2, our findings highlight the ability of OMF to reduce CCoV infection. Moreover, we also show the convenience of exploring the potential anti-viral properties of natural molecules, such as OMF, using an in vitro system; this represents an effective approach for studying CoVs without the manipulation of hazardous viruses.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Production and Isolation of OMF

Mycelial plugs from actively growing cultures of T. pinophilus LT6 were inoculated in 1 L-Erlenmayer flasks containing 500 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB, Himedia, West Chester, PA, USA). The cultures were kept in a stationary phase in darkness at 25 °C. After 21 days, the liquid phase (3 L) was separated via filtration at 0.45 µm, and the culture filtrate was concentrated via lyophilization until it was reduced to 1/10 of the starting volume. The latter was extracted three times with the same volume of chloroform, as previously reported [18]. The crude extract (43.4 mg) was submitted to fractionation via column chromatography (1.0 × 30 cm i.d.) on silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 0.063–0.200 mm, Merk, Darmstadt, Germany), and eluted with CHCl3/iso-PrOH (95:5, v/v). Six homogeneous fraction groups were collected (A, 2.1 mg; B, 9.2 mg; C, 4.1 mg; D, 2.3 mg; E, 4.1 mg; and F, 8.2 mg). The residue of the second fraction was purified using thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel (Kieselgel 60, F254, 0.25 mm, Merk) eluted with CHCl3/iso-PrOH (95:5, v/v), yielding OMF (4.1 mg). It was identified by comparing NMR data with previously reported data [18].

4.2. Cell Cultures and Virus Infection

A72 cells (canine fibrosarcoma cell line) were cultivated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 [36,37]. The strain S/378 of CCoV type II was utilized throughout the study. For virus stocks growth and virus titration, A72 cells were utilized [36].
OMF was first dissolved in DMSO, and then added to the medium at final doses of 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM.
A72 cells, in monolayers, were infected or not with CCoV, at a MOI of five, and exposed or not to OMF (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM), to obtain four groups: CCoV uninfected or infected cells, and OMF-exposed infected and uninfected groups. Cells were incubated 1 h after adsorption at 37 °C, and treated at 0, 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after infection. The virus was in culture medium for the duration of the experiment.

4.3. Cell Proliferation

Cell proliferation evaluation was assayed via MTT assay [17,45,46,47]. In brief, A72 cells cultured in 96-well plates were infected or not with CCoV at a MOI of five, and exposed or not to OMF (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM) to obtain four groups: uninfected or infected cells, and OMF-exposed infected and uninfected cells, and then incubated. After 48 h of infection, MTT assays were performed. Results were the mean ± S.D. of three separate experiments conducted in duplicate.

4.4. Cell Viability

Cell viability was evaluated using a TB (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) exclusion test [17]. A72 cells, in monolayer, were infected or not with CCoV at a MOI of five, exposed or not to OMF at 0.5 μM, incubated for 48 h, and processed as previously reported [17]. Cell viability was then evaluated as a percentage of living cells over the total cell number. Results were reported as the mean ± S.D. of three separate experiments conducted in duplicate.

4.5. Examination of Cell Morphology

To study the morphology of A72 cells, Giemsa staining followed by light microscopy examination was utilised [17,48]. A72 cells were infected or not with CCoV at a MOI of five, exposed or not to OMF (5 µM), and incubated at 37 °C. At 48 h p.i., Giemsa staining was carried out, and light microscopy analysis was performed using a ZOE Cell Imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Segrate, Milan, Italy). To identify cellular death characteristics, criteria previously reported were used [49,50,51].

4.6. IF Staining

A72 cells were infected or not with CCoV at a MOI of five, and exposed or or not to OMF (0.5 µM). At 24 h p.i., IF staining was assessed [17,52] using antibodies dissolved in 5% bovine serum albumin-TBST: anti-AhR (Sigma-Aldrich) (1:250); anti-NP monoclonal mouse, MAB 938 (The Native Antigen Company, Kidlington, UK); Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (1:1000); and Texas Red goat anti-rabbit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (1:100). Microscopic study and photography were undertaken using a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Fluorescence signals of images from microscopy were quantified using ImageJ software (version 1.53a, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.7. Virus Production

A72 cells were infected or not with CCoV at a MOI of five, exposed or not to OMF, incubated at 37 °C, and processed after 0, 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h p.i. using quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) for CCoV quantification. In addition, CPE was examined. Therefore, at indicated times p.i., cells were analysed using a light microscope, as previously reported [17,36].

4.8. Viral Nucleic Acids Extraction Procedures

Nucleic acids were isolated from the samples (200 µL cell supernatant) using an automatic extraction system (King Fisher Flex) employing the MagMax Viral Pathogen kit (all Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DMEM was utilized as a negative process control and elution was carried out in 60 µL.

4.9. Real-Time RT-PCR for CCoV Quantification

RT-qPCR was carried out to evaluate the titer of CCoV II during infection in A72 cells with or without OMF. Detection was carried out at various times post infection (1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h) using a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For each sample, the reaction (25 µL) contained: 5 µL of nucleic acids, 1× AGPATH reaction mix, 1× reverse transcriptase-PCR enzyme mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 µL (10 µM) of each primer (CCoV-For 5’-TTGATCGTTTTTATAACGGTTC-TACAA-3’, CCoV-Rev 5’-AATGGGCCATAATAGCCACATAAT-3’) and 1 µL (6 µM) of probe CCoV-P (FAM-5’-ACCTCAATTTAGCTGGTTCGTGTATGGCATT-3’-TAMRA) [53]. The thermal profile was reverse transcription for 30 min at 42 °C, followed by 15 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, and 60 s at 60 °C. A standard curve was used to quantify CCoV in the samples; it was built by analysing serial dilutions of the extracted virus (from 3.5 × 109 to 3.5 × 104 TCID50/mL) and plotting the Log TCID50/mL versus the Ct number. The presence of PCR inhibitors was evaluated for each sample as previously described elsewhere [54], by adding murine norovirus as an external process control (EPC) [55].

4.10. Statistical Analysis

Data are shown as mean ± S.D. GraphPad InStat Version 3.00 for Windows 95 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.N., A.A., and F.F.; formal analysis, C.C., V.I., M.M.S., and H.D.; data curation, C.C., M.G.A., and F.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C., M.M.S., and R.N.; writing—review and editing, M.G.A., A.A., and F.F.; supervision, M.G.A., M.D., A.A., and F.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, Grant number IZS ME 05/21RC.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank C. Buonavoglia (University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy) for CCoV type II (strain S/378).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kenney, S.P.; Wang, Q.; Vlasova, A.; Jung, K.; Saif, L. Naturally occurring animal coronaviruses as models for studying highly pathogenic human coronaviral disease. Vet. Pathol. 2021, 58, 438–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Timurkan, M.O.; Aydin, H.; Dincer, E.; Coskun, N. Molecular characterization of canine coronaviruses: An enteric and pantropic approach. Arch. Virol. 2021, 166, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pratelli, A.; Tempesta, M.; Elia, G.; Martella, V.; Decaro, N.; Buonavoglia, C. The knotty biology of canine coronavirus: A worrying model of coronaviruses’ danger. Res. Vet. Sci. 2022, 144, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Torun, S.; Yilmaz, Z.; Pratelli, A. A serological evidence of minute virus of canines (MVC; canine parvovirus type-1) in dogs in Turkey. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2005, 29, 923–925. [Google Scholar]
  5. Buonavoglia, C.; Decaro, N.; Martella, V.; Elia, G.; Campolo, M.; Desario, C.; Castagnaro, M.; Tempesta, M. Canine coronavirus highly pathogenic for dogs. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 492–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Decaro, N.; Mari, V.; von Reitzenstein, M.; Lucente, M.S.; Cirone, F.; Elia, G.; Martella, V.; King, V.L.; Di Bello, A.; Varello, K.; et al. A pantropic canine coronavirus genetically related to the prototype isolate CB/05. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 159, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alfano, F.; Fusco, G.; Mari, V.; Occhiogrosso, L.; Miletti, G.; Brunetti, R.; Galiero, G.; Desario, C.; Cirilli, M.; Decaro, N. Circulation of pantropic canine coronavirus in autochthonous and imported dogs, Italy. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vlasova, A.N.; Diaz, A.; Damtie, D.; Xiu, L.; Toh, T.H.; Lee, J.S.Y.; Saif, L.J.; Gray, G.C. Novel canine coronavirus isolated from a hospitalized patient with pneumonia in East Malaysia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lednicky, J.A.; Tagliamonte, M.S.; White, S.K.; Blohm, G.M.; Alam, M.M.; Iovine, N.M.; Salemi, M.; Mavian, C.; Morris, J.G. Isolation of a novel recombinant canine coronavirus from a visitor to Haiti: Further evidence of transmission of coronaviruses of zoonotic origin to humans. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 75, e1184–e1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pratelli, A.; Tempesta, M.; Elia, G.; Martella, V.; Decaro, N.; Buonavoglia, C.; Buonavoglia, A.; Lanave, G.; Tempesta, M.; Camero, M.; et al. One world, one health, one virology of the mysterious labyrinth of coronaviruses: The canine coronavirus affair. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 2, e646–e647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Linnakoski, R.; Reshamwala, D.; Veteli, P.; Cortina-Escribano, M.; Vanhanen, H.; Marjomäki, V. Antiviral agents from fungi: Diversity, mechanisms and potential applications. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Roy, B.G. Potential of small-molecule fungal metabolites in antiviral chemotherapy. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2017, 25, 20–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nicoletti, R.; Manzo, E.; Ciavatta, M.L. Occurrence and bioactivities of funicone-related compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 1430–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Salvatore, M.M.; Dellagreca, M.; Andolfi, A. New insights into chemical and biological properties of funicone-like compounds. Toxins. 2022, 14, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nicoletti, R.; Scognamiglio, M.; Fiorentino, A. Structural and bioactive properties of 3-O-methylfunicone. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nakajima, S.; Watashi, K.; Kamisuki, S.; Tsukuda, S.; Takemoto, K.; Matsuda, M.; Suzuki, R.; Aizaki, H.; Sugawara, F.; Wakita, T. Specific inhibition of hepatitis C virus entry into host hepatocytes by fungi-derived sulochrin and its derivatives. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 440, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fiorito, F.; Cerracchio, C.; Salvatore, M.M.; Serra, F.; Pucciarelli, A.; Amoroso, M.G.; Nicoletti, R.; Andolfi, A. Antiviral property of the fungal metabolite 3-O-methylfunicone in bovine Herpesvirus 1 infection. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salvatore, M.M.; DellaGreca, M.; Nicoletti, R.; Salvatore, F.; Vinale, F.; Naviglio, D.; Andolfi, A. Talarodiolide, a new 12-membered macrodiolide, and GC/MS investigation of culture filtrate and mycelial extracts of Talaromyces pinophilus. Molecules 2018, 23, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vandenberg, L.N.; Colborn, T.; Hayes, T.B.; Heindel, J.J.; Jacobs, D.R.; Lee, D.H.; Shioda, T.; Soto, A.M.; vom Saal, F.S.; Welshons, W.V.; et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr. Rev. 2012, 33, 378–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cerracchio, C.; Serra, F.; Amoroso, M.G.; Fiorito, F. Canine coronavirus activates aryl hydrocarbon receptor during in vitro infection. Viruses 2022, 14, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thiemann, S.; Smit, N.; Strowig, T. Antibiotic resistance: Problems and new opportunities. In How to Overcome the Antibiotic Crisis Facts, Challenges, Technologies and Future Perspectives; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; Volume 398, pp. 1–236. ISBN 978-3-642-54826-0 978-3-642-54827-7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nicoletti, R. Antitumor and Immunomodulatory Compounds from Fungi. Encyclopedia of Mycology 2021, 2, 683–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Takahashi, J.A.; Barbosa, B.V.R.; Lima, M.T.N.S.; Cardoso, P.G.; Contigli, C.; Pimenta, L.P.S. Antiviral fungal metabolites and some insights into their contribution to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2021, 46, 116366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Saied, E.M.; El-Maradny, Y.A.; Osman, A.A.; Darwish, A.M.G.; Nahas, H.H.A.; Niedbała, G.; Piekutowska, M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Balbool, B.A.; Abdel-Azeem, A.M. A comprehensive review about the molecular structure of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Insights into natural products against COVID-19. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Belachew, A.M.; Feyisa, A.; Mohamed, S.B.; W/Mariam, J.F. Investigating fungi-derived bioactive molecules as inhibitor of the SARS coronavirus papain like protease: Computational based study. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 752095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rao, P.; Shukla, A.; Parmar, P.; Rawal, R.M.; Patel, B.; Saraf, M.; Goswami, D. Reckoning a fungal metabolite, pyranonigrin A as a potential Main protease (Mpro) inhibitor of novel SARS-CoV-2 virus identified using docking and molecular dynamics simulation. Biophys. Chem. 2020, 264, 106425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rao, P.; Patel, R.; Shukla, A.; Parmar, P.; Rawal, R.M.; Saraf, M.; Goswami, D. Identifying structural–functional analogue of GRL0617, the only well-established inhibitor for papain-like protease (PLpro) of SARS-CoV2 from the pool of fungal metabolites using docking and molecular dynamics simulation. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ebrahimi, K.S.; Ansari, M.; Hosseyni Moghaddam, M.S.; Ebrahimi, Z.; Salehi, Z.; Shahlaei, M.; Moradi, S. In silico investigation on the inhibitory effect of fungal secondary metabolites on RNA dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-II: A docking and molecular dynamic simulation study. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 135, 104613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Watashi, K.; Hijikata, M.; Hosaka, M.; Yamaji, M.; Shimotohno, K. Cyclosporin A suppresses replication of hepatitis C virus genome in cultured hepatocytes. Hepatology 2003, 38, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, H.S.; Kuok, D.I.T.; Cheung, M.C.; Ng, M.M.T.; Ng, K.C.; Hui, K.P.Y.; Peiris, J.S.M.; Chan, M.C.W.; Nicholls, J.M. Effect of interferon alpha and cyclosporine treatment separately and in combination on Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) replication in a human in-vitro and ex-vivo culture model. Antivir. Res. 2018, 155, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. de Wilde, A.H.; Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J.C.; van der Meer, Y.; Thiel, V.; Narayanan, K.; Makino, S.; Snijder, E.J.; van Hemert, M.J. Cyclosporin A inhibits the replication of diverse coronaviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2011, 92, 2542–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sanders, J.M.; Monogue, M.L.; Jodlowski, T.Z.; Cutrell, J.B. Pharmacologic treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A review. JAMA—J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020, 323, 1824–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Singh, S.B.; Jayasuriya, H.; Dewey, R.; Polishook, J.D.; Dombrowski, A.W.; Zink, D.L.; Guan, Z.; Collado, J.; Platas, G.; Pelaez, F.; et al. Isolation, structure, and HIV-1-integrase inhibitory activity of structurally diverse fungal metabolites. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 30, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Singh, S.; Malik, B.K.; Sharma, D.K. Targeting HIV-1 through molecular modeling and docking studies of CXCR4: Leads for therapeutic development. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007, 69, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ruggieri, A.; Di Trani, L.; Gatto, I.; Franco, M.; Vignolo, E.; Bedini, B.; Elia, G.; Buonavoglia, C. Canine coronavirus induces apoptosis in cultured cells. Vet. Microbiol. 2007, 121, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Martino, L.; Marfé, G.; Longo, M.; Fiorito, F.; Montagnaro, S.; Iovane, V.; Decaro, N.; Pagnini, U. Bid cleavage, cytochrome c release and caspase activation in canine coronavirus-induced apoptosis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 141, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marfè, G.; Tafani, M.; Fiorito, F.; Pagnini, U.; Iovane, G.; de Martino, L. Involvement of FOXO transcription factors, TRAIL-FasL/Fas, and Sirtuin proteins family in canine coronavirus type II-induced apoptosis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tang, B.S.F.; Chan, K.H.; Cheng, V.C.C.; Yuen, K.Y. Comparative host gene transcription by microarray analysis early after infection of the Huh7 cell line by SARS coronavirus and human coronavirus 229E. Hong Kong Med. J. 2005, 15, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  39. Grunewald, M.E.; Shaban, M.G.; Mackin, S.R.; Fehr, A.R.; Perlman, S. Murine coronavirus infection activates the aryl hydrocarbon TCDD-inducible-PARP expression. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e01743-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Giovannoni, F.; Li, Z.; Remes-Lenicov, F.; Dávola, M.E.; Elizalde, M.; Paletta, A.; Ashkar, A.A.; Mossman, K.L.; Dugour, A.V.; Figueroa, J.M.; et al. AHR signaling is induced by infection with coronaviruses. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guarnieri, T. Hypothesis: Emerging roles for aryl hydrocarbon receptor in orchestrating CoV-2-related inflammation. Cells 2022, 11, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Torti, M.F.; Giovannoni, F.; Quintana, F.J.; García, C.C. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a modulator of anti-viral immunity. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 624293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fiorito, F.; Santamaria, R.; Irace, C.; De Martino, L.; Iovane, G. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and the viral infection. Environ. Res. 2017, 153, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Veiga-Parga, T.; Suryawanshi, A.; Rouse, B.T. Controlling viral immuno-inflammatory lesions by modulating aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Fiorito, F.; Pagnini, U.; De Martino, L.; Montagnaro, S.; Ciarcia, R.; Florio, S.; Pacilio, M.; Fucito, A.; Rossi, A.; Iovane, G.; et al. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin increases bovine herpesvirus type-1 (BHV-1) replication in Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells in vitro. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008, 103, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fiorito, F.; Ciarcia, R.; Granato, G.E.; Marfe, G.; Iovane, V.; Florio, S.; De Martino, L.; Pagnini, U. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin induced autophagy in a bovine kidney cell line. Toxicology 2011, 290, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Santamaria, R.; Fiorito, F.; Irace, C.; De Martino, L.; Maffettone, C.; Granato, G.E.; Di Pascale, A.; Iovane, V.; Pagnini, U.; Colonna, A. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin impairs iron homeostasis by modulating iron-related proteins expression and increasing the labile iron pool in mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2011, 1813, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Fiorito, F.; Nocera, F.P.; Cantiello, A.; Iovane, V.; Lambiase, S.; Piccolo, M.; Ferraro, M.G.; Santamaria, R.; De Martino, L. Bovine herpesvirus-1 infection in mouse neuroblastoma (Neuro-2A) cells. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 247, 108762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Leite, M.; Quinta-Costa, M.; Leite, P.S.; Guimarães, J.E. Critical evaluation of techniques to detect and measure cell death—Study in a model of UV radiation of the leukaemic cell line HL60. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 1999, 19, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kroemer, G.; Levine, B. Autophagic cell death: The story of a misnomer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zakeri, Z.; Lockshin, R.A. Cell death: History and future. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 615, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  52. Altamura, G.; Power, K.; Martano, M.; degli Uberti, B.; Galiero, G.; De Luca, G.; Maiolino, P.; Borzacchiello, G. Felis catus papillomavirus type-2 E6 binds to E6AP, promotes E6AP/p53 binding and enhances p53 proteasomal degradation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Decaro, N.; Elia, G.; Martella, V.; Campolo, M.; Mari, V.; Desario, C.; Lucente, M.S.; Lorusso, E.; Kanellos, T.; Gibbons, R.H.; et al. Immunity after natural exposure to enteric canine coronavirus does not provide complete protection against infection with the new pantropic CB/05 strain. Vaccine 2010, 28, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Amoroso, M.G.; Di Concilio, D.; Langellotti, A.L.; Martello, A.; Cioffi, B.; Suffredini, E.; Cozzi, L.; Russo, V.; Mauriello, G.; Di Pasquale, S.; et al. Quantitative Real-Time PCR and digital PCR to evaluate residual quantity of HAV in experimentally depurated mussels. Food Environ. Virol. 2021, 13, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tofani, S.; Ianiro, G.; De Sabato, L.; Monini, M.; Angeloni, G.; Ponterio, E.; D’Agostino, C.; Di Bari, M.A.; Valeri, M.; Di Bartolo, I. Detection and whole genome sequencing of murine norovirus in animal facility in Italy. Anim. Biotechnol. 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 11 01594 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of 3-O-methylfunicone (OMF).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of 3-O-methylfunicone (OMF).
Antibiotics 11 01594 g001
Antibiotics 11 01594 g002 550
Figure 2. Determination of IC50 of OMF at various concentrations and development of dose–response curve for A72 cells. (a) A72 cells exposed to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.5 μM) or OMF at various doses (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM) at 48 h of treatment. (b) Dose–response curve of A72 cells exposed to DMSO (0.5 μM) or OMF at indicated doses (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM). At 48 h after treatment, A72 cells were tested using an MTT assay. (c) Cell viability was determined using TB staining and counted using a light microscope. Scale bar 100 μm. Significant differences between control and OMF-exposed cells were indicated by probability p. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Determination of IC50 of OMF at various concentrations and development of dose–response curve for A72 cells. (a) A72 cells exposed to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.5 μM) or OMF at various doses (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM) at 48 h of treatment. (b) Dose–response curve of A72 cells exposed to DMSO (0.5 μM) or OMF at indicated doses (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM). At 48 h after treatment, A72 cells were tested using an MTT assay. (c) Cell viability was determined using TB staining and counted using a light microscope. Scale bar 100 μm. Significant differences between control and OMF-exposed cells were indicated by probability p. *** p < 0.001.
Antibiotics 11 01594 g002
Antibiotics 11 01594 g003 550
Figure 3. OMF reduced cell death during CCoV infection in A72 cells. (a) Cells infected with CCoV and exposed to OMF at various doses (0.5 and 1 μM) at 24 h after infection. (b) Dose–response curve of cells infected with CCoV, exposed to OMF (0.5 μM) for 48 h and tested using an MTT assay. (c) Dose–response curve of cells infected with CCoV, stained using TB and scored using a light microscope. Scale bar 100 μm. Significant differences between infected and OMF-exposed infected cells were indicated by probability p. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. OMF reduced cell death during CCoV infection in A72 cells. (a) Cells infected with CCoV and exposed to OMF at various doses (0.5 and 1 μM) at 24 h after infection. (b) Dose–response curve of cells infected with CCoV, exposed to OMF (0.5 μM) for 48 h and tested using an MTT assay. (c) Dose–response curve of cells infected with CCoV, stained using TB and scored using a light microscope. Scale bar 100 μm. Significant differences between infected and OMF-exposed infected cells were indicated by probability p. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Antibiotics 11 01594 g003
Antibiotics 11 01594 g004 550
Figure 4. OMF diminished signs of morphological cell death during CCoV infection in A72 cells. Cells were infected with CCoV, exposed or not to OMF. After 48 h of infection, cells were observed under a light microscope after Giemsa staining. Comparing cells unexposed to OMF to control groups, photomicrographs revealed no morphological changes. In CCoV-infected groups, several cells showed signs attributable to apoptosis, such as pyknotic nuclei and nuclear fragmentation (arrow), whereas in OMF-treated infected cells, few signs of apoptotic cell death were noticed (arrow). Scale bar 100 μm.
Figure 4. OMF diminished signs of morphological cell death during CCoV infection in A72 cells. Cells were infected with CCoV, exposed or not to OMF. After 48 h of infection, cells were observed under a light microscope after Giemsa staining. Comparing cells unexposed to OMF to control groups, photomicrographs revealed no morphological changes. In CCoV-infected groups, several cells showed signs attributable to apoptosis, such as pyknotic nuclei and nuclear fragmentation (arrow), whereas in OMF-treated infected cells, few signs of apoptotic cell death were noticed (arrow). Scale bar 100 μm.
Antibiotics 11 01594 g004
Antibiotics 11 01594 g005 550
Figure 5. OMF diminished virus titer during CCoV infection in A72 cells. For viral growth curves, A72 cells were infected with CCoV at a MOI of five, exposed or not to OMF. At indicated times post infection, virus titers were assessed using RT-qPCR. Significant differences between CCoV-infected cells and OMF-treated infected cells were shown by probability p. *** p < 0.001 and * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. OMF diminished virus titer during CCoV infection in A72 cells. For viral growth curves, A72 cells were infected with CCoV at a MOI of five, exposed or not to OMF. At indicated times post infection, virus titers were assessed using RT-qPCR. Significant differences between CCoV-infected cells and OMF-treated infected cells were shown by probability p. *** p < 0.001 and * p < 0.05.
Antibiotics 11 01594 g005
Antibiotics 11 01594 g006 550
Figure 6. OMF downregulated the expression of AhR. (a) A72 uninfected group expressed AhR. OMF at a concentration of 0.5 μM markedly reduced the expression of AhR. Scale bar 100 µm. (b) Bars indicate the mean ratio produced from the integrated density in the expression of AhR assessed using ImageJ. Error bars correspond to standard error quantification.
Figure 6. OMF downregulated the expression of AhR. (a) A72 uninfected group expressed AhR. OMF at a concentration of 0.5 μM markedly reduced the expression of AhR. Scale bar 100 µm. (b) Bars indicate the mean ratio produced from the integrated density in the expression of AhR assessed using ImageJ. Error bars correspond to standard error quantification.
Antibiotics 11 01594 g006
Antibiotics 11 01594 g007 550
Figure 7. OMF decreased AhR and NP expression during CCoV infection in A72 cells. Cells were infected with CCoV at a MOI of five, and exposed or not to OMF; at 24 h after infection, IF staining to detect AhR (red fluorescence) and NP (green fluorescence) was carried out. (a) In OMF-exposed groups, the expression of AhR and NP was extremely decreased during CCoV infection. Scale bar 100 μm. (b) Bars correspond to the mean ratio obtained from the integrated density in the expression of AhR calculated using ImageJ. Error bars correspond to standard error quantification. (c) Bars correspond to the mean ratio obtained from the integrated density in the expression of NP calculated using ImageJ. Error bars correspond to standard error quantification.
Figure 7. OMF decreased AhR and NP expression during CCoV infection in A72 cells. Cells were infected with CCoV at a MOI of five, and exposed or not to OMF; at 24 h after infection, IF staining to detect AhR (red fluorescence) and NP (green fluorescence) was carried out. (a) In OMF-exposed groups, the expression of AhR and NP was extremely decreased during CCoV infection. Scale bar 100 μm. (b) Bars correspond to the mean ratio obtained from the integrated density in the expression of AhR calculated using ImageJ. Error bars correspond to standard error quantification. (c) Bars correspond to the mean ratio obtained from the integrated density in the expression of NP calculated using ImageJ. Error bars correspond to standard error quantification.
Antibiotics 11 01594 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cerracchio, C.; Iovane, V.; Salvatore, M.M.; Amoroso, M.G.; Dakroub, H.; DellaGreca, M.; Nicoletti, R.; Andolfi, A.; Fiorito, F. Effectiveness of the Fungal Metabolite 3-O-Methylfunicone towards Canine Coronavirus in a Canine Fibrosarcoma Cell Line (A72). Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111594

AMA Style

Cerracchio C, Iovane V, Salvatore MM, Amoroso MG, Dakroub H, DellaGreca M, Nicoletti R, Andolfi A, Fiorito F. Effectiveness of the Fungal Metabolite 3-O-Methylfunicone towards Canine Coronavirus in a Canine Fibrosarcoma Cell Line (A72). Antibiotics. 2022; 11(11):1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cerracchio, Claudia, Valentina Iovane, Maria Michela Salvatore, Maria Grazia Amoroso, Hiba Dakroub, Marina DellaGreca, Rosario Nicoletti, Anna Andolfi, and Filomena Fiorito. 2022. "Effectiveness of the Fungal Metabolite 3-O-Methylfunicone towards Canine Coronavirus in a Canine Fibrosarcoma Cell Line (A72)" Antibiotics 11, no. 11: 1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop