Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of the Conductivity and Uniformity of Silver Nanowire Flexible Transparent Conductive Films by Femtosecond Laser-Induced Nanowelding
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement of Single-Photon Emission Rate from InGaAs/GaAs Quantum-Dot/Nanowire Heterostructure by Wire-Groove Nanocavity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/nano9050672
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of a Novel SERS Platform Based on Mantis Wing with High-Density and Multi-Level “Hot Spots”

by
Mingli Wang
1,
Guochao Shi
1,*,
Junlin Zhu
2,
Yanying Zhu
1,
Xin Sun
1,
Peng Wang
3,*,
Tifeng Jiao
2,* and
Ruifeng Li
1
1
State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science & Technology and Key Laboratory for Microstructural Material Physics of Hebei Province, School of Science, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
2
Hebei Key Laboratory of Applied Chemistry, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(5), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9050672
Submission received: 18 March 2019 / Revised: 16 April 2019 / Accepted: 22 April 2019 / Published: 1 May 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The recent development of SERS substrates based on irregular nanostructures for directly molecule recognition has aroused increasing attention. By combining the irregular flake-like nanostructures of mantis wings, high SERS performance of Ag nanofilms, and the chemical stability of Au nanoparticles (NPs), an ultra-sensitive and flexible SERS substrate based on Au NPs functionalized Ag nanofilms-mantis wings (Au-Ag-M.w.) hybrid system is successfully fabricated. When 4-aminothiophenol is selected as the probe molecule, the limit of detection (LOD) is as low as 10−13 M and the relative standard deviation (RSD) is lower than 7.15%. This novel SERS platform exhibits high SERS performance in terms of sensitivity, reproducibility and practicability mainly because there are high-density and multi-level “hot spots” in the appropriate nanogaps. Meanwhile, it also systematically compares the differences of the SERS performance of Cu and Ag decorated M.w. hybrids and how these differences can alter their response. Moreover, the proposed substrate is employed to rapidly detect the pesticide residues on apple peels and the LOD for cypermethrin is estimated at 10−10 mg/mL. Therefore, this novel SERS substrate has great potential in rapid sampling of pesticide residues on real samples and expands the investigation to other natural materials for fabricating various SERS platforms.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Raman scattering spectroscopy is a rapid, nondestructive and qualitative analysis tool which can provide vibrational and rotational information of a molecule [1]. Recent years have witnessed an escalating research interest in SERS technology [2,3,4]. Compared with the conventional Raman scattering spectroscopy, this highly surface-sensitive analytical technique can directly provide information of various target molecules at very low concentrations or even single molecule level. Due to the high-performance and label-free detection of the probe molecules, SERS has great application prospects in the fields of biosensing, food safety, environmental monitoring, etc. [5,6,7]. In addition to the high sensitivity, SERS technique possesses another advantage in the high enhancement of Raman signal intensity. It is widely accepted that there are two major mechanisms that contribute to SERS enhancement. One is chemical enhancement (CM), and this enhancement mechanism is mainly based on the transfer effect of dynamic charge between the analytes and plasmonic nanostructures [8]; the other, electromagnetic enhancement mechanism (EM), originating from the sharp increase of local electromagnetic field at appropriate nanostructural junctions (“hot spots”) excited by localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), can provide Raman signal over several orders of magnitude higher than the CM [9]. In principle, the dramatically enhanced Raman signals can be sharply magnified as higher as a factor of | E | 4 [10].
In general, coinage metals such as Au, Ag and Cu with specific plasmonic nanostructures are the most popular SERS platforms [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Particularly, noble metal Ag, due to its clear LSPR absorption in the spectral regions from visible spectrum to near-infrared light [17,18,19,20], has been designed as effective plasmonic nanostructures to realize highly sensitive SERS detection. In literature, diverse technologies to achieve high-performance plasmonic nanoarrays have been reported, such as nanosphere lithography [21], electron-beam lithography [22], focused ion-beam lithography [23], laser direct writing [24], casting and solidification process [25] etc. These nanostructures can provide abundant “hot spots” and excite a high LSPR effect, but the complex and time-consuming experimental processes, strict experimental conditions, low-throughput fabrication processes further limit the widespread application in real-life detection. Although many works have been done to overcome these disadvantages [26,27,28], the application prospect is not clear yet. In other words, the manageable, high-producing and low-cost synthesis of SERS substrates with large-scale plasmonic arrays is still a big challenge.
Recently, plenty of scientific researches have confirmed that the natural world possesses multifunctional nanomaterials and nanostructures which can be applied in SERS applications due to the unique surface characteristics and low-cost acquirement of biomaterials. Meanwhile, considerable research efforts have suggested that simply modified with noble metals, biomaterials such as insect wings and plant leaves show excellent SERS effect for simultaneous determination of multi-molecules. For example, Mu et al. reported a novel SERS platform based on Au NPs/butterfly wing (Morpho, Papilio and Ornithoptera) as flexible and adhesive SERS substrate. The high-performance SERS substrate was employed to detect 4-aminothiophenol and the LOD was as low as 10−9 M [29]. According to Lv’s work, the recyclable SERS platform with abundant nanogaps was designed based on the cicada wings (Cryptotympana atrata) and it was successfully applied in detection of pesticide residues [30]. By using a textured taro leaf (collected from Himachal Pradesh, India) as a template, Kumar’s group fabricated a flexible SERS sensor by decorating Ag on the PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) substrate which was duplicated from a Taro leaf [25]. The results revealed that high sensitivity (10−11 M for malachite green) and well reproducibility of Raman signals were due to the super-hydrophobicity and flexible surface. That is to say the SERS performance can be enhanced by the hydrophobic surface. Specifically, when a droplet of probe molecule solution is placed on the hydrophobic nanomaterial, the droplet will form to be a near-spherical shape. After evaporation, the probe molecules are highly concentrated into a tiny area, resulting in high sensitivity. In addition to high sensitivity, excellent Raman enhancement and super-hydrophobicity, these biomaterial-based SERS substrates possess another advantage in flexibility. They offer advantages over traditional rigid substrates in their flexibility and can sense analytes on the surface of non-planar geometries. What’s more, they possess excellent mechanical strain resistance and can be easily tailored into any desired shapes and sizes. This point has been well demonstrated and analyzed by many reported flexible SERS substrates [31,32,33].
Fascinated by the flexible and hydrophobic bio-materials, we selected M.w. nanoarrays as bio-templates to fabricate an Au/Ag-decorated natural SERS substrate. As shown in Figure 1, the irregular flake-like nanoarray was first cleaned in deionized water. Afterward, the Ag nanofilms were sputtered on the M.w. by magnetron sputtering. Au NPs were decorated on the Ag-M.w. arrays via a simple physical deposition approach. Compared to the SERS-active substrates prepared by complex methods, our approach to fabricate the novel Au-Ag-M.w. substrate was facile and low-cost. Meanwhile, the Au NPs and Ag nanofilms on the densely packed nanoarray could provide the high-density and multi-level “hot spots”, thus ensuring high enhancement of Raman signals compared to the Cu-M.w. substrate reported previously [34]. Finally, due to the flexible surface, the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 (the sputtering time was 20 min) substrates were employed in the label-free detection of cypermethrin on apple peels via a direct and simple “contact scanning” method. The successful detection of cypermethrin on real samples indicates that the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates show great potential for practical applications in the field of biochemical sensing and food monitoring.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Instruments

Silver target (99.99%) was obtained from China Material Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanchang, China) M.w.s (Hierodula, Mantodea, Mantidae) were purchased from Beijing Jiaying Grand Life Sciences Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Experiments with mantis wings complied with the accepted ethical standards and were approved by the Ethical Review Board of Yanshan University on 15 January 2018. R6G, 4-aminothiophenol and cypermethrin were obtained from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China). AuCl3·HCl·4H2O (99.8%) and Na3C6H5O7·2H2O (99.9%) were purchased from Tianjin Meizke Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Deionized water (18.25 MΩ) was used for all solution preparations.
Ag nanofilms were coated on the M.w.s by the DC magnetron sputtering system (DHRM-3) (Hangzhou Dahua instrument manufacturing Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China). The surface morphology and size distribution of different substrates were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (S-4800) (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The morphology and size of Au NPs were characterized by Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) (HT7700) (High-Technologies Corp., Ibaraki, Japan). Raman spectra of 4-aminothiophenol, R6G and cypermethrin were obtained by Raman system (inVia) (Renishaw, UK). The UV-vis absorption spectra were monitored by the UV-2550 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu (China) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.2. Sample Preparation

The M.w.s were dissected into approximately 1 × 1 cm2 and then cleansed by ethanol and deionized water for 10 min in turn to remove the organic contaminants. After natural drying, the Ag nanofilms were deposited. Sputtering process was carried in Argon gas with 99.9% purity and the vacuum degree of sputtering chamber was controlled at 2 × 10−2 mbar. The sputtering voltage was 90 V, the working current 170 mA. Au NPs were prepared by chemical reduction method according to modified Frens’s work [35]. The Au NPs were deposited on the Ag-M.w. substrate by physical deposition and dried in a vacuum drying oven. It should be pointed out that the terminologies to describe the samples of Ag-M.w. fabricated with the sputtering time of x min would be called Ag-M.w.-x substrate. Consistently, the Au-Ag-M.w.-x described these Ag-M.w.-x substrates decorated with Au NPs.

2.3. SERS Measurements

All the Raman spectra were obtained with a ×50 objective lens (NA = 0.75). For SERS measurements, the laser with the wavelength of 532 nm was used as the excitation source. The diameter of the laser spot was ~1 μm and the spectral resolution was about 1 cm−1. Meanwhile, the power of the laser was set at 0.1 mW to avoid structural changes due to laser heating. The diffraction grating was used 1800 lines/mm grating and the focal length was 250 mm. A 4-aminothiophenol stock solution of the concentration of 0.1 M has been used for further dilution from 10−2 M to 10−13 M. The 4-aminothiophenol aqueous solution (10 µL) was dropped on each fabricated SERS substrate prior to the SERS measurement, and dried in a vacuum drying oven at 40 °C for 5 min. The Raman spectra were recorded with an integrated accumulation time of 10 s. When dealing with the Raman data, a background removal algorithm was adopted, and the Raman spectra were smoothed to remove the disorderly peaks. In order to obtain a statistical result and reduce the influence caused by the laser, the Raman spectra were taken at five different areas of each sample and the collected Raman data were averaged.

2.4. Detection of Pesticide Residues on Apple Peels

The trace detection of cypermethrin on apple peels was followed Liu et al.’s method [36]. First, an apple was totally cleaned with deionized water and ethanol in order to remove the contaminants on the surface. After the evaporation, the thin peels were taken from apple and cut into uniform squares of 1 × 1 cm2. Subsequently, 10 μL different concentrations of cypermethrin solutions were separately dropped onto the peel samples with a pipette. After natural drying, 10 μL ethanol solution was added onto the peels to extract the pesticide residues and increase the concentration of cypermethrin molecules at the outer surface. The next step was to press the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate to the treated sites and remained until completely dry and then peeled off for further analysis. In order to ensure the successful acquisition of Raman signals of cypermethrin, the measurements were performed five times randomly on the treated peels and the collected Raman data were averaged.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Comparing the SERS Substrates

In our previous report [34], we have successfully fabricated the Cu decorated M.w. SERS substrate. On this basis, in order to further improve the sensitivity, SERS enhancement and stability of M.w.-based SERS substrates, we chose silver material with the best response to electromagnetic enhancement as sputtering targets, and a series of Ag decorated M.w. substrates with different sputtering time were discussed. In order to evaluate the SERS performance of the Ag-M.w.-x substrates, 4-aminothiophenol, which has been widely applied in SERS detection, was chosen as the probe molecule due to its well established vibrational features. Figure 2a exhibits the Raman spectra of 10−4 M 4-aminothiophenol recorded from different Ag-M.w. substrates. The strong characteristic peaks of 4-aminothiophenol on the Ag-M.w.-x substrates were mainly centered at 1007, 1077, 1140, 1180, 1367, 1453, 1578 and 1650 cm−1 and the characteristic vibrational modes were given in Table 1 [37]. As shown in Figure 2a, the intensities of the Raman signal first increased with the increase of sputtering time and reached peak value at the time of 20 min, after which a marked decline of the Raman signal intensity was observed. The result indicated that the sputtering time of 20 min was the percolation threshold where the surface plasmon resonance was highly generated and dense “hot spots” could be significantly increased. Near the percolation threshold, the dense “hot spots” can be obtained, thus, amplifying the LSPR effect. It has been reported that the effective coupling effect of LSPR mostly occurred when the nanogaps between the noble metallic NPs were very small [38]. Therefore, we further stretched our experiments for the nanostructures of Au-Ag-M.w.-x to realize the coupling effect of two kinds of localized electromagnetic fields between Ag nanofilms and Au NPs. Hence, Au NPs with the average diameter of 30 ± 2 nm were deposited on the Ag-M.w.-x substrates to fabricate the Au-Ag-M.w.-x substrates. As shown in Figure 2b, the characteristic peaks of 10−4 M 4-aminothiophenol exhibited higher enhancement than those of Ag-M.w.-x hybrids. More importantly, the trend of the Raman signal enhancement was in agreement with that of Ag-M.w.-x. As shown in Table 2, from the increase factors we could conclude that the SERS enhanced effect of the Au-Ag-M.w.-x substrates was much higher than those of the Ag-M.w.-x substrates, especially for Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate. This active result can be attributed to the successful assembly of AuNPs on the Ag nanofilm. And the SERS substrate obtained the high enhancement with the assist of Au NPs which created high-density electromagnetic “hot spots”. Compared with the optimal SERS substrate (Cu-M.w.-30) in the previous report, the SERS substrates in our work is better than that one in terms of SERS enhancement. The SERS spectra of 10−4 M 4-aminothiophenol adsorbed onto Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, Cu-M.w.-30 substrate as well as 4-aminothiophenol solid powder were all exhibited in Figure 2c. Selected the characteristic band of 1578 cm−1 for example, as shown in Figure 2d, although the cost of Cu-M.w.-30 is lower than that of Ag-M.w.-20 and Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, the SERS enhancement performance is visibly inferior to that of Ag and Au based SERS substrates. Especially for Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, and the SERS increase factor is 26.40 (943,311 to 35,773) and 6.19 (943,311 to 133,369) higher than the Cu-M.w.-30 and Ag-M.w.-20 substrate.

3.2. Morphology Characterization

The prepared flexible substrates were characterized by FE-SEM. As shown in Figure 3a, the surface of the M.w. was covered by a large number of randomly distributed irregular flake-like nanostructure. In addition, the image confirmed that these nanostructures consisted of vertical and interlaced nanoflakes whose size was ~100 ± 10 nm in width and 500–800 nm in length. These irregular distribution of nanostructures were linked together to form many nanoholes. This structural characteristics made the surface very rough and exhibited hydrophobic property. Generally, the novel irregular nanostructures can be regarded as natural plasmonic nanostructures if decorated with a thin layer of noble metal. Therefore, by using such hydrophobic M.w.s as bio-templates, we have designed and manufactured Cu-based SERS substrate in our previous report [34]. As shown in Figure 3b, by adjusting the sputtering time, the optimal Cu-M.w.-30 SERS substrate was obtained. The average width of the Cu nanofilm was about 300 ± 10 nm. To further optimize the M.w.-based plasmonic nanostructures, we continued to decorate the Ag nanofilm and Au NPs on this nanostructure. When the sputtering time was 20 min, the surface morphology was changed after Ag nanofilm coating. It could be obviously seen from Figure 3c that the vertical nanoflakes of Ag-M.w.-20 became thicker (~500 ± 10 nm) and the size of the nanohole therewith went down. The FE-SEM image of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate was shown in Figure 3d, large-scale Au NPs were decorated on the surface of the Ag-M.w.-20 template, which ensured the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate gain more appropriate nanogaps with high-density and multi-level “hot spots” for SERS performance. Figure 4a presents the TEM image of the Au NPs and the Au NPs were uniform in size. In order to better describe the Au NPs, the Nano Measurer software was applied to calculate the size and size distribution. As shown in Figure 4b, by counting 150 selected samples, the diameter of the Au NPs has a weak fluctuation. As the frequency distribution histograms presented in Figure 4c, the size distribution of Au NPs obeys the Gaussian distribution with the peak position centers at ~30 nm, which revealed that the average diameter of the Au NPs was 30 nm. In addition, the elemental mapping confirmed the successful decoration of Au NPs on the Ag-M.w.-20 surface. The elemental mappings of Ag (Figure 4d) and Au (Figure 4e) demonstrate a large-scale and uniform distribution of the Ag and Au elements. Enhanced UV-visible light absorption spectra of the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 and neat M.w. substrates were shown in Figure 4f. As we can see that the plasmon bands centered at ~251, 318 and 385 nm appeared. Although the wavelength of laser used in the Raman measurement (532 nm) is not matched with plasmon bands, the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate exhibited strong Raman enhanced signals. This may be related to the rough indication in UV-vis absorption spectra of the matching between the excitation source and the surface plasmon resonance [27].
Except for the rich collection effect resulted from the surface hydrophobicity, the types of noble metal materials and the LSPR effect excited near the nanostructure surface could also contribute to the electromagnetic field intensity [20]. Therefore, the 3D finite-difference time-domain (3D-FDTD) simulation method was introduced to simulate the intensity distribution of electromagnetic field. For the sake of accuracy, the length of the Ag nanofilm was set to be 300 nm, the diameter of the Au NPs was 30 nm and the nanogap between the Au NPs was 10 nm. Figure 5a exhibits the FE-SEM of the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, in which different angles (marked with red lines) could be observed. In this 3D-FDTD simulation, because the complex and irregular nanostructure is not easy to model and the Au NPs are very difficult to evenly distributed on the surface of Ag-M.w. substrates, we use this three typical angles (45°, 60° and 90°) to represent the nanostructure to study the electromagnetic field enhancement performance. Furthermore, a continuous square wave with a wavelength of 532 nm was selected as the incident light. We considered that the material of Au and Ag abided by Debye-Drude Model. Figure 5b–d show the calculated spatial distributions of electromagnetic field intensity for the Ag nanofilms crossed at 45°, 60° and 90°. The very strong electromagnetic field intensity was distributed almost at the nanogaps between the Au NPs and Ag nanofilms and a maximum EF of 62.18 V m−1 was obtained when the angle was 45°. In this case, the calculated EF was evaluated to be 1.49 × 107. Meanwhile, the model and the distribution of electromagnetic field intensity of Cu-M.w.-30 and Ag-M.w.-20 nanofilms with the angles crossed at 45° was also shown in Figure 5e–h. Obviously, the SERS enhancement of Cu-M.w.-30 (EF = 2.24 × 104) and Ag-M.w.-20 (EF = 8.07 × 105) were weaker than Au-Ag-M.w.-20 SERS-active substrates. Simulation analysis shows that the types of noble metal material, size and nanofilm separation were crucial to efficiently tune the SERS performance. On the other hand, the novel flake-like nanostructure and the synergistic effects of Ag nanofilms and Au NPs would all contribute to the major enhancement of the electromagnetic field.

3.3. SERS Performances of the Prepared Substrate

To further investigate the SERS sensitivity of the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, we tested the Raman spectra of 4-aminothiophenol solutions with different concentrations (from 10−9 M to 10−13 M). For comparison, the sensitivity of Ag-M.w.-20 substrate was also determined. As shown in Figure 6a,b, the intensities of Raman peaks of 4-aminothiophenol decayed with the decrease of 4-aminothiophenol concentrations. The Raman characteristic peaks of 4-aminothiophenol could be evidently observed in the Figure 6a even at the concentration of 10−13 M. The LOD for Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate was two orders of magnitude lower than that of the Ag-M.w.-20 substrate. It indicated that the sensitivity of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate was clearly superior to the Ag-M.w.-20 hybrid which allowed highly sensitive SERS detection. The better SERS behavior of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate can be attributed to the successful decoration of Au NPs. After decorated the Ag nanofilms with Au NPs, the little probe molecules solution could certainly flow into the tiny nanogaps and could be more enriched around the “hot spots”, thus, generating more sensitive SERS signals. Meanwhile, in our previous report, the LOD for 4-aminothiophenol of Cu-M.w.-30 substrate was 10−6 M as shown in Figure 6c, which was 7 orders of magnitude higher than the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate. This fully proves the superiority of the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate in sensitive detection. The relationships between the SERS intensity at 1650 cm−1 and the 4-aminothiophenol concentration were plotted in the logarithm scale in Figure 6d, where the good linear relation could be found. The inset was the liner relationship at 1474 cm−1 of 4-aminothiophenol recorded by Cu-M.w.-30 substrates. The values of the correlation coefficient (R2) reached 0.988, 0.979 and 0.976 suggested that these types of substrates could all allow for the quantitative determination of the unknown concentrations of 4-aminothiophenol, but there is no doubt that the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 is the best candidate.
In addition to the high sensitivity, the reproducibility of the Raman signals is a crucial parameter which affects the reliability in application. In general, the RSD value of the Raman signal intensity is usually calculated to evaluate the reproducibility of a SERS substrate. It has been widely confirmed that a RSD value of the SERS measurement less than 20% over micrometer-sized area indicated high reproducibility [39]. Therefore, the SERS mapping analysis was experimented on the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates and the obtained spectra were with 1 μm/point scan step and covered an area of 5 × 5 μm2. As shown in Figure 7a, the color bar on the right was proportional to the peak areas at 1361 cm−1 for 10−5 M R6G. Figure 7b shows the Raman signal intensity distribution of 25 points of the 1361 cm−1. The RSD value was calculated to be 6.41% according to the following Equation (1) [40]:
R S D = ∑ i = 1 n ( I i − I ¯ ) 2 n − 1 I ¯
where the I ¯ represents the average intensity of the Raman signal, n is 25 in agreement with the number of the measured spectrum, I i is the Raman intensity of each spectrum at the 1361 cm−1. Meanwhile, the substrate-to-substrate reproducibility was also measured at 25 randomly chosen points from 5 Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates. As shown in Figure 7c, the 25 spectra obtained from different points overlapped very well. The RSD values of three characteristic peaks at 1187, 1510 and 1647 cm−1 were calculated to be 5.53%, 7.15% and 5.93%, as shown in Figure 7d. The results fully indicated that the SERS substrate has outstanding reproducibility across the entire surface, which is likely to benefit from the dense distribution of the Au NPs and the homogenous Ag nanofilms coating on the SERS substrates. Furthermore, stability is another parameter for evaluating the SERS-active substrate. Therefore, the stability of the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates was tested by the detection of R6G with the concentration of 10−5 M. The Raman spectra of R6G from Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate for different detection times were displayed in Figure 8a. By calculating the peak intensity of 1610 cm−1, the Raman signal intensity fell only by 10.59% within 30 days. In consequence, our Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate possesses outstanding reproducibility well antioxidant stability compared to Cu-M.w.-30 substrate [34] which can be used in the practical application.

3.4. EF Calculation

Enhancement factor (EF) was calculated to further quantify the enhancement distribution of the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate according to the following equation [41]:
E F = [ I S E R S I R a m a n ] × [ N R a m a n N S E R S ]
where the ISERS and IRaman represent the integrated peak intensity of the SERS signal and the normal Raman signal, NSERS and NRaman are the number of the probe molecules on the substrates within the laser spot. Here, we chose the 10−3 M 4-aminothiophenol solution on the silicon wafer as the Raman substrate, while SERS substrate was used the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 hybrid with 10−9 M 4-aminothiophenol. Besides, the Raman characteristic band of 1367 cm−1 was chosen to calculate the integrated I values. As shown in Figure 8b1,b2, the value of ISERS and IRaman calculated to be 3.40 × 105 and 8.56 × 104, respectively. Therefore, the ratio ISERS/IRaman was equaled to ~3.98. The NRaman and NSERS can be calculated as followed [42]:
N = ( N A × M × V s o l u t i o n S s u b ) × S l a s e r
where NA and M are the Avogadro constant and molar concentration of the solution, Vsolution stands for the volume of the droplet of 4-aminothiophenol, Ssub denotes the size of the 4-aminothiophenol solution on the different substrates and Slaser is the size of the laser spot, respectively. In the Raman setup, the laser diameter was 1 μm, so the Slaser equaled 0.785 μm2 and the 4-aminothiophenol drop area on the silicon wafer is approximately 1.2-time larger than that on SERS substrate. Thus, the ratio of NRaman/NSERS was equaled to 8.3 × 105. Therefore, the SERS EF value of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate at the 1367 cm−1 band was ~3.30 × 106.

3.5. Collection of Pesticide Residues by Au-Ag-M.w.-20 Substrate

Multifarious pesticide residues are attracting more and more attention due to the potential harm to human health. Serious overdose of pesticide residues can cause acute intoxication, while mild pesticide residues chronically accumulated in human body can also cause many chronic diseases. At present, the widely used methods for pesticide residue detection are liquid chromatography [43], gas chromatography mass spectroscopy [44] and fluorescence analysis [45]. The accuracy of these methods is very high, but the pretreatment processes are very tedious, which is difficult to meet the rapid and on-spot detection in fruit and vegetables. Therefore, it is an urgent problem to investigate a rapid sampling and facile pesticide residue detection technology. To evaluate the real-world application of the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, cypermethrin was detected to test the SERS practicability of this bio-inspired substrate. The cypermethrin has been widely used in the planting process of the tea, fruits and vegetables. Once the exposure is large, it can cause headache, nausea, vomiting, coma and even shock. Therefore, developing a facile and rapid approach to sensitively and on-spot detect cypermethrin is necessary. The detailed detection of cypermethrin from apple peels was performed as described in the experimental section. Figure 9a shows the Raman spectra of cypermethrin ranging from 10−6 mg/mL to 10−10 mg/mL. The Raman peaks observed at 1077, 1182 and 1586 cm−1 were the fingerprint peaks of cypermethrin [46]. The Raman signals could still be observed from the inset of Figure 9a even when the concentration fell to 10−10 mg/mL, indicating highly sensitive detection capability of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate. Figure 9b,c shows the relationship between the integrated Raman signal intensities and the concentrations of cypermethrin. Obviously, as the concentration decreased, the peak intensity gradually decreased. In this case, there were linear relationships at 1077, 1182 and 1586 cm−1, which indicated the excellent quantitative evaluation of the cypermethrin as shown in Figure 9c. To further evaluate the reproducibility of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate in detecting of cypermethrin, the SERS spectra of 10−8 mg/mL cypermethrin were shown in Figure 9d, revealing high reproducibility of the Raman signal.
In addition, a 6 × 6 µm2 area on a random Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate was selected to test the SERS behaviors and the results were displayed in Figure 10a,b. The relatively uniform color distribution suggested that the outstanding step-to-step reproducibility of our Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates. Figure 10c,d quantitatively exhibited the intensity variation of 36 spots at 1077 and 1586 cm−1, respectively. Correspondingly, the RSD values were calculated to be 12.81% and 10.61% according to Equation (1). These results adequately revealed that the bio-inspired Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate possesses high practicality as well as credibility in real detection.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully fabricated a kind of ultra-sensitive and flexible SERS platform based on the irregular mantis wing nanoarray by magnetron sputtering technique and physical deposition method. With the 4-aminothiophenol as probe molecules, the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 SERS-active substrate exhibited the most remarkable SERS performance compared with single Cu or Ag nanofilms based hybrids, which could be ascribed to the large-scale “hot spots” that existed between the appropriate nanogaps. In addition, the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate could achieve sensitive SERS measurements with a linear range of the detection of 4-aminothiophenol and the signal reproducibility for R6G was well within 5.53%–7.15% variations. A practical application for the detection of cypermethrin on apple peels was conducted with a LOD reached to be 10−10 mg/mL. Therefore, the naturally inspired substrate showed high potential in real-life detection, which was expected to find application in food safety and environmental monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W.; Data curation, G.S. and P.W.; Formal analysis, X.S.; Funding acquisition, T.J.; Investigation, G.S. and J.Z.; Methodology, Y.Z.; Project administration, P.W.; Software, R.L.; Writing-original draft, M.W.; Writing-review & editing, Y.Z. and T.J.

Funding

This research was funded by [the National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [No. 51771162 & No. 21872119] and [Scientific and Technological Research Key Projects of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province] grant number [ZD2019060].

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude for the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nie, S.; Emory, S.R. Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface enhanced Raman scattering. Science 1997, 275, 1102–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cao, W.; Jiang, L.; Hu, J.; Wang, A.D.; Li, X.W.; Lu, Y.F. Optical field enhancement in Au nanoparticle-decorated nanorod arrays prepared by femtosecond laser and their tunable SERS applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 10, 297–1305. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, C.; Liu, B.X.; Dou, X.C. Silver nanotriangles-loaded filter paper for ultrasensitive SERS detection application benefited by interspacing of sharp edges. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2016, 231, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, J.; Liu, M.J.; Li, J.J.; Li, X.; Zhao, J.W. Multi-branched gold nanostars with fractal structure for SERS detection of the pesticide thiram. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2018, 189, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yan, X.Y.; Wang, M.L.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y.H.; Shi, G.C.; Ma, W.L.; Hou, P. Sandwich-like Ag@Cu@CW SERS substrate with tunable nanogaps and component based on the Plasmonic nanonodule structures for sensitive detection crystal violet and 4-aminothiophenol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 479, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Y.; Lu, R.; Shen, J.Y.; Han, W.Q.; Sun, X.Y.; Li, J.S.; Wang, L.J. Electrospun flexible poly (bisphenol A carbonate) nanofibers decorated with Ag nanoparticles as effective 3D SERS substrates for trace TNT detection. Analyst 2017, 142, 4756–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ilkhani, H.; Hughes, T.; Zhong, C.J.; Hepel, M. Nanostructured SERS-electrochemical biosensors for testing of anticancer drug interactions with DNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 80, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guerrini, L.; Graham, D. Molecularly-mediated assemblies of plasmonic nanoparticles for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7085–7107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baia, M.; Baia, L.; Astilean, S.; Popp, J. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering efficiency of truncated tetrahedral Ag nanoparticle arrays mediated by electromagnetic couplings. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 143121–143123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ru, E.C.L.; Etchegoin, P.G. Rigorous justification of the |E|4, enhancement factor in surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 423, 63–66. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wan, G.P.; Peng, X.G.; Zeng, M.; Yu, L.; Wang, K.; Li, X.Y.; Wang, G.Z. The preparation of Au@TiO2 yolk-shell nanostructure and its applications for degradation and detection of methylene blue. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, K.Y.; Yan, X.Y.; Li, J.K.; Jiao, T.F.; Cai, C.; Zou, G.D.; Wang, R.; Wang, M.L.; Zhang, L.X.; Peng, Q.M. Preparation of self-assembled composite films constructed by chemically-modified MXene and dyes with surface-enhanced Raman scattering characterization. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Velleman, L.; Scarabelli, L.; Sikdar, D.; Kornyshev, A.A.; Liz-Marzán, L.M.; Edel, J.B. Monitoring plasmon coupling and SERS enhancement through in situ nanoparticle spacing modulation. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 205, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shi, G.C.; Wang, M.L.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Yan, X.Y.; Sun, X.; Xu, H.J.; Ma, W.L. Biomimetic synthesis of Ag-coated glasswing butterfly arrays as ultra-sensitive SERS substrates for efficient trace detection of pesticides. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, W.S.; Sun, I.W.; Huang, C.C. Promotion of SERS and catalytic activities with bimetallic and ternary concave nanolayers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 13041–13049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hong, W.E.; Hsu, I.L.; Huang, S.Y.; Lee, C.W.; Ko, H.; Tsai, P.J.; Shiehcd, D.B.; Huang, C.C. Assembled growth of 3D Fe3O4@Au nanoparticles for efficient photothermal ablation and SERS detection of microorganisms. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 5689–5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Z.L.; Si, T.T.; Liu, J.; Zhou, G.W. In-situ grown silver nanoparticles on nonwoven fabrics based on mussel-inspired polydopamine for highly sensitive SERS Carbaryl pesticides detection. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tseng, M.L.; Huang, Y.W.; Hsiao, M.K.; Huang, H.W.; Chen, H.M.; Chen, Y.L.; Chu, C.H.; Chu, N.N.; He, Y.J.; Chang, C.M.; et al. Fast fabrication of a Ag nanostructure substrate using the femtosecond laser for broad-band and tunable plasmonic enhancement. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5190–5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kneipp, K.; Wang, Y.; Kneipp, H.; Perelman, L.T.; Itzkan, I.; Dasari, R.R.; Feld, M.S. Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering(SERS). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 667–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, B.B.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhang, W.Y.; Liu, X.Q.; Wang, J.N.; Zhang, X.L.; Zhang, D.D.; Jiang, H.B.; Zhang, R.; Sun, H.B. Silver-coated rose petal: Green, facile, low-cost and sustainable fabrication of a SERS substrate with unique superhydrophobicity and high efficiency. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2013, 1, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, J.A.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.J.; He, L.F.; Wong, T.L.; Chui, Y.S.; Lee, S.T. Ordered Ag/Si nanowires array: Wide-range surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for reproducible biomolecule detection. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5039–5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brolo, A.G.; Arctander, E.; Gordon, R. Nanohole-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nano. Lett. 2004, 4, 2015–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, D.; Crozier, K.B.; Zhu, W. Double resonance surface enhanced Raman scattering substrates: An intuitive coupled oscillator model. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 14919–14928. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu, B.B.; Ma, Z.C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, R.; Niu, L.G.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zheng, W.H.; Zhao, B.; Xu, Y.; et al. Localized flexible integration of high-efficiency surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) monitors into microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 2011, 11, 3347–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kumar, P.; Khosla, R.; Soni, M.; Deva, D.; Sharma, S.K. A highly sensitive, flexible SERS sensor for malachite green detection based on Ag decorated microstructured PDMS substrate fabricated from Taro leaf as template. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aybeke, E.N.; Belliot, G.; Lemaire-Ewing, S.; Estienney, M.; Lacroute, Y.; Pothier, P.; Bourillot, E.; Lesniewska, E. HS-AFM and SERS analysis of murine norovirus infection: Involvement of the lipid rafts. Small 2016, 13, 1600918–1600927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ionescu, R.E.; Aybeke, E.N.; Bourillot, E.; Lacroute, Y.; Lesniewska, E.; Adam, P.; Bijeon, J. Fabrication of annealed gold nanostructures on pre-treated glow-discharge cleaned glasses and their used for localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) detection of adsorbed (bio)molecules. Sensors 2017, 17, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aybeke, E.N.; Lacroute, Y.; Elie-Caille, C.; Bouhelier, A.; Bourillot, E.; Lesniewska, E. Homogeneous large-scale crystalline nanoparticle-covered substrate with high SERS performance. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 245302–245308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mu, Z.D.; Zhao, X.W.; Xie, Z.Y.; Zhao, Y.J.; Zhong, Q.F.; Bo, L.; Gu, Z.Z. In situ synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in butterfly wings for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 1607–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lv, M.Y.; Teng, H.Y.; Chen, Z.Y.; Zhao, Y.M.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Wu, Z.L.; Liu, L.M.; Xu, H.J. Low-cost Au nanoparticle-decorated cicada wing as sensitive and recyclable substrates for surface enhanced Raman scattering. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 2015, 209, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, K.C.; Wang, Z.Y.; Tan, C.F.; Kang, N.; Chen, L.W.; Ren, L.; Thian, E.S.; Ho, G.W.; Ji, R.; Hong, M.H. Uniaxially stretched flexible surface plasmon resonance film for versatile surface enhanced Raman scattering diagnostics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 26341–26349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, C.W.; Ko, H.; Chang, G.S.H.; Huang, C.C. Invisible-ink-assisted pattern and written surfaceenhanced Raman scattering substrates for versatile chem/biosensing platforms. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 5318–5326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yokota, T.; Zalar, P.; Kaltenbrunner, M.; Jinno, H.; Matsuhisa, N.; Kitanosako, H.; Tachibana, Y.; Yukita, W.; Koizumi, M.; Someya, T. Ultraflexible organic photonic skin. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, R.F.; Shi, G.C.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, M.L.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Sun, X.; Xu, H.J.; Chang, C.X. Decoration of Cu films on the microstructural mantis wing as flexible substrates for surface enhanced Raman scattering. Optik 2018, 172, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Frens, G. Controlled nucleation for regulation of particle-size in monodisperse gold suspensions. Nature 1973, 241, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, B.H.; Han, G.M.; Zhang, Z.P.; Liu, R.Y.; Jiang, C.L.; Wang, S.H.; Han, M.Y. Shell thickness-dependent Raman enhancement for rapid identification and detection of pesticide residues at fruit peels. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, K.; Yoon, J.K. Raman scattering of 4-aminobenzenethiol sandwiched between Ag/Au nanoparticle and macroscopically smooth Au substrate. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 20731–20736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oh, S.H.; Im, C.H.; Lindquist, N.C.; Haynes, C.L.; Bantz, S.K. Vertically oriented sub-10-nm plasmonic nanogap arrays. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2231–2236. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, B.H.; Wang, H.S.; Lu, L.H.; Ai, K.L.; Zhang, G.; Cheng, X.L. Large-area silver-coated silicon nanowire arrays for molecular sensing using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 18, 2348–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Parsons, H.M.; Ekman, D.R.; Collette, T.W.; Viant, M.R. Spectral relative standard deviation: A practical benchmark in metabolomics. Analyst 2009, 134, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.T.; Shi, W.S.; She, G.W.; Mu, L.X. High-performance surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensors based on Ag nanoparticles-coated Si nanowire arrays for quantitative detection of pesticides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 053104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, M.F.; Meng, J.T.; Wang, D.P.; Tang, Q.; Chen, T.; Rong, S.Z.; Liu, J.Q.; Wu, Y.C. Biomimetic synthesis of hierarchical 3D Ag butterfly wing scale arrays/graphene composites as ultrasensitive SERS substrates for efficient trace chemical detection. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 1933–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Becker, C.; Jochmann, M.A.; Schmidt, T.C. An overview of approaches in liquid chromatography flame ionization detection. TrAC Trend Anal. Chem. 2019, 110, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tranchida, P.Q.; Aloisi, I.; Giocastro, B.; Mondello, L. Current state of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with focus on processes of ionization. TrAC Trend Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pashkova, G.V.; Smagunova, A.N.; Finkelshtein, A.L. X-ray fluorescence analysis of milk and dairy products: A review. TrAC Trend Anal. Chem. 2018, 106, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.H.; Wang, M.L.; Sun, X.; Shi, G.C.; Zhang, J.Z.; Ma, W.L.; Ren, L.J. Grating-like SERS substrate with tunable gaps based on nanorough Ag nanoislands/moth wing scale arrays for quantitative detection of cypermethrin. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 22168–22181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of the Au-Ag-M.w. nanoarray and SERS measurement by Raman system.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of the Au-Ag-M.w. nanoarray and SERS measurement by Raman system.
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g001
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g002 550
Figure 2. Raman spectra of 10−4 M 4-aminothiophenol on Ag-M.w.-x (a) and Au-Ag-M.w.-x substrates (b) prepared with different sputtering time and corresponding neat substrate spectra without 4-aminothiophenol absorbed; (c) Raman spectra of 10−4 M 4-aminothiophenol recorded from Cu-M.w.-30, Ag-M.w.-20 and Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, respectively; (d) Comparison of Raman signal intensities at 1578 cm−1 of different substrates.
Figure 2. Raman spectra of 10−4 M 4-aminothiophenol on Ag-M.w.-x (a) and Au-Ag-M.w.-x substrates (b) prepared with different sputtering time and corresponding neat substrate spectra without 4-aminothiophenol absorbed; (c) Raman spectra of 10−4 M 4-aminothiophenol recorded from Cu-M.w.-30, Ag-M.w.-20 and Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate, respectively; (d) Comparison of Raman signal intensities at 1578 cm−1 of different substrates.
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g002
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g003 550
Figure 3. The FE-SEM images of M.w. before (a) and after 30 min Cu (b) and 20 min Ag (c) deposition; (d) The FE-SEM image of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate.
Figure 3. The FE-SEM images of M.w. before (a) and after 30 min Cu (b) and 20 min Ag (c) deposition; (d) The FE-SEM image of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate.
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g003
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) TEM image of the Au NPs; The size (b) and size distribution (c) of the Au NPs; Elemental mapping of Ag (d) and Au (e) of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (f) UV-vis spectra of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 and neat M.w. substrate.
Figure 4. (a) TEM image of the Au NPs; The size (b) and size distribution (c) of the Au NPs; Elemental mapping of Ag (d) and Au (e) of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (f) UV-vis spectra of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 and neat M.w. substrate.
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g004
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) FE-SEM image of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (b–d) 3D-FDTD simulated electromagnetic field enhancement of crossed-nanofilms with the angle at (b) 45°, (c) 60° and (d) 90°, respectively; (e) and (g) 3D-FDTD models of Cu-M.w.-30 and Ag-M.w.-20 with an angle of 45°; (f) and (h) Spatial distributions of the electromagnetic field intensities around corresponding substrates.
Figure 5. (a) FE-SEM image of Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (b–d) 3D-FDTD simulated electromagnetic field enhancement of crossed-nanofilms with the angle at (b) 45°, (c) 60° and (d) 90°, respectively; (e) and (g) 3D-FDTD models of Cu-M.w.-30 and Ag-M.w.-20 with an angle of 45°; (f) and (h) Spatial distributions of the electromagnetic field intensities around corresponding substrates.
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g005
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g006 550
Figure 6. Raman spectra of 4-aminothiophenol with different concentrations recorded from Au-Ag-M.w.-20 (a), Ag-M.w.-20 (b) and Cu-M.w.-30 substrates (c); (d) linear calibration plot between the SERS intensities and 4-aminothiophenol concentrations in the logarithm scale of Cu-M.w.-30, Ag-M.w.-20 and Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates, respectively (the error bars were calculated based on 5 independent measurements).
Figure 6. Raman spectra of 4-aminothiophenol with different concentrations recorded from Au-Ag-M.w.-20 (a), Ag-M.w.-20 (b) and Cu-M.w.-30 substrates (c); (d) linear calibration plot between the SERS intensities and 4-aminothiophenol concentrations in the logarithm scale of Cu-M.w.-30, Ag-M.w.-20 and Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates, respectively (the error bars were calculated based on 5 independent measurements).
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g006
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) the Raman mapping after the 10−5 M R6G dried on the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (b) the main Raman vibrational intensities of 10−5 M R6G at the characteristic Raman peak of 1361 cm−1 (the height of the histogram represents the peak intensity); (c) SERS spectra of 10−5 M R6G obtained from 25 randomly selected spots on 5 Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (d) the peak intensities of Raman band at 1187, 1510 and 1647 cm−1 and the corresponding RSD values (the value of the ordinate is the peak intensity).
Figure 7. (a) the Raman mapping after the 10−5 M R6G dried on the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (b) the main Raman vibrational intensities of 10−5 M R6G at the characteristic Raman peak of 1361 cm−1 (the height of the histogram represents the peak intensity); (c) SERS spectra of 10−5 M R6G obtained from 25 randomly selected spots on 5 Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (d) the peak intensities of Raman band at 1187, 1510 and 1647 cm−1 and the corresponding RSD values (the value of the ordinate is the peak intensity).
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g007
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g008 550
Figure 8. SERS signals of R6G with the concentration of 10−5 M on the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates under the exposure to the ambient temperatures for 0 day (a1), 15 days (a2) and 30 days (a3); (b1) SERS spectrum of 10−9 M 4-aminothiophenol solution acquired from Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (b2) normal Raman spectrum of 10−3 M 4-aminothiophenol solution.
Figure 8. SERS signals of R6G with the concentration of 10−5 M on the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrates under the exposure to the ambient temperatures for 0 day (a1), 15 days (a2) and 30 days (a3); (b1) SERS spectrum of 10−9 M 4-aminothiophenol solution acquired from Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate; (b2) normal Raman spectrum of 10−3 M 4-aminothiophenol solution.
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g008
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) SERS spectra of cypermethrin with different concentrations collected from apple peels; (b) Corresponding SERS intensities of main peaks at different concentrations; (c) Linear calibration plot between SERS intensity and cypermethrin concentration; (d) SERS spectra of 10−8 mg/mL cypermethrin collected from 6 apple peels samples by using the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate.
Figure 9. (a) SERS spectra of cypermethrin with different concentrations collected from apple peels; (b) Corresponding SERS intensities of main peaks at different concentrations; (c) Linear calibration plot between SERS intensity and cypermethrin concentration; (d) SERS spectra of 10−8 mg/mL cypermethrin collected from 6 apple peels samples by using the Au-Ag-M.w.-20 substrate.
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g009
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g010 550
Figure 10. SERS mapping of the peaks across a 6 × 6 µm2 area measured at: (a) 1077 cm−1 and (b) 1586 cm−1 for cypermethrin; (c,d) the main Raman vibrational intensities of 10−8 mg/mL cypermethrin at characteristic Raman peaks (c: 1077 cm−1; d: 1586 cm−1).
Figure 10. SERS mapping of the peaks across a 6 × 6 µm2 area measured at: (a) 1077 cm−1 and (b) 1586 cm−1 for cypermethrin; (c,d) the main Raman vibrational intensities of 10−8 mg/mL cypermethrin at characteristic Raman peaks (c: 1077 cm−1; d: 1586 cm−1).
Nanomaterials 09 00672 g010
Table
Table 1. Experimental assignments of vibrations of 4-aminothiophenol on the SERS substrate (ν, stretching; δ, bending; γ, out-of-plane deformation (respect to the benzene ring)).
Table 1. Experimental assignments of vibrations of 4-aminothiophenol on the SERS substrate (ν, stretching; δ, bending; γ, out-of-plane deformation (respect to the benzene ring)).
ModesSERS 532 nm (cm−1)Band Assignment
18a(a1)1007γCC + γCCC
7a(a1)1077νCS
9b(b2)1140δCH
9a(a1)1185δCH
14b(b2)1313νCC + δCH
3b(b2)1367νCC + δCH
19b(b2)1453νCC + δCH
8b(b2)1578νCC
-1650δCH
Table
Table 2. Raman intensities of the peak at 1185 cm−1.
Table 2. Raman intensities of the peak at 1185 cm−1.
Sputtering Time (min)Peak Intensity I (count)Increase Factor (IAu-Ag-M.w.-x/IAg-M.w.-x)
IAu-Ag-M.w.-xIAg-M.w.-x
10106,148 ± 1542.684,685 ± 748.81.25 ± 0.025
20263,045 ± 1146.4.3125,620 ± 1640.52.09 ± 0.032
30175,894 ± 1320.3105,630 ± 990.01.67 ± 0.017
40157,304 ± 1114.342,583 ± 909.73.69 ± 0.097

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, M.; Shi, G.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, P.; Jiao, T.; Li, R. Preparation of a Novel SERS Platform Based on Mantis Wing with High-Density and Multi-Level “Hot Spots”. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9050672

AMA Style

Wang M, Shi G, Zhu J, Zhu Y, Sun X, Wang P, Jiao T, Li R. Preparation of a Novel SERS Platform Based on Mantis Wing with High-Density and Multi-Level “Hot Spots”. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(5):672. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9050672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Mingli, Guochao Shi, Junlin Zhu, Yanying Zhu, Xin Sun, Peng Wang, Tifeng Jiao, and Ruifeng Li. 2019. "Preparation of a Novel SERS Platform Based on Mantis Wing with High-Density and Multi-Level “Hot Spots”" Nanomaterials 9, no. 5: 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9050672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop