Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Magnetic Nanoparticles via a Chemically Induced Transition: Role of Treating Solution’s Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
Sintering Inhibition of Silver Nanoparticle Films via AgCl Nanocrystal Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Response of Dermal Fibroblasts to Biochemical and Physical Cues in Aligned Polycaprolactone/Silk Fibroin Nanofiber Scaffolds for Application in Tendon Tissue Engineering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Broadband Ultra-Deep Sub-Diffraction-Limit Optical Focusing by Metallic Graded-Index (MGRIN) Lenses

1
Key Laboratory of Micro/Nano Systems for Aerospace, Ministry of Education, Xi’an 710072, China
2
Key Laboratory of Micro- and Nano-Electro-Mechanical Systems of Shaanxi Province, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2017, 7(8), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080221
Submission received: 20 July 2017 / Revised: 8 August 2017 / Accepted: 9 August 2017 / Published: 12 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multifunctional Metallic Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
The development of techniques for efficiently confining energy in the visible and infrared spectral regions to the deep subwavelength spatial scale with dimensions as small as a few nanometers would have great significance for scientific research and engineering practices. Such an ability to manipulate light is impossible for conventional dielectric lenses due to the diffraction limit. Here, we propose a metallic graded-index (MGRIN) lens formed by an array of coupled metallic waveguides with identical nanoscale widths embedded by index-varying dielectrics to enable the optical nanofocusing. The focusing mechanism of the MGRIN lens is theoretically investigated based on Hamiltonian optics, which are verified by the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. Numerical results reveal that an ultra-deep subwavelength focus of 8 nm (λ/500) with a long focal depth (1.93λ) and enhanced field intensity can be achieved. Moreover, the nanofocusing capability of the MGRIN lens without redesigning the structure can be well kept when the incident wavelength changes over a broad range from visible to infrared. Our design of optical nanofocusing shows great potential for use in nano-optics and nanotechnology.

1. Introduction

The spatial resolution of conventional optical devices is restricted by the diffraction to nearly half the operating wavelength, which greatly limits the performance of all the imaging and focusing systems that lie at the heart of modern biology, electronics, and optical integrated circuits [1,2,3]. In the past two decades, a great number of plasmonic devices have been designed to exceed the diffraction limit and manipulate the properties of light with nanometer-scale precision based on surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) [4,5,6,7]. In particular, many efforts have been made in nanofocusing of light using various metallic structures [8], such as plasmonic nanoantennas and tapered metallic structures.
Plasmonic nanoantennas function as optical resonators that can support highly localized plasmon modes, thus leading to the strong enhancement of the localized field near the antennas [9]. Unlike nanofocusing through localized surface plasmon resonance, plasmonic nanofocusing by tapered metallic structures involves an increasing concentration of light energy into a nanoscale spatial region as the SPP mode propagates along a tapered plasmonic waveguide with gradually varying parameters [8]. The metallic structures for such nanofocusing mainly include tapered metal rods with rounded tips [10,11,12,13,14,15], metal wedges surrounded by dielectrics [16,17,18], tapered metal strips on dielectric substrates [19,20,21], tapered gaps formed by metal-insulator-metal (MIM) structures [22,23,24,25,26], and metallic V-grooves [27]. These open great opportunities for the development of a new class of nano-optical devices and techniques, such as optical signal processing in highly integrated nanophotonic circuits [28], nano-optical sensors [29], nanoimaging [30], and nanomechanics [31].
Completely different from the two typical ways of optical nanofocusing mentioned above, in this work, we propose a unique method for nanofocusing using a planar metallic graded-index (MGRIN) lens that is composed of multilayer coupled MIM waveguides. Numerical simulation confirms our design and demonstrates that nanofocusing with a long focal depth and enhanced field intensity can be achieved with the MGRIN lens for broadband frequencies from visible to infrared. This planar structure can find applications in wavelength division multiplexing, nanolithography, and highly integrated optical circuits.

2. MGRIN Lens Design

Metallic waveguides have an extremely distinctive advantage over dielectric structures in their support for deep subwavelength modes [32], thus enabling the manipulation of light at the nanoscale. Additionally, metallic waveguide arrays have been extensively proposed for optical focusing [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Particularly, in 2009, Verslegers et al. [39] designed an aperiodic metallic waveguide array using Hamiltonian optics and demonstrated a deep-subwavelength focus of 30 nm, as small as λ/100 (λ being the operating wavelength), in the central waveguide. However, in their design, the waveguide widths must increase from the two sides to the center, which limits the further reduction of the central waveguide width and the resulting nanofocusing capability. In contrast, an array of coupled metallic waveguides of the constant width and gold spacing but filled with different dielectrics is employed to form our MGRIN lens for the nanofocusing scheme, as shown in Figure 1.
In our design, the structure is symmetric with respect to the central waveguide at y = 0 and semi-infinite in the z direction, which is normally illuminated by a transverse magnetic (TM) plane wave. Because the permittivities of the dielectrics do not vary much between one waveguide and its adjacent counterpart, this structure can be locally considered periodic. Therefore, the consequent dispersion equation for a waveguide can be derived using the transfer matrix method [40]:
cos   [ k y ( w + t ) ] = cos   ( k 1 w ) cos   ( k 2 t ) ε m 2 k 1 2 + ε d 2 k 2 2 2 ε m ε d k 1 k 2 sin   ( k 1 w ) sin ( k 2 t )
with k1 = (εdk02kx2)1/2 and k2 = (εmk02kx2)1/2, where w is the waveguide width, t is the metal spacing between two adjacent waveguides, k0 is the free space wave vector, and kx is the propagation wave vector in the x direction. εm and εd are the permittivities of the metal and dielectric material in the waveguide, respectively. Our nanofocusing structure is built based on the following propagation constant profile of the metallic waveguides along the y axis:
β s ( y ) = β s , 0 ( 1 + a y 2 )
where βs is the symmetric solution of kx in Equation (1) for ky = 0, and βs,0 is the corresponding value of the central waveguide. a is the gradient parameter. Since the effective refractive index of a waveguide is ne = βs/k0, Equation (2) can be transformed into the following:
n e ( y ) = n e , 0 ( 1 + a y 2 )
This quadratic effective index profile is similar to the design of a conventional graded-index lens [41], albeit the effective index increasing from the center to the side due to the negative refraction of a metallic waveguide array [42]. This is the reason why we consider this metallic waveguide array as an MGRIN lens.
On the other hand, by choosing a proper parameter b, we can obtain the following approximation:
β a ( y ) = β a , 0 ( 1 + b y 2 )
where βa is the antisymmetric solution of kx in Equation (1) for ky = π/(w + t), and βa,0 is the corresponding solution of the central waveguide. From Equations (2) and (4), the Hamiltonian can be deduced:
H ( y , k y ) = k x β s , 0 a β s , 0 y 2 + 1 4 ( β s , 0 β a , 0 ) ( w + t ) 2 k y 2
Furthermore, the trajectory of a light ray in the structure can be solved by:
d y d x = H ( y , k y ) k y , d k y d x = H ( y , k y ) y
From Equations (5) and (6), the analytical solution of a ray trajectory can be derived as follows:
y ( x ) = C 1 sin ( G x ) + C 2 cos ( G x )
with G = [(βa,0βs,0)s,0]1/2(w + t), C1 and C2 are constants related to the position and angle of the incident ray. Assuming that at x = 0, the position is y = y0 and the corresponding slope is y’ = y0’, the above equation can be transformed into:
y ( x ) = 1 G y 0 sin ( G x ) + y 0 cos ( G x )
In the case of normal incidence, since y0’ = 0, a ray trajectory can be further written as:
y ( x ) = y 0 cos ( G x )
From Equation (9), it can be concluded that for a normally incident plane wave, all rays go through a cosine trajectory and consequently intersect at a focal length of π/(2G) when they propagate in the structure of an MGRIN lens. This is the self-focusing mechanism of our MGRIN lens.

3. Results and Discussion

To demonstrate the focusing behavior, an MGRIN lens operating at a wavelength of 1 μm was designed with ε0 = 1 and εN = 1.69. At this wavelength, the permittivity of gold is εm = −40.764 + 1.261i [43]. We considered a structure with a total of 51 waveguides that have the same width of 10 nm and are uniformly separated by 30 nm of gold. The required permittivity of the dielectric in the nth waveguide (0 ≤ n ≤ 25) is calculated by using Equations (1) and (2), as shown in Figure 2. The maximum variation in the dielectric constant between the adjacent waveguides is less than 0.06. Thus, it is reasonable to consider the structure to be locally periodic.
By using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation, the focusing performance of the designed MGRIN lens is analyzed. In simulations, the grid size is set to 1 nm in both x and y directions to model the fine features of the electromagnetic field in the structure. Perfectly matched layers as the absorbing boundary conditions are applied around the computational domain. The incident TM-polarized plane wave is defined by setting the electric field component Ey with the amplitude of 1.
Figure 3a presents the simulated electric field intensity distribution of the structure, which clearly confirms the focusing behavior of the MGRIN lens. The realized full width at half maximum (FWHM) at the focus is 8 nm (λ/125), demonstrating the ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing. This is 12.5 times smaller than the FWHM of 100 nm achieved in the previous study, using a structure with varying waveguide widths [39] for the same operating wavelength. The focal depth (DOF) is 1.24 μm (Figure 3b), and more than one wavelength, which is difficult to implement by using the previous nanofocusing approaches. Furthermore, the simulated focal length is 6.44 μm, which is close to the theoretical result of 6.87 μm calculated by the Hamiltonian optics (i.e., π/(2G)). Meanwhile, compared with the incident plane wave, the field intensity at the focus is enhanced to 92.
In the previous research [39], the focusing structure needed to be redesigned when operating at a longer wavelength. In contrast, this is unnecessary for our design. We can use the same structure to obtain the nanofocusing effect for a wide range of wavelengths. Figure 4a–c show the simulated electric field intensity patterns for longer wavelengths of 2–4 μm (at 2 μm, εm = −183.23 + 7.522i; at 3 μm, εm = −415.98 + 22.462i; at 4 μm, εm = −747.36 + 51.625i) with the same structure as the one designed for the wavelength λ = 1 μm. These simulation results illustrate the similar focusing behavior. For the shorter wavelengths in the visible range down to 650 nm, focusing can also be realized, as shown in Figure 5. Nevertheless, for shorter wavelengths, the nanofocusing effect cannot be observed in the structure due to the losses near the cutoff frequencies for plasma oscillations [44]. Besides the operating wavelength, the propagation losses in the structure also depend on the spacing between metallic waveguides. Losses increase with the metallic spacing. However, the metallic spacing cannot be too small to provide the capability for subwavelength optical confinement. Therefore, the metallic spacing should be appropriately selected for the nanofocusing scheme.
Remarkably, the FWHMs of the foci considered are all 8 nm, far beyond the diffraction limit. For the operating wavelength of 4 μm, a focus as small as λ/500 can be obtained. In addition, when the incident wavelength varies from 0.65 μm to 4 μm, the focal length of the MGRIN lens increases from 2.88 μm to 28.98 μm accordingly (displayed in Figure 6a). Therefore, the focal length of an MGRIN lens can be modulated by controlling the working wavelength, apart from tuning the design parameters based on Equation (2). The focal depth also increases with the wavelength (depicted in Figure 6b), which is larger than one operating wavelength. Furthermore, the field intensity enhancement for all the foci is higher than 20, as shown in Figure 6c.
The physical mechanism behind the broadband focusing of an MGRIN lens is the small change in the effective index of a metallic waveguide. For instance, when the incident wavelength varies from 1 μm to 4 μm, the effective index of the waveguide at the side changes from 2.63 to 2.49. As for the central waveguide, the effective index change is much smaller, as shown in Figure 7. As a result, the effective indices of waveguides comprising the MGRIN lens are approximate, to meet Equation (3). This is the reason for the realization of nanofocusing with only one structure for a broad range of wavelengths.

4. Conclusions

In summary, based on Hamiltonian optics, a metallic graded-index (MGRIN) lens composed of an array of coupled metallic waveguides is proposed to focus light at the nanoscale. In contrast to the design of a conventional GRIN lens, the effective index for an MGRIN lens increases from the center to the side due to the negative refraction effect of coupled metallic waveguide arrays. The focusing behavior and performance of an MGRIN lens are investigated in detail via the 2D FDTD simulation method, including focal length, focal depth, and field intensity. Numerical results demonstrate that ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing (λ/500) with a highly enhanced field intensity and long focal depth can be achieved by an MGRIN lens. Moreover, this structure has the ability to focus over a broad range of wavelengths from visible to infrared. Such nanofocusing for broadband wavelengths could hardly be realized by previously reported methods. More importantly, the confinement capability of light based on our design can be further enhanced, provided that the metallic waveguide width can decrease further. The presented MGRIN lens shows great potential for applications in wavelength division multiplexing, nanolithography, and highly integrated optical circuits.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51375400, 51622509), the Specific Project for the National Excellent Doctorial Dissertations (201430), the 111 Project (Grant No. B13044), and the Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University (CX201606).

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbe, E. Resolution of microscopes. Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. 1873, 9, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.; Liu, Z. Superlenses to overcome the diffraction limit. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gramotnev, D.K.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Photon. 2010, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barnes, W.L.; Dereux, A.; Ebbesen, T.W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 2003, 424, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fang, N. Sub-Diffraction-Limited Optical Imaging with a Silver Superlens. Science 2005, 308, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schuller, J.A.; Barnard, E.S.; Cai, W.; Jun, Y.C.; White, J.S.; Brongersma, M.L. Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Han, Z.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Radiation guiding with surface plasmon polaritons. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2013, 76, 16402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gramotnev, D.K.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Nanofocusing of electromagnetic radiation. Nat. Photon. 2014, 8, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Novotny, L.; Hulst, N.V. Antennas for light. Nat. Photon. 2011, 5, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Babadjanyan, A.J.; Margaryan, N.L.; Nerkararyan, K.V. Superfocusing of surface polaritons in the conical structure. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 3785–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stockman, M.I. Nanofocusing of optical energy in tapered plasmonic waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 137404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Issa, N.A.; Guckenberger, R. Optical nanofocusing on tapered metallic waveguides. Plasmon. 2007, 2, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ropers, C.; Neacsu, C.C.; Elsaesser, T.; Albrecht, M.; Raschke, M.B.; Lienau, C. Grating-Coupling of Surface Plasmons onto Metallic Tips: A Nanoconfined Light Source. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 2784–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gramotnev, D.K.; Vogel, M.W. Ultimate capabilities of sharp metal tips for plasmon nanofocusing, near-field trapping and sensing. Phys. Lett. A 2011, 375, 3464–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kravtsov, V.; Ulbricht, R.; Atkin, J.M.; Raschke, M.B. Plasmonic nanofocused four-wave mixing for femtosecond near-field imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nerkararyan, K.V. Superfocusing of a surface polariton in a wedge-like structure. Phys. Rev. A 1997, 237, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Durach, M.; Rusina, A.; Stockman, M.I.; Nelson, K. Toward Full Spatiotemporal Control on the Nanoscale. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3145–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vernon, K.C.; Gramotnev, D.K.; Pile, D.F.P. Adiabatic nanofocusing of plasmons by a sharp metal wedge on a dielectric substrate. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 104312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Verhagen, E.; Polman, A.; Kuipers, L.K. Nanofocusing in laterally tapered plasmonic waveguides. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Verhagen, E.; Spasenović, M.; Polman, A.; Kuipers, L.K. Nanowire plasmon excitation by adiabatic mode transformation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 203904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Umakoshi, T.; Saito, Y.; Verma, P. Highly efficient plasmonic tip design for plasmon nanofocusing in near-field optical microscopy. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 5564–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pile, D.F.P.; Gramotnev, D.K. Adiabatic and nonadiabatic nanofocusing of plasmons by tapered gap plasmon waveguides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 41111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ginzburg, P.; Arbel, D.; Orenstein, M. Gap plasmon polariton structure for very efficient microscale-to-nanoscale interfacing. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 3288–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gramotnev, D.K.; Pile, D.F.; Vogel, M.W.; Zhang, X. Local electric field enhancement during nanofocusing of plasmons by a tapered gap. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 035431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vedantam, S.; Lee, H.; Tang, J.; Conway, J.; Staffaroni, M.; Yablonovitch, E. A Plasmonic Dimple Lens for Nanoscale Focusing of Light. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3447–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Choo, H.; Kim, M.; Staffaroni, M.; Seok, T.J.; Bokor, J.; Cabrini, S.; Schuck, P.J.; Wu, M.C.; Yablonovitch, E. Nanofocusing in a metal–insulator–metal gap plasmon waveguide with a three-dimensional linear taper. Nat. Photon. 2012, 6, 838–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Volkov, V.S.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I.; Rodrigo, S.G.; Martín-Moreno, L.; García-Vidal, F.J.; Devaux, E.; Ebbesen, T.W. Nanofocusing with Channel Plasmon Polaritons. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1278–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sorger, V.J.; Oulton, R.F.; Ma, R.M.; Zhang, X. Toward integrated plasmonic circuits. MRS Bull. 2012, 37, 728–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chung, T.; Lee, S.Y.; Song, E.Y.; Chun, H.; Lee, B. Plasmonic nanostructures for nano-scale bio-sensing. Sensors 2011, 11, 10907–10929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Frey, H.; Witt, S.; Felderer, K.; Guckenberger, R. High­resolution imaging of single fluorescent molecules with the optical near­field of a metal tip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 200801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Juan, M.L.; Righini, M.; Quidant, R. Plasmon nano-optical tweezers. Nat. Photon. 2011, 5, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Economou, E.N. Surface plasmons in thin films. Phys. Rev. 1969, 182, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, T.; Du, C.; Wang, C.; Luo, X. Subwavelength imaging by metallic slab lens with nanoslits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 201501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Verslegers, L.; Catrysse, P.B.; Yu, Z.; Fan, S. Planar metallic nanoscale slit lenses for angle compensation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 071112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Verslegers, L.; Catrysse, P.B.; Yu, Z.; White, J.S.; Barnard, E.S.; Brongersma, M.L.; Fan, S. Planar lenses based on nanoscale slit arrays in a metallic film. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, Q.; Cumming, D.R. Visible light focusing demonstrated by plasmonic lenses based on nano-slits in an aluminum film. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 14788–14793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhu, Y.; Yuan, W.; Yu, Y.; Diao, J. Metallic planar lens formed by coupled width-variable nanoslits for superfocusing. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 20124–20131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gordon, R. Proposal for superfocusing at visible wavelengths using radiationless interference of a plasmonic array. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 207402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Verslegers, L.; Catrysse, P.B.; Yu, Z.; Fan, S. Deep-subwavelength focusing and steering of light in an aperiodic metallic waveguide array. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 033902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yariv, A.; Yeh, O. Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications; Oxford Univercity Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  41. Reino, C.G.; Pérez, M.V.; Bao, C. Gradient-Index Optics: Fundamentals and Applicatioins; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fan, X.; Wang, G.P.; Lee, J.C.W.; Chan, C.T. All-angle broadband negative refraction of metal waveguide arrays in the visible range: theoretical analysis and numerical demonstration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 073901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Babar, S.; Weaver, J.H. Optical constants of Cu, Ag, and Au revisited. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ferrell, R.A. Characteristic energy loss of electrons passing through metal foils. ii. Dispersion relation and short wavelength cutoff for plasma oscillations. Phys. Rev. 1956, 107, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic of a metallic graded-index (MGRIN) lens formed by coupled waveguides of uniform width and gold spacing under the normal incidence of a transverse magnetic plane wave. The structure is symmetric with respect to the central waveguide at y = 0, and εn (0 ≤ n ≤ N) (n the integer with the values of 0, 1, 2… N) represents the permittivity of the dielectric in the waveguide n.
Figure 1. The schematic of a metallic graded-index (MGRIN) lens formed by coupled waveguides of uniform width and gold spacing under the normal incidence of a transverse magnetic plane wave. The structure is symmetric with respect to the central waveguide at y = 0, and εn (0 ≤ n ≤ N) (n the integer with the values of 0, 1, 2… N) represents the permittivity of the dielectric in the waveguide n.
Nanomaterials 07 00221 g001
Figure 2. The required permittivity of the dielectric in the nth waveguide of an MGRIN lens working at λ = 1 μm. The MGRIN lens comprises a total of 51 waveguides and the dielectric constant increases from 1 at the center to 1.69 at the sides.
Figure 2. The required permittivity of the dielectric in the nth waveguide of an MGRIN lens working at λ = 1 μm. The MGRIN lens comprises a total of 51 waveguides and the dielectric constant increases from 1 at the center to 1.69 at the sides.
Nanomaterials 07 00221 g002
Figure 3. Ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing of an MGRIN lens. (a) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity pattern. The inset shows the enlarged view for the electric intensity distribution of the focus; (b) The derived |E|2 on the optical axis. The FWHM and focal depth of the focus are 8 nm and 1.24 μm, respectively.
Figure 3. Ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing of an MGRIN lens. (a) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity pattern. The inset shows the enlarged view for the electric intensity distribution of the focus; (b) The derived |E|2 on the optical axis. The FWHM and focal depth of the focus are 8 nm and 1.24 μm, respectively.
Nanomaterials 07 00221 g003
Figure 4. Ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing of an MGRIN lens working at longer wavelengths. (ac) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity patterns for the wavelengths of 2–4 μm, respectively; (df) The corresponding |E|2 on the optical axis. The FWHMs of the three foci are all 8 nm. The focal depths at 2–4 μm are 3.18 μm, 5.24 μm, and 7.72 μm, respectively.
Figure 4. Ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing of an MGRIN lens working at longer wavelengths. (ac) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity patterns for the wavelengths of 2–4 μm, respectively; (df) The corresponding |E|2 on the optical axis. The FWHMs of the three foci are all 8 nm. The focal depths at 2–4 μm are 3.18 μm, 5.24 μm, and 7.72 μm, respectively.
Nanomaterials 07 00221 g004
Figure 5. Ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing of an MGRIN lens working at the shorter wavelengths. (ac) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity patterns for the wavelengths of 0.76 μm, 0.65 μm and 0.58 μm, respectively. The permittivity of gold at these three wavelengths is −20.273 + 0.703i, −12.266 + 0.779i, and −7.571 + 1.141i, respectively. The FWHMs of the two foci at 0.76 μm and 0.65 μm are both 8 nm. The corresponding focal depths are 0.86 μm and 0.88 μm, respectively.
Figure 5. Ultra-deep sub-diffraction-limit focusing of an MGRIN lens working at the shorter wavelengths. (ac) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity patterns for the wavelengths of 0.76 μm, 0.65 μm and 0.58 μm, respectively. The permittivity of gold at these three wavelengths is −20.273 + 0.703i, −12.266 + 0.779i, and −7.571 + 1.141i, respectively. The FWHMs of the two foci at 0.76 μm and 0.65 μm are both 8 nm. The corresponding focal depths are 0.86 μm and 0.88 μm, respectively.
Nanomaterials 07 00221 g005
Figure 6. The focusing performance of an MGRIN lens working at various wavelengths from 0.65 μm to 4 μm. (ac) Focal length, focal depth, and the maximum intensity at the focus varying as a function of the incident wavelength.
Figure 6. The focusing performance of an MGRIN lens working at various wavelengths from 0.65 μm to 4 μm. (ac) Focal length, focal depth, and the maximum intensity at the focus varying as a function of the incident wavelength.
Nanomaterials 07 00221 g006
Figure 7. Effective indices of the central waveguide filled with a dielectric of ε = 1 and the side waveguide filled with a dielectric of ε = 1.69 for various wavelengths.
Figure 7. Effective indices of the central waveguide filled with a dielectric of ε = 1 and the side waveguide filled with a dielectric of ε = 1.69 for various wavelengths.
Nanomaterials 07 00221 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, Y.; Yuan, W.; Sun, H.; Yu, Y. Broadband Ultra-Deep Sub-Diffraction-Limit Optical Focusing by Metallic Graded-Index (MGRIN) Lenses. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080221

AMA Style

Zhu Y, Yuan W, Sun H, Yu Y. Broadband Ultra-Deep Sub-Diffraction-Limit Optical Focusing by Metallic Graded-Index (MGRIN) Lenses. Nanomaterials. 2017; 7(8):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Yechuan, Weizheng Yuan, Hao Sun, and Yiting Yu. 2017. "Broadband Ultra-Deep Sub-Diffraction-Limit Optical Focusing by Metallic Graded-Index (MGRIN) Lenses" Nanomaterials 7, no. 8: 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop