Next Article in Journal
Interface Design in Bimetallic PdNi Nanowires for Boosting Alcohol Oxidation Performances
Previous Article in Journal
Advancements in Titanium Dioxide Nanotube-Based Sensors for Medical Diagnostics: A Two-Decade Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanosized Anisotropic Sm–Fe–N Particles with Metastable TbCu7-Type Structures Prepared by an Induction Thermal Plasma Process

1
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 4-205, Sakurazaka, Moriyama, Nagoya 463-8560, Japan
2
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6-01, Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(13), 1045; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15131045
Submission received: 28 April 2025 / Revised: 24 June 2025 / Accepted: 3 July 2025 / Published: 5 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Plasma-Induced Synthesis of Nanomaterials)

Abstract

TbCu7-type Sm-based compounds can be produced in bulk and potentially surpass Nd2Fe14B as permanent magnets. However, as the processes to prepare anisotropic magnetic particles are limited, the full potential of TbCu7-type Sm-based compounds cannot be exploited. In this study, metastable TbCu7-type phases of anisotropic Sm–Fe–N ultrafine particles were prepared using the low-oxygen induction thermal plasma (LO-ITP) process. X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the obtained TbCu7-type Sm–Fe alloy nanoparticles exhibited a c/a value of 0.8419, with an Fe/Sm atomic ratio of ~8.5. After nitrogenation, the obtained Sm–Fe–N nanoparticles were aligned under an external magnetic field, indicating that each alloy particle exhibited anisotropic magnetic properties. A substantially high degree of alignment of 91 ± 2% was achieved, quantitatively estimated via pole figure measurements. Numerical analysis following Sm–Fe nanoparticle formation showed that, compared with Fe condensation, Sm condensation persisted even at low temperatures, because of a significant difference in vapor pressure between Sm and Fe. Though this led to a relatively large compositional distribution of Sm within particles with a Sm concentration of 9–12 at%, the preparation of single-phase TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N particles could be facilitated by optimizing several parameters during the LO-ITP process.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

For the purpose of achieving carbon neutrality, the development of electric vehicles and aircraft is attracting considerable attention. High-output, high-efficiency motors are essential for realizing such types of electrification, necessitating the development of permanent magnets that can withstand high temperatures. Currently, high-efficiency interior permanent magnet motors use neodymium magnets composed mainly of Nd2Fe14B [1,2]. However, neodymium magnets are limited by their relatively low heat resistance. For instance, at approximately 150 °C, which is the operating temperature of electric vehicle motors, the performance of a permanent magnet deteriorates significantly. Therefore, by introducing numerous heavy rare-earth elements such as Dy and Tb to improve magnetic anisotropy [3,4], the required coercivity of 0.8 MA/m at approximately 150 °C can be achieved [5]. However, the use of these heavy rare-earth elements must be reduced or eliminated owing to resource concerns and decreased magnetization. Recently, several studies have reported that coercivity can be improved at high temperatures without the use of heavy rare-earth elements via alloy improvement [6] and process development [7,8], based on various advanced microstructural analyses [9].
The fabrication of high-performance permanent magnets capable of withstanding high temperatures is key to developing next-generation motors. Reported Sm–Fe-based compounds [10,11,12,13,14] exhibit a high Curie temperature of over 450 °C, and their anisotropic magnetic field and saturation magnetization are higher or comparable to those of Nd2Fe14B [1]. Sm–Fe-based compounds with intrinsic properties superior to those of Nd2Fe14B can be classified into two types based on their crystal structures: TbCu7 and ThMn12.
Compounds featuring the ThMn12 structure, such as Sm(FeCo)12 [15] and (SmZr)(FeCo)12 [16], are among the most promising permanent magnet materials reported to date, and their saturation magnetization at 300 K exceeds 1.7 T. However, because compounds with a ThMn12 structure and an Fe-rich composition that contain more Fe than the stable phase Sm2Fe17 are extremely unstable, reports of their bulk synthesis are lacking. For the bulk production of magnets with a ThMn12 structure, Fe should be substituted with a nonmagnetic structure-stabilizing element such as Ti, V, or Mo. However, when Fe is substituted, saturation magnetization is significantly reduced [17,18,19]. Recently, various studies have experimentally [14,20,21,22] and computationally [23,24,25,26] explored structurally stabilizing elements and their compositions while maintaining an Fe-rich Sm–Fe based composition.
Another Fe-rich Sm–Fe–N with a metastable phase and TbCu7-type structure possesses some of the best intrinsic properties among currently available bulk magnet powders, something which has recently been confirmed by epitaxial thin film experiments [27]. However, owing to the presence of the metastable phase, production remains possible only through the melt-spinning [12,13,28,29] and hydrogenation–decomposition–desorption–recombination processes [30,31,32,33]. Because only polycrystalline materials without a crystal orientation can be obtained using these processes, the intrinsic characteristics of the compound cannot be effectively utilized. Recently, Okada et al. reported a single-crystal, nanosized powder with a TbCu7-type phase prepared via low-temperature reduction diffusion [34,35]. While previous studies effectively promoted the reduction reaction only above the melting point of the Ca serving as a reducing agent [36], the authors realized the reduction reaction at a temperature lower than the melting point of Ca using molten salt, enabling the preparation of a single-crystalline powder with a metastable phase.
In this study, we focused on an induction thermal plasma (ITP) process as a breakthrough process for obtaining anisotropic nanosized powders of TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N compounds. The thermal plasma processes are physical bottom-up processes characterized by quenching rates higher than that of the liquid-quenching method [37,38,39,40,41]. Thermal plasma is produced by an electric discharge at approximately 100 kPa; therein, atoms, ions, and electrons collide frequently. As a result, thermal plasma has high enthalpy and high flow speed [42,43,44]. By virtue of these features, material vapors can be transported and converted into nanosized powders rapidly in the flow field [45,46,47,48,49,50]. Although jet-type and arc-type thermal plasmas inherently include contamination from the electrodes, ITP is clean of contamination because the plasma is generated and sustained by electromagnetic induction without electrodes. Furthermore, the ITP has a region with a larger volume of high temperature, approximately 10,000 K, which achieves rapid evaporation of a large amount of raw precursor materials [51,52] and consequent high yields of powders [53,54,55,56,57]. Studies have demonstrated that a TbCu7-type compound can be obtained using the ITP process from the Nd–Fe [58] systems. These results indicate a high possibility of obtaining a TbCu7-type compound from the Sm–Fe system. Moreover, when the ITP process is applied, a fine permanent magnet anisotropic powder with a size of approximately 100 nm can be synthesized, which cannot easily be obtained using conventional breakdown processes such as jet-milling. This suggests that an anisotropic magnet with a large coercive force can be obtained. Therefore, in this study, we prepared a nanosized TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N powder using the ITP process and evaluated its phase and magnetic properties.
This study is structured as follows: Section 2 describes the methods used for the preparation and characterization of the developed materials, as well as the numerical calculation methods. Section 3 presents the results and discussion based on the experimental and numerical results. Finally, Section 4 summarizes the paper’s references.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of the Raw Powder for ITP Process

Because metallic Sm powder is not commercially available for use as a starting material, we prepared micron-sized Sm powder using a skull gas-atomizing device with a water-cooled copper crucible (CCGA-0.8, SINFONIA TECHNOLOGY Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). To prevent the oxidation of the obtained Sm powder, it was handled without exposure to air. Figure 1a shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Sm powders obtained (i) with and (ii) without exposure to air. No oxide peak was observed for the powder without exposure to air, whereas nitride and/or oxide peaks were detected for the powder exposed to air. Figure 1b shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the Sm powder obtained by gas atomization. A highly spherical powder was obtained, which is a characteristic of the powder morphology obtained during gas atomization. In this experiment, nonexposed Sm powder was used as the starting material, and its particle size histogram is shown in Figure 1c. A mixture of Sm powder (D90 = 21.3 μm) and Fe powder (D90 = 6.7 μm, High Purity Chemical Laboratory, Saitama, Japan) with an atomic ratio of Sm:Fe = 1:x (x = 1.5 and 6.0) was used as the starting powder for the ITP process. Because the particle size of the Sm powder was relatively large for complete evaporation during the thermal plasma process, the starting ratio x was set larger than the target value of x = 9. The ITP process was performed at a process pressure of 100 kPa and an input power of 6 kW.

2.2. Characterization

The particle sizes of the coarse powders were measured using laser diffraction equipment (HELOS, Sympatec GmbH, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany). The particle size of the ITP-processed nanopowder was estimated from the SEM image captured using JSM-7800S (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) by fitting it to a log-normal distribution function. The nanopowder obtained using the ITP process was sealed in a quartz capillary with a diameter of 300 μm in a glovebox, and its crystal structure was evaluated by powder transmission XRD obtained at the BL5S2 beamline in Aichi Synchrotron Radiation Center (Aichi, Japan) at 14 keV without oxidizing the powder. In addition, a microstructural analysis was conducted using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM; JEOL Ltd., JEM-ARM200CF equipped with a CEOS ASCOR corrector) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The powder was dispersed in an acetonitrile solution using a homogenizer and was then magnetically separated and oriented at 7 MA/m and 300 K in a resin. To obtain accurate information on its magnetic phase, magnetic separation was performed before magnetic field orientation to eliminate nonmagnetic compounds. The aligned sample was evaluated by a θ–2θ and a pole figure measurement at the Aichi BL8S1 beamline at 14.37 keV.

2.3. Numerical Calculation

To quantitatively evaluate the vapor-to-particle conversion and alloying processes, a numerical calculation was performed using the binary aerosol growth model with the nodal discretization technique [59]. The particles grew collectively, and their size and composition changed in a time-dependent manner. This process involves simultaneous homogeneous nucleation (metal vapor atoms form embryos of particles), heterogeneous condensation (metal vapor atoms meet and merge with embryos and particles), and interparticle coagulation (particles collide and unite) under the following assumptions:
The particles are spherical.
Bulk gas, metal vapors, and particles have the same temperature.
Heat generation due to vapor condensation on particles is negligible.
Metal vapor is considered an ideal gas owing to its high temperature.
The melting point of particles depends on their size and composition [60,61] and is assumed to be uniform within the particle.
The electric charge of particles is negligible under the present conditions.
It is noteworthy that charging effects can be considerable when many electrons exist in the region in which particles are generated and grow. For instance, electrons still remain even outside of plasma when the bulk gas and plasma contain species with low electron-recombination rates or when the spatial temperature gradient is very steep at the fringe of the plasma such as arc plasma [62]. The present process uses argon gas with a high electron-recombination rate and an ITP with relatively gentle temperature gradient, in which charging effects can be neglected.
The numerical calculation was performed under typical cooling conditions at the plasma tail, where the temperature monotonically decreased at a rate of 5.0 × 104 K/s, which was determined to match the average particle size obtained from the experiment, as shown in Figure 2b. Under conditions identical to those in the experiment, the total feed rate of the precursory mixed powder with Sm:Fe = 1:9 (at %) was set to 0.25 g/min in the carrier Ar gas at 3.0 L/min. Detailed descriptions of the calculation conditions are provided in previous reports [58].

3. Results and Discussion

As estimated from the histograms obtained from the SEM images in Figure 2a,b, the ITP process produced nanopowders with mean particle sizes of 45 ± 17 and 62 ± 34 nm for x = 1.5 and 6.0, respectively. The mean particle size and standard deviation σ are determined from the histograms by fitting them to the log-normal distribution function. SmFe2 and Sm–Fe with TbCu7-type structures were observed in the samples with x = 1.5 and 6.0, respectively. After annealing at 600 °C, only Sm–Fe with the TbCu7-type structure was obtained for x = 6.0, while the x = 1.5 powder contained a sufficient amount of Sm to form Sm-rich compounds such as SmFe2 and SmFe3, as shown in Figure 2c. During the alloy formation in the ITP process, Sm condensation may be delayed compared with Fe condensation because of the significant difference in the vapor pressures and surface tensions of Sm and Fe (this formation process is discussed subsequently in the calculation). Therefore, atomic diffusion proceeded and resulted in the formation of alloy phases during heat treatment. This diffusion was also reported in the investigation of the obtained phases of the Sm–Fe system during low-temperature heat treatment [34].
When the lattice constant was estimated from the position of the XRD peak for the sample with x = 6.0 powder, a = 0.4935 nm and c = 0.4155 nm (c/a = 0.8419) were calculated for the sample before nitridation. Based on the lattice constant, the composition ratio (at %) of Sm and Fe in the TbCu7-type Sm–Fe compound prepared in this study is approximately 8.5 [12]. After nitriding by heat treatment at an elevated temperature of 400 °C in an N2 flow for 15 min, N was introduced into the Sm–Fe lattice with a TbCu7-type structure, as confirmed by lattice expansion. The introduction of N causes a lattice expansion of approximately 6.82% (a = 0.5057 nm, c = 0.4227 nm, c/a = 0.8359), indicating sufficient nitriding.
Figure 3 shows the results of the microstructural analysis after nitriding with x = 6 Fe-rich compositions. The results of energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) show that Sm is highly concentrated on the particle surface and has a core–shell structure as shown in Figure 3a. In addition, sufficient N was present in the alloy, which was consistent with the XRD results. High-resolution STEM and fast Fourier transform (FFT) images for particle #1 are shown in Figure 3b. By tilting particle #1 around the [100] direction, two consecutive atomic images with zone axes of <012> and <011> were obtained, as shown in Figure 3b, indicating that the particle has a TbCu7-type crystal structure. Moreover, the particle is a single crystal. Thus, TbCu7-type single-crystal nanoparticles could be synthesized using the ITP process starting from the Sm–Fe and Nd–Fe systems [58]. However, particle #2 had a partially ordered Th2Zn17 structure, as shown in Figure 3c. Although this partially ordered Th2Zn17 structure is not as random as the TbCu7-type phase, two phases with a plane symmetry in the yz plane of the Th2Zn17 phase were included. This crystal ordering fluctuation did not affect the magnetization because the c-axes of both TbCu7 and Th2Zn17 were the axes of easy magnetization. TbCu7 and Th2Zn17 cannot easily be distinguished from the microstructural observations of a single ZA. Therefore, as shown in Figure 3b, observation was performed from an appropriate ZA direction that can separate the disordered and ordered phases.
To prove that the TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N nanoparticles were anisotropic, the powders were magnetically aligned at 9 T and 300 K in a resin, after which the aligned powers were examined using XRD at the aforementioned BL8S1 beamline at an X-ray energy of 14.37 keV (wavelength of 0.0863 nm). Figure 4a shows the θ–2θ patterns of the aligned powders, along with those of the nonaligned powders (“iso”) for reference. When the normal vector of the measurement surface is parallel to the direction of magnetic alignment, the dataset is denoted as “out of plane” (OOP), and other datasets in which the normal vector is perpendicular to the direction of magnetic alignment are denoted as “in plane” (IP). The intensity from the (0 0 l) plane was high in the OOP configuration, whereas the intensity from the (h k 0) plane was high in the IP configuration, indicating that the obtained nanoparticles were anisotropic and that the easy axis of the TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N was the c-axis.
To quantify the degree of alignment of TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N, pole figure measurements were conducted. The 2θ was fixed at a peak position of the (002) plane for the TbCu7-type structure, and the pole figure around the [001] direction was obtained by changing b and c at intervals of 3°, where β and χ are the angles, as shown in Figure 4a. The contour map of I(β, χ) is shown in Figure 4bc. High intensity was observed in the [001] direction (β = χ = 0). Figure 4c shows the intensity as a function of χ using Equation (1).
I χ = 0 2 π I χ , β d β ,
Based on I(χ), the degree of alignment P was calculated using Equation (2).
P % = 2 × 0 π / 2 I χ s i n χ c o s χ d χ 0 π / 2 I χ s i n χ d χ 1 × 100 ,
where 0 π / 2 I χ s i n χ d χ and 0 π / 2 I χ s i n χ c o s χ d χ denote the total magnetic moment and the projection of the components of the total magnetic moment in the Z-direction along the external magnetic field, respectively [63]. Therefore, a p value of 91 ± 2% was estimated, indicating that the alloy nanoparticles with the TbCu7 structure had an extremely high orientation along the c-axis. To the best of our knowledge, a high degree of alignment for Sm–Fe–N with the TbCu7-type structure is experimentally demonstrated in this study for the first time.
Figure 5 shows the measurement results at 300 and 10 K for the magnetic-field-oriented sample. The configurations in which the magnetic direction during the measurement is parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic alignment are described as “easy” and “hard”, respectively. The vertical axis was normalized by the magnetization obtained by the measurement in the easy axial direction at 9 T and 10 K. The difference between the hysteresis loops measured in the easy and hard directions can be observed at a low temperature of 10 K, where the anisotropic magnetic field increases. Therefore, the anisotropy field might be over 9 T at even 300 K. However, because this sample contained a considerable amount of Fe, the hysteresis curve differed from that of a compound with typical uniaxial anisotropy. Therefore, the magnetic anisotropy field cannot easily be determined accurately. Coercivity is extremely small, being 0.056 MA/m at room temperature and 0.08 MA/m at 10 K, while coercivity can increase when the amount of Fe existing in the core is reduced by controlling the cooling rate in the ITP process and/or post annealing. When the radius of the Fe core is small compared with the exchange coupling length of the Sm–Fe–N shell, a certain degree of coercivity can be maintained, but when the radius of the Fe core is long compared with the exchange coupling length of the Sm–Fe–N, the soft magnetic component of Fe has a large effect and the coercivity drops dramatically.
Figure 6 shows the results obtained from the numerical calculation of the vapor-to-particle conversion of the Sm–Fe particles. In Figure 6a,b, the condensation of both Fe and Sm starts simultaneously immediately after Fe nucleation occurs at approximately 1650 K. The maximum consumption rate of Fe is approximately 102 times higher than that of Sm. This difference indicates that almost all of the Fe vapor is consumed at 1600 K, whereas only approximately 10% of the Sm vapor is consumed, as shown in Figure 6c. Thereafter, Sm vapor condensation continues up to 1100 K. From approximately 1500 K, the ratio of Sm vapor condensation to solid particles starts to increase, and, finally, approximately 80% of the Sm vapor condenses to solid particles. In this calculation model, Sm and Fe atoms mix uniformly in a particle, even if they condense into liquid and/or solid particles. The diffusion rates of Sm and Fe atoms in a particle are not considered. The particles obtained in the experiment were observed after a certain degree of alloying due to atomic diffusion. Notably, EDX images confirm the formation of Sm–Fe alloy particles with Sm-rich shells. Because Fe has similar intrinsic properties (vapor pressure and surface tension) to those of Co, the results obtained in this study show the same trends as those shown for the Sm–Co system [64]. Specifically, the nucleation temperature of Fe in the SmFe7 system is slightly lower than that of Co in the SmCo5 system, even with the same cooling rate of 5.0 × 104 K/s, because of the Fe-rich composition.
The present Sm–Fe system produces particles with a significant compositional distribution because the metal species pairs have significantly different saturation vapor pressures, as reported in the literature [65]. Figure 7 shows the final size and composition distributions of the particles at 300 K. This result indicates that the Sm concentration was within the range of 9–12 at%. Metastable TbCu7-type Sm–Fe can be synthesized within a range for Sm of up to 9.1(SmFe10)–12.5(SmFe7) at% [12,13]. Therefore, by sufficiently optimizing the process conditions, the ITP process can effectively obtain a single-phase TbCu7-type Sm–Fe alloy nanopowder. As a compound with high saturation magnetization has an Fe-rich concentration, a composition containing as much Fe as possible, such as an atomic ratio of Sm/Fe = 10, is necessary. An effective method for producing Fe-rich compounds is to substitute Zr or Y with Sm, which increases the c/a ratio and allows dumbbell Fe to be stably introduced into the lattice [13]. Therefore, In the future, we will attempt to enrich Fe by adding Zr and Y.
This study attempted to answer the question, “What type of particle formation process can be used to produce particles with a uniform composition?” This numerical calculation assumed a uniform composition inside each nanoparticle, which could differ from actual Sm–Fe nanoparticles. As aforementioned, in the case of Sm–Fe, approximately 10% of the particles pass through the liquid phase. Because the diffusion rate in the liquid phase is much higher than that in the solid phase, the advantage of passing through the liquid phase is significant for homogenizing the intraparticle composition. However, in Sm–Fe nanoparticles obtained by the solid-phase diffusion of Sm, if the diffusion length within a finite time is shorter than the particle size, core–shell particles with a Sm-rich phase are formed as the shell is formed. Therefore, to obtain a single-phase powder when the condensation temperatures are different, such as for Sm–Fe, the following conditions are necessary: (1) The time (temperature range) at which the droplets remained was expanded. However, the grain growth becomes significant as the cooling rate decreases [66]. (2) The solid-state diffusion time was prolonged. In the present Sm–Fe system, the residence time of many particles should be increased in the temperature range of 1100–900 K. However, conditions with a low cooling rate should be set during the ITP process. The realization of these conditions requires the control of heat flow at appropriate temperatures, and the results of numerical calculations significantly contribute to this realization.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a novel anisotropic Sm–Fe–N nanopowder with a TbCu7-type structure was prepared using the ITP process. The alloy phases of SmFe2 and TbCu7-type Sm–Fe compounds were obtained in the thermal plasma-processed state. In addition, Fe-core/Sm and/or Fe-core/SmFe-shell particles were observed using TEM. After nitriding, the TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N and Fe phases were detected by XRD. Following magnetic alignment, the TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N particles were well aligned along the c-axis, indicating that the TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N compound exhibited uniaxial magnetic anisotropy. This anisotropy was confirmed by magnetic measurements. Although the magnetic properties of this material as a permanent magnet are still low because of the high Fe content, we synthesized a TbCu7-type Sm–Fe–N anisotropic powder with a particle size of less than 100 nm using a thermal plasma process. The atomic ratio of Fe/Sm was 8.5, indicating that an Fe-rich compound was not synthesized. In the future, we will attempt to enrich Fe by adding Zr and Y. The calculation results show that the vapor consumption of both Sm and Fe is a result of condensation, and that the condensation of Sm occurs at a significantly lower temperature than that of Fe. This is because of the difference in their saturation vapor pressures. Because the condensation of Sm occurs at low temperatures, approximately 90% of Sm merges with solid particles rather than with liquid droplets. This result is consistent with the TEM results, in which several particles with Sm-rich shells are observed. Therefore, to obtain Sm–Fe particles with a uniform composition within the particles, the temperature and time for diffusion should be determined, which is a guideline for future process improvements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H.; data curation, Y.H.; formal analysis, Y.H. and M.S. (Masaya Shigeta); funding acquisition, K.O.; investigation, Y.H., J.W., M.S. (Masaya Shigeta), S.T., M.S. (Makoto Sugimoto) and Z.L.; project administration, K.O.; software, M.S. (Masaya Shigeta), S.T. and M.S. (Makoto Sugimoto); supervision, Y.H.; validation, Y.H., M.S. (Masaya Shigeta), S.T. and M.S. (Makoto Sugimoto); visualization, J.W. and Z.L.; writing—original draft, Y.H. and M.S. (Masaya Shigeta); writing—review and editing, Y.H., J.W., S.T., M.S. (Makoto Sugimoto), K.T. and K.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the JPNP20019 project commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). The calculation part of this work was partly supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (KAKENHI Grant No. 21H01249).

Data Availability Statement

Relevant data in this paper are available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The X-ray diffraction experiments were conducted at the BL5S2 (Proposal No. 202005066) and BL8S1 beamlines (Proposal No. 202005066) of the Aichi Synchrotron Radiation Center, Aichi Science & Technology Foundation, Aichi, Japan. The authors wish to thank Kazumi Hayakawa for technical assistance with TEM microsample preparation using a focused ion beam.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Sagawa, M.; Fujimura, S.; Togawa, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Matsuura, Y. New material for permanent magnets on a base of Nd and Fe (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 55, 2083–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Croat, J.J. Permanent-Magnet Properties of Rapidly Quenched Rare Earth-Iron Alloys. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1982, 18, 1442–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Löewe, K.; Brombacher, C.; Katter, M.; Gutfleisch, O. Temperature-dependent Dy diffusion processes in Nd–Fe–B permanent magnets. Acta Mater. 2015, 83, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, T.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Pan, W.; Huang, Q.; Liu, R.; Li, M.; Xie, G. Super-high coercivity NdFeB magnet fabricated with double Tb-rich/lean shells by double alloy method and grain boundary diffusion. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 937, 168368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, L.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Ohkubo, T.; Yano, M.; Kato, A.; Sakuma, N.; Shoji, T.; Hono, K. Coercivity enhancement of hot-deformed Nd-Fe-B magnets by the eutectic grain boundary diffusion process using Nd62Dy20Al18 alloy. Scr. Mater. 2017, 129, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, X.D.; Sasaki, T.T.; Li, J.N.; Dong, Z.J.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Kim, T.H.; Ohkubo, T.; Schrefl, T.; Hono, K. Microstructure of a Dy-free Nd-Fe-B sintered magnet with 2 T coercivity. Acta Mater. 2018, 156, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hioki, K. High performance hot-deformed Nd-Fe-B magnets (Review). Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2021, 22, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akiya, T.; Liu, J.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Ohkubo, T.; Hioki, K.; Hattori, A.; Hono, K. High-coercivity hot-deformed Nd-Fe-B permanent magnets processed by Nd-Cu eutectic diffusion under expansion constraint. Scr. Mater. 2014, 81, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, S.; Sato, A.; Tamaoka, T.; Yubuta, K.; Auchi, M.; Sasaki, T.; Ohkubo, T.; Hono, K.; Murakami, Y. Extraction of phase information approximating the demagnetization field within a thin-foiled magnet using electron holography observation. Microscopy 2022, 72, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Coey, J.M.D.; Lawler, J.F.; Sun, H.; Allan, J.E.M. Nitrogenation of R2Fe17 compounds: R=rare earth. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 69, 3007–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iriyama, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Imaoka, N.; Fukuda, T.; Kato, H.; Nakagawa, Y. Effect of nitrogen content on magnetic properties of Sm2Fe17Nx(0<x<6). Magn. IEEE Trans. 1992, 28, 2326–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Katter, M.; Wecker, J.; Schultz, L. Structural and hard magnetic properties of rapidly solidified Sm–Fe–N. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 3188–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sakurada, S.; Tsutai, A.; Hirai, T.; Yanagida, Y.; Sahashi, M.; Abe, S.; Kaneko, T. Structural and magnetic properties of rapidly quenched (R,Zr)(Fe,Co)10Nx (R=Nd,Sm). J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 4611–4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hagiwara, M.; Sanada, N.; Sakurada, S. Effect of Y substitution on the structural and magnetic properties of Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)11.4Ti0.6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 465, 554–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hirayama, Y.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Hirosawa, S.; Hono, K. Intrinsic hard magnetic properties of Sm(Fe1−xCox)12 compound with the ThMn12 structure. Scr. Mater. 2017, 138, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tozman, P.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Ogawa, D.; Hirosawa, S.; Hono, K. The effect of Zr substitution on saturation magnetization in (Sm1-xZrx)(Fe0.8Co0.2)12 compound with the ThMn12 structure. Acta Mater. 2019, 178, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ohashi, K.; Tawara, Y.; Osugi, R.; Shimao, M. Magnetic properties of Fe-rich rare-earth intermetallic compounds with a ThMn12 structure. J. Appl. Phys. 1988, 64, 5714–5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Verhoef, R.; de Boer, F.R.; Zhi-dong, Z.; Buschow, K.H.J. Moment reduction in RFe12-xTx compounds (R=Gd, Y and T=Ti, Cr, V, Mo, W). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1988, 75, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miyake, T.; Terakura, K.; Harashima, Y.; Kino, H.; Ishibashi, S. First-Principles Study of Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy and Magnetization in NdFe12, NdFe11Ti, and NdFe11TiN. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2014, 83, 043702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tozman, P.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Tang, X.; Ohkubo, T.; Hono, K. Development of Co-lean (Sm,Y)(Fe,Co,Ti)12 compounds with large saturation magnetization. Appl. Phys. Express 2022, 15, 045505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tozman, P.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Ohkubo, T.; Hono, K. Intrinsic magnetic properties of (Sm,Gd)Fe12-based compounds with minimized addition of Ti. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 855, 157491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tozman, P.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Hirosawa, S.; Hono, K. Intrinsic magnetic properties of Sm(Fe1-xCox)11Ti and Zr-substituted Sm1-yZry(Fe0.8Co0.2)11.5Ti0.5 compounds with ThMn12 structure toward the development of permanent magnets. Acta Mater. 2018, 153, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Körner, W.; Krugel, G.; Urban, D.F.; Elsässer, C. Screening of rare-earth-lean intermetallic 1-11 and 1-11-X compounds of YNi9In2-type for hard-magnetic applications. Scr. Mater. 2018, 154, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fukazawa, T.; Akai, H.; Harashima, Y.; Miyake, T. First-principles study of spin-wave dispersion in Sm(Fe1−xCox)12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 469, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Harashima, Y.; Fukazawa, T.; Kino, H.; Miyake, T. Effect of R-site substitution and the pressure on stability of RFe12: A first-principles study. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 163902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Skelland, C.; Ostler, T.; Westmoreland, S.C.; Evans, R.F.L.; Chantrell, R.W.; Yano, M.; Shoji, T.; Manabe, A.; Kato, A.; Ito, M.; et al. Probability Distribution of Substituted Titanium in RT (R. = Nd and Sm; T = Fe and Co) Structures. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2018, 54, 2103405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dilipan, A.R.; Ogawa, D.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Tozman, P.; Hiroto, T.; Hono, K.; Takahashi, Y.K. Excellent intrinsic magnetic properties in the TbCu7-type Sm-Fe-N compound. Acta Mater. 2024, 274, 119996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kurokawa, N.; Matsuura, M.; Sakurada, S.; Sugimoto, S. Enhancement of magnetic properties and microstructural changes in TbCu7-type Sm-Fe-Co-Nb-B melt-spun ribbons. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2022, 556, 169414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kurokawa, N.; Matsuura, M.; Sakurada, S.; Sugimoto, S. Effects of Nb and B addition on intrinsic magnetic properties and phase of TbCu7-type Sm-Fe-Co-Nb-B alloys. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Magnetic Conference-Short Papers (INTERMAG Short Papers), Aobayama, Japan, 15–19 May 2023; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  30. Christodoulou, C.N.; Takeshita, T. Sm2Fe17-nitride-based permanent magnets produced by the hydrogenation-decomposition-desorption-recombination (HDDR) process. J. Alloys Compd. 1993, 196, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, X.-g.; Zhang, Z.-d.; Liu, W.; Xiao, Q.-f.; Sun, X.K. Structural and magnetic properties of Sm–Fe–N magnets prepared by hydrogenation and nitrogenation processes. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1995, 148, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Müller, K.H.; Cao, L.; Dempsey, N.M.; Wendhausen, P.A.P. Sm2Fe17 interstitial magnets (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 5045–5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, J.-B.; Cui, C.-X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, L.; Yang, W.; Liu, Y.-L. Structural and nitrogenation of Sm2Fe16Ti1 alloy prepared by HDDR process. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2006, 97, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Okada, S.; Takagi, K. Novel synthesis of single-crystalline TbCu7-type Sm–Fe powder by low-temperature reduction-diffusion process using molten salt. J. Rare Earths 2022, 40, 1126–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sato, S.; Nishikawa, K.; Node, E.; Okada, S. Development of TbCu7-type Sm-Fe-N anisotropic magnet powder and its sintered magnets. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 929, 167280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tada, S.; Tomimoto, T.; Kume, M. High-Coercivity Anisotoropic SmFeN Magnetic Materials. In Proceedings of the REPM’12 22th International Workshop on Rare-Earth Permanent Magnets and Their Applications, Nagasaki, Japan, 2–5 September 2012; pp. 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bilodeau, J.-F.; Proulx, P. A Mathematical Model for Ultrafine Iron Powder Growth in a Thermal Plasma. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1996, 24, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Désilets, M.; Bilodeau, J.F.; Proulx, P. Modelling of the reactive synthesis of ultra-fine powders in a thermal plasma reactor. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1997, 30, 1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Watanabe, T.; Tonoike, N.; Honda, T.; Kanzawa, A. Flow, Temperature and Concentration Fields in Reactive Plasmas in an Inductively Coupled RF Discharge&mdash;Characteristics in Argon-Oxygen and Argon-Nitrogen Thermal Plasmas&mdash. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1991, 24, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Watanabe, T.; Okumiya, H. Formation mechanism of silicide nanoparticles by induction thermal plasmas. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2004, 5, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shigeta, M.; Watanabe, T. Numerical investigation of cooling effect on platinum nanoparticle formation in inductively coupled thermal plasmas. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 074903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pfender, E.; Fincke, J.; Spores, R. Entrainment of cold gas into thermal plasma jets. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 1991, 11, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mostaghimi, J.; Boulos, M.I. Thermal Plasma Sources: How Well are They Adopted to Process Needs? Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2015, 35, 421–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shigeta, M. Progress of computational plasma fluid mechanics. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2023, 62, SL0801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Girshick, S.L.; Chiu, C.P.; Muno, R.; Wu, C.Y.; Yang, L.; Singh, S.K.; McMurry, P.H. Thermal plasma synthesis of ultrafine iron particles. J. Aerosol Sci. 1993, 24, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Watanabe, T.; Nezu, A.; Abe, Y.; Ishii, Y.; Adachi, K. Formation mechanism of electrically conductive nanoparticles by induction thermal plasmas. Thin Solid Film. 2003, 435, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, X.H.; Li, J.G.; Kamiyama, H.; Katada, M.; Ohashi, N.; Moriyoshi, Y.; Ishigaki, T. Pyrogenic Iron(III)-Doped TiO2 Nanopowders Synthesized in RF Thermal Plasma:  Phase Formation, Defect Structure, Band Gap, and Magnetic Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10982–10990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kong, P.C.; Lau, Y.C. Plasma synthesis of ceramic powders. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 1809–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shigeta, M. Modeling and simulation of a turbulent-like thermal plasma jet for nanopowder production. IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2019, 14, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shigeta, M. Simulating Turbulent Thermal Plasma Flows for Nanopowder Fabrication. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2020, 40, 775–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shigeta, M.; Watanabe, T. Multi-component co-condensation model of Ti-based boride/silicide nanoparticle growth in induction thermal plasmas. Thin Solid Films 2007, 515, 4217–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shigeta, M.; Watanabe, T. Growth mechanism of silicon-based functional nanoparticles fabricated by inductively coupled thermal plasmas. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kambara, M.; Kitayama, A.; Homma, K.; Hideshima, T.; Kaga, M.; Sheem, K.-Y.; Ishida, S.; Yoshida, T. Nano-composite Si particle formation by plasma spraying for negative electrode of Li ion batteries. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 143302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kodama, N.; Tanaka, Y.; Kita, K.; Uesugi, Y.; Ishijima, T.; Watanabe, S.; Nakamura, K. A method for large-scale synthesis of Al-doped TiO2 nanopowder using pulse-modulated induction thermal plasmas with time-controlled feedstock feeding. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 195304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tanaka, Y.; Tsuke, T.; Guo, W.; Uesugi, Y.; Ishijima, T.; Watanabe, S.; Nakamura, K. A large amount synthesis of nanopowder using modulated induction thermal plasmas synchronized with intermittent feeding of raw materials. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2012, 406, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shigeta, M.; Murphy, A.B. Thermal plasmas for nanofabrication. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 174025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Colombo, V.; Ghedini, E.; Gherardi, M.; Sanibondi, P.; Shigeta, M. A two-dimensional nodal model with turbulent effects for the synthesis of Si nano-particles by inductively coupled thermal plasmas. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2012, 21, 025001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hirayama, Y.; Shigeta, M.; Liu, Z.; Yodoshi, N.; Hosokawa, A.; Takagi, K. Anisotropic Nd-Fe ultrafine particles with stable and metastable phases prepared by induction thermal plasma. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 873, 159724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shigeta, M.; Watanabe, T. Two-Directional Nodal Model for Co-Condensation Growth of Multicomponent Nanoparticles in Thermal Plasma Processing. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2009, 18, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Van Ende, M.-A.; Jung, I.-H. Critical thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the Fe–B, Fe–Nd, B–Nd and Nd–Fe–B systems. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 548, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guisbiers, G.; Kazan, M.; Van Overschelde, O.; Wautelet, M.; Pereira, S. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Metallic and Semiconductive Nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 4097–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shigeta, M.; Tanaka, M. Visualization of electromagnetic-thermal-fluid phenomena in arc welding. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 59, SA0805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Takaki, S.; Makita, K.; Okamoto, A. Examination of Crystal Orientation in Green Compact and Sintered Nd-Fe-B Magnets by X-ray Diffraction. J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall. 2002, 50, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Park, K.; Hirayama, Y.; Shigeta, M.; Liu, Z.; Kobashi, M.; Takagi, K. Anisotropic Sm-Co nanopowder prepared by induction thermal plasma. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 882, 160633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shigeta, M.; Watanabe, T. Effect of Saturation Pressure Difference on Metal–Silicide Nanopowder Formation in Thermal Plasma Fabrication. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shigeta, M.; Hirayama, Y.; Ghedini, E. Computational Study of Quenching Effects on Growth Processes and Size Distributions of Silicon Nanoparticles at a Thermal Plasma Tail. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the Sm powder prepared by skull gas atomizing (i) with and (ii) without exposure to air. The energy of the incident X-ray is 14.00 keV (wavelength: 0.08857 nm). (b) SEM image and (c) particle size distribution of the skull gas-atomized Sm powder.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the Sm powder prepared by skull gas atomizing (i) with and (ii) without exposure to air. The energy of the incident X-ray is 14.00 keV (wavelength: 0.08857 nm). (b) SEM image and (c) particle size distribution of the skull gas-atomized Sm powder.
Nanomaterials 15 01045 g001
Figure 2. SEM images and histograms of the powder prepared via the ITP method at (a) x = 1.5 and (b) x = 6.0, respectively. The mean particle size and standard deviation σ are determined from the histograms by fitting them to the log-normal distribution function. (c) XRD patterns of the as-ITP-processed powder annealed at 600 °C in Ar flow and nitrided at 400 °C. The references of the peaks of TbCu7-type SmFe9, SmFe2 and SmFe3 are PDF#00-043-1311, PDF#00-025-1152 and PDF#00-050-1450, respectively. The energy of the incident X-ray is 14.00 keV (wavelength: 0.08857 nm).
Figure 2. SEM images and histograms of the powder prepared via the ITP method at (a) x = 1.5 and (b) x = 6.0, respectively. The mean particle size and standard deviation σ are determined from the histograms by fitting them to the log-normal distribution function. (c) XRD patterns of the as-ITP-processed powder annealed at 600 °C in Ar flow and nitrided at 400 °C. The references of the peaks of TbCu7-type SmFe9, SmFe2 and SmFe3 are PDF#00-043-1311, PDF#00-025-1152 and PDF#00-050-1450, respectively. The energy of the incident X-ray is 14.00 keV (wavelength: 0.08857 nm).
Nanomaterials 15 01045 g002
Figure 3. (a) Elemental maps for Sm, Fe, and N. (b,c) High-resolution STEM images of the #1 and #2 particles shown in (a), with FFT images and nanobeam diffraction only for (c).
Figure 3. (a) Elemental maps for Sm, Fe, and N. (b,c) High-resolution STEM images of the #1 and #2 particles shown in (a), with FFT images and nanobeam diffraction only for (c).
Nanomaterials 15 01045 g003
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns of the nitrided sample of the Sm–Fe made with a ratio of Sm:Fe = 1:6, “iso” is a nonmagnetic-aligned sample provided for reference. The normal vector of the XRD measurement is parallel (OOP) or perpendicular (IP) to the direction of magnetic alignment. The reference of the peaks of TbCu7-type Sm0.667Fe5.667N1.044 is PDF#01-089-7982. The energy of the incident X-ray is 14.37 keV (wavelength: 0.0863 nm). The inlet figure shows the configuration of the angles of the θ/2θ and pole figure measurements. (b) Contour map of the count as a function of β and χ, and (c) normalized intensity profile that integrates β from 0 to 2π as a function of χ.
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns of the nitrided sample of the Sm–Fe made with a ratio of Sm:Fe = 1:6, “iso” is a nonmagnetic-aligned sample provided for reference. The normal vector of the XRD measurement is parallel (OOP) or perpendicular (IP) to the direction of magnetic alignment. The reference of the peaks of TbCu7-type Sm0.667Fe5.667N1.044 is PDF#01-089-7982. The energy of the incident X-ray is 14.37 keV (wavelength: 0.0863 nm). The inlet figure shows the configuration of the angles of the θ/2θ and pole figure measurements. (b) Contour map of the count as a function of β and χ, and (c) normalized intensity profile that integrates β from 0 to 2π as a function of χ.
Nanomaterials 15 01045 g004
Figure 5. Hysteresis loops at 300 K (upper) and 10 K (lower) for the nitrided sample of Sm–Fe made with a ratio of Sm:Fe = 1:6. Configurations wherein the magnetic direction during the measurement is parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic alignment are denoted as “easy” and “hard,” respectively.
Figure 5. Hysteresis loops at 300 K (upper) and 10 K (lower) for the nitrided sample of Sm–Fe made with a ratio of Sm:Fe = 1:6. Configurations wherein the magnetic direction during the measurement is parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic alignment are denoted as “easy” and “hard,” respectively.
Nanomaterials 15 01045 g005
Figure 6. Vapor consumption rates of (a) Fe and (b) Sm. (c) Conversion ratios of Fe and Sm.
Figure 6. Vapor consumption rates of (a) Fe and (b) Sm. (c) Conversion ratios of Fe and Sm.
Nanomaterials 15 01045 g006
Figure 7. Particle number density map against the Sm concentration and particle diameter.
Figure 7. Particle number density map against the Sm concentration and particle diameter.
Nanomaterials 15 01045 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hirayama, Y.; Wang, J.; Shigeta, M.; Tsurumi, S.; Sugimoto, M.; Liu, Z.; Takagi, K.; Ozaki, K. Nanosized Anisotropic Sm–Fe–N Particles with Metastable TbCu7-Type Structures Prepared by an Induction Thermal Plasma Process. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15131045

AMA Style

Hirayama Y, Wang J, Shigeta M, Tsurumi S, Sugimoto M, Liu Z, Takagi K, Ozaki K. Nanosized Anisotropic Sm–Fe–N Particles with Metastable TbCu7-Type Structures Prepared by an Induction Thermal Plasma Process. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(13):1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15131045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hirayama, Yusuke, Jian Wang, Masaya Shigeta, Shunsuke Tsurumi, Makoto Sugimoto, Zheng Liu, Kenta Takagi, and Kimihiro Ozaki. 2025. "Nanosized Anisotropic Sm–Fe–N Particles with Metastable TbCu7-Type Structures Prepared by an Induction Thermal Plasma Process" Nanomaterials 15, no. 13: 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15131045

APA Style

Hirayama, Y., Wang, J., Shigeta, M., Tsurumi, S., Sugimoto, M., Liu, Z., Takagi, K., & Ozaki, K. (2025). Nanosized Anisotropic Sm–Fe–N Particles with Metastable TbCu7-Type Structures Prepared by an Induction Thermal Plasma Process. Nanomaterials, 15(13), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15131045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop