Next Article in Journal
Different Optical Behaviors Revealed by Electroluminescence and Photoluminescence of InGaN/GaN Coupled Quantum Wells
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Resonant Full-Solar-Spectrum Perfect Metamaterial Absorber
Previous Article in Journal
Emerging Low Detection Limit of Optically Activated Gas Sensors Based on 2D and Hybrid Nanostructures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Graphene-Based Dual-Band Metasurface Absorber with High Frequency Ratio

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Shanghai Institute of Satellite Engineering, Shanghai 201109, China
3
Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology, Shanghai 201109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(18), 1522; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14181522
Submission received: 29 August 2024 / Revised: 16 September 2024 / Accepted: 18 September 2024 / Published: 20 September 2024

Abstract

:
In this paper, we propose a novel dual-band metasurface absorber with a high frequency ratio based on graphene. By carefully designing a centrally symmetrical graphene pattern and positioning it on a glass medium, while utilizing ITO as a ground, the metasurface absorber achieves remarkable high frequency ratio microwave absorption. Specifically, this metasurface absorber exhibits two distinct resonance points at 3.7 GHz and 14 GHz, with an impressive frequency ratio over 3.5. It achieves over 90% absorption efficiency in the frequency ranges of 3.5–4.5 GHz and 13.5–14.5 GHz, highlighting its capability to effectively absorb microwaves across widely spaced frequency bands. Furthermore, the metasurface absorber demonstrates optical transparency and polarization insensitivity, adding to its versatility and potential applications. The measured results of the fabricated prototype validate its design and potential for practical use.

1. Introduction

Metasurfaces have emerged as a compelling research area in electromagnetics and optics, offering a unique paradigm for manipulating electromagnetic waves with subwavelength-scale structures [1,2,3,4,5]. Composed of engineered arrays of subwavelength elements, metasurfaces enable precise control over the phase [6], amplitude [7], and polarization [8] of electromagnetic waves. Through careful design, metasurfaces can shape wavefronts [9], steer beams [10], and realize functionalities traditionally achieved with bulk components. Metasurfaces find applications in imaging [11], sensing [12], and communication [13], being promising compact and lightweight devices with unprecedented functionalities. The development of metasurfaces has opened up exciting avenues for advancing microwave technologies and has spurred significant research efforts toward harnessing their potential in various fields [14,15].
Graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional hexagonal lattice, has garnered significant attention in the scientific community due to its exceptional properties [16,17,18,19]. Particularly, graphene-based metasurfaces offer exciting prospects for advanced electromagnetic wave manipulation [20,21,22]. Their tunable and dynamic conductivity, high carrier mobility, and strong interaction with light make them an ideal candidate for metasurface applications. Graphene-based metasurfaces provide unprecedented control over light-matter interactions, enabling functionalities such as beam steering, polarization control, and wavefront manipulation across various wavelengths [23,24,25,26]. Additionally, graphene’s broadband absorption enhances electromagnetic wave or light trapping and absorption, making it valuable for applications such as photodetectors [27,28,29] and energy harvesting devices [30,31]. The integration of graphene in metasurfaces opens avenues for compact and versatile devices with enhanced performance.
Designing high-frequency-ratio dual-band absorption metasurfaces is challenging due to the need for precise control over structural parameters and the trade-off between absorption efficiency and bandwidth. Achieving efficient absorption at two widely separated frequencies demands intricate optimization of subwavelength structures. It requires exploring new design principles, advanced optimization algorithms, and innovative fabrication techniques. Overcoming these challenges is crucial for unlocking the full potential of high-frequency-ratio dual-band absorption metasurface absorbers in various applications such as multispectral sensing, energy harvesting, thermal management, communication systems, and photonic devices. High-frequency-ratio dual-band absorption metasurface absorbers offer enhanced sensitivity, expanded bandwidth, and versatile functionality.
In this paper, we propose a graphene-based metasurface absorber featuring a centrally symmetric patterned graphene as the top layer, quartz glass as the middle substrate, and an ITO film as the back plate. The resonance principles of this metasurface absorber are numerically demonstrated through CST Microwave Studio, where the dual-band absorption with a high frequency ratio is clearly achieved. The patterned graphene surfaces of the metasurface absorber are successfully fabricated using methods based on chemical vapor deposition and laser etching. The performance of the proposed metasurface absorber is experimentally verified.

2. Design and Simulation

According to the Kubo formula [32], graphene’s the surface conductivity has both intraband and interband contributions, as follows:
σ intra ( ω , μ c , Γ , T ) = i e 2 k B T π 2 ( ω + 2 i Γ ) μ c k B T + 2 ln exp μ c k B T + 1 ,
and
σ inter ( ω , μ c , Γ , T ) = i e 2 4 π ln 2 | μ c | ω 2 i Γ 2 | μ c | + ω + 2 i Γ .
Here, k B is the Boltzmann constant and is the Plank constant, Γ = 1 / ( 2 τ ) , with τ being the carrier relaxation time in graphene, and μ c being graphene’s chemical potential.
In the microwave band, graphene’s surface conductivity is mainly defined by intraband transitions [7]. Therefore, at microwave frequencies, graphene can be modeled as a resistive planar sheet of resistance [33],
R g = 1 σ g 1 σ intra .
The sheet resistance of graphene is related to the chemical potential and the relaxation time of graphene.
The unit cell structure of the metasurface absorber is shown in Figure 1a. The overall structure consists of three layers: The top layer consists of a segmented graphene surface with a surface resistance of 90 Ω /sq. The intermediate dielectric layer is composed of glass with a dielectric constant of 7.6, and its thickness is 6 mm. The bottom layer is constructed from an ITO ground, featuring a surface resistance of 6 Ω /sq. Owing to the optically transparent attributes inherent in all three constituent layers, the resultant metasurface structure attains optical transparency. The dimensions of the top graphene layer are configured as illustrated in Figure 1c. The bottom left and top right sections depict identically sized, mutually independent graphene cross-shaped patches, thereby satisfying a condition of central symmetry. Conversely, the top left and bottom right sections remain devoid of any structural elements. The geometric parameters are defined as follows: p = 22 mm, l = 10.9 mm, d = 1.5 mm, and the thickness of the glass layer is 6 mm. It is worth noting that, since the thickness of monolayer graphene is sub-nanometer while the typical dimension of microwave devices is in mm or cm scale, it may include considerable numerical error when model graphene by its electrical permittivity. Similar to those in [8,11], the graphene layer is modeled as a resistance sheet with zero thickness in our simulation.
The metasurface absorber is numerically investigated using the commercial software CST Microwave Studio 2019 version. In the simulation, the x and y directions are set as periodic boundaries, while the z direction is set as an open (adding space) boundary condition. Plane waves were employed as the excitation source, and a frequency solver was employed for computations. In our simulation, the distances of the ports from the metasurface were 20 mm for both positive and negative z directions. We set adaptive tetrahedral mesh refinement to reach accurate numerical results. The results are illustrated in Figure 2, depicting the reflection coefficient and absorptivity of the metasurface. The absorptivity at each frequency point was calculated using the following formula, A ( ω ) = 1 | r ( ω ) | 2 | t ( ω ) | 2 , where | r ( ω ) | represents the reflection coefficient, | t ( ω ) | represents the transmission coefficient; moreover, since transmission is negligible within this structure, it can be disregarded. As discerned from the graph, two absorption peaks are evident at 3.7 GHz and 14 GHz, each accompanied by an absorption bandwidth of approximately 1 GHz centered around these two frequency points.
The material parameters are crucial to the performance of the designed metasurface, such as the surface resistance of graphene R g and the dielectric constant of the substrate ε . This is particularly important considering that, due to limitations imposed by the fabrication process, an exact match between the simulated and actual values of these parameters cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the impact when varying these crucial material parameters. Figure 3a,b illustrate the impact of variations within a certain range of material parameters, R g and ε , on the absorption efficiency.
As depicted in Figure 3a, the high-frequency point, f 2 , remains relatively stable regardless of the changes in R g . Regarding the low-frequency point, f 1 , as the value of R g increases, f 1 distinctly shifts to the right. Once R g reaches 90 Ω /sq, it no longer satisfies the requirement for 90% absorption at 3.7 GHz. Conversely, when R g decreases, the absorptivity criteria are consistently met. Therefore, the range of graphene surface resistance between 30 and 70 Ω /sq accommodates the design specifications. As indicated by Figure 3b, variations in the dielectric constant of the substrate primarily affect the high-frequency f 2 . It is clearly seen that the resonance frequency f 2 shifts from 15.8 GHz to 12.7 GHz when the dielectric constant ε increases from 6 to 9.2.
From the perspective of resonance principles, Figure 4a,b present the electric field distribution at two absorption peak frequencies. It is evident from the figure that, for both frequencies, the electric field predominantly concentrates at the four corners of the graphene patches, indicating the occurrence of electric resonance at both peak points. Figure 4a–d depict the surface current distribution of graphene and ITO at the two resonance frequencies. It is observable from the graph that at both resonance points, the direction of surface current on the top graphene layer is opposite to that on the underlying ITO ground, indicating the presence of magnetic resonance. Hence, both absorption peak frequencies in the metasurface absorber originate from the coexistence of electric and magnetic resonances. Moreover, the disparities in electric field distribution and surface current distribution reveal that electric resonance is more pronounced at 3.7 GHz, while magnetic resonance dominates at 14 GHz (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

3. Fabrication and Measurement

As the microwave wavelengths are in the centimeter range, large-sized, high-quality monolayer graphene is essential for investigating graphene metasurfaces in the microwave domain. We employ chemical vapor deposition (CVD) on a 25 μ m thick copper substrates to synthesize monolayer graphene. This method offers a mature fabrication process that can be continuously improved by refining growth conditions, resulting in the production of continuous, high-quality monolayer graphene films. After CVD preparation, the deposited graphene is then transfered to a 125 μ m thick PET film via the dry transfer method. It is worth noting that the monolayer graphene layer was transferred twice, with N-type doping being used to improve its homogeneity and reduce the sheet resistance. Finally, the structured patterns of the graphene layer were fabricated via a standard laser beam cutting method.
To validate the effectiveness of the designed metasurface absorber, we conducted graphene processing and testing experiments. Based on the material dimensions, we fabricated a 9 × 13 unit array. The fabricated overall metasurface absorber and the graphene pattern are depicted in Figure 7b,c, respectively. The overall dimension of the metasurface absorber is 20 cm × 30 cm, with a total thickness of around 6.25 mm. The experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 7a, where an arch-shaped structure is employed to secure the far-field reflection with two transmitting and receiving antennas, where the metasurface absorber sample is positioned in between absorptive foams. Before each test, the vector network analyzer is calibrated using a metal plate of the same size as the metasurface absorber sample.
Under normal incidence, the measured results are presented in Figure 8. There exists a certain disparity between the experimental and simulation results. Specifically, the low-frequency absorption peak is observed at 3.8 GHz, while the high-frequency absorption peak is situated at 14 GHz. Overall, the experimental results are in reasonable agreement with the expected behavior. The deviations in frequency points can primarily be attributed to factors such as imprecise material parameters and insufficient material homogeneity.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have numerically designed and experimentally demonstrated a novel dual-band metasurface absorber with a high frequency ratio based on a structured graphene pattern. Such a dual-band metasurface absorber is carefully designed with a centrally symmetrical graphene pattern and placed on a glass medium with an ITO layer as a ground. The dual-band metasurface absorber shows remarkable microwave absorption with a high frequency ratio. Specifically, this metasurface absorber shows two distinct resonance points at 3.7 GHz and 14 GHz, with an impressive frequency ratio over 3.5. It achieves over 90% absorption efficiency in the frequency ranges of 3.5–4.5 GHz and 13.5–14.5 GHz. Furthermore, the metasurface absorber demonstrates optical transparency and polarization insensitivity, adding to its versatility and potential applications. The measured results are in good accordance with the simulation, validating its potential for practical use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z. and Z.C.; validation, A.C. and N.C.; formal analysis, A.C.; investigation, A.C. and N.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.; writing—review and editing, N.C., W.Z. and Z.C.; supervision, W.Z. and Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Industry-University-Research Collaboration Fund of Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (grant number USCAST2023-14).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yu, N.; Genevet, P.; Kats, M.A.; Aieta, F.; Tetienne, J.P.; Capasso, F.; Gaburro, Z. Light Propagation with Phase Discontinuities: Generalized Laws of Reflection and Refraction. Science 2011, 334, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, S.; He, Q.; Xiao, S.; Xu, Q.; Li, X.; Zhou, L. Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cui, T.J.; Liu, S.; Li, L.L. Information entropy of coding metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 2016, 5, e16172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, K.; Ding, G.; Hu, G.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, J.; Feng, Y.; Jiang, T.; Alù, A.; Qiu, C.W. Directional Janus Metasurface. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Akram, M.R.; Ding, G.; Chen, K.; Feng, Y.; Zhu, W. Ultrathin Single Layer Metasurfaces with Ultra-Wideband Operation for Both Transmission and Reflection. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Si, L.; Zhu, W. Mechanically Reconfigurable Folded Reflectarray Antenna for Variable Near-Field Focusing. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 10038–10043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lu, W.B.; Wang, J.W.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.G.; Chen, H.; Song, W.J.; Jiang, Z.H. Flexible and optically transparent microwave absorber with wide bandwidth based on graphene. Carbon 2019, 152, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, C.; Shao, L.; Zhu, W. Dynamic manipulation of microwave polarization based on anisotropic graphene meta-device. NPJ 2D Mater. Appl. 2022, 6, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tian, J.; Shi, H.; Li, S.; He, C.; Zhu, W. Single-Layer Programmable Metasurface for Manipulating Both Linearly and Circularly Polarized Electromagnetic Waves. ACS Appl. Opt. Mater. 2024, 2, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ni, X.; Emani, N.K.; Kildishev, A.V.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V.M. Broadband Light Bending with Plasmonic Nanoantennas. Science 2012, 335, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; He, C.; Si, L.; Rukhlenko, I.D.; Zhu, W. Graphene-based ultralow-profile microwave Fresnel lens. Carbon 2024, 217, 118599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, C.; Xue, T.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Xie, J.; Wang, G.; Yao, J.; Zhu, W.; Ye, X. Terahertz toroidal metasurface biosensor for sensitive distinction of lung cancer cells. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tang, W.; Chen, M.Z.; Dai, J.Y.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, X.; Jin, S.; Cheng, Q.; Cui, T.J. Wireless Communications with Programmable Metasurface: New Paradigms, Opportunities, and Challenges on Transceiver Design. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shao, L.; Zhu, W. Recent advances in electromagnetic metamaterials and metasurfaces for polarization manipulation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2024, 57, 343001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Z.; Premaratne, M.; Zhu, W. Advanced encryption method realized by secret shared phase encoding scheme using a multi-wavelength metasurface. Nanophotonics 2020, 9, 3687–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Geim, A.K. Graphene: Status and Prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Koppens, F.H.L.; Mueller, T.; Avouris, P.; Ferrari, A.C.; Vitiello, M.S.; Polini, M. Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 780–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bonaccorso, F.; Sun, Z.; Hasan, T.; Ferrari, A.C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shao, L.; Zhu, W. Graphene-derived microwave metamaterials and meta-devices: Emerging applications and properties. Electron 2024, 2, e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pianelli, A.; Kowerdziej, R.; Dudek, M.; Sielezin, K.; Olifierczuk, M.; Parka, J. Graphene-based hyperbolic metamaterial as a switchable reflection modulator. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 6708–6718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dudek, M.; Kowerdziej, R.; Pianelli, A.; Parka, J. Graphene-based tunable hyperbolic microcavity. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shi, H.; Tian, J.; Chen, N.; Zhu, W. Wideband high-efficiency scattering reduction in a graphene based optically transparent and flexible metasurface. Carbon 2024, 225, 119150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Shao, L.; Xiao, F.; Zhu, W. Active modulation of electromagnetically induced transparency analog in graphene-based microwave metamaterial. Carbon 2021, 183, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, W.; Hu, B.; Huang, Z.; Guan, H.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, H.; Xiong, X.; Liu, J.; et al. Graphene-enabled electrically controlled terahertz meta-lens. Photonics Res. 2018, 6, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, H.; Lu, W.B.; Liu, Z.G.; Geng, M.Y. Microwave Programmable Graphene Metasurface. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, H.; Wei, J.; Sun, F.; Nie, C.; Fu, J.; Shi, H.; Sun, J.; Wei, X.; Qiu, C.W. Enhanced Photogating Effect in Graphene Photodetectors via Potential Fluctuation Engineering. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 4458–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, H.; Fu, J.; Wei, J.; Li, S.; Nie, C.; Sun, F.; Wu, Q.Y.S.; Liu, M.; Dong, Z.; Wei, X.; et al. Synergistic-potential engineering enables high-efficiency graphene photodetectors for near- to mid-infrared light. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fu, J.; Nie, C.; Sun, F.; Li, G.; Shi, H.; Wei, X. Bionic visual-audio photodetectors with in-sensor perception and preprocessing. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadk8199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, S.H.; Choi, M.; Kim, T.T.; Lee, S.; Liu, M.; Yin, X.; Choi, H.K.; Lee, S.S.; Choi, C.G.; Choi, S.Y.; et al. Switching terahertz waves with gate-controlled active graphene metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 936–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sensale-Rodriguez, B.; Yan, R.; Kelly, M.M.; Fang, T.; Tahy, K.; Hwang, W.S.; Jena, D.; Liu, L.; Xing, H.G. Broadband graphene terahertz modulators enabled by intraband transitions. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hanson, G.W. Dyadic Green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 064302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, J.; Shao, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, W. Graphene-Based Optically Transparent Metasurface Capable of Dual-Polarized Modulation for Electromagnetic Stealth. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 31075–31084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic view of the proposed metasurface absorber, (b) graphene, and (c) geometric parameters of the metasurface absorber.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic view of the proposed metasurface absorber, (b) graphene, and (c) geometric parameters of the metasurface absorber.
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g001
Figure 2. Simulated reflective coefficient and absorptivity curves of the proposed metasurface absorber.
Figure 2. Simulated reflective coefficient and absorptivity curves of the proposed metasurface absorber.
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g002
Figure 3. (a) Variation of absorptivity curves when adjusting (a) surface resistance of graphene R g and (b) dielectric constant of the substrate ε .
Figure 3. (a) Variation of absorptivity curves when adjusting (a) surface resistance of graphene R g and (b) dielectric constant of the substrate ε .
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g003
Figure 4. The surface currents of (a,b) graphene layer and (c,d) ITO ground at 3.7 GHz and 14 GHz, respectively.
Figure 4. The surface currents of (a,b) graphene layer and (c,d) ITO ground at 3.7 GHz and 14 GHz, respectively.
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g004
Figure 5. The electric fields in the top view at resonant frequencies of (a) 3.7 GHz and (b) 14 GHz.
Figure 5. The electric fields in the top view at resonant frequencies of (a) 3.7 GHz and (b) 14 GHz.
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g005
Figure 6. Full-wave simulated scattering patterns at H-Plane at the frequencies of (a) 3.7 GHz and (b) 14 GHz.
Figure 6. Full-wave simulated scattering patterns at H-Plane at the frequencies of (a) 3.7 GHz and (b) 14 GHz.
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g006
Figure 7. Photograph of (a) measurement setup, (b) metasurface test sample, and (c) graphene patterned layer.
Figure 7. Photograph of (a) measurement setup, (b) metasurface test sample, and (c) graphene patterned layer.
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of the reflection curves of the metasurface absorber via an experiment and simulation.
Figure 8. Comparison of the reflection curves of the metasurface absorber via an experiment and simulation.
Nanomaterials 14 01522 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, A.; Chen, N.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Z. Graphene-Based Dual-Band Metasurface Absorber with High Frequency Ratio. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14181522

AMA Style

Cao A, Chen N, Zhu W, Chen Z. Graphene-Based Dual-Band Metasurface Absorber with High Frequency Ratio. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(18):1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14181522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Anjie, Nengfu Chen, Weiren Zhu, and Zhansheng Chen. 2024. "Graphene-Based Dual-Band Metasurface Absorber with High Frequency Ratio" Nanomaterials 14, no. 18: 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14181522

APA Style

Cao, A., Chen, N., Zhu, W., & Chen, Z. (2024). Graphene-Based Dual-Band Metasurface Absorber with High Frequency Ratio. Nanomaterials, 14(18), 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14181522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop